Under-replicated DNA Research Articles

The RAD51 recombinase protects mitotic chromatin in human cells

The RAD51 recombinase plays critical roles in safeguarding genome integrity, which is fundamentally important for all living cells. While interphase functions of RAD51 in maintaining genome stability are well-characterised, its role in mitosis remains contentious. In this study, we show that RAD51 protects under-replicated DNA in mitotic human cells and, in this way, promotes mitotic DNA synthesis (MiDAS) and successful chromosome segregation. In cells experiencing mild replication stress, MiDAS was detected irrespective of mitotically generated DNA damage. MiDAS broadly required de novo RAD51 recruitment to single-stranded DNA, which was supported by the phosphorylation of RAD51 by the key mitotic regulator Polo-like kinase 1. Importantly, acute inhibition of MiDAS delayed anaphase onset and induced centromere fragility, suggesting a mechanism that prevents the satisfaction of the spindle assembly checkpoint while chromosomal replication remains incomplete. This study hence identifies an unexpected function of RAD51 in promoting genomic stability in mitosis.

Mind the replication gap.

Unlike bacteria, mammalian cells need to complete DNA replication before segregating their chromosomes for the maintenance of genome integrity. Thus, cells have evolved efficient pathways to restore stalled and/or collapsed replication forks during S-phase, and when necessary, also to delay cell cycle progression to ensure replication completion. However, strong evidence shows that cells can proceed to mitosis with incompletely replicated DNA when under mild replication stress (RS) conditions. Consequently, the incompletely replicated genomic gaps form, predominantly at common fragile site regions, where the converging fork-like DNA structures accumulate. These branched structures pose a severe threat to the faithful disjunction of chromosomes as they physically interlink the partially duplicated sister chromatids. In this review, we provide an overview discussing how cells respond and deal with the under-replicated DNA structures that escape from the S/G2 surveillance system. We also focus on recent research of a mitotic break-induced replication pathway (also known as mitotic DNA repair synthesis), which has been proposed to operate during prophase in an attempt to finish DNA synthesis at the under-replicated genomic regions. Finally, we discuss recent data on how mild RS may cause chromosome instability and mutations that accelerate cancer genome evolution.

Identifying New Cofactors for Cytokinetic Abscission

A single cell division in the presence of incompletely segregated chromatin can result in chromosome beaks, triggering a chain of events that culminate in chromosomal damage and rapid genome evolution, which are classic hallmarks of cancer. In order to maintain genomic integrity, the cell has evolved a cell cycle checkpoint known as the abscission checkpoint. This checkpoint detects persistent mitotic errors such as incompletely segregated chromosomes, misformed nuclear pores, under-replicated DNA and tension at the intercellular bridge. Once detected, these errors trigger an abscission arrest to allow cells a chance to correct and prevent their transmission to daughter cells. How the cell integrates these diverse signals into a concerted response to delay abscission is not well understood. However, it is well-known that progression through abscission is regulated in part through the sequential action of several key kinases including Aurora B, that inhibit the membrane fission activity of ESCRT-III proteins, which localize to the intercellular bridge connecting daughter cells and are required for completing cell division. In addition to providing the mechanical force necessary for membrane constriction and fission, ESCRT-III proteins recruit essential cofactors via a complex set of interactions between their C-terminal MIT-Interacting Motifs (MIMs) and proteins that contain Microtubule Interacting and Trafficking (MIT) domains. In order to discover new activities required to correctly perform abscission, we mapped the complete network of ESCRT-III binding partners for ~20 human MIT domain-containing proteins. We then focused on three of these MIT proteins: a protease, Calpain-7, and two microtubule severing AAA-ATPases, Katanin, and Spastin. For each protein, we mapped the binding site for their respective ESCRT-III binding partners and tested whether they function in abscission or the abscission checkpoint. Our studies reveal Spastin and Calpain-7 are required for maintaining the abscission checkpoint, with Calpain-7 having an additional role in abscission. These studies biochemically describe how ESCRT-III proteins can recruit multiple different proteins to the intercellular bridge and highlight the importance of these interactions in supplying additional enzymatic activities that promote faithful abscission.

Targeting IGF Perturbs Global Replication through Ribonucleotide Reductase Dysfunction.

Inhibition of IGF receptor (IGF1R) delays repair of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSB), prompting us to investigate whether IGF1R influences endogenous DNA damage. Here we demonstrate that IGF1R inhibition generates endogenous DNA lesions protected by 53BP1 bodies, indicating under-replicated DNA. In cancer cells, inhibition or depletion of IGF1R delayed replication fork progression accompanied by activation of ATR-CHK1 signaling and the intra-S-phase checkpoint. This phenotype reflected unanticipated regulation of global replication by IGF1 mediated via AKT, MEK/ERK, and JUN to influence expression of ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) subunit RRM2. Consequently, inhibition or depletion of IGF1R downregulated RRM2, compromising RNR function and perturbing dNTP supply. The resulting delay in fork progression and hallmarks of replication stress were rescued by RRM2 overexpression, confirming RRM2 as the critical factor through which IGF1 regulates replication. Suspecting existence of a backup pathway protecting from toxic sequelae of replication stress, targeted compound screens in breast cancer cells identified synergy between IGF inhibition and ATM loss. Reciprocal screens of ATM-proficient/deficient fibroblasts identified an IGF1R inhibitor as the top hit. IGF inhibition selectively compromised growth of ATM-null cells and spheroids and caused regression of ATM-null xenografts. This synthetic-lethal effect reflected conversion of single-stranded lesions in IGF-inhibited cells into toxic DSBs upon ATM inhibition. Overall, these data implicate IGF1R in alleviating replication stress, and the reciprocal IGF:ATM codependence we identify provides an approach to exploit this effect in ATM-deficient cancers. SIGNIFICANCE: This study identifies regulation of ribonucleotide reductase function and dNTP supply by IGFs and demonstrates that IGF axis blockade induces replication stress and reciprocal codependence on ATM. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/canres/81/8/2128/F1.large.jpg.

Ongoing replication forks delay the nuclear envelope breakdown upon mitotic entry

DNA replication is a major contributor to genomic instability, and protection against DNA replication perturbation is essential for normal cell division. Certain types of replication stress agents, such as aphidicolin and hydroxyurea, have been shown to cause reversible replication fork stalling, wherein replisome complexes are stably maintained with competence to restart in the S phase of the cell cycle. If these stalled forks persist into the M phase without a replication restart, replisomes are disassembled in a p97-dependent pathway and under-replicated DNA is subjected to mitotic DNA repair synthesis. Here, using Xenopus egg extracts, we investigated the consequences that arise when stalled forks are released simultaneously with the induction of mitosis. Ara-cytidine-5′-triphosphate–induced stalled forks were able to restart with the addition of excess dCTP during early mitosis before the nuclear envelope breakdown (NEB). However, stalled forks could no longer restart efficiently after the NEB. Although replisome complexes were finally disassembled in a p97-dependent manner during mitotic progression whether or not fork stalling was relieved, the timing of the NEB was delayed with the ongoing forks, rather than the stalled forks, and the delay was dependent on Wee1/Myt1 kinase activities. Thus, ongoing DNA replication was found to be directly linked to the regulation of Wee1/Myt1 kinases to modulate cyclin-dependent kinase activities because of which DNA replication and mitosis occur in a mutually exclusive and sequential manner.

Mus81-Eme1-dependent aberrant processing of DNA replication intermediates in mitosis impairs genome integrity.

Chromosome instability (CIN) underpins cancer evolution and is associated with drug resistance and poor prognosis. Understanding the mechanistic basis of CIN is thus a priority. The structure-specific endonuclease Mus81-Eme1 is known to prevent CIN. Intriguingly, however, here we show that the aberrant processing of late replication intermediates by Mus81-Eme1 is a source of CIN. Upon depletion of checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1), Mus81-Eme1 cleaves under-replicated DNA engaged in mitotic DNA synthesis, leading to chromosome segregation defects. Supplementing cells with nucleosides allows the completion of mitotic DNA synthesis, restraining Mus81-Eme1-dependent DNA damage in mitosis and the ensuing CIN. We found no correlation between CIN arising from nucleotide shortage in mitosis and cell death, which were selectively linked to DNA damage load in mitosis and S phase, respectively. Our findings imply the possibility of optimizing Chk1-directed therapies by inducing cell death while curtailing CIN, a common side effect of chemotherapy.

Under-Replicated DNA: The Byproduct of Large Genomes?

Simple SummaryHigher eukaryotic cells frequently enter mitosis with a certain load of under-replicated DNA, also referred to as unreplicated DNA, due to incomplete genomic DNA replication during the previous S phase. Double replication fork stalling events, when two converging forks irreversibly stall with no replication origin in between them, seem to be one of the major drivers of incomplete genomic replication in S phase. Genome stability is yet maintained in the vast majority of cells implying that cells must possess dedicated post-replicative mechanisms that allow for faithful repair of these seemingly unavoidable errors. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms or events that cause, regulate and repair under-replicated DNA in eukaryotic cells.In this review, we provide an overview of how proliferating eukaryotic cells overcome one of the main threats to genome stability: incomplete genomic DNA replication during S phase. We discuss why it is currently accepted that double fork stalling (DFS) events are unavoidable events in higher eukaryotes with large genomes and which responses have evolved to cope with its main consequence: the presence of under-replicated DNA (UR-DNA) outside S phase. Particular emphasis is placed on the processes that constrain the detrimental effects of UR-DNA. We discuss how mitotic DNA synthesis (MiDAS), mitotic end joining events and 53BP1 nuclear bodies (53BP1-NBs) deal with such specific S phase DNA replication remnants during the subsequent phases of the cell cycle.

Telomere replication—When the going gets tough

Telomeres consist of repetitive tracts of DNA that shield a chromosome’s contents from erosion and replicative attrition. However, telomeres are also late-replicating regions of the genome in which a myriad of replicative obstructions reside. The obstacles contained within telomeres, as well as their genomic location, drive replicative stalling and subsequent fork collapse in these regions. Consequently, large scale deletions, under-replicated DNA, translocations, and fusion events arise following telomere replication failure. Further, under-replicated DNA and telomere fusions that are permitted to enter mitosis will produce mitotic DNA bridges — known drivers of genetic loss and chromothripsis. Thus, aberrant telomere replication promotes genomic instability, which, in turn leads either to cellular death, senescence or oncogenic transformation. The importance of these issues for organismal well-being necessitates a need for resolute telomere maintenance. Here, we describe recent advances in identifying and understanding the molecular mechanisms that are in place in human cells to escort the replisome through the telomere’s unwieldy structures and repetitive sequences. Finally, we review the pathways that combat the deleterious outcomes that occur when telomeric replication forks do collapse.

Mechanisms of eukaryotic replisome disassembly.

DNA replication is a complex process that needs to be executed accurately before cell division in order to maintain genome integrity. DNA replication is divided into three main stages: initiation, elongation and termination. One of the key events during initiation is the assembly of the replicative helicase at origins of replication, and this mechanism has been very well described over the last decades. In the last six years however, researchers have also focused on deciphering the molecular mechanisms underlying the disassembly of the replicative helicase during termination. Similar to replisome assembly, the mechanism of replisome disassembly is strictly regulated and well conserved throughout evolution, although its complexity increases in higher eukaryotes. While budding yeast rely on just one pathway for replisome disassembly in S phase, higher eukaryotes evolved an additional mitotic pathway over and above the default S phase specific pathway. Moreover, replisome disassembly has been recently found to be a key event prior to the repair of certain DNA lesions, such as under-replicated DNA in mitosis and inter-strand cross-links (ICLs) in S phase. Although replisome disassembly in human cells has not been characterised yet, they possess all of the factors involved in these pathways in model organisms, and de-regulation of many of them are known to contribute to tumorigenesis and other pathological conditions.

Working on Genomic Stability: From the S-Phase to Mitosis.

Fidelity in chromosome duplication and segregation is indispensable for maintaining genomic stability and the perpetuation of life. Challenges to genome integrity jeopardize cell survival and are at the root of different types of pathologies, such as cancer. The following three main sources of genomic instability exist: DNA damage, replicative stress, and chromosome segregation defects. In response to these challenges, eukaryotic cells have evolved control mechanisms, also known as checkpoint systems, which sense under-replicated or damaged DNA and activate specialized DNA repair machineries. Cells make use of these checkpoints throughout interphase to shield genome integrity before mitosis. Later on, when the cells enter into mitosis, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) is activated and remains active until the chromosomes are properly attached to the spindle apparatus to ensure an equal segregation among daughter cells. All of these processes are tightly interconnected and under strict regulation in the context of the cell division cycle. The chromosomal instability underlying cancer pathogenesis has recently emerged as a major source for understanding the mitotic processes that helps to safeguard genome integrity. Here, we review the special interconnection between the S-phase and mitosis in the presence of under-replicated DNA regions. Furthermore, we discuss what is known about the DNA damage response activated in mitosis that preserves chromosomal integrity.

RIF1 promotes replication fork protection and efficient restart to maintain genome stability

Homologous recombination (HR) and Fanconi Anemia (FA) pathway proteins in addition to their DNA repair functions, limit nuclease-mediated processing of stalled replication forks. However, the mechanism by which replication fork degradation results in genome instability is poorly understood. Here, we identify RIF1, a non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) factor, to be enriched at stalled replication forks. Rif1 knockout cells are proficient for recombination, but displayed degradation of reversed forks, which depends on DNA2 nuclease activity. Notably, RIF1-mediated protection of replication forks is independent of its function in NHEJ, but depends on its interaction with Protein Phosphatase 1. RIF1 deficiency delays fork restart and results in exposure of under-replicated DNA, which is the precursor of subsequent genomic instability. Our data implicate RIF1 to be an essential factor for replication fork protection, and uncover the mechanisms by which unprotected DNA replication forks can lead to genome instability in recombination-proficient conditions.

Dicer prevents genome instability in response to replication stress.

Dicer, an endoribonuclease best-known for its role in microRNA biogenesis and RNA interference pathway, has been shown to play a role in the DNA damage response and repair of double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs) in mammalian cells. However, it remains unknown whether Dicer is also important to preserve genome integrity upon replication stress. To address this question, we focused our study on common fragile sites (CFSs), which are susceptible to breakage after replication stress. We show that inhibition of the Dicer pathway leads to an increase in CFS expression upon induction of replication stress and to an accumulation of 53BP1 nuclear bodies, indicating transmission of replication-associated damage. We also show that in absence of a functional Dicer or Drosha, the assembly into nuclear foci of the Fanconi anemia (FA) protein FANCD2 and of the replication and checkpoint factor TopBP1 in response to replication stress is impaired, and the activation of the S-phase checkpoint is defective. Based on these results, we propose that Dicer pre-vents genomic instability after replication stress, by allowing the proper recruitment to stalled forks of proteins that are necessary to maintain replication fork stability and activate the S-phase checkpoint, thus limiting cells from proceeding into mitosis with under-replicated DNA.

Wee1 Rather Than Plk1 Is Inhibited by AZD1775 at Therapeutically Relevant Concentrations.

Wee1 kinase is an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk)s, crucial cell cycle progression drivers. By phosphorylating cdk1 at tyrosine 15, Wee1 inhibits activation of cyclin B-cdk1 (Cdk1), preventing cells from entering mitosis with incompletely replicated or damaged DNA. Thus, inhibiting Wee1, alone or in combination with DNA damaging agents, can kill cancer cells by mitotic catastrophe, a tumor suppressive response that follows mitosis onset in the presence of under-replicated or damaged DNA. AZD1775, an orally available Wee1 inhibitor, has entered clinical trials for cancer treatment following this strategy, with promising results. Recently, however, AZD1775 has been shown to inhibit also the polo-like kinase homolog Plk1 in vitro, casting doubts on its mechanism of action. Here we asked whether, in the clinically relevant concentration range, AZD1775 inhibited Wee1 or Plk1 in transformed and non-transformed human cells. We found that in the clinically relevant, nanomolar, concentration range AZD1775 inhibited Wee1 rather than Plk1. In addition, AZD1775 treatment accelerated mitosis onset overriding the DNA replication checkpoint and hastened Plk1-dependent phosphorylation. On the contrary selective Plk1 inhibition exerted opposite effects. Thus, at therapeutic concentrations, AZD1775 inhibited Wee1 rather than Plk1. This information will help to better interpret results obtained by using AZD1775 both in the clinical and experimental settings and provide a stronger rationale for combination therapies.

Multiple Defects Sensitize p53-Deficient Head and Neck Cancer Cells to the WEE1 Kinase Inhibition.

The p53 gene is the most commonly mutated gene in solid tumors, but leveraging p53 status in therapy remains a challenge. Previously, we determined that p53 deficiency sensitizes head and neck cancer cells to AZD1775, a WEE1 kinase inhibitor, and translated our findings into a phase I clinical trial. Here, we investigate how p53 affects cellular responses to AZD1775 at the molecular level. We found that p53 modulates both replication stress and mitotic deregulation triggered by WEE1 inhibition. Without p53, slowing of replication forks due to replication stress is exacerbated. Abnormal, γH2AX-positive mitoses become more common and can proceed with damaged or underreplicated DNA. p53-deficient cells fail to properly recover from WEE1 inhibition and exhibit fewer 53BP1 nuclear bodies despite evidence of unresolved damage. A faulty G1-S checkpoint propagates this damage into the next division. Together, these deficiencies can intensify damages in each consecutive cell cycle in the drug. IMPLICATIONS: The data encourage the use of AZD1775 in combination with genotoxic modalities against p53-deficient head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Under-replicated DNA gets a second chance.

DNA replication of under-replicated loci can occur after mitosis in 53BP1-contaning nuclear bodies and is required for genome stability.

53BP1 nuclear bodies enforce replication timing at under-replicated DNA to limit heritable DNA damage.

Failure to complete DNA replication is a stochastic by-product of genome doubling in almost every cell cycle. During mitosis, under-replicated DNA (UR-DNA) is converted into DNA lesions, which are inherited by daughter cells and sequestered in 53BP1 nuclear bodies (53BP1-NBs). The fate of such cells remains unknown. Here, we show that the formation of 53BP1-NBs interrupts the chain of iterative damage intrinsically embedded in UR-DNA. Unlike clastogen-induced 53BP1 foci that are repaired throughout interphase, 53BP1-NBs restrain replication of the embedded genomic loci until late S phase, thus enabling the dedicated RAD52-mediated repair of UR-DNA lesions. The absence or malfunction of 53BP1-NBs causes premature replication of the affected loci, accompanied by genotoxic RAD51-mediated recombination. Thus, through adjusting replication timing and repair pathway choice at under-replicated loci, 53BP1-NBs enable the completion of genome duplication of inherited UR-DNA and prevent the conversion of stochastic under-replications into genome instability.

Inhibiting Wee1 and ATR kinases produces tumor-selective synthetic lethality and suppresses metastasis.

We used the cancer-intrinsic property of oncogene-induced DNA damage as the base for a conditional synthetic lethality approach. To target mechanisms important for cancer cell adaptation to genotoxic stress and thereby to achieve cancer cell-specific killing, we combined inhibition of the kinases ATR and Wee1. Wee1 regulates cell cycle progression, whereas ATR is an apical kinase in the DNA-damage response. In an orthotopic breast cancer model, tumor-selective synthetic lethality of the combination of bioavailable ATR and Wee1 inhibitors led to tumor remission and inhibited metastasis with minimal side effects. ATR and Wee1 inhibition had a higher synergistic effect in cancer stem cells than in bulk cancer cells, compensating for the lower sensitivity of cancer stem cells to the individual drugs. Mechanistically, the combination treatment caused cells with unrepaired or under-replicated DNA to enter mitosis leading to mitotic catastrophe. As these inhibitors of ATR and Wee1 are already in phase I/II clinical trials, this knowledge could soon be translated into the clinic, especially as we showed that the combination treatment targets a wide range of tumor cells. Particularly, the antimetastatic effect of combined Wee1/ATR inhibition and the low toxicity of ATR inhibitors compared with Chk1 inhibitors have great clinical potential.

Abstract 1356: NSMCE2 enables rescue of collapsed replication forks to prevent mitotic DNA damage

Abstract Background: Replication forks that are persistently blocked cannot restart, even after DNA damage is repaired. These forks are termed collapsed forks. In order to fully duplicate the genome, collapsed forks must be rescued by activation of nearby dormant origins of replication. Homologous recombination (HR) is essential in collapsed-fork rescue. Cells deficient in the SUMO E3 ligase NSMCE2 exhibit mitotic defects, are sensitive to DNA damaging agents, and have defects in HR. Thus, NSMCE2 regulates HR during replication stress, but the molecular mechanisms are poorly understood. In yeasts, hypomorphic NSMCE2 (MMS21) alleles accumulate HR intermediates during replication stress. We therefore hypothesized that NSMCE2 regulates RAD51 function during collapsed fork rescue. Results: It was previously shown that sumoylation of the BLM helicase results in recruitment of RAD51 to stalled forks. Consistent with data in yeast, we found that BLM sumolyation is dependent on NSMCE2. However, contrary to our expectation, we found that the amount of RAD51 protein that accumulated at collapsed forks was over two times greater in NSMCE2-deficient cells than in normal cells. In contrast, the levels of BLM, RPA, single-stranded DNA, and γH2AX at stalled forks is reduced by half. Consistent with the low levels of γH2AX, the double-strand breaks and sister chromatid exchanges that accumulate during collapsed fork rescue were also greatly diminished in NSMCE2-deficient cells. Thus, despite the over-accumulation of RAD51 to sites of collapsed replication forks, cells are unable to perform HR efficiently, indicating that RAD51 is unable to complete its function there. In NSMCE2-deficient cells, the hyper-accumulated RAD51 at collapsed forks persists into mitosis where excess under-replicated DNA causes mitotic DNA damage. Conclusions: The hyper-accumulation of RAD51 at stalled forks we observed in NSMCE2-deficient cells suggests that NSMCE2 is required for the remodeling of collapsed forks that normally leads to the rescue of collapsed forks, namely, the unloading of RAD51, DNA breakage, repair by HR, and completion of DNA synthesis. We suggest that the excess accumulation of RAD51 that is observed in a substantial number of cancers is not sufficient to demonstrate that the cells are HR proficient. The identification of NSMCE2 as a controller of HR-mediated fork rescue also highlights NSMCE2's potential as a new therapeutic target for combinatorial therapy of HR-dependent cancers. Citation Format: Kelvin W. Pond, Christelle DeRenty, Mary K. Yagle, Nathan Ellis. NSMCE2 enables rescue of collapsed replication forks to prevent mitotic DNA damage [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1356.

MUS81 nuclease activity is essential for replication stress tolerance and chromosome segregation in BRCA2-deficient cells

Failure to restart replication forks stalled at genomic regions that are difficult to replicate or contain endogenous DNA lesions is a hallmark of BRCA2 deficiency. The nucleolytic activity of MUS81 endonuclease is required for replication fork restart under replication stress elicited by exogenous treatments. Here we investigate whether MUS81 could similarly facilitate DNA replication in the context of BRCA2 abrogation. Our results demonstrate that replication fork progression in BRCA2-deficient cells requires MUS81. Failure to complete genome replication and defective checkpoint surveillance enables BRCA2-deficient cells to progress through mitosis with under-replicated DNA, which elicits severe chromosome interlinking in anaphase. MUS81 nucleolytic activity is required to activate compensatory DNA synthesis during mitosis and to resolve mitotic interlinks, thus facilitating chromosome segregation. We propose that MUS81 provides a mechanism of replication stress tolerance, which sustains survival of BRCA2-deficient cells and can be exploited therapeutically through development of specific inhibitors of MUS81 nuclease activity.

Rad18-dependent SUMOylation of human specialized DNA polymerase eta is required to prevent under-replicated DNA

Translesion polymerase eta (polη) was characterized for its ability to replicate ultraviolet-induced DNA lesions that stall replicative polymerases, a process promoted by Rad18-dependent PCNA mono-ubiquitination. Recent findings have shown that polη also acts at intrinsically difficult to replicate sequences. However, the molecular mechanisms that regulate its access to these loci remain elusive. Here, we uncover that polη travels with replication forks during unchallenged S phase and this requires its SUMOylation on K163. Abrogation of polη SUMOylation results in replication defects in response to mild replication stress, leading to chromosome fragments in mitosis and damage transmission to daughter cells. Rad18 plays a pivotal role, independently of its ubiquitin ligase activity, acting as a molecular bridge between polη and the PIAS1 SUMO ligase to promote polη SUMOylation. Our results provide the first evidence that SUMOylation represents a new way to target polη to replication forks, independent of the Rad18-mediated PCNA ubiquitination, thereby preventing under-replicated DNA.