Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy Research Articles

Relationship between the Depth of Acetabuloplasty and Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy in Patients with Global Pincer Femoroacetabular Impingement: Study with a Minimum Follow‐Up Period of 2 Years

There has been no definite consensus on the ideal depth of acetabuloplasty, especially in cases of global pincer femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). This study aims to determine whether the depth of acetabuloplasty influences postoperative outcomes in cases of global pincer FAI. Data were retrospectively collected from patients with global pincer FAI who underwent hip arthroscopy with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years from May 2014 to December 2018. Patients with global pincer FAI were subdivided into low or high resection depth groups based on whether the intraoperative acetabular rim was resected by more than 3 mm. Radiographic measurements; arthroscopic procedures; preoperative and postoperative PROs were recorded. Achievement of MCID and PASS was compared for the VAS, mHHS, HOS-ADL, and iHOT-12. A paired Student t-test was used to evaluate the significance of preoperative and postoperative PROs and two-tailed unpaired Student t-test was used to compare demographic data and PROs between different groups. MCID and PASS were evaluated using the chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test. A total of 41 hips with global pincer FAI (15 and 26 patients in low or high resection depth groups, respectively) were included in this study. Both groups showed significant postoperative improvements in the scores of all PROs (p < 0.001). Compared to the low resection depth group, the high resection depth group had a lower degree of improvement through hip arthroscopy, which manifested as lower postoperative mHHS scores (94.29 vs. 85.08, p = 0.006), higher VAS scores (0.93 vs. 2.54, p = 0.002), and lower improvements in VAS (-5.00 vs. -3.35, p = 0.028), HOS-ADL (34.99 vs. 23.90, p = 0.017) and iHOT-12 (39.89 vs. 29.27, p = 0.036). Patients in high resection depth group were less likely to achieve the MCID for the VAS score compared to low resection depth group in significant (73.3 vs. 26.9%, p = 0.004). For patients with global pincer, the outcomes in high resection depth group were slightly worse than the the low resection depth group. It is indicated that excessive resection of the acetabular rim during the procedure should be avoided.

Increased 90-Day Readmissions and Complications Following Hip Arthroscopy in Centers With Low Surgical Volume in New York State

The aims of the study were to (1) classify surgical centers in New York State by volume of hip arthroscopies performed, (2) calculate rates of readmissions and complications by center volume, and (3) identify socioeconomic predictive factors for readmissions and complications following hip arthroscopy. Patients who underwent hip arthroscopy at New York State health care facilities from 2010 to 2020 were retrospectively identified using the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database. Hip arthroscopic procedures were identified using the following Current Procedural Terminology codes. Surgical center volumes were classified into 3 categories: low (<85th percentile), medium (85th-95th percentile), and high (>95th percentile). Incidence of readmissions and complications within 90 days was abstracted from SPARCS. Neighborhood socioeconomic status was quantified using the U.S. Area Deprivation Index. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine whether center volume and other socioeconomic variables were independent predictors of outcomes. In total, 50,252 patients who underwent hip arthroscopy were identified in SPARCS from 2010 to 2020. Of these patients, 13,861 (27.6%) underwent surgery at low-volume centers, 11,757 (23.4%) at medium-volume centers, and 24,634 (49.0%) at high-volume centers. Minorities, publicly insured patients, and patients from lower socioeconomic status neighborhoods made up a larger proportion of cases seen by low-volume centers versus high-volume centers (P < .001). Patients in the low-volume group experienced significantly greater 90-day rates of readmissions (P < .001) and all-cause complications (P < .001) than the other groups. Furthermore, high-volume centers were independently associated with lower odds of readmission (odds ratio 0.57, P < .001) and all-cause complications (odds ratio 0.73, P < .001) versus low-volume centers. Low-volume surgical centers are associated with increased readmission and complication rates following hip arthroscopy, independent of other socioeconomic factors such as age, sex, race, insurance status, and neighborhood socioeconomic status. III, retrospective comparative prognostic trial.

Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block Does Not Provide Significant Benefit for Primary Hip Arthroscopy with Pericapsular Infiltration: A Randomized Control Trial

To prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of the transmuscular quadratus lumborum block (TQLB) with pericapsular injection (PCI) versus PCI alone in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) in terms of perioperative pain control, as well as postoperative function in the postoperative anesthesia unit (PACU) setting. Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAI were prospectively randomized to receive 30 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine in a TQLB (n= 52) with PCI versus PCI alone (n= 51). The PCI included 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine given by the surgeon. All analyzed patients received general anesthesia. The primary outcome was postoperative pain scores assessed via the numerical rating scale (NRS) at 30 minutes postoperatively and immediately prior to discharge. Secondary outcomes were opioid utilization, expressed as morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), PACU recovery time, quadriceps strength (assessed after completion of PACU phase 1 criteria), and adverse events (nausea/vomiting). Average age, body mass index, and preoperative pain assessment were not significantly different between groups. There were no differences in NRS pain scores preoperatively, 30 minutes postoperatively, or immediately prior to discharge between groups (P > .05). Intraoperative opioid consumption was significantly lower in the TQLB group (MME: 16.8 ± 7.9) compared to controls (MME 20.6 ± 8.0; P= .009). However, there was no difference in the total opioid consumption (P > .05). There was no significant difference in total PACU length of stay (minutes) between the treatment (133.0 ± 48) and control groups (123.5 ± 47; P > .05). Quadriceps weakness was not significantly different between groups (P= .2). There was no difference in the number of patients that experienced nausea or vomiting between the TQLB group and control group (13% vs 16%; P= .99). Neither group had any reported serious adverse events. TQLB and PCI do not improve postoperative pain scores or total opioid consumption compared to PCI alone. TQLB may decrease the amount of intraoperative opiate usage. Level I, randomized controlled trial.

Timing From Symptom Onset to Hip Arthroscopy Does Not Affect Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement in Adolescent Patients

To evaluate symptom duration and its relationship to patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and survivorship after hip arthroscopy in adolescents. Patients ≤18 at time of primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) between January 2011 and September 2018 were included. Exclusion criteria consisted of history of previous ipsilateral hip surgery, presence of osteoarthritis or dysplasia on preoperative radiographs, previous hip fracture, or history of slipped capital femoral epiphysis or Legg-Calve-Perthes disease. Minimum 2-year PROs (modified Harris Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score [HOS]-Activities of Daily Living, HOS-Sport Scale, Short Forms 12 [SF-12]), minimum clinically significant difference (MCID) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) rates, and revision surgery rates were compared based on symptom duration. Two-year minimal follow-up was obtained for 111 patients (134 hips) (80%), including 74 females and 37 males with a mean age of 16.4 ± 1.1 (range 13.0-18.0). The mean symptom duration was 17.2 ± 15.2 months (range 43 days to 6.0 years). Ten patients (11 hips), 6 females (7 hips) and 4 males, required revision surgery at an average of 2.3 ± 1.0 years (range 0.9-4.3 years). At a mean follow-up of 4.8 ± 2.2 years (range 2-10 years), there were statistically significant improvements in all PROs (P < .05 for all). Symptom duration showed no significant correlation to post-operative scores (correlation coefficient range-0.162 to-0.078, P > .05 for all). Symptom duration ≤12 months versus >12 months or as a continuous variable was not a predictor for requiring revision surgery or achieving MCID/PASS (95% confidence interval crosses 1 for all). In an adolescent cohort of symptomatic FAI patients who underwent hip arthroscopy, there is no difference in PRO measures when analyzing symptom duration by arbitrary time intervals or as a continuous variable. Level IV, case series.

Workers’ Compensation Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Experience Worse Mid-Term Outcomes but Similar Return-to-Work: A Propensity-Matched Analysis at 5-Year Follow-Up

To investigate mid-term patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and return-to-work for workers' compensation (WC) patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy (HA) for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) versus propensity-matched, non-WC controls and to determine whether achievement rates of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) differ between these populations. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on WC patients who underwent primary HA for FAIS from 2012 to 2017. WC and non-WC patients were propensity matched on a 1:4 basis by sex, age, and body mass index (BMI). PROs were compared preoperatively and at 5 years postoperatively, employing the Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL) and Sports-Specific (HOS-SS) subscales, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), 12-item international Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), and visual analog scales (VAS) for pain and satisfaction. MCID and PASS were calculated using published thresholds for these measures. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs and the presence and timing of return to unrestricted work were evaluated. Forty-three WC patients were successfully matched to 172 non-WC controls and followed for 64.2 ± 7.7 months. WC patients demonstrated lower preoperative scores for all measures (P≤.031) and worse HOS-ADL, HOS-SS, and VAS pain scores at 5-year follow-up (P ≤ .021). There were no differences in MCID achievement rates or magnitude of change between preoperative and 5-year postoperative PROs (P ≥ .093); however, WC patients achieved PASS at lower rates for HOS-ADL and HOS-SS (P ≤ .009). 76.7% of WC and 84.3% of non-WC patients returned to work without restrictions (P= .302) at 7.4 ± 4.4 versus 5.0 ± 3.8 months, respectively (P<.001). WC patients undergoing HA for FAIS report worse preoperative pain and function than non-WC patients and experience worse pain, function, and PASS achievement at 5-year follow-up. However, they demonstrate similar MCID achievement and magnitude improvement between preoperative and 5-year postoperative PROs, and return to work without restrictions at a similar rate to non-WC patients, although they may take longer to do so. Level III, retrospective cohort study.

A Novel Approach to Improving Post-Operative Pain and Minimizing Opioid Consumption After a Hip Arthroscopy.

There have been many different approaches to controlling pain in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. These include medications, nerve blocks, and intra-articular injections among many others. We introduced a combination of a pre-operative pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, and intra-operative pericapsular injection of BKK (bupivacaine, ketamine, and ketorolac). Patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy were identified. There were three patient cohorts based on type of anesthesia: general anesthesia only (GA), general anesthesia and a pericapsular Marcaine injection (GA/Marcaine), or GA with pre-operative PENG block and an intraoperative BKK pericapsular injection (GA+PENG/BKK). Data collected included post-operative pain scores in the PACU (Post-Anesthesia Care Unit), time spent in the PACU, inpatient opioid consumption (both PACU and inpatient), and outpatient opioid prescriptions filled. 20 patients received GA, 11 patients received GA/Marcaine, and 20 patients received GA+PENG/BKK. The GA+PENG/BKK group had average PACU pain score of 3.9 out of 10 compared to 7.7 in the GA group (p<.001) and 6.6 in the GA/Marcaine injection group (p=.048). The GA+PENG/BKK group had shorter mean PACU times than either other group (p<.001). The GA+PENG/BKK also consumed less opioids than the GA or GA/Marcaine groups in the PACU (p<.001), and in the total inpatient stay (p=.002, p=.003), as well as outpatient (p=.019, p=.040). In patients undergoing a hip arthroscopy, performing a pre-operative PENG block and intra-operative BKK pericapsular injection will result in decreased postoperative pain, PACU time, and inpatient and outpatient opioids compared to general anesthesia only and general anesthesia with intracapsular Marcaine.

The effectiveness of hydrotherapy on return to play in sports following hip arthroscopic surgery: a comparative study.

The postoperative management of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is variable with favourable surgical outcomes. Yet there is no evidence on the efficacy of hydrotherapy in athletes undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAI. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role and the impact of hydrotherapy on return to sports following hip arthroscopy for symptomatic FAI. 2 cohorts of mixed level of athletes from various sports: a hydrotherapy group that followed land-based exercises in combination with hydrotherapy exercises and a control group that followed solely the same land-based exercises. Pre- and postoperative pain and hip-specific outcome scores were completed, and patient satisfaction was rated. A total of 88 hip arthroscopies were included with a minimum of 2 years follow-up; the hydrotherapy group comprised of 36 hips and the control group, 52 hips. There was a significant improvement in time to return to previous performance (HR 1.91, 95% CI, 1.21-3.01; p = 0.005) in the hydrotherapy group compared with the control. The hip-specific scores and patient satisfaction were considerably improved in the hydrotherapy group. The analysis of our data indicates that the incorporation of hydrotherapy into postoperative rehabilitation for hip arthroscopy for FAI accelerates the return of athletes to their pre-injury performance, since recovery time decreased significantly.

Hip Joint Venting Decreases the Traction Force Required to Access the Central Compartment During Hip Arthroscopy

To investigate the effect of hip joint venting on the magnitude of traction force required to arthroscopically access the central compartment of the hip. Patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome prospectively underwent an intraoperative traction protocol. Joint space was measured on fluoroscopic images obtained at 50 and 100 lbs of axial traction in the prevented and vented state, and joint space values were normalized to millimetric values using preoperative anteroposterior pelvis radiographs. Venting was performed by inserting a large gauge spinal needle into the hip joint through the hip capsule and removing the stylet. Joint space differences were compared with paired t-tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and McNemar tests. Fifty hips in 46 patients were included. Mean joint space before venting was 7.4 ± 2.6 mm and 13.3 ± 2.8 mm at 50 and 100 lbs of traction, respectively. Mean joint space after venting was 13.9 ± 2.3 mm and 15.5 ± 2.4 mm at 50 and 100 lbs of traction, respectively. Mean differences in joint space at 50 and 100 lbs were 6.5 mm (P < .001) and 2.2 mm (P < .001), respectively. Mean joint space at 50 lbs in the vented state was significantly greater than in the pre-vented state at 100 lbs (13.9 mm vs. 13.3 mm; P= .002). The increase in joint space between 50 and 100 lbs of traction was significantly greater in the prevented state than in the vented state (5.9 mm vs 1.6 mm; P= .021). Venting the hip reduces the traction force necessary to arthroscopically visualize and instrument the central compartment of the hip by at least 50%. Further, residual negative pressurization of the hip joint remains after breaking the labral suction seal and venting effectively eliminates this phenomenon to aid in hip joint distraction at lower traction force. Level IV, case series.

Validation of the Brazilian version of the Hip Sports Activity Scale (HSAS) for patients with femoroacetabular impingement: a cross-sectional study.

The Hip Sports Activity Scale (HSAS) is a hip-specific instrument for assessing the present levels of physical activity among patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome. When evaluating treatment outcomes in patients with FAI syndrome, it is necessary to use joint-specific instruments and ones that can evaluate the levels of physical activity in these patients, such as the HSAS-Brazil. To validate the HSAS-Brazil among a group of physically active patients after arthroscopic treatment of FAI syndrome. Cross-sectional research of quantitative and qualitative types using data obtained from July 2018 to October 2019. A total of 58 patients of both genders diagnosed with FAI syndrome and who had undergone hip arthroscopy participated in this research. To establish reliability and validity, patients first answered the Brazilian versions of the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS), and HSAS; after a 48-hour interval, they answered the HSAS-Brazil again. For test-retest reliability, the interclass correlation was 0.908 (P < 0.001). The HSAS-Brazil correlated to the NAHS-Brazil (r = 0.63, P < 0.001), as well as the SF-12 (Physical Health) (r = 0.42, P = 0.001). The HSAS-Brazil was validated and proved to be a reliable and valid scale to assess sports activity levels in physically active patients with FAI syndrome after arthroscopic treatment.

Effects of Preexisting Anxiety and Depression on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Aged 30 Years and Younger Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

Background: Mental health influences postoperative outcomes in orthopedic procedures. Increasing attention is being paid to this effect. Purpose: We sought to evaluate the effect of diagnosed depression, anxiety, or both on postoperative outcomes in patients who have undergone hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 289 patients aged 30 years or younger who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAIS at a single institution from January 2014 to June 2021. Univariate statistics were used to assess differences between patients diagnosed with depression, anxiety, or both, and those without these diagnoses. Differences included demographics, operative characteristics, and postoperative outcomes: duration of postanesthesia care unit (PACU) stay, PACU pain scores, complications, reoperations, postoperative injections, 90-day emergency department (ED) visits, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Multivariate analysis was used to evaluate risk factors for postoperative complications, including wound infection, documented reinjury, postoperative intra-articular hip injection, and any reoperation. Results: Patients diagnosed with depression, anxiety, or both were more likely to be older, female, and have a higher comorbidity burden. At the time of surgery, they were more likely to undergo concomitant procedures, including bursectomy and iliotibial band release. Postoperatively, they had longer PACU stays (90.5 vs 75.1 minutes) and higher first PACU pain scores (5.9 vs 4.6), as well as higher rates of postoperative injection (18.1 vs 9.2%), any reoperation (13.9% vs 4.6%), and revision hip arthroscopy (11.1% vs. 3.7%). Diagnoses of depression, anxiety, or both were independently predictive of any reoperation (odds ratio [OR] = 2.841) and revision hip arthroscopy (OR = 3.401). Conclusion: This retrospective cohort study found that, in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAIS, there was an association between a diagnosis of depression, anxiety, or both, and increased comorbidities, higher first PACU pain scores, longer PACU stays, and increased rates of postoperative injection, any reoperation, or revision hip arthroscopy. Targeted interventions may improve outcomes, but further study is warranted.

The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block for hip surgery. A narrative review

Introduction. Perioperative pain management associated with hip surgery is challenging. The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a new technique thought to provide better postoperative analgesia in addition to its motor-sparing effects. Aim. This review aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the PENG blockade in managing postoperative pain in patients undergoing hip surgery. Methods. The literature was reviewed through four electronic databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Embase. Results. The initial search yielded 416 articles. Twenty-seven relevant articles were selected based on relevance, recentness, search quality, and citations. Twelve of the studies were related to patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Twelve studies were related to patients undergoing total hip surgery due to hip fracture. Finally, three studies were related to patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. Conclusions. The PENG block provides superior analgesia and low opioid consumption in the first postoperative period. However, current evidence is insufficient, and there is a need for high-quality randomized, controlled trials with larger sample sizes.

Return to Ballet Progression for Dancers After Hip Arthroscopy for Instability or Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

Ballet dancers may be predisposed to hip injuries because of the unique demands placed on the hips during dance training and performance. Hip arthroscopy can be used to address several of these symptomatic disorders, including hip instability and femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). After hip arthroscopy, ballet dancers undergo a rehabilitation program to allow for healing, range of motion restoration, and progressive strengthening. Once patients complete the standard postoperative therapy program, a paucity of information is available to guide dancers back to the advanced hip movements involved in ballet. Therefore, the purpose of this clinical commentary is to present a stepwise rehabilitation protocol with return to ballet progression for dancers undergoing hip arthroscopy for instability or FAIS. Particular emphasis is placed on movement-specific exercises for ballet performers, and objective clinical metrics, to guide return to dance progression.

Hypermobile Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Can Be Effectively Treated Utilizing Hip Arthroscopy With Periportal Capsulotomy Closure: A Matched Cohort Analysis Compared to Patients Without Joint Hypermobility

To assess the 2-year outcomes of arthroscopic treatment with periportal capsulotomy closure for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) in patients with generalized ligamentous laxity (GLL). A retrospective analysis was performed from a prospectively collected database of FAIS patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. FAIS patients with GLL were identified as having Beighton score ≥4. FAIS patients with GLL were treated with arthroscopic labral repair, osteochondroplasty, via periportal capsulotomy with subsequent capsular closure. These patients were matched by age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) with a cohort of FAIS patients without GLL who underwent the same procedure via periportal capsulotomy without capsular closure. Preoperatively, and 2 years postoperatively, patients completed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) scores, including the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), 12-item Short-Form survey (SF-12) and the visual analog scale (VAS). Forty patients (5 male, 35 female) with FAIS and GLL were included (age: 29.7 ± 9.0; BMI: 23.3 ± 4.1). FAIS patients with GLL demonstrated similar significant PRO score improvements compared to a matched cohort of FAIS patients without GLL at 2 years after surgery (VAS Pain: (-)2.5 ± 3.0, (-)2.7 ± 2.7; SF-12 PCS: 17.7 ± 14.2, 16.7 ± 15.0; HOOS-Symptoms: 26.3 ± 24.0, 20.6 ± 18.1; HOOS-Pain: 29.8 ± 20.4, 24.4 ± 9.0; HOOS-ADL: 24.9 ± 18.4, 22.0 ± 19.9; HOOS-Sports: 43.6 ± 26.1, 33.1 ± 29.8; and HOOS-QOL: 44.2 ± 27.6, 41.7 ± 27.1, respectively). Both cohorts achieved minimal clinically important differences (MCID) for each HOOS subscore at equivalent high rates (70-88%). Patients with GLL in the setting of FAIS can be effectively treated with arthroscopy via periportal capsulotomy and capsular closure. These patients demonstrate significant improvements in PRO scores at 2 years, similar to normal laxity FAIS patients undergoing arthroscopic treatment via periportal capsulotomy without capsular closure. Level III, retrospective comparative therapeutic trial.

High-level soccer players have a low rate of return to performance after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome

PurposeFemoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is a known cause of impaired sports performance in athletes and the relationship between FAIS and soccer players has previously been described. Hip arthroscopy is a viable treatment option that can facilitate athletes’ return to sport (RTS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the RTS and return to performance (RTP) with objective measurements in high-level soccer players after hip arthroscopy for FAIS.MethodSoccer players, with a hip sports activity scale (HSAS) level of 7 or 8 before symptom onset and undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAIS between 2011 and 2019 were identified in the Gothenburg hip arthroscopic registry. A total of 83 high-level soccer players, with a mean age of 23.9 (SD 4.4) years at surgery, were included. To verify the activity level and further stratify players as elite or sub-elite, player statistics were collected from soccer-specific scout webpages and the Swedish national soccer association. The return to sport was defined as return to one game of soccer. Return to performance was defined as playing at the same level, or higher, and participating in at least 80% of the number of games played the season before symptom onset or the season before surgery either the first or second season after hip arthroscopy.ResultsIn total, 71 (85.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 76.1–92.3%) of the players returned to sport the first or second season after surgery. Compared to the season before symptom onset, 31 (37.3%, 95% CI 27.0–48.7%) players returned to performance the first or second season after surgery, and 32 (38.6%, 95% CI 28.1–49.9%) players returned to performance the first or second season after surgery compared to the season before surgery.ConclusionA high rate of elite and sub-elite soccer players return to soccer after hip arthroscopy for FAIS. However, less than half of the players RTP when evaluating performance through level of play and number of games played.Level of evidenceLevel IV.

Improved Mental Health Status and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement

Background: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is often a chronic problem, which can lead to a decrease in mental well-being. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to determine patient mental health improvement after hip arthroscopy and if this improvement correlated with improved outcomes. It was hypothesized that patients with low mental health (LMH) status would improve after hip arthroscopy for FAI and that their patient-reported outcomes (PROs) would significantly improve after surgery. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who underwent hip arthroscopy with labral repair between 2008 and 2015 were included. The minimum follow-up was 2 years. PROs included the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), HOS–Sports (HOS-Sports), and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). The minimal clinically important difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) were determined for HOS-ADL, HOS-Sports, and the mHHS based on previously published studies. Patients who scored <46.5 on the SF-12 Mental Component Summary (MCS) were in the LMH group, and those who scored ≥46.5 were in the high mental health (HMH) group. Results: In total, 120 (21%) of the 566 patients were in the LMH group and 446 (79%) patients were in the HMH group preoperatively. There was no difference in age or sex between groups. Patients in the LMH group had lower mHHS, HOS-ADL, and HOS-Sports at the mean 4-year follow-up and were less likely to reach PASS for the scores. Postoperatively, 84% (478/566) of the entire group was in the HMH group. A total of 88 (73%) of the LMH group improved to HMH. A multiple linear regression model for change in MCS identified independent predictors of changes in preoperative MCS to be LMH group preoperatively, change in HOS-Sports, and change in mHHS (r2 = 0.4; P < .001). Conclusion: HMH was achieved in 84% of the patients after hip arthroscopy for FAI. Improvement in MCS was correlated with function and activity, as indicated by a significant correlation with HOS-ADL and HOS-Sports. A small percentage of patients did see a decline in their MCS score. This study showed that patients with LMH scores before hip arthroscopy for FAI can improve to normal/high mental health, and this correlated with higher PROs.

Distraction Gap Needed for Safe Central Compartment Access in Hip Arthroscopy

Background: Sufficient distraction of the hip is the key to a safe central compartment (CC) approach in hip arthroscopy. However, an adequate distraction gap has not been scientifically identified. Purpose: To determine the sufficient amount of distraction that could predict a successful CC access as well as to identify the risk factors for a failed or difficult CC access. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: All patients who underwent hip arthroscopy by a single surgeon between January 2018 and April 2019 were prospectively enrolled. We analyzed gaps of the hip on 4 C-arm fluoroscopic images: nondistraction, preoperative manual traction, preoperative maximal traction (without distension), and intraoperative maximal traction (at the end of CC procedures in a successful CC approach or after peripheral compartment procedures in a failed or difficult CC approach). A failed CC approach was defined as failure in introducing the anterolateral portal to the CC under arthroscopic control; a difficult CC approach was defined as the presence of an incomplete diagnostic round in the CC because of a small distraction. The amount of distraction was evaluated by the ratio of the distracted gap to the undistracted gap. Patients were classified into the successful CC access group (group 1) and the failed/difficult CC access group (group 2). The amount of distraction, demographic characteristics, and preoperative radiographic parameters were compared between the groups. Results: A total of 240 patients were included in this study. Group 1 consisted of 205 patients (113 males and 92 females; mean ± SD age, 34.5 ± 11.4 years), and group 2 consisted of 35 patients (27 males and 8 females; age, 32.5 ± 11.2 years). The preoperative joint space width was not significantly different between group 1 (mean ± SD, 3.89 ± 0.83 mm) and group 2 (3.68 ± 0.68 mm). The ratio of the amount of distraction at lateral gaps under all traction conditions was significantly greater in group 1 compared with group 2 (1.50 ± 0.54 vs 1.26 ± 0.35, respectively, under preoperative manual traction; 2.84 ± 0.76 vs 2.03 ± 0.63 under preoperative maximal traction; 3.36 ± 0.96 vs 2.50 ± 0.79 under intraoperative maximal traction). An increase of the lateral gap by >2.2 times (P < .001) under preoperative maximal traction and by >2.7 times (P < .001) under intraoperative maximal traction could predict successful CC access. Male sex (odds ratio [OR], 2.94; P = .017) and increased lateral center-edge angle (OR, 1.08 for every 1° increase; P = .004) were significant risk factors for failed/difficult CC access. Conclusion: An increase of the lateral gap by >2.2 times during an unsterile traction test without joint distension could predict successful CC access. Male sex and increased lateral center-edge angle were risk factors for a failed or difficult CC access.

Use of an Artificial Intelligence Conversational Agent (Chatbot) for Hip Arthroscopy Patients Following Surgery

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of an AI conversational agent during the postoperative recovery of patients undergoing elective hip arthroscopy. Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy were enrolled in a prospective cohort for their first 6 weeks following surgery. Patients used standard SMS text messaging to interact with an artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot ("Felix") used to initiate automated conversations regarding elements of postoperative recovery. Patient satisfaction was measured at 6 weeks after surgery using a Likert scale survey. Accuracy was determined by measuring the appropriateness of chatbot responses, topic recognition, and examples of confusion. Safety was measured by evaluating the chatbot's responses to any questions with potential medical urgency. Twenty-six patients were enrolled with a mean age of 36 years, and 58% (n= 15) were male. Overall, 80% of patients (n= 20) rated the helpfulness of Felix as good or excellent. In the postoperative period, 12/25 (48%) patients reported being worried about a complication but were reassured by Felix and, thus, did not seek medical attention. Of a total of 128 independent patient questions, Felix handled 101/128 questions appropriately (79%), either by addressing them independently, or facilitating contact with the care team. Felix was able to adequately answer the patient question independently 31% of the time (n= 40/128). Of 10 patient questions that were thought to potentially represent patient complications, in 3 cases Felix did not adequately address or recognize the health concern-none of these situations resulted in patient harm. The results of this study demonstrate that the use of a chatbot or conversational agent can enhance the postoperative experience for hip arthroscopy patients, as demonstrated by high levels of patient satisfaction. Level IV, therapeutic case series.

The HAR-index: a reliable method for evaluating the risk of total hip arthroplasty conversion after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement.

Hip arthroscopy is a growing technique in the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), but can sometimes lead to unsatisfactory results such as the early conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study is to describe a new tool for assessing the preoperative risk of THA conversion after hip arthroscopy in patients with FAI. This study is a retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort of 584 patients with FAI who underwent hip arthroscopy at a single centre with a minimum 2years follow-up. The preoperative variables of these patients were analysed to calculate the risk of each variable for THA. By selecting variables with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve greater than 0.7, a calculator was created to provide a risk index for each patient. Four variables (age, body mass index, Tönnis score and ALAD) were associated with an increased risk of THA conversion. The optimal cut-off points for each variable were determined, and a risk index was created. The Hip-Arthroplasty-Risk Index (HAR-Index) is a 0-4 points scale obtained from four binary scores of 0 or 1 depending on whether the cut-off point for each variable was reached or not. The increased risk of THA for each HAR-Index value was 1.1%, 6.2%, 17.9%, 55.1% and 79.3% respectively. The HAR-Index showed a very good predictive capacity with an area under the ROC curve of 0.89. The HAR-Index is a simple and practical tool for practitioners to make more informed decisions about performing hip arthroscopy in patients with FAI. With a very good predictive capacity, the HAR-Index can help to reduce the rate of conversion to THA. Level III.

Paper 12: Elite Female Athletes Demonstrate Comparable Improvement in Midterm Patient Reported Outcome Scores and Rate of Return to Sport Compared to Elite Male Athletes After Hip Arthroscopy: A Sex-Based Comparison in Professional and Collegiate Athletes

Objectives: (1) To report minimum 5-year patient reported outcome scores (PROs) and continuation of sport for elite female athletes undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and (2) to compare clinical results with a matched control group of elite male athletes. Methods: Data on all consecutive elite female athletes who underwent primary hip arthroscopy performed by the senior author (X.X.X.) between March 2009 and March 2016 were collected. Patients were eligible if underwent hip arthroscopy for labral tears or FAI and participated at a collegiate or professional level within 1 year of surgery. Minimum 5-year PROs were collected for the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score-Sport Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. The rates of patients achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) were also recorded. These athletes were propensity-matched to elite male athletes for comparison. Results: Sixty-five elite female athlete hips were included in the study. Elite female athletes had an average follow-up time of 67.6 ± 6.5 and age of 24.3 ± 6.8. When propensity-matched to a control group of elite male athletes, female athletes demonstrated lower preoperative PRO scores and comparable minimum 5-year post-op scores, improvement between preoperative and minimum 5-year scores, and continuation of sport rate. Conclusions: Elite female athletes undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for FAI demonstrated significant improvement in PROs and high rates of CTS which were similar to a propensity-matched group of elite male athletes. [Figure: see text][Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Paper 09: Revision rate following primary hip arthroscopy in patients given prophylactic oral losartan for the prevention of post-surgical fibrosis versus no losartan

Objectives: To evaluate whether postoperative treatment with Losartan decreased the revision rate in patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy. Methods: Patients underwent primary hip arthroscopy with labral repair and CAM osteoplasty and rim trimming between 2012 and 2017. Patients who underwent microfracture, labral debridement or reconstruction, core decompression, ligamentous teres repair or reconstruction, or capsular reconstruction were excluded. Losartan was added to all patients’ post-operative protocol in December 2015. Patients who underwent hip arthroscopy prior to November 2015 were included in the no-Losartan group (NOLOS) and patients who had arthroscopy between December 2015 and Dec 2017 were included in the losartan group (LOS). Results: Of the 964 cases, follow-up was obtained on 673 patients (70%). There were 405 patients in the NOLOS group and 268 in the LOS group. There was no difference in gender distribution (P=0.128) between groups. The LOS group was significantly older (36.6 ±13 years) compared to the NOLOS group (34.1±11)(p=0.012). Average follow-up in the NOLOS group was 5.8±2 years and was 4.1±1 years in the LOS group. Revision hip arthroscopy was required in 35 (8.6%) patients in the NOLOS group and 6 (2.2%) patients in the LOS group(p=0.001). There was no difference in age between those patients who required revision (32±11 years) and those who did not(35±12 years)(p=0.137). Conclusions: The prevalence of revision hip arthroscopy was significantly lower (2.2%) in patients who took Losartan as part of their post-operative protocol compared to those who did not (8.6%). Reduction in the need for revision hip arthroscopy can improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare dollars spent.