YES,31, 200I Authorizing Experience. Reconfigurations oftheBodyPoliticinSeventeenth-Century NewEngland Writing. By JIMEGAN. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. I999. x + 182 pp. /22.50. Jim Egan's study of key seventeenth-century New England writers contributes to the ongoing debate over the nature of Americanization and the theorizing of American national identity. He begins by engaging with the foundational work of Sacvan Bercovitch,while nodding in the direction of PerryMiller'searlierwork in the field. Egan's contribution to this area of inquiry is situated in terms of early American culturalstudies, and he is careful to locate his own work in terms of the contributionof Philip Gura, Andrew Delbanco, MyraJelen, and othersin revising the paradigm for the study of early American literature. Egan looks to dominant scholarlyinterpretationsof the exceptional natureofAmericancultureandnational identityto identifytheprimacyof experience over ideology as a dominatingnational trait. Experience, seen as a national characteristic, is used by Egan in order to analyse the ways in which early American writersused this concept of experience to imagine the relationship between the individual and the community. These rhetorical strategies, according to Egan, became distinctive to the New England colonies but have been recognized as such only in modern culturalanalysessuch as Bercovitch's;he argues, 'The colonial British-Americanwritershad to arguefor the very authority of experience that Miller, Bercovitch, and American literary scholarship in general now take as given' (p. 7). Egan's subject is the body of writingsthat tell of the nation'sfounding and subsequentexplanationsof America's distinctive cultural features; consequently, he focuses his discussion upon the relationship that developed between this emerging rhetoric and colonialism; specifically,the relations between the colonies and England. Egan shows how the writersJohn Smith, William Wood, John Winthrop, Anne Bradstreet, Benjamin Tompson, and William Hubbard were aware of the challenge posed by the value attached to experiential authorityto the inherited patterns of social hierarchythat characterized contemporary English thinking. In his account, this rhetoric of experience enabled colonists to deal with the uncertainty and danger of their position in the New Worldwhile at the same time allowing them to reconceive the notion of Englishness in order to regulate the colonial populations (English and native)by embracinga new understandingof nationalidentity. In a series of chapters, each devoted to the work of one writer, Egan deals with each of his key writers in turn, looking at the uses to which important rhetorical figures such as the body politic are put. He begins with the promotional tracts written by John Smith and William Wood to highlight, first, the debate over experientialauthorityversusthe authorityof rankand, then, theplace of Englishness within these alternativeconceptions of authority.He then turnsto the roleof gender in rhetoricalplay of thesefiguresand uses the Antinomian controversyto show how notions of the body politic were used to regulate internal as well as external (colonial) social relations. FromJohn Winthrop's account of Anne Hutchinson's infection of the community with her Antinomian heresy, Egan moves to Anne Bradstreet's employment of an earlier, sexless model of the body politic which rejectsboth the Preparationistview of bodily experience as passingthrough a series of stages that prepare the unregenerate body for salvation and also rejects the opposition between masculine and feminine bodily experience from which both communal and individual subject formation develops. He concludes with a discussionof the latterhalf of the seventeenth century and writingsthat focus upon the differencesbetween the English communal body and colonial self-government that aregrounded in the particularitiesof colonial New Englandexperience. 305 306 306 Reviews Reviews Puritanismdoes dominate Egan'sdiscussionsandhisanalysesdo tend to highlight the now discreditednotion of New England as the cradle of the Republic. Egan is clearlyawareof these issuesand he counterswith the point thatin orderto provide a coherent and detailednarrativeof the rhetoricof experience he hashad to confine his analysis to a single discursive community. Within the methodological and chronological constraints of his study,Jim Egan has produced an intelligent and compelling account of one important aspect of the early foundations of American culturalidentity. SOUTH BANK UNIVERSITY, LONDON DEBORAH L. MADSEN MasterPlots:RaceandtheFounding of an American Literature, I787-i845. ByJARED GARDNER. Baltimore, MD, and London: Johns Hopkins University Press. 1998. xvii +238pp. C33. 'Master Plotsis an examination of the intersectionof racialand nationaldiscoursesin the "founding" of a national literaturein the United States, a national...