Carlin Romano American the Philosophical. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2012. 688 pp. $1.99 Hardcover, isbn: 9780679434702. $18 paperback, isbn: 9780345804709. $13.99 e-book, isbn: 9780307958211.In America the Philosophical, journalist, philosopher, and professor Carlin Romano defends the seemingly indefensible:For the surprising little secret of our ardently capitalist, famously materialist, heavily iPodded, iPadded and iPhoned society is that America in the early twenty-first century towers as the most philosophical culture in the history of the world, an unprecedented marketplace of truth and argument that far surpasses ancient Greece, Cartesian France, nineteenthcentury Germany or any other place one name over the past three millennia (p. 10).As more articles and books decrying American anti-intellectualism appear every year, asserting that we already live in the dystopian future of Mike Judge's film Idiocracy, Romano has set a prodigious task for himself. He is up to it, covering an immense range of culture, history, and philosophy. His full-scale assault (p. 19) on the idea that America is unphilosophical, at best, covers seven distinct points:1. A reappraisal of American philosophy, one sensitive to biography.2. The rise of nonprofessional philosophers and their role in the public sphere.3. The increasing role of underrepresented peoples in changing what counts as 'philosophy.'4. The development of 'cyberphilosophy' and its concentration in America.5. A characterization of American as following Isocrates, rather than Socrates.6. An explanation for the rejection of 'justification' talk, as exemplified in the success, and failure, of John Rawls.7. Finally, an account of Barack Obama as a cosmopolitan philosopher-inchief.Let me fill in a little more of Romano's trajectory. He starts with Emerson, and moves through Peirce, James, Santayana, and Dewey to Quine, Nozick, Rawls, Dworkin, Posner, Danto, Cavell and ultimately Rorty. For each, Romano uses his journalistic eye to present each man as more than a set of arguments and theories to be analyzed. Instead, they were people (not so) simply trying to figure things out, including the very of as a profession. Rorty receives the most attention, as both the apotheosis of classical pragmatism's pluralism, and also the deflation of the aspirations of technical analytic philosophy. Romano highlights Rorty's (re)introduction of Continental thinkers into mainstream philosophical debates. Fortunately, while Romano does not address 'American Continental Philosophy' thematically, he does acknowledge the continuous influence of thinkers such as Hannah Arendt in nonmainstream philosophy.Rorty's revolution, in Romano's phrase, also opens the possibility for considering those outside departments as philosophers, whether broadcasters (Bill Moyers), psychologists (Oliver Sacks), or literary critics (Kenneth Burke), among others. Romano's point throughout is that considering American unphilosophical only makes sense within the parochial view that true is what happened at Harvard in the 1950s:Yet if one recognized philosophy as a word and activity that preceded this professional sect into the world, didn't the burden fall on those identifying philosophy with rareified research programs that sought universally satisfying definitions for contested everyday words such as truth, meaning and knowledge (not to mention can and must) to justify their artificial narrowing of the terms? (p. 143).Next, Romano reviews the expansion of through the stilltoo-neglected role of African Americans, homosexuals, Native Americans, and women in American thought. Again, Romano is remarkably inclusive, sketching the ideas and lives of the (grudgingly) canonical (Jane Addams, Alain Locke), well-established (Kwame Anthony Appiah, Martha Nussbaum), and the supposedly unphilosophical (Michael Eric Dyson, Susan Sontag). …
Read full abstract