Umbilicocerebral Ratio Research Articles

Doppler ultrasound of umbilical and middle cerebral artery in third trimester small-for-gestational age fetuses to decide on timing of delivery for suspected fetal growth restriction: A cohort with nested RCT (DRIGITAT).

To assess the association of the umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR) with adverse perinatal outcome in late preterm small-for-gestational age (SGA) fetuses and to investigate the effect on perinatal outcomes of immediate delivery. Multicentre cohort study with nested randomised controlled trial (RCT). Nineteen secondary and tertiary care centres. Singleton SGA pregnancies (estimated fetal weight [EFW] or fetal abdominal circumference [FAC] <10th centile) from 32 to 36+6 weeks. Women were classified: (1) RCT-eligible: abnormal UCR twice consecutive and EFW below the 3rd centile at/or below35 weeks or below the 10th centile at 36 weeks; (2) abnormal UCR once or intermittent; (3) never abnormal UCR. Consenting RCT-eligible patients were randomised for immediate delivery from 34 weeks or expectant management until 37 weeks. A composite adverse perinatal outcome (CAPO), defined as perinatal death, birth asphyxia or major neonatal morbidity. The cohort consisted of 690 women. The study was halted prematurely for low RCT-inclusion rates (n = 40). In the RCT-eligible group, gestational age at delivery, birthweight and birthweight multiple of the median (MoM) (0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.72) were significantly lower and the CAPO (n = 50, 44%, p < 0.05) was more frequent. Among patients randomised for immediate delivery there was a near-significant lower birthweight (p = 0.05) and higher CAPO (p = 0.07). EFW MoM, pre-eclampsia, gestational hypertension and Doppler classification were independently associated with the CAPO (area under the curve 0.71, 95% CI 0.67-0.76). Perinatal risk was effectively identified by low EFW MoM and UCR. Early delivery of SGA fetuses with an abnormal UCR at 34-36 weeks should only be performed in the context of clinical trials.

Comparison and Analysis of Cerebroplacental Ratio and Umbilicocerebral Ratio in the Prenatal Diagnosis and Severity Assessment of Fetal Growth Restriction: A Retrospective Study and Systematic Review

Purpose: Doppler flow parameters of fetal umbilical artery (UA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA) have been widely used for fetal growth restriction (FGR), but their diagnostic efficacy remains contentious. The purpose of this study is to clarify the superiority of cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) and umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR) in terms of their correlation and predictive accuracy in diagnosing FGR. Methods: Doppler flow parameters of the UA and MCA were tested for FGR patients and normal pregnant women during the third trimester. Collection of delivery gestational weeks and neonatal birth weight were conducted. Logistic regression and area under the curve (AUC) analysis were used to elucidate the association and diagnostic accuracy of CPR and UCR for diagnosing FGR. Results: The CPR-EDV and CPR-MFV in FGR patients were higher, while the CPR-S/D, CPR-PI, and CPR-RI were lower (P&lt;0.05). The UCR-EDV in the FGR group was lower than that in the NC group, while the UCR-S/D and UCR-PI were higher than those in the NC group (P&lt;0.05). Only the CPR-PI (OR:0.166, 95% CI 0.049 ~ 0.563, P = 0.004) was independently associated with FGR. A positive correlation between CPR-PI and delivery gestational weeks was found, as well as neonatal birth weight. The AUC of CPR-PI for detecting FGR was 0.719 (95% CI 0.594 ~ 0.844; P=0.003), with a critical value of 1.57. Conclusion: Compared with UCR and simple UA or MCA blood flow parameters, CPR-PI may be the most optimized ultrasound parameter for diagnosing and assessing FGR.

The role of different Doppler parameters in predicting adverse neonatal outcomes in fetuses with late-onset fetal growth restriction.

The aim of this study is to clarify the role of different Doppler parameters such as umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR), cerebroplacentouterine ratio (CPUR), aortic isthmus, renal artery, and umbilical vein flow Doppler in predicting adverse neonatal outcomes in fetuses with late -onset fetal growth restriction. The study included all patients diagnosed with fetal growth restriction at 32-39 weeks' gestation between 01/02/2020 and 01/02/2022 and treated at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inonu University School of Medicine. Patients included in the study had a median gestational week at delivery of 37 (minimum 33+0-maximum 39+0), median CPR of 1.42 (minimum-maximum 0.43-3.57), and median UCR of 0.7 (minimum-maximum 0.28-2.3). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine the performance of the measured obstetric Doppler parameters in predicting the development of adverse neonatal outcomes. Umbilical venous blood flow showed the best performance in predicting adverse neonatal outcomes [area under the curve 0.952, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.902-0.981, p<0.001]. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that fetuses with abnormal CPUR had a 4.5-fold (95% CI 0.084-0.583, p=0.02) increased risk of adverse neonatal outcome, whereas fetuses with abnormal umbilical venous flow had a 1.07-fold (95% CI 0.903-0.968, p<0.001) increased risk of adverse neonatal outcome. The results of this study demonstrate that the use of UCR, CPUR, umbilical venous flow, and aortic isthmus PI Doppler parameters along with umbilical artery PI and CPR are effective in predicting adverse neonatal outcomes in fetuses with late -onset fetal growth restriction.

Evaluation of the relation between cerebroplacental ratio, umbilical-cerebral ratio, and cerebro-placental-uterine ratio with the occurrence of adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction

Introduction: Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a major obstetric complication associated with an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between Doppler parameters, including the cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR), and cerebro-placental-uterine ratio (CPUR), with adverse perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies complicated by FGR. Patients and Methods: This was a prospective study of 100 women with a singleton pregnancy 28 and 36.8 weeks of gestation was complicated by FGR and mild abnormalities. Feto-maternal Doppler examinations were conducted by the CPR, UCR, and CPUR parameters. Adverse outcomes were defined as Apgar score &lt;7 at 5 minutes, preterm birth &lt;37-week, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, fetal distress, and emergency cesarean section. These outcome parameters were checked with the results of the last ultrasound which performed 1-2 weeks before delivery. Results: Mean umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA-PI) (1.18±0.31 versus 1.04±0.21, P=0.010) and mean uterine arteries (UtAs)-PI (1.18±0.45 versus 0.96±0.36, P=0.20) were significantly higher in pregnancies that experienced adverse perinatal outcomes than those that did not experience them. Mean CPUR (1.82±1.03 versus 2.25±0.83, P=0.039) was significantly lower in pregnancies that experienced adverse perinatal outcomes versus those that did not. In binary multivariate logistic regression analysis, CPR, UCR, and CPUR parameters were evaluated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Only CPUR had a significant relationship with adverse perinatal outcomes. CPUR had a substantial relationship with Apgar score &lt;7 at 5 minutes (OR: 0.13; 95% CI: 0.02-0.63; P=0.012). Conclusion: CPUR is a new Doppler ratio associated with adverse perinatal outcomes in FGR pregnancies with minimal abnormalities.

Study protocol for a randomized trial on timely delivery versus expectant management in late preterm small for gestational age pregnancies with an abnormal umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR): the DRIGITAT study

BackgroundThe clinical inability to correctly identify late fetal growth restriction (FGR) within a group of fetuses who are identified as small for gestational age (SGA) is an everyday problem for all obstetrician-gynecologists. This leads to substantial overtreatment of healthy small fetuses but also inadequate detection of the growth-restricted fetuses that may benefit from timely delivery. Redistribution of the fetal circulation, signaled by an abnormal ratio of the Doppler velocity flow profiles of the umbilical artery and the middle cerebral artery, more specifically an increased umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR) (or its inverse: a decreased cerebroplacental ratio (CPR)), is an adaptation to chronic hypoxemia and nutritional scarcity with long-term consequences in survivors. The relevance of an abnormal UCR has been signaled extensively, and there is a general consensus that it is a signal of FGR, independent of size, with a strong association with poor outcomes. Yet, in the current literature, no comparisons of a monitoring-delivery strategy based on unfavorable UCR have been published. The objective of the Doppler Ratio In fetal Growth restriction Intervention Trial At (near) Term (DRIGITAT) is to evaluate if the timing of the delivery based on an abnormal UCR in late preterm fetuses identified as SGA improves neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age.MethodsThe DRIGITAT study is a national multicenter cohort study of women with singleton pregnancies between 32 and 37 weeks of gestation identified as SGA, with a nested randomized controlled trial (RCT) in case of an abnormal UCR (> 0.8). Recruiting centers are in The Netherlands. In the nested RCT, women are randomized to either immediate induction of labor or expectant management from 34 weeks in case of severely abnormal size (EFW or FAC < p3) and from 36 weeks in case of mildly abnormal size (EFW or FAC p3–p10). The primary outcome measure is the 7-point average difference in the composite cognitive score (CCS) and composite motor score (CMS) on the Bayley-3 at 2 years. Secondary outcome measures include a composite outcome of neonatal morbidity, perinatal mortality, mode of delivery, maternal quality of life, costs, and predictive value of serum biomarkers. Analyses will be by intention to treat. The required sample size is determined for the nested RCT as 185 patients.DiscussionThis study will provide insight into the diagnostic efficacy of UCR measurement in the evaluation of SGA fetuses in order to differentiate the healthy SGA fetus from the growth-restricted fetus and to determine if a fetus with abnormal UCR benefits from early delivery.Trial registrationHealthcare Evaluation Netherlands NTR6663. Registered on 14 August 2017.

Predictive role of Doppler indices of cerebral–placental–uterine ratio and umbilico-cerebral ratio for late-onset fetal growth restriction: a prospective cohort study

Predicting late-onset foetal growth restriction (FGR) has proven to be rather challenging. In this study, we propose a new parameter, cerebral–placental–uterine (CPU) ratio and umbilico-cerebral (UC) ratio for this matter. Results of this study which included a total of 227 nulliparous women showed that an increase in CPU ratio (OR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.23–0.88; p=.020) was associated with lower odds of foetal weight above the 10th percentile at birth. CPU ratio measured at 35–37 weeks of gestation had an AUC of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.58, 0.98), sensitivity of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.24, 0.91) and specificity of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.79, 0.96) for prediction of late-onset FGR, which showed higher accuracy than UC ratio. As some cases of the late-onset FGR are not diagnosed by foetal biometry, it is important to find Doppler parameters that can help us predict these cases and CPU ratio may help physicians in detection of high-risk foetuses that will benefit from earlier intervention. Impact Statement What is already known on this subject? Late-onset foetal growth restriction (FGR) defined by an FGR diagnosis after 32 weeks of gestational age, can lead to short- and long-term morbidities and early diagnosis is the key to prevent these complications. What do the results of this study add? Results showed that each unit increase in numeric variables including CP ratio (OR = 0.29, p=.006), and CPU ratio (OR = 0.40, p=.006) was associated with lower odds of the foetal weight above the 10th percentile in the second ultrasound at 35–37 weeks. In other words, CPU ratio can prove to be useful marker in prediction of late-onset FGR. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Our prospective cohort study confirms the added value of low CPU ratio, with higher predictive accuracy than UC ratio, in predicting late-onset FGR. Detection of late FGR remains poor, but it is important to prevent stillbirth so further studies on the role of CPU ratio in predicting FGR and perinatal outcomes are needed.

The accuracy of Fetoplacental Doppler in distinguishing between growth restricted and constitutionally small fetuses.

Fetoplacental Doppler is considered to be a key tool for the diagnosis of placenta-mediated fetal growth restriction(FGR). We aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of fetoplacental Doppler for specific placental diseases. A retrospective cohort study of all women with a singleton pregnancy and an antenatal diagnosis of SGA fetus(estimated fetal weight <10th centile for gestational age), who underwent fetoplacental Doppler assessment within 2 weeks before birth. Primary exposure was any abnormal Doppler result, defined as an abnormal umbilical artery(UA) Doppler, middle cerebral artery(MCA) Doppler, cerebroplacental-ratio(CPR), or umbilico-cerebral ratio(UCR). Study outcomes were abnormal placental pathology: maternal vascular malperfusion(MVM), villitis of unknown etiology(VUE), or fetal vascular malperfusion(FVM). A total of 558 women with a singleton SGA fetus were included, of whom 239(42.8%) had an abnormal fetoplacental Doppler findings. UA Doppler had the lowest detection rate for abnormal placental pathology. MCA Doppler exhibited a significantly higher detection rate for all types of pathology. CPR and UCR exhibited highest detection rates for all types of placental pathology, however, were also associated with the highest false positive rate. The combination of fetoplacental Doppler with the severity of SGA and maternal hypertensive status achieved a high negative predictive value MVM lesions(97%). In contrast, fetoplacental Doppler did not improve the negative predictive value for non-MVM pathology(VUE or FVM). Among SGA fetuses, the combination of UA and MCA Doppler is highly accurate in ruling out FGR due to MVM placental pathology, but is of limited value in excluding FGR due to underlying non-MVM pathologies.

Fetal cerebral blood-flow redistribution: analysis of Doppler reference charts and association of different thresholds with adverse perinatal outcome.

ABSTRACTObjectivesFirst, to compare published Doppler reference charts of the ratios of flow in the fetal middle cerebral and umbilical arteries (i.e. the cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) and umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR)). Second, to assess the association of thresholds of CPR and UCR based on these charts with short‐term composite adverse perinatal outcome in a cohort of pregnancies considered to be at risk of late preterm fetal growth restriction.MethodsStudies presenting reference charts for CPR or UCR were searched for in PubMed. Formulae for plotting the median and the 10th percentile (for CPR) or the 90th percentile (for UCR) against gestational age were extracted from the publication or calculated from the published tables. Data from a prospective European multicenter observational cohort study of singleton pregnancies at risk of fetal growth restriction at 32 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation, in which fetal arterial Doppler measurements were collected longitudinally, were used to compare the different charts. Specifically, the association of UCR and CPR thresholds (CPR < 10th percentile or UCR ≥ 90th percentile and multiples of the median (MoM) values) with composite adverse perinatal outcome was analyzed. The association was also compared between chart‐based thresholds and absolute thresholds. Composite adverse perinatal outcome comprised both abnormal condition at birth and major neonatal morbidity.ResultsTen studies presenting reference charts for CPR or UCR were retrieved. There were large differences between the charts in the 10th and 90th percentile values of CPR and UCR, respectively, while median values were more similar. In the gestational‐age range of 28–36 weeks, there was no relationship between UCR or CPR and gestational age. From the prospective observational study, 856 pregnancies at risk of late‐onset preterm fetal growth restriction were included in the analysis. The association of abnormal UCR or CPR with composite adverse perinatal outcome was similar for percentile thresholds or MoM values, as calculated from the charts, and for absolute thresholds, both on univariable analysis and after adjustment for gestational age at measurement, estimated fetal weight MoM and pre‐eclampsia. The adjusted odds ratio for composite adverse perinatal outcome was 3.3 (95% CI, 1.7–6.4) for an absolute UCR threshold of ≥ 0.9 or an absolute CPR threshold of < 1.11 (corresponding to ≥ 1.75 MoM), and 1.6 (95% CI, 0.9–2.9) for an absolute UCR threshold of ≥ 0.7 to < 0.9 or an absolute CPR threshold of ≥ 1.11 to < 1.43 (corresponding to ≥ 1.25 to < 1.75 MoM).ConclusionsIn the gestational‐age range of 32 to 36 weeks, adjustment of CPR or UCR for gestational age is not necessary when assessing the risk of adverse outcome in pregnancies at risk of fetal growth restriction. The adoption of absolute CPR or UCR thresholds, independent of reference charts, is feasible and makes clinical assessment simpler than if using percentiles or other gestational‐age normalized units. The high variability in percentile threshold values among the commonly used UCR and CPR reference charts hinders reliable diagnosis and clinical management of late preterm fetal growth restriction. © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Brain Doppler abnormalities in fetuses with open spina bifida

Background To describe the brain Doppler changes in fetuses with isolated open spina bifida (OSB). Study design Doppler ultrasound measurements including the umbilical artery (UA) pulsatility index (PI), middle cerebral artery (MCA) PI, and their combination into the cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) and umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR) were performed in a cohort of fetuses with OSB. Included patients were individually matched to a control group without structural anomalies and similar gestational ages. MCA-PI and/or CPR values below the 5th centile were considered abnormal and indicative of cerebral blood redistribution, while UCR and UA-PI above the 95th centile were considered abnormal. Results During the study period, 266 fetuses were recruited, 133 normally grown fetuses with OSB and 133 matched controls. Doppler recordings were successfully obtained in all fetuses at a median gestational age of 30.9 weeks. All cases showed UA-PI within normal ranges, but fetuses with OSB showed significantly higher frequency of cerebral blood redistribution (15.0 vs. 3.0%, p < .01), MCA-PI <5th centile (10.5% vs. 3.0%, p = .01), decreased CPR (9.8% vs. 2.3%, p = .01) and increased UCR (17.2 % vs 7.5 %, p =.02). The rate of cerebral blood redistribution was significantly higher in the OSB group with ventriculomegaly in comparison to those with OSB and normal lateral ventricle diameter (18.6% vs. 3.2%, respectively; p <.05). Conclusion A proportion of fetuses with isolated open spina bifida showed cerebral blood redistribution.

Second trimester cerebroplacental ratio versus umbilicocerebral ratio for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcomes

Introduction An abnormal third trimester cerebroplacental ratio has been previously associated with adverse perinatal outcome. The less studied inverse of the cerebroplacental ratio, the umbilicocerebral ratio, has been proposed as a better predictor of adverse perinatal outcome. However, little is known about the implication of either an abnormal cerebroplacental ratio or umbilicocerebral ratio in the second trimester. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between an abnormal second trimester cerebroplacental ratio and adverse perinatal outcome and provide comparison to an abnormal second trimester umbilicocerebral ratio. Materials and methods This retrospective cohort study in a single tertiary referral center utilized data from all non-anomalous singleton pregnancies that underwent Doppler assessment of the cerebroplacental ratio between 20 and 28 weeks gestation. The study period was 1 January 2015 to 31 July 2018. Abnormal cerebroplacental ratio was defined as less than the 5th percentile for gestational age. If patients had more than one ultrasound during the study period (i.e. for serial assessment of fetal growth), the lowest value of the cerebroplacental ratio was recorded. The primary outcome was a composite of clinically relevant adverse perinatal outcomes including preterm delivery, small for gestational age, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. Secondary outcomes included urgent delivery for fetal distress (operative vaginal delivery or cesarean section) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. An abnormal umbilicocerebral ratio was defined as greater than 95th percentile for gestational age. Areas under the curve were calculated and compared for cerebroplacental ratio and umbilicocerebral ratio. Results 2326 pregnancies met inclusion criteria. Of these, 91 (3.9%) had an abnormal second trimester cerebroplacental ratio. Fetuses with an abnormal second trimester cerebroplacental ratio had a 2.3-fold (95% CI 1.5–3.6, p < .05) increased risk of adverse perinatal outcome after adjusting for potential confounders such as chronic hypertension, pregestational diabetes, and smoking during pregnancy. Significantly increased risks of preterm delivery (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1–38, p < .05) and neonatal intensive care unit admission (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2–3.6, p < .05) were also seen in a subgroup analysis of abnormal cerebroplacental ratio in appropriate for gestational age infants. 132 (5.7%) fetuses had an abnormal second trimester umbilicocerebral ratio, and these fetuses had a 2.0-fold (95% CI 1.4–3.0, p < .05) increased risk of adverse perinatal outcome. The area under the curve for CPR and UCR for prediction of the primary outcome was 0.6 for both (95% CI 0.57–0.61 and 0.57–0.62, respectively, both p < .05). Conclusion An abnormal second trimester cerebroplacental ratio or umbilicocerebral ratio is associated with adverse perinatal outcome. However, the predictive ability of either ratio remains suboptimal.

Comparison between Cerebroplacental Ratio and Umbilicocerebral Ratio in Predicting Adverse Perinatal Outcome in Pregnancies Complicated by Late Fetal Growth Restriction: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study

Introduction: The role of cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) or umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR) to predict adverse intrapartum and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by late fetal growth restriction (FGR) remains controversial. Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study involving 5 referral centers in Italy and Spain, including singleton pregnancies complicated by late FGR, as defined by Delphi consensus criteria, with a scan 1 week prior to delivery. The primary objective was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the CPR and UCR for the prediction of a composite adverse outcome, defined as the presence of either an adverse intrapartum outcome (need for operative delivery/cesarean section for suspected fetal distress) or an adverse perinatal outcome (intrauterine death, Apgar score <7 at 5 min, arterial pH <7.1, base excess of >−11 mEq/mL, or neonatal intensive care unit admission). Results: Median CPR absolute values (1.11 vs. 1.22, p = 0.018) and centiles (3 vs. 4, p = 0.028) were lower in pregnancies with a composite adverse outcome than in those without it. Median UCR absolute values (0.89 vs. 0.82, p = 0.018) and centiles (97 vs. 96, p = 0.028) were higher. However, the area under the curve, 95% confidence interval for predicting the composite adverse outcome showed a poor predictive value: 0.580 (0.512–0.646) for the raw absolute values of CPR and UCR, and 0.575 (0.507–0.642) for CPR and UCR centiles adjusted for gestational age. The use of dichotomized values (CPR <1, UCR >1 or CPR <5th centile, UCR >95th centile) did not improve the diagnostic accuracy. Conclusion: The CPR and UCR measured in the week prior delivery are of low predictive value to assess adverse intrapartum and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies with late FGR.

Diagnostic performance of cerebroplacental and umbilicocerebral ratio in appropriate for gestational age and late growth restricted fetuses attempting vaginal delivery: a multicenter, retrospective study

Background Cerebroplacental Doppler studies have been advocated to predict the risk of adverse perinatal outcome (APO) irrespective of fetal weight. Objective To report the diagnostic performance of cerebroplacental (CPR) and umbilicocerebral (UCR) ratios in predicting APO in appropriate for gestational age (AGA) fetuses and in those affected by late fetal growth restriction (FGR) attempting vaginal delivery. Study design Multicenter, retrospective, nested case-control study between 1 January 2017 and January 2020 involving five referral centers in Italy and Spain. Singleton gestations with a scan between 36 and 40 weeks and within two weeks of attempting vaginal delivery were included. Fetal arterial Doppler and biometry were collected. The AGA group was defined as fetuses with an estimated fetal weight and abdominal circumference >10th and <90th percentile, while the late FGR group was defined by Delphi consensus criteria. The primary outcome was the prediction of a composite of perinatal adverse outcomes including either intrauterine death, Apgar score at 5 min <7, abnormal acid-base status (umbilical artery pH < 7.1 or base excess of more than −11) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Area under the curve (AUC) analysis was performed. Results 646 pregnancies (317 in the AGA group and 329 in the late FGR group) were included. APO were present in 12.6% AGA and 24.3% late FGR pregnancies, with an odds ratio of 2.22 (95% CI 1.46–3.37). The performance of CPR and UCR for predicting APO was poor in both AGA [AUC: 0.44 (0.39–0.51)] and late FGR fetuses [AUC: 0.56 (0.49–0.61)]. Conclusions CPR and UCR on their own are poor prognostic predictors of APO irrespective of fetal weight.

Comparing the cerebro-placental to umbilico-cerebral Doppler ratios for the prediction of adverse neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction

Objective The cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) has shown utility as a surrogate marker for fetal growth restriction and can be used to stratify the risk for adverse perinatal outcomes in affected pregnancies. However, recent studies suggest that its inverse, the umbilico-cerebral ratio (UCR), may be a better predictor of such outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the prognostic accuracy of CPR to that of UCR Doppler in predicting short-term adverse perinatal outcomes in growth-restricted fetuses. Methods We conducted a secondary analysis using data from a prospective study on women referred for fetal growth ultrasounds between 26 and 36 weeks of gestation and with an EFW < 10th percentile by Hadlock standard. The CPR and UCR were converted into Z-scores adjusted for gestational age at ultrasound. Abnormal CPR was defined as Z-score below the 10th percentile for the gestational age and abnormal UCR as Z-score above the 90th percentile. We calculated sensitivity and specificity of the two Doppler parameters for predicting composite adverse perinatal outcome (APO) defined as the presence of any one of the following: umbilical cord arterial pH <7.10, Apgars at 5 min <7, NICU admission,grade III/IV intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), neonatal seizure and death. Logistic regression analysis was performed, ROC curves plotted and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) were compared between CPR and UCR. Results Over the study period, there were 197 women meeting inclusion criteria, of which 27 (13.7%) had a composite adverse neonatal outcome. The sensitivity using CPR Z-score for predicting the composite APO was higher thanwas similar to using UCR Z-score (39.3% compared with 37%) for a similar specificity (94.7 versus 94.1), respectively. However, the positive predictive value (PPV) was higher for CPR (55% vs UCR 50%) and the negative predictive values (NPV) were similar. For a fixed false positive rate of 10%, the detection rates for adverse neonatal outcomes were 40% using either CPR or UCR. The AUC for CPR and UCR were 0.70 and 0.68, respectively. Conclusion This study did not find any advantage in utilizing the UCR over the CPR.

Modeling gestational age centiles for fetal umbilicocerebral ratio by quantile regression analysis: a secondary analysis of a prospective cross-sectional study

Objective There is a lack of evidence on whether to favor cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) or umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR) when assessing pregnancies at risk of fetal growth restriction. The Recent evidences highlight a significant heterogeneity in the methodology of previously published studies reporting reference ranges for Doppler indices, which may affect the clinical applicability of these charts. The aim of this study was to develop charts of UCR based upon a recently proposed standardized methodology and using quantile regression. Methods This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cross-sectional study including low-risk singleton pregnancies between 24 and 40 weeks of gestation undergoing Doppler recordings. The UCR centile values were established by quantile regression at different gestational age intervals. Quantile regression analysis was used to build the UCR chart. Result 2516 low- risk singleton pregnancies were included in the analysis. UCR decreased with advancing gestational age. The 3rd, 5th 10th, 50th, 90th, 95th, and 97th centiles according to gestational age are provided, as well as equations to allow calculation of any other percentile. Conclusions We have established gestational age-specific normative centiles reference limits for UCR.

OC07.02: Comparison between cerebroplacental ratio and umbilicocerebral ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome at term

OC07.02: Comparison between cerebroplacental ratio and umbilicocerebral ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome at term

Sex-specific reference ranges of cerebroplacental and umbilicocerebral ratios: longitudinal study.

Observational studies have shown that low cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) values predict an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcome. The inverse ratio, i.e. the umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR), has been suggested to be a better predictor as it rises with increasing degree of fetal compromise. However, longitudinal reference ranges for UCR have not been established, and whether gestational-age-dependent changes in CPR or UCR differ between male and female fetuses has not been studied. Thus, the aims of this study were to investigate sex-specific, gestational-age-associated serial changes in CPR and UCR during the second half of pregnancy and to establish longitudinal reference ranges. This was a secondary analysis of prospectively collected data from a dual-center longitudinal observational cohort study of low-risk singleton pregnancies. Doppler blood-flow velocity waveforms were obtained serially from the umbilical artery (UA) and fetal middle cerebral artery (MCA) from 19-41 weeks' gestation, and pulsatility indices (PIs) were determined. CPR and UCR were calculated as the ratios MCA-PI/UA-PI and UA-PI/MCA-PI, respectively. The course and outcome of pregnancies were recorded, and the sex of the fetus was determined after delivery. Reference intervals for CPR and UCR were constructed using multilevel modeling, and gestational-age-specific Z-scores in male and female fetuses were compared. Of a total of 299 pregnancies enrolled, 284 (148 male and 136 female fetuses) were included in the final analysis, and 979 paired measurements of UA-PI and MCA-PI were used to construct sex-specific longitudinal reference intervals. The relationship of both CPR and UCR with gestational age was U-shaped, but in opposite directions. There was a small but significant difference in Z-scores of CPR and UCR between male and female fetuses throughout the second half of pregnancy (P = 0.007). We have established longitudinal reference ranges for CPR and UCR suitable for serial monitoring, with the possibility of refining assessment by using fetal sex-specific ranges and conditioning by a previous measurement. The clinical significance of such refinements needs further evaluation. © 2019 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Fetal cerebral Doppler changes and outcome in late preterm fetal growth restriction: prospective cohort study

To explore the association between fetal umbilical and middle cerebral artery (MCA) Doppler abnormalities and outcome in late preterm pregnancies at risk of fetal growth restriction. This was a prospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies at risk of fetal growth restriction at 32 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks of gestation, enrolled in 33 European centers between 2017 and 2018, in which umbilical and fetal MCA Doppler velocimetry was performed. Pregnancies were considered at risk of fetal growth restriction if they had estimated fetal weight and/or abdominal circumference (AC) < 10th percentile, abnormal arterial Doppler and/or a fall in AC growth velocity of more than 40 percentile points from the 20-week scan. Composite adverse outcome comprised both immediate adverse birth outcome and major neonatal morbidity. Using a range of cut-off values, the association of MCA pulsatility index and umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR) with composite adverse outcome was explored. The study population comprised 856 women. There were two (0.2%) intrauterine deaths. Median gestational age at delivery was 38 (interquartile range (IQR), 37-39) weeks and birth weight was 2478 (IQR, 2140-2790) g. Compared with infants with normal outcome, those with composite adverse outcome (n = 93; 11%) were delivered at an earlier gestational age (36 vs 38 weeks) and had a lower birth weight (1900 vs 2540 g). The first Doppler observation of MCA pulsatility index < 5th percentile and UCR Z-score above gestational-age-specific thresholds (1.5 at 32-33 weeks and 1.0 at 34-36 weeks) had the highest relative risks (RR) for composite adverse outcome (RR 2.2 (95% CI, 1.5-3.2) and RR 2.0 (95% CI, 1.4-3.0), respectively). After adjustment for confounders, the association between UCR Z-score and composite adverse outcome remained significant, although gestational age at delivery and birth-weight Z-score had a stronger association. In this prospective multicenter study, signs of cerebral blood flow redistribution were found to be associated with adverse outcome in late preterm singleton pregnancies at risk of fetal growth restriction. Whether cerebral redistribution is a marker describing the severity of fetal growth restriction or an independent risk factor for adverse outcome remains unclear, and whether it is useful for clinical management can be answered only in a randomized trial. © 2020 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Umbilicocerebral ratio: potential implications of inversing the cerebroplacental ratio.

Umbilicocerebral ratio: potential implications of inversing the cerebroplacental ratio.

Volume blood flow-based indices of fetal brain sparing in the second half of pregnancy: A longitudinal study.

Cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) and umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR) are clinically used as a measure of fetal brain sparing. These are calculated as the ratios between the pulsatility indices (PIs) of middle cerebral (MCA) and umbilical (UA) arteries, and are an indirect representation of the balance between cerebral and placental perfusion. Volume blood flow (Q)-based ratios, ie Q-CPR or Q-UCR, would directly reflect the distribution of fetal cardiac output to the placenta and brain. Thus, we aimed to determine the development pattern of Q-CPR and Q-UCR during the second half of pregnancy, construct reference intervals, and evaluate their association with CPR and UCR. In a longitudinal cohort study of low-risk pregnancies, the inner diameter of the fetal superior vena cava (SVC) and umbilical vein (UV) was measured and velocity waveforms were obtained from the MCA, UA, UV and SVC using ultrasound at approximately 4-weekly intervals from 20 to 41weeks. The CPR was calculated as PIMCA /PIUA and the inverse ratio was the UCR. Cerebral and placental blood flows were estimated as the product of mean velocity and cross-sectional area of the SVC and UV, respectively. Q-CPR was calculated as QSVC /QUV and the inverse as the Q-UCR. Gestational age-specific reference intervals were calculated and associations between variables were tested using multilevel regression modeling. Longitudinal reference intervals of Q-CPR and Q-UCR were established based on 471 paired measurements of QSVC and QUV obtained serially from 134 singleton pregnancies. The mean Q-CPR increased from 0.4 to 0.8 during the second half of pregnancy and Q-UCR declined from 2.5 to 1.3, while the CPR and UCR had U-shaped curves but in opposite directions. No significant correlation was found between CPR and Q-CPR (R=0.10; P=.051), or UCR and Q-UCR (R=0.09; P=.11), and the agreement between PI-based and Q-based indices of fetal brain sparing was poor. Indices of fetal brain sparing based on placental and cerebral volume blood flow differ from those calculated from UA and MCA PIs. They correlated poorly with conventional CPR and UCR, indicating that they may provide additional/different physiological information. Reference values of Q-CPR and Q-UCR established here can be useful to investigate their clinical value further.

Computerized fetal heart rate analysis in early preterm fetal growth restriction.

To assess the value of computerized cardiotocography (cCTG) with calculation of fetal heart rate (FHR) short-term variability (STV) in early preterm fetal growth restriction (FGR) for prevention of fetal death and neonatal asphyxia, neonatal morbidity, and 2-year neurodevelopmental impairment. This was a retrospective cohort study of all women who were admitted to the Amsterdam University Medical Center-AMC between 2003 and 2015 due to FGR and/or pre-eclampsia, and who were delivered by prelabor Cesarean section, or had a fetal death, before 32 weeks' gestation. STV of all available cCTG registrations during the 5 days preceding fetal death or delivery was calculated retrospectively, and FHR decelerations were classified visually as absent, 1-2/h or recurrent (> 2/h). Adverse outcome endpoints were defined as fetal death, neonatal asphyxia at birth (including fetal death), neonatal death, major neonatal morbidity and 2-year neurodevelopmental outcome. A simulation analysis was performed to assess the incidence of adverse outcome using two thresholds for cCTG: (1) highly abnormal (STV < 2.6 ms before 29 weeks and < 3.0 ms thereafter, and/or recurrent FHR decelerations); and (2) moderately abnormal (STV < 3.5 ms before 29 weeks and < 4.0 ms thereafter, and/or recurrent FHR decelerations). Three management strategies were assessed using a strict schedule for the frequency of cCTG recordings: (1) cCTG without use of fetal arterial Doppler; (2) cCTG with additional fetal arterial Doppler after 29 weeks; and (3) cCTG with additional fetal arterial Doppler after 27 weeks. Included were 367 pregnancies (3295 cCTG recordings), of which 20 resulted in fetal death and 347 were delivered by Cesarean section before the onset of labor. Cesarean delivery was indicated by fetal condition in 94% of cases and by maternal condition in 6%. Median gestational age at delivery was 30 (interquartile range (IQR), 28-31) weeks and median birth weight was 900 (IQR, 740-1090) g. Six cases of fetal death were not anticipated by standard practice using visual assessment of CTG. A last highly abnormal cCTG was associated with fetal death and with neonatal asphyxia (including fetal death; n = 99), but not with major neonatal morbidity and 2-year neurodevelopmental outcome. Moderately abnormal cCTG had no significant association with any endpoint. Simulation analysis showed that a strategy that combined cCTG results with umbilicocerebral ratio or umbilical absent or reversed end-diastolic flow could detect all fetal deaths. Computerized CTG in combination with fetal arterial Doppler, with a strict protocol for the frequency of recordings, is likely to be more effective than visual CTG assessment for preventing fetal death in early preterm FGR. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.