Uncontrolled Partial-onset Seizures Research Articles

Development and Validation of a UHPLC-MS/MS-Based Method to Quantify Cenobamate in Human Plasma Samples.

Cenobamate (CNB) is the newest antiseizure medication (ASM) approved by the FDA in 2019 to reduce uncontrolled partial-onset seizures in adult patients. Marketed as Xcopri in the USA or Ontozry in the EU (tablets), its mechanism of action has not been fully understood yet; however, it is known that it inhibits voltage-gated sodium channels and positively modulates the aminobutyric acid (GABA) ion channel. CNB shows 88% of oral bioavailability and is responsible for modifying the plasma concentrations of other co-administered ASMs, such as lamotrigine, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital and the active metabolite of clobazam. It also interferes with CYP2B6 and CYP3A substrates. Nowadays, few methods are reported in the literature to quantify CNB in human plasma. The aim of this study was to develop and validate, according to the most recent guidelines, an analytical method using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) to evaluate CNB dosage in plasma samples. Furthermore, we provided a preliminary clinical application of our methodology by evaluating the pharmacokinetic parameters of CNB in two non-adult patients. Plasma levels were monitored for two months. Preliminary data showed a linear increase in plasma CNB concentrations, in both patients, in agreement with the increase in CNB dosage. A seizure-free state was reported for both patients at the dose of 150 mg per day.

Eslicarbazepine acetate: An efficacy and safety as an antiepileptic drug in clinical trials and open studies

Eslicarbazepine acetate (Zebinix®, ESL), a voltage-gated sodium channel blocker, is a once-daily, orally administered anti-seizure medication available in the EU for use as monotherapy in adults with newly diagnosed partial-onset seizures and as adjunctive therapy in adults, adolescents, and children aged > 6 years with partial-onset seizures. It was approved by the European Medicines Agency and launched onto the European market in 2009.
 This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ESL in the treatment of focal-onset seizures. Our study material consisted of publications, which were found in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase databases. In order to find the proper publications, the search has been conducted with the use of a combination of keywords like: “eslicarbazepine acetate", "focal-onset seizures treatment", "epilepsy treatment", "eslicarbazepine acetate pharmacokinetics”. The first step was to find proper publications from the last 10 years. The second step was to carry out an overview of the found publications.
 Results of mentioned studies proved that for adults with medically uncontrolled partial-onset seizures, ESL monotherapy is well tolerated and effective over the long term, including the patients who transitioned from CBZ-CR monotherapy. Adjunctive ESL demonstrated a sustained therapeutic effect and was well-tolerated, safe, and efficacious during the treatment of adults with partial-onset seizures. Both 800 mg and 1200 mg once-daily doses were well tolerated. Moreover, significant improvements in depressive symptoms and quality of life domains were observed under long-term treatment with ESL.

Safety of cenobamate as adjunctive therapy in adults with uncontrolled focal seizures: Time to onset, duration, and severity of the most common adverse events

Cenobamate is a new antiseizure medication (ASM) approved in the US for uncontrolled partial-onset (focal) seizures in adults. Two international, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with open-label extensions (OLEs; C013/C017) and a large international open-label safety study (C021) demonstrated efficacy and safety. Here we characterize the most common adverse events (AEs) in these studies.

Efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in adolescent patients with epilepsy: Post hoc analysis of six randomized studies

ObjectiveThis post hoc analysis of six randomized, double-blind, Phase II and III studies evaluated efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel (2–12 mg/day) in adolescent patients (aged ≥12 to ≤17 years) with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures, with or without secondarily generalized (SG) seizures, or primary generalized tonic–clonic (PGTC) seizures. MethodsAdolescent patients from Studies 304 (NCT00699972), 305 (NCT00699582), 306 (NCT00700310), 335 (NCT01618695), 235 (NCT01161524), and 332 (NCT01393743) were included. Efficacy assessments (split by seizure type) included median percent change in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline and seizure-freedom rates. Safety assessments (all seizure types combined) included monitoring of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). ResultsThe Safety Analysis Set included 372 adolescent patients (placebo, n = 114; perampanel, n = 258); the Full Analysis Set included 346 patients with partial-onset seizures (placebo, n = 103; perampanel, n = 243), of whom 125 experienced SG seizures during baseline (placebo, n = 37; perampanel, n = 88), and 22 with PGTC seizures (placebo, n = 9; perampanel, n = 13). Compared with placebo, perampanel 8 and 12 mg/day conferred greater median percent reductions in seizure frequency per 28 days for partial-onset seizures (18.0% vs 35.9% and 53.8% [both P < 0.01]) and SG seizures (24.4% vs 72.8% [P < 0.001] and 57.8% [P < 0.01]), and greater seizure-freedom rates (partial-onset: 7.8% vs 13.2% and 11.8% [not statistically significant]; SG: 8.1% vs 40.7% [P < 0.001] and 41.7% [P < 0.01]). For PGTC seizures, and compared with placebo, perampanel 8 mg/day was also associated with greater median percent reductions in seizure frequency per 28 days (29.8% vs 88.0%) and greater seizure-freedom rates (11.1% vs 23.1%). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 76 (66.7%) placebo- and 192 (74.4%) perampanel-treated patients (most common: dizziness, somnolence, headache, and nasopharyngitis). Serious TEAEs occurred in 5 (4.4%) placebo- and 11 (4.3%) perampanel-treated patients. ConclusionsAdjunctive perampanel was efficacious and generally well tolerated in adolescent patients with partial-onset, SG, or PGTC seizures and represents a potentially beneficial treatment option for adolescents with uncontrolled epilepsy.

Evaluation of brivaracetam: a new drug to treat epilepsy

ABSTRACT Introduction: High prevalence of therapy-resistant epilepsy demands development of anticonvulsants with new mechanisms of action. Brivaracetam is an analogue of levetiracetam which binds to the synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) and decreases release of excitatory neurotransmitters. Areas covered: Relevant published studies were searched for by predefined strategy in MEDLINE, EBSCO and SCINDEKS electronic databases. Brivaracetam is effective as adjunctive therapy for uncontrolled partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization in patients 16 years and older with epilepsy. It reduces baseline-adjusted focal seizure frequency per week from 7.3 to 12.8% over placebo. Adverse events rate in patients with brivaracetam is not higher than in patients with placebo. Expert opinion: Brivaracetam is an important step forward in the treatment of therapy-resistant partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization. Its development was systematic and targeted. Due to its efficacy and excellent safety profile, it is likely that brivaracetam will be often prescribed. In future, efficacy and safety of brivaracetam should be tested in monotherapy settings and also in the first-line therapy of partial-onset seizures.

Quality of life, mood and seizure control in patients with brain tumor related epilepsy treated with lacosamide as add-on therapy: A prospective explorative study with a historical control group.

Brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) is often drug resistant and patients can be forced to take polytherapy that can adversely affect their quality of life (QoL). Lacosamide (LCM) is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) used as adjunctive therapy in patients with partial seizures with or without secondary generalization, with a favorable pharmacokinetic profile that seems to be effective and well tolerated. Therefore it represents a possible therapeutic choice for patients with BTRE. We propose a prospective study with a historical control group to evaluate the effect of LCM as add-on therapy on seizure control and quality of life in patients with BTRE. This study has been designed to test the superiority of Lacosamide over Levetiracetam as an add-on. We compared a prospective cohort of 25 patients treated with Lacosamide with a historical control group (n=19) treated with Levetiracetam as an add-on. We recruited 25 adult patients (M 18, F 7; mean age 41.9) affected by BTRE with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures treated with AED polytherapy. We added LCM as an add-on. Patients were evaluated at baseline, after 3months and at 6months. This population has been compared with a historical control group of 19 BTRE adult patients (M 13, F 6; median age 48.0, range: 28-70) with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures treated with LEV as add-on. The patients underwent QoL, mood and adverse events tests (Adverse Event Profile-AEP) and evaluation of seizure frequency. Twelve patients had high grade gliomas, and thirteen had low grade gliomas. During follow-up, thirteen patients underwent chemotherapy, three radiotherapy and five patients had disease progression. Nine patients had simple partial seizures, eight had complex partial seizures, and eight had secondary generalized seizures. Fifteen patients were in monotherapy and ten in polytherapy with AEDs. LCM was added up to reach the maximum dosage of 400mg/die (mean final dose 300mg/die). Four patients dropped out due to poor compliance and 1 for inefficacy. In the historical control group treated with LEV (mean final dose 2000mg/die) 12 patients had high-grade gliomas, and 7 had low grade gliomas. Thirteen patients were in monotherapy and 6 in polytherapy with AEDs. In the 22 patients evaluable of 25 patients treated with LCM, we observed at final follow-up 7 patients seizure free, 12 with a significant reduction of seizures≥50%, 2 stable and 1 patient with number of seizures increased. Mean seizure frequency at baseline compared with baseline period: the mean number of seizures significantly decreased from baseline (9.4) to final follow-up (1.2) (P=0.005). The Responder Rate was 86.4%. Comparing responder rate of 22 evaluable patients with LCM with responder rate of 19 patients with LEV we didn't observe significant differences (p=0.31). In our patients treated with LCM we didn't observe significant difference at 3 and 6months in QoL tests results; we observe a significant reduction in the mean score of Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and Barthel Index (BI) between baseline and 6months of follow-up (KPS p=0.003; BI p=0.007). No clinical side effects were observed. Comparing the LCM with the historical group treated with LEV in add-on, we observed that LCM seems to have a higher clinical efficacy than LEV. In our patients, we did not observe any significant changes in QoL tests, indicating stability in all quality of life domains explored, despite the objective worsening in their functional status. Although this is a small series with a relatively short follow-up, our data indicates that LCM in add-on in patients with BTRE appears to be as effective as LEV in add-on, without impact on mood and quality of life.

Budget impact of perampanel as adjunctive treatment of uncontrolled partial-onset and primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures in the United States.

To evaluate the budget impact (BI) of adopting perampanel for adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures (POS), with or without secondarily generalized seizures, and the adjunctive treatment of primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) in patients 12years or older in the United States. A BI model was developed to estimate the potential BI of adopting adjunctive perampanel from a US payer (direct costs only) and societal (direct and indirect costs) perspective over a 5-year period. Efficacy data for perampanel and antiepileptic drug (AED) maintenance therapy were obtained from perampanel phase III clinical trials. Drug, direct medical (healthcare provider, emergency room, and hospitalizations), and indirect (productivity loss) costs were obtained from appropriate sources (e.g., AnalySource® Online [wholesale acquisition costs], 2013 Optum Insight Clinformatics Database [market share percentages, direct medical costs per unit], and 2011-2013 National Health and Wellness Survey [NHWS; healthcare resource utilization, overall work impairment, and baseline distribution of patients across the 4 health states]). Mapping of seizure frequency to medical resource utilization and work impairment was obtained from Kantar Health's NHWS. In a hypothetical health plan of 1 million members, 660 (0.066%) members ≥12years old had uncontrolled POS (395 [59.8%]) or PGTCS (265 [40.2%]). During the first 5years of adoption of perampanel, absolute BI (including drug, direct medical, and indirect costs) was $852, $2124, $3855, $5318, and $6397, respectively, for a cumulative absolute BI of $18,545. Drug cost was estimated to increase by $13,888, $34,646, $62,863, $86,728, and $104,326, respectively; however, this cost would be mostly offset by decreases in direct medical ($5041, $12,576, $22,818, $31,481, and $37,869, respectively) and indirect ($7995, $19,946, $36,190, $49,929, and $60,060, respectively) costs. Total per-member-per-month cost (drug and direct medical costs) was estimated to increase by $0.0007, $0.0018, $0.0033, $0.0046, and $0.0055 from years 1 to 5. Based on results of this BI model, increased cost of adopting perampanel in a health plan of 1 million members would be minimal for payers, and societal costs would be close to neutral.

Efficacy and safety of adjunctive lacosamide for the treatment of partial-onset seizures in Chinese and Japanese adults: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjunctive lacosamide treatment in Chinese and Japanese adults with uncontrolled focal (partial-onset) seizures (POS), with or without secondary generalization. MethodsA 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (EP0008; NCT01710657) was conducted in patients (aged 16–70 years) with uncontrolled POS and taking 1–3 concomitant antiepileptic drugs from 72 sites across China and Japan. Following an 8-week Baseline period, randomized patients received lacosamide 200mg/day (100mg twice daily), 400mg/day (200mg twice daily), or placebo for 4-week Titration and 12-week Maintenance periods. The primary efficacy variable was the change in POS frequency per 28days from Baseline to Maintenance. ResultsOverall, 692 patients were screened; 548 were randomized to placebo (n=184), lacosamide 200mg/day (n=183), or lacosamide 400mg/day (n=181); 485 (88.5%) completed the study. The median change (range) in POS frequency per 28days from Baseline to Maintenance was −3.33 (−754.3 to 165.2), −4.50 (−97.5 to 28.2), and −1.22 (−93.0 to 39.8) in the lacosamide 200mg/day, 400mg/day, and placebo groups, respectively. Significant percentage reductions in POS frequency over placebo per 28days from Baseline to Maintenance were observed for lacosamide 200mg/day (29.4% [95% CI 18.7–38.7%], p<0.001) and 400mg/day (39.6% [30.5–47.6%], p<0.001). Higher ≥50% and ≥75% responder and seizure freedom rates were observed in lacosamide-treated patients vs placebo. Treatment-emergent adverse events reported by ≥10% of all lacosamide-treated patients occurring at ≥2% difference compared with placebo were dizziness (25.9% vs 9.2%) and somnolence (10.2% vs 3.8%). Dose-proportional pharmacokinetics were consistent with earlier global pivotal trials. ConclusionsAdjunctive lacosamide (200 and 400mg/day) was efficacious in reducing POS frequency in Chinese and Japanese patients with a safety and tolerability profile consistent with the three global pivotal studies.

Adolescent Clinical Development of Ezogabine/Retigabine as Adjunctive Therapy for Partial-Onset Seizures: Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile and safety of ezogabine (EZG)/retigabine (RTG) as adjunctive therapy for uncontrolled partial-onset seizures (POS) in adolescents. METHODS: In this multiple-dose study (NCT01494584), adolescents with POS received EZG/RTG immediate-release tablets three times daily (TID) as adjunctive therapy to 1 to 3 concurrent antiepileptic drugs. The study comprised a screening phase, and a 5- to 8-week treatment phase starting with 100 mg TID up-titrated once weekly by ≤50 mg TID to a maximum dosage of 300 mg TID. There were 8 venous blood samples and 2 finger-prick blood samples collected for PK analysis during 8-hour time periods at the target dosages of 100, 200, and 300 mg TID. RESULTS: This study was terminated prematurely on US Food and Drug Administration advice due to pigmentation/discoloration findings in long-term, open-label extension studies in adults. Five participants (ages 13-16 years) had enrolled in the study. For the EZG/RTG 100-, 200-, and 300-mg doses, the area under the concentration-time curve during the dosage intervals was 1680, 2559, and 3784 ng/hr/mL; maximum plasma concentrations were 370, 536, and 751 ng/mL, and minimum plasma concentrations were 105, 200, and 287 ng/mL, respectively. Venous and finger-prick concentrations of EZG/RTG were similar. No significant adverse events were observed during treatment (133-213 days). CONCLUSIONS: EZG/RTG PK appeared linear across the dosage range of 100 to 300 mg TID in adolescents with POS, and were consistent with adult observations. The small sample size and short study duration preclude conclusions regarding the safety and efficacy of EZG/RTG.

Erratum.

EpilepsiaVolume 57, Issue 7 p. 1203-1203 ErratumFree Access Erratum This article corrects the following: Efficacy and safety of conversion to monotherapy with eslicarbazepine acetate in adults with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures: A randomized historical-control phase III study based in North America Michael R. Sperling, Jay Harvey, Todd Grinnell, Hailong Cheng, David Blum, , Volume 56Issue 4Epilepsia pages: 546-555 First Published online: February 16, 2015 First published: 19 June 2016 https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.13462AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Sperling MR, Harvey J, Grinnell T, Cheng H, Blum D and the 045 Study Team (2015), Efficacy and safety of conversion to monotherapy with eslicarbazepine acetate in adults with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures: A randomized historical-control phase III study based in North America. Epilepsia 2015;56: 546–555. In the above mentioned article there was an error in the ordering of reference numbers 10 and 11. The correct reference numbering is as follows: References 10Nunes T, Rocha JF, Falcão A, et al. Steady-state plasma and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate and oxcarbazepine in healthy volunteers. Epilepsia 2013; 54: 108– 116. 11Bonifacio MJ, Sheridan RD, Parada A, et al. Interaction of the novel anticonvulsant, BIA 2-093, with voltage-gated sodium channels: comparison with carbamazepine. Epilepsia 2001; 42: 600– 608. The authors regret the error. Volume57, Issue7July 2016Pages 1203-1203 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Emerging drugs for partial-onset epilepsy: a review of brivaracetam.

There are more than 12 new antiepileptic drugs approved in the last 2 decades. Even with these newer agents, seizure remission is still unachievable in around 30% of patients with partial-onset seizures (POS). Brivaracetam (BRV) is chemically related to levetiracetam (LEV) and possesses a strong binding affinity for the synaptic vesicle protein 2A tenfold above that of LEV, and other possible modes of antiepileptic actions. BRV is now under Phase III development for POS, but data from one Phase III trial also suggested its potential efficacy for primary generalized seizures. The purpose of this review is to provide updated information on the mechanisms of action of the available antiepileptic drugs, with a focus on BRV to assess its pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability in patients with uncontrolled POS. To date, six Phase IIb and III clinical trials have been performed to investigate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of BRV as an adjunctive treatment for patients with POS. Generally, BRV was well tolerated and did not show significant difference in safety profile, compared to placebo. The efficacy outcomes of BRV, although not consistent across trials, did indicate that BRV was a promising add-on therapy for patients with POS. In conclusion, the many favorable attributes of BRV, like its high oral efficacy, good tolerability, dosing regimen, and minimal drug interaction, make it a promising antiepileptic therapy for patients with uncontrolled partial-onset epilepsy.

A long-term noninterventional safety study of adjunctive lacosamide therapy in patients with epilepsy and uncontrolled partial-onset seizures.

This noninterventional, observational, postauthorization safety study (SP0942, NCT00771927) evaluated the incidence of predefined cardiovascular- (CV) and psychiatric-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), in patients with epilepsy and uncontrolled partial-onset seizures, when initiating adjunctive therapy with lacosamide or another approved antiepileptic drug (AED) according to standard medical practice. Active recording of predefined TEAEs of interest took place at three-monthly recommended visits for up to 12months. Of 1004 patients who received at least one dose of adjunctive AEDs, 511 initially added lacosamide therapy, 493 added another AED, 69 were ≥65years of age, and 72 took concomitant antiarrhythmic drugs. Patients in the lacosamide cohort had a higher median frequency of partial-onset seizures (6.0 versus 3.5 per 28days) despite taking more concomitant AEDs (84.9% versus 66.9% took ≥2) at baseline. Patients who added lacosamide took a modal dose of 200mg/day over the treatment period (n=501), and 50.1% (256/511) completed 12months of treatment. Fifty-one point nine percent (256/493) of patients who added another AED completed the study, with the most commonly added AED being levetiracetam (28.4%). Four patients (0.8%) in each cohort, all <65years of age, reported predefined CV-related TEAEs. None were considered serious or led to discontinuation. One event each of sinus bradycardia (lacosamide), atrioventricular block first degree (lacosamide), and syncope (other AED) were judged to be treatment-related. Another patient in the other AED cohort reported bradycardia while taking concomitant antiarrhythmic drugs. Predefined psychiatric-related TEAEs were reported by 21 patients (4.1%) in the lacosamide cohort and 27 patients (5.5%) in the other AED cohort. Depression was the most common to be treatment-related (7/11 and 12/18 of patients reporting treatment-related psychiatric TEAEs, respectively). Serious psychiatric-related TEAEs were reported by four patients who added lacosamide (two cases of depression, two of suicide attempt) and one who added another AED (depression). Seven deaths occurred, all of which were considered unrelated/unlikely related to study medication. This thorough evaluation revealed a low incidence of predefined CV- and psychiatric-related TEAEs in patients taking adjunctive AED therapy according to standard medical practice. No specific safety concerns related to adjunctive lacosamide therapy were noted.

Effect of Rifampin on the Disposition of Brivaracetam in Human Subjects: Further Insights into Brivaracetam Hydrolysis.

Brivaracetam (BRV) is a high-affinity synaptic vesicle protein 2A ligand developed for the treatment of uncontrolled partial-onset seizures. The present phase I, open-label, two-way crossover study was designed to assess the effect of rifampin on the pharmacokinetics of BRV and its hydroxy (BRV-OH), acid (BRV-AC), and hydroxy acid (BRV-OHAC) metabolites. Twenty-six healthy subjects received BRV (150-mg single oral dose) either alone or following 5 days of rifampin 600 mg/day. BRV and its metabolites were examined for their plasma profiles and urinary excretion. Pharmacokinetic modeling was developed to estimate the rate constants of the various metabolic routes. Parallel in vitro assays were conducted to characterize the hydrolysis of BRV to BRV-AC as well as to identify any potential effect of rifampin on the hydrolysis reaction. Rifampin did not significantly affect the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of BRV, but decreased its area under the curve (AUC) by 45%. In addition, rifampin significantly increased the AUC of BRV-OH (+109%), decreased the AUC of BRV-AC (-53%), but had little effect on BRV-OHAC (-10%). In vitro assays showed that the major urinary metabolite BRV-AC (33% of the dose) was likely to be formed by amidase EC 3.5.1.4. In vitro data indicated that the enzyme was not significantly inhibited nor induced by rifampin. Modeling confirmed that all of the observed changes in vivo were secondary to the induction of the CYP2C19-mediated hydroxylation of BRV to BRV-OH (3.7-fold increase in the rate constant).

Brivaracetam: First Global Approval.

Brivaracetam (Briviact(®)), a 4-n-propyl analogue of levetiracetam developed by UCB Pharma, has been approved in the EU as an adjunctive therapy for the treatment of partial-onset seizures. Brivaracetam binds to synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2a (SV2A) in the brain with greater selectivity and 15- to 30-fold higher affinity than levetiracetam, as demonstrated in preclinical models, and has demonstrated efficacy in reducing the frequency of partial onset seizures in clinical trials. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of brivaracetam leading to this first approval for use as adjunctive therapy for uncontrolled partial-onset seizures in adults with epilepsy.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjunctive brivaracetam in adult patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures.

Brivaracetam (BRV), a selective and high-affinity synaptic vesicle protein 2A ligand, is in development as adjunctive treatment for partial-onset (focal) seizures (POS). This phase 3 study (N01358; NCT01261325) aimed to confirm the efficacy and safety/tolerability of BRV in adults (≥ 16-80 years) with POS. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study enrolled patients with uncontrolled POS despite ongoing treatment with 1-2 antiepileptic drugs. Patients exposed to levetiracetam ≤ 90 days before visit 1 were excluded. Patients entered an 8-week prospective baseline period, followed by a 12-week treatment period when they were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo (PBO), BRV 100 mg/day, or BRV 200 mg/day, started without up-titration. The co-primary efficacy outcomes were percent reduction over placebo in 28-day adjusted POS frequency, and ≥ 50% responder rate based on percent reduction in POS frequency from baseline to the treatment period. Seven hundred sixty-eight patients were randomized; 760 were included in the efficacy analysis: 259, 252, and 249 in PBO, BRV 100 mg/day, and BRV 200 mg/day groups, respectively. Percent reduction over PBO in 28-day adjusted seizure frequency (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 22.8% for BRV 100 mg/day (13.3-31.2%; p < 0.001) and 23.2% for BRV 200 mg/day (13.8-31.6%; p < 0.001). The ≥ 50% responder rate (odds ratio vs. PBO; 95% CI) was 21.6% for PBO, 38.9% for BRV 100 mg/day (2.39; 1.6-3.6; p < 0.001), and 37.8% for BRV 200 mg/day (2.19; 1.5-3.3; p < 0.001). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 155 (59.4%) of 261 PBO patients versus 340 (67.6%) of 503 BRV-treated patients (safety population). Discontinuation rates due to TEAEs were 3.8%, 8.3%, and 6.8% for PBO, BRV 100 mg/day, and BRV 200 mg/day, respectively. Most frequent TEAEs (PBO versus BRV) were somnolence (7.7% vs. 18.1%), dizziness (5.0% vs. 12.3%), and fatigue (3.8% vs. 9.5%). Adjunctive BRV 100 and 200 mg/day was efficacious in reducing POS in adults without concomitant levetiracetam use and was well tolerated.

Efficacy and safety of lacosamide as first add-on or later adjunctive treatment for uncontrolled partial-onset seizures: A multicentre open-label trial

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of lacosamide administered as either first add-on or later add-on antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy for patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures (POS). MethodsIn this open-label, multicentre trial, patients with POS initiated oral lacosamide (titrated to 400mg/day) either as add-on to first AED monotherapy, or as later add-on to 1–3 concomitant AEDs after ≥2 previous AEDs. The primary efficacy variable was the proportion of patients achieving seizure freedom for the first 12 weeks of the 24-week Maintenance Phase. Results456 patients received ≥1 dose of lacosamide (96 as first add-on, 360 as later add-on). In the first add-on cohort, 27/72 (37.5%) patients completed 12 weeks treatment and remained seizure-free; 18/68 (26.5%) remained seizure-free after 24 weeks. 64/91 (70.3%) patients achieved ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency during maintenance treatment. This was accompanied by a mean 7.1±16.00 point improvement from Baseline in the Quality of Life Inventory in Epilepsy (QOLIE-31-P) total score for 24-week completers, with improvement reported in all subscales. Most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were dizziness (31.3%) and headache (13.5%). In the later add-on cohort, 39/261 (14.9%) and 29/249 (11.6%) patients remained seizure-free after completing 12 and 24 weeks’ treatment, respectively. 178/353 (50.4%) patients achieved ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency during maintenance treatment. Mean change in QOLIE-31-P total score was 4.8±14.74 points among 24-week completers. Common TEAEs were dizziness (33.6%), somnolence (15.0%) and headache (11.4%). ConclusionsLacosamide initiated as first add-on treatment was efficacious and well tolerated in patients with uncontrolled POS.

Efficacy and safety of ezogabine/retigabine as adjunctive therapy to specified single antiepileptic medications in an open-label study of adults with partial-onset seizures

PurposeTo assess efficacy/tolerability of ezogabine (EZG)/retigabine (RTG) in combination with specified monotherapy antiepileptic drug (AED) treatments in adults with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures using a flexible dosing regimen. MethodsNCT01227902 was an open-label, uncontrolled study of flexibly dosed EZG/RTG. Adults with partial-onset seizures must have been taking either carbamazepine/oxcarbazepine (CBZ/OXC), lamotrigine (LTG), levetiracetam (LEV), or valproic acid (VPA). The study comprised a screening/baseline phase, a 4-week titration phase (initiation on 150mg/day [50mg three times daily (TID)] with weekly increases of 150mg/day [50mg TID] over 4 weeks to 600mg/day), and a flexible dose evaluation (FDE) phase (optional weekly dose changes of 50–150mg/day, to an optimal daily dosage [300–1200mg/day]). The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage of patients experiencing a ≥50% reduction from baseline in partial seizure frequency (responder rate) during the treatment phase (titration and FDE phases). Safety and tolerability were also assessed. ResultsPatients (N=203) were enrolled and received ≥1 dose of EZG/RTG. The dose of EZG/RTG prescribed most frequently during the treatment phase was 600mg/day for all AED groups. Responder rates during the treatment phase were: 40.0% (CBZ/OXC), 32.0% (LTG), 50.0% (LEV), and 56.9% (VPA). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 82% (CBZ/OXC), 76% (LTG), 73% (LEV), and 67% (VPA) of patients; most were of mild-to-moderate intensity. ConclusionsEZG/RTG was effective as adjunctive therapy to CBZ/OXC, LTG, LEV, and VPA, using a flexible dosing regimen, in adults with partial-onset seizures; safety and tolerability were consistent with that previously observed.

Efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam as adjunctive therapy in Japanese patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures.

The aim of this study was to confirm the efficacy and safety of adjunctive levetiracetam in adult Japanese patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, confirmatory trial, eligible patients were randomized to receive levetiracetam 500, 1000, 2000, or 3000 mg/day or placebo for 16 weeks. The primary end-point was percentage reduction from baseline in seizure frequency/week over a 12-week evaluation period. Tolerability assessments were also conducted. Findings of this and a previous randomized, double-blind trial were compared. Of 401 patients screened, 352 were randomized and 316 completed the study. Median percentage reduction in seizure frequency/week from baseline was 12.92%, 18.00%, 11.11% and 31.67% in the levetiracetam 500, 1000, 2000 and 3000-mg groups, respectively, compared with 12.50% in the placebo group. Unlike the previous trial, the primary efficacy analysis between the levetiracetam 1000 and 3000-mg and placebo groups did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.067). Exploratory analyses demonstrated that the difference in seizure reduction versus placebo was 14.93% (95% confidence interval, 1.98-27.64; P = 0.025) for the levetiracetam 3000-mg group. All levetiracetam doses were well tolerated. The main difference between the two trials was a high placebo response in the present trial. The primary efficacy analysis did not reach statistical significance, a finding that could be attributed to an unexpectedly high placebo response. Nonetheless, exploratory analysis suggests that levetiracetam at 3000 mg/day may, at least marginally, be beneficial for patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures.

OP55 – 2335: Effect of adjunctive perampanel on language and coordination in adolescents with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures

Objective To evaluate the short-term effects of adjunctive perampanel on language and coordination in adolescents with refractory partial-onset seizures (POS), supplementing previously reported primary cognition outcomes (Meador et al., AAN 2014). Methods In this Phase II study, 133 adolescents (12–17 years) with uncontrolled POS were randomised 2:1 to receive perampanel (target dose 8–12 mg/day) or placebo (PBO). Patients received blinded treatment over a 6-week titration phase and 13-week maintenance phase. Effects on language were assessed at various study visits using the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT), which consists of two parts (letter fluency and category fluency). The Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT) was used to evaluate the effects on coordination skills. For each assessment, mean change from baseline to end of treatment was calculated from the cognition population and results were compared between treatment groups. Results Of the 133 randomised adolescent patients, 123 adolescents (PBO, n=44; perampanel, n=79) were included in the cognition population. No difference in the mean change in COWAT letter fluency scores from baseline to end of treatment was observed between PBO and perampanel (+0.5 and +0.7, respectively). Although a small difference in the mean change in COWAT category fluency scores from baseline to end of treatment was observed between PBO (+0.3) and perampanel (–0.5), this difference was not considered clinically relevant. Results of the LGPT indicated that patients' motor skills did not worsen with perampanel treatment compared with PBO. Conclusion Assessment of language and coordination using COWAT and LGPT, respectively, in adolescent patients with POS receiving adjunctive perampanel showed that there was no clinically relevant changes in these parameters with perampanel treatment. Acknowledgements: Study sponsor: Eisai Inc. Medical writing: Choice Healthcare Solutions, funded by Eisai Ltd.

Partial Onset Seizure Treatment with Adjunctive Lacosamide in Epileptic Adults: A Review

Epilepsy is a common chronic disorder of the brain and can be seen at all ages with a higher prevalence in developing countries. Adjunctive therapy with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is the gold standard in treatment of epilepsy. Lacosamide (LCM) is a novel AED which is approved for adjunctive therapy for the treatment of partial-onset seizures. Recently 3 Phase II/III placebo controlled clinical trials with similar designs were conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of lacosamide (LCM) administered as adjunctive therapy with other AEDs. Data collected from those studies were pooled, re-analyzed and presented in this review article. Results revealed that LCM is well tolerated and effective in seizure reduction as adjunctive therapy in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures.