President Of The United States Research Articles

The Art of Leadership: Analysing Rhetorics in the Linguistic Strategies of the 2020 US Presidential Election

The Art of Leadership: Analysing Rhetorics in the Linguistic Strategies of the 2020 US Presidential Election

Ideological and Linguistic Features Analyses of US Presidential Written Discourse addressing Immigration and Terrorism Issues

The aims of this study seeks to examine the underlying linguistics features and ideological concept found in the political speech of American EX President, with a specific emphasis on tweets related to Islamophobia and immigration. The study employs a descriptive and interpretive research design. The corpus of the study consisted of 50 purposely selected Tweets, spanning from 2nd January 2015 to 20th May 2020. Data analysis were conducted using Fairclough's ten-question model (1993). It is found that Trump strategically employed his presidential authority to target Islam and immigration, portraying them as the root cause of terrorism and economic challenges. Trump employed favourable terms while referring to Americans and his supporters, while associating Islam and immigrants with unfavourable descriptors. The findings of this study revealed that Trump employed hyperbole to magnify the perceived threat posed by Islam and immigrants. Trump predominantly employed modal verbs expressing certainty rather than those indicating likelihood in order to demonstrate authority. The future and simple present tenses were commonly used to depict the current threat posed by immigration and the terrorism perpetrated by Islamic groups. The comparative and superlative forms were employed to compare the current state of brightness in the US with its past. The pronouns "we, our, us" were used most frequently to convey a sense of oneness and reduce the perceived barrier between Trump and the audience. Declarative sentences were the most expressive and meaningful acts.

Emotions and the status quo: The anti-incumbency bias in political prediction markets

Emotions are often associated with politics, with new research confirming this connection. There is a link between negative emotions and political actions that oppose an incumbent candidate or party. We examine whether this “anti-incumbency” bias extends to political prediction markets, where such emotions can conflict with economic rationality. We analyze unique data from Media Predict, a commercial prediction market. Before a trade is executed, participants are asked to write a justification for their actions. Using text analysis, we measure the emotional sentiment of the justifications of traders buying contracts predicting a change in the incumbent candidate or party. Consistent with anti-incumbency bias, the justifications of buyers of a challenger contract had significantly more negative emotional sentiment scores. We document this finding in prediction markets associated with the 2012 US Presidential Election and the 2015 UK General Election. We conclude that, despite incentives to the contrary, traders’ actions in political stock markets are associated with strong emotions tied to incumbency status.

Hohe und weiter steigende Ungleichheit in den USA – politisch nicht gewollt und doch geduldet?

Abstract Looking at both the Gini coefficients ex-ante as well as at the Gini coefficients ex-post reveals that the distribution of personal incomes has become more unequal in the USA in the periods between 1947 and 2020. This paper investigates the possible underlying concepts of income distribution targets and argues, based on empirical findings, that neither clear electoral/partisan cycles nor station-arity (equilibrium) in the figures of income distribution of the USA can be detected. Instead, one observes an unbroken cyclical upward trend in inequality, which contributes significantly to the fission in the US society and economy. Surprisingly, as measured by the results produced by US presidents on the national level since 1947, the Republican Party and the Democratic Party have made similar contributions to lowering the inequality.

Energy Transition, fossil Fuels, and green Innovations: Paving the way to achieving sustainable development Goals in the United States

The United States, as the world's second-largest polluter, emitted a staggering 4.7 billion metric tonnes of carbon dioxide in 2020. During the Leaders’ Climate Summit, the US president articulated precise targets for combating climate change, notably a 50 to 52 percent reduction in net CO2 emissions from 2005 levels by 2030. Consequently, it becomes imperative to identify the pivotal factors that are driving this intensified dedication to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Hence, it is vibrant to determine the basic causes propelling the intensified interest in meeting SDGs 7 and 13. From this perspective, this study explores the dynamic link between energy transition, fossil fuel energy, green innovation, and economic complexity index on CO2 emissions and ecological footprint in the United States from 1980 to 2020. The dynamic Autoregressive-Distributed Lag (ARDL) simulations and Frequency Domain Causality (FDC) techniques are applied for long-medium and short-run causal association among the variables. Our empirical evidence shows that energy transition, fossil fuel energy, and economic complexity increase CO2 emissions and ecological footprint. On the other hand, green innovation reduces CO2 emissions and ecological impact only in the long term. The pragmatic outcomes suggest that authorities should inhibit Fossil Fuel Energy, concentrate on energy transitions, and include more renewable sources in the US energy mix. The findings would assist the United States in meeting SDGs 7 and 13.

A Data Analytics Strategy to the Underground Economy of Cybercrime

Massive cyberattacks and cybercrimes such as ransomware and distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks have become more and more of a danger, and individuals, organizations, and governments have struggled to discover effective means to defend against them. In 2017, the WannaCry ransomware was to blame for roughly 45,000 strikes across almost 100 nations. Governments have come under pressure to enhance their cybersecurity spending as a result of the increasing impact of cybercrime. In his fiscal year 2017 budget, United States President Barack Obama suggested investing more than $19 billion in cybersecurity, a rise of more than 35% from 2016.Thus, a new sort of organizationknown as the "cybercrime underground" has developed, one that both runs underground marketsand fosters the growth of cybercrime conspiracies. The threat posed by the emergence of highly skilled network-based cybercrime business models, such as Crimeware-as-a-Service (CaaS), is mostly invisible to governments, organizations, and individuals becausecybercrime networks are lateral, diffuse, fluid, and dynamic. Although cyber dangers are rapidly increasing, there hasn't been much research done on the methodology or theoretical underpinnings of the field that could help inform information systems researchers and practitioners whowork in the field of cyber security. Additionally, little is understood about Crime-as-a-Service (CaaS), the illegal business model that supports the underground world of cybercrime.

Tautology and Pleonasm in Political Interviews: A Semantic study

Pleonasm refers to the involvement of unnecessary words or morphemes represents pleonastic words which repeat a mentioned information elsewhere, whereas tautology refers to the inacceptable repetition of the same ideas, words, or phrases by using diverse words. In English, there is a perplexity to distinguish some elements that may be misled to be regarded as pleonastic or tautological. The current study aims at analysing two political interviews in the light of pleonasm and tautology concepts and find out the differences between them semantically. The data analysis is taken from two presidential interviews for the American presidents Trump and Biden in 2020. The study has concluded that tautology and pleonasm can be used in disparate degrees in political speeches. Using tautology is more necessary than pleonasm in political speeches, in which pleonasm concentrates on ideas and implied meaning, which can be misled to simple, ordinary people, while tautology is clear and can be understood by any simple brain in spite that it is dull and boring sometimes if the repetition is exaggerated, but can be perceived easily to focus on some important ideas the politician sees it is significant.

Leading through difficult times: The oral histories of Drs. Barbara Nichols, Beverly Malone, and Ernest Grant

The nursing profession, along with its respective professional organizations, has transcended through the vicissitudes of time. This includes, but is not limited to, the evolution of the profession and integration of African American nurses into nursing organizations and leadership roles. The three past African American presidents of the American Nurses Association were invited to participate in an oral history about their leadership and presidencies. The interviews were visual/audio-recorded, digitally taped, and transcribed. The oral histories centered on their journeys to becoming the president of the ANA, experiences being the president, leading beyond their presidency, and respective insights about their presidency.

A Study on Scope and Challenges in Network Marketing Business

Network Marketing also known as multi level marketing (MLM) or direct selling, is a business model that relies on a network of independent distributors or representations to sell products or services directly to consumers. Network Marketing, is a business model that involves the distribution of products or services through a network of independent distributors. In recent years, network marketing has gained popularity as a flexible and low-cost way for individuals to start their own businesses and earn income. Network Marketing is the Marketing Model to Promote Goods and Services to the end user. This Business model involves the sale of products or services through a network of distributors or independent representatives. The concept of network marketing has been around for decades, but it has gained popularity in recent years due to the growth of social media and the internet. Network Marketing is a marketing model which is used by companies to sell their products and services to the end user, Network marketing business has great impact in countries like USA, Japan, UK, Brazil, Italy, Germany, Canada etc. In all these countries lots of business legends and millionaires emerged as a result of their investment in multi-level marketing. Warren Buffett, Richard Branson, Dexter Yager and Birdie Yager, and even the US president Donald Trump are the spokesmen of network marketing as they derived a part of their wealth through the investment in network marketing. Network Marketing offers income potential and flexibility, but it also poses challenges such as a high failure rate, recruitment pressure, and regulatory scrutiny. Before getting involved in network marketing its essential to thoroughly research the company, understand the compensations plan, and consider your own skills and recourses. It’s not a guaranteed path to financial success, and success often depends on personal commitments, ethics, and specific MLM company’s reputation and product. In recent, the landscape of entrepreneurship and income generation in India has witnessed a remarkable transformation, with network marketing emerging as a prominent business model. India, a nation renowned for its diverse demographics, cultural richness, and rapidly expanding economy, presents an intriguing and complex arena for network marketing ventures. The industry has faced numbers of challenges, ranging from its legality and allegations of fraudulent operations to the economic diversity that characterizes the Indian parameters. This review paper embarks on a comprehensive exploration of the network marketing landscape in India, aiming to look over scope and challenges of this industry. This paper seeks to provide a nuanced understanding of an industry that has. As India's middle class and youth population continue to seek innovative income opportunities, it is paramount to assess the merits and pitfalls of network marketing. This review endeavours to contribute to the discourse by offering a balanced perspective that considers both the opportunities for financial empowerment and the potential risks for participants in this business model. Network Marketing has a dynamic nature, a sector constantly shaped by technological advancements, shifts in consumer behaviour, and evolving regulations. It strives to offer insights that can aid policymakers, entrepreneurs, scholars, and potential participants in making informed decisions regarding network marketing endeavours in India. We delve into the historical backdrop, regulatory landscape, socio-cultural factors, challenges, success stories, and future prospects that define network marketing in India. Through rigorous analysis and critical examination, we aim to shed light on the intricate tapestry of an industry that continues to be a significant player in the Indian entrepreneurial ecosystem. Network marketing business has both scope and challenges in the marketing environment. The organisation has potential to reach all the population of the country but also have some challenges to grow in the nation.

Analyzing Biden's Approach to Taiwan: Patterns of Continuity and Change

The study examines the US policy stance towards Taiwan during the Biden administration. By studying the broad contours of the policy, the article examines patterns of continuity or change in the policy of successive US administrations towards Taiwan. Within this context, the study analyzes how Taiwan has configured the US-China and cross-strait relations. Furthermore, given the disputed status of Taiwan, the study seeks to determine the prospects for stability or instability in the Asia-Pacific region. Incorporating structural realism as a theoretical framework, the article adopts a qualitative research methodology, using content analysis as a research tool. It employs primary and secondary data using archival research. Rhetorical euphoria has made Taipei a flashpoint in increasing US-China hostilities. The article argues that the US and China ignore the ‘peaceful resolution’ of the Taiwan dispute entailed in their historic agreements. The Shanghai Communiqué (1972), the Taiwan Relations Act (1979) and the Six Assurances in the U.S-China Joint Communiqué (1982) all laid emphasis on Taiwan's peaceful unification. Contrarily, Taipei's greater international integration, diplomatic and military protocol, and initiatives like the Taiwan Policy Act have revitalized Taiwan in Biden's Indo-Pacific security agenda. The US Taiwan Policy Act has alarmingly replaced ‘minimum defense’ with ‘asymmetric deterrence’ in order to defend Taiwan.

The Urgency of Expanding the Position and Functions of the Vice President in a Presidential System: A Study on Article 4 of the 1945 Constitution

This research highlights the role and position of the Vice President within Indonesia's presidential system, which remains ambiguous compared to the clearly defined role and authority of the President. The lack of clarity in the division of duties and the poorly defined role often lead to overlaps or gaps in the responsibilities that the Vice President should fulfill. This can result in uncertainty in decision-making and the implementation of government programs. The presence of a Vice President should ideally add an extra layer of accountability within the government. However, if their role is unclear, the public may find it difficult to assess their performance and to hold them accountable for their actions or decisions. When compared to other countries' constitutions, such as the United States and the Philippines, the role of the Vice President is more defined, but the role of the Indonesian Vice President appears to be more dependent on the President's policies. In the 1945 Constitution of Indonesia, the role of the Vice President is only broadly outlined in Article 4 paragraph (2) and Article 8. This ambiguity causes the Vice President's authority to depend on the President's policies. This research utilizes legal regulation, conceptual, and comparative approaches to understand the Vice President's position and powers. The research findings indicate that the Vice President's role is intended to assist the President and has a primary role in assuming the President's position in accordance with Article 8 of the 1945 Constitution. However, the Vice President's role does not have absolute authority as their power depends on the President's policies and preferences. This creates a complex dynamic between the President and the Vice President, with the Vice President's authority merely shadowing the President's power. Upon examining Article 4 of the 1945 Constitution, the Vice President's role should emulate that of the Vice President of the United States. According to this provision, the Vice President, with support from the Ministers, has the authority to declare the President's incapacity to exercise power and presidential duties, and conversely, the President can make statements contrary to the Vice President's statements, complementing each other.

A Comparative Discourse Analysis of Ferdinand Marcos Jr.’s and Joseph Biden Jr.’s Inaugural Speeches

This study aimed to analyze and describe the structure, concepts and language use of the inauguration speeches delivered by Philippine President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Romualdez Marcos Jr. and US President Joseph Robinette Biden Jr., as well as the reasons for their selection. The researchers used a descriptive and qualitative research design to extract data from the transcripts of the two speeches. The findings revealed that both presidents used similar speech structures during their inaugurations, acknowledging important people, recognizing the historical significance of their inaugurations, and expressing hope for the future of their countries. The study also identifies the implications of the content of the message in the inaugural speeches of the two presidents. President Biden Jr. focused on racial fairness, honesty, and unity, while President Marcos Jr. advocated unity and hope for the future. Both presidents employed directive speech acts to encourage certain behaviors and attitudes, illustrating their different leadership viewpoints. It is recommended for linguistics students to have further readings in the application of Speech Act in comparative discourse analysis for political speeches, teachers should encourage more students to conduct research, parents should be aware of the implications of political speeches, administrators should motivate students to conduct study using quantitative research, and future researchers should focus on developing a more nuanced understanding of the discourses used by political leaders in different contexts and investigating the impact of political discourses on public opinion.

Structural adjustment, economic performance, and electoral volatility in presidential elections in Latin America

AbstractDrawing upon the Latin American Presidential and Legislative Elections database and our own original data set, we assess the effects of structural adjustment and other economic factors on presidential electoral volatility in 24 Latin American countries in 1982–2016. The results of our study indicate that both structural adjustment and inflation have a positive association with Type B presidential electoral volatility (the volatility generated from changes in the vote shares of established parties). Economic growth appears to have only a weak negative association with overall presidential electoral volatility. Type A presidential electoral volatility (the volatility associated with the rise of new parties) is mostly determined by demographic factors and the electoral system for the presidency. As with legislative volatility in Latin America, Africa, and postcommunist Europe, explaining stable party presidential volatility appears more challenging than explaining party replacement presidential volatility. Overall, several of the findings about legislative volatility are echoed in this study, but presidential electoral volatility is notably higher than legislative volatility in Latin America.

Sending the B team: The impact of lesser signals of resolve

When signaling resolve, is it necessary to go ‘all-in’ and send the strongest possible signal or can sending a lesser signal be effective? Prior research suggests that sending a lesser signal is an admission of irresolution, akin to sending no signal. We make the novel claim that lesser signals of resolve can actually be worse for credibility than sending no signal, particularly in general deterrence situations. We theorize that while the absence of a signal may go unnoticed, a lesser signal puts a spotlight on irresolution. Building on prior findings that high-level visits can function as signals of extended deterrence commitment, we test our theory using new data on visits abroad by the US president, vice president, secretary of state, and secretary of defense. We find that only presidential visits are effective at deterring military challenges against the country visited. Visits by lesser officials, whom we dub the ‘B Team’, actually increase the risk of deterrence failure.

When Push Comes to Shove: An Experimental Analysis of Voter Support of a Woman President and the 2024 Nomination

A woman has not yet shattered the “hardest, highest glass ceiling” of the American presidency. Our research answers two questions: Which groups are more likely to believe electing a woman president to be historically important? (R1), and When a presidential election is at stake, who is likely to support a woman candidate? (R2). Using observational data ( n = 1075), our findings indicate that women, people who recognize sexism within politics, Democrats, and liberals are more likely to view a woman president as historic. Utilizing a list experiment of hypothetical 2024 presidential matchups, few who claimed to view a woman president as historic were willing to cast a vote in their favor. When push came to shove, Democratic women were the group most likely to vote for a woman presidential candidate. As parties look toward the future, this study offers insight into how voters respond to potential nominees and who parties will nominate.

Investigating Lexical and Syntactic Differences in Written and Spoken English Corpora

This paper presents an analysis of the differences between written text and the transcription of spoken text using current Natural Language Processing (NLP) methods. The purpose of the study is to investigate the long and rich history of attempts to differentiate spoken and written text in fields such as linguistics, communication, and rhetoric, which date back to the early 20th century. Given the availability of large quantities of machine-readable data and machine learning algorithms that can handle them, it is possible to use a large number of derived features. The research focuses on syntactic and lexical differences in written books and transcriptions of speeches by United States presidents. The analysis investigates morphological, lexical, syntactical, and text-level aspects. In this process, multiple features have been considered including lexical diversity, syllable count, frequency of parts of speech, and features relating to the parse tree, like the average length of noun phrases, and the use of interrogative sentences, among others. This study will enhance our understanding of the difference between written text and the transcription of spoken text in various disciplines including computer science, applied linguistics, communication, and similar fields.

For the good of the party, for the good of the nation: ingroup projection can motivate support for political violence

Support for political violence in the United States appears to be growing. We outline a model that positions ingroup projection—seeing ingroup values as the shared values of a larger inclusive societal group—as a key psychological process through which identification with political ingroups (Democrats/Republicans) and with national superordinate categories (Americans) influence support for political violence. We tested this model in two studies. Study 1 (N = 297) included original survey data collected during the 2016 US Presidential election, and analyses revealed that identification with Democrats or Republicans and identification with Americans both had positive indirect effects on support for political violence that were mediated by ingroup projection. Study 2 (N = 642) provided a preregistered replication of these results using original data collected during the 2022 US Midterm Senate elections. These results provide insight into the psychological processes that underlie support for political violence in the United States and elucidate a generalizable model for understanding destructive intergroup behaviors in a variety of real-world intergroup contexts.

Pandemic Persona and Digital Culture: The Role of Celebrity Politicians on Social Networks

The paper discusses a specific intersection of the politics, celebrity, and digital culture. In the last few decades, more and more people from the entertainment realm entered the world of institutional politics trying to leverage their popularity. Thanks to the media, they manage to transfer their celebrity capital, namely accumulated media visibility and recognisability (Driesens 2013) into the political sphere. In the beginning, they improve their visibility with the help of mass media that place their personas and private lives in the focus of public attention. However, with the digitalization of the media, the popular-political landscape has changed (Marshall 2020), so today they have dispositional new bases for practising personalized politics, i.e. imposing their personality instead of political party programmes. In this paper, attention is directed to former American president Donald Trump, president of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and Miroslav Škoro, who was a candidate in the presidential, parliamentary, and local elections in Croatia. Although there were obvious differences between these three celebrities mentioned before entering the political arena, their later use of social networks vividly shows how they built their political/pandemic persona in the evolving mediatization of politics.

American Presidential Elections 2024: The Core Point of Future Geopolitical Changes

Purpose: This research is focused on the ongoing Russia – Ukraine military conflict, which has already caused some significant changes in foreign policy priorities of major players of international political system. Objective: The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of U.S. 2024 elections to the Russia – Ukraine military conflict outcomes with the aim of analyzing different foreign policy philosophies the two potential candidates have, that can have an effect not only on current Russo-Ukrainian conflict but on the whole global geopolitical situation in the current world. Theoretical Framework: realism as an international relations theory with the system level analysis is used to explain current global geopolitical issues. Method: The issue of methodology is decided according to the necessities of tasks of this article and is mostly based on data analyses, comparison of similarities or differences and case study. Results and Discussion: the current work claims that the major war on the European continent disrupts the core security arrangements which has a shattering effects of unipolar liberal order and how much will this order be changed, is mainly depended on the dedication to it by the U.S.A, European union countries and their liberal democratic allies around the globe. Research Implications: the research findings contribute in raising awareness of the current Ukraine conflict and accumulate the type of knowledge that enriches the political science with theoretical and practical value.

Cyber democracy in the digital age: Characterizing hate networks in the 2022 US midterm elections

Social media has become integral to societal discourse and play a role in shaping public engagement, particularly in democratic electoral processes. This paper addresses the pressing issue of hate speech on social media during the 2022 US midterm elections. Unlike previous research, which often relies on limited datasets and classic methodologies, we leverage Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques to analyze Twitter data through advanced models of entity recognition, sentiment analysis, and community extraction, having persistence in Knowledge Graphs for consuming the intelligence efficiently. Results indicate that in the US midterm elections 2022, Arizona was the state that provided more content (507,551 tweets) related to a Chief Electoral Official, with 31.58% of them identified in the most aggressive cluster due to its mean attribute values of “attack on commenter” (0.7), “inflammatory” (∼0.3), “attack on author” (∼0.2), and “toxicity” (∼0.2). The name entity recognition model also identified an association between those aggressive tweets and the previous 2020 US Presidential campaign, characterized by attacks on election officials based on conspiracy theories campaigns. Knowledge graphs contributed to understanding the concentration of attacks and connectivity between topics commonly mentioned in hate speech content. Thus, our results offer detailed insights into the actors and dynamics of online harassment in electoral contexts, illuminating the challenges posed by harassment and proposing preventive mechanisms applicable to diverse electoral processes worldwide.