ABSTRACT Across the globe, refugees and asylum seekers have demonstrated against the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), demanding increased protection and assistance. Drawing on original ethnographic research, this article uses the analytical frames of contentious politics and legal consciousness to explore protest actions targeting UNHCR by Sudanese protection seekers in Beirut, Lebanon. It asks: Why and how do protesters choose to adopt human rights language in their claim-making? In other words, how do human rights motivate protest? And how does protest frame human rights? The article examines how Sudanese protesters framed their cause in the liberal internationalist discourse of human rights, often referring to terms and concepts derived straight from the vocabulary of international human rights and the international refugee protection regime. Specifically, the protesters invoked UNHCR’s obligations and responsibilities towards them and communicated their demands through the English language. The article contributes to our understanding not only of refugee rights claiming in Beirut specifically but also of how subaltern groups more generally are able to mobilise outside of traditional political structures. By exploring the circumstances under which protection seekers deploy the law to protect their interests, it also makes a distinct contribution to legal consciousness studies.
Read full abstract