Unintentional Discrepancies Research Articles

La conciliation médicamenteuse est-elle réalisable et pertinente en Psychiatrie ? : Retour d’expérience sur la mise en place de la conciliation à l’admission

The health care pathway of patients suffering from mental disorders is complex and includes a risk of interruption of treatment. We implemented medication reconciliation at patients' admission to mental health care service in February 2017. The aim of this study was to achieve a feedback experience answering our questions about the feasibility and relevance of this process. A prospective analysis of medication reconciliations over the first 7 months of implementation was carried out according to 3 activity indicators and 6 performance indicators. A total of 39 patients were reconciled and 56.4% of them were in enforced hospitalization unit. All patients were interviewed by the pharmacist. Collected information during this interview was concordant with at least one of the other sources in 70.4% of the cases. Thirteen patients were not reconciled within 72h after their admission because of their psychiatric pathology. The average number of unintentional medication discrepancy (UMD) detected was 0.97 per reconciled patient. The rate of major gravity UMD was 23.7%. The number of UMDs per patient was significantly higher in enforced hospitalization unit (P<0.05). UMDs were essentially related to somatic drugs (81.6%). Nearly 95% of the detected UMDs resulted in a modification of prescription. These results show that medication reconciliation at patients' admission is feasible and relevant in psychiatry. To limit constraints related to psychiatric pathology, we propose to perform medication reconciliation of patients more than 72 hours after patient admission provided that their clinical condition allows it.

Implementation and Impact of Pharmacist-Initiated Home Medication Ordering in an Emergency Department Observation Unit

Purpose: To design and evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of a medication reconciliation workflow incorporating pharmacist home medication ordering. Methods: Designed and implemented an admission medication reconciliation workflow that expanded the pharmacists’ role to include an initial ordering of home medications. Performed a prospective, pre–post cohort analysis comparing preimplementation accuracy and efficiency data from inpatient medicine and cardiology patients to postimplementation accuracy and efficiency data from our emergency department observation unit. Accuracy for the preimplementation group was defined by the number of unintentional discrepancies identified by pharmacists between the prescriber admission orders and the reconciled home medication lists. Accuracy for the postimplementation group was defined by the prescriber acceptance of pharmacist-ordered home medications. Efficiency was measured by pharmacist time to complete the admission medication reconciliation process. Results: Prescribers accepted 98% of home medication orders placed by pharmacists, which correlated with a significant decrease in the occurrence of home medication orders containing a medication-related problem or discrepancy (46.4% vs 1.3%, P < .0001). The mean pharmacist time spent completing medication reconciliation per admission decreased from 64 to 23 minutes (P < .0001). Conclusion: Implementation of an admission process that incorporates pharmacist ordering of home medications increased prescribing accuracy and efficiency.

Design of MARQUIS2: study protocol for a mentored implementation study of an evidence-based toolkit to improve patient safety through medication reconciliation

BackgroundThe first Multi-center Medication Reconciliation Quality Improvement Study (MARQUIS1) demonstrated that implementation of a medication reconciliation best practices toolkit decreased total unintentional medication discrepancies in five hospitals. We sought to implement the MARQUIS toolkit in more diverse hospitals, incorporating lessons learned from MARQUIS1.MethodsMARQUIS2 is a pragmatic, mentored implementation QI study which collected clinical and implementation outcomes. Sites implemented a revised toolkit, which included interventions from these domains: 1) best possible medication history (BPMH)-taking; 2) discharge medication reconciliation and patient/caregiver counseling; 3) identifying and defining clinician roles and responsibilities; 4) risk stratification; 5) health information technology improvements; 6) improved access to medication sources; 7) identification and correction of real-time discrepancies; and, 8) stakeholder engagement. Eight hospitalists mentored the sites via one site visit and monthly phone calls over the 18-month intervention period. Each site’s local QI team assessed opportunities to improve, implemented at least one of the 17 toolkit components, and accessed a variety of resources (e.g. implementation manual, webinars, and workshops). Outcomes to be assessed will include unintentional medication discrepancies per patient.DiscussionA mentored multi-center medication reconciliation QI initiative using a best practices toolkit was successfully implemented across 18 medical centers. The 18 participating sites varied in size, teaching status, location, and electronic health record (EHR) platform.We introduce barriers to implementation and lessons learned from MARQUIS1, such as the importance of utilizing dedicated, trained medication history takers, simple EHR solutions, clarifying roles and responsibilities, and the input of patients and families when improving medication reconciliation.

Implementing a sustainable medication reconciliation process in Australian hospitals: The World Health Organization High 5s project.

Medication reconciliation (medrec) is a mandated patient safety strategy by national, including Australian, accreditation bodies. Yet there are no validated performance measures. To determine the feasibility of implementing the World Health Organization (WHO) Medrec Standard Operating Protocol (SOP) in a range of Australian acute care facilities to achieve measurable and sustainable reductions in medication discrepancies occurring at admission. A multicentre, prospective national study was conducted in ten academic, urban and regional hospitals to implement the SOP using WHO High 5s project and quality improvement methodology. Sites collected data on the rate of medrec performed within 24 h of admission in a random selection of 50 patients aged ≥65 years admitted via the emergency department, monthly for four years. Medrec quality was reviewed in a subset of 30 patients using three performance measures. Barriers, enablers and benefits of SOP implementation were collected using qualitative surveys. Ten health services reviewed 42,003 patient records. Of these, 20,162 (49.5%) had medicines reconciled within 24 h of admission. Four services increased, two decreased, and in four, medrec completion rates remained static. Mean number of unintentional and undocumented intentional medication discrepancies per patient decreased: 0.21 to 0.16 (p = 0.001) and 0.34 to 0.08 (p = 0.003), respectively. Unintentional discrepancies decreased from 15.2% to 11.1% (p = 0.001). Barriers to full implementation included: medrec not seen as a priority, limited resources and lack of electronic systems integration. Enablers included: use of medrec measures for feedback, educational resources, and 7-day week clinical pharmacy services. Benefits included improvements in medication safety culture and multidisciplinary teamwork. The WHO SOP was feasible, although challenging, to implement in a range of acute health services, and produced measureable and sustainable improvements in medicines information accuracy on admission. Sustaining the quantum of quality and timely medrec requires investment in pharmacist resources and electronic systems integration.

Medication reconciliation: Predictors of risk of unintentional medication discrepancies in the cardiology department

Medication reconciliation is a powerful formal process to decrease medication errors, but it has proved to be complex and time consuming. To describe the frequency and types of medication discrepancies (between previous treatment and medication order at admission), and to identify predictors of unintentional medication discrepancies (UMDs). This interventional study was carried out in the cardiology department of a French teaching hospital. Medication reconciliation was conducted at admission to the cardiology department over 1 month in 2016 by trained pharmacists for: (1) determination of best possible medication history using multiple sources; (2) comparison with the patient's admission medication order and identification of discrepancies; and (3) classification of discrepancies (intentional/unintentional) with the physician. Associations between UMDs and various factors were examined. Overall, 100 patients were included (mean age 67.6±16.7 years; 56 men). The reconciliation process identified 544 drug discrepancies, 77 of which were UMDs; these occurred in 42 patients. The most common UMD type was omission (70.1%). Inability to speak French (P=0.007), low educational level (P=0.004), admission to a non-intensive care unit (P=0.019), two or more co-morbidities (P=0.001) and eight or more drugs on the admission order (P=0.004) were significantly associated with UMDs. Educational level remained significantly and independently associated with UMDs in a multivariable analysis after adjustment for factors that were statistically significant in the univariate analysis. This study highlights the high risk of medication discrepancies and the factors associated with UMDs. Our results allowed us to identify patients who should receive priority medication reconciliation in a cardiology department.

The prevalence and clinical seriousness of medication discrepancies identified upon hospital admission of pediatric patients

BackgroundMedication discrepancies are seen frequently in hospital setting upon admission or discharge. Medication Reconciliation service is a practice designed to ensure that patients’ medications are ordered in a correct manner upon hospital admission, thus reducing the risk of having medication discrepancies. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of medication discrepancies and their clinical seriousness in pediatric patients at the time of hospital admission.MethodsA prevalence cross-sectional study was conducted at the pediatric departement at the Jordan University hospital between March–May 2018. During the study period, 100 pediatric patients were enrolled using a convenience sampling method. Patients’ medical records were reviewed by two clinical pharmacist-reserachers to obtain patients' demographic, medical, and admission medication information. All parents were interviewed to obtain information regarding their children’s Best Possible Medication History (BPMH). Following data collection, differences between patient’s current admission medications and the BPMH were identified as medication discrepancies, and then they were classified into either undocumented intentional or unintentional discrepancies.ResultsAmong the 100 medication records reviewed, 13.0% (13 out of 100) contained at least one unintentional discrepancy, with the majority (n = 11, 84.6%) being classified to be associated with mild potential harm to patients. Of those discrepancies, 8 were omission of medications (61.5%) and 5 were addition of unnecessary medication (38.5%). On the other hand, 35.0% (35 out of 100) of medication records contained at least one intentional undocumented discrepancy.ConclusionsThis study revealed that unintentional medication discrepancies exist at the time of hospital admission for pediatric patients but with low proportion. The low proportion of medication discrepancies might be explained by the recent implementation of medication reconciliation service at the studied hospital. Also, intentional undocumented discrepancies were common, which may carry a potential harm to such vulnerable population at discharge. These data may inform the need for a strict policies to regulate medication documentation, thus decreasing the possibilities of medication errors.

Prevention of medication errors at hospital admission: a single-centre experience in elderly admitted to internal medicine.

Background Transition of care on admission to the hospital and between clinical areas are risk points for medication errors. All type of medication errors can be reduced by improving communication at each transition point of care. Objectives This study examines the impact of pharmacist obtained best possible medication histories on medication errors at admission due to unintentional medication discrepancies in older patients. Setting This was a prospective, single-center study conducted in an Internal Medicine Department of a tertiary care teaching hospitalin Saudi Arabia. Methods Patients ≥ 65years with an existing drug therapy on admission were eligible. The best possible medication historytaken by the pharmacist from different sources of medication information was compared to theadmission medication order to identify and correct unintentional discrepancies. The discrepancies were classified according to the type of errors. An independent multidisciplinary team adjudicated the potential for harm of each type of medication error. Main outcome measure Number and proportion of unintentional medication discrepancies upon admission and associated medication errors. Secondary outcomes included clinical significance anddrug classes involved in the discrepancies and risk factors for the occurrence of these discrepancies. Results A total of 375 evaluable patients were identified. Among 375 medication histories, 609 discrepancies were detected of which 226 were recorded as unintentional. 151 patients (42.4%) had ≥ 1 unintended discrepancy. Drug omission (37%) was the most frequent type of error. Nervous system (24.5%), and cardiovascular system (21.2%) were the most common drug classes involved in medication errors. Three-fifths of the UMD had the potential to cause temporary harm with initial or prolonged hospitalization. The number of medications prescribed upon admission (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.09-1.54, p < 0.034), number of sources consulted for the best possible medication history(OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.38-1.76, p < 0.01) and the completion of medication review process within 24h (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.86-0.94, p < 0.03) of the admission were the 3 most significant predictors of the discrepancies. Conclusions In elderly patients, medication histories are often recorded inaccurately by physicians at the time of hospital admission, this creates the potential for medication errors starting at admission. In older adults, best possible medication historiesare also useful in detecting drug related pathology or drug-drug interactions.

Impact of pharmacist's directed medication reconciliation on reducing medication discrepancies during transition of care in hospital setting

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the effect of pharmacist's directed services (reconciliation plus counselling) on reducing medication discrepancies and improving patient's outcomes at discharge from hospital. Methods During the 3-month study period, 200 patients were randomly selected from internal medicine department from Jordan University Hospital (JUH) and allocated into two groups (intervention and control groups). The number and types of medication discrepancies were identified at admission. Then, pharmacist implemented medication reconciliation and medication counselling services to the intervention group patients. At discharge, the number of unintentional discrepancies was evaluated for both groups. Patients were assessed at 1 month following their discharge for any subsequent hospital readmissions, emergency department visits or side effects of medication therapy. Key findings The total number of identified unintentional discrepancies was 84 for the intervention group compared with 60 discrepancies for the control group. Omission and addition represented the most common types of discrepancies for both groups. Of the 84 recommendations submitted by pharmacists, clinicians accepted 78 cases (92.8%), and implemented only 46 recommendations (54.7%). At discharge, a significant reduction in the number of unintentional discrepancies was achieved for the intervention group, P-value (0.014), while no significant change was found for the control group, P-value = 0.508. One month postdischarge, a significantly higher number of patients in the control group reported experiencing side effects compared with the intervention group, P-value = 0.020. Conclusion The presence of clinical pharmacists in hospital wards had a promising effect on decreasing the number of medication errors and improving health outcomes.

Conciliation médicamenteuse d’entrée en service de médecine interne : retour d’expérience après un an de pratique

Since April 2015, medication reconciliation is performed in our Department. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of this activity on patients’ care after one year of practice. MethodsAll patients who received medication reconciliation between April–October 2015 and June–December 2016 were included in this retrospective study. Undocumented unintentional discrepancies (DNIND) which result from the comparison between the patient's usual treatments and the medication prescribed at admission were collected. Then, a multidisciplinary discussion was initiated to correct them. The gravity of each DNIND was determined a posteriori. ResultsA statistical comparison between the two studies (2015 vs. 2016) showed the following significant results: decrease in DNIND (0.9 vs. 0.43), in percentage of patients with at least one DNIND (43% vs 31% P <5.10−6), in reconciliation time (43min vs. 23min) and no significant difference in the distribution of DNIND typology. The main therapeutic classes are: metabolism–diabetes–nutrition (21%), cardiology (18%), pneumology (17%) and neurology-psychiatry (15%). Drugs mainly concerned with DNIND are inhaled anti-asthmatics (13% of the medicines with DNIND), vitamins (8% of DNIND) and the levetiracetam antiepileptic drug (5% of DNIND). ConclusionThe implementation of the reconciliation medication allowed a significant reduction of the DNIND that permits to improve the patient healthcare pathway.

Medication Reconciliation: A Necessary Process for Patient Safety

Medication Reconciliation: A Necessary Process for Patient Safety

Improving the Safety and Quality of Systemic Treatment Regimens in Computerized Prescriber Order Entry Systems.

Systemic treatment (ST) computerized prescriber order entry (CPOE) and preprinted orders (PPO) are proven to reduce errors. There is no known guidance in oncology to facilitate high-quality, accurate regimen development and review; hence, this was identified as a system-wide gap. This provincial initiative aimed to improve the quality of oncology regimens through a comprehensive review of systemic treatment (ST) regimens and the development of standards. A system-wide analysis of all active regimens (both CPOE and PPO) to ensure they were built as intended was conducted in 2015. Thirty-five hospitals (on behalf of 75 treatment facilities) were asked to report any unintentional discrepancies and details of the maintenance review process. Discrepancies were compiled, categorized, and analyzed for potential to cause harm. In addition, a multidisciplinary expert working group was formed to create best practice recommendations. The review yielded a 94% response rate and took a total of 18 months to complete (70% completed within 9 months). The average number of regimens reviewed was 336 (range, 15 to 700; n = 9). Unintentional discrepancies were reported by nine hospitals (27%). A total of 369 discrepancies were reported (average, 55 per hospital), and 28 were deemed to have a moderate potential for harm. Only two hospitals (6%) had an established maintenance process; now, all have standard processes for review. Consensus-based recommendations for ST-CPOE and PPO regimen development and maintenance were developed. The review identified unintentional discrepancies and, because of the potential for patient harm, corrective action has been taken. Identified discrepancies have been amended, and standard regimen development and maintenance review processes are now implemented system-wide to improve the quality and safety of systemic treatment delivery.

Measures of Drug Prescribing at Care Transitions in an Internal Medicine Unit.

Care transitions represent a common source of drug errors and confusions. The purpose of our prospective observational study was to assess the prevalence of medication discrepancies at care transitions, along with potentially inappropriate medications and potential drug-drug interactions, in an internal medicine unit of an Italian hospital. Adverse drug reactions that occurred in the 30-day period after the discharge from the hospital were included. A related-samples McNemar test was performed for evaluating the effects of hospitalization on the above-mentioned measures of drug prescribing. Medication discrepancies were frequent both on admission (93.4% [95%CI 0.8749, 0.9713]) and at discharge (78.7% [95%CI 0.7035, 0.8558]), with a significant difference between transition times (-14.7% [95%CI -21.82%, -7.69%]; P<.001)]. A high potentially inappropriate medication use prevalence was revealed without differences between care transitions. Potential drug-drug interactions were more frequent at admission to the hospital, with a significant difference of 8.2% in the distribution of patients with potential drug-drug interactions between care transitions. None of the adverse drug reactions recorded on follow-up was related to unintentional discrepancies, and the prevalence rate of patients with potentially inappropriate medication-related adverse drug reactions ranged between 4.9% and 6.9%, and the prevalence rate of patients with drug-drug interaction-related adverse drug reactions was 4.1% of patients. This study is important to raise awareness of the potential dangers medication discrepancies, potentially inappropriate medications, and potential drug-drug interactions could have on older adults. Clinicians and clinical pharmacologists must collaborate to improve patient care and minimize drug-related clinical outcomes.

Predictive factors for clinically significant pharmacist interventions at hospital admission.

Pharmaceutical care activities at hospital admission have a significant impact on patient safety. The objective of this study was to identify predictive factors for clinically significant pharmacist interventions (PIs) performed during medication reconciliation and medication review at patient hospital admission.A 4-week prospective study was conducted in 4 medicine wards. At hospital admission, medication reconciliation and medication review were conducted and PIs were performed by the pharmaceutical team. The clinical impact of PIs was determined using the clinical economic and organizational (CLEO) tool. Clinical characteristics, laboratory results, and medication data for each patient were collected and analyzed as potential predictive factors of clinically significant PIs. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression were subsequently used to identify independent predictive factors for clinically relevant PIs.Among 265 patients admitted, 150 patients were included. Among 170 PIs performed at hospital admission, 71 were related to unintentional discrepancies (41.8%) during medication reconciliation, and 99 were related to drug-related problems (DRPs) (58.8%) during medication review. Overall, 115 PIs (67.7%) were considered to have a clinical impact. By multivariate analysis, number of medications ≥5 (P = .01) based on the best possible medication history, and Charlson comorbidity index score ≥2 (P < .01) were found to be independent predictive factors of clinically significant PIs at hospital admission.Identifying predictive factors of clinically significant PIs is valuable to optimize clinical pharmacist practices at hospital admission during both medication reconciliation and medication review. These 2 steps of the pharmaceutical care process improve medication safety at hospital admission.

Impact du pharmacien clinicien sur la iatrogénie médicamenteuse chez le patient greffé rénal

IntroductionDrug related problems (DRP) can lead to severe consequences in kidney recipients. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of the clinical pharmacist interventions on the incidence of DRP. MethodThe number of DRP were evaluated according to 3periods: Without intervention, with medication reconciliation at admission, and with medication reconciliation at admission associated with an interview with the clinical pharmacist at discharge. ResultsPatients concerned were mainly men, 55years old (median age), stage3 of CKD, transplanted for less than 3months or more than 1year, with cardiovascular risk factors and receiving an average of 9drugs/day. Among the DRP, 20% were avoidable and severe in most cases. In period1, 27.7% patients had at least 1DRP, in period2, 21.3% patients had at least 1DRP, and in period3, 17.4% of patients had at least 1DRP (P=0.03). One hundred and ten patients had medication reconciliation at admission with a mean of 0.6unintentional discrepancies per patient (omission in 81% of cases). The main drugs involved concerned the digestive-metabolic (24.5%), cardiovascular (23%), and nervous (23%) system. Sixty-eight interviews at discharge were realized and revealed self-medication habits. ConclusionOur study shows that medication reconciliation at admission associated with an interview with the clinical pharmacist at discharge can help to reduce DRP in kidney recipients. Further studies are needed to confirm our results.

Risk factors for medication errors at admission in preoperatively screened patients.

Preoperative screening (POS) may help to reduce medication errors at admission (MEA). However, due to the time window between POS and hospital admission, unintentional medication discrepancies may still occur and thus a second medication reconciliation at hospital admission can be necessary. Insight into potential risk factors associated with these discrepancies would be helpful to focus the second medication reconciliation on high-risk patients. To determine the proportion of POS patients with MEA and to identify risk factors for MEA. This single-centre observational cross-sectional study included elective surgical patients between October 26 and December 18, 2015. Main exclusion criteria were age younger than 18years and daycare admissions. Medication reconciliation took place at the POS and was repeated within 30hours of admission. Unintended discrepancies between the first and second medication reconciliation were defined as MEA. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with one or more MEA. The association of this outcome with potential risk factors was analysed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Of the 183 included patients, 60 (32.8%) patients had at least one MEA. In a multivariate model, the number of medications at POS (adjusted odds ratio 1.16 [95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.30]) and respiratory disease (4.25 [1.52-11.83]) were significantly associated with MEA. In one-third of preoperatively screened patients, an MEA was found. The number of medications and respiratory comorbidities are risk factors for MEA in preoperatively screened patients.

Medication errors at hospital admission and discharge in Type 1 and 2 diabetes

To assess the prevalence and characteristics of medication errors at hospital admission and discharge in people with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, and identify potential risk factors for these errors. This prospective observational study included all people with Type 1 (n=163) and Type 2 diabetes (n=508) admitted to the Diabetology-Department of the University Hospital of Montpellier, France, between 2013 and 2015. Pharmacists conducted medication reconciliation within 24h of admission and at hospital discharge. Medication history collected from different sources (patient/family interviews, prescriptions/medical records, contact with community pharmacies/general practitioners/nurses) was compared with admission and discharge prescriptions to detect unintentional discrepancies in medication indicating involuntary medication changes. Medication errors were defined as unintentional medication discrepancies corrected by physicians. Risk factors for medication errors and serious errors (i.e. errors that may cause harm) were assessed using logistic regression. A total of 322 medication errors were identified and were mainly omissions. Prevalence of medication errors in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes was 21.5% and 22.2% respectively at admission, and 9.0% and 12.2% at discharge. After adjusting for age and number of treatments, people with Type 1 diabetes had nearly a twofold higher odds of having medication errors (odds ratio (OR) 1.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-2.94) and serious errors (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.02-4.76) at admission compared with those with Type 2 diabetes. Medication reconciliation identified medication errors in one third of individuals. Clinical pharmacists should focus on poly-medicated individuals, but also on other high-risk people, for example, those with Type 1 diabetes.

The role of clinical pharmacists in the optimisation of medication prescription and reconciliation on admission in an emergency department

ObjectivesTo describe a clinical pharmacist’s (CP) activity in an emergency department (ED) regarding medication reconciliation and optimisation of pharmacotherapy of patients at hospital admission.MethodsA 1-year prospective observational study was conducted...

Impact of a medication reconciliation program on cardiac surgery patients.

Background Cardiac surgery patients are at high risk of medication errors. Resumption of home medications reduces the significance and number of medication errors. This could be achieved by implementing a medication reconciliation program. Patients and Methods Patients were eligible for inclusion in this prospective study if they were admitted, transferred, and/or discharged under cardiac surgery team care from September 2015 to March 2016. The primary outcome was the number and proportion of unintentional medication discrepancies. Secondary outcomes included the number of interventions to resolve discrepancies and their clinical significance, and the medication regimen complexity index and its correlation with discrepancies. Results There were 374 patients included and 1000 encounters tracked. Four-hundred and seventy (47%) of the included encounters were for adult patients. Of the 260 medication discrepancies detected, 181 (69.61%) were detected during admission. Discrepancies among adults were 0.913, 0.307, and 0.176 on admission, transfer, and discharge, respectively. Two-hundred (76.92%) of the interventions recommended by the pharmacy residents were accepted by the medical team, and the remaining were accepted with modifications, with no rejections. One-hundred and sixty-six (83%) of the accepted interventions were of high clinical significance. There was a significant correlation between the number of medication discrepancies and medication regimen complexity index on admission ( p < 0.0001, r = 0.34), transfer, and discharge. Conclusion Implementation of a medication reconciliation program in cardiac surgery units and its step-down units can be a powerful mean of identifying medication errors in post-cardiac surgery patients at admission and throughout the transition of care.

Identification of medication discrepancies during hospital admission in Jordan: Prevalence and risk factors

ObjectivesMedication errors are considered among the most common causes of morbidity and mortality in hospital setting. Among these errors are discrepancies identified during transfer of patients from one care unit to another, from one physician care to another, or upon patient discharge. Thus, the aims of this study were to identify the prevalence and types of medication discrepancies at the time of hospital admission to a tertiary care teaching hospital in Jordan and to identify risk factors affecting the occurrence of these discrepancies. MethodsA three months prospective observational study was conducted at the department of internal medicine at Jordan university hospital. During the study period, 200 patients were selected using convenience sampling, and a pre-prepared data collection form was used for data collection. Later, a comparison between the pre-admission and admission medication was conducted to identify any possible discrepancies, and all of these discrepancies were discussed with the responsible resident to classify them into intentional (documentation errors) or unintentional. Linear regression analysis was performed to assess risk factors associated with the occurrence of unintentional discrepancies. ResultsA total of 412 medication discrepancies were identified at the time of hospital admission. Among them, 144 (35%) were identified as unintentional while the remaining 268 (65%) were identified as intentional discrepancies. Ninety-four patients (47%) were found to have at least one unintentional discrepancy and 92 patients (46%) had at least one documentation error. Among the unintentional discrepancies, 97 (67%) were found to be associated with a potential harm/deterioration to the patients. Increasing patients’ age (beta= 0.195, p-value= .013) and being treated by female residents (beta= 0.139, p-value= .045) were significantly associated with higher number of discrepancies. ConclusionThe prevalence of unintentional discrepancies at the time of hospital admission was alarmingly high. Majority of these discrepancies were associated with a potential harm to the patients. These findings support the necessity for implementing the medication reconciliation service in the country, engaging healthcare providers in the process of identification and resolution of medication discrepancies.

Predictors for unintentional medication reconciliation discrepancies in preadmission medication: a systematic review.

Discrepancies in preadmission medication (PAM) are common and potentially harmful. Medication reconciliation is able to reduce the discrepancy rate, yet implementation is challenging. In order for reconciliation efforts to be more cost-effective, patients at high risk for reconciliation errors should be identified. The purpose of this systematic review is to identify predictors for unintentional discrepancies in PAM. Medline and Embase were searched systematically until June 2017. Only studies concerning adult subjects were retained. Quantitative studies were included if predictors for unintentional discrepancies in the PAM had been determined on hospital admission. Variables were divided into patient-, medication-, and setting-related predictors based on a thematic analysis. Studies on identification of predictors for discrepancies and potentially harmful discrepancies were handled separately. Thirty-five studies were eligible, of which 5 studies focused on potentially harmful discrepancies. The following 16 significant variables were identified using multivariable prediction models: number of preadmission drugs, patient's age, availability of a drug list, patients' understanding of medication, usage of different outpatient pharmacies, number of high-risk drugs, discipline for which the patient is admitted, admitting physician's experience, number and type of consulted sources, patient's gender, type of care before admission, number of outpatient visits during the past year, class of medication, number of reimbursements, use of an electronic prescription system, and type of admission (elective vs emergency). The number of preadmission drugs was identified as a predictor in 20 studies. Potentially harmful discrepancies were ascertained in 5 studies with age found to have a predictive value in all 5 studies. Multiple suitable predictors for PAM-related discrepancies were identified of which higher age and polypharmacy were reported most frequently.