Unexpected Positive Cultures Research Articles

Prevalence of unexpected intraoperative cultures (UPIC) in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

Prevalence of unexpected positive intraoperative cultures (UPIC) in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is reported to be 8.32% with largely varying findings in individual studies (5.92-62.07%) due to a heterogeneity in preoperative diagnostic work-up and diagnostic criteria for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). When diagnosed as unsuspected PJI, re-revision rate is reported to be as high as 18.45% compared to 2.94% in patients with UPIC classified as contamination (p = 0.0237). We performed a monocentric retrospective analysis of revision TKA surgery to determine prevalence of UPIC, risk of developing a subsequent PJI and re-revision rate after 24 months compared to those without UPIC. All presumed aseptic total knee revision procedures from 2008 until 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Single stage femorotibial revisions of TKA with at least 3 intraoperative cultures and a minimum follow-up of 24 months were included, whereas partial revisions or revisions from unicompartimental knee prosthesis to TKA were excluded. Demographic data were collected as well as initial reason for revision, preoperative aspiration results, micro-organism identified and postoperative antibiotics' administration. Primary outcome was survival rate after 24 months with differentiation based on UPIC interpretation: sterile, contamination, unsuspected PJI. Of 256 included cases, 75 (29.3%) were found to have at least 1 UPIC during revision surgery, 72% of whom a single UPIC was found. Thirty-four cases (13.28%) were interpreted as unsuspected PJI and therefore treated with antibiotics. In total, 13 of the 256 patients (5.08%) had to be re-revised during follow-up with 7 PJI (2.73%), none of them developing reinfection defined as PJI with the same microorganism. A statistically significant trend towards earlier failure in the unsuspected PJI group compared to the contaminant group was not observed. However, a higher incidence of re-revisions attributed to septic reasons was noted in the former group. Presence of UPIC in presumed aseptic revision TKA does not correlate with a lower survival rate, but a higher incidence of subsequent PJI was observed in cases interpreted as unsuspected PJI.

Unexpected positive cultures in aseptic revision hip and knee arthroplasty.

The outcomes of patients with unexpected positive cultures (UPCs) during revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remain unknown. The objectives of this study were to establish the prevalence and infection-free implant survival in UPCs during presumed aseptic single-stage revision THA and TKA at mid-term follow-up. This study included 297 patients undergoing presumed aseptic single-stage revision THA or TKA at a single treatment centre. All patients with at least three UPCs obtained during revision surgery were treated with minimum three months of oral antibiotics following revision surgery. The prevalence of UPCs and causative microorganisms, the recurrence of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs), and the infection-free implant survival were established at minimum five years' follow-up (5.1 to 12.3). Of the 297 patients undergoing aseptic revisions, 37 (12.5%) had at least three UPCs obtained during surgery. The UPC cohort included 23 males (62.2%) and 14 females (37.8%), with a mean age of 71.2 years (47 to 82). Comorbidities included smoking (56.8%), hypertension (48.6%), diabetes mellitus (27.0%), and chronic renal impairment (13.5%). The causative microorganisms included Staphylococcus epidermidis (49.6%), Bacillus species (18.9%), Micrococcus species (16.2%), and Cutibacterium acnes (16.2%). None of the study patients with UPCs developed further PJIs or required further surgical intervention during follow-up. The prevalence of UPCs during presumed aseptic revision THA and TKA was 12.5%. The most common causative microorganisms were of low virulence, and included S. epidermidis, Bacillus species, Micrococcus species, and C. acnes. Microorganism-specific antibiotic treatment for minimum three months' duration of UPCs in presumed aseptic revision arthroplasty was associated with excellent infection-free implant survival at mid-term follow-up.

Unexpected positive cultures in conversion hip and knee arthroplasty.

Total hip and knee arthroplasty in patients with previous history of periarticular surgery, such as osteosynthesis, can be surprisingly complex. This type of procedure is known as conversion arthroplasty (cTHA or cTKA) and has a higher risk of complications. The rates of unexpected positive cultures (UPC) and the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) compared to primary arthroplasty is unclear. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate rates of Unexpected Positive Cultures (UPC) in a series of conversion arthroplasty patients. The main questions to answer are: 1. Are the patients with conversion arthroplasties more susceptible to UPC than other causes of revision arthroplasties? 2. Are the conversion patients with UPC more susceptible to developing PJI? This was a retrospective review of patients submitted to cTHA and cTKA from January 2012 to September 2018. Patients with history of previous infection or with missing intraoperative cultures were excluded. The UPC was defined as a single positive culture obtained during a procedure previously considered aseptic and PJI was defined according to the 2018 ICM criteria. After excluding 141 cases, 205 patients were analyzed, 160 hips and 45 knees. Nine (4.4%) UPC were identified, five (3.1%) in the hip group and four (8,9%) in the knee group. Staphylococcal species were the most common isolated bacteria (n = 7, 77.7%). During the study period, four (1,9%) patients were diagnosed with PJI. Only one case had an UPC and a different germ was identified during revision arthroplasty workup. While UPC are more prevalent in conversion knee arthroplasties compared to conversion hip arthroplasties, the rates are similar to those observed in revision arthroplasty for other indications. Importantly, the presence of a UPC in conversion arthroplasty does not appear to elevate the risk of subsequent periprosthetic joint infection, provided a thorough PJI workup has been conducted preoperatively. Therefore, in such cases, UPCs may be safely disregarded.

Prognostic Implications of Unexpected Positive Intraoperative Cultures in Two-Stage Knee Arthroplasty Reimplantations: A Minimum Five-Year Retrospective Analysis

BackgroundThe clinical challenge of unexpected positive intraoperative cultures (UPICs) persists in 2-stage resection arthroplasty for managing periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) following total knee arthroplasty.(TKA). This study aimed to investigate the incidence of UPICs during the definitive reimplantation phase of 2-stage resection arthroplasty of the knee and to assess both the infection-free and revision-free survivorship of the implanted prosthesis. MethodsThis retrospective study included 450 2-stage resection arthroplasties of primary knee prostheses performed between January 2012 and April 2017. Patients were excluded if they: (1) underwent three or more staged resections, (2) had ambiguous clinical documentation or deviated from the 2-stage protocol, or (3) underwent revision arthroplasty prior to the PJI. Additionally, patients presumed aseptic before the second-stage reimplantation were excluded if they lacked joint aspiration or met the 2011 Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for PJI before implantation. ResultsAfter exclusions, 300 patients were analyzed. Among them, 14% had UPIC during the second-stage reimplantation. The follow-up time was 2,316 (range, 1,888 to 3,737) days and 2,531 (range, 1,947 to 3,349) days for UPIC and negative intraoperative culture (NIC) groups, respectively. Rerevision due to subsequent PJI occurred in 26.2% of UPIC patients and 15.1% of NIC patients. The 2-year infection-free survival rates for the NIC, one UPIC, and ≥ two UPIC cohorts were 99.5, 98.2, and 94.3%, respectively, while the 5-year survival rates were 92.1, 91.1, and 54.3%, respectively. The unfavorable survivorship was significantly different in multiple UPIC cases (P < 0.001). Multiple UPICs with pathogens consistent with the first-stage findings were strongly associated with the risk of reinfection (P < 0.001). ConclusionsAn UPIC was identified in 14% of second-stage reimplantations. Patients who had multiple UPICs demonstrated truncated survivorship and suboptimal outcomes relative to the NIC and single UPIC cohorts, especially with pathogen consistency to the first-stage surgery. Level of evidenceIII.

Prevalence, risk factors, microbiological results and clinical outcome in unexpected positive intraoperative cultures in unclear and presumed aseptic hip and knee revision arthroplasties – A ten-year retrospective analysis with a minimum follow up of 2 years

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, microbiological spectrum, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of unexpected-positive-intraoperative-cultures (UPIC) in presumed aseptic and unclear revision-total-hip-/knee-arthroplasties (rTHA and rTKA) compared to culture-negative (CN) revisions. MethodsThis study reviewed all International-consensus-meeting-2018 (ICM 2018) negative or inconclusive rTHA (n = 751) and rTKA (n = 679) performed at our institution from 2011 to 2020 with a minimum follow-up of two years. A Kaplan-Meier-analysis was performed to determine the septic and aseptic-free implant survival in cases with UPIC's and matched culture-negative cases. Patient demographics, risk factors, microbiological spectrum and clinical outcomes were evaluated. ResultsThere were significantly more UPIC cases in rTHA 196/751 (26.1 %) compared to rTKA 113/679 (16.6 %); (p < 0.001). UPICs in rTKA and rTHA have a lower septic and aseptic implant-free-survival compared to CN revisions. Patients with a history of nickel allergy have a higher risk of an UPIC in rTHA and rTKA (p < 0.001). Septic re-revisions after UPIC had a significantly (H: p = 0.004; K: p = 0.030) shorter time period to the primary/previous surgery (H: 84 (IQR:41–797); K: 115 (IQR:55–446)) compared to patients with aseptic re-revisions after UPIC (H:1248 (IQR:178-3534); K: 827 (IQR:361-1183)). ConclusionUPICs have a higher rate of septic and aseptic failure than CN outcomes. UPICs are twice as common in rTHA compared to rTKA. Preoperative PJI workup reduces the UPIC rate. Nickel allergy is a risk factor for UPIC. Early revisions with UPICs after primary THA or TKA have a higher risk of septic failure. The translational potential of this articleThis article provides new information on revision rates for UPIC and potential risk factors for UPIC and its treatment failure.

Unexpected positive cultures in revision total knee arthroplasty after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Unexpected positive cultures are defined as a single positive culture in intraoperative samples taken during revision surgery after prosthetic joint infection was preoperatively ruled out. This study aims to determine the prevalence of unexpected positive cultures (UPC) in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). As a secondary objective, this study aims to compare the re-intervention rate in this specific group, between UPC and non-UPC patients. The hypothesis is that the UPC prevalence in patients who undergo a revision TKA after UKA is not higher than in other TKA revision cases and this does not increase the risk of re-intervention. This is a retrospective study where all patients who underwent a UKA revision from January 2016 to February 2023 in a high-volume arthroplasty centre, were analyzed. Unexpected positive culture prevalence in this group of patients was obtained. During the included period, 270 UKA revision surgeries were performed. Eight cases had at least two positive cultures and were therefore excluded. The final analysis included 262 patients. Of these, 8 (3.05%) patients presented UPCs and the isolated microorganisms were low-virulence organisms. None of the UPC patients received any treatment. No statistical differences were found between UPC and non-UPC groups in the analyzed variables. The prevalence of unexpected positive cultures in patients following revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is lower than in patients who undergo a revision of total knee arthroplasty. In UKA patients a UPC does not seem to increase the risk of a re-intervention, so it can be safely ignored if ICM criteria are not met.

The role of BioFire Joint Infection Panel in diagnosing periprosthetic hip and knee joint infections in patients with unclear conventional microbiological results.

This study aimed to evaluate the BioFire Joint Infection (JI) Panel in cases of hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) where conventional microbiology is unclear, and to assess its role as a complementary intraoperative diagnostic tool. Five groups representing common microbiological scenarios in hip and knee revision arthroplasty were selected from our arthroplasty registry, prospectively maintained PJI databases, and biobank: 1) unexpected-negative cultures (UNCs), 2) unexpected-positive cultures (UPCs), 3) single-positive intraoperative cultures (SPCs), and 4) clearly septic and 5) aseptic cases. In total, 268 archived synovial fluid samples from 195 patients who underwent acute/chronic revision total hip or knee arthroplasty were included. Cases were classified according to the International Consensus Meeting 2018 criteria. JI panel evaluation of synovial fluid was performed, and the results were compared with cultures. The JI panel detected microorganisms in 7/48 (14.5%) and 15/67 (22.4%) cases related to UNCs and SPCs, respectively, but not in cases of UPCs. The correlation between JI panel detection and infection classification criteria for early/late acute and chronic PJI was 46.6%, 73%, and 40%, respectively. Overall, the JI panel identified 12.6% additional microorganisms and three new species. The JI panel pathogen identification showed a sensitivity and specificity of 41.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 33.7 to 49.5) and 91.1% (95% CI 84.7 to 94.9), respectively. In total, 19/195 (9.7%) could have been managed differently and more accurately upon JI panel evaluation. Despite its microbial limitation, JI panel demonstrated clinical usefulness by complementing the traditional methods based on multiple cultures, particularly in PJI with unclear microbiological results.

Prevalence and Impact of Unexpected Positive Intraoperative Cultures in Total Hip or Knee Revision Surgery

BackgroundOur aim was to evaluate the prevalence and impact of unexpected positive intraoperative cultures (UPICs) on the outcome of presumed aseptic total knee and hip revision surgery. MethodsData regarding patients who underwent elective total hip or knee revision surgery from January 2003 to July 2017 due to preoperatively presumed aseptic reasons was retrospectively reviewed. Partial revisions and patients who had follow-ups below 60 months were excluded from the study. In all surgeries, at least 3 intraoperative samples were taken for microbial culture. Failure was defined as the need for rerevision due to any cause at 5 years and/or the need for antibiotic suppressive therapy. Overall, 123 total hip and 431 total knee revisions were eligible for the study. All cases had at least a 5 years follow-up. ResultsThere were 420 cases (75.8%) that had all cultures negative, 108 (19.5%) had a single UPIC, and 26 (4.7%) had either ≥2 UPICs for the same microorganism or 1 UPIC for a virulent microorganism. This latter group was not associated with a significantly higher failure rate (2 of 26, 7.7%) compared to those in the aseptic group (54 of 528, 10.2%). Revisions performed within the first 24 months after primary implantation had a higher 5-years rerevision rate (19.3 versus 8.4%, P = .01), mainly attributable to aseptic causes. ConclusionsTotal hip and knee revisions with UPICs were not significantly associated with a higher rerevision risk at 5 years. Those revisions performed within the first 24 months after primary arthroplasty had a higher rate of any-cause failure.

Unexpected positive cultures of humeral head detected with dithiothreitol in primary shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundUnexpected positive cultures (UPCs) are frequently observed in primary shoulder arthroplasty and its clinical significance has not yet been well defined. The aim is to evaluate the UPCs in humeral head in primary shoulder replacement and to understand if UPCs increase in patients with risk factors for contamination (previous surgery or infiltrations). MethodsPatients undergoing total shoulder replacement were enrolled in this prospective observational study. To reduce the risk of humeral head contamination, all known procedures to reduce C. acnes burden of the skin were implemented. Patients were divided into 2 groups, namely patients who had undergone previous rotator cuff repair or infiltration and patients with no risk factors for contamination. All the humeral heads harvested were treated with Dithiothreitol, in a specific device (MicroDTTect), to increase the sensitivity of the cultures for bacterial identification. The cultures were analyzed for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria for up to 14 days. ResultsThe UPCs positivity rate of the 80 patients in the study was 19 % (15 patients). The positivity rates for UPCs in the group with and without risk factors were 30 % (12 patients) and 7.5% (3 patients), respectively. The rate of positive culture was higher in men (87%) than in women (13%).The observed positivity was due to Cutibacterium acnes and peptoniphilus asaccarolyticus, both slow-growing anaerobes. ConclusionsPatients with previous surgery or infiltrations had a 4-fold higher rate of positivity for UPCs compared with patients without previous risk factors. The higher percentage of positivity in patients with risk factors could be related to changes in the joint microenvironment after shoulder procedures. We do not know whether the presence of UPCs could be associated with the development of periprosthetic infections at longer follow-up.

Unexpected positive culture (UPC) in adults revision spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of incidence, risk factors, and management.

Without clear signs of infection, spinal implant failure is attributed to mechanical overloads and aseptic loosening. However, how low-grade infections contribute to seemingly aseptic implant failure is unclear. The systematic review examined unexpected positive cultures (UPCs) in revision spine surgery regarding prevalence, isolated pathogens, risk factors, and strategies to reduce infection among asymptomatic patients undergoing revision spine surgery. We followed the PRISMA guidelines and searched four main databases (PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science) comprehensively until January 2023 for articles reporting UPC after presumed aseptic adult revision spine surgery. The UPC rates were pooled, and risk factors were compared with the culture-negative control group and represented as odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD). Fifteen studies of 1057 individuals were included in two groups: culture-positive or UPCs (n = 317) and culture-negative or control (n = 740). The overall UPC prevalence was 33.2% (317/1057, range: 0 to 53%, 95% CI = 30.2%-36.4%), and Cutibacterium acnes (43.0%, 95% CI = 37.4%-48.8%), Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS), (39.5%, 95% CI = 33.2%-46.2%), and Staphylococcus species in general (49.5%, 95%CI = 43.7%-55.4%) were reported the most common isolated microbes. 16.1% of the UPCs were polymicrobial. Risk factors associated with UPC rates were female sex (OR = 2.62, 95%CI = 1.76-3.90, P < 0.001), screw loosening (OR = 4.43, 95%CI = 1.31-15.02, P = 0.02), number of operated levels (MD = 0.77, 95%CI = 0.33-1.22, P = 0.0007), and shorter time since index surgery (MD = - 8.57 months, 95%CI = - 14.76, -2.39, P = 0.02). One-third of patients undergoing spine revision surgery revealed UPC in this study. Each UPC pathogen interpretation and antibiotic use decision should be interpreted case by case. IV.

Unexpected Positive Cultures in Hip and Knee Periprosthetic Fractures

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of unexpected positive cultures noted at the time of revision surgery for periprosthetic fracture (PPF) after total hip or knee arthroplasty. Moreover, we evaluated whether this finding should be considered clinically significant and what type of treatment, if any, was required. MethodsThis was a single-center retrospective review of 270 patients undergoing surgery for PPFs from December 2010 to December 2021. Exclusion criteria included: open fractures; history of infection at fractured joint; non-operatively treated patients; and intraoperative fractures. The primary end point was the prevalence of unexpected positive cultures noted at the time of revision surgery. This was defined as one or more positive cultures in a PPF that the surgeon had preoperatively classified as aseptic according to the 2018 International Consensus Meeting. Data collection included patient demographics, medical histories, preoperative investigations, postoperative microbiology, and treatment. ResultsDuring the study period, 159 patients were admitted with PPFs of the hip and 61 with PPFs of the knee. The mean age was 70 years (range, 32 to 93 years). Unexpected positive cultures were diagnosed postoperatively in 15 patients (6.8%; 10 hips, 5 knees). The most prevalent organism was Staphylococcus epidermidis (35.0%). Of those 15 patients, 6 required a surgical revision for infection. None of the patient-related risk factors were found to be associated with an increased risk of unexpected positive cultures. The comparison between infected and noninfected patients showed a significant association between preoperative C-reactive protein >10 mg/mL (P = .04), loose implant (P = .07), and infection. ConclusionsThe prevalence of unexpected positive cultures was 6.8% in our study cohort. Although surgical treatment may be required, the majority of patients seem to require no treatment. Larger series are required to investigate the clinical importance of this rare finding. Level of EvidenceIII.

Unexpected positive cultures in patients with arthrofibrosis following total hip and total knee arthroplasty.

It has been suggested that low-grade infections could be the cause of arthrofibrosis. However, this hypothesis has not been conclusively proven. The aim of this study is to assess the incidence of unexpected positive cultures (UPC) in patients undergoing revision total joint arthroplasty for a diagnosis of arthrofibrosis. A retrospective single-centre review was performed. All patients who underwent an aseptic revision due to histologically confirmed arthrofibrosis (based on the synovial-like interface membrane (SLIM) criteria) were included. The incidence of UPC was then calculated. A total of 147 patients were included. Of these, 100 underwent a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedure and 46 a total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery. One patient had a periprosthetic joint infection and was therefore excluded. Of the 146 included patients, 6 had confirmed UPC (4.08%). The following bacteria were identified: Anaerococcus octavius, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterobacter cloacae, Staphylococcus hominis, Streptococcus pluranimalium, Staphylococcus pettenkoferi. Our results suggest that the incidence of UPC in patients with arthrofibrosis is low. It is lower than that of UPC in patients that undergo a revision for other causes. There is no proven relationship between histologically confirmed arthrofibrosis following total joint arthroplasty and prosthetic joint infection.

Utility of histopathological examination in aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary analysis.

The utility of a routine histopathological examination in aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) has not been well explored. We aim to describe the approach and present the results of histopathological examination, focusing on its clinical usefulness in the setting of aseptic revision THA. We retrospectively reviewed 285 performed aseptic revision THA with available histopathological reports between 2015 and 2017 at a single institution. We described histopathological requests by the surgical team. Preoperative diagnoses, intraoperative findings, as well as histopathology and culture results were analysed. 13 painful THAs (4.5%) had preoperatively unknown diagnoses. In 10 of them, potential causes of pain were intraoperatively identified. Histopathology confirmed these findings in 8 THAs. 19 THAs (6.7%) revealed unexpected positive cultures (UPC). Histopathology was negative for infection in 18 of them. Among 16 consultants, 3 surgeons requested histopathology in 47% of the cases (130/285), usually to exclude infection (101/285; 35%). Documentation for tissue sample location was lacking in 51% (145/285), and for question asked by the surgeon in 47% (135/285). Histopathology is deemed a useful confirmatory tool in the context of ruling out infection in UPCs, and in documenting intraoperative findings in painful THAs with unknown preoperative diagnoses. Importantly, the approach to requesting histopathology should be optimised. Further large-scale studies, including cost analyses, are warranted to explore the usefulness of histopathology in routine utility.

Unexpected Positive Cultures in Patients Who Have a History of Septic Revision in the Same Joint

BackgroundThe prevalence of unexpected positive cultures (UPC) in an aseptic revision surgery of the joint with a prior septic revision in the same joint remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of UPC in that specific group. As secondary outcomes, we explored risk factors for UPC. MethodsThis retrospective study includes patients who had an aseptic revision total hip/knee arthroplasty procedure with a prior septic revision in the same joint. Patients who had less than 3 microbiology samples, without joint aspiration or with aseptic revision surgery performed <3 weeks after a septic revision were excluded. The UPC was defined as a single positive culture in a revision that the surgeon had classified as aseptic according to the 2018 International Consensus Meeting. After excluding 47, a total of 92 patients were analyzed, who had a mean age of 70 years (range, 38 to 87). There were 66 (71.7%) hips and 26 (28.3%) knees. The mean time between revisions was 83 months (range, 31 to 212). ResultsWe identified 11 (12%) UPC and in 3 cases there was a concordance of the bacteria compared to the previous septic surgery. There were no differences for UPC between hips/knees (P = .282), diabetes (P = .701), immunosuppression (P = .252), previous 1-stage or 2-stages (P = .316), causes for the aseptic revision (P = .429) and time after the septic revision (P = .773). ConclusionThe prevalence of UPC in this specific group was similar to those reported in the literature for aseptic revisions. More studies are needed to better interpret the results.

Alpha-defensin as a diagnostic tool in revision total knee arthroplasties with unexpected positive intraoperative cultures and unexpected culture negative intraoperative cultures.

Unexpected-positive-intraoperative-cultures (UPIC) are common in presumed aseptic revision-total-knee-arthroplasties (rTKA). However, the clinical significance is not entirely clear. In contrast, in some presumably septic rTKA, identification of an underlying pathogen was not possible, so-called unexpected-negative-intraoperative-cultures (UNIC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential use of synovial alpha-defensin (AD) levels in these patients. Synovial AD levels from 143 rTKAs were evaluated retrospectively from our prospectively maintained institutional periprostetic joint infection (PJI) biobank and database. The 2018-International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria was used to define the study groups. Samples from UPICs with a minimum of one positive intraoperative culture (ICM 2- ≥ 6) (n = 20) and UNIC's (ICM ≥ 6) (n = 14) were compared to 34 septic culture-positive samples (ICM ≥ 6) and 75 aseptic culture-negative (ICM 0-1). Moreover, AD-lateral-flow-assay (ADLF) and an enzyme-linked-immunosorbent-assay (ELISA) in detecting the presence of AD in native and centrifuged synovial fluid specimens was performed. Concentration of AD determined by ELISA and ADLF methods, as well as microbiological, and histopathological results, serum and synovial parameters along with demographic factors were analysed. AD was positive in 31/34 (91.2%) samples from the septic culture-positive group and in 14/14 (100%) samples in the UNIC group. All UPIC samples showed a negative AD result. Positive AD samples were highly associated with culture positive and histopathological results (p < 0.001). No high-virulent microorganisms (0/20) were present in the UPIC group, compared to infected-group (19/34; 55.9%). High virulent microorganisms showed a positive AD result in 89.5% (17/19) of the cases. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus epidermis (MRSE) infections had significantly higher AD levels than with methicillin susceptible S. epidermdis (MSSE) (p = 0.003). ELISA and ADLF tests were positive with centrifuged (8/8) and native (8/8) synovial fluid. AD showed a solid diagnostic performance in infected and non-infected revisions, and it provided an additional value in the diagnosis of UPIC and UNIC associated to rTKAs. Pathogen virulence as well as antibiotic resistance pattern may have an effect on AD levels. Centrifugation of synovial fluid had no influence on ADLF results.

Canadian Spine Society

# Abstract 57. Radiographic reporting in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Is there a discrepancy comparing radiologists’ reports and surgeons’ assessments? {#article-title-2} Cobb angle measurement is the standard method for quantification of scoliosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS),

An evidence-based approach to managing unexpected positive cultures in shoulder arthroplasty.

Unexpected positive cultures (UPCs) are very commonly found during shoulder arthroplasty when surgeons send intraoperative cultures to rule out periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) without clinical or radiographic signs of infection. Cutibacterium acnes is thought to be the most common bacteria cultured in this setting; however, the implications of an unexpected positive result are neither well defined nor agreed upon within the literature. The current review evaluates the incidence of UPCs and C acnes in reverse total arthroplasty; the clinical significance, if any, of these cultures; and various prognostic factors that may affect UPC incidence or recovery following PJI. A systematic review was performed with PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus databases. Inclusion criteria included studies published from January 1, 2000, to May 20, 2021, that specifically reported on UPCs, native or revision shoulder surgery, and any study that directly addressed one of our 6 proposed clinical questions. Two independent investigators initially screened 267 articles for further evaluation. Data on study design, UPC rate/speciation, UPC risk factors, and UPC outcomes were analyzed and described. A total of 22 studies met the inclusion criteria for this study. There was a pooled rate of 27.5% (653/2373) deep UPC specimen positivity, and C acnes represented 76.4% (499/653) of these positive specimens. Inanimate specimen positivity was reported at a pooled rate of 20.1% (29/144) across 3 studies. Male patients were more likely to have a UPC; however, the significance of prior surgery, surgical approach, and type of surgery conflicted across multiple articles. Patient-reported outcomes and reoperation rates did not differ between positive-UPC and negative-UPC patients. The utilization of antibiotics and treatment regimen varied across studies; however, the reinfection rates following surgery did not statistically differ based on the inclusion of antibiotics. UPCs are a frequent finding during shoulder surgery and C acnes represents the highest percentage of cultured bacteria. Various preoperative risk factors, surgical techniques, and postoperative treatment regimens did not significantly affect the incidence of UPCs as well as the clinical outcomes for UPC vs. non-UPC patients. A standardized protocol for treatment and follow-up would decrease physician uncertainty when faced with a UPC from shoulder surgery. Given the results of this review, shoulder surgeons can consider not drastically altering the postoperative clinical course in the setting of UPC with no other evidence of PJI.

Unexpected positive intraoperative cultures (UPIC) at index osseointegration do not lead to increased postoperative infectious events.

Introduction: The most common complication following transcutaneous osseointegration for amputees is infection. Although an obvious source of contamination is the permanent stoma, operative site contamination at the time of implantation may be an additional source. This study investigates the impact of unexpected positive intraoperative cultures (UPIC) on postoperative infection. Methods: Charts were reviewed for 8 patients with UPIC and 22 patients with negative intraoperative cultures (NIC) who had at least 1 year of post-osseointegration follow-up. All patients had 24 h of routine postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, with UPIC receiving additional antibiotics guided by culture results. The main outcome measure was postoperative infection intervention, which was graded as (0) none, (1) antibiotics unrelated to the initial surgery, (2) operative debridement with implant retention, or (3) implant removal. Results: The UPIC vs. NIC rate of infection management was as follows: Grade 0, 6/8 75 % vs. 14/22 64 %, p 0.682; Grade 1, 2/8 25 % vs. 8/22 36.4 % (Fisher's p 0.682); Grade 2, 1/8 = 12.5 % vs. 0/22 0 % (Fisher's p 0.267); Grade 3, 0/8 0 % vs. 1/22 4.5 % (Fisher's p 1.000). No differences were statistically significant. Conclusions: UPIC at index osseointegration, managed with directed postoperative antibiotics, does not appear to increase the risk of additional infection management. The therapeutic benefit of providing additional directed antibiotics versus no additional antibiotics following UPIC is unknown and did not appear to increase the risk of other adverse outcomes in our cohort.

Short-term Clinical Outcomes of Unexpected Culture-positive Cutibacterium acnes (Formerly Propionibacterium acnes) in Open Orthopaedic Surgery.

Introduction:The clinical significance and treatment recommendations for an unexpected positive Cutibacterium acnes (C acnes) culture remain unclear. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the clinical effect of a C acnes positive culture in patients undergoing open orthopaedic surgery.Methods:Patients with a minimum of one positive C acnes intraoperative culture were retrospectively reviewed over a 7-year period. True C acnes infection was defined as culture isolation from ≥1 specimens in the presence of clinical or laboratory indicators of infection.Results:Forty-eight patients had a positive intraoperative C acnes culture. 4.2% had a C acnes monoinfection, and 12.5% of the patients had a coinfection. The remainder was classified as indeterminate. Significant differences were identified between the indeterminate and true C acnes infection groups, specifically in patients with surgery history at the surgical site (P = 0.04), additional antibiotic therapy before surgery (P < 0 .001), and postoperative clinical signs of infection (P < 0 .001).Discussion:Suspicion for true C acnes infection should be raised in patients with surgery site history, antibiotic therapy before surgery, and clinical infectious signs. The indeterminate unexpected positive culture patients had a low risk of developing a true clinical infection that required antibiotic therapy.

The Prevalence and Outcomes of Unexpected Positive Intraoperative Cultures in Presumed Aseptic Revision Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe prevalence and outcomes of unexpected positive intraoperative cultures (UPC) in presumed aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of UPC and infection-free implant survival in this patient population. Secondly, we aimed to compare the infection-free implant survival between cohorts based on number of UPCs and antibiotic treatment. MethodsWe reviewed our institutional database from 2006 to 2019 for all TKA revisions (n = 1795) to identify all presumed aseptic TKA revisions with intraoperative culture(s). After exclusions, 775 revisions were eligible and those with UPC were included in the Kaplan-Meier analysis to determine infection-free implant survival for the cohorts. ResultsThe prevalence of UPC was 9.8%. The 2- and 5-year infection-free survival was 97.4% and 95.3%, respectively. The 5-year infection-free survival from the same microorganism as the UPC was 98.7%. Infection-free survival was similar for the 1 versus ≥2 UPC cohorts (P = .416), however was poorer for the cohort treated with antibiotics (P = .021). Only one of 3 subsequent PJI-related implant failures was caused by the same microorganism (polymicrobial) as the UPC. There were no subsequent infections in patients with a single UPC not treated with antibiotics. ConclusionsThe prevalence of UPC was 9.8% and the infection-free implant survival is excellent. Infection-free survivorship from PJI caused by the same UPC microorganism is outstanding. Comparisons between cohorts must be interpreted with caution due to study limitations. A single UPC in patents without other signs of infection does not require antibiotic treatment. Level of EvidenceIV.