Underwent Wedge Resection Research Articles

Choice of wedge resection for selected T1a/bN0M0 non-small cell lung cancer

Recently, several studies have reported that the survival benefit of wedge resection might not be inferior to that of lobectomy in early-stage NSCLC patients, but there is no unified definition of the details or cutoff value. Patients with early-stage NSCLC with a tumour size ≤ 2.0 cm were chosen from the SEER database. The influence of confounding factors was minimized by 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Kaplan‒Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) of patients undergoing lobectomy and wedge resection. A total of 3891 patients with early-stage NSCLC with tumour size ≤ 2.0 cm were enrolled, of whom 2839 underwent lobectomy and 1052 underwent wedge resection. Both before and after PSM, lobectomy significantly improved OS and LCSS compared with wedge resection in the unstratified study population. In the tumour size ≤ 1 cm group, lobectomy had better OS and LCSS than wedge resection (P < 0.05) before PSM; after PSM, there was no significant difference in OS (P = 0.16) and LCSS (P = 0.17). In Grade I patients, before PSM, lobectomy was superior to wedge resection in LCSS (P = 0.038), while there was no significant difference in OS (P = 0.16); after PSM, there were no significant differences in either OS (P = 0.78) or LCSS (P = 0.11). For early-stage NSCLC patients with a tumour size ≤ 1 cm or with a tumour size ≤ 2 cm and with Grade I, there was no significant difference in survival between wedge resection and lobectomy.

Predicting Recurrence after Sublobar Resection in Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma Using Preoperative Chest CT Scans.

Background Sublobar resection for lung cancer is usually guided by cutoff values for consolidation size (maximal diameter of the solid tumor component) and consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR). The effects of these factors as continuous variables and the reason for established cutoffs are, to the knowledge of the authors, unexplored. Purpose To quantitatively assess the predictive value of CTR and consolidation size for cancer recurrence risk after sublobar resection in clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma. Materials and Methods This retrospective study reviewed sublobar resection for clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma performed between January 2010 and December 2019. A restricted cubic spline function verified linearity by estimating recurrence probabilities using CTR and consolidation size obtained on preoperative CT scans. Statistical analyses included a Cox proportional hazards model to identify risk factors for cancer recurrence and the Cochran-Armitage trend test for the association between CTR and consolidation size. Results Of 1032 enrolled patients (age, 63.9 years ± 9.9 [SD]; 464 male patients), 523 (50.7%) and 509 (49.3%) underwent wedge resection and segmentectomy, respectively. Among patients with a CTR between 1% and 50% (n = 201), 187 (93.0%) had a consolidation size of less than or equal to 10 mm (P < .001). There was a positive association between the risk of recurrence with CTR and consolidation size (r2 = 0.727; P < .001). The recurrence rate showed the greatest increase when CTR was greater than 50% or consolidation size was greater than 10 mm. Specifically, the recurrence rate increased from 2.1% (three of 146) at 26%-50% CTR to 8.3% (nine of 108) at 51%-75% CTR, and from 4.4% (eight of 183) for 6-10-mm consolidation size to 11.9% (23 of 194) for 11-15-mm consolidation size. The probability of recurrence exhibited linearity and increased with CTR and consolidation size. Conclusion Cancer recurrence risk after sublobar resection for stage IA adenocarcinoma consistently rises with CTR and consolidation size. Current guideline cutoffs for sublobar resection remain clinically relevant given observed recurrence rates. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Extremely Rare Coexistence of Peripherally Located Mucous Gland Adenoma and Pulmonary Chondroid Hamartoma.

Pulmonary mucous gland adenomas (MGAs) originating in mucous-secreting cells in the bronchi are extremely rare benign tumours. Pulmonary chondroid hamartomas (PCHs) are the most common benign neoplasms of mesenchymal origin of the lung. This study reports an unusual case where MGA and PCH coexisted in a peripheral intra-parenchymal location. A patient with a 1-cm non-specific nodule in the left lung on a computed tomography scan underwent wedge resection. Microscopically, mesenchymal elements consisting of fat and cartilage tissue were observed. Mucous glands were present around these mesenchymal elements. No cellular atypia or mitosis was observed. This allowed for complete treatment without the need for a segmentectomy.

The role of wedge resection and lymph node examination in stage IA lung carcinoid tumors.

Current guidelines recommend anatomical resection and mediastinal lymph node resection for stage I to IIIA pulmonary carcinoids (PCs). The role of wedge resection in stage IA PCs remains controversial, previous studies focused on typical carcinoids (TCs) while differentiating histological subtypes preoperatively is not easy. We aimed to study the effect of wedge resection and lymph node examination (LNE) in patients with stage IA PCs. Patients who underwent anatomical and wedge resection for stage T1N0M0 lung carcinoid tumors between 2004 and 2019 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients were also divided into a non-LNE group and an LNE group. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to calculate and compare overall survival (OS). Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to balance the variables between groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were developed to determine prognostic factors. A total of 2,029 patients with bronchopulmonary carcinoid tumors were included in this study, 1,450 underwent lobectomy, 147 underwent segmentectomy and 432 underwent wedge resection. Initially, 5-year survival differed marginally between wedge and anatomical resection (91% vs. 95%, P=0.051), but lost significance after adjustment. LNE improved 5-year survival (95% vs. 89%, P=0.003), and this remained significant after adjustment. In multivariate cox analysis, LNE remained a significant variable while extent of resection was not. This result also remained consistent after adjustment. OS was comparable between wedge resection and anatomical resection when at least 1 lymph node was examined. For early-stage PC, wedge resection was not inferior to anatomical resection in terms of OS, while LNE significantly increased the survival in both multivariate and matched studies. The relationship between surgical extent and survival in the unadjusted study may be attributed to the lower rate of LNE in wedge resection. Our findings support wedge resection with emphasis on LNE in early-stage PCs.

Combined paravertebral and erector spinae plane block in non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic wedge resection: a case report

Thoracic surgery is often performed under general anesthesia, with intubation required. Less invasive surgical and anesthesiology approaches, such as a combination of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and regional nerve blocks, have been utilized to facilitate early recovery. In this case report, a patient undergoing VATS will be presented using thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) and erector spinae plane blocks (ESPB) as the primary anesthesia approach. A twenty-eight-year-old male patient with no known comorbidity had been evaluated for VATS to undergo wedge resection of the right middle lobe due to non-resolving repeated pneumothorax. As the patient had bullous lung presence at the contralateral side as well, invasive ventilation was deemed risky, and, as an alternative approach, real-time ultrasound-guide TPV and ESPB block were performed with intravenous midazolam 2 mg and fentanyl 50 mcg utilized to prevent anxiety and pain control. A total of 20 ml bupivacaine and 10 mL 2% lidocaine were used for nerve blocks and for maintenance of sedation; 2 mg midazolam, 50 mg ketamine, 50 mcg fentanyl, and 150 mg propofol were used within 90 minutes of operation. After VATS, the patient was admitted to the surgical intensive care unit, and no complication was observed post-operatively, with a successful transfer to the ward afterward. Maintenance of an unproblematic perioperative period is as paramount as the surgery itself. A combination of protocols, with the limitation of post-operative opioid usage by sedation and less invasive surgical methods, such as non-intubated VATS being presented in this case report, allows an earlier recovery period and less complication by preserving lung function. TPV and ESPB, in this case, granted exclusion of intubation, less invasive to thoracic epidural anesthesia, and control of possible complications due to an already bullous lung.

Lung adenocarcinoma manifested as ground-glass nodules in teenagers: characteristics, surgical outcomes and management strategies.

Ground-glass nodules-featured lung cancer have been identified in some teenagers in recent years. This study aims to investigate the characteristics and surgical outcomes of these patients and explore proper management strategy. Patients aged ≤20 with incidentally diagnosed lung cancer were retrospectively reviewed from February 2016 to March 2023. Based on lymph node evaluation status, these patients were divided into non-lymph node evaluation and lymph node evaluation groups. The clinical and pathological characteristics were analysed. A total of 139 teenage patients were included, with an obviously increased cases observed from 2019, corresponding to the COVID-19 pandemic. The median age of the 139 patients was 18 years (range 12-20). Eighty-five patients had pure ground-glass nodules, while others had mixed ground-glass nodules. The mean diameter of nodules was 8.87 ± 2.20 mm. Most of the patients underwent wedge resection (64%) or segmentectomy (31.7%). Fifty-two patients underwent lymph node sampling or dissection. None of these patients had lymph node metastasis. The majority of lesions were adenocarcinoma in situ (63 cases) and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (72 cases), while four lesions were invasive adenocarcinoma. The median follow-up time was 2.46 years, and none of these patients experienced recurrence or death during follow-up. The lymph node evaluation group had longer hospital stays (P < 0.001), longer surgery time (P < 0.001), and greater blood loss (P = 0.047) than the non-lymph node evaluation group. The COVID-19 pandemic significantly increased the number of teenage patients incidentally diagnosed with lung cancer, presenting as ground-glass nodules on CT scans. These patients have favourable surgical outcomes. We propose a management strategy for teenage patients, and suggest that sub-lobar resection without lymph node dissection may be an acceptable surgical procedure for these patients.

Comparison of segmentectomy and wedge resection for cT1cN0M0 non-small cell lung cancer.

Sublobar resection is considered a standard surgical procedure for early non-small cell lung cancer, although the survival of patients undergoing sublobar resection for clinical T1cN0M0 non-small cell lung cancer remains unclear. This study aimed to compare survival between segmentectomy and wedge resection for clinical T1cN0M0 non-small cell lung cancer. This retrospective study included patients who had undergone curative surgery for cT1cN0M0 stage IA3 non-small cell lung cancer. The overall and recurrence-free survival rates of 91 patients who underwent segmentectomy or wedge resection were compared. Thirty-nine (42.9%) and 52 patients (57.1%) were included in the segmentectomy and wedge resection groups, respectively. The median length of follow-up was 6.0years (95% confidence interval 4.2 - -years) (Kaplan-Meier estimate). The 5year overall survival rates were not significantly different between the segmentectomy and wedge resection groups (67.7% vs 52.0%, P = 0.132). The 5year recurrence-free survival rate was worse in the wedge resection group than in the segmentectomy group (66.6% vs 46.9%, P = 0.047). In univariable analysis, spread through air spaces (hazard ratio, 5.889; 95% confidence interval, 2.357-14.715; P < 0.001) was an important prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival in the wedge resection group. The overall survival of patients who underwent segmentectomy for clinical T1cN0M0 non-small cell lung cancer was not significantly different from that of patients who underwent wedge resection. However, patients with cT1cN0M0 non-small cell lung cancer who underwent wedge resection tended to have a worse recurrence-free survival prognosis than those who underwent segmentectomy.

What Is Early Recovery of Physical Abilities After Wedge Resection Surgery for Patients With Bone Tumor? An Observational Study

Background: The aim of this study is to describe the course of recovery of physical ability for patients undergoing lung wedge resection surgery for bone tumor metastases using the 1-minute sit-to-stand (1MSTS) test. Methods: All patients undergoing wedge resection for localized lung metastases from January 2022 to July 2023 were recruited consecutively. The recovery of physical performance was assessed by conducting the 1MSTS test the day before surgery and every day after surgery. A comparison was made between the number of repetitions performed in the preoperative test vs the performance on the sixth postoperative day. Results: A total of 52 patients were enrolled. The median age was 51 years and women made up 44.2% of the sample. The 1MSTS test on the sixth day was conducted in all patients with a median number of repetitions of 17.5, with a value comparable to the preoperative median. The patients able to recover to the preoperative repetitions were 38%. Multivariate analysis showed female gender as a protective factor and previous respiratory comorbidities and previous surgery to the upper limbs/trunk as risk factors. During preoperative assessment, higher heart rate and lower oxygen saturation (SpO2) after 1MSTS test were also predictors of a worse postoperative outcome. Conclusion: After wedge resection surgery for lung metastasis, the recovery of physical ability should be encouraged from the early postoperative phases and can be monitored through the use of the 1MSTS test during hospitalization. Aerobic training exercises in the preoperative phase may be useful to improve preoperative performance.

Is wedge resection equivalent to segmentectomy in pathological stage IA (≤2 cm) non-small cell lung cancers?

Sublobar resection (wedge resection and segmentectomy) has been established as an oncologically equivalent option to lobectomy for early-stage patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ≤ 2 cm. However, the optimal approach of sublobar resection remains subject to debate. In the present study we aimed to compare the oncological outcomes of wedge resection and segmentectomy in these patients. We identified patients with pT1a-bN0M0 NSCLC who underwent wedge resection and segmentectomy from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2010 and 2020. A Cox regression model and propensity-score matching (PSM) analysis were used. Overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. A total of 4190 patients met our selection criteria, including wedge resection in 3137 and segmentectomy in 1053. Patients undergoing wedge resection were less likely to have total lymph nodes resected (4 vs. 7, p < 0.001). Before PSM, patients undergoing segmentectomy had a higher 5-year OS rate (87.75% vs. 82.72%; p = 0.0023), while exhibiting a similar LCSS rate (93.45% vs. 92.73%; p = 0.32). After PSM, segmentectomy consistently demonstrated significantly better OS and there was no statistically significant difference in LCSS. Analysis of causes of death revealed that a higher incidence of deaths related to other causes among patients undergoing wedge resection compared to those undergoing segmentectomy. Both wedge resection and segmentectomy yield comparable oncological outcomes for patients with NSCLC ≤ 2 cm, although segmentectomy exhibits superior OS due to less death related to other causes.

Comparison of early patient-reported outcomes between uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy and wedge resection for peripheral small-sized non-small-cell lung cancer

BackgroundAnalysis of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) offers valuable insights into distinguishing the effects of closely related medical procedures from the patient’s perspective. In this study we compared symptom burden in patients undergoing uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy and wedge resection for peripheral small-sized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsThis study included patients with peripheral NSCLC from an ongoing longitudinal prospective cohort study (CN-PRO-Lung 3) who underwent segmentectomy or wedge resection with tumor diameter ≤ 2 cm and consolidation tumor ratio (CTR) ≤ 0.5. PROs data were collected using the Perioperative Symptom Assessment for Lung Surgery questionnaire pre-operatively, daily post-surgery up to the fourth hospitalization day, and weekly post-discharge up to the fourth week. Propensity score matching and a generalized estimation equation model were employed to compare symptom severity. In addition, short-term clinical outcomes were compared.ResultsIn total, data of 286 patients (82.4%) undergoing segmentectomy and 61 patients (17.6%) undergoing wedge resection were extracted from the cohort. No statistically significant differences were found in the proportion of moderate-to-severe symptoms and mean scores for pain, cough, shortness of breath, disturbed sleep, fatigue, drowsiness, and distress during the 4-day postoperative hospitalization or the 4-week post-discharge period before or after matching (all p > 0.05). Compared with segmentectomy, wedge resection showed better short-term clinical outcomes, including shorter operative time (p = 0.001), less intraoperative bleeding (p = 0.046), and lower total hospital costs (p = 0.002).ConclusionsThe study findings indicate that uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy and wedge resection exert similar early postoperative symptom burden in patients with peripheral NSCLC (tumor diameter ≤ 2 cm and CTR ≤ 0.5).Clinical trial registrationNot applicable.

Lung cancer after kidney transplantation: a 50-year experience at a single institution

PurposeTo investigate the clinical characteristics of lung cancer that develops after kidney transplantation.MethodsThe clinical data of patients with lung cancer diagnosed after kidney transplantation were collected retrospectively. The medical records were extracted from our database. All patients underwent routine chest examination after kidney transplantation.ResultsIn total, 17 lung tumors were detected in 15 (0.6%) of 2593 patients who underwent kidney transplantation at our institution. Eleven lung tumors were completely resected from a collective 10 patients (surgical group). The remaining five patients did not receive surgical treatment (nonsurgical group). The surgical group underwent wedge resection (n = 5), segmentectomy (n = 1), lobectomy (n = 3), and bilobectomy (n = 1). The pathological stages were 0 (n = 1), IA1 (n = 2), IA2 (n = 4), IA3 (n = 2), and IB (n = 1). The surgical group had a significantly better prognosis than the nonsurgical group. There were no perioperative complications related to kidney transplantation in either group.ConclusionsRoutine chest examination would be useful for the early diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer after kidney transplantation. Moreover, surgical resection for early-stage lung cancer was associated with a better prognosis for kidney transplantation patients.

Wedge Resection versus Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Tumors ≤8 mm.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the overall survival of patients with ≤8 mm non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who undergo wedge resection versus stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Kaplan-Meier analysis, multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling, and propensity score-matched analysis were performed to evaluate the overall survival of patients with ≤8 mm NSCLC in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2017 who underwent wedge resection versus patients who underwent SBRT. The above-mentioned matched analyses were repeated for patients with no comorbidities. Patients who were coded in the NCDB as having undergone radiation because surgery was contraindicated due to patient risk factors (e.g., comorbid conditions, advance age, etc.) and those with a history of prior malignancy were excluded from analysis. Of the 1505 patients who had NSCLC ≤8 mm during the study period, 1339 (89%) patients underwent wedge resection, and 166 (11%) patients underwent SBRT. In the unadjusted analysis, multivariable Cox modeling and propensity score-matched analysis, wedge resection was associated with improved survival when compared to SBRT. These results were consistent in a sensitivity analysis limited to patients with no comorbidities.

Wedge resection, segmentectomy, and lobectomy: oncologic outcomes based on extent of surgical resection for ≤2 cm stage IA non-small cell lung cancer.

Long-standing controversy has existed over whether sublobar resection is an adequate oncological procedure for clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ≤2 cm, despite the recent randomized trial reports of Japanese Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 0802 and Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 140503 demonstrating non-inferior outcomes with sublobar resection compared to lobectomy. As practice patterns shift, we sought to compare oncologic outcomes in patients with these early-stage tumors after wedge resection, segmentectomy, or lobectomy in a contemporary, real-world, cohort. A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database from a single institution was conducted from 2011 to 2020 to identify all patients with clinically staged IA1 or IA2 NSCLC (tumors ≤2 cm with no nodal involvement). The primary outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), with secondary outcomes of lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS), recurrence patterns, and perioperative morbidity and mortality. A total of 480 patients were identified; 93 (19.4%) patients underwent wedge resection, 90 (18.7%) received segmentectomy, and 297 (61.9%) underwent lobectomy. Patients who underwent wedge resection had worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (23.7% ECOG 1 or 2 vs. 5.6% among segmentectomy and 5.4% among lobectomy, P<0.05). Both wedge resection and segmentectomy patients had lower preoperative mean percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (%FEV1) compared to the lobectomy group (81.8% and 82.6% vs. 89.6%, P=0.002), a higher proportion of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and interstitial lung disease (ILD), and a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index. There were no statistically significant differences in 5-year OS, DFS, or LCSS between groups: 90%, 61%, 78% for wedge resections compared with 85%, 75%, 86% for segmentectomy, and 87%, 77%, 87% for lobectomy, respectively. Recurrence was observed in 17 patients who underwent wedge resection (18.3%, 8 local, 9 distant), 12 patients who received segmentectomy (13.4%, 6 local, 6 distant), and 38 patients who underwent lobectomy (12.8%, 11 local, 27 distant), which was not significantly different (P=0.36). Patients with inferior performance status or lower baseline pulmonary function are more likely to receive wedge resection for clinical stage IA NSCLC ≤2 cm in size. For these small tumors, lobectomy, segmentectomy, and wedge resection provide comparable oncologic outcomes.

Margin quality analysis for wedge resection of lung cancer and construction of a predictive model.

Insufficient pulmonary wedge resection margin is associated with malignant positive margins and high local recurrence risk for lung cancer. This study aimed to identify the risk factors of insufficient or guideline discordant resection margin distance and establish a predictive model to preoperatively estimate the risk of discordant margin for individual patient. Guideline discordant resection margin was defined as ratio of resection margin distance to tumor size less than one. Patients who had pulmonary malignancies and underwent wedge resection between April 2014 and February 2023 were enrolled and stratified by quality of resection margin. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to identify risk factors of guideline discordant margin and a predictive model was developed. Data from March 2023 to January 2024 were collected for internal validation. A total of 530 patients were included. The incidence of guideline discordant wedge resection margin was 37.2%. Longer tumor's max distance to pleura and larger tumor size were variables associated with increased risk and included in the final model. Preoperative localization and right-side surgery were protective variables in the predictive model. A nomogram was built based on the predictive model. The model showed satisfying predictive performance with a concordance index of 0.720 for the predictive model, and 0.761 for internal validation. The goodness-if-fit tests were non-significant for both model development and internal validation data set. The preoperative predictive model and nomogram show good predictive performance to estimate the risk of guideline discordant wedge resection margin. Individualized surgical plans or preoperative nodule localization can be made for high-risk patients.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database Analysis: Comparing Sublobar Techniques in Stage IA Lung Cancer

BackgroundThis study compares sublobar resections—wedge resection and segmentectomy—in clinical stage IA lung cancers. It tests the hypothesis that overall survival after wedge resection is similar to segmentectomy. MethodsAdults undergoing wedge resection or segmentectomy for clinical stage IA lung cancer were identified from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database. Eligible patients were linked to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services database using a matching algorithm. The primary outcome was long-term overall survival. Propensity scores overlap weighting (PSOW) adjustment of wedge resection using validated covariates was used for group difference mitigation. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models analyzed survival. All-cause first readmission, and morbidity and mortality were examined using PSOW regression models. ResultsOf 9756 patients, 6141 met inclusion criteria, comprising 2154 segmentectomies and 3987 wedge resections. PSOW reduced differences between the groups. Unadjusted perioperative mortality was comparable, but wedge resection showed lower major morbidity rates. Weighted regression analysis indicated reduced mortality and major morbidity risks in wedge resection. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no mortality difference between groups, which was confirmed by PSOW Cox regression models. The cumulative risk of readmission was also comparable for both groups, with Cox Fine-Gray models showing no difference in rehospitalization risks. ConclusionsIn clinical stage IA lung cancer, relative to segmentectomy, wedge resection has comparable overall survival and lower perioperative morbidity, suggesting it is an equally effective option for the broader population of patients with clinical stage IA lung cancer, not only those at highest risk of complications.

Selection of the appropriate treatment for the combination of interstitial lung disease and lung cancer: A retrospective observational study.

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) independently heightens the risk of lung cancer (LC), often necessitating chemoradiotherapy (CRT) due to advanced disease stages. However, CRT may compromise survival through complications such as ILD exacerbation or radiation pneumonitis. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal surgical or nonsurgical treatment approaches for patients with concurrent ILD and LC. Over a 10-year period, a retrospective evaluation was conducted on 647 patients with confirmed diagnoses of LC and ILD from a total of 4541 patients examined in the polyclinic. This assessment included a comprehensive review of demographic, treatment, and survival records. Study groups included those treated for both ILD and LC with surgical treatment (ST), chemotherapy (CT), radiotherapy (RT), or CRT. A control group comprised ILD-only cases. In the whole sample of 647 patients with complete data, the length of stay in hospital and respiratory intensive care unit was significantly shorter in the ST group and longer in the CT group. Significant differences in discharge status (P < .001) were observed, with higher recovery rates in the ST and RT groups. The CT group showed an increased rate of transfer to other centers, in-hospital mortality was determined to be higher in the CRT group, and the control group exhibited no change in discharge. No statistically significant difference was determined between the groups with respect to the 24- and 48-month survival rates (P = .100). Although no disparity was found in 2- and 4-year survival rates, there were seen to be advantages in survival and quality of life with the addition of radiotherapy to regions aligning with surgical margins for LC patients with ILD, evaluated as radiological N0, undergoing wedge resection. This underscores the need for personalized treatment strategies to balance effective cancer control and to minimize ILD-related complications.

Can a stapling device with bioabsorbable polyglycolic acid felt reduce intraoperative air leak?

Currently, it is unknown whether polyglycolic acid (PGA) felt staplers can reduce the occurrence of intraoperative air leaks. We investigated whether staplers with bioabsorbable PGA felt reduced intraoperative air leakage compared to the conventional stapler in patients undergoing lung resection. From 2013 to 2021, 211 patients diagnosed with lung cancer or pulmonary metastasis underwent lung resection using only PGA felt (n=88) or conventional (n=123) staplers at Tokyo Rosai Hospital. One-to-one propensity score matching was used to compare intraoperative air leak rates, operation time, and intraoperative bleeding between the two groups. The PGA felt group required more staples than the conventional stapler group. The forced expiratory volume in one second percentage of predicted in the PGA felt stapler group was lower than that in the conventional stapler group. In the PGA felt stapler group, 56.8% of patients had undergone anatomic lung resection, whereas 29.3% of patients in the conventional stapler group had undergone wedge resection. In a propensity-matched analysis of 67 pairs, the occurrence of intraoperative air leaks was significantly lower in the PGA felt stapler group than in the conventional stapler group (16.4% vs. 56.7%, P<0.001). The operation time was significantly shorter and intraoperative bleeding was significantly lower in the PGA felt stapler group than in the conventional stapler group (P=0.001 and P=0.016, respectively). Pulmonary resection using staplers with a PGA felt could reduce the occurrence of intraoperative air leaks among patients undergoing lung resection.

Outcomes of Completion Lobectomy for Locoregional Recurrence after Sublobar Resection in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

This retrospective study aimed to determine the treatment patterns and the surgical and oncologic outcomes after completion lobectomy (CL) in patients with locoregionally recurrent stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who previously underwent sublobar resection. Data from 36 patients who initially underwent sublobar resection for clinical, pathological stage IA NSCLC and experienced locoregional recurrence between 2008 and 2016 were analyzed. Thirty-six (3.6%) of 1,003 patients who underwent sublobar resection for NSCLC experienced locoregional recurrence. The patients' median age was 66.5 (range, 44-77) years at the initial operation, and 28 (77.8%) patients were men. Six (16.7%) patients underwent segmentectomy and 30 (83.3%) underwent wedge resection as the initial operation. The median follow-up from the initial operation was 56 (range, 9-150) months. Ten (27.8%) patients underwent CL, 22 (61.1%) underwent non-surgical treatments (chemotherapy, radiation, concurrent chemoradiation therapy), and 4 (11.1%) did not receive treatment or were lost to follow-up after recurrence. Patients who underwent CL experienced no significant complications or deaths. The median follow-up time after CL was 64.5 (range, 19-93) months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and post-recurrence survival (PRS) were higher in the surgical group than in the non-surgical (p<0.001) and no-treatment groups (p<0.001). CL is a technically demanding but safe procedure for locoregionally recurrent stage I NSCLC after sublobar resection. Patients who underwent CL had better OS and PRS than patients who underwent non-surgical treatments or no treatments; however, a larger cohort study and long-term surveillance are necessary.

Prognostic Factors among Patients with Resected Non-Adenocarcinoma of the Lung

Introduction: Few studies have investigated the prognostic factors for non-adenocarcinoma of the lung. We retrospectively evaluated the prognostic factors on the basis of histological type of non-adenocarcinoma of the lung treated by pulmonary resection. Methods: We enrolled 266 patients with non-adenocarcinoma of the lung in this retrospective study: 196 with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and 70 with non-SCC. Results: Relapse-free survival (RFS) did not differ significantly between SCC and non-SCC patients (p = 0.33). For SCC patients, RFS differed significantly between patients who underwent wedge resection and non-wedge resection (p < 0.01) and between patients with Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3a and 0–2 postoperative complications (p < 0.01). For non-SCC patients, RFS rates were significantly different in the groups divided at neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio = 2.40 (p = 0.02), maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) = 8.39 (p < 0.01), between patients with pathological stage (pStage) 0–I and with pStage more than II (p < 0.01). For SCC patients, male sex (p = 0.04), wedge resection (p = 0.01), and Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3a (p = 0.02) were significant factors for RFS in multivariate analysis. For non-SCC patients, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio >2.40 (p < 0.01), SUVmax >8.39 (p = 0.01), and pStage ≥II (p = 0.03) were significant factors for RFS in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: RFS did not differ significantly differently between SCC and non-SCC patients. It is necessary to perform more than segmentectomy and to avoid severe postoperative complications for SCC patients. SUVmax might be an adaptation criterion of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with non-adenocarcinoma and non-SCC of the lung.

Outcomes of mobilization in the first hour following uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax.

Although primary spontaneous pneumothorax is a common disease in young adults, each thoracic surgery department performs different procedures for its management. The optimal time of postoperative mobilization is not yet standardized in lung surgery. This study included male patients with a primary spontaneous pneumothorax who underwent wedge resection of the upper lobe of the lungs via uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Patients were encouraged to stand up within the first postoperative hour. Mobilization was defined as standing and walking at least 100 m from the bed. If orthostatic hypotension occurred, mobilization was postponed for 30 min. Immediately after surgery, intravenous fluids were discontinued, and patients were instructed to drink water. The analgesic treatment needs, length of hospitalization, drainage, and discharge times were recorded. A total of 43 patients were operated on by the same surgeon. All operations were ended with uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Wedge resection is most commonly indicated for recurrent ipsilateral pneumothorax. Patients walked 345 (range: 150-510) m on the department corridor following bed rest. Paracetamol (2 g) and dexketoprofen (100 mg) were intravenously administered as postoperative analgesia to 76.7% of patients. Narcotic drugs were not needed. Mobilization was recommended in the first hour following uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax.