Universal Genetic Testing Research Articles

Histomorphology of pancreatic cancer in patients with inherited ATM serine/threonine kinase pathogenic variants

Germline pathogenic variants in the ATM serine/threonine kinase (ATM) gene are associated with an increased risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. It is important to identify germline ATM pathogenic variants in pancreatic cancer patients because these alterations are potentially targetable with chemotherapeutic drugs and/or radiation and have implications for other family members. As germline pathogenic variants in other genes have been associated with distinct histologic subtypes of pancreatic cancer, we studied the histomorphology of pancreatic cancer in 23 patients with germline ATM pathogenic variants. The histologic subtype was ductal adenocarcinoma in 19/23 (83%) of the patients, adenosquamous carcinoma in 1/23 (4%), and colloid (mucinous non-cystic) carcinoma in 3/23 (13%). The percentage of colloid (mucinous non-cystic) carcinomas is higher than we have previously observed in patients with familial and sporadic pancreatic cancer (1 and 2% in prior reports, p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). Three carcinomas (2 colloid carcinomas, 1 ductal adenocarcinoma) arose in association with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Among the resected pancreata, non-invasive precursor lesions, including pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and incipient intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, were identified in 83%. We conclude that pancreatic cancers in patients with germline ATM pathogenic variants are more frequently of colloid (mucinous non-cystic) morphology but are overall morphologically diverse supporting the utility of universal germline genetic testing for patients with pancreatic cancer.

Costs and benefits of tumor testing for BRCA mutations in high-grade serous ovarian cancer as a companion diagnostic for PARP inhibitor treatment

Objective: Women with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC) have a 1 in 5 chance of carrying a BRCA mutation and are eligible for germline testing, but this testing will miss some women with a somatic mutation in their tumor. Testing HGSC tissue for BRCA mutations (tumor testing) could identify those with either a germline or somatic mutation, who could be treated with a PARP inhibitor. The objective was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis to compare universal genetic (germline) testing to tumor testing as a companion diagnostic for PARP inhibitor treatment.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of universal genetic testing for common hereditary cancer mutations in women compared with family history-based testing

Objective: Identifying patients who would benefit from hereditary cancer genetic testing by family history alone can miss a significant portion of both BRCA and Lynch mutation carriers. The purpose of this study is to determine whether population-based testing with a common hereditary cancer panel in all women regardless of family history is a cost-effective cancer prevention strategy.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of universal genetic testing for common hereditary cancer mutations in women compared with family-history based testing

A cost-effectiveness analysis of universal genetic testing for common hereditary cancer mutations in women compared with family-history based testing

Unselected germline screening in pancreatic adenocarcinoma yields high rates of pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants (PV) in hereditary cancer susceptibility genes.

1582 Background: Recent literature cites a germline mutation rate of 3.9-15.1% in patients diagnosed with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) depending on breadth of genes tested, pre-selection of high-risk history and population substructure. True incidence of germline mutations in PDAC is unknown in unselected population. Methods: All patients (pts) diagnosed with PDAC in the province of British Columbia, Canada and referred to the Hereditary Cancer Program, were eligible to undergo 30 gene Color saliva kit testing under a research protocol, or clinical multigene testing if they met existing local criteria regardless of whether they signed on to the protocol. Any healthcare provider or patients themselves could refer. Results: 243 pts were referred between August 2016 and October 2018 but 25.1% (61) declined and 9.1% (22) died before testing. Of the 141 pts who consented to research protocol and completed germline testing, median age was 64 (46.1-81.0), 68.8% were European, 1.4% Ashkenazi Jewish heritage, 42% male, 61% non-smoker, 24.1% had personal history of a second cancer and 39% had metastatic disease. Baseline characteristics were similar between the PV positive and uninformative group. 20/25 PV were in known PDAC susceptibility genes with cascade screening implications (ATM (9), BRCA2 (4), BRCA2/ATM (1), CDKN2A (4), and MSH2 (2)). Excluding the 3 PV identified through carrier testing (1) and prior research identification (2), the rate of PV in unselected, unrelated PDAC cohort is 22/138 (15.9%). Utilizing previous NCCN criteria for BRCA1/BRCA2 testing or for familial pancreatic cancer did not appear to select for patients with higher risk of PV positive (12/65 (18.4%) PV positive rate versus 13/76 (17.1%) in those that didn’t meet criteria). Previous criteria would have missed 52% (13/25) PV in ATM (6), BRCA2/ATM (1), BRCA2 (2), MSH2 (2), NBN (1), CHEK2 (1). To date, a third of families with PV identified have accessed cascade testing in 38 relatives. Conclusions: Given the high incidence of 15.9% PV in hereditary cancer susceptibility genes, our data support recommendations for universal germline genetic testing of PDAC pts.

Disseminating universal genetic testing to a diverse, indigent patient population at a county hospital gynecologic oncology clinic

ObjectiveThe universal genetic testing initiative (UGTI) is a quality improvement effort to increase rates of guideline-based genetic counseling (GC) and genetic testing (GT) of patients with potentially hereditary cancers. The UGTI was disseminated to a county hospital gynecologic oncology clinic that serves a diverse, indigent patient population. MethodsUsing the Model for Improvement quality improvement framework, interventions including integrated GC, clinic tracking, assisted GC referrals, and provider education were tested over 26 months. A retrospective data review included patients with high-grade, non-mucinous epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers (HGOC) and endometrial cancers (EC) diagnosed between 9/1/12–8/31/16. Statistical analyses were performed to describe the population and to evaluate rates of recommendation and use of immunohistochemistry tumor testing (IHC), GC, and GT. ResultsA cohort of 241 patients (57 HGOC, 184 EC) were included. At the conclusion of the study 84.2% of HGOC patients were referred for GC, 89.6% (43/48) completed GC, and 90.7% (39/43) completed GT. Of EC patients, 81.0% were recommended to have IHC and 62.4% (93/149) completed IHC. Patients with HGOC diagnosed during dissemination of UGTI were significantly more likely to receive a recommendation for GC (p = 0.02) and to complete GT (p = 0.03) than those diagnosed before UGTI. Patients with EC were significantly more likely to complete IHC if diagnosed after UGTI than those diagnosed prior to dissemination (p < 0.001). ConclusionsThe UGTI can be adapted to increase use of guideline-based cancer genetics services in a diverse, indigent, gynecologic cancer patient population.

AACR White Paper: Shaping the Future of Cancer Prevention - A Roadmap for Advancing Science and Public Health.

The recent pace, extent, and impact of paradigm-changing cancer prevention science has been remarkable. The American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) convened a 3-day summit, aligned with five research priorities: (i) Precancer Atlas (PCA). (ii) Cancer interception. (iii) Obesity-cancer linkage, a global epidemic of chronic low-grade inflammation. (iv) Implementation science. (v) Cancer disparities. Aligned with these priorities, AACR co-led the Lancet Commission to formally endorse and accelerate the NCI Cancer Moonshot program, facilitating new global collaborative efforts in cancer control. The expanding scope of creative impact is perhaps most startling-from NCI-funded built environments to AACR Team Science Awarded studies of Asian cancer genomes informing global primary prevention policies; cell-free epigenetic marks identifying incipient neoplastic site; practice-changing genomic subclasses in myeloproliferative neoplasia (including germline variant tightly linked to JAK2 V617F haplotype); universal germline genetic testing for pancreatic cancer; and repurposing drugs targeting immune- and stem-cell signals (e.g., IL-1β, PD-1, RANK-L) to cancer interception. Microbiota-driven IL-17 can induce stemness and transformation in pancreatic precursors (identifying another repurposing opportunity). Notable progress also includes hosting an obesity special conference (connecting epidemiologic and molecular perspectives to inform cancer research and prevention strategies), co-leading concerted national implementation efforts in HPV vaccination, and charting the future elimination of cancer disparities by integrating new science tools, discoveries and perspectives into community-engaged research, including targeted counter attacks on e-cigarette ad exploitation of children, Hispanics and Blacks. Following this summit, two unprecedented funding initiatives were catalyzed to drive cancer prevention research: the NCI Cancer Moonshot (e.g., PCA and disparities); and the AACR-Stand Up To Cancer bold "Cancer Interception" initiative.

Successful implementation of universal genetic testing in a county hospital gynecologic oncology clinic: A quality improvement initiative

Successful implementation of universal genetic testing in a county hospital gynecologic oncology clinic: A quality improvement initiative

Implementing universal genetic counseling (GC) and multigene germline testing (MGT) for pancreatic cancer (PC) patients (pts).

1512Background: MGT will identify cancer susceptibility gene variants in 4-10% of unselected PC pts. Such data have prompted calls for universal GC and MGT of all PC pts, but the real-world benefit...

Implementation of a quality improvement project for universal genetic testing in women with ovarian cancer

ObjectiveThe National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends all women with ovarian cancer be offered genetic testing. Despite a decade of endorsement, many oncology practitioners have yet to make this a part of routine practice. Referral to genetic counseling and completion of genetic testing among patients at substantial risk of germline mutations are significantly lacking, adversely affecting patient care and squandering an opportunity to maximize cancer prevention efforts. This project determined the impact and feasibility of implementing a basic model for universal referral to genetic counseling and completion of genetic testing in women with a diagnosis of ovarian cancer in an academic gynecology oncology practice with access to electronic health records (EHRs). MethodsPatients diagnosed with ovarian cancer from January 2008 to November 2013 were retrospectively reviewed to determine the baseline referral rate for genetic counseling and testing completion in our practice. Implementation of a process change model combining provider training, patient education, enhanced electronic health record documentation and improved patient appointment scheduling strategies were implemented. We then prospectively collected data on all newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients that had not already undergone genetic testing presenting from December 1, 2013 to November 30, 2016. ResultsGenetic referral rates, genetic counseling and testing completion rates were markedly improved. Pre-implementation our genetic testing rate was 27% and post implementation our testing rate was 82% (p-value≤0.001). ConclusionsLow cost interventions that target education of both providers and patients regarding the importance of genetic testing along with utilization of the EHR and streamlined patient appointment services can significantly increase rates of genetic testing completion.

Universal genetic testing for inherited susceptibility in children and adults with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia: are we there yet?

Comprehensive genomic profiling of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases have enabled the detection and differentiation of driver and subclonal mutations, informed risk prognostication, and defined targeted therapies. These insights into disease biology, and management have made multigene-acquired mutation testing a critical part of the diagnostic assessment of patients with sporadic MDS and AML. More recently, our understanding of the role of an increasing number of inherited genetic factors on MDS/AML risk and management has rapidly progressed. In recognition of the growing impact of this field, clinical guidelines and disease classification systems for both MDS and AML have recently incorporated familial MDS/AML predisposition syndromes into their diagnostic algorithms. In this perspective piece, we contemplate the advantages, disadvantages, and barriers that would need to be overcome to incorporate inherited MDS/AML genetic testing into the upfront molecular diagnostic work-up of every MDS/AML patient. For centers already performing panel-based tumor-only testing, including genes associated with familial forms of MDS/AML (e.g., RUNX1, CEBPA, GATA2, TP53), we advocate optimizing these tests to detect all types of germline variants in these genes and moving toward upfront paired tumor/germline testing to maximize detection and streamline patient care.

Precision Oncology and "Molecular Tumor Boards" - Concepts, Chances and Challenges

Recent developments in genomics allow a more and more comprehensive genetic analysis of human malignancies, and have sparked hopes that this will contribute to the development of novel targeted, effective and well-tolerated therapies.While targeted therapies have improved the prognosis of many cancer patients with certain tumor types, "precision oncology" also brings along new challenges. Highly personalized treatment strategies require new strategies for clinical trials and translation into routine clinical practice. We review the current technical approaches for "universal genetic testing" in cancer, and potential pitfalls in the interpretation of such data. We then provide an overview of the available evidence supporting treatment strategies based on extended genetic analysis. Based on the available data, we conclude that "precision oncology" approaches that go beyond the current standard of care should be pursued within the framework of an interdisciplinary "molecular tumor board", and preferably within clinical trials.

Ovarialkarzinom: häufiger Gendiagnostik bei strukturiertem Management

Bednar EM et al. A universal genetic testing initiative for patients with high-grade, non-mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer and the implications for cancer treatment. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 146: 399 – 404

A universal genetic testing initiative for patients with high-grade, non-mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer and the implications for cancer treatment

ObjectiveGenetic counseling (GC) and germline genetic testing (GT) for BRCA1 and BRCA2 are considered standard of care for patients with high-grade, non-mucinous epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers (HGOC). We describe a universal genetic testing initiative to increase the rates of recommendation and acceptance of GC and GT to >80% for patients with HGOC at our institution. MethodsData from a consecutive cohort of patients seen in our gynecologic oncology clinics between 9/1/2012 and 8/31/2015 for evaluation of HGOC were retrospectively analyzed. Data were abstracted from the tumor registry, medical records, and research databases. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate patient characteristics and GC, GT, and PARP inhibitor use. Various clinic interventions were developed, influenced by the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle method, which included physician-coordinated GT, integrated GC, and assisted GC referrals. ResultsA cohort of 1636 patients presented to the gynecologic oncology clinics for evaluation of HGOC during our study period, and 1423 (87.0%) were recommended to have GC and GT. Of these, 1214 (85.3%) completed GT and 217 (17.9%) were found to have a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Among BRCA-positive patients, 167 had recurrent or progressive disease, and 56 of those received PARP inhibitor therapy. ConclusionsThe rates of GC and GT recommendation and completion among patients with HGOC at our institution exceeded 80% following the implementation of a universal genetic testing initiative. Universal genetic testing of patients with HGOC is one strategy to identify those who may benefit from PARP inhibitor therapy.

Multi-disciplinary summit on genetics services for women with gynecologic cancers: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology White Paper

ObjectiveTo assess current practice, advise minimum standards, and identify educational gaps relevant to genetic screening, counseling, and testing of women affected by gynecologic cancers. MethodsThe Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) organized a multidisciplinary summit that included representatives from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), the American Society Clinical Oncology (ASCO), the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC), and patient advocacy groups, BrightPink and Facing our Risk of Cancer Empowered (FORCE). Three subject areas were discussed: care delivery models for genetic testing, barriers to genetic testing, and educational opportunities for providers of genetic testing. ResultsThe group endorsed current SGO, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), and NSGC genetic testing guidelines for women affected with ovarian, tubal, peritoneal cancers, or DNA mismatch repair deficient endometrial cancer. Three main areas of unmet need were identified: timely and universal genetic testing for women with ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers; education regarding minimum standards for genetic counseling and testing; and barriers to implementation of testing of both affected individuals as well as cascade testing of family members. Consensus building among all stakeholders resulted in an action plan to address gaps in education of gynecologic oncology providers and delivery of cancer genetics care.

Universal BRCA1/BRCA2 Testing for Ovarian Cancer Patients is Welcomed, but with Care: How Women and Staff Contextualize Experiences of Expanded Access.

Decreasing costs of genetic testing and advances in treatment for women with cancer with germline BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations have heralded more inclusive genetic testing programs. The Genetic Testing in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (GTEOC) Study, investigates the feasibility and acceptability of offering genetic testing to all women recently diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer (universal genetic testing or UGT). Study participants and staff were interviewed to: (i) assess the impact of UGT (ii) integrate patients' and staff perspectives in the development of new UGT programs. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with twelve GTEOC Study participants and five members of staff involved in recruiting them. The transcripts were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. There are two super-ordinate themes: motivations and influences around offers of genetic testing and impacts of genetic testing in ovarian cancer patients. A major finding is that genetic testing is contextualized within the broader experiences of the women; the impact of UGT was minimized in comparison with the ovarian cancer diagnosis. Women who consent to UGT are motivated by altruism and by their relatives' influence, whilst those who decline are often considered overwhelmed or fearful. Those without a genetic mutation are usually reassured by this result, whilst those with a genetic mutation must negotiate new uncertainties and responsibilities towards their families. Our findings suggest that UGT in this context is generally acceptable to women. However, the period shortly after diagnosis is a sensitive time and some women are emotionally overburdened. UGT is considered a 'family affair' and staff must acknowledge this.

Dissemination of universal genetic testing to three unique oncology care settings.

1590 Background: Efforts are occurring across the United States to improve the rates of identification and standard of care genetic counseling (GC) and genetic testing (GT) of pts with breast and ovarian cancer. Following a successful quality improvement (QI) initiative to increase referrals and utilization of GC/GT among pts with breast and ovarian cancer to &gt;80% at our host site (HS), we sought to disseminate the QI project to three unique oncology care settings (OCS). Methods: The OCS described in the Table are certified members of the HS network, were strategically identified, and agreed to participate in the QI project. Genetic counselors at the HS and OCS built teams to plan and initiate the project. A 130-item environmental scan was created by the HS team to assess OCS structure, resources, and GC/GT processes. OCS teams completed the environmental scan and a semi-structured interview with the HS; and from this, barriers to GC/GT were identified, then categorized using Ishikawa diagrams. Clinical interventions were designed to address these barriers. Resulting QI protocols follow the PDSA-cycle QI model. A database was built for retrospective and prospective data collection of eligible pts and rates of GC/GT referral and completion from 2015-2018. Results: Although unique barriers were identified at each OCS, all identified: pt referral/scheduling issues, technology and electronic medical record system inefficiencies, and inconsistent physician referral/GT practices. OCS interventions include: implementation of physician-coordinated GT, GC within chemo infusion suites, physician education sessions, GC scheduling improvements, creation of pt education documents, and development of referral tracking processes. Conclusions: Genetic counselors collaborated, planned, and initiated dissemination of a QI project to improve GC/GT utilization at three unique OCS. QI interventions were developed to address the unique environment and barriers at each OCS. [Table: see text]

Approach to Lynch Syndrome for the Gastroenterologist.

Lynch syndrome is an autosomal-dominant hereditary cancer syndrome. Mutations in mismatch repair genes, including MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2, are implicated in the pathogenesis of the syndrome through microsatellite instability (MSI) and a rapid adenoma-carcinoma sequence. The primary methodologies for diagnosis include clinical criteria (Amsterdam I/II, Revised Bethesda Guidelines), computational models, and genetic testing (MSI, immunohistochemistry, germline testing). Universal genetic testing of colorectal cancers has gained popularity as a method to identify high-risk individuals and to offer appropriate cancer surveillance, psychological reassurance, and family planning. Management includes short-interval surveillance with colonoscopy in those without colorectal cancer and colectomy for those with cancer. Long-term chemoprevention with aspirin may improve mortality.

Universal Genetic Testing for Younger Patients With Colorectal Cancer

Universal Genetic Testing for Younger Patients With Colorectal Cancer

Achieving universal BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing with a novel care delivery model

Achieving universal BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing with a novel care delivery model