Undergoing Radical Radiotherapy Research Articles

Supraclavicular lymph node metastasis should not be defined as regional lymph node metastasis in cervical and upper thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

The importance of supraclavicular lymph node (SCLN) metastasis in cervical and upper thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has not been determined. The aim of the present study was to provide a detailed definition of the range of SCLN regions and to explore whether SCLNs should be considered as a regional lymph nodes for patients with cervical and upper thoracic ESCC. A retrospective analysis was performed on 230 patients with locally advanced cervical or upper thoracic ESCC who underwent radical radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The range of SCLN regions was defined in detail on contrast enhanced computed tomography images of the neck. According to whether the patient had lymph node metastasis in the supraclavicular region, the included patients were divided into two groups, and the survival differences and reasons for treatment failure between the two groups were analyzed. Of the 230 patients with ESCC, 71 (30.87%) exhibited lymph node metastases in the supraclavicular region. The median overall survival time of ESCC patients with and without SCLN metastasis was 17 and 30 months, respectively (P<0.001). After propensity score matching (PSM), the median overall survival time of ESCC patients with and without SCLN metastasis was 17 and 28 months, respectively (P<0.001). During the follow-up period, there were a total of 101 cases of failure of treatment in the irradiation field, 6 cases had esophageal metastasis in the non-irradiated field and 27 cases had regional lymph node metastasis in the non-irradiated field. In addition, there were 33 cases of metastasis to the distant lymph nodes or organs. There was no significant difference in the local treatment failure rate between the groups with or without SCLN metastasis in both the irradiation field and the non-irradiation field, but the probability of distant metastasis in the SCLN metastasis group was significantly higher than that in the group without SCLN metastasis (P=0.025). In conclusion, patients with cervical and upper thoracic ESCC with SCLN metastasis have a poor prognosis and the median overall survival time is closer to that of metastatic ESCC than ESCC with regional lymph node metastasis; therefore, SCLNs should not be defined as regional lymph nodes in patients with cervical and upper thoracic ESCC.

Outcome of Patients with Early Glottic Laryngeal Carcinoma Treated with Radical Radiotherapy

Introduction: Glottic cancer is the most common laryngeal cancer and it has the most favorable prognosis, mainly if diagnosed early. Ideally, early glottic cancer (T1–T2 N0) should be managed with a single modality either microsurgery or definitive Radiotherapy. The local control rate with definitive radiotherapy is approximately 83–95% for T1 and 70–80% for T2 lesions. This study intends to find out the treatment outcome in early glottic cancer treated with radical radiation treatment from 1st January 2014 to 31st December 2019 at our center. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of medical records and radiation charts of all patients of early stage glottis cancer who underwent radiation treatment from 1st January 2014 to 31st December 2019 at our centre. The statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 20.0.Continuous variables such as age was summarized in terms of either mean ± Standard Deviation or median (inter quartile range) depending on the statistical distribution of data. Categorical variables were e pressed in terms of frequency and percentage. Survival analysis was done using Kaplan Meier curves. Results: A total of 91 patients underwent radical radiation for early glottic carcinoma at our centre. The median age was 63 years (42-85 years). Out of them 94% were males and 6% were females. 78% of patients had stage 1 disease and 22% had stage 11 disease. 52% of patients had co morbidities and 48% did not have any comorbidity All cases had Squamous cell carcinoma histology. 59% of patients had anterior commissure involvement. 12 out of 91 (13%) patients developed local recurrence on follow up. The five year disease free survival was 84.3%. The five year overall survival was 87.7%. There was a statistically significant difference in survival between stage I and stage II. Conclusion: For T1–T2 glottic carcinomas, definitive RT can provide a good term local control and survival with the preservation of the normal structure and function of larynx.

Pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for primary prophylaxis of neutropenia in patients with cervical cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a prospective study

BackgroundThis study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) for primary prophylaxis of neutropenia in patients with cervical cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy.MethodsIn this prospective, single-center, single-arm study, we enrolled patients (18–70 years) with 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC1r-IVA and IVB (distant metastasis only with inguinal lymph node metastasis) cervical cancer. Eligible patients should have normal function of the bone marrow (absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 2.0 × 109/L) and adequate hepatic and renal functions. Key exclusion criteria included: previous chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy; a history of bone marrow dysplasia or other hematopoietic abnormalities. All patients underwent radical radiotherapy (pelvic radiotherapy or extended-field irradiation) plus brachytherapy. The chemotherapy regimen included four cycles of 3-weekly paclitaxel and cisplatin. PEG-rhG-CSF was administered 48–72 h after each treatment cycle. Salvage granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was only permitted in certain circumstances. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade 3–4 neutropenia. The secondary endpoints included frequency of febrile neutropenia (FN), chemotherapy completion rate in cycles 2–4, time to complete radiotherapy, and safety.ResultsOverall, 52 patients were enrolled in this study from July 2019 to October 2020. The incidence of grade 3–4 neutropenia was 28.8%, with an average duration of grade 3–4 neutropenia persistence of 3.85 days (1–7 days). The incidence rate of FN was 3.8%. The chemotherapy completion rate was 94.2%, 82.7%, and 75.0% for cycles 2–4, respectively. The incidences of grade 3–4 neutropenia for cycles 1–4 were 9.6% (5/52), 8.2% (4/49), 14.0% (6/43), and 2.6% (1/39), respectively. All patients completed radiotherapy within 8 weeks (median, 48 days; range: 41–56 days), except one patient who withdrew consent and did not receive radiotherapy. Severe non-hematologic toxicity was not observed in any patient.ConclusionPEG-rhG-CSF is an effective and safe prophylactic treatment for neutropenia in patients with cervical cancer undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900024494. Date of Registration:13/July/2019.

Pairwise machine learning-based automatic diagnostic platform utilizing CT images and clinical information for predicting radiotherapy locoregional recurrence in elderly esophageal cancer patients.

To investigate the feasibility and accuracy of predicting locoregional recurrence (LR) in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) who underwent radical radiotherapy using a pairwise machine learning algorithm. The 130 datasets enrolled were randomly divided into a training set and a testing set in a 7:3 ratio. Clinical factors were included and radiomics features were extracted from pretreatment CT scans using pyradiomics-based software, and a pairwise naive Bayes (NB) model was developed. The performance of the model was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and decision curve analysis (DCA). To facilitate practical application, we attempted to construct an automated esophageal cancer diagnosis system based on trained models. To the follow-up date, 64 patients (49.23%) had experienced LR. Ten radiomics features and two clinical factors were selected for modeling. The model demonstrated good prediction performance, with area under the ROC curve of 0.903 (0.829-0.958) for the training cohort and 0.944 (0.849-1.000) for the testing cohort. The corresponding accuracies were 0.852 and 0.914, respectively. Calibration curves showed good agreement, and DCA curve confirmed the clinical validity of the model. The model accurately predicted LR in elderly patients, with a positive predictive value of 85.71% for the testing cohort. The pairwise NB model, based on pre-treatment enhanced chest CT-based radiomics and clinical factors, can accurately predict LR in elderly patients with ESCC. The esophageal cancer automated diagnostic system embedded with the pairwise NB model holds significant potential for application in clinical practice.

Impact of Radiation on Dysphagia-Related Structures: A Dosimetric and Clinical Comparative Analysis of Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Techniques in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.

Introduction Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)is a significant health concern in India, with around one million new cases annually. The prevalence of HNSCC is notably high in Asia, especially in India, due to habitslike tobacco chewing, betel nut usage, and alcohol consumption. Treatment typically involves a combination of surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and biological therapy, aiming for tumor control while preserving function and quality of life. However, survivors often face long-term side effectslike difficulty swallowing, leading to complicationssuch as aspiration pneumonia. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has shown promise in improving outcomes by sparing critical swallowing structures. Efforts to minimize radiation-related dysphagia are crucial for enhancing patients' quality of life post-treatment. Our study focuses on examining dosimetric parameters associated with dysphagia aspiration, alongside evaluating dysphagia grades in both treatment groups using the RTOGscale. Material and methods Patients with histologically confirmed non-metastatic head and neck carcinomas were included in our study in November 2018-April 2020. A total of 56 patients were taken into our study with 28 in each arm. They underwent radical radiotherapy (RT) with a total dose of 66-70 Gy, with or without concurrent chemotherapy, meeting specific inclusion criteria and excluding those receiving reirradiation or with distant metastasis. Patients were divided into two groups: Group I received three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), and Group II received IMRT. Treatment planning involved immobilization, CT imaging, delineation of target volumes and organs at risk, and contouring of swallowing structures. Dose-volume histogram parameters (mean dose, maximum dose, V30, V70, V80, D50, and D80) were used to assess mean dose to swallowing structures outside the planning target volume (PTV), with a mean dose constraint of 50 Gy. Dysphagia was evaluated using the RTOGcriteria at baseline, during treatment, and six months post-treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results In our study, the mean age at presentation differed slightly between the IMRT and 3D-CRT arms: 58 years versus 55 years, respectively. A higher proportion of patients in both arms experienced symptoms for three to six months, with 53.6% in 3D-CRT and 42.9% in IMRT. Stage distribution varied, with IV being most common in 3D-CRT and stage II in IMRT. Approximately 56% of patients in both groups had a history of smoking. Significant differences were observed in spinal cord dose between 3DCRT and IMRT techniques (p < 0.001). Similarly, a significant difference was found in the mean dose received by dysphagia aspiration-related structures (DARSs) between the 3D-CRT and IMRT arms (p = 0.04). Patients in the IMRT arm exhibited superior dysphagia grades compared to those in the 3D-CRT arm, with statistical significance observed in the third month (p = 0.008) and sixth month (p = 0.048). Conclusion Our study found a notable decrease in the mean DARS dose and reduced dysphagia severity at three and six months in the IMRT group compared to the 3D-CRT group. However, due to the diverse study population, establishing a definitive correlation between the DARS dose and dysphagia severity was challenging. Future large-scale studies are needed to validate these findings for improved preservation of DARS structures.

Explainable deep learning-based survival prediction for non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing radical radiotherapy

Background and purposeSurvival is frequently assessed using Cox proportional hazards (CPH) regression; however, CPH may be too simplistic as it assumes a linear relationship between covariables and the outcome. Alternative, non-linear machine learning (ML)-based approaches, such as random survival forests (RSFs) and, more recently, deep learning (DL) have been proposed; however, these techniques are largely black-box in nature, limiting explainability. We compared CPH, RSF and DL to predict overall survival (OS) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving radiotherapy using pre-treatment covariables. We employed explainable techniques to provide insights into the contribution of each covariable on OS prediction. Materials and methodsThe dataset contained 471 stage I-IV NSCLC patients treated with radiotherapy. We built CPH, RSF and DL OS prediction models using several baseline covariable combinations. 10-fold Monte-Carlo cross-validation was employed with a split of 70%:10%:20% for training, validation and testing, respectively. We primarily evaluated performance using the concordance index (C-index) and integrated Brier score (IBS). Local interpretable model-agnostic explanation (LIME) values, adapted for use in survival analysis, were computed for each model. ResultsThe DL method exhibited a significantly improved C-index of 0.670 compared to the CPH and a significantly improved IBS of 0.121 compared to the CPH and RSF approaches. LIME values suggested that, for the DL method, the three most important covariables in OS prediction were stage, administration of chemotherapy and oesophageal mean radiation dose. ConclusionWe show that, using pre-treatment covariables, a DL approach demonstrates superior performance over CPH and RSF for OS prediction and use explainable techniques to provide transparency and interpretability.

The Prehabilitation Radiotherapy Exercise, smoking Habit cessation and Balanced diet Study (PREHABS) protocol to explore the feasibility of embedding behavioural modifications into the clinical pathway for patients undergoing radical radiotherapy for lung cancer

Patients with curable non-surgical lung cancer are often current smokers, have co-existing medical comorbidities and are treated with curative radiotherapy. To maximise the benefits of modern radiotherapy, there is an...

Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Stage III C Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Radiotherapy or Radiochemotherapy.

Objective: Since the update of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging criteria, there have been few reports on the prognosis of stage III C cervical cancer. Moreover, some studies have drawn controversial conclusions, necessitating further verification. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes and determine the prognostic factors for stage III C cervical cancer patients treated with radical radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy. Methods: The data of 117 stage III C cervical cancer patients (98 III C1 and 19 III C2) who underwent radical radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. We evaluated 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were analyzed using the Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard regression model. The risk of para-aortic lymph node metastasis (LNM) in all patients was assessed through Chi-squared test and logistic regression analysis. Results: For stage III C1 and III C2 patients, the 3-year OS rates were 77.6% and 63.2% (P = .042), and the 3-year DFS rates were 70.4% and 47.4% (P = .003), respectively. The pretreatment location of pelvic LNM, histological type, and FIGO stage was associated with OS (P = .033, .003, .042, respectively); the number of pelvic LNM and FIGO stage were associated with DFS (P = .015, .003, respectively). The histological type was an independent prognostic indicator for OS, and the numbers of pelvic LNM and FIGO stage were independent prognostic indicators for DFS. Furthermore, a pelvic LNM largest short-axis diameter ≥ 1.5 cm and the presence of common iliac LNM were identified as high-risk factors influencing para-aortic LNM in stage III C patients (P = .046, .006, respectively). Conclusions: The results of this study validated the 2018 FIGO staging criteria for stage III C cervical cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy. These findings may enhance our understanding of the updated staging criteria and contribute to better management of patients in stage III C.

Prognostic Value of Tumor Volume Reduction during Radiotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer in Different Risk Groups

To evaluate the risk factors of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) undergoing radical radiotherapy (with or without concurrent chemotherapy) and to assess the prognostic value of tumor volume regression (TVR) based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in different risk groups. A retrospective analysis was performed on 176 individuals diagnosed with stage IIA-IVA cervical cancer (CC) who underwent radical intensity-modulated radiotherapy in our center between January 2012 and December 2020. The tumor volume before radiotherapy (TVp) and before brachytherapy (TVmid) were evaluated based on three-dimensional MRI images, TVR = (TVp -TVmid)/TVp × 100%. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess patient's overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Prognostic factors were identified using Cox proportional hazards models. For the entire cohort, patients with TVR ≥ 94% had better 5-year OS (82.7% vs 49.8%, p<0.001) and 5-year PFS (82.5% vs 51.1%, p<0.001) compared to TVR < 94%. Patients with TVR ≥ 94% were more likely to receive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) than those with TVR < 94% (70.1% vs 40.5%, p<0.05). Among patients undergoing CCRT, those with a TVR ≥ 94% had a better prognosis than those with a TVR < 94%. However, among patients who received RT alone, those with TVR ≥ 94% had better PFS but no statistically significant difference in OS. Likewise, among patients with CYFRA21-1 < 7.7 ng/ml, patients with TVR ≥ 94% had a better prognosis. However, TVR was not a prognostic factor in patients with CYFRA21-1 ≥ 7.7 ng/ml. Both CYFRA21-1 (OS, PFS interaction, p<0.001) and FIGO stage (PFS interaction, p = 0.035) were found to significantly impact predictive effects of TVR. In LACC patients with CRYFA21-1 < 7.7 ng/ml who received CCRT, TVR was an important prognostic factor. However, in patients with CRYFA21-1 ≥ 7.7 ng/ml who received RT alone, the prognostic value of TVR needs to be further explored.

Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Fixed Field Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Radical Treatment of Early Prostate Cancer using Hypofractionated Radiotherapy

Objective: To investigate the dosimetric advantages of volumetric modulated arc therapy over intensity-modulated radiation therapy for radical treatment of early-stage prostate cancer.&#x0D; Study Design: Retrospective longitudinal study.&#x0D; Place and Duration of Study: Department of Radiation Oncology, Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Jan to Jun 2019.&#x0D; Methodology: Two treatment plans; one volumetric modulated arc therapy and other intensity-modulated radiation therapy, were made for 13 patients undergoing radical radiotherapy for early prostate cancer. Conformity index, Homogeneity index, the volume of rectum and bladder receiving a dose of 50 Gy or more, monitor units employed and treatment delivery time were compared between both techniques.&#x0D; Results: Volumetric modulated arc therapy plans showed statistically better conformity index and Homogeneity index with significantly lower doses to the rectum and bladder than intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans. The number of monitor units (MUs) employed and treatment delivery time were also reduced significantly with volumetric modulated arc therapy.&#x0D; Conclusion: Volumetric modulated arc therapy generates dose-metrically better radiotherapy plans than intensity-modulated radiation therapy and can deliver the required dose faster.Keywords: Hypofractionated radiotherapy, Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, Prostate cancer, Volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Prospective dynamic sampling and molecular residual disease monitoring to predict clinical outcomes for patients with unresectable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer undergoing radical radiotherapy.

8549 Background: The role of molecular residual disease (MRD) detection in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients after definitive resection has been progressively elaborated. However, the dynamic patterns of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) during and after radical radiotherapy (RT) remain unclear but are critical for detecting MRD in this context. Methods: We enrolled 139 patients with locally advanced NSCLC treated with radical RT in this prospective study. And 761 blood samples were successfully detected by ctDNA-MRD assay at different preset timepoints before, during and after RT. Results: There was a declining trend in ctDNA concentrations of “during RT” time point (RT reached 40 Gy) relative to those after RT. Patients with negative ctDNA of “during RT” and “after RT” time points may indicate an early response to RT, and had better progression-free survival (PFS) than those with late response to RT(ctDNA clearance only at “after RT” time point, HR = 0.30, 95%CI: 0.12-0.75, p = 0.004). Moreover, patients with both negative ctDNA of “during RT” and “after RT” time points could not benefit from consolidation therapy (HR = 0.72, 95%CI: 0.29-1.78, p = 0.478), while patients with any positive ctDNA of them could (HR = 0.59, 95%CI: 0.38-0.93, p = 0.023).The sensitivity of longitudinal MRD was 97.8% and only two patients with local progression were overlooked. The 2-year cancer-specific PFS of patients with longitudinal undetectable MRD was 88.4%, which corresponds to the potentially cured population. For patients with only blood-informed MRD detection, the sensitivity and median lead time of longitudinal MRD were 97.7% and 3.9 months, respectively, which indicating the feasibility and efficacy of blood-informed MRD detection strategy. Conclusions: These data shed new light on the ctDNA-MRD detection for localized NSCLC patients who received radical RT.

Treatment Outcome of Early-stage Laryngeal Carcinoma Treated with Radical Radiotherapy Using Different Techniques: A Retrospective Study

Aim: The aim was to evaluate the treatment outcomes and prognostic characteristics of patients with early-stage glottic laryngeal carcinoma who underwent radical radiotherapy (RT) with different techniques.Materials and Methods: Radiotherapy was applied using the 2D conventional technique, 3DCRT (three dimensional conformal radiotherapy and IMRT (intensity modulated radiation therapy). Clinical T stages were 12 (48%) for T1a, 5 (20%) for T1b and 8 (32%) for T2. Stage and anterior commissure involvement were analyzed as prognostic factors. Results: There were 12 (48%) patients with T1a, 5 (20%) patients with T1b and 8 (32%) patients with T2 cancer. 5 years of overall survival and diseases free survival for T1a, T1b, T2 were found to be 91%, 80%, 62% and 91%, 80%, 62% respectively. 5 year survival for patients without and with involvement of anterior commissure was 92% and 67% respectively. Hence, showing poor survival in patients with T2 lesion or T1 lesion with involvement of anterior commissure. Conclusion: In early-stage laryngeal carcinomas, radical RT is a function sparing and effective treatment modality with excellent survival rates, regardless of treatment techniques.

PO-2123 Deep Learning Prediction of 2-year Survival in Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Radiotherapy

PO-2123 Deep Learning Prediction of 2-year Survival in Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Radiotherapy

203 - A case study of an incidental finding of PJP on CBCT imaging in a stage III lung patient undergoing radical radiotherapy: a therapeutic radiographers experience

203 - A case study of an incidental finding of PJP on CBCT imaging in a stage III lung patient undergoing radical radiotherapy: a therapeutic radiographers experience

Nutritional Risk Screening And Clinical Significance In Patients With Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Radical Radiotherapy

Nutritional Risk Screening And Clinical Significance In Patients With Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Radical Radiotherapy

Patient engagement with radiation therapists: Patient perspectives, challenges, and opportunities. A systematic review

IntroductionRadiotherapy is a major component of cancer care and treatment is delivered almost exclusively by therapeutic radiographers/radiation therapists (RTTs). Numerous government and professional guidance publications have recommended a person-centred approach to healthcare through communication and collaboration between professionals, agencies, and users. With approximately half of patients undergoing radical radiotherapy experiencing some degree of anxiety and distress, RTTs are uniquely placed as frontline cancer professionals to engage with patients regarding their experience. This review seeks to map the available evidence of patient reported views of their experience of being treated by RTTs and any impact, this treatment had on the patient's frame of mind or perception of treatment. MethodsIn line with the principles of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) systematic review methodology, a review of relevant literature was conducted. Electronic databases MEDLINE, PROQUEST, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched. ResultsNine hundred and eighty-eight articles were identified. Twelve papers were included in the final review. ConclusionIncreased time with, and continuity of RTTs during treatment has a positive influence on patients’ perspectives of RTTs. A positive patient perspective of their engagement with RTTs can be a strong predictor of overall satisfaction in radiotherapy. Implications for practiceRTTs should not underestimate the impact of their supportive role in guiding patients through treatment. A standardised method for integrating patients’ experience and engagement with RTTs is lacking. Further RTT led research is required in this area.

The Impact of Interactive MRI-Based Radiologist Review on Radiotherapy Target Volume Delineation in Head and Neck Cancer.

Peer review of head and neck cancer radiation therapy target volumes by radiologists was introduced in our center to optimize target volume delineation. Our aim was to assess the impact of MR imaging-based radiologist peer review of head and neck radiation therapy gross tumor and nodal volumes, through qualitative and quantitative analysis. Cases undergoing radical radiation therapy with a coregistered MR imaging, between April 2019 and March 2020, were reviewed. The frequency and nature of volume changes were documented, with major changes classified as per the guidance of The Royal College of Radiologists. Volumetric alignment was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient, Jaccard index, and Hausdorff distance. Fifty cases were reviewed between April 2019 and March 2020. The median age was 59 years (range, 29-83 years), and 72% were men. Seventy-six percent of gross tumor volumes and 41.5% of gross nodal volumes were altered, with 54.8% of gross tumor volume and 66.6% of gross nodal volume alterations classified as "major." Undercontouring of soft-tissue involvement and unidentified lymph nodes were predominant reasons for change. Radiologist review significantly altered the size of both the gross tumor volume (P = .034) and clinical target tumor volume (P = .003), but not gross nodal volume or clinical target nodal volume. The median conformity and surface distance metrics were the following: gross tumor volume Dice similarity coefficient = 0.93 (range, 0.82-0.96), Jaccard index = 0.87 (range, 0.7-0.94), Hausdorff distance = 7.45 mm (range, 5.6-11.7 mm); and gross nodular tumor volume Dice similarity coefficient = 0.95 (0.91-0.97), Jaccard index = 0.91 (0.83-0.95), and Hausdorff distance = 20.7 mm (range, 12.6-41.6). Conformity improved on gross tumor volume-to-clinical target tumor volume expansion (Dice similarity coefficient = 0.93 versus 0.95, P = .003). MR imaging-based radiologist review resulted in major changes to most radiotherapy target volumes and significant changes in volume size of both gross tumor volume and clinical target tumor volume, suggesting that this is a fundamental step in the radiotherapy workflow of patients with head and neck cancer.

Patient Experience and Impact of Rectal Spacers on Dosimetry and Acute Toxicity in Patients Undergoing Radical Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

Patient Experience and Impact of Rectal Spacers on Dosimetry and Acute Toxicity in Patients Undergoing Radical Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

Assessing Symmetry and Accuracy of SpaceOAR Insertion Prior to Radical Radiotherapy to the Prostate: a Single UK Centre Experience

Purpose: SpaceOAR is an absorbable hydrogel inserted into the prerectal space of men undergoing radical radiotherapy to the prostate with the intention of reducing radiation-induced rectal toxicity. The benefit of SpaceOAR insertion in reducing rectal toxicity is related to the degree of prostate–rectum separation and symmetry of spacer placement [1,2]. Assessment of SpaceOAR insertion symmetry using a standardised scoring system can facilitate positional optimisation of future SpaceOAR insertion.

An autophagy-related gene prognostic index predicting biochemical recurrence, metastasis, and drug resistance for prostate cancer.

Given the dual role of autophagy presenting in tumorigenesis and inhibition, we established an autophagy-related gene prognostic index (ARGPI) with validation to well predict the biochemical recurrence (BCR), metastasis, as well as chemoresistance for patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent radical radiotherapy or prostatectomy. Then, Lasso and COX regression was used to develop the ARGPI. We performed the whole analyses through R packages (version 3.6.3). Secreted phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1), single-minded 2 (SIM2), serine protease inhibitor b5 (SERPINB5), aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2), and acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain 3 (ACSL3) were eventually used to establish the ARGPI score. Patients were divided into two different-risk groups based on the median ARGPI score, high-risk patients with a higher risk of BCR than low-risk patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 5.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.23-9.24). The risk of metastasis of high-risk patients was higher than low-risk patients (HR: 11.31, 95% CI: 4.89-26.12). In The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset, we observed similar prognostic value of ARGPI in terms of BCR-free survival (HR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.07-2.99) and metastasis-free survival (HR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.16-2.78). ARGPI score showed a diagnostic accuracy of 0.703 for drug resistance. Analysis of gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) indicated that patients in the high-risk group were significantly positively related to interleukin (IL)-18 signaling pathway. Moreover, ARGPI score was significantly related to cancer-related fibroblasts (CAFs; r = 0.36), macrophages (r = 0.28), stromal score (r = 0.38), immune score (r = 0.35), estimate score (r = 0.39), as well as tumor purity (r = -0.39; all P < 0.05). Drug analysis showed that PI-103 was the common sensitive drug and cell line analysis indicated that PC3 was the common cell line of PI-103 and the definitive gene. In conclusion, we found that ARGPI could predict BCR, metastasis, and chemoresistance in PCa patients who underwent radical radiotherapy or prostatectomy.