MLR, I02.2, 2007 555 context and toLessing's preoccupations at the time ofwriting. The detailed analysis of his postscript to Jerusalem's essays throwswelcome light on Jerusalem's philo sophical determinism and Lessing's own, less radical equivalent. More specifically, the author seeks to demonstrate thatLessing's reference to a 'second system' which might remove some possible objections to thatof Jerusalem isnot to metempsychosis, but to Spinoza's metaphysics. Though this contention may not convince everyone, itdoes put the onus on supporters of the traditional view to argue their case more convincingly. The long section on Die Erziehung desMenschengeschlechts rightly takes issuewith thosewho treat it (togetherwith Ernst und Falk and Nathan der Weise) as part of a trilogyembodying theolder Lessing's definitivewisdom. Instead, itplaces thework in thecontext of his response toReimarus's Fragmente and of theworks which helped to define this response, especially those of the English deist Thomas Morgan, the Christian apologist William Warburton, and the Scottish philosopher Adam Fergu son. Though welcome and appropriate, this initiative isunduly restrictive.Lessing did not simply efface fromhismemory all he had read inearlier years with a bearing on his theme (as theauthor tacitlyacknowledges by including Ferguson, whose Essay onCivil Society Lessing had studied over fiveyears earlier).Most ofLessing's alleged debts toFerguson could inany case equally well be toRousseau, towhom Ferguson's ideas on the transition fromprimitive societies to civilization are decisively indebted. Accounts ofmetempsychosis inTertullian and other Church Fathers, in Wieland's poem Die Natur der Dinge, and inmany other eighteenth-century writers might equally have played a part. On the two late fragments, the author casts new light on theworks by Campe and Bonnet towhich Lessing alludes, and demonstrates conclusively that the second fragment, influenced by Bonnet's physiological theoryof the soul's immortality,has little incommon with Lessing's speculations on terrestrial reincarnation in theother works discussed. The work as awhole iswell informed and accurate. It is,however,mistaken in ac cepting Karl Lessing's erroneous conclusion thatLessing's translation of theopening paragraph ofLeibniz's Nouveaux essais is a plan forawork of his own (p. 341 ). SIDNEY SUSSEX COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE H. B. NISBET Karl Philipp Moritz inBerlin I789-I793. Ed. by UTE TINTEMANN and CHRISTOF WINGERTSZAHN. (Berliner Klassik, 4) Berlin: Wehrhahn. 2005. 337 pp. E28. ISBN 978-3-932324-30-7. Literary-historical treatment sometimes resembles intensive care: the corpus (of the work) lies comatose butwired up to thevarious machines (oferudition) monitoring its vital signs. It is like thathere: a largely technical set of eighteen essays, derived from a conference inDecember 2002, mostly werkimmanent, really for thosewho want to get technical with theMoritz corpus, or ratherwith that part of it singled out for intensive treatment,mainly theworks on aesthetics, linguistics, and stylewritten be tweenMoritz's return toBerlin from Italy and his death. Published in a series called 'BerlinerKlassik. Eine Grol3stadtkultur um i800', thebook and its titlesuggest social history (see the 'Vorwort', p. i), but that really only comes out in the last fiveessays onMoritz's connections with Freemasonry (JiirgenJahnke), theGerman-Jewish En lightenment (Claudia Stockinger), mysticism (ChristofWingertszahn), Jewishcontri butors to the Magazinfiir Erfahrungsseelenkunde (Stefan Goldmann), and an extract from an unfinished play byMaler Muller satirizingMoritz's behaviour during his Italian sojourn (Eckhard Faul). The preceding essays deal with some very specific 556 Reviews specifics: the 'archaeology of perception' in the Italian travelogue (Irmgard Egger), a comparison between Moritz and Piranesi on the role of perspective (Renata Gam bino), theminimalism of the illustrations in theGotterlehre (Ulrike Miinter) as well as their reception in the early nineteenth century (Gertrud Platz-Horster), history painting as the key to interpretingUber die bildendeNachahmung des Schonen (Clau dia Sedlarz), Die neue Cecilia in itsaesthetic context (Alexander Kosenina), Moritz's ideas on the relationship between pictorial representation and its linguistic descrip tion (Tomishige Yoshio), his conception of allegory (Achim Geisenhansliuke), his reflectionson the aesthetic potential of everyday life(Iwan D'Aprile), his Italienische Sprachlehre (Ute Tintemann), and his Vorlesungen iiberdenStyl (Justus vonHartlieb). The emphasis on aesthetics and related issues validates Moritz as a significant literary figure in his own right.But that significance isnot substantiated here, per haps because, as a discipline develops, it breaks its subject's substance down into ever smaller elements, in...