Underwent Liver Resection Research Articles

MUCINOUS CYSTIC NEOPLASM OF LIVER - PEELING SIGN MITIGATES A DIAGNOSTIC CONUNDRUM

Background: Mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN) are rare primary cystic neoplasms of the liver. It is commonly misdiagnosed for other cystic SOLs of liver. Clinical management of MCN is challenging due to scant literature on pre-operative and per-operative indices to distinguish MCN from other cystic SOLs of liver. Imprecise diagnosis leading to suboptimal surgical management results in recurrence and progression to malignancy. Methods: A retrospective analysis of cystic SOLs from July 2019 to July 2023 was analyzed in our centre. Data collection included demographics, clinical presentations, imaging characteristics, surgical techniques, intra-operative observations, complications, histopathology, post-operative follow-up, morbidity, and mortality. Results:Between July 2019 and July 2023, six patients were diagnosed and treated for MCN at our centre. Female patients were predominant (5 out of 6) with average age of 45.5yrs (Range 26-53). Abdominal discomfort was the commonest symptom (50%). All patients underwent abdominal ultrasounds and CT scans, while MRI was done in one patient. Two were misdiagnosed with non-neoplastic liver cysts and one had an ambiguous diagnosis. Four patients underwent liver resection and two had enucleation. All were MCN by HPE. In 3 patients, with ambiguous pre-op diagnosis, our recommended pre-operative and per-operative strategy including THE PEELING SIGN was helpful in diagnosing MCN. No recurrences were observed at 43 months of follow up. Conclusions:Liver MCNs are infrequent and often mistaken for other hepatic cystic conditions. By applying our pre-operative and per-operative indices, patients with MCN of liver can be diagnosed with precision and offered radical surgery.

Predictive Value of Preoperative ICG-R15 Testing in Post-hepatectomy Liver Failure Following Major Liver Resection: Indian Experience.

Surgical resection stands as the preeminent therapeutic approach for both primary hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic liver malignancies. Its efficacy is contingent upon the attainment of a comprehensive excision while ensuring a sufficient future liver remnant (FLR). However, post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) remains a significant challenge, particularly in patients with preexisting liver disease. The present study aims to investigate the predictive value of the preoperative indocyanine green retention test at 15min (ICG-R15) in identifying patients at risk of PHLF following major liver resection. This retrospective review focused on patients who underwent the ICG-R15 test before major liver resection between August 2021 and January 2023. All patients underwent standard preoperative evaluation and staging. Patients with primary or metastatic liver cancer planned for major resection and undergoing ICG-R15 were included in the study. Patients with elevated serum bilirubin (> 3mg/dl) and those not undergoing liver resection or minor liver resection (< 3 segments) were excluded from the study. PHLF was defined by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS) criteria. Follow-up was performed to identify 90-day morbidity. Using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, we confirmed independent risk parameters that predicted postoperative major complications and severe PHLF. The study included 72 patients who underwent preoperative ICG-R15 testing prior to major liver resection. PHLF occurred in 28 patients (38.9%), with 24 patients (33.3%) classified as severity score B and 3 patients (4.16%) had severity score C. Univariate analysis revealed future liver remnant (FLR), ICG-R15, and blood transfusion as predictors of PHLF. Multivariate analysis confirmed FLR (p = 0.019) and ICG-R15 (p = 0.032) as significant predictors. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis yielded an area under the curve of 0.642 for ICG-R15 in predicting PHLF. An optimal cut-point of 7.5 was determined. Our study highlights the importance of preoperative risk assessment of liver function evaluation using the ICG-R15 test, to predict the risk of PHLF following liver resection. Implementing appropriate interventions, especially in patients with borderline FLR, can improve surgical outcomes and enhance patient safety. Further research and prospective studies are essential to refine risk prediction models and improve rates of PHLF after liver resections.

Survival and progression-free survival in patients undergoing curative resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

562 Background: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a relatively rare but increasingly prevalent form of primary liver cancer. Surgical resection with negative margins is the mainstay of the treatment for patients with resectable-iCCA. However, given the rarity of iCCA and its low resectability rate, well-defined prognostic markers and outcomes for patients undergoing curative hepatectomy are lacking. We aimed to analyze the characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing liver resection for iCCA. Methods: All consecutive patients with confirmed iCCA who underwent hepatectomy between 7/2006-3/2023 at our institution were included. Patients who received neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. Demographic, clinical, radiological, histopathological, recurrence, and survival data were collected. Overall survival was calculated from the date of liver resection to the date of death or last clinical encounter. Continuous variables are reported as median and interquartile range (IQR) 1 and IQR3, and categorical variables as counts and percentages. Results: A total of 83 patients (43 male, 40 female) were included in the final analysis. The median age at resection was 67 years (58.0-74.0). Histologically proven liver disease was present in 30.12% and liver cirrhosis was present in 9.63% of patients. Among all patients, hypertension was present in 61.44%, diabetes mellitus in 25.30%, inflammatory bowel disease in 7.22%. The median tumor size was 4.4 cm (3.0-6.2). Tumor histologic grade was 55.42% moderately differentiated tumor, 37.3% poorly differentiated tumor, and 7.22% well differentiated tumor. Of all patients, 37.66% had lymph node invasion, 35.61% had perineural invasion, and 30.76% had vascular invasion on liver histology. Positive surgical margins were present in 20.73% of patients. The duration from liver resection to the last follow-up or death was 1.6 years (0.80-3.20). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 72.78, 34.95, and 15.88% respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 90.9%, 65.9, 44.2%, respectively. Advanced iCCA stage at diagnosis ( p&lt;0.001), presence of lymph node metastasis ( p=0.03), vascular invasion ( p=0.02), and age&lt;50 ( p=0.01) were associated with significantly worse overall survival. There was no statistically significant survival difference between patients with concurrent liver disease and those without (6.88 vs 4.35 years, p=0.46.). Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that iCCA carries a substantial risk of recurrence despite curative resection. The presence of advanced stage at diagnosis, lymph node involvement, vascular invasion, and age&lt;50 were associated with significantly worse overall survival. Liver disease had no significant effect on the survival outcomes. Predictive markers of recurrence and survival in patients vary in the literature and remain to be validated.

Laparoscopic anatomic vs. nonanatomic liver resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma (≥5 cm) in the right lobe

ObjectiveTo determine the impacts and outcomes of laparoscopic anatomic liver resection (LAR) and laparoscopic nonanatomic resection (LNAR) in patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the right lobe of the liver. BackgroundThere are few comparative studies of LAR and LNAR for large HCC. MethodThree hundred thirty-seven patients underwent liver resection for large HCC (≥5 cm) at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, Korea, between January 2004 and December 2022. After the exclusion of patients treated with open hepatic resection and those who had left-lobe or bilobar tumors, 94 patients were ultimately included. Patients were divided into LAR group (61 patients) and LNAR group (33 patients). After propensity score matching (PSM) with 1:1 matching, 31 patients were included in each group. The outcomes in the two groups were compared. ResultsLAR group had longer operative time than LNAR group (333.7 ± 113.7 vs 210 ± 117.6 min, respectively, P < 0.001), wider safety margin (1.4 ± 1.5 vs 0.7 ± 0.7 cm, respectively, P = 0.015), and lower incidence of recurrence (25.8% vs. 54.8%, respectively, P = 0.021). ConclusionLAR required longer operative time, achieved wider safety margin, and had lower incidence of recurrence than LNAR.

Benchmarks in Liver Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

IntroductionBenchmarking in surgery has been proposed as a means to compare results across institutions to establish best practices. We sought to define benchmark values for hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) across an international population.MethodsPatients who underwent liver resection for ICC between 1990 and 2020 were identified from an international database, including 14 Eastern and Western institutions. Patients operated on at high-volume centers who had no preoperative jaundice, ASA class <3, body mass index <35 km/m2, without need for bile duct or vascular resection were chosen as the benchmark group.ResultsAmong 1193 patients who underwent curative-intent hepatectomy for ICC, 600 (50.3%) were included in the benchmark group. Among benchmark patients, median age was 58.0 years (interquartile range [IQR] 49.0–67.0), only 28 (4.7%) patients received neoadjuvant therapy, and most patients had a minor resection (n = 499, 83.2%). Benchmark values included ≥3 lymph nodes retrieved when lymphadenectomy was performed, blood loss ≤600 mL, perioperative blood transfusion rate ≤42.9%, and operative time ≤339 min. The postoperative benchmark values included TOO achievement ≥59.3%, positive resection margin ≤27.5%, 30-day readmission ≤3.6%, Clavien-Dindo III or more complications ≤14.3%, and 90-day mortality ≤4.8%, as well as hospital stay ≤14 days.ConclusionsBenchmark cutoffs targeting short-term perioperative outcomes can help to facilitate comparisons across hospitals performing liver resection for ICC, assess inter-institutional variation, and identify the highest-performing centers to improve surgical and oncologic outcomes.

Comparative study of operative expenses: robotic vs. laparoscopic vs. open liver resections at a university hospital in the UK.

Robotic liver resections (RLR) are increasingly being performed and has previously been considered more costly. The aim is to explore the cost of RLR compared with laparoscopic and open liver resection in a single National Health Service (NHS) hospital. A retrospective review of patients who underwent RLR, LLR, and OLR from April 2014 to December 2022 was conducted. The primary outcomes were the cost of consumables and median income, and the secondary outcomes were the overall length of stay and mortality at 90days. Overall, 332 patients underwent liver resections. There were 204 males (61.4%) and 128 females (38.6%), with a median age of 62years (IQR: 51-77years). Of these, 60 patients (18.1%) underwent RLR, 21 patients (6.3%) underwent LLR, and 251 patients (75.6%) underwent OLR. Median consumables cost per case was £3863 (IQR: £3458-£5061) for RLR, £4326 (IQR: £4273-£4473) for LLR, and £4,084 (IQR: £3799-£5549) for the OLR cohort (p = 0.140). Median income per case was £7999 (IQR: £4509-£10,777) for RLR, £7497 (IQR: £2407-£14,576) for LLR, and £7493 (IQR: £2542-£14,121) for OLR. The median length of stay (LOS) for RLR was 3days (IQR: 2-4.7days) compared to 5days for LLR (IQR: 4.5-7days) and 6days for OLR (IQR: 5-8days, p < 0.001). Within the NHS, RLR has consumable costs comparable to OLR and LLR. It is also linked with a shorter LOS and generates similar income for patients undergoing OLR and LLR.

Prognostic significance of socioeconomic deprivation in patients with colorectal liver metastasis undergoing liver resection: a retrospective cohort study.

To evaluate the effect of socioeconomic deprivation on overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). The STROCSS guideline for observational studies was followed to conduct a single-centre retrospective cohort study. All consecutive patients undergoing resection of CRLM between 2013 and 2021 were considered eligible for inclusion. The Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation (WIMD) rank was used to determine socioeconomic deprivation status of each patient. Prognostic significance of socioeconomic deprivation was determined by Kaplan-Meier survival statistics and stepwise Cox proportional-hazards regression model. A total of 455 patients were eligible for inclusion; 237 patients were classed as least socioeconomically deprived and 218 patients as most socioeconomically deprived. Kaplan-Meier survival statistics showed that socioeconomic deprivation was associated with significantly lower probability of overall survival (HR: 1.55, 95% CI 1.23-1.95; logrank test: P = 0.0001). The stepwise Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis identified socioeconomic deprivation as predictor of OS (HR: 1.56, P = 0.0003) alongside the following variables: ASA status 1 (HR: 0.43, P = 0.0349), presence of extrahepatic disease (HR: 1.51, P = 0.0075), number of tumours (HR: 1.07, P = 0.0221), size of largest tumour (HR: 1.01, P = 0.0003), extended hemihepatectomy (HR: 3.24, P = 0.0018) and absence of recurrence (HR: 0.55, P < 0.0001). Socioeconomic deprivation reduces the probability of long-term overall survival following liver resection in patients with CRLM. This should be taken into account at different levels of health care planning for management of patients with CRLM including preoperative risk assessment, health care need assessment and allocation of resources.

Impact of Tumor Subclassifications for Identifying an Appropriate Surgical Strategy in Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is subclassified into small and large duct types. The impact of these subclassifications for identifying appropriate surgical strategies remains unclear. This study included 118 patients with ICC who underwent liver resection. Based on the pathological examination results, the participants were divided into the small duct-type ICC group (n = 64) and large duct-type ICC group (n = 54). The clinicopathological features and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups to investigate the impact of subclassification for selecting appropriate surgical strategies. Ten patients in the small duct-type ICC group had synchronous or metachronous hepatocellular carcinoma. The large duct-type ICC group had higher proportions of patients who underwent major hepatectomy, extrahepatic bile duct resection, portal vein resection, and lymph node sampling or dissection than the small duct-type ICC group. The large duct-type ICC group had significantly higher incidences of lymph node metastasis/recurrence and pathological major vessel invasion than the other. The small duct-type ICC group exhibited significantly higher recurrence-free and overall survival rates than the large duct-type ICC group. Further, the large duct-type ICC group had a significantly higher incidence of lymph node metastasis/recurrence than the small duct-type ICC at the perihilar region group. Suitable surgical strategies may differ between the small and large duct-type ICCs. In patients with large duct-type ICCs, hepatectomy with lymph node dissection and/or biliary reconstruction should be considered, whereas hepatectomy without these advanced procedures can be suggested for patients with small duct-type ICCs.

Intramucosal Extent as a Marker for Advanced Disease and Survival in Gallbladder Adenocarcinoma.

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the most common biliary tract malignancy and has a poor prognosis. The clinical significance of focal vs diffuse GBC remains unclear. A retrospective review was conducted on all patients with non-metastatic GBC at a quaternary care center. Pathology was reviewed, and gallbladder cancer pattern was defined based on the extent of mucosal involvement; "diffuse" if the tumor was multicentric or "focal" if the tumor was only in a single location. Patients undergoing liver resection and portal lymphadenectomy were considered to have definitive surgery. The primary outcome was overall survival and assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves. 63 patients met study criteria with 32 (50.7%) having diffuse cancer. No difference was observed in utilization of definitive surgery between the groups (14 [43.8%] with focal and 12 [38.7%] with diffuse, P = .88). Lymphovascular invasion (P = .04) and higher nodal stage (P = .04) were more common with diffuse GBC. Median overall survival was significantly improved in those with focal cancer (5.1 vs 1.2years, P = .02). Although not statistically significant, this difference in overall survival persisted in patients who underwent definitive surgery (4.3 vs 2.4years, P = .70). Patients with diffuse involvement of the gallbladder mucosa likely represent a subset with aggressive biology and worse overall survival compared to focal disease. These findings may aid surgeons in subsequent surgical and medical decision-making for patients with GBC.

Impact of tumor size on the outcomes of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study

BackgroundTo evaluate the impact of tumor size on the perioperative and long-term outcomes of liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).MethodsWe reviewed the patients’ data who underwent liver resection for HCC between November 2009 and 2019. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the tumor size. Group I: HCC < 5 cm, Group II: HCC between 5 to 10 cm, and Group III: HCC ≥ 10 cm in size.ResultsThree hundred fifteen patients were included in the current study. Lower platelets count was noted Groups I and II. Higher serum alpha-feto protein was noted in Group III. Higher incidence of multiple tumors, macroscopic portal vein invasion, nearby organ invasion and presence of porta-hepatis lymph nodes were found in Group III. More major liver resections were performed in Group III. Longer operation time, more blood loss and more transfusion requirements were found in Group III. Longer hospital stay and more postoperative morbidities were noted in Group III, especially posthepatectomy liver failure, and respiratory complications.The median follow-up duration was 17 months (7–110 months). Mortality occurred in 100 patients (31.7%) and recurrence occurred in 147 patients (46.7%). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding recurrence free survival (Log Rank, p = 0.089) but not for overall survival (Log Rank, p = 0.001).ConclusionHCC size is not a contraindication for liver resection. With proper selection, safe techniques and standardized care, adequate outcomes could be achieved.

Vascular reconstruction and transplantation technologies in liver surgery (part II)

To systematize tactical and technical aspects of liver resections with reconstruction of afferent and efferent blood supply and/or inferior vena cava; to study postoperative outcomes in patients with focal liver lesions using transplantation technologies. We enrolled 413 patients with parasitic lesions, primary and secondary liver tumors involving great vessels (portal vein, hepatic artery, hepatic veins, inferior vena cava, right atrium). All ones underwent liver resections with vascular resection and reconstruction, as well as liver autotransplantation in vivo, ante situ (ex situ in vivo), extracorporeal liver resections with autotransplantation (ex vivo). We obtained satisfactory immediate results after liver resections using transplantation technologies. Transplantation technologies in liver surgery can significantly increase resectability of tumors and survival of patients. Transplantation technologies are an important new surgical strategy and necessary option in modern hepatic surgery.

Liver Surgery Outcomes: Early Experience of a Highly Trained Group in a Low-Income Country

Background: The aim of this study is to analyze the morbidity and mortaslity rates among patients undergoing hepatic resections at a tertiary healthcare center in the city of Cuenca, Ecuador. A surgical team with formal training in hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery performs these surgeries. Study Design: A retrospective descriptive cross-sectional study was performed over time between 2017 and 2022 at the Hospital Jose Carrasco Arteaga, in which all patients who underwent liver resection during a 5-year period were included. The variables used were: I. Demographic data variables (age, sex, BMI, cirrhotic, ASA), II. pre-surgical diagnosis variables, III. Intraoperative and postoperative outcome variables (complications, blood loss, time in the operating room, etc.). Outcomes: A total of 38 liver resections were identified, of which 26.3% were male and 73.7% were female. Mean age: 60.5 years. Of the patients, 31.6% were reoperated, 23.7% were readmitted to the hospital, and 18.4% required a trans-operative blood transfusion. The surgical time averaged 290 minutes. The most common reason for surgery was hepatocarcinoma (23.68%), followed by intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) (13.15%). Morbidity was 23,68%, corresponding to Clavien Dindo 3B or higher. The 90-day mortality rate was 5.25%. Conclusions: According to the results obtained during the period from 2017 to 2022 at Hospital Jose Carrasco Arteaga, the implementation of hepatic resections has been demonstrated to be a safe and effective procedure, characterized by low rates of mortality and morbidity

Utility of Machine Learning in the Prediction of Post-Hepatectomy Liver Failure in Liver Cancer.

Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is a serious complication associated with high mortality rates. Machine learning (ML) has rapidly developed and may outperform traditional models in predicting PHLF in patients who have undergone hepatectomy. This study aimed to predict PHLF using ML and compare its performance with that of traditional scoring systems. The clinicopathological data of 334 patients who underwent liver resection were retrospectively collected. The Pycaret library, a simple, open-source machine learning library, was used to compare multiple classification models for PHLF prediction. The predictive performance of 15 ML algorithms was compared using the mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and accuracy, and the best-fit model was selected among 15 ML algorithms. Next, the predictive performance of the selected ML-PHLF model was compared with that of routine scoring systems, the albumin-bilirubin score (ALBI) and the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, using AUROC. The best model was extreme gradient boosting (accuracy:93.1%; AUROC:0.863) among the 15 ML algorithms. As compared with ALBI and FIB-4, the ML PHLF model had higher AUROC for predicting PHLF. The novel ML model for predicting PHLF outperformed routine scoring systems.

Role of temporary portosystemic surgical shunt during liver resection to prevent a post-resection small for size-like syndrome

Liver resection stands as the gold-standard therapeutic approach for selected cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The extent of resectable parenchyma hinges upon the underlying liver function and its regenerative potential. Consequently, cirrhosis may impede access to potentially curative interventions for HCC arising within this context. Cirrhotic patients undergoing liver resection face heightened susceptibility to post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). The clinical profile of PHLF bears a resemblance to a well-documented syndrome within the liver transplant (LT) domain: Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS), a form of graft failure observed in the postoperative phase following LT with undersized or partial organs. Management of SFSS targets mitigating the overflow syndrome, achievable through diverse portal diversion techniques. Portal vein flow diversion encompasses procedures redirecting a variable proportion of portal vein flow towards systemic circulation. Consequently, derivative procedures aim to directly alleviate portal hypertension. Side-to-side portocaval shunts emerge as the most straightforward and efficacious means of decompressing the portal system. Furthermore, they afford flow calibration to diminish the incidence and severity of steal syndrome and hepatic encephalopathy, without compromising efficacy or hepatic function. Translating insights gleaned from LT complexities involving SFSS to liver resection, strategies involving portal flow diversion warrant consideration in efforts to forestall PHLF. This approach aims to extend the frontiers of liver surgery, broadening access to hepatectomy with curative intent, either as a standalone intervention or as part of a comprehensive treatment regimen where LT serves as a secondary option.

Impact of neoadjuvant FOLFOXIRI on postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing liver resection for colorectal liver metastases

Impact of neoadjuvant FOLFOXIRI on postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing liver resection for colorectal liver metastases

Pre-operative evaluation of spontaneous portosystemic shunts as a predictor of post-hepatectomy liver failure in patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

Pre-operative evaluation of spontaneous portosystemic shunts as a predictor of post-hepatectomy liver failure in patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the impact of tenofovir and entecavir on the prognosis of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing liver resection.

Tenofovir (TDF) and entecavir (ETV) are highly effective and well-tolerated nucleos(t)ide analogs commonly prescribed for hepatitis B virus (HBV) treatment. Yet, it is unclear whether survival outcomes differ for HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with ETV and TDF. Thus, this meta-analysis aimed to compare the prognostic effectiveness of ETV and TDF in HBV-related HCC patients. We comprehensively searched four databases, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, to identify pertinent studies utilizing keywords "entecavir," "tenofovir," "hepatocellular carcinoma," and "liver resection." Our primary outcomes of interest encompassed overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), early recurrence, and late recurrence. The statistical effect size for these measures was expressed in terms of hazard ratios (HRs). Our search yielded 10 studies encompassing 11 datasets involving 7,400 patients. Our meta-analysis revealed that patients treated with TDF achieved better OS (HR = 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.40-0.70, p < 0.0001), RFS (HR = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.57-0.80; p < 0.0001), early recurrence (HR = 0.80; 95% CI = 0.67-0.94; p < 0.0077), and late recurrence (HR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.43-0.97; p = 0.0368). We detected publication bias potentially affecting OS but not RFS. Our findings demonstrated that TDF outperformed ETV regarding RFS for HBV-related HCC patients. However, to bolster the evidence and establish more conclusive conclusions, further validation via extensive and high-quality randomized controlled trials is essential. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, identifier CRD 42024542579.

Patients undergoing liver resection who have had previous bile duct or ampullary surgery demonstrate an increased risk of infective postoperative complications

Patients undergoing liver resection who have had previous bile duct or ampullary surgery demonstrate an increased risk of infective postoperative complications

A Grading System of Microvascular Invasion for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Liver Resection with Curative Intent: A Multicenter Study.

Microvascular invasion (MVI) is closely correlated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A grading system of MVI is needed to assist in the management of HCC patient. Multicenter data of HCC patients who underwent liver resection with curative intent was analyzed. This grading system was established by detected number and distance from tumor boundary of MVI. Survival outcomes were compared among patients in each group. This system was verified by time-receiver operating characteristic curve, time-area under the curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analyses. Cox regression analysis was performed to study the associated factors of prognosis. Logistic analysis was used to study the predictive factors of MVI. All patients were classified into 4 groups: M0: no MVI; M1: 1~5 proximal MVIs (≤1 cm from tumor boundary); M2a: >5 proximal MVIs (≤1 cm from tumor boundary); M2b: ≥1 distal MVIs (>1 cm from tumor boundary). The recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and early RFS rates among all the individual groups were significantly different. Based on the number of proximal MVI (0~5 vs >5), patients in the M2b group were further divided into two subgroups which also showed different prognosis. Multiple methods showed this grading system to be significantly better than the MVI two-tiered system in prognostic evaluation. Four multivariate models for RFS, OS, early RFS, late RFS, and a predictive model of MVI were then established and were shown to satisfactorily evaluate prognosis and have a great discriminatory power, respectively. This MVI grading system could precisely evaluate prognosis of HCC patients after liver resection with curative intent and it could be employed in routine pathological reports. The severity of MVI from both adjacent and distant from tumor boundary should be stated. A hypothesis about two occurrence modes of distal MVI was proposed.

Oncological outcomes of patients undergoing liver resection for macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC): a propensity score matching analysis

Oncological outcomes of patients undergoing liver resection for macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC): a propensity score matching analysis