Long QT syndrome (LQTS), a rare inheritable arrhythmia first described by Romano andWard et al. in the 1960s, is characterized by the prolongation of the QT interval on surface ECGs and an increased risk of potentially fatal ventricular arrhythmias, especially torsade de pointes [1]. In 1995, after years of extensive clinical investigation and linkage analysis, several research groups, including Keating et al., successfully identified three distinct LQTS phenotypes (LQT1, LQT2, and LQT3) associated with mutations in genes encoding plasma membrane ion channels (KCNQ1, KCNH2, and SCN5A, respectively) [2–4]. These seminal studies motivated further extensive genetic screening in LQTS patients using a candidate gene approach and functional analyses of the mutant genes. These efforts provided evidence that ion channel genes represent the genetic basis for several other arrhythmogenic syndromes that occur in the structurally intact heart, often referred to as idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. At present, 13 genes responsible for LQTS have been identified. Approximately 90% of the genotyped LQTS subjects belong to the three major subtypes (LQT1-3) [5] in which numbers of distinct genotype-specific clinical characteristics have been demonstrated, including T-wave morphology [6], triggers for cardiac events [7], response to the epinephrine provocation test [8] and drug therapy [9]. Genetic testing for known arrhythmia susceptibility genes has become the standard-of-care for a number of disorders, including LQTS. Considering the remarkable progress of research in this area, there is no doubt that 1995 was the year in which genetic technologies experienced a paradigm shift with respect to both the understanding and clinical management of inherited arrhythmias. However, it should be noted that despite the rapid progress in understanding the genetic basis, the etiology still remains unknown in approximately 20% of LQTS conditions [10]. Therefore, additional studies are needed to reveal the missing heritable factors associated with these syndromes. Traditionally, DNA sequence information has been elucidated using Sanger sequencing, but this method is limited by the amount of DNA that can be processed at a given time and by the read length (average 800 base pairs). Although the Human Genome Project completed the sequencing of the entire human genome in 2001 using Sanger sequencing, it took 13 years of effort at an estimated cost of $2.7 billion. Now, next-generation sequencing (NGS), a revolutionary new genetic technology, has enabled whole genomes to be sequenced over a period of a few days at projected costs of less than $10,000. This technology involves massively parallel sequencing of clonally amplified or single DNA molecules that are spatially separated in a flow cell. To date, the genes responsible for disease in more than 3000 Mendelian disorders have yet to be identified. NGS opens up exciting new possibilities of discovering the genes associated with these monogenic disorders. Classical strategies involve linkage analysis in families with known shared genetic heritage by identifying candidate genomic regions encompassing the gene