Understanding Of Noise Research Articles

Development of cortical auditory responses to speech in noise in unilaterally deaf adults following cochlear implantation.

BackgroundFor patients with single-sided deafness (SSD), restoration of binaural function via cochlear implant (CI) has been shown to improve speech understanding in noise. The objective of this study was to investigate changes in behavioral performance and cortical auditory responses following cochlear implantation.DesignProspective longitudinal study.SettingTertiary referral center.MethodsSix adults with SSD were tested before and 12 months post-activation of the CI. Six normal hearing (NH) participants served as experimental controls. Speech understanding in noise was evaluated for various spatial conditions. Cortical auditory evoked potentials were recorded with /ba/ stimuli in quiet and in noise. Global field power and responses at Cz were analyzed.ResultsSpeech understanding in noise significantly improved with the CI when speech was presented to the CI ear and noise to the normal ear (p<0.05), but remained poorer than that of NH controls (p<0.05). N1 peak amplitude measure in noise significantly increased after CI activation (p<0.05), but remained lower than that of NH controls (p<0.05) at 12 months. After 12 months of CI experience, cortical responses in noise became more comparable between groups.ConclusionBinaural restoration in SSD patients via cochlear implantation improved speech performance noise and cortical responses. While behavioral performance and cortical auditory responses improved, SSD-CI outcomes remained poorer than that of NH controls in most cases, suggesting only partial restoration of binaural hearing.

Assessment of Speech Understanding After Cochlear Implantation in Adult Hearing Aid Users

Cochlear implants were approved for use in adults in the 1980s, but use remains low owing to a lack of awareness regarding cochlear implantation candidacy criteria and expected outcomes. There have been limited, small series examining the safety and effectiveness of cochlear implantation in adult hearing aid (HA) users with and without mild cognitive impairment (MCI). To investigate the safety and effectiveness of a single-ear cochlear implant in a group of optimized adult HA users with and without MCI across a variety of domains. In this nonrandomized controlled trial, a multicenter, prospective, repeated-measures investigation was conducted at 13 US institutions. The setting was academic and community-based cochlear implant programs. Eligible participants were 100 adults (aged >18 years) with postlinguistic onset of bilateral moderate sloping to profound or worse sensorineural hearing loss (≤20 years' duration). Fluent English speakers underwent an optimized bilateral HA trial for at least 30 days. Individuals with aided Consonant-Vowel Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word score in quiet of 40% or less correct in the ear to be implanted and 50% or less correct in the contralateral ear were offered cochlear implants. The first participant was enrolled on February 20, 2017, and the last participant was enrolled on May 3, 2018. The final follow-up was on December 21, 2018. Participants received the same cochlear implant system and contralateral HA. The primary outcome measure was speech understanding in quiet (CNC word score) using both the cochlear implant and opposite ear HA. Secondary outcome measures included the following: adverse events; speech understanding in noise (AzBio signal-to-noise ratio of +10 db [+10 SNR]) Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3); Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Questionnaire 49 (SSQ49); and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The median age at cochlear implantation of the 96 patients included in the trial was 71 years (range, 23-91 years), and 62 patients (65%) were male. Three serious adverse events requiring revision surgery occurred, and all resolved without sequelae. By 6 months after activation, the absolute marginal mean change in CNC word score and AzBio +10 SNR was 40.5% (95% CI, 35.9%-45.0%) and 24.1% (95% CI, 18.9%-29.4%), respectively. Ninety-one percent (87 of 96) of participants had a clinically important improvement (>15%) in the CNC word score in the implant ear. Mild cognitive impairment (MoCA total score ≤25) was observed in 48 of 81 study participants (59%) at baseline. Speech perception marginal mean improvements were similar between individuals with and without baseline MCI, with values of 40.9% (95% CI, 35.2%-46.6%) and 39.6% (95% CI, 31.8%-47.4%), respectively, for CNC word score and 27.5% (95% CI, 21.0%-33.9%) and 17.8% (95% CI, 9.0%-26.6%), respectively, for AzBio +10 SNR. Statistically significant and clinically important improvements in the HUI3 and SSQ49 were evident at 6 months. The findings of this nonrandomized controlled trial seem to indicate that cochlear implants are safe and effective in restoring speech understanding in both quiet and noise and improve quality of life in individuals with and without MCI. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03007472.

Efficacy of Auditory Training Using Video Clips for Older Adults Who Wear Hearing Aids

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of training using the developed videos in terms of speech perception in noise and cognitive ability.Methods: For the training materials, we had 16 video clips edited from new, TV shows, and movies. To evaluate the auditory training effect when using the video clips, a total of 17 subjects participated in this study; all of the subjects had worn hearing aids for 1 to 3 months. Among the 17 subjects, ten of them completed eight sessions, 40 minutes per session, of the auditory training, while the other seven subjects did not have any training chance. Sentence recognition in noise tests, cognition tests such as digit span (auditory-only and auditory-visual conditions) attention tests, and subjective satisfaction of hearing aids were evaluated at both pre- and post-auditory training.Results: There were significantly improved sentence recognition in noise, attention, and subjective hearing aid satisfaction in the auditory training group. However, there was no significant improvement in the digit span after the auditory training. In the non-training group, none of the tests’ scores were significantly changed, other than subjective hearing aid satisfaction.Conclusion: These results suggested that auditory training with video clip is an effective method to improve speech understanding in noise and subjective satisfaction as well as cognitive ability, attention. However, we did not observe working memory improvement after the training. For future study, we need to examine an effective method for improving cognitive ability, especially working memory.

Acoustic Hearing Can Interfere With Single-Sided Deafness Cochlear-Implant Speech Perception.

Cochlear implants (CIs) restore some spatial advantages for speech understanding in noise to individuals with single-sided deafness (SSD). In addition to a head-shadow advantage when the CI ear has a better signal-to-noise ratio, a CI can also provide a binaural advantage in certain situations, facilitating the perceptual separation of spatially separated concurrent voices. While some bilateral-CI listeners show a similar binaural advantage, bilateral-CI listeners with relatively large asymmetries in monaural speech understanding can instead experience contralateral speech interference. Based on the interference previously observed for asymmetric bilateral-CI listeners, this study tested the hypothesis that in a multiple-talker situation, the acoustic ear would interfere with rather than improve CI speech understanding for SSD-CI listeners. Experiment 1 measured CI-ear speech understanding in the presence of competing speech or noise for 13 SSD-CI listeners. Target speech from the closed-set coordinate response-measure corpus was presented to the CI ear along with one same-gender competing talker or stationary noise at target-to-masker ratios between -8 and 20 dB. The acoustic ear was presented with silence (monaural condition) or with a copy of the competing speech or noise (bilateral condition). Experiment 2 tested a subset of 6 listeners in the reverse configuration for which SSD-CI listeners have previously shown a binaural benefit (target and competing speech presented to the acoustic ear; silence or competing speech presented to the CI ear). Experiment 3 examined the possible influence of a methodological difference between experiments 1 and 2: whether the competing talker spoke keywords that were inside or outside the response set. For each experiment, the data were analyzed using repeated-measures logistic regression. For experiment 1, a correlation analysis compared the difference between bilateral and monaural speech-understanding scores to several listener-specific factors: speech understanding in the CI ear, preimplantation duration of deafness, duration of CI experience, ear of deafness (left/right), acoustic-ear audiometric thresholds, and listener age. In experiment 1, presenting a copy of the competing speech to the acoustic ear reduced CI speech-understanding scores for target-to-masker ratios ≥4 dB. This interference effect was limited to competing-speech conditions and was not observed for a noise masker. There was dramatic intersubject variability in the magnitude of the interference (range: 1 to 43 rationalized arcsine units), which was found to be significantly correlated with listener age. The interference effect contrasted sharply with the reverse configuration (experiment 2), whereby presenting a copy of the competing speech to the contralateral CI ear significantly improved performance relative to monaural acoustic-ear performance. Keyword condition (experiment 3) did not influence the observed pattern of interference. Most SSD-CI listeners experienced interference when they attended to the CI ear and competing speech was added to the acoustic ear, although there was a large amount of intersubject variability in the magnitude of the effect, with older listeners particularly susceptible to interference. While further research is needed to investigate these effects under free-field listening conditions, these results suggest that for certain spatial configurations in a multiple-talker situation, contralateral speech interference could reduce the benefit that an SSD-CI otherwise provides.

Evaluating the Impact of Age, Acoustic Exposure, and Electrical Stimulation on Binaural Sensitivity in Adult Bilateral Cochlear Implant Patients.

Deafness in both ears is highly disruptive to communication in everyday listening situations. Many individuals with profound deafness receive bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) to gain access to spatial cues used in localization and speech understanding in noise. However, the benefit of bilateral CIs, in particular sensitivity to interaural time and level differences (ITD and ILDs), varies among patients. We measured binaural sensitivity in 46 adult bilateral CI patients to explore the relationship between binaural sensitivity and three classes of patient-related factors: age, acoustic exposure, and electric hearing experience. Results show that ILD sensitivity increased with shorter years of acoustic exposure, younger age at testing, or an interaction between these factors, moderated by the duration of bilateral hearing impairment. ITD sensitivity was impacted by a moderating effect between years of bilateral hearing impairment and CI experience. When age at onset of deafness was treated as two categories (<18 vs. >18 years of age), there was no clear effect for ILD sensitivity, but some differences were observed for ITD sensitivity. Our findings imply that maximal binaural sensitivity is obtained by listeners with a shorter bilateral hearing impairment, a longer duration of CI experience, and potentially a younger age at testing. 198/200.

The effects of behind-the-ear and off-the-ear sound processors on speech understanding performance in cochlear implant users

ObjectiveThe first aim of this study was to compare speech understanding performance in adult cochlear implant users using behind-the-ear and off-the-ear sound processors in quiet and noise. Second, the impact of sound processor microphone location on speech understanding performance was compared. MethodsParticipants were tested with both types of sound processors in the free field with warble tones, and speech discrimination scores in quiet were obtained. Turkish Matrix Test was used to measure speech understanding in noise with five different loudspeaker settings. Twenty-seven participants of cochlear implants between 16 and 67 years-of-age using behind-the-ear or off-the-ear sound processors were included in the study. The results obtained with two types of sound processors were compared. ResultsAided free field thresholds were significantly better for the behind-the-ear vs. off-the-ear sound processor. The mean difference was 3.3 dB HL. There was no significant difference in speech discrimination scores in quite between the two processors (p > 0.05). Statistically significant differences were not seen for speech intelligibility in five spatial settings in the Turkish Matrix Test (p > 0.05). ConclusionAlthough both types of sound processors had different microphone locations, the outcomes were found to be consistent with previous results in adult users off-the-ear sound processors, demonstrating equivalent speech understanding in quiet and noise.

Tinnitus Affects Speech in Noise Comprehension in Individuals With Hearing Loss.

Tinnitus is a prevalent auditory disorder that frequently co-occurs with hearing loss. It is suggested that tinnitus might have negative impact on speech perception. However, studies thus far have not been able to disentangle tinnitus, hearing loss, and speech in noise intelligibility. We therefore investigated whether there is an association between tinnitus and speech understanding in noise, independent of hearing loss. Of 4,211 participants from the population-based Rotterdam Study (mean age 67.8 [SD 8.9], 57.3% female) data was available on tinnitus, pure-tone audiometry, and digits in noise test. We compared the speech reception threshold in noise (SRTn) in participants with and without tinnitus for the whole population as well as for subgroups stratified for average hearing threshold in 10-dB strata. Additionally, we regressed tinnitus on SRTn with a multivariable regression model, adjusting for sex, age, highest achieved education, and cognitive function. Participants with tinnitus (20.8%) had a higher SRTn (-3.6 dB [SD 3.7] versus -4.6 dB [SD 3.1]). This difference remained only in the subgroups of participants with hearing loss, between 0.6 and 0.8 dB difference in the SRTn for the different subgroups. In the fully adjusted model tinnitus was associated with 0.2 dB (95% CI 0.00, 0.39) SRTn increase. We have shown that tinnitus is associated with speech intelligibility in noise, but it is a small effect, only found in people with co-occurring hearing loss.

Evaluation of temporal and suprasegmental auditory processing in patients with unilateral hearing loss

ObjectivesTo determine the temporal order, resolution, and perception of prosody skills in Single-Sided Deafness (SSD) compared to an age- and sex-matched normal hearing group's same side ear and both ears. MethodsThis was a Case-Control study including 30 subjects with SSD, and age- and sex-matched 30 subjects with bilateral normal hearing (total of 60 subjects- mean age: 38.7 ± 11.6 years). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Frequency Pattern Test (FPT), Duration Pattern Test (DPT), Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT), Evaluation of Motor Response Time and Emotional Prosody Assessment were performed on the clinically normal ear in the SSD group, the same side ear in the normal hearing group, and both ears of the normal hearing group (the SSD, MNH, and BNH groups, respectively). ResultsIndividuals with SSD had worse results in DPT (p < .001), gap detection at 0.5 kHz (p < .001), gap detection at 4 kHz (p < .001), and composite score (p < .001) than the BNH group. For reaction time measurements, the SSD group had slower performance scores than the BNH group for DPT (p < .001) and FPT (p < .001). ConclusionsPoor temporal processing ability and reduced reaction times may help explain the difficulties in those with SSD in performing daily living activities such as speech understanding in noise and requires more processing efforts. However, there were no significant differences between the groups in frequency pattern performance and emotional prosody skills, supporting the claim that fundamental frequency is one of the most important measures of perception in emotional prosody. We demonstrated that unilateral hearing is adequate to analyze frequency patterns to aid in prosody perception. Analysis of reaction times in temporal processing and emotional prosody could provide different perspectives of auditory processing. Slower reaction time of SSD should be considered for habilitation purposes.

AVATAR Assesses Speech Understanding and Multitask Costs in Ecologically Relevant Listening Situations.

There is a high need among clinicians and researchers for an ecologically valid measure of auditory functioning and listening effort. Therefore, we developed AVATAR: an "Audiovisual True-to-life Assessment of Auditory Rehabilitation" which takes important characteristics of real-life listening situations into account, such as multimodal speech presentation, spatial separation of sound sources and multitasking. As such, AVATAR aims to assess both auditory functioning and the amount of allocated processing resources during listening in a realistic yet controllable way. In the present study, we evaluated AVATAR and investigated whether speech understanding in noise and multitask costs during realistic listening environments changed with increasing task complexity. Thirty-five young normal-hearing participants performed different task combinations of an auditory-visual speech-in-noise task and three secondary tasks on both auditory localization and visual short-term memory in a simulated restaurant environment. Tasks were combined in increasing complexity and multitask costs on the secondary tasks were investigated as an estimate of the amount of cognitive resources allocated during listening and multitasking. In addition to behavioral measures of auditory functioning and effort, working memory capacity and self-reported hearing difficulties were established using a reading span test and a questionnaire on daily hearing abilities. Whereas performance on the speech-in-noise task was not affected by task complexity, multitask costs on one of the secondary tasks became significantly larger with increasing task complexity. Working memory capacity correlated significantly with multitask costs, but no association was observed between behavioral outcome measures and self-reported hearing abilities or effort. AVATAR proved to be a promising model to assess speech intelligibility and auditory localization abilities and to gauge the amount of processing resources during effortful listening in ecologically relevant multitasking situations by means of multitask costs. In contrast with current clinical measures of auditory functioning, results showed that listening and multitasking in challenging listening environments can require a considerable amount of processing resources, even for young normal-hearing adults. Furthermore, the allocation of resources increased in more demanding listening situations. These findings open avenues for a more realistic assessment of auditory functioning and individually tuned auditory rehabilitation for individuals of different age and hearing profiles.

Prediction of Software-Based Sentence-in-Noise Recognition Thresholds of Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Purpose: Although hearing-impaired (HI) listeners often have difficulty understanding in noise as their primary complaints, the speech-in-noise intelligibility test is not conducted as a standard audiologic test battery. This study investigated whether the speech audiometry in quiet accurately reflects the sentence-in-noise intelligibility of HI listeners. Methods: Sixty-two HI listeners participated. All the HI listeners had symmetrical high-frequency hearing loss and bilaterally worn hearing aids. Twenty-five normal-hearing (NH) listeners also participated as a control group. The unaided word and sentence recognition scores (WRS and SRS) were obtained in quiet at individually determined most comfortable loudness level. With bilateral hearing aids, the aided WRS and SRS were evaluated at a normal conversational level. The software-based Korean Matrix sentence in noise test was administered at a fixed level (65 dB SPL) of noise while adjusting the sentence level adaptively based on the listener’s response. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) required to achieve 50% intelligibility (speech recognition thresholds, SRTs) was obtained. Results: On average, the aided SRT of HI listeners was 0.1 dB SNR, and the mean SRT of NH adults was -8.91 dB SNR. The Matrix sentence-in-noise intelligibility was not sufficiently explained by the unaided WRS or unaided SRS. Conclusion: A traditional measure of the unaided speech-in-quiet recognition cannot accurately predict the aided speech-innoise intelligibility. Clinically, a software-based sentence-in-noise intelligibility test is recommended to directly confirm the actual benefits of hearing aid in noisy situations.

Assessment of Temporal Fine Structure Processing Among Older Adults With Cochlear Implants.

The purpose of this study was to determine if older adults with cochlear implants are able to take advantage of coding schemes that preserve temporal fine structure (TFS) cues. A total of 19 older adults with cochlear implants participated in a prospective, repeated measures, A to B design. Participants entered the study using TFS. The participants used strategy A (high definition continuous interleaved sampling [HDCIS]) for 3 months and strategy B (TFS) for 3 months. Endpoint testing was administered at the end of each 3-month period. Testing included consonant recognition, speech understanding in noise, temporal modulation thresholds, and self-perceived benefit. Older adults were able to use TFS successfully. Speech perception performance was improved using TFS compared with HDCIS for voicing, but not manner or place of articulation. There were no differences between the two strategies for speech understanding in noise, temporal modulation detection, or self-perceived benefit. At the end of the study, 13 out of 19 (68%) of participants chose to continue using TFS processing. Advanced age does not prevent adults with cochlear implants from using TFS coding strategies. Performance outcomes using TFS and HDCIS were similar, with the exception of voicing which was improved when using TFS. The data support the idea of using various sound processing strategies with older adults.

Hearing in Noise With Unilateral Versus Bilateral Bone Conduction Hearing Aids in Adults With Pseudo-conductive Hearing Loss.

The role of bilateral bone conduction amplification in patients with bilateral conductive hearing loss is unclear because cranial attenuation is usually considered negligible, and both cochleae can be stimulated with similar efficacy by each device. The aim of the study was to determine if bilateral bone-conduction hearing aids can improve hearing in noise in a homogeneous group of normal-hearing subjects with bilateral pseudo-conductive hearing loss. Prospective, comparative. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders in University of Haifa, Israel. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders in University of Haifa, Israel. Induction of bilateral pseudo-conductive hearing loss of more than 35 dB using earplugs and earmuffs. Hearing quality on blinded comparison of unilateral versus bilateral amplification with bone-conduction hearing aids under different locations of noise. Unilateral and bilateral amplification had similar efficacy when both signal and noise were presented from the front. However, bilateral amplification was significantly better when signals were presented from the front and noise was presented from both sides (SNR -10: 92% vs. 84%, p = 0.001; SNR -15: 84% vs. 78%, p = 0.005). Analysis of subject responses on blinded questionnaires revealed that 81% found hearing easier with bilateral amplification. Noise was reported to be more disturbing with unilateral amplification by 55% of the subjects and with bilateral amplification, by 9%. Bilateral amplification with bone conduction devices can improve understanding in noise in the binaural squelch setting. Subjective improvements with bilateral bone-conduction aids included better sound quality and reduced noise disturbance. These findings are consistent with the binaural mechanism of spectral release from masking.

Spatial hearing and speech understanding in noise in elderly

Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate spatial hearing in elderly with and without complaint about speech understanding in noise. Methods Persian spatial hearing questionnaire (P-SHQ) was investigated in the elderly with and without speech understanding difficulty in noise and in normal young adults. ANOVA test was used for comparing results of the eight sub-characteristics of the P-SHQ among three groups. Results Both elderly groups had lower performance in source localisation, understanding speech in noise with target and noise sources from the front, understanding speech in noise with spatially separate target and noise sources. There was a significant difference between the two elderly groups in understanding speech in noise with target and noise sources from the front. Conclusions It shows that although the elderly have lower spatial performance than young adults, they still can benefit from the spatial separation of sound sources.

The Association Between Physiological Noise Levels and Speech Understanding in Noise.

Traditionally, elevated hearing thresholds have been considered to be the main contributors to difficulty understanding speech in noise; yet, patients will often report difficulties with speech understanding in noise despite having audiometrically normal hearing. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to critically evaluate the relationship of various metrics of auditory function (behavioral thresholds and otoacoustic emissions) on speech understanding in noise in a large sample of audiometrically normal-hearing individuals. Behavioral hearing thresholds, distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) levels, stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission levels, and physiological noise (quantified using OAE noise floors) were measured from 921 individuals between 10 and 68 years of age with normal pure-tone averages. The quick speech-in-noise (QuickSIN) test outcome, quantified as the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) loss, was used as the metric of speech understanding in noise. Principle component analysis (PCA) and linear regression modeling were used to evaluate the relationship between the measures of auditory function and speech in noise performance. Over 25% of participants exhibited mild or worse degree of SNR loss. PCA revealed DPOAE levels at 12.5 to 16 kHz to be significantly correlated with the variation in QuickSIN scores, although correlations were weak (R = 0.017). Out of all the metrics evaluated, higher levels of self-generated physiological noise accounted for the most variance in QuickSIN performance (R = 0.077). Higher levels of physiological noise were associated with worse QuickSIN performance in listeners with normal hearing sensitivity. We propose that elevated physiological noise levels in poorer speech in noise performers could diminish the effective SNR, thereby negatively impacting performance as seen by poorer QuickSIN scores.

Neural Modulation Transmission Is a Marker for Speech Perception in Noise in Cochlear Implant Users.

Cochlear implants (CIs) restore functional hearing in persons with a severe hearing impairment. Despite being one of the most successful bionic prosthesis, performance with CI (in particular speech understanding in noise) varies considerably across its users. The ability of the auditory pathway to encode temporal envelope modulations (TEMs) and the effect of degenerative processes associated with hearing loss on TEM encoding is assumed to be one of the reasons underlying the large intersubject differences in CI performance. The objective of the present study was to investigate how TEM encoding of the stimulated neural ensembles of human CI recipients is related to speech perception in noise (SPIN). We used electroencephalography as a noninvasive electrophysiological measure to assess TEM encoding in the auditory pathway of CI users by means of the 40-Hz electrically evoked auditory steady state response (EASSR). Nine CI users with a wide range of SPIN outcome were included in the present study. TEM encoding was assessed for each stimulation electrode of each subject and new metrics; the CI neural modulation transmission difference (CIMTD) and the CI neural modulation transmission index (CIMTI) were developed to quantify the amount of variability in TEM encoding across the stimulated neural ensembles of the CI electrode array. EASSR patterns varied across the CI electrode array and subjects. We found a strong correlation (r = 0.89, p = 0.001) between the SPIN outcomes and the variability in EASSR amplitudes across the array as assessed with CIMTD/CIMTI. The results of the present study show that the 40-Hz EASSR can be used to objectively assess the neural encoding of TEMs in human CI recipients. Overall reduced or largely variable TEM encoding of the neural ensembles across the electrode array, as quantified with the CIMTD/CIMTI, is highly correlated with speech perception in noise outcome with a CI.

Cochlear implants in single-sided deafness – clinical results of a Swiss multicentre study

The aim of this multicentre, prospective, open, nonrandomised clinical trial was to demonstrate the clinical efficiency and outcomes of cochlear implants (CIs) in adult patients with post-lingual single-sided deafness (SSD). A group of five left and five right SSD participants were investigated with various clinical tests and questionnaires before and 12 months after CI activation. Changes in hearing thresholds, speech understanding in noise, sound localisation, tinnitus (Tinnitus Handicap Inventory; THI), subjective hearing ability (Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale; SSQ), and quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF) were assessed. In addition, the pre- and postoperative results of the SSD patients were compared with an age- and gender-matched normal hearing control group. Surgery was uncomplicated in all patients. Two years after implantation, 9 of the 10 patients used their CI regularly for an average of more than 11 hours a day. A significant improvement in speech understanding in noise measured in the sound field using the Oldenburg sentence test could be demonstrated in the two situations in which patients with SSD experience the greatest difficulty: speech from the front and noise at the healthy ear, and speech to the implanted ear and noise from the front. The sound localisation test showed significant improvement of the mean localisation error and the root mean square error after CI activation. Furthermore, a significant reduction of the THI was measured, and the SSQ showed a significant improvement in the subscale speech comprehension and in the subscale spatial hearing. Also, quality of life measured with the WHOQOL-BREF showed a general improvement, which was significant in the global subscale. For this questionnaire, there was no significant difference between the normal-hearing control group and the patients after 12 months of CI use. This study confirmed the clinical benefit of cochlear implantation in patients with SSD. The significant improvement of speech understanding in noise, sound localisation, tinnitus perception, subjective hearing ability, and in particular the improved quality of life support the recommendation that patients with recently acquired SSD should be offered a CI. (Clinical trial registration number on clinicaltrial.gov: NCT01749592).

Influence of maximum power output on speech understanding with bone anchored hearing systems

Background: Maximum power output (MPO) levels of bone anchored hearing systems (BAHS) vary between different devices, but are significantly lower than those of conventional hearing aids, potentially limiting speech understanding.Aims/objectives: To investigate, how MPO influences speech understanding in quiet and in noise in BAHS users.Materials and methods: 12 adult BAHS users with a bilateral conductive hearing loss and additional sensorineural hearing components between 4 and 45 dB (500–4000 Hz) participated in the study. Speech understanding was measured at 65 dB in quiet and in noise with 4 different MPO level settings, covering the approximate range of MPOs found in currently available BAHS devices.Results: Speech understanding in quiet and in noise decreased with increasing sensorineural hearing loss. MPOs levels did not influence speech understanding in quiet significantly. In contrast, speech understanding in noise was better with higher MPOs (average improvement in signal-to-noise ratio +3.2 dB, p < .001), but only if the sensorineural hearing loss component was above approximately 35 dB.Conclusions and significance: At normal conversational levels, higher MPOs have little or no influence on speech understanding in quiet with BAHS. However, they can improve speech understanding in noise for users with additional sensorineural hearing loss.

Speech perception, real-ear measurements and self-perceived hearing impairment after remote and face-to-face programming of hearing aids: A randomized single-blind agreement study

Introduction Current literature does not provide strong evidence that remote programming of hearing aids is effective, despite its increasing use by audiologists. We tested speech perception outcomes, real-ear insertion gain, and changes in self-perceived hearing impairment after face-to-face and remote programming of hearing aids in a randomized multicentre, single-blind crossover study. Methods Adult experienced hearing aid users were enrolled during routine follow-up visits to audiology clinics. Hearing aids were programmed both face to face and remotely, then participants randomly received either the face-to-face or remote settings in a blinded manner and were evaluated 5 weeks later. Participants then received the other settings and were evaluated 5 weeks later. Results Data from 52 out of 60 participants were analysed. We found excellent concordance in performance of hearing aids programmed face to face and remotely for speech understanding in quiet (phonetically balanced kindergarten test – intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.92 (95% confidence interval: 0.87–0.95)), and good concordance in performance for speech understanding in noise (phonetically balanced kindergarten +5 dB signal-to-noise ratio – intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.55–0.82)). Face-to-face and remote programming took 10 minutes (±2.9) and 10 minutes (±2.8), respectively. Real-ear insertion gains were highly correlated for input sound at 50, 65 and 80 dB sound pressure levels. The programming type did not affect the abbreviated profile of hearing aid questionnaire scores. Conclusions In experienced hearing aid users, face-to-face and remote programming of hearing aids give similar results in terms of speech perception, with no increase in the time spent on patients’ care and no difference in self-reported hearing benefit. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02589561

Effects of rate and age in processing interaural time and level differences in normal-hearing and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.

Bilateral cochlear implants (BICIs) provide improved sound localization and speech understanding in noise compared to unilateral CIs. However, normal-hearing (NH) listeners demonstrate superior binaural processing abilities compared to BICI listeners. This investigation sought to understand differences between NH and BICI listeners' processing of interaural time differences (ITDs) and interaural level differences (ILDs) as a function of fine-structure and envelope rate using an intracranial lateralization task. The NH listeners were presented band-limited acoustical pulse trains and sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones using headphones, and the BICI listeners were presented single-electrode electrical pulse trains using direct stimulation. Lateralization range increased as fine-structure rate increased for ILDs in BICI listeners. Lateralization range decreased for rates above 100 Hz for fine-structure ITDs, but decreased for rates lower or higher than 100 Hz for envelope ITDs in both groups. Lateralization ranges for ITDs were smaller for BICI listeners on average. After controlling for age, older listeners showed smaller lateralization ranges and BICI listeners had a more rapid decline for ITD sensitivity at 300 pulses per second. This work suggests that age confounds comparisons between NH and BICI listeners in temporal processing tasks and that some NH-BICI binaural processing differences persist even when age differences are adequately addressed.

Hearing loss and speech understanding in noise in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children from locations varying in remoteness and socio-educational advantage

ObjectiveOtitis media resulting in conductive hearing loss is a major health issue for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children, which can also lead to the child developing spatial processing disorder (SPD). This study examined the prevalence of hearing loss and deficits in speech understanding in noise, including SPD, in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children from schools varying in remoteness and socio-educational advantage. Method288 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children aged 4–14 years from three schools varying in remoteness and socio-educational advantage completed audiological assessment and the Listening in Spatialized Noise – Sentences test to assess for hearing loss and SPD. Children also completed Sound Scouts, a self-administered tablet-based hearing test which screens for these deficits. The prevalence of hearing issues was compared to what is expected from a typical population. ResultsThe proportion of children with hearing problems was related to the school's socio-educational advantage, with higher proportions in schools with a lower socio-educational advantage. Proportions of children with speech-in-noise deficits (including SPD) was related to the remoteness of the school, with higher proportions in schools that were more remote. ConclusionsThe prevalence of hearing loss and SPD is much higher in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children than described for non-Aboriginal populations, and is related to the socio-educational advantage or remoteness of the school. Resources are needed to reduce the incidence of hearing loss and health disparity in Aboriginal communities, especially those in remote areas with lower socio-educational advantages.