Previous articleNext article No AccessThe Case for Non-Graded, Homogeneous GroupingRichard C. AndersonRichard C. Anderson Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Elementary School Journal Volume 62, Number 4Jan., 1962 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/459959 Views: 5Total views on this site Citations: 5Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1962 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:William E. Walker The slow‐progress student in graded and Nongraded programs, Peabody Journal of Education 50, no.33 (Nov 2009): 191–210.https://doi.org/10.1080/01619567309537909William P. McLoughlin The effectiveness of the nongraded school, International Review of Education 18, no.11 (Dec 1972): 194–211.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01450284L. W. Shears Experimental Ventures in Australian Education: I.—The Ungraded School in Australia, Australian Journal of Education 10, no.33 (Oct 1966): 273–290.https://doi.org/10.1177/000494416601000306Kenneth D. Hopkins, O. A. Oldridge, Malcolm L. Williamson An Empirical Comparison of Pupil Achievement and Other Variables in Graded and Ungraded Classes, American Educational Research Journal 2, no.44 (Jun 2016): 207–215.https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312002004207Norman Schanin A REVIEW OF AMERICAN PEDAGOGIC LITERATURE RELEVANT TO JEWISH EDUCATION, Jewish Education 33, no.22 (Aug 2006): 97–113.https://doi.org/10.1080/0021642630330205