Underwent D2 Gastrectomy Research Articles

Evaluation of pathologic response and surgical safety of total neoadjuvant therapy for patients with clinical stage III gastric cancer in a real-world setting

BackgroundPerioperative chemotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer. However, the potential benefit of extending therapy before surgery remains largely unknown. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of total neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with or without immune checkpoint blockade. MethodsA cohort of 174 patients with clinical stage III gastric cancer who underwent D2 gastrectomy from October 2021 to March 2024 in the real-world setting were included in this study. Among these patients, 101 were treated with total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) and 73 were treated with perioperative neoadjuvant therapy (PNT). We compared the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, ypN0 rate, recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and postoperative complications between the 2 groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with pCR or ypN0. ResultsCompared with the PNT group, the patients in the TNT group were more frequently treated with intensive chemotherapy with triplets + immunotherapy. Apart from this, there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics. There were no statistically significant differences in pCR (16.8% vs 12.3%), ypN0 (49.5% vs 38.4%), RFS, OS, and postoperative complications (27.7% vs 26.0%) between the TNT and PNT groups. Older age, diffuse type, and stable disease/progressive disease based on clinical efficacy evaluation were independently associated with non-pCR. Stable disease/progressive disease, linitis plastica, and poor differentiation were independently associated with ypN+. Neither the number of neoadjuvant therapy cycles nor the specific regimens were associated with pCR or ypN0. In the subgroup analysis of patients receiving total gastrectomy, there were still no statistically significant differences in pCR (16.7% vs 2.6%), ypN0 (43.8% vs 39.5%), and postoperative complications (45.8% vs 36.8%) between the 2 groups. ConclusionAlthough TNT did not increase the postoperative complication rate, it also did not provide any additional short-term benefits compared with PNT for clinical stage III gastric cancer.

A Retrospective Analysis of the Lauren Classification in the Choice of XELOX or SOX as an Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer.

We aim to retrospectively explore the guiding value of the Lauren classification for patients who have undergone D2 gastrectomy to choose oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (XELOX) or oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) as a further systemic treatment after the operation. We collected data of 406 patients with stage III gastric cancer(GC)after radical D2 resection and regularly received XELOX or SOX adjuvant treatment after surgery and followed them for at least five years. According to the Lauren classification, we separated patients out into intestinal type (IT) GC together with non-intestinal type(NIT) GC. According to the chemotherapy regimen, we separated patients into the SOX group together with the XELOX group. Among non-intestinal type patients, the 3-year DFS rates in the SOX group and the XELOX group were 72.5%, respectively; 54.5% (P=0.037); The 5-year OS rates were 66.8% and 51.8% respectively (P=0.038), both of which were statistically significant. The patients of non-intestinal type GC may benefit from the SOX regimen. Differences were counted without being statistically significant with intestinal-type GC in the SOX or XELOX groups.

The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is different for type 4 and large type 3 gastric cancer

BackgroundIn the JCOG0501 study, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) failed to demonstrate survival benefits for type 4 and large type 3 gastric cancer (GC). The prognosis of these patients is still poor. We conducted this study to explore the value of NAC with non-SP regimens for type 4 and large type 3 ​GC in the Chinese population. MethodsWe retrospectively collected data from our electronic medical record system. Patients with large type 3 or type 4 ​GC who underwent D2 gastrectomy and AC were included. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received NAC: the CSC (NAC ​+ ​surgery ​+ ​AC) and SC (surgery ​+ ​AC) groups. The survival and perioperative outcomes for large type 3 or type 4 ​GC were analyzed between the CSC and SC groups, separately. ResultsBetween May 2009 and December 2018, 189 patients were reviewed. Among large type 3 ​GC, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates for patients in the CSC and SC groups were 54.4 ​% and 28.0 ​%, respectively (P ​= ​0.0008). Among type 4 ​GC, the 5-year OS rates for patients in the CSC and SC groups were 15.8 ​% and 24.8 ​%, respectively (P ​> ​0.05). ConclusionsThis study showed NAC can improve the prognosis of large type 3 ​GC. However, NAC did not demonstrate significant survival advantages for type 4 ​GC.

Perioperative chemotherapy versus adjuvant chemotherapy treatment for resectable locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is increasingly used in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC), but the clinical safety and efficacy are still controversial. This study aims to compare perioperative chemotherapy (PEC) with adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for resectable LAGC.MethodsPatients who underwent D2 gastrectomy for resectable LAGC were retrospectively reviewed, and divided into NSA group (NAC plus surgery and AC) and SA group (surgery followed by AC). The baseline characteristics and perioperative data were compared. Survival analysis was based on Kaplan–Meier method. Multivariate analyses for prognostic factors were based on the Cox regression.ResultsA total of 450 patients were eligible for this study. 218 patients received NAC plus surgery and AC, while 232 upfront surgery followed by AC. The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. NSA group showed significant superiority in R0 resection rate (P = 0.014), excised tumor size (P = 0.038), and tumor downstage (all P < 0.001). NAC did not affect postoperative complications or AC-related grade 3/4 adverse events. Patients in NSA group achieved significantly longer OS (P = 0.021) and DFS (P = 0.002). The Cox regression model showed that NAC was independently associated with better OS (HR 0.245, P = 0.039) and DFS (HR 0.591, P = 0.031).ConclusionsCompared with SA, the administration of NSA was considered safe and feasible for achieving higher R0 resection rate without increasing the postoperative complications or AC-related grade 3/4 adverse events, and NAC was independently associated with better OS and DFS for resectable LAGC.

LBA78 Overall survival of perioperative or postoperative adjuvant oxaliplatin with S-1 versus adjuvant oxaliplatin with capecitabine in locally advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma undergoing D2 gastrectomy: An updated analysis of RESOLVE trial

LBA78 Overall survival of perioperative or postoperative adjuvant oxaliplatin with S-1 versus adjuvant oxaliplatin with capecitabine in locally advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma undergoing D2 gastrectomy: An updated analysis of RESOLVE trial

Five-year overall survival with S-1 plus docetaxel as adjuvant treatment in curatively resected pStage III gastric cancer in JACCRO GC-07.

4065 Background: JACCRO GC-07 is a randomized controlled trial to explore postoperative S-1/docetaxel compared to S-1 alone after D2 gastrectomy for pStage III gastric cancer (GC) patients. The second interim analysis demonstrated that the significant improvement of RFS was obtained by S-1/docetaxel compared to S-1 alone. The study was terminated by the recommendation of independent data and safety monitoring committee (Yoshida K et al. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:1296-1304). Preplanned analysis to evaluate RFS at 3 years, the primary endpoint, was also published (Kakeji Y et al. Gastric Cancer 2022; 25:186-196). We report the 5-years follow-up data from the trial. Methods: Patients with pStage III GC were randomly assigned to receive either S-1/docetaxel (S-1 80-120mg/body on days 1-14 with a 7-day rest followed by docetaxel 40mg/m2 on day 1 and S-1 80-120mg/body on days 1-14 every 21 days for 6 cycles followed by S-1 80-120mg/body on days 1-28 every 42 days for 4 cycles) or S-1 (80-120mg/body on days 1-28 every 42 days for 8 cycles) after D2 gastrectomy. Blocked randomisation was performed and stratified by the stage (IIIA, IIIB, IIIC) and histological type (differentiated or undifferentiated). The primary endpoint was 3y RFS and the secondary endpoints were OS, TTF and safety. This analysis presents the final preplanned assessment of outcomes after 5 years. Results: Of 915 randomly assigned patients, 912 patients were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. In the final analysis, 426 recurrences and 373 deaths were confirmed among the ITT population during the median follow-up period of 63.72 months (3.52-111.87). The 5y RFS of 59.8% in the S-1/docetaxel group was significantly superior to 50.6% in the S-1 group (HR 0.726, 95% CI: 0.599-0.879, p = 0.0010) and the 5y OS was 67.9% in the S-1/docetaxel group and that of S-1 group was 60.3%, respectively (HR 0.752, 95% CI: 0.613-0.922, p = 0.0059), confirming the significant improving effect on the survival of the patient. Conclusions: Adjuvant treatment with S-1 plus docetaxel should be considered for patients with pStage III gastric cancer who underwent D2 gastrectomy without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: UMIN000010337 .

Fruquintinib plus oxaliplatin combined with S-1 (SOX) as neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (FRUTINEOGA): A multicenter, phase II study.

e16063 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) has become the standard treatment for patients (pts) with locally advanced GC, and SOX is the most common neoadjuvant regimen in China. Fruquintinib is a VEGFR inhibitor that blocks new blood vessel growth associated with tumor proliferation. It is a potent, highly selective small-molecule inhibitor of VEGFR-1,-2, and -3. The generally good tolerability in pts and fruquintinib’s low potential for drug-drug interaction suggest that it may be highly suitable for combinations with other antineoplastic therapies. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of fruquintinib plus SOX as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced GC. Methods: It was a prospective, multicenter, phase II study in pts with stage III (cT3/4aN+M0) GC. Pts received 2 to 4 cycles of fruquintinib (5mg qd D1-14, Q3W) plus SOX (oxaliplatin 130mg/m2 D1, S-1 40-60mg bid D1-14 depending on body surface area (BSA), Q3W). Pts underwent D2 gastrectomy after neoadjuvant treatment. The primary endpoint was pathological response rate (pRR), and the secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), major pathological response rate (MPR), and R0 resection rate. Results: Up to February 3, 2023, 19 pts were eligible for the study. Median age was 62 years (29-73), 68.4% were male, and 21.1% were ECOG 1. Seven pts dropped out of clinical trial for AEs (2 pts), violation of treatment protocol (1 pt), staging error (2 pts), and refusal of surgery (2 pts). Twelve pts underwent surgery, 1 patient was found with peritoneal implantation, 11 patients underwent gastrectomy. Among the 11 pts, 9 pts achieved pRR (81.8%) and 3 pts achieved MPR (27.3%). The pathologic CR rate was 27.3% (3 of 11 pts). Moreover, 11 pts had curative intended operations and R0 resection rate was 90.9%. Among all the 19 pts, 16 pts received at least one dose of the combination treatment. A total of 2 pts had target lesions, 1 patient had complete response and 1 had partial response. Among the other 14 pts without target lesions, 1 (7.1%) had progressive disease with peritoneal implantation metastasis, and none had complete response. Furthermore, the most common TEAEs of grade ≥ 3 occurred in 19 pts were decreased appetite (21.1%), hypertension (21.1%), nausea (15.8%), vomiting (10.5%), oral mucositis (10.5%), fatigue (5.3%), diarrhea (5.3%) and respiratory infections (5.3%). There were neither new safety signals nor AEs inducing treatment deaths. Conclusions: The combination of fruquintinib and SOX as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with locally advanced GC is safe. The combination demonstrates promising evidence of anti-tumor efficacy in terms of pathological response. Clinical trial information: NCT05122091 .

Efficacy and safety of XELOX combined with anlotinib and penpulimab vs XELOX as adjuvant therapy in ctDNA-positive gastric and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: A protocol for a randomized, controlled, multicenter phase II clinical trial—EXPLORING study.

TPS486 Background: The clinical benefit of current postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric adenocarcinoma/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GA/GEJA) leaves much to be desired. CtDNA could serve as a potential marker to identify patients (pts) who are most at risk of recurrence. Reinforcing standard adjuvant chemotherapy with immunotherapy has already been indicated to significantly boost clinical benefit, albeit such evidence is rare in GA/GEJA. Here, we intend to prove the clinical benefit of the reinforcement of adjuvant chemotherapy with immunotherapy in patients who are deemed high risk of recurrence by ctDNA analysis, in hope of shedding light on further improvements in adjuvant therapy for GA/GEJA. Methods: This study is designed as a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter phase II study in patients histologically or cytologically diagnosed with CG/GEJC (Siewert III), 18-75 years, ECOG PS 0-1, underwent D2 gastrectomy and achieved R0 or R1 resection. Beginning from February 2022, a total of 270 stage III patients will be enrolled and subjected to ctDNA sequencing, and those with positive results will subsequently be randomized 1:1 to arm A or B. CtDNA-negative patients will be assigned to arm C and pts who had ctDNA positive but failed to be randomized will be assigned to arm D. Pts in arm A will receive anlotinib, penpulimab and XELOX for 6-8 cycles, maintained with anlotinib and penpulimab for up to 1 year, while pts in arm B will receive XELOX alone for 6-8 cycles. Pts in arms C&amp;D will receive the investigator’s choice of therapy. Arms A&amp;B will be monitored for ctDNA levels on a 3-month cycle for 1 year. Survival data, laboratory findings, imaging reports and nutritional status will be regularly followed-up in all arms. The primary endpoint is the median disease-free survival (DFS) of arm A versus arm B determined via CT/MRI imaging. Secondary endpoints include the median DFS of arm B versus arm C, the 2- and 3-year DFS rates, overall survival (OS), the impact of hallmark molecules (presumably ctDNA) on the treatment response, adverse events (AEs), and the impact of nutrition status and exercise on recurrence. Clinical trial information: NCT05494060 .

PERSIST: A multicenter, randomized phase II trial of perioperative oxaliplatin and S-1 (SOX) with or without sintilimab in resectable locally advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC).

364 Background: RESOLVE study shows clinically meaningful improvement in perioperative SOX in patients with locally advanced GC/GEJC undergoing D2 gastrectomy. Addition of PD-1 inhibitor to chemotherapy shows significant clinical benefit in first-line treatment of advanced GC/GEJC. This trial was designed to compare the perioperative sintilimab combined with SOX versus perioperative SOX in patients with resectable locally advanced GC/GEJC. Methods: PERSIST is a multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized-controlled phase II study. Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed GC/GEJC, clinical stage II-III, no previous systemic treatment, ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 or 1 were eligible for inclusion. Patients will be randomized (1:1) to received either perioperative sintilimab (200 mg d1 Q3W, three cycles preoperatively and up to 1 year postoperatively) in combined with SOX (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m² d1, oral S-1 40–60 mg BID d1-14 Q3W, three cycles preoperatively and five cycles postoperatively) in experimental group or perioperative SOX alone in control group. The primary endpoint was the pCR rate. The secondary endpoints were the MPR rate, down-staging rate, 3-years DFS rate, 5-years OS rate, safety. The study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04982939. Results: As of September 2022, 101 patients were enrolled, with median age 61 years (range 31-75 years), males 85 (84.2%), cT2/3/4/X 2(2.0%)/5(5.0%)/93(92.1%)/1(1.0%), cN0/1/2/3/X 10(10.0%)/42(41.6%)/27(26.7%)/9(8.9%)/13(12.9%), and GC/GEJC 92(91.1%)/9(8.9%). Forty-seven patients (experimental group:26, control group:21) underwent radical resection and all achieved R0 resection. The pCR rates in the experimental group and control group were 26.9% (95%CI 11.6%-47.8%) and 4.8% (95%CI 0.1%-23.8%), respectively. The MPR rates in the experimental group and control group were 69.2% (95%CI 48.2%-85.7%) and 28.6% (95%CI 11.3%-52.2%), respectively. 76.9% (20/26) and 52.4% (11/21) patients achieved down-staging in the experimental group and control group. Three patients developed grade 3–4 surgical complications. Grade 3–4 TRAEs included thrombocytopenia (4.0%), anemia (3.0%), neutropenia (2.0%), allergic reaction (2.0%), pneumonia (1.0%), myocardial infarction (1.0%). The median postoperative hospital stay in the experimental and control group were 10 days (range 7-38 days) and 11 days (range 7-66 days). Conclusions: Compared to SOX chemotherapy alone, sintilimab combined with SOX resulted in an encouraging pCR rate, MPR rate and downstaging rate as perioperative treatment for resectable locally advanced GC/GEJC, and safety was manageable. Clinical trial information: NCT04982939 .

Sarcopenia is Associated with Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing D2 Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Sarcopenia is Associated with Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing D2 Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Is No. 12a Lymph Node Dissection Compliance Necessary in Patients Who Undergo D2 Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinomas? A Population-Based Retrospective Propensity Score Matching Study.

LN dissection is essential for accurately staging and improving GC patient prognosis. However, the compliance rate for No. 12a LND in practice is low, and its necessity is controversial. Data from GC patients who underwent total gastrectomy (TG)/distal gastrectomy (DG) plus D2 lymphadenectomy between January 2000 and December 2017 at West China Hospital, Sichuan University were reviewed. No. 12a LND noncompliance's effect on the long-term prognosis of patients with GC after D2 gastrectomy was explored. Of the 2788 patients included, No. 12a LND noncompliance occurred in 1753 patients (62.9%). Among 1035 patients with assessable LNs from station 12a, 98 (9.5%) had positive LNs detected at station 12a. No. 12a LN metastasis patients (stage IV not included) had significantly better overall survival (OS) than TNM stage IV patients (p = 0.006). Patients with No. 12a LND compliance had a significantly higher OS than those without, both before (p < 0.001) and after (p < 0.001) PSM. Cox multivariate analysis confirmed that No. 12a LND noncompliance was an independent prognostic factor before (HR 1.323, 95% CI 1.171-1.496, p < 0.001) and after (HR 1.353, 95% CI 1.173-1.560, p < 0.001) PSM. In conclusion, noncompliance with No. 12a LND compromised the long-term survival of patients who underwent D2 gastrectomy for GC.

Evaluation of systemic inflammatory and nutritional indexes in locally advanced gastric cancer treated with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after D2 dissection.

Many studies have shown that the peripheral blood inflammatory index and nutritional index, such as the platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte monocyte ratio (LMR), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and prognostic nutrition index (PNI), are independent prognostic factors for tumors. The present study aimed to investigate the prognostic role of these peripheral blood indexes before treatment in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) treated with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after D2 dissection. A total of 89 patients with LAGC who underwent D2 gastrectomy and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy at our hospital from 2010-2018 were eligible. Systemic inflammatory indicators before treatment were evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox regression were utilized for prognosis evaluation. The median follow-up time was 29.1 (4.1-115.8) months. The overall survival at 3 years (OS) and the disease-free survival (DFS) were 78.9% and 59.1%, respectively. According to the ROC curve for 3-year DFS, the best cut-off values of pre-treatment NLR, PLR, LMR, SII, SIRI, PIV and PNI were 1.7, 109.3, 2.9, 369.2, 0.58, 218.7, and 48, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that NLR was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (HR 2.991, 95%CI 1.085-8.248, P = 0.034). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that a higher NLR (>1.70) was significantly associated with a poorer OS (3-year OS: 68.8% vs 92.9%, P = 0.045) and DFS (3-year DFS: 47.5% vs 80.9%, P = 0.005). In terms of the free locoregional recurrence rate (LRR), the prognosis of patients with high NLR was also significantly worse than those with low NLR (70.2% vs 96.0%, P = 0.017). Paraaortic lymph nodes were the most common site of LRR (7/14 patients). The seven cases of paraaortic lymph node metastasis occurred in patients with high NLR. In our retrospective analysis, we found that pretreatment NLR could serve as a prognostic factor for survival in LAGC treated with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after D2 dissection, especially for the prediction of LRR and paraaortic lymph node metastasis. Prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Positive Phospho-Focal Adhesion Kinase in Gastric Cancer Associates With Poor Prognosis After Curative Resection.

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most commonly diagnosed cancer and usually has a dismal prognosis. Our previous study highlights the contribution of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) in the tumorigenesis of diffuse gastric cancer (DGC), a subtype of GC according to Lauren classification. The prognostic value of phosphorylated FAK (pFAK) in GC remains to be explored. To explore the prognostic value of pFAK, we retrospectively collected 176 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues from GC patients who underwent D2 gastrectomy without neoadjuvant treatment. The immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of pFAK was performed. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan–Meier and risk factors were evaluated by Cox regression analysis. A pFAK-based nomogram was also constructed for the prediction of overall survival (OS). We demonstrated that the prognosis of pFAK-positive patients was worse than that of the pFAK-negative patients in GC (p = 0.010; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.777, 95% CI 1.131 to 2.791; median OS, 46.6 vs. 86.3 months, respectively), and positive pFAK was also an independent risk factor for the worse prognosis of GC (p = 0.0054; HR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.21–2.96). Moreover, the nomogram based on pFAK and other independent risk factors could improve predictive accuracy for prognosis of GC. In conclusion, through analysis of a large collection of clinically annotated GC samples, we demonstrate that pFAK is a negative prognostic factor in GC, and a nomogram integrating pFAK could help predict OS for GC patients.

Perioperative chemotherapy with docetaxel plus oxaliplatin and S-1 (DOS) versus oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) for locally advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma (MATCH): An open-label, randomized, phase 2 study.

4031 Background: The optimal perioperative chemotherapy of locally advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer has not been established in Asia, though FLOT was considered as standard therapy in Europe. Therefore, we aimed to assess efficacy and safety of DOS versus SOX as perioperative treatment in patients with locally advanced G/GEJ cancer in this study. Methods: This was a single center, open-label, randomized, phase 2 study. Eligible pts were aged ≥18 years with histologically diagnosed HER2 negative cT3-4 Nany M0 G/GEJ (Siewert II/III type) adenocarcinoma. Pts were randomized (1:1) to receive either 4 preoperative and 4 postoperative cycles of DOS (docetaxel 60mg/m2 D1, oxaliplatin 100mg/m2 D1, S-1 40-60mg bid D1-14 depending on body surface area (BSA), Q3W) or SOX (oxaliplatin 130mg/m2 D1, S-1 40-60mg bid D1-14 depending on BSA, Q3W). Pts underwent D2 gastrectomy after preoperative treatment. The primary endpoint was major pathological response (MPR) analyzed in the modified intention to treat (mITT) population according to Becker TRG criteria. Secondary endpoints included the 3-year progression free survival (PFS), the 3-year overall survival (OS), pathological complete response, R0 resection rate and safety. Results: From Aug, 2015, to Dec, 2019, 154 pts were enrolled, 7 pts withdrew consent, 147 pts were included as mITT population (DOS 71; SOX 76). 80.3% and 67.1% of the pts in the DOS and SOX groups accepted surgery respectively. More pts achieved MPR (25.4% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.035) and R0 resection (78.9% vs. 61.8%, p = 0.024) in the DOS group than the SOX group. With a median follow-up of 42.4 months, the 3-year PFS and the 3-year OS were 52.3% vs. 35% (p = 0.065, HR 0.667, 95%CI 0.432-1.029) and 57.5% vs. 49.2% (p = 0.114, HR 0.685, 95%CI 0.429-1.095) in the DOS and SOX groups, respectively. Pts who acquired MPR had a significant longer survival than non-MPR pts. The 3-year PFS were 89.4% vs. 38.6% (p &lt; 0.001, HR 0.076, 95%CI 0.018-0.314). The 3-year OS were 100% vs. 50.1% (p = 0.008, HR 0.024, 95%CI 0.002-0.371). 56.1% and 60.8% of the pts completed at least 6 cycles of the perioperative chemotherapy in the DOS and SOX groups, respectively (p = 0.625). The most common grade ≥3 TRAEs included neutropenia (8.5% vs.10.5%), leucopenia (1.4% vs. 5.3%), thrombocytopenia (1.4% vs 15.8%, p = 0.002), anemia (1.4% vs. 3.9%) and diarrhea (1.4% vs. 2.6%). The incidence of grade 1-2 thrombocytopenia was also significant lower in the DOS group (15.5% vs. 31.6%, p = 0.022). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: Perioperative DOS improved MPR significantly and tended to have better PFS compared with SOX in locally advanced G/GEJ cancer, might be regarded as a prefered option of perioperative chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02725424.

Oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOX) plus toripalimab as perioperative treatment for locally advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma (Neo-Capture): A single-arm, phase 2 study.

e16001 Background: PD-1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy showed remarkable objective response rate in the first line treatment of metastatic gastric cancer. While, the benefit of perioperative PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer was not clear. Therefore, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of perioperative XELOX plus toripalimab in the patients with locally advanced G/GEJ cancer in this study. Methods: This was a prospective single arm phase 2 study. Eligible patients were with histologically confirmed locally advanced G/GEJ (Siewert II/II type) adenocarcinoma (cT3-4 Nany M0 or T1-2 N2-3 M0). Patients received 4 preoperative and 2 postoperative cycles of XELOX plus toripalimab (oxaliplatin 130mg/m2 D1, capecitabine 1000mg/m2 bid D1-14, toripalimab 240mg D1, Q3W) followed by subsequent 2 cycles of toripalimab monotherapy. Patients underwent D2 gastrectomy after preoperative treatment. The primary endpoint was major pathological response (MPR) according to Becker TRG criteria. Secondary endpoints included safety, R0 resection rate, pathological complete response (pCR), 3-year disease free survival (DFS) and 3-year overall survival (OS). Results: From Jul, 2019, to Dec, 2021, 35 pts were recruited. The median age was 61 (34-72) years old. 80% of the pts were men. Acutally, all the pts had cT4 (cT4a [48.6%] &amp; cT4b [51.4%]) and 88.6% had cN+ by CT, MRI and ultrasound gastroscopy. 2 pts suffered disease progression during neoadjuvant treatment. 4 pts have not yet completed preoperative therapy. 29 pts had received gastrectomy and 2 pts were pathologically diagnosed with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Therefore, 27 adenocarcinoma pts were included in this analysis. 3 (11.1%) pts achieved pCR (TRG1a) and 4 (14.8%) pts achieved MPR (TRG1a/b). R0 resection was achieved in 96.3% (26/27) of the pts. No patient had pT4b. The most common (≥10%) grade 1-2 treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) included leucopenia (45.7%), neutropenia (42.9%), thrombocytopenia (20%), nausea (34.1%), vomiting (14.3%), anorexia (14.3%), ALT increased (40%) and AST increased (34.3%). Only 4 (11.4%) pts experienced grade 3 neutropenia. No other ≥ grade 3 TRAEs occurred. Most of the potential immune-related adverse events were grade 1-2 including hypothyroidism (8.6%), adrenal insufficiency (2.9%) and hyperglycemia (11.4%). Only one (2.9%) patient had grade 3 hyperglycemia. No serious perioperative complication and death occurred. Conclusions: Perioperative XELOX plus toripalimab preliminarily showed a favorable R0 resection rate and acceptable MPR in cT4a/T4b locally advanced G/GEJ cancer patients with a manageable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT04119622.

Adjuvant chemotherapy after curative D2 gastrectomy in Latin American patients with gastric cancer.

BackgroundGastric cancer (GC) is the fourth most common cause of cancer deaths around the world and the first cause of cancer deaths in Peru; however, there are no prospective trials for adjuvant chemotherapy in GC after curative gastrectomy in this country. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II–III gastric cancer patients who underwent D2 gastrectomy.MethodsWe included patients with stage II–III gastric cancer who underwent radical gastrectomy and D2 dissection between 2014 and 2016 at our institution. Patients received 3-week cycles of capecitabine (1,000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–14) plus oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2 on day 1) for 6 months. Survival curves were estimated with the Kaplan–Meier method, and the Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify prognostic factors for survival.ResultsIn total, 173 patients were included: 100 (57.8%) patients received adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery (AChS) and 73 (42.2%) surgery alone (SA). Three-year disease-free survival (DFS) was higher in the AChS groups (69%) than in the SA group (52.6%) (p = 0.034). Regarding overall survival (OS), 31 patients (31%) died in the AChS group compared with 34 (46.6%) in the SA group (p = 0.027). In the multivariate analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (HR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.37–0.97; p = 0.036) and OS (HR = 0.58; 95% CI = 0.36–0.95; p = 0.029). ACh showed consistent benefit in DFS and OS for patients with albumin >3.5 g/dL, lymphovascular and perineural invasion, pT4, pN2–3, pathologic stage (PS) IIIA and IIIB and lymph node ratio (LNR) > 13.1.ConclusionThese data suggest that adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin reduce the recurrence and mortality in patients with stage II–III gastric cancer who underwent D2 gastrectomy. PS IIIA and IIIB and LNR > 13.1 benefited more from receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and poorly cohesive gastric carcinoma did not significantly reduce the rates of survival.

105: SURGICAL DISSECTION DOES NOT INCREASE FREE CANCER CELLS (FCC) IN PERITONEAL LAVAGE OF PATIENTS FOLLOWING D2 GASTRECTOMY

Abstract Background and aim Peritoneal free cancer cells (FCC) in patients with gastric cancer (GC) is poor prognostic factor. D2 gastrectomy dissection may induce exfoliated FCC spread from primary tumour or involved lymph nodes (LN). Conventional cytology for FCC detection has several limitations, and prophylactic use of extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage (IPL) does not improve survival. A prospective single-arm observational study was conducted to verify whether D2 gastrectomy causes an increase of FCC in peritoneal lavage as in patients with GC following D2 gastrectomy. Methods Thirty GC patients underwent D2 gastrectomy, followed by objective quantitative measurements of CK19 mRNA level reflecting FCC with One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) assay. The IPL with 3000 cc of saline was performed twice after: (1) gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy; and (2) alimentary tract reconstruction. The IPL samples were analysed by initial cytology and four (1–4) consecutive OSNA assays (Figure 1). Three patients were excluded due to positive cytology in samples obtained after laparotomy. Results Initial OSNA measurement (1) revealed positive results (≥24.6 cCP/μl) in 7 (29.6%) patients. Subsequent OSNA measurements revealed a significant decrease in the FCC level after removal of the primary tumour with regional LNs (D2 gastrectomy) (1 vs 2; medians [95%CI]: 4.6 [1.1–18.5] vs. 0.00004 [0–0.2] cCP/μl; P = 0.0012). The first IPL induced non-significant increase in the FCCs (2 vs 3, medians [95%CI]: 0.00004 [0–0.2] vs 0 [0–0.5] cCP/μl; P = 0.3300), but the second IPL reversed it to normal levels (3 vs 4, medians [95%CI]: 0 [0–0.5] vs 0 [0–0] cCP/μl; P = 0.0.0574). At this point of operation, additional finding was a trend toward temporal increase of FCC in patients with LN involvement (pN1–3)(2 vs 3; medians [95%CI]: 0 [0–0.2] vs 0 [0–42.8] cCP/μl; P = 0.0674). One patient was still positive (FCC) at the end of operation as measured by OSNA (4). Conclusion D2 Gastrectomy does not induce increase in the peritoneal FCCs. Temporal intraoperative increase in peritoneal FCC after the IPL may be observed, especially in tumours with LN metastases. At least two consecutive IPLs (with min. 3000 mL of saline) are necessary to reverse temporal increase of peritoneal FCC.

Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer Undergoing Perioperative or Postoperative Adjuvant S-1 Plus Oxaliplatin With D2 Gastrectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.

BackgroundSome high-quality clinical trials have proven the efficacy and safety of perioperative and postoperative S-1 with oxaliplatin (peri-SOX and post-SOX) for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) undergoing D2 gastrectomy. However, little is known about how health-related quality of life (HRQOL) changes over time in patients receiving peri-SOX or post-SOX chemotherapy.MethodsA prospective observational cohort (NCT04408859) identified 151 eligible patients with LAGC who underwent D2 gastrectomy with at least six cycles of peri-SOX or post-SOX chemotherapy from 2018 to 2020. HRQOL was assessed using the EROTC QLQ-C30 and its gastric module, QLQ-STO22, at indicated measurements, including the baseline, 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th month after initiation of therapy. Baseline characteristics, therapeutic effects, and longitudinal HRQOL were compared between the peri-SOX and post-SOX groups after propensity score matching. HRQOL changes over time and the risk factors for scales with severe deterioration were further analyzed.ResultsNo statistically significant differences in longitudinal HRQOL were observed between patients in the peri-SOX and post-SOX groups, with comparable surgical outcomes and adverse chemotherapy events. Scales of social functioning, abnormal taste, and anxiety improved earlier in the peri-SOX group than in the post-SOX group. Score changes in both groups indicated that general deterioration and slower recovery usually occurred in the scales of physical, social, and role functioning, as well as symptoms of fatigue, reflux, diarrhea, and anxiety.ConclusionPeri-SOX showed a longitudinal HRQOL comparable to post-SOX in patients with LAGC who underwent D2 gastrectomy. The peri-SOX group had better performance in social functioning, abnormal taste, and anxiety at some measurements.

Molecular Cytology by One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) Assay of Peritoneal Washings during D2 Gastrectomy in Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients: Preliminary Results.

The presence of peritoneal free cancer cells (FCC) in gastric cancer (GC) patients is a poor prognostic factor. D2 gastrectomy may induce exfoliated FCC spread from the primary tumour or involved lymph nodes (LN). Conventional cytology for FCC detection has several limitations, whereas prophylactic use of extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage (IPL) does not improve survival. A prospective single-arm observational study was conducted to verify whether D2 gastrectomy causes an intraoperative increase of FCC in peritoneal fluid. Twenty-seven GC patients underwent D2 gastrectomy, followed by objective quantitative measurements of CK19 mRNA level reflecting FCC with One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) assay. The IPL with 3000 mL of saline was performed twice: (1) after gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy and (2) after alimentary tract reconstruction. The IPL samples were analysed by initial cytology and four (1–4) consecutive OSNA assays. Initial OSNA measurement (1) revealed positive results (≥24.6 cCP/μL) in 7 (29.6%) patients. Subsequent OSNA measurements showed a significant decrease in the FCC level after D2 gastrectomy (1 vs. 2; p = 0.0012). The first IPL induced a non-significant increase in the FCCs (2 vs. 3, p = 0.3300), but the second IPL reversed it to normal levels (3 vs. 4, p = 0.0.0574). The OSNA assay indicates a temporal intraoperative increase in the peritoneal FCC in advanced GC patients undergoing D2 gastrectomy. Two consecutive IPLs are necessary to reverse the increase of CK19 mRNA level in peritoneal washings.

Phase II feasibility study of adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel/cisplatin/S-1 followed by S-1 for stage III gastric cancer

BackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel/cisplatin/S-1 (DCS) following S-1 therapy in patients with stage III gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy.MethodsPatients with stage III gastric cancer who underwent D2 gastrectomy were enrolled. Adjuvant chemotherapy was initiated within 8 weeks of gastrectomy. The first cycle of chemotherapy consisted of S-1 monotherapy (day 1–14), followed by a 7-day rest period. Cycles 2 and 3 consisted of the following: S-1 (day 1–14) administration, followed by a 14-day rest period, and an intravenous infusion of cisplatin and docetaxel on days 1 and 15. After two cycles, S-1 was administered for up to 1 year.ResultsThirty patients were enrolled between 2014 and 2017. Febrile neutropenia of grade 3 or higher was the most common hematological toxicity with 4 patients (13.3%). Other hematological toxicities of grade 3 or higher were as follows: neutropenia in 3 (10.0%), leukopenia in 3 (10.0%), and anemia in 2 (6.7%) patients. Most frequent non-hematological toxicity of grade 3 was anorexia (n = 4, 13.3%) and general fatigue (n = 3, 10.0%); no grade 4 non-hematological toxicities were observed. Twenty-five patients (83.3%) completed two cycles of DCS treatment and 18 (60.0%) completed subsequent S-1 treatment for 1 year. The relative dose intensity of docetaxel and cisplatin was 0.86 and that of S-1 was 0.88.ConclusionThe DCS regimen can be acceptable as an adjuvant chemotherapy and offers an effective postoperative treatment option for stage III gastric cancer patients.Trial registration numberUMIN000012785.Date of registry08/01/2014.