Universal Screening For Intimate Partner Violence Research Articles

Barriers and facilitators to screening for intimate partner violence at a level 1 trauma center

BackgroundIntimate partner violence (IPV) is a significant public health problem that is associated with substantial health sequelae, including traumatic injury. Surgical professional societies recommend universal intimate partner violence screening in patients presenting after trauma, but this recommendation is not uniformly implemented. We designed and implemented a quality improvement project at our institution in July 2020 to enhance intimate partner violence screening. Although screening rates improved, they remained suboptimal. Therefore, we sought to examine barriers and facilitators to intimate partner violence screening from trauma clinicians’ perspectives. Study DesignWe conducted a qualitative study using in-depth, semistructured interviews to understand the perspectives and experiences of trauma clinicians conducting intimate partner violence screening. A constructivist paradigm informed our study whereby our data collection approaches aimed to understand intimate partner violence screening from the perspectives of those tasked with implementing screening within real-world clinical settings. We used thematic analysis to analyze our data and generate themes related to barriers and facilitators to screening. ResultsWe conducted interviews with 12 resident physicians and 2 advance practice providers. We identified 6 themes, 3 reflecting facilitator themes as (1) standardized education and workflow, (2) benefits of interdisciplinary teamwork, and (3) context of screening, and 3 reflecting barrier themes as (1) lack of time, (2) language misinterpretation, and (3) perceived inappropriateness of universal screening. ConclusionTrauma clinicians described multiple facilitators and barriers to screening for intimate partner violence following traumatic injury, some of which were unique to the trauma setting. Projects seeking to achieve universal screening following traumatic injury may benefit from accounting for these factors when designing interventions.

On Your Mark, Get Set, Go: A Descriptive Study of Initial Implementation of Universal Intimate Partner Violence Screening at a Veterans Health Administration Facility

Intimate partner violence (IPV) negatively impacts mental, physical, and social health, and veterans are at a greater risk for experiencing lifetime IPV than civilians. Prior research has identified facilitators and barriers to sustained implementation of IPV screening but has often focused solely on screening reproductive-aged women or screening within a single clinical setting. In contrast, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) IPV Assistance Program has recently developed a comprehensive plan for universal training and education of all staff and universal screening and intervention for all veterans, which, to our knowledge, is the first such large-scale IPV program. This program evaluation project examines the plan’s initial implementation across multiple clinical settings at one VHA site following a concerted training effort of 422 interdisciplinary staff. Over 17 months, clinicians completed 2,596 screenings out of 4,128 screening opportunities utilizing the Hurt, Insult, Threaten, and Scream tool. Eighteen percent of veterans screened positive for past-year IPV experience; of those, 29% screened positive on a secondary screen for acute safety needs and risk for lethality. Female veterans were screened more frequently than male veterans (χ2= 119,p< .001) and younger veterans more frequently than older veterans (effect of age strata ≤47, 48–64, or ≥65: χ2= 107,p< .001), but all age strata and genders had clinically important rates of positive screens. In addition to establishing local baseline prevalence, data on screening outcomes by sex, age, deferred screening opportunities, clinics where screening occurred, and interventions utilized offer insights on the impact of training, specific barriers, and future directions for enhancing and expanding training and screening efforts.

Substance Use and Associated Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence Among MSM in Los Angeles, California.

This study examined the prevalence and correlates of intimate partner violence (IPV) among a cohort of racial/ethnically diverse men who have sex with men (MSM) in Los Angeles. An ongoing longitudinal cohort study of MSM in Los Angeles, constructed by design so half of the participants use substances (SU) and half are persons living with HIV, provided data. Data collection occured between 2014 and 2020. At semiannual study visits, participants completed a computer-assisted self-interview which included questions on substance use (past 6 months) and experiences of IPV (past 12 months). The criterion variable was reported physical and sexual IPV. Multivariable models generalized estimating equations (GEE) estimated associations between reported SU and physical and sexual IPV, adjusting for repeated measurement and confounders. In total, 557 persons (2,962 visits) contributed to the analysis; the median baseline age was 30 years (interquartile range: 28.0-39.0). The prevalence of IPV in the past 12 months was 22.3%, with 18.3% reporting physical and 10.2% reporting sexual IPV across study visits. Stimulant use prevalence was higher among those who reported IPV compared to those who did not (68% vs. 42.1%; p < .001); cannabis use prevalence was lower among those reporting IPV (42.3% vs. 49% respectively; p < .001). Adjusted analysis showed reported stimulant use associated with greater odds of physical IPV (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.4, 2.8], p < .001) but not sexual IPV (aOR = 1.3; 95% CI [0.8, 2.0], p = .332). Models stratified by HIV status yielded similar results. Findings showed a high prevalence of past-year IPV experiences among MSM in Los Angeles. Findings highlight links between SU and IPV and underscore a significantly increased likelihood of IPV for MSM in Los Angeles who report current methamphetamine use. This study provides evidence to support universal IPV screening and to make available safety resources at all points where MSM seek healthcare.

Examining Cases of Child Physical Abuse Evaluations to Identify Opportunities to Improve Intimate Partner Violence Screening in Pediatric Emergency Departments.

The association between child maltreatment and intimate partner violence (IPV) is well supported. Universal IPV screening has been recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the United States Preventative Task Force, and many children's hospitals have established screening protocols. However, the yield and best screening method in families undergoing a child physical abuse (PA) evaluation have not been fully explored. To determine if there is a discrepancy in IPV disclosures between universal IPV screening completed during pediatric emergency department (PED) triage ("triage screening") and IPV screening by a social worker ("social work screening") in families of children who were evaluated for PA. Caregivers of children who presented to an urban tertiary PED and underwent an evaluation for PA via a child abuse pediatrics consult. A retrospective chart review was completed. Data collection included: caregiver responses to both triage screening and social work screening, interview setting details and participants, the child's injuries, and details of the family's reported IPV experiences. Our study (N = 329) revealed that social work screening produced significantly more positive IPV disclosures than triage screening (14.0% vs. 4.3%, p < .001). Additionally, non-IPV violence concerns were identified in 35.7% (n = 5) of the positive triage screens, whereas social work screens had none. These results highlight the benefits of IPV screening by social work in high-risk scenarios, such as child PA evaluations, regardless of universal IPV screening results. Exploring differences between the two screening methods can inform decisions about screening protocols to improve IPV identification in high-risk populations.

Video Consultations and Safety App Targeting Pregnant Women Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence in Denmark and Spain: Nested Cohort Intervention Study (STOP Study).

Intimate partner violence (IPV) during pregnancy is a public health issue with wide-ranging consequences for both the mother and fetus, and interventions are needed. Therefore, the Stop Intimate Partner Violence in Pregnancy (STOP) cohort was established with the overall aim to identify pregnant women exposed to IPV through digital screening and offer women screening positive for IPV a digital supportive intervention. The aim of this study was to (1) introduce the design and profile of the STOP cohort study, (2) assess the feasibility of implementing digital IPV screening among pregnant women, and (3) assess the feasibility of implementing a digital supportive intervention targeting pregnant women exposed to IPV. Pregnant women attending antenatal care in the Region of Southern Denmark and in Andalucía, Spain were offered digital screening for IPV using validated scales (Abuse Assessment Screen and Women Abuse Screening Tool). Women who screened positive were eligible to receive a digital supportive intervention. The intervention consisted of 3-6 video consultations with an IPV counselor and a safety planning app. In Denmark, IPV counselors were antenatal care midwives trained by a psychologist specialized in IPV, whereas in Spain, the counselor was a psychologist. Data collection started in February 2021 and was completed in October 2022. Across Denmark and Spain, a total of 19,442 pregnant women were invited for IPV screening and 16,068 women (82.65%) completed the screening. More women in Spain screened positive for exposure to IPV (350/2055, 17.03%) than in Denmark (1195/14,013, 8.53%). Among the women who screened positive, only 31.39% (485/1545) were eligible to receive the intervention with only 104 (21.4%) of these women ultimately receiving it. Digital screening for IPV among pregnant women is feasible in an antenatal care context in Denmark and Spain; however, a digital supportive intervention during pregnancy appears to have limited feasibility as only a minor subgroup of women who screened positive for eligibility received the intervention. More research is needed on how to best support pregnant women exposed to IPV if universal IPV screening is to be implemented in antenatal care.

Screening for and Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence in the United States Before, During, and After Pregnancy, 2016-2019.

Objectives. To measure rates of intimate partner violence (IPV) screening during the perinatal period among people experiencing physical violence in the United States. Methods. We used 2016-2019 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System data (n = 158 338) to describe the incidence of physical IPV before or during pregnancy. We then assessed the prevalence of IPV screening before, during, or after pregnancy and predictors of receiving screening among those reporting violence. Results. Among the 3.5% (n = 6259) of respondents experiencing violence, 58.7%, 26.9%, and 48.3% were not screened before, during, or after pregnancy, respectively. Those reporting Medicaid or no insurance at birth, American Indian/Alaska Native people, and Spanish-speaking Hispanic people faced increased risk of not having a health care visit during which screening might occur. Among those attending a health care visit, privately insured people, rural residents, and non-Hispanic White respondents faced increased risk of not being screened. Conclusions. Among birthing people reporting physical IPV, nearly half were not screened for IPV before or after pregnancy. Public health efforts to improve maternal health must address both access to care and universal screening for IPV. (Am J Public Health. 2023;113(3):297-305. https://doi.org/10.2105/10.2105/AJPH.2022.307195).

Intimate Partner Violence at a Level-1 Trauma Center During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.

Risks of intimate partner violence (IPV) escalated during the COVID-19 pandemic given mitigation measures, socioeconomic hardships, and isolation concerns. The objective of this study was to explore the impact of COVID-19 on the incidence of IPV. We conducted an interrupted time series analysis for IPV incidence at a single level 1 trauma center located in the United States. IPV cases were identified by triangulation of institutional data sources. There were 4,624 traumatic injuries of which 292 (6.3%) were due to IPV. IPV-related injury admissions increased 17% in the weeks following the COVID lockdown (RR = 1.17; 95% CI: 1.16, 1.19). Over a quarter of victims (27.4%) were male. Compared to before COVID, victims of IPV during the pandemic were younger (p = .04); no difference in mechanism or severity of injury was found. Our results suggest an ongoing need for universal IPV screening during health emergencies to avoid missed opportunities for IPV detection and referral to support services.

15215 Female sex worker experiences with intimate partner violence screening by health care providers

ABSTRACT IMPACT: This work will inform the need for more trauma-informed approaches to violence screenings among marginalized populations by health care providers. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Female sex workers (FSW) experience high rates of intimate partner violence (IPV) which may have negative reproductive health consequences. Routine IPV screening by healthcare providers (HCP) is recommended. This study examines how FSW experience IPV assessments by HCP. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This qualitative descriptive study is nested within EMERALD, a longitudinal cohort study of street-based FSW. EMERALD assesses a structural community-level intervention on HIV and STI risks among FSW. Participants were recruited for EMERALD using time-location sampling to identify a sampling frame of venues and times where sex work is likely to occur. Inclusion criteria for this qualitative study include: participating in EMERALD, age 18-49, and willingness to participate in one phone interview. Twenty-two semi-structured individual qualitative interviews were conducted. Two coders, using thematic analysis, applied deductive codes and inductive coding to identify themes. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Three themes emerged from participant interviews regarding IPV screening. Inconsistent screening practices: Despite frequent reproductive health visits among participants, many women did not recall IPV screening by a HCP. Stigma as a barrier to disclosure: Women described feeling judged by HCP regarding their frequency of visits for reproductive concerns, sex work, and substance use and did not trust disclosing violence to HCP. Transactional health encounters: During visits, HCP were focused on addressing women’s immediate concerns; if the HCP did ask about IPV women felt the questions were asked part of a required protocol and not driven by a concern to deeply understand their lives. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS: FSW described inconsistent IPV screening practices by HPC. Participants expressed feeling stigmatized by HCP and that encounters with HCP did not foster trust for women to disclose IPV experiences. There is a need for HPC training in universal IPV screening focused on relationship and trust building to facilitate disclosure.

Women's Intention to Consent to Universal Screening for Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) at Well Baby Clinics.

The Israeli Ministry of Health requires medical and nursing staff in both hospitals and community settings, screen all women for Intimate Partner Violence (IPV). This study explored factors associated with the intention of Israeli women to consent to universal IPV screening during their visits to well baby clinics, using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Two hundred Jewish women of childbearing age completed a questionnaire based on the TPB. Only 52% of the women reported that they had undergone IPV screening conducted by nurses at well baby clinics in the last year. The TPB was found to predict 44% of the variance in women's intention to consent to universal IPV screening, whereas control beliefs, perceived behavioral control, and normative beliefs with regard to universal screening, were found to be the most significant predictors. These findings may help design interventions aimed at raising women's intentions to consent to universal IPV screening.

Intimate partner violence, pregnancy intention and contraceptive use in Honduras

Objective(s)We explored the relationship between Intimate Partner Violence (IPV), pregnancy intention and contraceptive use in Honduras. Study designWe used the most recent Honduras Demographic and Health Survey (DHS 2011–2012) data to examine the relationship between physical IPV, sexual IPV and emotional IPV with pregnancy intention; contraceptive use; and husband's knowledge of contraceptive use among a sample of 6629 women. Multiple logistic regression was used to estimate effects of IPV on the outcomes, controlling for empowerment indicators and socio-demographic variables. ResultsAmong currently married women with at least one living child born within the past 5 years, IPV was significantly associated with several outcomes. Women reporting any physical IPV (13.5%) were less likely to have wanted their last child (aOR: 0.52, p<.001) or to desire future children (aOR: 0.76, p=.002), and more likely to have ever used contraception (aOR: 2.32 p=.004). Those reporting physical with sexual violence (4.1%) were less likely to have wanted their last child (aOR: 0.59, p=.016). Women reporting emotional IPV (27.4%) were less likely to have wanted their last child (aOR: 0.56, p<.001) or to desire more children (aOR: 0.81, p<.001) and more likely to have ever used (aOR: 1.78, p<.001) and currently be using contraception (aOR: 1.19, p=.006). Conclusion(s)IPV was associated with both unwanted pregnancy and increased contraceptive use among married Honduran women. Universal screening for IPV among women who seek SRH services in Honduras may help identify women in need and reduce stigma around IPV while improving SRH outcomes. ImplicationsHonduran women exposed to intimate partner violence (IPV) were more likely to have ever used contraception yet more likely to report an unwanted pregnancy. Universal screening for IPV among women seeking sexual and reproductive health services may help identify women in need and reduce stigma around IPV while improving outcomes.

Intimate partner violence as a predictor of antenatal care service utilization in Honduras

ABSTRACTObjectiveTo describe the relationship between exposure to physical and/or sexual intimate partner violence (IPV) and indicators of antenatal care (ANC) service utilization among Honduran women of reproductive age.MethodsData from the 2011-2012 Honduras Demographic and Health Survey were analyzed to describe the relationship between self-reported exposure to IPV and two ANC outcomes: (1) sufficient ANC visits (defined by the Honduran Ministry of Health as five or more visits) and (2) early ANC initiation (within the first trimester). Multiple logistic regression was used to estimate effects of physical and sexual IPV on the outcomes, controlling for women’s age, education, literacy, residence, household size, religion, parity, wealth, husband’s age, and husband’s education.ResultsOf women who were married, had at least one living child 5 years or younger, and completed the IPV module (N = 6 629), 13.5% of them reported any physical IPV, and 4.1% reported both physical and sexual IPV. There was no significant association between IPV and early ANC; however, a significant relationship between IPV and sufficient ANC was found. Women who experienced any physical IPV (adjusted odds ratios (aOR) = 1.25; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00-1.56) or sexual IPV (aOR = 1.53; 95% CI: 1.08-2.16) were, respectively, 25% and 53% more likely to receive insufficient ANC.ConclusionsHonduras has one of highest rates of interpersonal violence of any nation in the world. In Honduras, IPV is a contributor to this broader category of interpersonal violence as well as a risk factor for insufficient ANC. Our findings suggest that universal IPV screening during ANC as well as future initiatives aimed at reducing IPV might improve ANC utilization in the country.

Using Game Theory to Understand Screening for Domestic Violence Under the TANF Family Violence Option

Universal screening for domestic violence in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program is required by most states, but its implementation is questionable. This paper employs game theory to conceptualize interactions between TANF applicants and frontline eligibility caseworkers. The intended outcomes of universal screening for intimate partner violence (IPV) – granting of a good cause waiver to IPV victims – are valid only by the assumption that caseworkers perform their roles. To grant a good cause waiver, TANF applicants and caseworkers should exchange two types of information: 1) disclosure of abuse by IPV victims and 2) notification of the availability of good cause waivers by caseworkers. This paper illuminates that intended outcomes of universal screening for IPV are difficult to achieve and discusses the applicability and limitations of game theory for policy evaluation.

Prenatal screening for intimate partner violence: A qualitative meta-synthesis

AimThe aim of this meta-synthesis was to glean an understanding of healthcare providers' experience with prenatal screening for intimate partner violence (IPV). BackgroundPrenatal screening guidelines for IPV are in place; however, a gap exists between these recommendations and providers' practices. MethodsNoblit and Hare's (1988) approach to synthesizing qualitative research studies was utilized. Eight research reports were identified and produced a sample of 142 experienced women's healthcare providers from the United States, New Zealand, and Sweden. ResultsThe synthesis revealed five overarching themes: (1) therapeutic relationship, (2) understanding what she is not saying, (3) presence of partner, (4) variations of how and when to discuss, and (5) “lost in the maze” of disclosure. When analyzed as a whole, the five themes contribute to a lack of universal screening for IPV. ConclusionsGiven that IPV is a social problem with long-term negative sequela, providers are poised to identify women during the perinatal timeframe to ensure adequate referrals and services to stop the cycle of violence.

Discussions About Intimate Partner Violence During Prenatal Care in the United States: The Role of Race/Ethnicity and Insurance Status

Over 1.5 million women are physically, sexually, and emotionally abused by intimate partners in the U.S. each year. Despite the severe health consequences and costs associated with intimate partner violence (IPV), most health providers fail to assess patients for abuse. It was of interest to examine the occurrence of IPV discussions during prenatal care (PNC) visits among women who experienced IPV. This study analyzed data from the 2004-2008 National Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System which included 195,687 women who delivered a live birth in the U.S. IPV victimization was measured using four items that addressed physical abuse by a current or former husband/partner in the 12 months before or during pregnancy. Responses were categorized as preconception, prenatal, preconception and prenatal, and preconception and/or prenatal IPV. The outcome was IPV discussions by health providers during PNC. Separate logistic regression models provided odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Women who reported prenatal IPV were less likely to have IPV discussions during PNC (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.70-0.94). Results were similar for women experiencing IPV during the prenatal and preconception periods. Among racial/ethnic minorities, women who experienced preconception IPV were less likely to have discussions about IPV during PNC. Further, Medicaid recipients who reported preconception and/or prenatal IPV were less likely to report IPV discussions (OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.69-0.82). This study underscores a public health problem and missed opportunity to connect battered victims to necessary services and care. It elucidates the state of current clinical practice and better informs policies on incorporating universal IPV screening.

Transforming the healthcare response to intimate partner violence and taking best practices to scale.

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is prevalent among adolescent and adult women, with significant physical, sexual, and mental health consequences. In 2011, the Institute of Medicine's Clinical Preventive Services for Women consensus report recommended universal screening for violence as a component of women's preventive services; this policy has been adopted by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). These policy developments require that effective clinic-based interventions be identified, easily implemented, and taken to scale. To foster dialogue about implementing effective interventions, we convened a symposium entitled "Responding to Violence Against Women: Emerging Evidence, Implementation Science, and Innovative Interventions," on May 21, 2012. Drawing on multidisciplinary expertise, the agenda integrated data on the prevalence and health impact of IPV violence, with an overview of the implementation science framework, and a panel of innovative IPV screening interventions. Recommendations were generated for developing, testing, and implementing clinic-based interventions to reduce violence and mitigate its health impact. The strength of evidence supporting specific IPV screening interventions has improved, but the optimal implementation and dissemination strategies are not clear. Implementation science, which seeks to close the evidence to program gap, is a useful framework for improving screening and intervention uptake and ensuring the translation of research findings into routine practice. Findings have substantial relevance to the broader research, clinical, and practitioner community. Our conference proceedings fill a timely gap in knowledge by informing practitioners as they strive to implement universal IPV screening and guiding researchers as they evaluate the success of implementing IPV interventions to improve women's health and well-being.

Pregnancy and Intimate Partner Violence: How Do Rural, Low-Income Women Cope?

We conducted 32 in-depth interviews with 20 rural, low-income, women residing in the United States who were pregnant (n = 12) or 3 months postpartum (n = 8) and had experienced intimate partner violence (IPV). Using purposive sampling and the grounded theory method, we generated a conceptual model of coping. The urge to protect the unborn baby was the primary influence for participants’ decisions about separating from or permanently leaving an abusive relationship. Implications include universal screening for IPV in child-bearing women, inquiry into maternal identity development during pregnancy, and improved resource access for rural, low-income women.

Intimate Partner Violence: Screening and Intervention in the Health Care Setting

The prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) has been documented in numerous populations and cultures. IPV is a universal social problem that affects individuals, families, and communities throughout the world. Research supports the idea that victims of IPV view health care providers as a source of help. However, nurses report feelings of inadequacy in their ability to screen for IPV. This quality improvement project was undertaken to increase awareness of IPV by educating nursing staff working in the health care setting. The educational program was evaluated through pretests and posttests. A universal IPV screening question was added to the hospital admission intake procedure. Through retrospective chart reviews before and after the educational session, screening for IPV by the nursing staff was evaluated by examination of disclosure rates and referral data. Populations served or affected include nurses and ultimately victims of IPV. The findings support the idea that an educational program can increase nurses' confidence and competency in screening for IPV. The results of chart review will determine whether there is a significant change in behavior relative to the increase in knowledge. Additional measures may be needed to enhance nurses' screening and interventional work with patients regarding IPV victimization.

Universal Screening for Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is known to be prevalent among therapy-seeking populations. Yet, despite a growing understanding of the dynamics of IPV and of the acceptability of screening, universal screening practices have not been systematically adopted in family therapy settings. A rapidly growing body of research data-almost entirely conducted in medical settings-has investigated attitudes and practices regarding universal screening for IPV. This article is a systematic review of the IPV universal screening research literature. The review summarizes literature related to IPV screening rates and practices, factors associated with provider screening practice, the role of training and institutional support on screening practice, impact of screening on disclosure rates, client beliefs and preferences for screening, and key safety considerations and screening competencies. Implications for family therapy and recommendations for further inquiry and screening model development are provided.

A Qualitative Study of Intimate Partner Violence Universal Screening by Family Therapy Interns: Implications for Practice, Research, Training, and Supervision

Although a few family therapy researchers and clinicians have urged universal screening for intimate partner violence (IPV), how screening is implemented-and, in particular, client and therapist response to screening-is vaguely defined and largely untested. This qualitative study examined the dilemmas experienced by couples and family therapy interns when implementing universal screening for IPV in an outpatient clinic setting. Twenty-two graduate students in a COAMFTE-accredited program were interviewed using qualitative research methods grounded in phenomenology. Three domains, 7 main themes, and 26 subthemes were identified. The three domains that emerged in this study include (a) therapist practice of universal screening, (b) client response to universal screening, and (c) therapist response to universal screening. Implications for practice, research, training, and supervision are discussed.

Attitudes About Intimate Partner Violence Screening Among an Ethnically Diverse Sample of Young Women

Purpose This clinic-based study investigated attitudes about intimate partner violence (IPV) screening among an ethnically diverse population of adolescent and young adult women (n = 645). Methods A cross-sectional quantitative and qualitative survey assessed experiences with and attitudes toward IPV screening. Results Almost all participants supported universal IPV screening and over 90% believed that a health care provider was the most appropriate adult to ask them about interpersonal violence. Young women’s concerns toward screening varied by age and violence experience; those most likely to mind being screened were younger, had a history of childhood sexual abuse, and were victims of physical violence in the last year. However, even in these groups, over 70% supported IPV screening. Qualitative analyses suggested that provider qualities and confidentiality will affect the amount of disclosure to provider-initiated screening. Women also raised important questions about how to define IPV in relationships. Conclusions Young women generally favor universal screening of interpersonal violence, but provider qualities and confidentiality issues affect responses to screening questions.