Abstract
Observational studies have shown that low cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) values predict an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcome. The inverse ratio, i.e. the umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR), has been suggested to be a better predictor as it rises with increasing degree of fetal compromise. However, longitudinal reference ranges for UCR have not been established, and whether gestational-age-dependent changes in CPR or UCR differ between male and female fetuses has not been studied. Thus, the aims of this study were to investigate sex-specific, gestational-age-associated serial changes in CPR and UCR during the second half of pregnancy and to establish longitudinal reference ranges. This was a secondary analysis of prospectively collected data from a dual-center longitudinal observational cohort study of low-risk singleton pregnancies. Doppler blood-flow velocity waveforms were obtained serially from the umbilical artery (UA) and fetal middle cerebral artery (MCA) from 19-41 weeks' gestation, and pulsatility indices (PIs) were determined. CPR and UCR were calculated as the ratios MCA-PI/UA-PI and UA-PI/MCA-PI, respectively. The course and outcome of pregnancies were recorded, and the sex of the fetus was determined after delivery. Reference intervals for CPR and UCR were constructed using multilevel modeling, and gestational-age-specific Z-scores in male and female fetuses were compared. Of a total of 299 pregnancies enrolled, 284 (148 male and 136 female fetuses) were included in the final analysis, and 979 paired measurements of UA-PI and MCA-PI were used to construct sex-specific longitudinal reference intervals. The relationship of both CPR and UCR with gestational age was U-shaped, but in opposite directions. There was a small but significant difference in Z-scores of CPR and UCR between male and female fetuses throughout the second half of pregnancy (P = 0.007). We have established longitudinal reference ranges for CPR and UCR suitable for serial monitoring, with the possibility of refining assessment by using fetal sex-specific ranges and conditioning by a previous measurement. The clinical significance of such refinements needs further evaluation. © 2019 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Highlights
Fetal cerebral perfusion is stable over a range of blood pressures owing to autoregulation[1,2]
Hypoxemia assessed by cordocentesis in fetal growth restriction (FGR) is associated with high blood flow velocity and low pulsatility index (PI) in the middle cerebral artery (MCA)[6]
This study has established longitudinal reference ranges for cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) and umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR) and has shown that these indices
Summary
Fetal cerebral perfusion is stable over a range of blood pressures owing to autoregulation[1,2]. Hypoxemia assessed by cordocentesis in fetal growth restriction (FGR) is associated with high blood flow velocity and low pulsatility index (PI) in the middle cerebral artery (MCA)[6]. Placental blood flow is low in FGR owing to increased vascular impedance[7,8]. As the flow and impedance in the cerebral and placental circulations tend to change in opposite directions during fetal hypoxemia, a ratio between the cerebral and placental blood flow or impedance could be a useful parameter for assessing fetal wellbeing. The cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), i.e. MCA-PI/umbilical artery (UA)-PI, has been suggested as a non-invasive measure of this ‘brain-sparing’ response, which might be able to predict perinatal outcome better than the individual parameters of MCA-PI and UA-PI separately[11]. Several studies have reported its utility in predicting pregnancy outcome[13,14,15,16,17], its benefit in identifying fetuses at risk and preventing perinatal death has yet to be confirmed in properly designed clinical trials[18,19,20,21]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.