Underrepresented Minority Research Articles

Exome Sequencing Identifies Carriers of the Autosomal Dominant Cancer Predisposition Disorders Beyond Current Practice Guideline Recommendations.

The autosomal dominant cancer predisposition disorders hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) and Lynch syndrome (LS) are genetic conditions for which early identification and intervention have a positive effect on the individual and public health. The goals of this study were to determine whether germline genetic screening using exome sequencing could be used to efficiently identify carriers of HBOC and LS. Participants were recruited from three geographically and racially diverse sites in the United States (Rochester, MN; Phoenix, AZ; Jacksonville, FL). Participants underwent Exome+ sequencing (Helix Inc, San Mateo, CA) and return of results for specific genetic findings: HBOC (BRCA1 and BRCA1) and LS (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and EPCAM). Chart review was performed to collect demographics and personal and family cancer history. To date, 44,306 participants have enrolled in Tapestry. Annotation and interpretation of all variants in genes for HBOC and LS resulted in the identification of 550 carriers (prevalence, 1.24%), which included 387 with HBOC (27.2% BRCA1, 42.8% BRCA2) and 163 with LS (12.3% MSH6, 8.8% PMS2, 4.5% MLH1, 3.8% MSH2, and 0.2% EPCAM). More than half of these participants (52.1%) were newly diagnosed carriers with HBOC and LS. In all, 39.2% of HBOC/LS carriers did not satisfy National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria for genetic evaluation. NCCN criteria were less commonly met in underrepresented minority populations versus self-reported White race (51.5% v 37.5%, P = .028). Our results emphasize the need for wider utilization of germline genetic sequencing for enhanced screening and detection of individuals who have LS and HBOC cancer predisposition syndromes.

Investigating the existence of ethnic bias in professional services

The underrepresentation of ethnic minorities persists in professional service organizations because some are reluctant to hire minority employees owing to fear of negative customer evaluations. I apply expectancy violation theory to challenge the assumptions behind such hiring practice and predict that in unambiguous service encounters between majority customers and minority professional service providers (PSP) detrimental consequences are less salient. In four scenario-based studies in two contexts (lawyer, physician), I manipulate PSP ethnicity status and find that clients rate minority (vs. majority) PSPs more favorably in terms of competence, satisfaction, and rapport; rapport also mediates the relationship between PSP ethnicity status and clients’ compliance with their advice. This relationship is moderated by social dominance orientation too. A fifth study shows that the predicted relationships largely hold for positively and negatively valenced encounters. These results suggest an absence of bias effects in professional service settings and have implications for research and practice.

P044 Enabling skin research participation of under-represented ethnic minority populations: a codesigned inclusion toolkit

P044 Enabling skin research participation of under-represented ethnic minority populations: a codesigned inclusion toolkit

Study protocol for ADHERE (Applying Directly observed therapy to HydroxyurEa to Realize Effectiveness): Using small business partnerships to deliver a scalable and novel hydroxyurea adherence solution to youth with sickle cell disease.

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited blood disorder that affects approximately 100,000 Americans, primarily from underrepresented racial minority populations, and results in costly, multi-organ complications. Hydroxyurea, the primary disease-modifying therapy for SCD, is effective at reducing most complications; however, adherence to hydroxyurea remains suboptimal and is the primary barrier to clinical effectiveness. Video directly observed therapy (VDOT) has shown promise as an adherence-promoting intervention for hydroxyurea, yet previous VDOT trials were limited by high attrition from gaps in technology access, use of unvalidated adherence measures, and healthcare system limitations of delivering VDOT to patients. As such, we fostered a small business partnership to compare VDOT for hydroxyurea to attention control to address previous shortcomings, promote equitable trial participation, and maximize scalability. VDOT will be administered by Scene Health (formerly emocha Health) and adherence monitoring will be performed using a novel electronic adherence monitor developed to meet the unique needs of the target population. Adolescent and young adult patients as well as caregivers of younger patients (<11 years of age) will be recruited. In addition to visit incentives, all participants will be offered a smartphone with a data plan to ensure all participants have equal opportunity to complete study activities. The primary objectives of this pilot, multi-center, randomized controlled trial (RCT) are to assess retention and sustained engagement and to explore needs and preferences for longer-term adherence monitoring and interventions. This RCT is registered with the National Institutes of Health (NCT06264700). Findings will inform a future efficacy RCT applying VDOT to hydroxyurea to address adherence gaps and improve outcomes within this vulnerable population.

Improving the practical skills of STEM students at a historically black college and university (HBCU)

Improving the practical skills of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) students at a historically black college and university (HBCU) was done by implementing a transformative teaching model. The model was implemented on undergraduate students of different educational levels in the Electrical Engineering (EE) Department at HBCU. The model was also extended to carefully chosen high and middle schools. These middle and high school students serve as a pipeline to the university, with a particular emphasis on fostering growth within the EE Department. The model aligns well with the core mission of the EE Department, aiming to enhance the theoretical knowledge and practical skills of students, ensuring that they are qualified to work in industry or to pursue graduate studies. The implemented model prepares students for outstanding STEM careers. It also increases enrolment, student retention, and the number of underrepresented minority graduates in a technology-based workforce.

Diverse Mentoring Connections Across Institutional Boundaries in the Biomedical Sciences: Innovative Graph Database Analysis.

With an overarching goal of increasing diversity and inclusion in biomedical sciences, the National Research Mentoring Network (NRMN) developed a web-based national mentoring platform (MyNRMN) that seeks to connect mentors and mentees to support the persistence of underrepresented minorities in the biomedical sciences. As of May 15, 2024, the MyNRMN platform, which provides mentoring, networking, and professional development tools, has facilitated more than 12,100 unique mentoring connections between faculty, students, and researchers in the biomedical domain. This study aimed to examine the large-scale mentoring connections facilitated by our web-based platform between students (mentees) and faculty (mentors) across institutional and geographic boundaries. Using an innovative graph database, we analyzed diverse mentoring connections between mentors and mentees across demographic characteristics in the biomedical sciences. Through the MyNRMN platform, we observed profile data and analyzed mentoring connections made between students and faculty across institutional boundaries by race, ethnicity, gender, institution type, and educational attainment between July 1, 2016, and May 31, 2021. In total, there were 15,024 connections with 2222 mentees and 1652 mentors across 1625 institutions contributing data. Female mentees participated in the highest number of connections (3996/6108, 65%), whereas female mentors participated in 58% (5206/8916) of the connections. Black mentees made up 38% (2297/6108) of the connections, whereas White mentors participated in 56% (5036/8916) of the connections. Mentees were predominately from institutions classified as Research 1 (R1; doctoral universities-very high research activity) and historically Black colleges and universities (556/2222, 25% and 307/2222, 14%, respectively), whereas 31% (504/1652) of mentors were from R1 institutions. To date, the utility of mentoring connections across institutions throughout the United States and how mentors and mentees are connected is unknown. This study examined these connections and the diversity of these connections using an extensive web-based mentoring network.

Disparities Associated with Decision to Undergo Oncologic Surgery: A Prospective Mixed-Methods Analysis

BackgroundUnderrepresented minority patients with surgical malignancies experience disparities in outcomes. The impact of provider-based factors, including communication, trust, and cultural competency, on outcomes is not well understood. This study examines modifiable provider-based barriers to care experienced by patients with surgical malignancies.MethodsA parallel, prospective, mixed-methods study enrolled patients with lung or gastrointestinal malignancies undergoing surgical consultation. Surveys assessed patients’ social needs and patient-physician relationship. Semi-structured interviews ascertained patient experiences and were iteratively analyzed, identifying key themes.ResultsThe cohort included 24 patients (age 62 years; 63% White and 38% Black/African American). The most common cancers were lung (n = 18, 75%) and gastroesophageal (n = 3, 13%). Survey results indicated that food insecurity (n = 5, 21%), lack of reliable transportation (n = 4, 17%), and housing instability (n = 2, 8%) were common. Lack of trust in their physician (n = 3, 13%) and their physician’s treatment recommendation (n = 3, 13%) were identified. Patients reported a lack of empathy (n = 3, 13%), lack of cultural competence (n = 3, 13%), and inadequate communication (n = 2, 8%) from physicians. Qualitative analysis identified five major themes regarding the decision to undergo surgery: communication, trust, health literacy, patient fears, and decision-making strategies. Five patients (21%) declined the recommended surgery and were more likely Black (100% vs. 21%), lower income (100% vs. 16%), and reported poor patient-physician relationship (40% vs. 5%; all p < 0.05).ConclusionsFactors associated with declining recommended cancer surgery were underrepresented minority race and poor patient-physician relationships. Interventions are needed to improve these barriers to care and racial disparities.

Undergraduate Economics Program Enhancements to Increase Doctoral Program Participation by Under-Represented Students

The economics profession as with STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) disciplines has recognized that it faces a “pipeline” problem of low numbers of under-represented minorities (URM) completing PhDs. The ancillary described in this article addresses the economics pipeline problem by using strategies modeled after University of Maryland Baltimore County’s (UMBC’s) STEM focused Meyerhoff Scholars program. These strategies include identifying URM students in early stages of their undergraduate careers with the ability and motivation to pursue graduate work, providing information about career opportunities for those completing PhDs, guidance on course selection and on undergraduate research opportunities. UMBC’s Predoctoral Fellows in Economics Program prepares students for successful admission into well-regarded PhD programs by enhancing their likelihood of successful applications to predoctoral programs in economics. URM undergraduates who maintain strong grades in mathematics, statistics, and economics and who engage in productive undergraduate research experiences and produce high-quality research output should find exciting predoctoral, doctoral and career opportunities.

Solidifying the minority high school student pathway: evidence from the health professions recruitment and exposure program.

The objective of this report is to provide longitudinal insights on the impact of a health professions exposure program for high school students of underrepresented backgrounds in medicine. Medical students at the University of Chicago reviewed data from their chapter of the Health Profession Recruitment and Exposure Program (HPREP) from 2016-2021 to discover trends in enrollment. This data is documented in the context of the program's mission to increase awareness of health disparities, the success of prominent alumni, and recent community efforts post-COVID-19 pandemic. Two hundred and ninety-nine high school students participated in the University of Chicago HPREP program between 2016 and 2021. Participants ranged in age from 12 to 18 years (mean = 16, SD = 1) and 74% (n = 222) were female students. Of 252 respondents, 58% (n = 147) identified as Black or African American, 31% (n = 77) identified as Latinx or of Hispanic origin, and 10% (n = 24) identified as another race or as bi-racial. Ten or fewer black male students participated in the program every year, including the 2020-2021 year in which 61 students participated. HPREP has played an important role in shaping the face of health care, especially in Chicago. The data suggests significant increases in the number of underrepresented minority women becoming physicians and serving Chicago communities in the next decade. Pathway programs for underrepresented students in medicine should be strategic in recruiting and educating future health professionals based on future workforce needs.

A multi-tiered mentoring community approach to research experiences for local students from disadvantaged and underrepresented minority backgrounds

IntroductionA research and mentoring program was developed to provide local first-generation students, students returning to school after a professional experience, and underrepresented minority students resources and relationships to guide them toward a STEM degree from a four-year university.MethodsA multi-tiered mentoring community was formed including direct mentoring from graduate students and faculty advisors, peer mentoring among undergraduate students from different colleges and universities, and high school students to increase the accessibility of research opportunities for this demographic. Local students were recruited from Northwest Arkansas Community College and Upward Bound to combine community college and high school students in a novel manner. The programs were integrated whenever possible to emphasize peer mentoring, including mentoring lunches, research meetings, presentation sessions, conference presentations, and professional development mentoring sessions.ResultsOn the post-program survey, students indicated the community formed in the program supported their STEM identity development, provided them with quality relationships, and developed skills valuable to completion of a STEM degree. This identity development was further evidenced by the students presenting their work at a conference and obtaining additional research positions after the summer program ended.ConclusionThe post-program scores and continued efforts of different demographics of students to pursue STEM highlight the versatility of the multi-tiered mentoring community model to serve students from different ages, backgrounds, and demographics.

The impact of mentoring in higher education on student career development: a systematic review and research agenda

ABSTRACT Studies published over the last four decades provide the basis for a systematic review of the impact of mentoring in higher education (HE) on student career development. We review 73 papers published between 1986 and 2023 and develop a framework to examine the relationships between mentoring approaches and career development outcomes. Here, we distinguish between different student populations (female students, under-represented groups). Notwithstanding an overall positive verdict on mentoring's career development potential, with particular emphasis on career choice and transitioning behaviour, the results are not always positive, and many nuances in the data are evident. At a time of increased concern about student transitions into the labour market, practical implications can be derived which may strengthen mentoring's benefits, e.g. the value of peer mentoring for female students, and cultural proximity of mentors for under-represented minority students pursuing Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) careers. Key research recommendations include:(1) developing novel impact indicators related to emotion such as career inspiration and passion; (2) examining under-researched impact indicators related to non-traditional student careers (e.g. entrepreneurial intentions), and employment and socioeconomic impact indicators; and (3) investigating the role of context and mentoring content and delivery modalities, in helping to explain inconsistent findings across the reviewed papers.

Using an AI trial screening tool to assess language as a barrier for enrollment of underrepresented minorities in cancer clinical trials.

e13586 Background: A major limitation of clinical trials is limited generalizability due to low enrollment of underrepresented minorities (URM). The percentage of patients who are non-English speaking (NES) is higher in URM and language barriers may discourage providers to offer participation in clinical trials. We have developed an artificial intelligence-based system to identify patients eligible for clinical trials, Clinical Trials Patient Matching (CTPM). This platform offers an ideal opportunity to explore bias in enrolling patients on clinical trials (CT). Among patients identified by CTPM as eligible for CT we assessed the impact of NES on trial enrollment. Methods: Individual algorithms were constructed within CTPM to identify patients potentially eligible for two trials open at Yale Cancer Center, DARE (NCT04567420) and EMBER-4 (NCT05514054). Eligibility was confirmed by Clinical Trials Office staff and notification of eligibility was communicated to the treating provider. Retrospectively, we evaluated the impact of NES status on clinical trial enrollment. This analysis occurred between 9/1/2022 and 11/30/2023 and all study-related activities were approved by the Yale IRB. Results: Out of the 13,466 unique patients presenting to the Yale Cancer Center and Smilow Cancer Network breast program within the period of study, 5.1% were NES and 94.9% were English speaking (ES). Of the patients identified by CTPM as eligible for the 2 clinical trials 7.9% were NES and 92.14% were ES. However, out of patients enrolled, only 1.59% were NES and 98.41% were ES. For the DARE trial, enrollment rate was 38.3% for ES vs 0% for NES (p=0.0081). For the EMBER4 trial, enrollment was 13.4% for ES vs 14.3% for NES (p=1.0). The aggregate data for both trials revealed an enrollment rate of 29.4% for ES vs 5.6% for NES (p=0.0285). Conclusions: We found that patients who identify as NES were less likely to be enrolled in cancer clinical trials. CTPM appears to be an effective tool to prospectively identify underrepresented populations in clinical trials and serve as a platform for developing interventions to address disparities in trial participation, including language. [Table: see text]

Bridging gaps with navigator support and its influence on breast cancer clinical trial matching and accessibility.

e13509 Background: Breast cancer patients face challenges navigating clinical trials. Online trial matching platforms like BreastCancerTrials.org (BCT) and MetastaticTrialSearch (MTS) are important resources to assist patients in identifying suitable clinical trials. However, data collected from users shows a concerning underrepresentation of ethnic minorities using this technology. Acknowledging the need to address this inequality through personalized support, we have incorporated a Clinical Trial Navigator. The navigator has engaged in partnerships with diverse community organizations and is committed to offering continuous support to patients throughout their experience. Methods: We analyzed data from our online trial matching sites spanning the period 2009–2023 (BCT) and data from our new platform MTS covering the years 2018-2023. Users visiting these sites provided details about their breast cancer type and medical history to identify appropriate clinical trials. Demographic information including race, gender, and education level was collected. The utilization and effectiveness of these features in facilitating patient access to relevant clinical trials were evaluated. Results: Analysis of the data reveals information about the characteristics of patients actively using the BreastCancerTrials.org matching service. Although BCT and MTS strives to reach a diverse patient population, 87% of BCT users identified as white women, with African American users making up only 5%. Education level of all users was high with 73% stating a college degree or higher. On the MTS site, 80% of users identified as white, while 7% identified as African American.This emphasized the need for specific interventions designed to tackle the underrepresentation of ethnic minorities and underserved populations when utilizing BCT and MTS. Conclusions: For more than 15 years, BCT has offered a patient-centric trial matching service. Within the last six years, with the enhancements to the website, BCT has served over 281,197 users. To improve minority enrollment in trials, we have developed a comprehensive clinical trial breast cancer navigation program. We plan to use this program to expand our outreach to underserved populations. Navigators can enhance patient engagement, help patients make informed decisions, and ultimately improve access to participation in breast cancer research.

Engagement of culturally diverse communities in primary care research.

The underrepresentation of ethnic minorities and low-income groups in primary care (PC) research hinders the development of effective treatments for diverse populations. To develop a framework that general practice staff and researchers can use to improve the participation of underserved groups in PC research. This study was undertaken across 10 GP practices in South London serving 150 658 patients. Practices are distributed across ethnically diverse and highly deprived communities. A mixed-methods approach was utilised. Retrospective data were collected on patient participation in research studies across the practices between July 2022 and July 2023. Professional and patient focus groups, and a patient questionnaire, were undertaken to understand awareness and knowledge of, enablers for, and barriers to research participation. Over the 12-month period, 627 patients participated in PC research studies across the 10 practices. Black African and Black Caribbean patients accounted for 26% of the practices' patient population but were significantly underrepresented in research, comprising only 11% of participants. Patients of Asian backgrounds accounted for 11% of the practices' population but made up 20% of research participants. Lack of awareness of research participation opportunities, fear of side effects, language barriers, and mistrust of researchers were some of the barriers to participation. Participants highlighted that trust in their GP, education, and transparency of research processes were key to building long-term engagement. This study provides insights into poor recruitment of specific ethnic minorities into primary care studies. The authors identified adaptations to research engagement activities, which are required to ensure that participation is improved.

Specialty Care Referral for Underrepresented Minorities Living with HIV in the United States: Experiences, Barriers, and Facilitators.

The increased incidence of chronic diseases among people with HIV (PWH) is poised to increase the need for specialty care outside of HIV treatment settings. To reduce outcome disparities for HIV-associated comorbidities in the United States, it is critical to optimize access to and the quality of specialty care for underrepresented racial and ethnic minority (URM) individuals with HIV. We explored the experiences of URM individuals with HIV and other comorbidities in the specialty care setting during their initial and follow-up appointments. We conducted qualitative interviews with participants at three large academic medical centers in the United States with comprehensive health care delivery systems between November 2019 and March 2020. The data were analyzed using applied thematic analysis. A total of 27 URM individuals with HIV were interviewed. The majority were Black or African American and were referred to cardiology specialty care. Most of the participants had positive experiences in the specialty care setting. Facilitators of the referral process included their motivation to stay healthy, referral assistance from HIV providers, access to reliable transportation, and proximity to the specialty care health center. Few participants faced individual, interpersonal, and structural barriers, including the perception of individual and facility stigma toward PWH, a lack of transportation, and a lack of rapport with providers. Future case studies are needed for those URM individuals with HIV who face barriers and negative experiences. Interventions that involve PWH and health care providers in specialty care settings with a focus on individual- and structural-level stigma can support the optimal use of specialty care.

Spirometry Interpretation After Implementation of Race-Neutral Reference Equations in Children

The implications of adopting race-neutral reference equations on spirometry interpretation in children remain unknown. To examine how spirometry results and patterns change when transitioning from Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) race-specific reference equations (GLIR, 2012) to GLI race-neutral reference equations (GLIN, 2023). Cross-sectional study of spirometry tests conducted in children aged 6 to 21 years between 2012 and 2022 at 2 large academic pediatric institutions in the US. Data were analyzed from September 2023 to March 2024. Data on participant characteristics and raw test measurements were collected. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC z scores and percent predicted were calculated using both GLIR and GLIN. In addition, test results were categorized into normal, obstructive, suspected restrictive, mixed, suspected dysanapsis, and uncategorized patterns based on z scores calculated using GLIR or GLIN. For each spirometry result, the difference between z scores and percent predicted when transitioning from GLIR to GLIN was calculated. The proportion of tests with a normal pattern and individual spirometry patterns changed by GLI reference equation applied were also examined. Data from 24 630 children were analyzed (mean [SD] age, 12.1 [3.8] years). There were 3848 Black children (15.6%), 19 503 White children (79.2%), and 1279 children of other races (5.2%). Following implementation of GLIN, FEV1 and FVC z scores decreased in Black children (mean difference, -0.814; 95% CI, -0.823 to -0.806; P < .001; and -0.911; 95% CI, -0.921 to -0.902; P < .001, respectively), while FEV1 and FVC z scores slightly increased (0.073; 95% CI, 0.069 to 0.076; P < .001). Similar changes were found when using percent predicted. In Black children, the number of tests with a normal pattern decreased from 2642 (68.7%) to 2383 (61.9%) (χ21 = 204.81; P < .001), mostly due to tests with a normal pattern transitioning to a suspected restrictive or uncategorized pattern. Opposite, albeit smaller, changes in spirometry results and patterns were seen in White children. In adjusted models, Black children had approximately 3-fold higher odds than White children of changing spirometry pattern following the implementation of GLIN (adjusted odds ratio, 3.15; 95% CI, 2.86 to 3.48; P < .001). Pronounced differences in spirometry results and patterns were found when switching between GLI reference equations, which markedly differed by race. These findings suggest that the implementation of GLIN is likely to change the treatment of children with chronic lung diseases that are more prevalent in underrepresented minorities, such as asthma.

Advancing Diversity in Aging and Alzheimer's Disease Research and Clinical Care: Lessons Learned from Educational and Career Trajectories of Recent Mentorship Program Graduates.

Underrepresented minorities (URMs) are disproportionately affected with aging-related conditions and have inadequate representation in gerontology and geriatrics professions. The Mentorship for Advancing Undergraduate Research on Aging (MADURA) Program aims to increase inclusion of URMs by improving undergraduate retention and success, increasing rates of graduate/medical school applications, and increasing entry into aging research/clinical employment. MADURA provides cohorts with faculty and peer mentorship, research skills training, paid research lab experiences and professional development opportunities. About 87% of the 2023 MADURA cohort intends to take 1+ year after receiving a Bachelor's degree, to prepare for graduate education. Planned activities include gaining work experience, preparing for standardized tests, and obtaining formal training to strengthen graduate/medical school applications. In addition to immediate graduate program acceptances, other student outcomes should be assessed. Longitudinal research on the effectiveness of various post-graduation pathways could assist Mentorship programs in supporting their graduates' longer term educational and career goal attainment.

Minorities Face Delays to Pancreatic Cancer Treatment Regardless of Diagnosis Setting

IntroductionOur analysis was designed to characterize the demographics and disparities between the diagnosis of pancreas cancer during emergency presentation (EP) and the outpatient setting (OP) and to see the impact of our institutions pancreatic multidisciplinary clinic (PMDC) on these disparities.MethodsInstitutional review board-approved retrospective review of our institutional cancer registry and PMDC databases identified patients diagnosed/treated for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma between 2014 and 2022. Chi-square tests were used for categorical variables, and one-way ANOVA with a Bonferroni correction was used for continuous variables. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.ResultsA total of 286 patients met inclusion criteria. Eighty-nine patients (31.1%) were underrepresented minorities (URM). Fifty-seven (64.0%) URMs presented during an EP versus 100 (50.8%) non-URMs (p = 0.037). Forty-one (46.1%) URMs were reviewed at PMDC versus 71 (36.0%) non-URMs (p = 0.10). No differences in clinical and pathologic stage between the cohorts (p = 0.28) were present. URMs took 22 days longer on average to receive treatment (66.5 days vs. 44.8 days, p = 0.003) in the EP cohort and 18 days longer in OP cohort (58.0 days vs. 40.5 days, p < 0.001) compared with non-URMs. Pancreatic Multidisciplinary Clinic enrollment in EP cohort eliminated the difference in time to treatment between cohorts (48.3 days vs. 37.0 days; p = 0.151).ResultsUnderrepresented minorities were more likely to be diagnosed via EP and showed delayed times to treatment compared with non-URM counterparts. Our PMDC alleviated some of these observed disparities. Future studies are required to elucidate the specific factors that resulted in these findings and to identify solutions.

Summer undergraduate biomedical research program for underrepresented minority students in a rural, low-income state

IntroductionDiversity can enhance the agenda and quality of biomedical research, but a dearth of underrepresented minorities and women serve as biomedical researchers. The study purpose was to examine the impact of the a summer undergraduate research program on self-efficacy in research, scientific communication, and leadership as well as scientific identity, valuing objectives of the scientific community, and intent to pursue a biomedical research career.MethodsUnderrepresented minority and female undergraduate students participated in a mentored research experience in a rural, low-income state.ResultsStudents' self-efficacy in research, scientific communication, and leadership as well as scientific identity, valuing objectives of the scientific community, and intent to pursue a biomedical research career increased post-program compared to pre-program.ConclusionThis study supports implementation of a biomedical summer undergraduate research program for URM and women in a poor, rural, settings.

Perceived Effectiveness of a Surgical High School Outreach Program on Career Trajectory of Underserved High School Students

Background: The United States faces a significant physician shortage, projecting a need for 52,000 more primary care doctors by 2025.1 Underserved communities are disproportionately affected by this shortage. With underrepresented minority healthcare providers being significantly more likely to practice in underserved communities, it is essential to increase diversity in medicine.2–4 High school outreach programs introducing teenagers from minority populations to the medical field may increase availability of healthcare in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas. Our goal was to determine whether participants in the Urology High School Outreach Program experienced increased interest in pursuing a career in medicine, or STEM-related fields after receiving mentorship and exposure to the medical field. Methods: 138 underserved high school students participating in a one-day Urology High School Outreach Program (HSOP) took a pre-survey prior to a physician-led lecture, and five urology-related surgical techniques workshop stations, led by medical students. The sessions culminated with a Q&amp;A panel with the medical students, followed by the post-survey. Results: Of the 138 students that participated in the pre-survey, 110 students (79.7%) answered the post-survey. Analysis of these survey responses revealed that the Urology HSOP predominantly served a demographic consisting of Hispanic (39.1%) and Asian (32.7%) backgrounds. Question One, pertaining to the likelihood of pursuing a career in healthcare, saw a statistically significant average increase of 0.11 out of 5 (p=0.014). Question Two, pertaining to the likelihood of pursuing a career in STEM, saw the largest significant average increase of 0.34 out of 5 (p&lt;0.00001). Question Three, pertaining to interest in developing new technology, saw a statistically significant average increase of 0.28 out of 5 (p=0.001). Conclusion: In summary, a significant increase in interest towards STEM and medicine careers emerged among Urology High School Outreach Program participants. Further investigation is warranted to ascertain whether these changes are limited to the underrepresented demographic, or extend to all program participants.