Fatigue crack initiation life (FCI life) of stress concentration can be predicted according to compare between elastic-plastic strain at there and total strain-fatigue life curve (Δet-Nf curve) of smooth specimen. Elastic-plastic strain is estimated by use of Neuber's rule etc., and Δet-Nf curve is estimated by use of Manson's universal slope method (US method) etc. At this point, cyclic stress-strain curve (CSS curve) is needed in order to estimate the elastic-plastic strain using Neuber's rule etc. However, CSS curve formulated by Ramberg-Osgood relation can be transform from Δet-Nf curve formulated by Coffin-Manson & Basquin relation. Consequently, simplified fatigue life prediction methods can be constructed by only mechanical properties (tensile strength, true fracture ductility, Young modulus, etc.), according to combine these estimation methods (Neuber's rule, US method, etc.).In this report, we compared actual fatigue fracture life (FF life) of some stress concentration specimens with predicted FCI life of them obtained by use of simplified methods, and then evaluated about a practical use of simplified methods. The conclusions are obtained as follows :(1) About the precision of predicted fatigue life, modified universal slope method (MUS method) was better for steels, and Median method was better for aluminum alloys and titanium alloys.(2) For steels, the predicted fatigue life using ESED rule was more effective than using Neuber's rule.(3) In case of using elastic stress concentration factor Kt, the ratio of predicted FCI life Np and actual FF life Nf (Np/Nf) was conspicuously decreasing with increasing of Kt.(4) Taking account of decrease of Np/Nf, simplified method can be employed for preliminary fatigue design.
Read full abstract