Understory Kelps Research Articles

Ecology of under story kelp environments. I. Effects of kelps on flow and particle transport near the bottom

Because of their likely ecological importance, the effects of understory kelps on fluid and paniculate transport near the bottom were assessed in waters of the San Juan Archipelago, Washington, U.S.A. Relative to more exposed rocky substrata at identical depths, bottoms beneath kelp canopies were exposed to weak fluid transport and were characterized by greater rates of deposition of particulates. A tracer particle experiment demonstrated that kelps inhibited transport of suspended particles from the overlying water column to the bottom. Thus, the higher rates of paniculate deposition beneath kelp canopies probably were caused by longer particle residence times and higher probabilities of paniculate redeposition beneath canopies and not by higher rates of particle import. These hydrodynamic effects may play important roles in the ecology of animals that inhabit understory kelp environments. We propose several potential effects of flow modification by kelps on larval recruitment and dispersal and growth of suspension-feeders.

Spatial Variation in the Structure of Kelp Forest Communities Along a Wave Exposure Gradient

Abstract. Four sites were sampled in kelp (Macrocysiis pyrifera) forests occupying rocky bottom habitats along a wave exposure gradient in central California. Consistent betwecn‐site differences were found in the three major structural elements ‐ the surface canopy, the undcrstory assemblage, and the ground cover/turf assemblage ‐ of kelp forest communities. Macrocysiis pyrifera was found at all four sites. Nereucyslis tuelkeana only at the most exposed site. The understory kelps Laminaria setchellii and Pterygopltora californica were also characteristic of exposed sites. Articulated coralline algae were more abundant at exposed sites than protected, while fleshy red algae showed the opposite pattern. All four study sites were located along 8.5 km of coastline, and thus were assumed to have available to them the same species pool for colonization. The substrate composition was the same and the amount of unconsolidated substrate was similar at all four sites. We suggest that exposure to wave‐generated water motion, through its influence on the surface canopy and therefore on the amount of light reaching the bottom, is responsible for these between‐site differences.

Experimental evaluations of substrate types as barriers to sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus spp.) movement

Descriptive evidence that sandy surfaces and rock ledges inhibit progress of grazing sea urchins prompted an experimental investigation of physical obstacles to urchin movement in a subtidal area of reef and kelp off southern California in 1980. In laboratory experiments, we found that both red (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus) and purple (S. purpuratus) urchins can negotiate sand using their oral spines, although purple urchins are slower and more hesitant to do so. In field experiments, we observed the fates of starved red urchins transported to replicate plots within stands of sand-or rock-based understory kelp (Pterygophora californica). Urchins in rock plots retreated to nearby crevices from where they ate attached kelp. After finding kelp blades, urchins soon disappeared from sand plots because individuals in small groups may have difficulty holding and eating attached kelps on unconsolidated surfaces. In another experiment, red and purple urchins reached kelp on a rock ledge by mounting an artificial ramp. We conclude that by using their tube feet, individuals of both species move best over flat, hard surfaces, although soft substrate may constitute a major barrier only to purple urchins. In the absence of effective predator control, urchins can surmount most sand or rock barriers when water motion subsides. Hence, their ability to coordinate spine movements to negotiate soft substrates may be an adaptation to invade kelp refuges during quiet periods if preferred drift food is unavailable.

Severe storm disturbances and reversal of community structure in a southern California kelp forest

Regular observations made over a period of 5 yr in four permanent transects provided data on plant, sea urchin, and fish densities which indicate that two unusually severe winter storms in 1980 (“Storm I”) and 1983 (“Storm II”) had different effects on a southern California kelp-forest community. Storm I removed all canopies of the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera, but spared most understory kelps, mainly Pterygophora californica. Hence, the previously large accumulation of detached drift kelp, mostly M. pyrifera, disappeared. Denied their preferred diet of drift kelp, the sea urchins Strongylocentrotus franciscanus and S. purpuratus then emerged from shelters to find alternative food. Without effective predators, they consumed most living plants, including the surviving understory kelps. This weakened the important detritus-based food chain, as indicated indirectly by declining abundances of algal turf and fish (Embiotocidae) that eat small animals living in turf. In 1983, Storm II reversed the process by eliminating exposed urchins, while clearing rock surfaces for widespread kelp settlement and growth. By summer 1984, the kelp grew to maturity to form extensive canopies despite elevated water temperatures during summer and fall of 1983. Thus, severe storms may have vastly different effects on community structure, depending on the state of the community before the disturbance.

Catastrophic Storms, El Niño, and Patch Stability in a Southern California Kelp Community

Strong winter storms in southern California destroyed most of the canopy ofthe giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera but not the patches of understory kelps in the Point Loma kelp forest near San Diego. Subsequent massive recruitment of Macrocystis juveniles and adults that survived the storms had low survival in the summer during the California El Niño of 1983. The combined disturbance may have long-lasting structural consequences for this community because, once established, the understory patches can resist invasion by Macrocystis.