Ultrasound-guided Adductor Canal Block Research Articles

Poster 245: Periarticular Local Infiltrative Anesthesia after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison to Regional Adductor Canal Block with Matched Sub-Analysis

Objectives:There is a paucity of literature that directly compares postoperative pain control and hospital recovery after using periarticular local infiltrative anesthesia (LIA) or regional anesthesia with an adductor canal block (ACB) for ambulatory anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgery. Additional studies are needed to investigate the analgesic efficacy of both ACB and LIA in patients undergoing ACLR surgery with concomitant procedures. The purpose of this study is to compare postoperative pain and recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in patients who received an adductor canal block (ACB) or periarticular local infiltrative anesthesia (LIA).Methods:Study Design: Retrospective comparison studyA retrospective review of a prospectively collected ACL registry was performed. Patients underwent ACLR at a single institution between January 2015 and September 2020 and received long-acting local anesthesia with a pre-operative ultrasound-guided ACB or peri-articular LIA after surgery. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, milligram morphine equivalents (MME) consumed in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), and total hospital recovery time were compared. Univariate analysis was used to compare VAS pain and MME totals between overall groups and groups matched for age, sex, BMI, graft type, and meniscal treatment. A p-value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.Results:There were 265 knees (253 patients) included (LIA, 157 knees; ACB, 108 knees). Overall, VAS pain scores before hospital discharge (LIA 2.6 ± 1.5 vs. ACB 2.4 ± 1.4, p=0.334) and total MMEs were similar (LIA 17.6 ± 7.6 vs. ACB 18.5 ± 6.7 (MME), p=0.134). Total time to discharge also did not significantly differ (LIA 137.5 (IQR:116-178) vs. ACB 147 (IQR:123-183) (min), p=0.118). Matched sub-analysis (LIA and ACB, n=94) did not reveal significant differences in VAS pain before discharge (LIA 2.4 ± 1.4 vs ACB: 2.7 ± 1.5, p=0.122) or total MMEs (LIA 18.6 ± 6.7 vs. ACB 17.9 ± 7.1, p=0.532).Conclusions:The use of ACB or LIA resulted in similar pain levels and opioid consumption during early recovery after ACLR surgery.

Ultrasound-Guided Adductor Canal Block Versus Intraoperative Transarticular Saphenous Nerve Block: A Retrospective Analysis.

The ultrasound-guided adductor canal block (High-ACB) is an effective option for pain control in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but its use can add substantial cost and preparatory time to a TKA procedure. An intraoperative adductor canal block (Low-ACB) performed by the operative surgeon has been described as an alternative. The hypothesis of this study is that the Low-ACB would achieve noninferior pain control and opioid utilization postoperatively when compared to the High-ACB. This is a retrospective study of a prospectively maintained database comparing the High-ACB vs the Low-ACB. The primary outcome measure was morphine milligram equivalents consumed. Secondary outcome measures included Visual Analog Scale pain scores, postoperative outcomes (Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, knee range of motion), length of stay, postoperative speed of mobilization, and complications related to the type of block. There were 139 patients in the study. There was lower opioid use in the first 24hours in the Low-ACB compared to the High-ACB group respectively (26.3 vs 30, P= .29) but this did not reach statistical significance. There was a statistically significant difference in Visual Analog Scale score on postoperative day 1 in the Low-ACB vs High-ACB groups respectively (4.6 vs 3.7, P= .02) but this did not reach the level of clinical significance. There was no statistical difference in the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, or postoperative range of motion. There were no block-related complications in either group. The Low-ACB is a safe, effective, and cost-saving alternative to the traditional High-ACB for pain control in TKA.

Adductor canal block combined with local infiltration analgesia with morphine and betamethasone show superior analgesic effect than local infiltration analgesia alone for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial

BackgroundLocal infiltration analgesia (LIA) and adductor canal block (ACB) provide postoperative analgesia for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). ACB blocks the saphenous nerve and has smaller impacts on quadriceps muscle weakness. ACB theoretically does not have enough analgesic effects on posterior sensory nerves. LIA may increase its analgesic effects on the posterolateral knee. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether ACB combined with a LIA cocktail of ropivacaine, morphine, and betamethasone has superior analgesic effect than LIA for TKA.MethodsA total of 86 patients were assessed for eligibility from February 2019 to May 2019. 26 of those were excluded, and 60 patients were divided into 2 groups by computer-generated random number. Group A (LIA group) received LIA cocktail of ropivacaine, morphine and betamethasone. Group B (LIA+ ACB group) received ultrasound-guided ACB and LIA cocktail of ropivacaine, morphine and betamethasone. Postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) resting or active pain scores, opioid consumption, range of motion (ROM), functional tests, complications and satisfaction rates were measured. The longest follow-up was 2 years.ResultsTwo groups have no differences in terms of characteristics, preoperative pain or function (P > 0.05). ACB combined with LIA had significantly lower resting and active VAS pain scores, better ROM, better sleeping quality and higher satisfaction rates than LIA alone within 72 h postoperatively (P < 0.05). Complications, or adverse events and HSS score, SF-12 score were observed no significant differences within 2 years postoperatively.ConclusionsAdductor canal block combined with Local infiltration analgesia provide better early pain control. Although the small statistical benefit may not result in minimal clinically important difference, Adductor canal block combined with Local infiltration analgesia also reduce opioid requirements, improve sleeping quality, and do not increase the complication rate. Therefore, Adductor canal block combined with Local infiltration analgesia still have good application prospects as an effective pain management for total knee arthroplasty.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900021385, 18/02/2019.

Surgeon administered direct adductor canal block is as good as ultrasound guided adductor canal block in pain management in knee replacements- A retrospective case-control study

AimThe aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of the DACB in a clinical setting and compare the efficacy of postoperative pain relief after TKR in the patients administered DACB versus USG guided ACB. Also to see efficacy and safety of USACB in patients operated with medial parapatellar and subvastus approach. Material and methods250 consecutive patients operated with TKR between Jan 2019 to March 2022 were included. Group A included patients operated with medial parapatellar approach and received USACB, Group B included patients operated with medial parapatellar approach and received DACB while Group C included patients operated with subvastus approach and received USACB. VAS scores between three groups were compared at 12 and 24 h. All three groups of patients were otherwise treated identically in the hospital. ResultsThe mean age and BMI was not statistically significant between the three groups. The mean VAS pain score at rest at 12 h was 3.06 ± 1.49 (Group A) vs 1.58 ± 1.19 (Group B) [p < 0.0001] and 3.06 ± 1.49 (Group A) vs 1.88 ± 1.18 (Group C) [p < 0.0001]; and at 24 h was 1.88 ± 1.31 (Group A) vs 2.39 ± 1.27 (Group B) [p = 0.023] and 1.88 ± 1.31 (Group A) vs 2.19 ± 1.29 (Group C) [p = 0.16]. The mean theatre time was 151.9 ± 11.37 min (Group A) vs 141.02 ± 19.46 min (Group B) (p = 0.0003) and 151.9 ± 11.37 min (Group A) vs 150.4 ± 28.74 min (Group C) (p = 0.72). Hospital stay was 3.82 ± 0.80 (Group A) vs 4.0 ± 1.09 (Group B) [p = 0.30] and 3.82 ± 0.80 (Group A) vs 2.7 ± 0.69 (Group C) [p < 0.0001]. Group B and Group C had one complication each. ConclusionUSG ACB irrespective of approach used remains the gold standard in providing consistent pain relief and thereby facilitating early discharge. However, increased operating room turnover time and repeated top-ups remain a disadvantage. Both the quantum of pain relief and the potential downsides remained the same irrespective of the surgical approach used and whether or not steroid was added to the cocktail used for infiltration. On the other hand, DACB provides a short lasting (24 h) adequate pain relief after TKR with similar low complication rates. The technique of DACB may have a potential for a wider use especially in centres where outpatient arthroplasties are performed, if newer longer acting anaesthetic/analgesic combinations are devised.

Comparison of Two Doses of Dexmedetomidine as Adjuvant to Ropivacaine in Ultrasound Guided Adductor Canal Block: Randomised Double-Blind Controlled Trial

Background: Adjuvants to local anesthetics (LA) have proven to prolong the analgesic efficacy of Adductor canal block (ACB). The ACB when administered with lower dose of LA produces analgesia without loss of motor control of the thigh. Hence we studied the efficacy of two different doses of dexmedetomidine in ACB to prolong postoperative analgesia when used as adjuvant to ropivacaine. Methods: Total of 90 patients between 18-65years undergoing arthroscopic ligament reconstructions surgeries of knee were randomized into three groups and given Ultrasound guided (USG) ACB. Group A - 0.2% Ropivacaine, Group B – 0.2% Ropivacaine plus Dexmedetomidine 0.50 mcg.kg-1 and Group C- 0.2% Ropivacaine plus Dexmedetomidine 1 mcg.kg-1. Primary aim of our intervention was to study the duration of post-operative analgesia and Secondary aim was to study the total dose of rescue analgesic required in 24hrs, success of early ambulation, level of patient satisfaction and any adverse effects. Results: The duration of analgesia was found highest in Group C (1166 ±200mins) than Group A (420±100mins) and Group B (702± 150mins). The total dose of tramadol consumption in 24 hours was highest in Group A. The number of steps walked postoperatively after 24 hours and level of patient satisfaction was maximum with Group C. Conclusion: Use of 1mcg.kg-1 of dexmedetomidine as adjuvant to 0.2% ropivacaine in ACB after arthroscopic knee surgeries significantly prolongs the duration of postoperative analgesia, reducing the total requirement of rescue analgesic without causing any untoward effects and preserving quadriceps strength aiding in early ambulation and recovery.

Evaluation of postoperative analgesic efficacy of dexmedetomidine as adjuvant with ropivacaine in ultrasound guided adductor canal block in patients undergoing unilateral Total Knee Replacement

The aim of anaesthesia in Total knee replacement (TKR) is to provide adequate analgesia and early ambulation. The recent success of adductor canal block in providing post-operative analgesia and achieving early ambulation has evoked interest in studying the effects of local anaesthetic agents and various adjuvants.This study was a randomized three arm parallel group comparative study conducted in a tertiary care center in India on 135 patients undergoing unilateral total knee replacement under spinal anaesthesia. After completion of the surgery, the adductor canal block was performed with ultrasound guidance at mid-thigh level in all three groups. In group A, 20 ml 0.375% ropivacaine was only used but in group B and C Dexmedetomidine was added to ropivacaine (total volume of 20 ml; 0.375%) at a dose of 0.25 µg/kg and 0.50 µg/kg respectively. The primary outcome of the study was to compare duration of analgesia after the adductor canal block. Duration to rescue analgesia (in hours) was significantly longer [Group A: 15.71±4.87; Group B: 16.44±6.21; Group C: 19.78±5.57 (p=0.014)] and total opioid (24 hours tramadol needed in mg) consumption [Group A: 60.00±13.94; Group B: 52.22±18.80; Group C: 33.33±13.95 (p=0.033)] was significantly lower in Group C. NRS scores both at movement and rest were significantly lesser in Group C at 18 and 24 hours timepoints. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in Group C with 46.67% patient reporting better than expected peri-operative experience (p=0.022).The addition of dexmedetomidine, 0.5 µg/kg to 0.375% ropivacaine in adductor canal block results in longer duration of analgesia, less 24 hours opioid consumption, better motor strength and better patient satisfaction without any adverse effect after unilateral total knee replacement surgery.

Periarticular Local Infiltrative Anesthesia and Regional Adductor Canal Block Provide Equivalent Pain Relief After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

To compare postoperative pain and recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in patients who received an adductor canal block (ACB) or periarticular local infiltrative anesthesia (LIA). A retrospective review of a prospectively collected ACL registry was performed. Patients underwent ACLR at a single institution between January 2015 and September 2020 and received long-acting local anesthesia with a preoperative ultrasound-guided ACB or periarticular LIA after surgery. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, milligram morphine equivalents (MME) consumed in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), and total hospital recovery time were compared. Univariate analysis was used to compare VAS pain and MME totals between overall groups and groups propensity score matched for age, sex, body mass index, graft type, and meniscal treatment. Results are presented as mean (95%CI) unless otherwise indicated. There were 265 knees (253 patients) included (LIA, 157 knees; ACB, 108 knees). Overall, VAS pain scores before hospital discharge (LIA: 2.6 [2.4-2.8] vs ACB: 2.4 [2.1-2.7]; P= .334) and total MMEs were similar (LIA: 17.6 [16.4-18.8] vs ACB: 18.5 [17.2-19.8] (MME); P=.134). Median time to discharge also did not significantly differ (LIA: 137.5 [IQR: 116-178] vs. ACB: 147 [IQR: 123-183] (min); P= .118). Matched subanalysis (LIA and ACB; n= 94) did not reveal significant differences in VAS pain before discharge (LIA: 2.4 [2.1-2.7] vs ACB: 2.7 [2.4-3.0]; P= .134) or total MMEs (LIA: 18.6 (17.2-20.0) vs ACB: 17.9 (16.4-19.4); P= .520). The use of ACB or LIA resulted in similar early pain levels, opioid consumption, and hospital recovery times after ACLR surgery. III, retrospective comparison study.

Comparison of two different volumes of 0.5%, ropivacaine used in ultrasound-guided adductor canal block after knee arthroplasty: A randomized, blinded, controlled noninferiority trial.

Background and Aims:The aim of this study was to establish noninferiority of 10 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine as compared to 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine; for choosing right dose in adductor canal block (ACB) after knee arthroplasty (KA), this trial was conducted.Material and Methods:Forty patients undergoing bilateral KA with postoperative ultrasound-aided ACB were randomized: Group A patients received 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine in the right limb and 10 mL 0.5% ropivacaine in the left limb. Group B patients received 10 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine in the right limb and 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine in the left limb. Catheter is positioned for intermittent boluses every 12-h up to 48 h.Results:In the final analysis (excluding six patients) based on split-body design between Group I (comprising 34 limbs which received 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine) and Group II (comprising 34 limbs which received 10 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine), baseline demographic data were collected. Length of the limb from anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) to the base of the patella was comparable between two groups: Group I (in cm; 149 ± 1.63) versus Group II (in cm; 149.5 ± 1.51) (P = 0.49, 95% CI of – 1.98 to 0.98). Primary outcomes, that is, quadriceps muscle strength, show a significant difference (P < 0.025) at various timeline. Secondary outcome pain scores and degree of knee flexion at various time intervals showed no significant difference. There was zero incidence of fall of the patient and no significant complication due to catheter was reported leading to discontinuation of catheter use in both groups.Conclusion:10 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine is noninferior to 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine in providing postoperative analgesia with preserved quadriceps muscle strength.

Evaluation of ultrasound-guided adductor canal block with two different concentration of bupivacaine in arthroscopic knee surgery: A feasibility study.

The application of regional anaesthesia techniques as a component of multimodal analgesia in knee arthroscopic surgeries increases the quality of postoperative analgesia. Adductor canal block (ACB) is an effective "motor sparing" analgesia technique used in knee surgeries. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ACB using two different concentrations of local anaesthetic in terms of analgesic requirements and pain density in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy. Prospective, randomised, controlled. Tertiary hospital. A total of 60 patients (ASA I-II) were evaluated in three groups, with 20 patients in each group. Standardised postoperative analgesia was performed in all groups. In addition, ultrasound-guided ACB (same volume/two different concentrations of bupivacaine: 0.25% vs 0.16%) was applied to the experimental groups. Tramadol consumption, rescue analgesic requirement and Numeric Rating Scores (NRS). Tramadol requirement in the first 24hours was significantly higher in the control group (209.5±23.27mg) (P<.001), and there was no difference between the experimental groups (63±42.06mg vs 80.5±36.63mg). Although the mean NRS scores in the first three hours were higher in the control group when compared with both block groups, it was similar in all groups in the following measurements. In arthroscopic knee surgery, ACB interventions with 0.25% and 0.16% concentrations of bupivacaine were similar in terms of postoperative analgesic efficacy, and they increased the quality of multimodal analgesics when compared with the control group.

The impact of IPACK combined with adductor canal block under ultrasound guidance on early motor function after total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the impact of Infiltration between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the posterior Knee (IPACK) combined with an adductor canal block under the guidance of ultrasound on early motor function after Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). MethodsA sample of 60 cases who were scheduled for elective unilateral TKA were divided into two groups using random number table method: a group with IPACK combined with an adductor canal block (I group, n = 30), and a group with femoral nerve block combined with superior popliteal sciatic nerve block (FS group, n = 30). Before anesthesia induction was completed, the patients in I group received an ultrasound-guided adductor canal block with 15 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine and an IPACK block with 25 mL of ropivacaine, and the patients in FS group received a femoral nerve block and a superior popliteal sciatic nerve block with 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine under ultrasound guidance. Post-operation, all the patients received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia combined with an oral celecoxib capsule to relieve pain and maintain a visual analogue scale score of ≤ 3. ResultsThe quadriceps femoris muscle strength score was significantly higher in Ⅰ group than in FS group (p = 0.001), while the modified Bromage score were significantly lower and walking distance results were significantly higher in Ⅰ group than in FS group (both p = 0.000). ConclusionCompared with femoral nerve block combined with superior popliteal sciatic nerve block, IPACK combined with adductor canal block had a mild impact on early motor functions after TKA.

Comparison between Dexmedetomidine and Clonidine as an Adjuvant to Ropivacaine in Ultrasound-Guided Adductor Canal Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Total Knee Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background:Total knee replacement (TKR) surgeries are associated with significant postoperative pain. Ultrasound-guided adductor canal block is associated with better pain scores. The addition of Clonidine and Dexmedetomidine as additives to local anesthetics was the recent focus of interest. However, there are minimal studies comparing the duration of analgesia as additives to Ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided adductor canal block for TKRs.Materials and Methods:Prospective, randomized, double-blind design was followed. One hundred and two American Society of Anesthesiologists I to III patients undergoing unilateral TKR surgeries were included in the study and randomized into two groups. Group C received Clonidine 150 mcg and Group D received Dexmedetomidine 100 mcg as an add on to 30 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine for adductor canal block. Postoperatively, duration of analgesia, sedation score, rescue analgesic requirement, hemodynamics, and any other adverse effects were monitored.Results:The total duration of analgesia in Group D (16.01 h [standard deviation [S. D]-0.5]) was significantly higher as compared to Group C (13.02 h [S. D-0.5]) (P < 0.0001). The numerical rating score (NRS) was significantly lower in Group D compared to Group C (P < 0.05) at multiple postoperative timelines. Group D (2.25(S. D-0.44)) had better sedation scores as compared to Group C (2 [S. D-0]) (P = 0.001).Conclusion:Dexmedetomidine has longer duration, lower pain, and better sedation scores as compared to clonidine in adductor canal blocks for postoperative pain relief in TKR surgeries.

Ultrasound Guided Adductor Canal Block vs Intra Articular Analgesia for Post-operative Pain Relief after Arthroscopic Knee Surgeries: A Comparative Evaluation.

Context and Aims:Our aim was to assess the postoperative analgesia after ultrasound-guided “Adductor canal block” (ACB) and “Intraarticular Analgesia” (IAA) in arthroscopic knee surgeries postoperatively.Settings and Design:This experimental, randomized prospective study was conducted in the Department of Anesthesia, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun.Subjects and Methods:Sixty patients, who underwent arthroscopic knee surgeries were divided into two groups, with 30 patients each. Each group was given spinal anesthesia using 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine. After completion of surgery, Group I patients were given ultrasound-guided ACB, Group II patients were given IAA. Postoperatively, pain was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Time of first analgesic requirement and total postoperative tramadol consumption in the 1st 24 h were recorded.Results:No significant difference was seen between both groups pertaining to patient's demographic data, type, and duration of surgery. The difference in the median NRS score between both the groups at different time intervals was statistically insignificant (P > 0.05). Total tramadol consumption in Group I (172.85 ± 82.59) mg was more than Group II (157.85 ± 33.83) mg. The duration of first analgesic requirement was 351.43 min, 342.86 min for Group I and II, respectively.Conclusion:To conclude, both ACB and IAA provide good postoperative pain control in arthroscopic knee surgeries with no significant difference in pain scores and postoperative analgesic requirement.

Ultrasound-guided adductor canal block combined with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block for post-operative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled study.

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether adductor canal block (ACB) combined with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block (LFCNB) could improve the efficacy of post-operative analgesia in a comparison with a standard peri-articular infiltration analgesia (PIA) after a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). One hundred and sixty patients of scheduled unilateral primary TKA were randomly allocated into two groups for post-operative analgesia. Eighty cases were treated with ACB combined with LFCNB and the other eighty treated with PIA. The primary outcomes were pain visual analogue scale (VAS) and rescue pain killer consumption, and the secondary outcomes were knee active range of motion (ROM), quadriceps strength, patients' ambulation ability, Knee Society Score (KSS), length of hospital stay, and adverse events. We found that ACB combined with LFCNB was better on decreasing the post-operative pain score within 12hours at rest and 8h with activity (p < 0.05) and provided longer duration of analgesia (19.91 ± 5.09 VS 12.06 ± 3.67h, p < 0.01) and less rescue morphine consumption (13.63 ± 9.84 vs 18.00 ± 11.52mg, p = 0.011) than the PIA. There was no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05) in terms of knee ROM, quadriceps strength, daily mobilization distance, KSS, and complication occurrence. ACB combined with LFCNB provides a significantly better pain control, less opioid consumption, and longer duration of analgesia than peri-articular infiltration while preserving muscle function without affecting knee functional recovery nor the length of stay or side effects occurrence.

Comparison of the efficacy of ultrasound guided adductor canal block versus intra-articular infiltration in providing post-operative analgesia after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament repair surgery

Ultrasound guided adductor canal block (ACB) is a modality for providing analgesia after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament repair surgery. Intra-articular infiltration of analgesics in the knee joint acts on the free nerve endings at the operative site and provides analgesia. We aim to compare the analgesic efficacy and opioid consumption between these two modalities.Sixty patients were randomized to receive either ACB under ultrasound guidance (group A) or intra-articular infiltration (group B). Post-operatively time of rescue analgesia and opioid consumption were noted. Quality of analgesia was assessed every 2 hours until 6 hours, then every 6 hours until 24 hour post-operative period between the two groups. Data was analysed statistically and P value &amp;#60; 0.05 was considered significant.: Time of rescue analgesia was comparable in both the groups (p value 0.4317). NRS scores in ACB group and intra-articular infiltration group were comparable till first 6 hours (p value 0.4519) but increased in intra-articular infiltration group at 12 hour (p value &amp;#60;0.0001) and 18 hour (p value &amp;#60;0.0117) as compared to group receiving ACB. The opioid consumption was more in intra-articular infiltration group than ACB group although not statistically significant (p value 0.6319).ACB is a better modality for postoperative analgesia after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament repair surgery as analgesia of intra-articular infiltration wears off in 12-24 hour period which is crucial for early ambulation and from rehabilitation point of view.

Comparative study between continuous adductor canal block and intravenous morphine for postoperative analgesia in total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundPostoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is known to range from moderate (30% of patients) to severe (60% of patients). Inadequate management for postoperative pain may induce various immobility-related complications, muscle weakness, and chronic pain. Therefore, post-TKA analgesia is crucial, not only for patients’ satisfaction, but for improving surgical outcomes and reducing complications. The present study aims to compare the effect of ultrasound-guided adductor canal block ACB (saphenous nerve block) versus incremental dose of intravenous morphine after total knee arthroplasty surgery.ResultsThe results of this study revealed no difference between group A and group B as regards postoperative quadriceps muscle strength; maximal knee flexion, total distance ambulated, and postoperative vital data (heart rate per minute and respiratory rate per minute). However, group A showed better postoperative pain control, lower doses of intravenous morphine consumption and lower incidence of nausea and vomiting.ConclusionContinuous adductor canal block (saphenous nerve block) is superior to intravenous morphine in decreasing postoperative pain and decreasing total morphine consumption and adverse effects as nausea and vomiting, but both are equivalent in preserving quadriceps muscle power.

Adductor canal block to manage flexion contracture deformity (FCD) of knee before total knee replacement (TKR) \u2010 a case report

BackgroundThe fixed contracture deformity (FCD) which is often present in patients awaiting total knee replacement (TKR) affects the surgical outcome. Therefore, it is necessary to reduce the severity of the FCD before the TKR surgery. Physiotherapy, including active stretching and exercise to increase range of motion are commonly practiced techniques. However, due to the presence of pain, patients are often unable to cooperate and perform exercise up-to the desired levels. We used continuous adductor canal block (CACB) in two patients with severe FCD scheduled for TKR surgery to decrease their pain during physiotherapy and to help them in increasing their range of motion to achieve early fitness for surgery. This approach is not documented and published earlier in the medical literature.Case presentationTwo female patients aged 58 and 68 years were scheduled for TKR surgery with severe flexion contracture deformity of both limbs (70°–90°). Due to severe contracture deformity surgeon suggested improvement in ROM before surgery. Ultrasound-guided adductor canal block was given, and catheters were inserted in the adductor canal. Continuous infusion of local anesthetic and bolus injection before active stretching was given. Both patients had good pain relief in existing arthritic pain and pain during active stretching. The flexion deformity was reduced in both the patients up to 30°. The technique of adductor can block with continuous infusion also provided excellent postoperative analgesia and helped in early mobilization without affecting the muscle strength of lower limbs.ConclusionIn two patients of severe flexion contracture deformity, the continuous adductor canal block helped to reduce the degree of deformity before the total knee replacement surgery. It also provided excellent pain relief in postoperative pain and helped in early postoperative mobilization without muscle weakness.

Ultrasound-guided adductor canal block for postoperative analgesia in total knee arthroplasty: where and how should we perform it?

Ultrasound-guided adductor canal block for postoperative analgesia in total knee arthroplasty: where and how should we perform it?

Safety and Efficacy of Magnesium Sulfate Added to Levobupivacaine in Ultrasound-Guided Adductor Canal Block for Post-operative Analgesia in Patient Subjected to Total Knee Arthroplasty

Safety and Efficacy of Magnesium Sulfate Added to Levobupivacaine in Ultrasound-Guided Adductor Canal Block for Post-operative Analgesia in Patient Subjected to Total Knee Arthroplasty

Retrospective Analysis of Pain Relief in Total Knee Replacement Surgeries.

Background and Aims:The aim of the study is to measure the postoperative adequacy of pain relief and functional recovery after unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty or total knee replacement (TKR) with a multimodal approach.Settings and Design:This was a retrospective observational study done in a tertiary care center.Materials and Methods:Eighty patients aged 18–65 years (yrs) with ASA Physical Status Classes I, II, and III operated for unilateral primary TKR surgery under suitable Anaesthesia and was administered ultrasound-guided adductor canal block + periarticular infiltration (PI) from January 2018 to January 2019 were included. Thereafter, the patients visual analog scale (VAS) scores at rest, 45° knee flexion, and mobilization as well as additional analgesia given were noted after going through the records at following time points: 12 hourly for 24 h and thereafter on postoperative day 1 (POD1) and POD2. Level of block, adverse events, and functional recovery (time up and go [TUG] test, 10 s walk test) on POD1 and POD2 were also noted.Statistical Analysis and Results:The statistical software namely SPSS 18.0 were used for the analysis of the data. The mean VAS score at 12 h was 4.33 ± 1.3 which worsened at 24 h with steady improvement over the next 2 days. Similarly, the case with a mean VAS score at 45° flexion and on mobilization showed a similar trend. At 12 h postadductor block, besides intravenous (i.v.) paracetamol, 32.6% of patients were given tramadol 50 mg i.v. whereas one patient was given a buprenorphine patch in addition to tramadol. The number of patients requiring additional tramadol and buprenorphine patch steadily increased over the next 2 days. The average time taken for the TUG test at 24 h was 30.98 ± 4.77 s, and the average time taken for the 10 s walk test at 24 h was 6.16 ± 1.10 steps with improvement in performance over the next 2 days.Conclusion:In our study, our multimodal analgesia model did not provide satisfactory analgesia though mobilization was not hampered.

Ultrasound-Guided Adductor Canal Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgery

Ultrasound-Guided Adductor Canal Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgery