Underwent Radical Prostatectomy Research Articles

Evaluation of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Histopathology Specimen in Prostate Cancer.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown a great potential in the evaluation and management of prostate cancer. In this study, we would like to evaluate the benefit of multiparametric MRI in the detection and localization of prostate cancer by comparing it with the gold standard of histopathology from radical prostatectomy. In this single-centre prospective study, 90 consecutive patients underwent radical prostatectomy from November 2016 to May 2018. All patients first underwent multiparametric (mp)-MRI, and all suspicious regions of interest were delineated and recorded on a 5-point scale as defined in prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS V2) score. All radical prostatectomy specimens, acquired after robotic radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy, were sent for histopathological examination (HPE). The mean age of the 90 patients was 65.3years, and the mean serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 16.9ng/ml. The sensitivity and specificity of mp-MRI in the detection of the corresponding region of interest (ROI) on HPE were 67.4% and 89.3% respectively. Positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of mp-MRI in the detection of corresponding ROI on HPE were 86.3%, 73.3%, and 78.3% respectively. The mp-MRI detected 96.8% solitary lesions and 61.7% multifocal lesions on the corresponding ROI on HPE. Multiparametric MRI has an excellent specificity and reasonable sensitivity for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. It is a good modality for the detection of solitary tumours, higher-grade tumours, detection of seminal vesicle invasion and extracapsular extension and helps in the decision-making process before radical prostatectomy, focal therapy or selecting an appropriate candidate for active surveillance.

Impacts of radical prostatectomy with emphasis on physical and psycho-socio-emotional declines: An integrative review

Introduction: Prostatectomy oncological surgery is necessary for the continuity of life, but it has physical consequences (momentary inability to drive, erectile dysfunction), emotional (anxiety about the diagnosis and the consequences of treatment, depression) and psychosocial (feeling of impotence, failure, loss of status in society), which may or may not be transitory. Objective: to identify, through an integrative literature review, the biopsychosocial impacts of Radical Prostatectomy. Methodology: This is an integrative literature review, which included articles related to the proposed theme, published between the years 2012 to 2022, available in full, without language restriction; in addition to theses, dissertations and monographs. For this, the PRISMA guidelines were used, as well as the PICO strategy for the best delineation of the research question and research theme. Results and discussions: In view of the discussion, the study can respond to the objections raised by this research, and can show that the culture of masculinity, with regard to virility, strength, and better performance, composes risk factors for possible impacts on Quality of Life of men undergoing radical prostatectomy. These factors are intrinsically associated with the majority of relationships and characteristics represented by a man. Final considerations: Psychoeducation and general guidelines on sexual and mental health should be carried out to patients who undergo radical therapies, such as radical prostatectomy, so that these patients can achieve coping strategies that make them feel better, contributing directly to the best quality of life, functional capacity, and their social relationships.

A Neural Network Model Combining [-2]proPSA, freePSA, Total PSA, Cathepsin D, and Thrombospondin-1 Showed Increased Accuracy in the Identification of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer

The Prostate Health Index (PHI) and Proclarix (PCLX) have been proposed as blood-based tests for prostate cancer (PCa). In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of an artificial neural network (ANN)-based approach to develop a combinatorial model including PHI and PCLX biomarkers to recognize clinically significant PCa (csPCa) at initial diagnosis. To this aim, we prospectively enrolled 344 men from two different centres. All patients underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). All men had a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) between 2 and 10 ng/mL. We used an artificial neural network to develop models that can identify csPCa efficiently. As inputs, the model uses [-2]proPSA, freePSA, total PSA, cathepsin D, thrombospondin, and age. The output of the model is an estimate of the presence of a low or high Gleason score PCa defined at RP. After training on a dataset of up to 220 samples and optimization of the variables, the model achieved values as high as 78% for sensitivity and 62% for specificity for all-cancer detection compared with those of PHI and PCLX alone. For csPCa detection, the model showed 66% (95% CI 66-68%) for sensitivity and 68% (95% CI 66-68%) for specificity. These values were significantly different compared with those of PHI (p < 0.0001 and 0.0001, respectively) and PCLX (p = 0.0003 and 0.0006, respectively) alone. Our preliminary study suggests that combining PHI and PCLX biomarkers may help to estimate, with higher accuracy, the presence of csPCa at initial diagnosis, allowing a personalized treatment approach. Further studies training the model on larger datasets are strongly encouraged to support the efficiency of this approach.

Validation of baseline health-related quality of life as prognostic indicator for survival outcome in men with intermediate risk prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.

340 Background: Accurate prediction of cancer outcomes remains a key component of prostate cancer (PC) treatment decision-making. Intermediate-risk PC patients represent a heterogeneous group with highly variable prognoses and it is challenging to provide uniform treatment recommendations for those patients. Previous studies have shown baseline health-related quality of life (HRQOL) to be a robust prognostic indicator for survival outcomes of different cancer entities in the metastatic setting, with scarce evidence on PC. We therefore sought to validate the predictive value of baseline HRQOL for survival outcomes in men with intermediate risk PC undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods: We identified 4780 patients with intermediate risk PC according to NCCN risk stratification and prospectively assessed baseline HRQOL prior RP. Patients were stratified by global health status (GHS) domain of the QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Oncologic endpoints were metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox regression models were applied to assess the predictive value of baseline GHS on survival outcomes. Harrell's discrimination C-index was applied to calculate the predictive accuracy of the model. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to validate the clinical net benefit associated with adding GHS to our multivariable model ( P &lt; .05). Results: Median follow up was 51mo. In multivariable analysis, GHS was confirmed as an independent predictor for increased MFS (HR .98, 95% CI .97-.99; P = .028) and OS (HR .97, 95% CI .95-.99; P = .008), indicating a relative risk reduction of 1.7% for MFS and 2.8% for OS per 1-point increase of baseline GHS. Adding GHS to our model improved predictive accuracy of prognosis for MFS by 6% (c-index .75 vs .72) and for OS by 8% (c-index .78 vs .74). Validation with DCA revealed a net benefit over all thresholds in prediction of MFS and OS when adding GHS to our model. Conclusions: Our findings highlight that baseline HRQOL is a valuable and robust prognostic factor for patients with intermediate-risk PC prior RP. Baseline HRQOL data improve prognostic accuracy of MFS and OS and can therefore support treatment decision-making. [Table: see text]

Length and Gleason pattern at positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy to assess risk of postoperative recurrence in localized prostate cancer.

359 Background: The prostatic apex is most popular location of positive surgical margin (PSM) at radical prostatectomy (RP) and the frequency of apex is reported to be about 20-40% of all positive cases. Prostatic apex is also reported to lack a well-defined capsule. Some recommendation suggest that reporting require location of a PSM, as well as length of PSM, though there are also reports that these classifications is inadequate in some patients. In addition, there is a lack of tumor grade at PSM in these recommendations. This study aims to investigate the impact of location, number, length, and tumor grade at PSM on biochemical recurrence (BCR) after RP. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 1013 patients with prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy at the hospitals that the authors were affiliated with between 2005 and 2013. All prostatectomy specimen slides were reviewed by a single genitourinary pathologist according to ISUP 2019 criteria. PSM were subcategorized according to the length of PSM (≤ 5mm or &gt; 5mm), Gleason pattern (GP3 vs. GP4 or 5) at PSM, the number (single or multiple), and the location (apex-only or others). Results: The median patient age was 67 (range, 45–80) years. The median initial PSA was 6.8 ng/ml (0.4–82 ng/ml). The median follow-up period was 69 (0.7–135) months. Pathological T stage was in 73% of pT2 (n=733), 22% of pT3a (n=229), and 4% of pT3b (n=41). PSM was found in 377 cases. Length of margin is total and 5mm in median. PSM was found at apex-only in 187 cases (50%), and others showed other single location or multiple PSM. Single PSM is found in 293 cases (78%). GP3 at PSM was found in 130 cases, GP4 in 214, and GP5 in 33. GP3 at PSM tended to be more common in apex-only PSM. GP5, extra prostatic extension (EPE), seminal vesicle invasion, IDC-P, and PSM were significant in all the patients to predict BCR. Among the patients with PSM, multivariate analysis showed that length and GP at PSM were significantly strong factors and were stronger than location and number of PSM. The prognosis in pT2 patients with PSM were significantly subcategorized into 3 groups according to the length and GP at PSM (P&lt;0.001). Conclusions: We proposed the recurrence risk classification based on the length and the GP at PSM to predict BCR after radical prostatectomy. It is useful for prognosis prediction and high-risk group should be considered for adjuvant radiation and/or hormonal therapy in postoperative care.

Is transrectal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging better at estimating prostatic volume for patients with prostate cancer?

314 Background: Determining the correct size (volume) of the prostate is imperative for patients with prostate cancer. Prostate size can affect many parameters in patient care such as cores in a biopsy taken and available treatment options. Traditionally, most patients underwent transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) during prostate biopsy to estimate prostatic volume. While TRUS is still used to estimate prostate volume, more recently prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has also come into favor. Current literature indicates MRI is more accurate than TRUS for prostate size, but few studies exist, and whether differences in the two are clinically significant remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to compare prostate volumes from TRUS and MRI to gross specimens after prostatectomy. Methods: Patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer between 2017–2022 were identified. TRUS and MRI measurements closest to the date of surgery were obtained. These were compared to gross prostate specimens after surgery, which was considered the gold standard. All TRUS volumes were recorded by a urologist during prostate biopsy using the ellipsoid formula (L*W*H*(π/6)). MRI measurements were done by a radiologist also using the ellipsoid formula. The weight and dimensions of gross specimens were measured by a pathologist. Ellipsoid formula was then used to calculate final volume measurements in gross specimens. Paired samples t-test was used to compare averages of TRUS and MRI to the gross specimen. Results: 83 patients were included in the study with an average age at prostatectomy of 65.47 years. TRUS volume significantly differed from gross specimen volume by an average of –4.56 mL (p=0.017) and gross specimen weight by -14.31 g (p &lt;0.001). MRI volume was not significantly different from gross specimen volume, by an average of –0.56 mL (p=0.771) and was significantly different from prostate weight by –10.32 g (p &lt;0.001). When compared to one another, TRUS and MRI significantly differed on average by –4 mL (p=0.033). Conclusions: MRI is more accurate than TRUS to estimate prostate volume. Both MRI and TRUS underestimate prostate weight. Urologists should be aware of potential inaccuracies when assessing preoperative prostate volume with TRUS, and recognize MRI is the best predictor of size. While imperfect, TRUS is still relatively accurate measuring prostate volume, and given its ease of availability and cost, we feel it is a useful modality to determine prostate size. [Table: see text]

Correlation between ADC, ADC ratio, and Gleason Grade group in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: Retrospective multicenter study with different MRI scanners.

MRI is an important tool in the prostate cancer work-up, with special emphasis on the ADC sequence. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between ADC and ADC ratio compared to tumor aggressiveness determined by a histopathological examination after radical prostatectomy. Ninety-eight patients with prostate cancer underwent MRI at five different hospitals prior to radical prostatectomy. Images were retrospectively analyzed individually by two radiologists. The ADC of the index lesion and reference tissues (contralateral normal prostatic, normal peripheral zone, and urine) was recorded. Absolute ADC and different ADC ratios were compared to tumor aggressivity according to the ISUP Gleason Grade Groups extracted from the pathology report using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (ρ). ROC curves were used to evaluate the ability to discriminate between ISUP 1-2 and ISUP 3-5 and intra class correlation and Bland-Altman plots for interrater reliability. All patients had prostate cancer classified as ISUP grade ≥ 2. No correlation was found between ADC and ISUP grade. We found no benefit of using the ADC ratio over absolute ADC. The AUC for all metrics was close to 0.5, and no threshold could be extracted for prediction of tumor aggressivity. The interrater reliability was substantial to almost perfect for all variables analyzed. ADC and ADC ratio did not correlate with tumor aggressiveness defined by ISUP grade in this multicenter MRI study. The result of this study is opposite to previous research in the field.

A randomized phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemokine modulation in patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.

TPS406 Background: Most patients with high or very high risk localized prostate cancer (PCa) experience disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP). Neoadjuvant androgen ablation has not improved high-risk pathological features or recurrence rates after RP.1 We reported the association between high intratumoral CD8+ T lymphocyte (CTL) density and improved survival post-RP, suggesting clinical benefit from neoadjuvant immunomodulation (NI).2 Analysis of the tumor immune microenvironment after NI may also provide key insights into potential therapeutic strategies in PCa. CTL/NK/Th1-recruiting chemokines (CCL5, CXCL9 and CXCL10) are downregulated while MDSC/Treg-attracting chemokines (CCL2, CCL22, and CXCL12) are upregulated in human PCa tissue.3 A large proportion of T cells in PCa are Tregs or dysfunctional CTLs and this immunosuppressive profile may be partly driven by COX-2 upregulation.4,5 A chemokine modulating regimen (CKM) of rintatolimod (TLR-3 ligand), aspirin (COX-2 inhibitor), and IFN-α favorably reprogrammed the chemokine profile and CTL/Treg ratio in human PCa explants.3 This combination has demonstrated safety in phase I/II trials across other tumor types, though it is unclear if IFN-α can be omitted without compromising efficacy.7-8 Methods: This is a three-arm, phase II trial where patients with localized PCa scheduled to undergo RP are randomized in 1:1:1 ratio to a 2-week regimen of neoadjuvant CKM triplet (rintatolimod + aspirin + IFN-α) vs CKM doublet (rintatolimod + aspirin) vs no CKM. Thirty patients will be enrolled to assess CD8+ T cell density in the RP specimen as the primary endpoint. Pathological and PSA responses, surgical margin positivity, and safety/toxicity of the CKM combinations will be secondary endpoints. Pre- and post-treatment density of various infiltrating T cell subtypes, MDSCs, chemokine and chemokine receptor profiles, immune checkpoint expression, immune-regulatory gene expression signatures, and peripheral blood immune cell landscape will be key exploratory endpoints. The trial is currently open with 11 patients enrolled. Clinical trial ID: NCT03899987 .

Radical Prostatectomy without Prior Biopsy in Patients with High Suspicion of Prostate Cancer Based on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography: A Prospective Cohort Study

Modern risk stratification of prostate cancer (PCa) allows for prediction of advanced disease with a high level of certainty. We aimed to evaluate a prospective series of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy without prior biopsy based solely on clinical criteria and imaging results. The patients were divided into three groups. Group 1 included 27 patients with: (i) suspicious digital rectal examination, (ii) PSA ≥ 10 ng/mL, (iii) PI-RADS 4/5 on mpMRI, and (iv) high suspicion of PCa on PSMA-PET. Group 2 included six patients who fulfilled criteria i, ii, and iii but did not undergo PSMA-PET imaging. Group 3 included 17 patients with at least one clinical (i or ii) and one imaging (iii or iv) criterion. All of the patients were diagnosed with PCa. Comparison of Group 1 and 2 versus Group 3 showed a significantly higher ratio of locally advanced PCa for Groups 1 and 2 compared to Group 3 (60.6% versus 11.8%, p = 0.005, respectively). Similarly, these patients displayed a significantly higher ratio of aggressive PCa (ISUP grade > 2: 66.7% versus 23.5%, p = 0.027, respectively) and tumor infiltration (median tumor infiltration: 32.5% vs. 15%, p = 0.001, respectively) in the final specimen compared to Group 3. In conclusion, we have shown that radical prostatectomy without prior biopsy is safe in terms of the diagnosis of clinically significant PCa when proper preoperative risk stratification involving mpMRI and PSMA-PET imaging is applied.

Risk factors for lymphorrhea and lymphocele after radical prostatectomy: a retrospective case-control study.

To investigate the risk factors for postoperative lymphorrhea or/and lymphocele (PLL) in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). The clinical data of 606 patients were retrospectively collected. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was utilized to identify the optimal cutoff value. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to screen the independent predictors of PLL. Univariate analysis showed that nine factors differed between the PLL and non-PLL group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that low preoperative fibrinogen level, extraperitoneal surgery, robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP), and hypoalbuminemia were risk factors and the use of fibrin glue was a protective factor. Correlation analysis showed that the scope of LN dissection (LND) and number of lymph nodes (LNs) dissected were positively correlated with PLL in the extraperitoneal approach, but were not significantly correlated with PLL in the transperitoneal approach. The use of fibrin glue was negatively associated with PLL in the overall procedure and the extraperitoneal approach, but not significantly so in the transperitoneal approach. Comparison of LNs clearance between the two surgical approaches revealed that the extent of LND and number of LNs dissected in the extraperitoneal approach were less than in the transperitoneal approach. During RALRP, more attention should be paid to fully clotting the broken end of lymphatic vessels. The use of fibrin glue could reduce the probability of PLL. The extent of LND or number of LNs dissected were positively correlated with PLL in the extraperitoneal approach.

Comparison of oncological and functional outcomes of perineoscopic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

The aim of this study is to compare the functional, oncological, and complication outcomes of perineoscopic radical prostatectomy (PeRP) and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) operations. Patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) between October 2018 and June 2020 for localized prostate cancer (N0, < T3) were retrospectively screened. After the exclusion criteria, 56 patients who underwent PeRP and 67 patients who underwent RARP remained in the study. Demographic, perioperative, and postoperative data were collected. In functional outcomes, continence and potency status were compared at 1, 3, 6, and 12months. The mean age of the patients was 61.3 ± 5.9years in the PeRP group and 62.2 ± 5.7years in the RARP group. No statistically significant differences were present between preoperative and postoperative values. Among the perioperative findings, the mean operation time was 90.4 ± 11.2min for the PeRP group and 114.6 ± 14.7min for the RARP group. The operation time was shorter in the PeRP group. The average hospital stay was 2 ± 0.6days in the PeRP group and 2.3 ± 0.5days in the RARP group. It was significantly shorter in the PeRP group. There is no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the oncological and functional results. PeRP is a surgical procedure safe in low-risk patients with medium-risk prostate cancer (PCa) who do not require lymph-node dissection. Moreover, PeRP minimizes the difficulties of perineal surgery.

Riluzole, a neuroprotective agent, preserves erectile function following bilateral cavernous nerve injury in male rats.

Neurogenic erectile dysfunction is a highly prevalent complication in men undergoing radical prostatectomy. The underlying mechanisms remain incompletely defined and the effective therapy has been limited. This study aimed to evaluate the protective effect of riluzole and the role of PKC β and excitatory amino acid transporters (EAATs) mediating this effect in a rat model of bilateral cavernous injury (BCNI). A total of 48 male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into sham, BCNI (at 7, 15 days post-injury) and BCNI treated with riluzole (8 mg/kg/day) groups. Erectile function was measured as maximum intracavernosal pressure (mICP)/mean arterial pressure (MAP) and total ICP/MAP. Changes in protein expressions of phospho (p)-PKC β IIser660 and EAATs were analysed in penis and major pelvic ganglion with western blotting. BCNI decreased erectile function at 7 and 15 days post-injury (mICP/MAP at 4 V: 0.45 ± 0.06 vs 0.84 ± 0.07; 0.34 ± 0.04 vs 0.77 ± 0.04 respectively; p < 0.001) whereas riluzole treatment (for 15 days) preserved erectile function (mICP/MAP at 4 V: 0.62 ± 0.03 vs 0.34 ± 0.04; p < 0.01). The decline in the expression of p-PKC β IIser660 was observed in penis at 7 and 15 days post-injury (p = 0.0003, p = 0.0033), which was prevented by riluzole treatment for 15 days (p = 0.0464). While expressions of EAAT-1 and EAAT-2 decreased in major pelvic ganglion following BCNI (p = 0.0428, p = 0.002), riluzole treatment for 15 days prevented the decrease only in EAAT-2 expression (p = 0.0456). Riluzole improved erectile function via possibly interacting with PKC β II and glutamatergic pathways, as a potential therapeutic candidate for erectile dysfunction.

Predictor Factors for the Detection of Positive Nodes in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy and Lymph Node Dissection

Background: The detection of positive lymph nodes after a lymph node dissection changes the clinical prognosis; therefore, we evaluated what factors help us predict the presence of positive lymph nodes. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all radical prostatectomies and extended lymph node dissection performed from January 2010 to October 2018 in our centre was conducted. The variables included in the Briganti nomogram (preoperative PSA, Gleason biopsy, percentage of cores, and clinical stage) were considered, as well as perineural invasion and involvement of the seminal vesicles in the prostate biopsy; Results: A total of 110 lymph node dissections are obtained. Patient mean age is 64.18 years (46.55–75.91). Of the 110 lymphadenectomies performed, 16 patients (14.5%) presented positive nodes. Presenting infiltrated seminal vesicles, perineural invasion, higher PSA, higher clinical stage, higher Gleason biopsy and percentage of cores is more likely to have statistically significant lymph node involvement (p &lt; 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, the percentage of positive core, together with the involvement of the seminal vesicles and Gleason ≥ 4 in the majority are predictor factors for positive nodes (p &lt; 0.01); Conclusions: The percentage of positive cores, the involvement of the seminal vesicles, and the majority Gleason ≥ 4 are independent predictors of lymph node involvement in prostate cancer.

Detection of intraductal carcinoma in prostate cancer patients with small tumor volume.

The purpose of this study was to investigate intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (intraductal carcinoma) and significant cancer (SC) in patients with small tumor volume (<0.5 cm3 ) in prostatectomy specimens. Data from 639 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy between April 2006 and December 2017 at Chiba University Hospital and 2 affiliated institutions were retrospectively reviewed. Tumor volume in prostatectomy specimens was measured, and with a tumor volume of less than 0.5 cm3 , the presence of intraductal carcinoma and SC was examined. SC was defined as one that did not meet the definition of pathological insignificant cancer (organ-confined cancer, Grade Group 1, tumor volume < 0.5 cm3 ). The number of patients who met four active surveillance (AS) protocols was also examined. A total of 83 patients with tumor volume < 0.5 cm3 were identified in this study population (SC: 43 patients [52%], intraductal carcinoma: 5 patients [6%]). The median follow-up was 34.6 months (range: 18-57 months). Four (5%) developed biochemical recurrence. The number of positive biopsy cores ≥ 2 was an independent predictor of SC in patients with tumor volume < 0.5 cm3 (hazard ratio: 4.39; 95% confidence interval: 1.67-11.56; p = 0.003). In tumor volume < 0.5 cm3 , tumor volume was significantly correlated with the International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group (1 vs. 4-5, p = 0.002) and the presence of intraductal carcinoma (p = 0.004). In intraductal carcinoma-positive cases, four of five patients (80%) had the predictor of SC, which was two or more positive biopsy cores. Of the four AS protocols, the criteria for Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance were met most frequently in 46 cases (55%) of tumor volume less than 0.5 cm3 if targeted biopsy by magnetic resonance imaging was available. The results of the present study suggest that intraductal carcinoma was present even in cases with small tumor volumes. Grade Group and intraductal carcinoma showed a positive correlation with tumor volume.

Prevalence of tumour-infiltrating CD103+ cells identifies therapeutic-sensitive prostate cancer with poor clinical outcome.

The clinical significance and immune correlation of CD103+ cells in prostate cancer (PCa) remain explored. In total, 1080 patients with PCa underwent radical prostatectomy from three cohorts were enrolled for retrospective analysis. Tumour microarrays were constructed and fresh tumour samples were analysed by flow cytometry. High CD103+ cell infiltration correlated with reduced biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival in PCa. Adjuvant hormone therapy (HT) prolonged the BCR-free survival for high-risk node-negative diseases with CD103+ cell abundance. CD103+ cell infiltration correlated with less cytotoxic expression and increased infiltration of CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, M1 macrophages and mast cells in PCa. Intratumoral CD8+ T cell was the predominant source of CD103, and the CD103+ subset of CD8+ T cells was featured with high IL-10, PD-1 and CTLA-4 expression. Tumour-infiltrating CD103+ CD8+ T cells exerted anti-tumour function when treated with HT ex vivo. CD103+ cell infiltration predicted BCR-free survival and response to adjuvant HT in PCa. CD103+ cell infiltration correlated with an enriched but immune-evasive immune landscape. The study supported a model that CD103 expression conferred negative prognostic impact and immunosuppressive function to tumour-infiltrating CD8+ T cells, while the CD103+ CD8+ T cells exhibited a powerful anti-tumour immunity with response to HT.

Is There an Impact of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging–targeted Biopsy on the Risk of Upgrading in Final Pathology in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy? An European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group Multi-institutional Study

BackgroundThe concordance rates of transperineal (TP) versus transrectal (TR) prostate biopsies with radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen have been assessed poorly in men diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy (TBx). ObjectiveTo evaluate International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) concordance rates between the final pathology at RP and MRI-TBx or MRI-TBx + random biopsy (RB) according to the biopsy approach. Design, setting, and participantsA multi-institutional database included patients diagnosed with TP or TR treated with RP. InterventionTP-TBx or TR-TBx of the prostate. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisThe ISUP grade at biopsy was compared with the final pathology. A multivariable logistic regression analysis (MVA) was performed to assess the association between the biopsy approach (TP-TBx vs TR-TBx) and ISUP upgrading, downgrading, concordance, and clinically relevant increase (CRI). Results and limitationsOverall, 752 (59%) versus 530 (41%) patients underwent TR versus TP. At the MVA, TP-TBx was an independent predictor of upgrading (odds ratio [OR] 0.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4–0.9, p < 0.01) and improved concordance relative to the final pathology (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2–2.5, p < 0.01) after adjusting for age, cT stage, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, number of targeted cores, prostate-specific antigen, and prostate volume. Moreover, TP-TBx was associated with a lower risk of CRI than TR-TBx (OR 0.7, p < 0.01). This held true when considering patients who underwent MRI-TBx + RB (OR 0.6, p < 0.01). The inclusion of men who had RP represents a potential selection bias. ConclusionsThe adoption of TP-TBx compared with TR-TBx may reduce the risk of upgrading and improve the concordance of biopsy grade with the final pathology. The TP approach decreases the odds of CRI with improved patient selection for the correct active treatment. Patient summaryIn this report, we evaluated whether transperineal (TP) targeted biopsy (TBx) may improve the concordance of clinically significant prostate cancer with the final pathology in comparison with transrectal (TR) TBx in a large worldwide population. We found that TP-TBx might increase concordance compared with TR-TBx. Adding random biopsies to target one increases accuracy; however, concordance with the final pathology is overall suboptimal even with the TP approach.

SEPERA – a novel artificial intelligence-based side-specific extra-prostatic extension risk assessment tool for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy

SEPERA – a novel artificial intelligence-based side-specific extra-prostatic extension risk assessment tool for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy

Changing nationwide trend away from overtreatment among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy over the past 25 years in Germany

Changing nationwide trend away from overtreatment among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy over the past 25 years in Germany

Is there an impact of transperineal vs. transrectal MRI-targeted biopsy on the risk of upgrading and concordance with final pathology in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy? An EAU-YAU study

Is there an impact of transperineal vs. transrectal MRI-targeted biopsy on the risk of upgrading and concordance with final pathology in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy? An EAU-YAU study

Does lymph node dissection improve the prognosis of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy? Results of the MICAN study

Does lymph node dissection improve the prognosis of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy? Results of the MICAN study