Underwent Breast Augmentation Research Articles

A new type of dual-plane breast augmentation: Redefining parenchyma-muscle interface in high mobile glandular ptotic breast

BackgroundHigh mobile glandular ptotic breasts present the greatest challenge for implant breast augmentation with suboptimal outcomes occurring frequently. Here, we describe and evaluate an innovative approach for breast augmentation in this breast type. By widely disrupting and redefining the parenchyma-muscle interface, this technique offers opportunities to restore the takeoff point of the breast and improve the fullness of the upper pole, thus producing a “perkier” breast appearance. MethodsA retrospective review was performed, and 68 patients who underwent breast augmentation with either type III dual-plane or the new approach between January 2015 and January 2021 were included. The patients were divided into two groups. The aesthetic outcome and patient satisfaction were evaluated using different 10-point rating forms. Data on demographic information, surgical details, and relative complication rates were recorded and compared. ResultsUpon comparing the aesthetic outcomes and satisfaction, the test group demonstrated better breast shape, nipple-areola position, upper pole contour outcome, and upper pole satisfaction. No post-operative hematoma, seroma, or infection occurred in either groups. No double-bubble deformity occurred in the test group, whereas it occurred in two patients in the control group. The rates of capsular contracture were 1.4% and 1.6%, in the test and control groups, respectively. ConclusionsThe new approach is a safe surgical method with good aesthetic outcome, high patient satisfaction, and long-lasting result. This approach is a supplement to the dual-plane techniques, to realize the benefits of mastopexy and type III dual-plane breast augmentation.

Abstract PO2-20-12: Breast Implant-associated Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Abstract A 54-year-old female with a history of bilateral breast implants presented with intermittent left breast pain for 6 months. She first had bilateral breast implants placed in 1996 and had no reported issues until 2010, when she had bacteremia and seeding infection with subsequent removal of both implants. She then had a second set of silicone-based implants placed in 2012 with no issues for 10 years. Family history was negative for breast cancer or any other malignancy. She had no prior smoking history. Vital signs and laboratory values were unremarkable. On exam, the left breast appeared larger than the right, dense, thickened, and slightly edematous. No lymphadenopathy was palpated. Both mammogram and ultrasound of bilateral breasts, done at the onset of her pain, were normal. Given the patient’s symptoms, an MRI of the breasts was done, with findings concerning an infection or lymphoma. It revealed an irregular fluid collection in the left breast. The fluid collection was rim-enhancing with frond-like areas of enhancing tissue, extending through the inferior aspect of the capsule into the subcutaneous tissue of the lower outer quadrant of the left breast. Enhancement and edema extended off of the superior and posterior aspect of the prosthesis into the pectoralis muscle. It was particularly prominent along the medial aspect of the prosthesis where it extended in the chest wall between the sternum and the costal cartilage. There were 3 mildly enlarged left intramammary lymph nodes measuring up to 7 mm in short axis, with diffuse edema seen within the breast. No axillary adenopathy was seen in the MRI. She was referred to surgery and had both right and left breast implants removed, and a left breast JP drain was placed. The pathology from the left breast capsule excision revealed squamous cell carcinoma, well-differentiated and invasive, associated with a scar and extending to the surgical margin. She was diagnosed with a rare case of breast implant-associated squamous cell carcinoma (BIA-SCC). Subsequent staging imaging showed postsurgical inflammatory changes with no nodal metastatic disease. She continued to follow up outpatient with plans of multidisciplinary meeting to discuss long-term treatment options. Most patients undergoing breast augmentation experience no serious complications. Previously, rare incidences of breast-implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) had been reported, with 1234 cases as of 2022. More recently, cases of BIA-SCC have been seen. Primary SCC of the breast is extremely rare in both augmented and non-augmented women. 19 cases of BIA-SCC are reported in the literature as of 2022, all seen in females, typically arising from capsular tissue around the breast implant. It is a rare and potentially aggressive malignancy, with unclear etiology and undefined therapy regimen due to a paucity of data. Suggested treatments include resection with a negative margin, although this could require an extensive and complex reconstruction, including plastic surgery soft tissue coverage of the resection defect. Definitive radiation to obtain local control can be considered in an organ-sparing approach. Consideration can also be given to either chemosensitization with agents such as cisplatin or combining radiation with immunotherapy. Citation Format: Farhan Azad, Ajay Siva, Prutha Patel, Clive Miranda, Matthew Gravina. Breast Implant-associated Squamous Cell Carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-20-12.

Patient Satisfaction Using BREAST-Q and Breast Implant Illness after Breast Reconstruction in Transwomen.

Gender-affirming breast augmentation comprises an increasing portion of breast augmentations performed by plastic surgeons. Satisfaction and breast implant illness (BII) symptoms in this population have not been well studied. This study aimed to evaluate satisfaction and BII symptoms in transwomen who received nontextured implants as part of their breast reconstruction. We conducted a retrospective review of transwomen who underwent breast augmentation for gender-affirming surgery. We performed telephone survey evaluation using the BREAST-Q questionnaire preoperatively, 6 months and 1 year after breast implant placement. Survey evaluation asking about BII symptoms was also administered at the same time points. Twenty-six patients completed the BREAST-Q survey, which demonstrated significantly improved satisfaction postoperatively at 6 and 12 months when compared with median preoperative scores for psychosocial (P < 0.001; P < 0.001), sexual (P < 0.001; P < 0.001), and overall satisfaction with breasts (P < 0.001; P < 0.001). Physical well-being of the chest decreased at 6 months (P < 0.001) but improved in comparison with 12 months (P < 0.001). Thirty-four patients completed the BII survey, with 18% reporting symptoms at 3 months and 29% at 1 year. Zero patients requested explantation. Transwomen exhibit a significant increase in breast, psychosocial, and sexual well-being after breast augmentation. However, patients experienced a decreased physical well-being, and many report symptoms associated with BII. These results can be used to better counsel these individuals preoperatively and set reasonable postoperative expectations. Further studies investigating long-term satisfaction in larger cohorts are needed.

Aesthetic Potential and Safety Profile with Nanotextured Breast Implants With 1,000 Cases of Breast Augmentation as Evaluation of Single-Center Experience.

Nanotextured implants, an innovation in implant technology, are designed to enhance tissue interaction, reduce inflammation, and mitigate complications compared to traditional implants. The aim of the study was to evaluate the aesthetic potential and safety profile of nanotextured breast implants in breast augmentation from a single-surgeon experience. This prospective cohort study included 1,000 patients who underwent breast augmentation with nanotextured implants. Aesthetic outcomes were assessed using direct measurements and BCCT.core software, focusing on breast projection, symmetry, and upper pole fullness. Patient satisfaction was measured through BREAST-Q and overall satisfaction surveys. Safety profiles were evaluated based on the incidence of complications such as infection, hematoma, capsular contracture, and implant rupture. Statistical analyses were conducted to assess the outcomes. The study found significant improvements in aesthetic outcomes, with 92.8% of cases achieving substantial aesthetic enhancements. Patient satisfaction was high, with 96.4% reporting enhanced self-esteem and contentment. The safety profile was favorable, with a low incidence of complications (0.7% requiring revision surgery) and no major complications reported. Long-term follow-up data indicated sustained aesthetic outcomes and a stable safety profile. Insights into the synergistic relationship between nanotextured implants are defined by a significantly wider range of aesthetic options. The findings of this study underscore the positive impact of nanotextured breast implants on enhancing the aesthetic potential of breast augmentation. and contributing to a low incidence of complications.

Rib Reduction Technique in Patients with Isolated Chondrocostal Chest Wall Prominence Undergoing Breast Augmentation.

When planning for breast augmentation, it is important to consider not only implant choice, surgical technique and patient desires, but also the chest wall shape and deformities or irregularities, which remain often underestimated. They can be responsible for implant malposition and breast asymmetry after augmentation. Chondrocostal junction prominence is a minor but frequent chest wall deformity. The aim of this study is to report a new technique for sculpturing isolated chondrocostal prominence deformities in patients undergoing breast augmentation. A retrospective study was conducted to review surgical outcomes of a novel technique for costal prominence sculpturing and reshaping in patients undergoing breast augmentation. After reaching the subpectoral space, an inferiorly-based perichondral-periosteal flap is harvested just above the prominence. Once the deformity is corrected, the perichondral flap is repositioned over the sculpted rib. A total of six patients presenting with isolated chondrocostal prominence underwent bilateral breast implant placement and costal reduction using the described technique. Three patients were primary augmentations while the remaining patients were two secondary breast augmentation and one augmentation mastopexy. No complications were reported. No additional pain was referred at the side of rib remodelling in comparison with the contralateral breast. All the patients were satisfied with cosmetic results. The described technique for contouring of isolated chondrocostal deformities is fast, easy reproducible and offers advantages over the standard partial rib reduction technique. It can prevent implant malposition and projection asymmetry, eventually enhancing breast augmentation outcomes. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Twelve Years and over 2400 Implants Later: Augmentation Mammoplasty Risk Factors Based on a Single Plastic Surgeon’s Experience

Background: Breast augmentation is one of the most commonly performed aesthetic surgery procedures. Yet, few reports in the literature analyze individual surgeon experiences with a unified surgical method on a large group of patients. This study aimed to analyze a single surgeon’s complications rate and experience with the Akademikliniken augmentation mammaplasty method from the beginning of his career. Methods: A retrospective outcome analysis of all patients (n = 1646) who underwent breast augmentation between 2009 and 2021 performed by a single surgeon was conducted. Complications and reoperation rates were evaluated. In addition, correlations with the patient and implant characteristics and insertion-method–related risk factors were analyzed. Results: In total, 1212 female patients (mean age, 31.47 years) were analyzed. The minimal follow-up for every patient was 6 months (mean follow-up, 18.35 months). The total complication rate was 7.1%, and the most common complication (2.64%) was capsular contracture (Baker scale III/IV). Implant insertion with a funnel significantly lowered the overall risk of complications (P = 0.009). Statistical analysis indicates that the single independent risk factors for primary breast augmentation are patient age younger than 27 years, initial breast size B and C, and tobacco smoking. Conclusions: This study indicated that capsular contracture and implant rotation are the most common complications of analyzed primary augmentation mammoplasty. It also identifies various risk and protection factors, such as funnel usage, which should be considered by the surgeon when performing this type of procedure.

Achieving Harmonious Feminine Proportions: A Comprehensive Study on Breast Harmonization with Nanotextured Implants.

The prevalence of breast augmentation as a strategy for achieving idealized feminine proportions, consistent with contemporary beauty standards, has increased notably. This study focuses on the use of nanotextured implants, examining their efficacy in enhancing body symmetry and conforming to current aesthetic ideals. Conducted as a prospective cohort study, this research included women who underwent breast augmentation using nanotextured ergonomic implants from 2017 to 2023. A personalized methodology was applied, incorporating an array of anthropometric measurements and individual motivations to inform the selection of implants. The techniques used aimed at fostering a natural aesthetic, coupled with an extensive postoperative follow-up to evaluate outcomes and identify any complications. The study involved 1000 participants, with findings indicating a marked improvement in breast and overall body proportions, in line with targeted aesthetic principles. High levels of patient satisfaction were observed, with more than 90% reporting favorable aesthetic results and a low incidence of complications. These findings emphasize the effectiveness and safety of nanotextured implants in achieving the desired aesthetic goals. The study underscores the efficacy of nanotextured implants in attaining balanced feminine proportions, aligning surgical results with modern beauty ideals and enhancing personal well-being. It highlights the significance of a tailored approach in breast augmentation, which encompasses not only the physical aspects of aesthetic enhancement but also the psychological and social facets of patient contentment.

Long-Term Satisfaction with Breast Augmentation and Augmentation Mastopexy in the Latin American Population.

The primary objective of this study was to determine the long-term satisfaction levels of women who have undergone breast augmentation and augmentation mastopexy procedures, while identifying the factors influencing patient satisfaction. A self-reported retrospective case study design was used to collect data from women with breast implants. The study employed a survey that included demographic information, preoperative diagnosis, implant details, and patient-reported outcomes measured using the Breast-Q Instrument, which evaluates satisfaction with breasts, self-esteem, sexual well-being, and physical symptoms. Statistical analyses were conducted to identify correlations and differences in outcomes between the different variables. The survey was completed by 1022 women from 19 countries, with Chile, Mexico, and Colombia being the most represented. Augmentation was performed on 72.2% of the patients, while 27.7% underwent augmentation mastopexy. Patient satisfaction with breast size and shape varied significantly between the two procedures, with patients undergoing augmentation mastopexy showing less satisfaction. In addition, patients who were unaware of their implant shape or placement reported lower satisfaction scores. The study also found that patient satisfaction decreased over time in the augmentation mastopexy cases and that patients with high body mass index had lower satisfaction. Augmentation mastopexy in patients with breast ptosis yields lower satisfaction than augmentation alone. Dissatisfaction escalates with overweight/obesity (BMI), post-surgery time, and misinformation. Implant pocket (pre-vs. subpectoral), shape (round vs. anatomical), and size did not impact satisfaction. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Addition of progesterone to feminizing gender-affirming hormone therapy in transgender individuals for breast development: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundFeminizing gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) for transgender individuals traditionally includes estradiol and androgen deprivation. Research has demonstrated that breast size as a result of GAHT in transgender women is often limited. Therefore, transgender women often choose to undergo breast augmentation surgery. Progesterone is important for breast development in cisgender women during puberty. A potential role for progesterone in breast development in transgender women has not been investigated in a randomized controlled experimental set-up. The primary objective of this study is to explore the effects on breast volume of addition of oral progesterone to GAHT with estradiol in transgender women after vaginoplasty or orchiectomy. Secondary objectives include assessment of safety, satisfaction, mood, sleep and sexual pleasure.MethodsThis is a non-blinded, non-placebo, randomized controlled trial using a factorial design in adult transgender individuals assigned male sex at birth who have undergone GAHT for at least one year and underwent vaginoplasty or orchiectomy. The study design allows for rapid assessment of potential synergistic effects of various dose combinations of estradiol and progesterone on breast volume change: Ninety participants will be randomized into six groups of 15 subjects each, receiving either the baseline dose of estradiol, the baseline dose of estradiol and progesterone 200 mg daily, the baseline dose of estradiol and progesterone 400 mg daily, twice the baseline dose of estradiol, twice the baseline dose of estradiol and progesterone 200 mg daily or twice the baseline dose of estradiol and progesterone 400 mg daily, all for a duration of 12 months. The main study parameters include changes in breast volume as determined by 3D measurements. Participants will be followed-up with laboratory testing including serum progesterone concentrations as well as surveys for satisfaction, mood, sleep quality and sexual pleasure.DiscussionThis study will indicate whether progesterone is safe and of additional value with regard to breast volume change in transgender individuals receiving feminizing GAHT. The results of this study will be useful for innovation of feminizing GAHT.Trial registrationWHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform: EUCTR2020-001952-16-NL; date of registration: 12 December 2020 https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=EUCTR2020-001952-16-NL.

Cosmetic Breast Augmentation with Autologous Ex Vivo-Expanded Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cell (Stemform®)-Enriched Fat Grafts: A Study of the First Twenty-Two Real-World Patients

BackgroundFat grafting is commonly utilized in breast surgery, and since it was first described, clinicians and researchers have stridden towards improvement of graft retention. Current advancements include adding adipose-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSC(AT)s), which have demonstrated promise for improved graft retention.ObjectivesThis study reports outcomes for the first twenty-two patients undergoing breast augmentation (Stemform BA) or artificial implant replacement (Stemform AIR) with MSC(AT)-enriched fat in a real-world setting.MethodsAutologous MSC(AT)s were isolated and expanded ex vivo, then mixed with lipoaspirate and injected as enriched fat for Stemform BA and AIR. The breast volume was measured preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postoperative using a 3D Infinity Dual-Lens Camera and LifeVizApp software. Additionally, independent plastic surgeons evaluated clinical images, and patient satisfaction was obtained at equal time points.ResultsTwenty-two patients were included. All completed 3 and 12 months clinical follow-up and 3 months volume measurements. Nineteen patients completed 12 months volume measurements. The median fat graft retention at 12 months was 95.7% (IQR = 82.44–103.12%) for Stemform BA patients and 113.0% (IQR = 94.8–131.2%) for Stemform AIR patients. The Stemform BA patients had a median breast enlargement of 172.0% (IQR = 156.7–241.0%). The implant replacement volume of Stemform AIR patients was 102% (IQR = 85.1–130.3%). The patient reported 92.8% and 100% would elect to repeat treatment if they had the opportunity for Stemform BA and Stemform AIR, respectively.ConclusionBreast augmentation and breast implant replacement patients receiving ex vivo-expanded MSC(AT)-enriched fat grafts had high graft retention and patient satisfaction scores. The paper confirms the clinical efficacy of using ex vivo-expanded MSC(AT)s.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Outcome analysis and assessment of the lower pole expansion following breast augmentation with ergonomic implants: Optimizing results with patient selection based on 5-year data

Silicone implants have gone through adaptations to improve esthetic outcomes. With the progress of technology, including gel rheology, different properties have been introduced. Ergonomic style implants (ESI) feature enhanced rheological properties and provide a shaped contour with a round base. This study investigated outcomes for ESI in breast augmentation concerning lower pole stretching (LPS) and implant stability and describes an algorithm to assist in decision-making. A total of 148 patients (296 breasts) underwent breast augmentation with ESI; this procedure was indicated in patients with good skin quality and <6cm between the nipple-areola complex and the inframammary fold. The mean patient age was 29.6 years (range: 19-39), and 93 patients (62.8%) underwent primary breast augmentation with demi/full projection (average volume of 245 cc [175-375 cc]). Axillary incision and subfascial pocket were indicated in 115 (77.7%) and 72 (48%) cases, respectively. Average LPS values were 32.2% (24.91mm) and 10.86% (9.42mm) at up to 10 days and 10 days to 12 months postprocedure, respectively. Patients were followed for a mean of 29.9±26.4 months (range: 6-66). Complication rates per breast and per patient were 5% and 10%, respectively, and included subcutaneous banding in the axilla (1.6%), implant displacement (1.2%), and wound dehiscence (0.8%). No cases of infection, seroma, or rippling complications were observed. The present decision-making algorithm summarizes the process involved in breast augmentation using ESI and is intended to help standardize decisions. With correct planning, long-lasting outcomes can be achieved due to favorable interactions between ESI and the patient's tissues.

Using Machine Learning to Select Breast Implant Volume.

In breast augmentation surgery, the selection of the appropriate breast implant size is a crucial step that can greatly impact patient satisfaction and the outcome of the procedure. However, this decision is often based on the subjective judgment of the surgeon and the patient, which can lead to suboptimal results. In this study, we aimed to develop a machine-learning approach that can accurately predict the size of breast implants selected for breast augmentation surgery. We collected data on patient demographics, medical history, and surgeon preferences from a sample of 1000 consecutive patients who underwent breast augmentation. This information was used to train and test a supervised machine learning model to predict the size of breast implants. Our study demonstrated the effectiveness of the algorithm in predicting breast implant size, achieving a Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.9335 (p <0.001). The model generated accurate predictions in 86% of the instances, with a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 27.10 ml. Its effectiveness was confirmed in the reoperation group, in which 36 of 57 (63%) patients would have received a more suitable implant size if the model's suggestion were followed, potentially avoiding reoperation. Our findings show that machine learning can accurately predict the chosen size of breast implants in augmentation surgery. By integrating our AI model into a decision support system for breast augmentation surgery, essential guidance can be provided to both the surgeons and patients. This not only streamlines the implant selection process but also facilitates enhanced communication and decision-making, ultimately leading to more reliable outcomes and improved patient satisfaction.

Combined Multidisciplinary Gender-Affirming Surgery During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Model to Optimize Access to Care, Resource Utilization andMedical Readiness forMilitary Patients.

Access to surgical care for gender-affirming surgery (GAS) has been a persistent challenge within the DoD due to long waiting lists, strict insurance requirements, and surgeon/subspecialty scarcity. These issues were magnified during the COVID-19 pandemic response, as limited resources led to postponement of "elective" surgeries. To remedy this, our center organized a multidisciplinary collaboration to perform simultaneous GAS. This model is necessary to optimize the quality-of-life and medical readiness for a particularly marginalized population within the U.S. Military who now constitute roughly 1% of all active duty personnel. In addition, one-stage surgery provides a feasible solution to streamlining care and decreasing DoD personnel health care costs. We present a case describing successful multidisciplinary surgical management of a transgender woman desiring multiple GASs. We include a comparative, cost-benefit analysis to emphasize the advantages of single-stage over multistage surgeries. Our patient is a 24-year-old active duty transgender female who underwent breast augmentation and fat harvesting with plastic surgery, which was immediately followed by simultaneous simple orchiectomy by urology and facial feminizing surgery with otolaryngology. Total operative time was 8.3 hours. Our patient was discharged on post-operative day 1 and had an uneventful recovery without complications. Keys to successful implementation included the judicious, coordinated use of local analgesia as well as the organization of separate operating room bedside tables and scrub techs for each team. Total convalescent leave time and temporary profile duration were reduced by 50% relative to the staged approach: 4 weeks and 3 months versus 8 weeks and 6 months, respectively. Of note, anesthesia provider fees total ∼$8,213 when surgeries are performed as three separate events. For one-stage surgery, anesthesia fees amount to only $1,063 (assuming ∼10 hour anesthesia time with a CRNA provider). Our case study demonstrates that one-stage multidisciplinary surgery can be accomplished without added risk to the patient. Judicious surgical planning, including having surgeons operating at the same time, reduces operative time and provides for efficient operating room utilization. Simultaneous GAS is an effective approach to improve access to surgical care for transgender patients. A single anesthetic enables patients to achieve their surgical goals sooner and to lessen their overall recovery time. This allows service members to return to duty sooner, supporting the Defense Health Agency mission to ensure a medically-ready force. This model should become the standard within MTFs across the DoD, as it promotes improved quality-of-life for patients, decreases personnel costs, and ensures medical readiness.

Technical and Clinical Differences Between Transgender and Cisgender Females Undergoing Breast Augmentation.

Gender-affirming surgery is a quickly expanding field. However, it is facing a shortage of specialized surgeons for a population exceeding 1.4 million individuals. Many studies comparing outcomes between cisgender and transgender patients fail to describe the technical differences of the operation. Breast augmentation in the transgender female patient involves important anatomical, technical, and clinical features that differ from the cisgender female. In this study, we aimed to describe and compare these characteristics between these 2 groups to better inform the new generation of gender-affirming surgeons. A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent primary breast augmentation between 2009 and 2019 at a specialized tertiary center for transgender care was performed. Mastopexy, secondary augmentation, and reconstructive procedures were excluded. Demographic, operative, and clinical data were collected from medical records. All patients had a minimum of 1 year of follow-up after the initial surgery. Bivariate analysis was performed. A total of 250 cisgender females and 153 transgender females were included. The transgender group showed higher rates of smoking ( P < 0.0001), immunosuppression ( P < 0.0001), obesity ( P < 0.0001), mental health disorders ( P < 0.0001), and hypertension ( P = 0.002). Median base width ( P < 0.0001), sternal notch to nipple distance ( P < 0.0001), and implant size (500 mL [interquartile range, 425-600 mL] vs 350 mL [interquartile range, 325-385 mL]; P < 0.0001) were larger in transgender patients. Transgender patients also demonstrated a stronger correlation between implant size and body surface area ( r = 0.71, P < 0.0001). Readmission, reoperation, and complication rates were similar between the groups; however, transgender females had a higher incidence of surgical site infections (3.9% vs 0.4%, P < 0.013). Capsular contracture was the most common complication and indication for reoperation in both groups. There are important anatomical, clinical, and technical differences between reconstructive gender-affirming breast augmentation in transgender female patients and cosmetic breast augmentation in the cisgender female. The gender-affirming surgeon must know these differences to provide the best quality of care and help patients achieve better congruence between their gender identity and body image.

"Patient-Reported Satisfaction and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Breast Augmentation: A follow-up of six months".

To evaluate the success of a breast augmentation, it is essential to measure outcomes from the patient perspective since a successful aesthetic result is especially determined by the patient. This study aimed to evaluate patient-reported satisfaction with their breasts, psychosocial, physical, and sexual well-being in patients undergoing breast augmentation using validated questionnaires. This is a multicenter cohort study based on ongoing routinely-collected data. Patient-reported satisfaction and health-related quality of life were assessed with the BREAST-Q Augmentation Module at intake and six months postoperatively. A total of 1405 patients were included. Large changes in BREAST-Q scores (range, 0-100) between intake and six months postoperatively were seen: satisfaction with their breasts (mean, effect size: +57, 3.8), psychosocial well-being (+38, 2.1), physical well-being (-14, -1.2), and sexual well-being (+44, 2.4). Moreover, improvements in all four scales were not dependent on their intake scores and all postoperative scores reached similar levels. A decreased physical well-being of the chest was measured post-surgery. The satisfaction with the breasts scale correlated moderately to strongly with the psychosocial and sexual well-being scale 6 months post-surgery. Subgroup analysis based on patient characteristics found no differences in outcomes, except for BMI. Significant improvement in patient-reported satisfaction with their breasts, psychosocial, and sexual well-being can be seen six months after breast augmentation despite a declined physical well-being after treatment. Postoperative satisfaction levels do not depend on preoperative scores. These insights can contribute to improve preoperative communication between surgeon and patient regarding the expected outcomes.

A Retrospective Study of Transaxillary Endoscopic Breast Augmentation Using Ultrasonic Scalpel or Conventional Electrocautery for Implant Pocket Dissection.

Ultrasonic scalpel has been reported to be superior to conventional electrocautery in many studies. However, with respect to transaxillary endoscopic breast augmentation, few studies on the effect of ultrasonic scalpel are available in the literature. The medical records of 173 female patients who underwent breast augmentation via endoscopic transaxillary approach from January 2018 to December 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups according to the implant pocket dissection instruments. In group A, the implant pockets were dissected with conventional electrocautery (EC group) on 81 patients, and in group B, ultrasonic scalpel (US group) was used for implant pockets on 92 patients. All operations were performed by the same senior plastic surgeon and the same surgical team. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative total drainage volume, days of drainage, postoperative surgical site pain and hospital stay time of the two groups were compared and analyzed statistically. The average operation time of the US group (83.82 ± 11.57min) was significantly shorter than that of the EC group (101.40 ± 14.36min), intraoperative blood loss in the US group was significantly less than that of the EC group (18.67 ± 6.20ml vs. 21.59 ± 6.44ml), the mean hospital stay days (2.96 ± 0.69 vs. 4.30 ± 1.11), total drainage volume (122.24 ± 43.81 vs. 232.37 ± 99.15), and duration of drain (2.52 ± 0.54 vs. 3.77 ± 1.10), mean VAS score for surgical site pain on 3 postoperative days (5.08 ± 1.35 vs. 6.51 ± 1.36, 4.08 ± 1.16 vs. 5.40 ± 1.32, 3.04 ± 0.91 vs. 4.06 ± 1.11) were significantly lower in the US group compared to the EC group. The ultrasonic scalpel reduces operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, postoperative pain, hospital stay time, and incidence of complications. The ultrasonic scalpel is safe and reliable for transaxillary endoscopic breast augmentation. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Sensory Evaluation of the Nipple-Areolar Complex Following Primary Breast Augmentation: A Comparison of Incision Approaches.

The central inframammary incisional approach for breast augmentation surgery disrupts the fifth anterior intercostal nerve-artery-vein-plexus. The authors hypothesized that preservation of the fifth anterior intercostal neurovascular pedicle might completely preserve nipple-areola complex (NAC) sensitivity after implant breast augmentation. The aim of the study was to analyze if the use of a laterally displaced incision achieves better sensitivity results than the conventional median submammary incision in females who underwent primary breast augmentation surgery. A group of 25 female patients (50 breasts) underwent a surgical protocol for primary prepectoral implant breast augmentation with a laterally displaced submammary incision. This group was compared to a similar group of 25 patients (50 breasts) who underwent breast augmentation through a conventional submammary central approach. Sensitivity testing with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments was performed in both groups preoperatively and on postoperative days 2, 14, and 30, and after 6 months. Both groups were similar in age, BMI, comorbidities, and implant volumes. Preoperatively, all patients reported normal sensory function in both breasts. Postoperatively, in the laterally displaced incision group, sensory function remained normal in NAC areas, whereas in the conventional incision group, all cases presented the same degree of sensitivity diminution at Days 2, 14, and 30 (P = .000). At 6 months, all values were the same as at Day 30. Preservation of the fifth AIC pedicle resulted in complete preservation of preoperative NAC sensitivity. The laterally placed inframammary incision should be considered for patients undergoing primary prepectoral implant breast augmentation.

Morphological Aesthetics Assessment of the Predicted 3D Simulation Results and the Actual Results of Breast Augmentation.

Although three-dimensional (3D) simulations are becoming more common in preoperative breast augmentation planning, this does not necessarily imply that the simulated results are highly accurate. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the 3D simulation technique by comparing the differences in breast morphology between the 3D prediction model and the actual results. The simulation and actual postoperative results of 103 patients who underwent breast augmentation were analyzed retrospectively. Therefore, a 3D model was created, and the parameters of line spacing, nipple position, breast projection, surface area, and volume were evaluated. Furthermore, consider the difference in chest circumferences and breast volume. In comparison with the simulation results, the actual results had a mean increase in the nipple to the inframammary fold (N-IMF) of 0.3cm (P < 0.05) and a mean increase in basal breast width (BW) of 0.3cm (P < 0.001), a difference that was not statistically significant in patients with larger breast volumes. There was a significant difference in the mean upper and lower breast volume distribution between simulated and actual breasts (upper pole 52.9% vs. 49.2%, P < 0.05, and lower pole 47.1% vs. 50.8%, P < 0.001). However, it was not statistically significant in patients with larger chest circumferences. Our study shows that 3D simulation has uncertainties related to the patient's chest circumference and breast volume. Therefore, these two critical factors must be considered when using simulation assessment in preoperative planning. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

An Algorithm for Correction of Mild Tuberous Breast Deformity in Augmentation Mammaplasty: Camouflage or Correct?

Tuberous breast deformity (TBD) is a common abnormality, particularly in patients presenting for breast augmentation. Failure to correct each regional abnormality, including the inframammary fold, lower pole deficiency, nipple-areola complex widening or herniation, or any degree of ptosis, will result in exaggeration of the deformity and a poor aesthetic outcome. To describe an algorithm, including novel techniques, to address each region of mild TBD in patients undergoing breast augmentation. This is a retrospective review and description of the senior author's (K.T.) techniques for correction of early-stage TBD from 2016 to 2021. One hundred forty-two patients underwent a stepwise approach to correct milder TBD features when undergoing breast augmentation. The authors propose a regional algorithm for management of TBD, to allow mostly single-stage correction, except in cases with marked ptosis, severe asymmetry, or marked macroareola.

Nagor Impleo Round Silicone Gel Breast Implants: Early Outcome Analysis after 340 Primary Breast Augmentations.

For decades, implant-based breast augmentation has been one of the most performed surgical procedures for cosmetic purposes around the world. Hence, novel manufactured implants should be critically investigated to prove them safe and effective. Here, the authors describe the first independently conducted clinical study on Nagor Impleo textured round breast implants. For this retrospective study, outcomes of 340 consecutive female patients undergoing primary cosmetic breast augmentation were analyzed. Demographic and surgical data as well as outcomes and complications were evaluated. Furthermore, a survey concerning effectiveness and aesthetic satisfaction after breast augmentation was examined. All 680 implants were placed in a submuscular plane with incisions at the inframammary fold. The main indications for surgery were hypoplasia and hypoplasia with asymmetry. The mean implant volume was 390 cc and the main type of projection was high profile. The most common complications were hematoma and capsular contracture (0.9 percent, respectively). The overall revision rate for complications was 2.4%. Additionally, almost all patients showed increased quality of life and aesthetic satisfaction after a breast augmentation. Hence, all patients would undergo breast augmentation again with these newly launched devices. Nagor Impleo implants demonstrate a low complication rate and high safety profile. Although high aesthetic satisfaction and quality of life results were achieved, analysis of an even larger series over a longer period of time would be beneficial to evaluate the reliability of this implant.