Ulnar Impaction Syndrome Research Articles

Ulnar impaction syndrome: how to diagnose and treat?

Ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS), also called ulnocarpal abutment syndrome, is a degenerative condition induced by repeated loads on the ulnocarpal joint and is a representative cause of ulnar-sided wrist pain. Because of the small, complex, and overlapping anatomy of the ulnar wrist, ulnar wrist pathologies often present very similar symptoms to those of UIS, which causes confusion in diagnosing UIS. Thus, careful history-taking, clinical examinations, and diagnostic imaging are essential for the diagnosis of UIS. As appropriate and effective treatment for UIS, early surgical treatment should be considered if patients cannot reduce their wrist usage in daily living and work and have distal radioulnar instability. There are various surgical techniques for UIS. Surgeons should be deliberate in choosing a technique and pay attention to accompanying disorders around the ulnar wrist to achieve satisfactory treatment outcomes.

Outcomes of ulna shortening osteotomy: a cohort analysis of 106 patients

BackgroundUlna shortening osteotomy (USO) for ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) aims to improve pain and function by unloading the ulnar carpus. Previous studies often lack validated patient-reported outcomes or have small sample sizes. The primary objective of this study was to investigate patient-reported pain and hand function at 12 months after USO for UIS. Secondary objectives were to investigate the active range of motion, grip strength, complications, and whether outcomes differed based on etiology.Materials and methodsWe report on 106 patients with UIS who received USO between 2012 and 2019. In 44 of these patients, USO was performed secondary to distal radius fracture. Pain and function were measured with the Patient Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) before surgery and at 3 and 12 months after surgery. Active range of motion and grip strength were measured before surgery and at 3 and 12 months after surgery. Complications were scored using the International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurement Complications in Hand and Wrist conditions (ICHAW) tool.ResultsThe PRWHE total score improved from a mean of 64 (SD = 18) before surgery to 40 (22) at 3 months and 32 (23) at 12 months after surgery (P < 0.001; effect size Cohen’s d = −1.4). There was no difference in the improvement in PRWHE total score (P = 0.99) based on etiology. Also, no clinically relevant changes in the active range of motion were measured. Independent of etiology, mean grip strength improved from 24 (11) before surgery to 30 (12) at 12 months (P = 0.001). Sixty-four percent of patients experienced at least one complication, ranging from minor to severe. Of the 80 complications in total, 50 patients (47%) had complaints of hardware irritation, of which 34 (32%) had their hardware removed. Six patients (6%) needed refixation because of nonunion.ConclusionWe found beneficial outcomes in patients with UIS that underwent USO, although there was a large variance in the outcome and a relatively high number of complications (which includes plate removals). Results of this study may be used in preoperative counseling and shared decision-making when considering USO.Level of evidenceTherapeutic III.

Do triangular fibrocartilage complex foveal injuries affect the clinical outcome of ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome?

BackgroundUlnar shortening osteotomy (USO), as its name implies, is used to shorten the ulna. It subsequently tightens the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) and ulnar wrist. TFCC foveal insertion is a primary stabilizer of the distal radioulnar joint. It is unclear whether USO is effective in TFCC foveal injuries. The purpose of this study was to review the clinical outcomes of ulnar shortening osteotomies with and without TFCC foveal injuries. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients with ulnar wrist pain treated with USO and wrist arthroscopy including the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). Sixty-five patients were included in this study. An algorithm was used to guide surgical decision-making. After arthroscopic confirmation of ulnar impaction syndrome, we performed USO with a locking compression plate (mean length of shortening, 2.7 mm; range, 1–7.5 mm). The flattened TFCC disc due to ulnar shortening was confirmed arthroscopically. If the DRUJ was unstable after USO, we repaired the TFCC foveal insertion. ResultsThere were 32 post-traumatic and 33 idiopathic cases. We detected TFCC disc injuries in 34 wrists and TFCC foveal injuries in 33 wrists; both types were found in 15 wrists. TFCC foveal injuries were not significantly correlated with patient age, history of trauma, or clinical outcome. Most patients showed good clinical outcomes; 31 of 65 patients had preoperative DRUJ instability, with a significant number having foveal but not disc injuries. ConclusionUSO achieved reasonable outcomes, even in patients with TFCC foveal injuries. In cases demonstrating ulnar impaction, USO should be prioritized over TFCC repair.

Comparing radial lengthening osteotomy with ulnar shortening osteotomy to treat ulnar impaction syndrome after distal radius fracture malunion.

Distal radius mal-unions often cause radius shortening and ulnar impaction syndrome. The modern treatments of ulnar impaction syndrome following distal radius mal-union are ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) and distal radius lengthening osteotomy (DRLO). However, there are few studies to compare long-term outcomes of these two treatments. This study compares isolated USO to DRLO for the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome following distal radius mal-union. We retrospectively reviewed 68 patients with extra-articular distal radius mal-unions treated by isolated USO in 36 patients and DRLO in 32 patients. Pain visual analog scale (VAS), wrist motion, grip strength, radiographic parameters including sigmoid inclination, DASH score, and perioperative complications were analyzed. Mean follow-up was 62.6months. The postoperative VAS scores for pain on exertion were less in the DRLO group than the USO group (1.2 vs. 2.8, p = 0.02). The DASH scores were 16.7 and 29.8 in the DRLO and USO groups, respectively (p = 0.02). The reduction of pain and improvement of function showed significantly better in the DRLO group. The mean operative time was shorter in the USO group. Most of the sigmoid inclinations were changed in DRLO. There were two re-operations following USO for painful nonunion and two patients had subsequent DRUJ osteoarthritis at the last follow-up. Although both treatments improved range of motion, grip strength, and VAS for pain, DRLO was found in better reduction of pain and improvement of function. USO is a simpler procedure with a shorter operative time but it has an increased potential to cause subsequent osteoarthritis of the DRUJ as its incongruity of DRUJ after USO especially in reverted inclination. DRLO can be a preferred method for treating USWP in relevant distal radial mal-union.

Stress distribution pattern in the distal radioulnar joint before and after ulnar shortening osteotomy in patients with ulnar impaction syndrome

Ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) for ulnar impaction syndrome potentially leads to degenerative changes of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). This study was performed to evaluate the effect of the sigmoid notch morphology on the stress distribution pattern of the DRUJ using computed tomography (CT) osteoabsorptiometry (CT-OAM). We reviewed the pre- and postoperative transverse CT images of 15 wrists that had undergone USO. The examined wrists were classified into two groups based on the sigmoid notch morphology: the linear-type notch (type L) and the curved-type notch (type C). We calculated and statistically compared the percentage of the high-density area (%HDA) in each divided region of the sigmoid notch. In type L, %HDA was significantly larger in the distal-dorsal region of the sigmoid notch before USO. Postoperatively, in type L, no specific regions showed a significantly different %HDA. In type C, %HDA was significantly larger in the distal-volar region of the sigmoid notch before USO. Postoperatively, %HDA of type C was significantly larger in the proximal-volar region. Our results suggest that in patients with ulnar impaction syndrome, morphological evaluation of the sigmoid notch can serve as a predictor of osteoarthritis in the DRUJ with or without USO.

The prevalence and risk factors of musculoskeletal disorders in the hands of fishermen working as oyster shuckers

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders in the hands and wrists of fishermen working as oyster shuckers, and to identify the risk factors associated with oyster shucking. A total of 590 fishery workers including those working as oyster shuckers in 2015-2017 were included in the study analysis. Hand osteoarthritis (OA), carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), and ulnar impaction syndrome were diagnosed using X-ray, magnetic resonance imaging, and physical examinations according to each diagnostic criterion. The Rapid Entire Body Assessment was used as a measurement tool for analyzing the occupation-related burden factors. The prevalence of hand OA, CTS, and ulnar impaction syndrome was higher in oyster shuckers than in aquaculture/offshore fishery workers. The prevalence of upper limb disease was higher in oyster shuckers than in other fishery workers, even in the prevalence of exposure to occupational burden factors. In oyster shuckers, the incidence of hand and wrist OA was 84%, that of CTS was 72%, and that of ulnar impaction syndrome was 41%. In addition, oyster shuckers were more likely to be exposed to occupational burden factors than were other types of fishermen. The prevalence of hand OA, CTS, and ulnar impaction syndrome was higher in oyster shuckers. Therefore, proper stretching or exercises for rest and musculoskeletal relaxation, along with health-care education and promotion, will be needed for the fishermen's repeated posture and impact work. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2021;34(5):603-15.

Lessons learned with the Cobra prosthesis in elderly patients with complex distal radius fractures\u2014a retrospective follow-up study

IntroductionRecently, the Cobra prostheses were introduced in the treatment of distal radius fractures (DRF) of elderly patients. Fracture prostheses provide an alternative treatment option for complex fractures where conservative therapy seems not acceptable and osteosynthesis seems not possible. Data reporting the feasibility of the Cobra prosthesis are sparse. Therefore, this retrospective follow-up study investigated the clinical and radiological mid-term outcome of the Cobra implant in complex DRFs of elderly patients.Materials and methodsThirteen patients (mean age 73.5 years, range 65–87 years) were retrospectively evaluated with at least a 1-year follow-up after surgery. Objective and subjective clinical parameters as well as the radiological outcome and complications were analyzed.ResultsThe mean follow-up period was 31.2 months. Seven cases required a cemented prosthesis. The mean relative range-of-motion compared to the healthy side was 72.3% and 51.8% for extension and flexion, respectively, and 87.9% and 85.7% for pronation and supination, respectively. The mean grip strength was 78.3% compared to the non-operated side. Eight patients were very satisfied, five patients were partly satisfied with the result. The DASH, PRWE, MHQ and Lyon-Scores averaged 39.1, 36.2, 64.9 and 63.3 points, respectively. The mean VAS-Score for pain was 1.1 at rest and 3.2 during activities. Perioperative complications included one dissection of the extensor pollicis longus tendon, one heterotopic ossification, one radiocarpal dislocation and two cases of an ulnar impaction syndrome due to implant subsidence.ConclusionThe prosthetic treatment of complex DRFs in elderly patients with the Cobra implant led to clinically and radiologically satisfactory mid-term results. The Cobra prosthesis still does not represent a gold standard but can be regarded as a feasible salvage option for complex DRFs when osteosyntheses may not be possible and non-operative treatment will lead to further functional restrictions and wrist pain during performing activities of daily life in high functional demand patients.

Ulna shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome: Impact of distal radioulnar joint morphology on clinical outcome

IntroductionTreatment of ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) is based on ulnocarpal decompression, which may be achieved by ulna shortening osteotomy. The aim is to restore zero or negative ulnar variance. Tolat et al. described 3 distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) morphologic types: vertical, oblique and reverse. Joint type has been thought to influence the clinical result of shortening, especially in the reverse type. HypothesisDRUJ type does not influence clinical results in ulna shortening osteotomy. Material and methodsTwenty-nine wrists were operated on in 27 patients: 13 female, 14 male; mean age at surgery, 43 years (range, 18–72 years). In 20 cases, UIS was idiopathic and in 7 post-traumatic. Mean preoperative ulnar variance was 3.6mm (range, 2–18mm). The osteotomy was fixed by screwed plate. ResultsTwenty-five patients (27 wrists) were assessed at a mean 64 months (range, 18 months to 13 years). There were no cases of infection or hematoma. DRUJ was type 1 (vertical) in 6 cases (22%), type 2 (oblique) in 14 (52%) and type 3 (reverse) in 7 (26%). Mean postoperative pain score on VAS was 0.7/10 (range, 0–4); 9 wrists remained painful. Mean Quick-DASH was 16.9 (range, 0–48) and mean PRWE 21.9 (range, 16.9–59). Thirteen patients were very satisfied, 11 satisfied, 1 moderately satisfied, and 2 dissatisfied. Mean postoperative ulnar variance was −0.1mm (range, −4 to +8mm). Three wrists developed osteoarthritis, all following traumatic UIS. There were no significant correlations between DRUJ type and other clinical or radiological parameters. DiscussionUlna shortening osteotomy has proven efficacy in UIS. The literature reports excellent or good results in 75% of cases. In the present study, 96% of patients considered themselves cured or improved by surgery, and none reported worsening. Ulna shortening osteotomy can be used in all 3 DRUJ types; DRUJ coronal morphology does not impact clinical result. Level of evidenceIV–retrospective study.

Evaluating Immediate and Short-Term Postoperative Clinical Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Ulnar Shortening for Ulnar Impaction Syndrome Using PROMIS.

Background The early recovery trajectory of patients undergoing ulnar shortening for ulnar impaction syndrome using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is unknown. Questions/Purposes Using PROMIS Upper Extremity (UE), Physical Function (PF), Pain Interference (PI), and Depression, we asked (1) do patients undergoing operative management for ulnar impaction syndrome present at their preoperative visit with notable impairment?; (2) At immediate follow-up, do patients present with a clinically appreciable change in symptom severity?; and (3) At short-term follow-up, do patients present with a clinically appreciable change in symptom severity? Materials and Methods We identified patients from 01/2017 to 12/2019 at our institution undergoing ulnar shortening for ulnar impaction syndrome who completed all PROMIS domains at a preoperative visit and at least one postoperative time point (i.e., less than 4 weeks and/or greater than 12 weeks). Distribution- and anchor-based minimal clinically important difference estimates were used to evaluate clinically appreciable changes in symptoms over time. Results A total of 38 patients met our inclusion criteria. The average change in PROMIS UE, PF, PI, and Depression scores from preoperative to immediate postoperative follow-up were -3.8, -4.3, 3.2, and 0.5, respectively. However, by short-term follow-up, the average change in PROMIS UE, PF, PI, and Depression scores were 3.7, 3.2, -4.7, and -3.9, respectively. Conclusions Patients have worsening function at the immediate postoperative follow-up. By short-term postoperative follow-up, functional status and PI levels improve. Our findings can help hand surgeons provide evidence-based guidance on expected initial recovery following operative management for ulnar impaction syndrome. Level of Evidence This is a level II, prognostic study.

Influence of TFCC foveal tear on the location of lunate chondromalacia in ulnar impaction syndrome.

The purpose of this study was to identify the location of lunate chondromalacia and to compare the difference in location according to presence or absence of triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) foveal tear, which induces distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability. We performed a retrospective study of 97 patients (102 wrists) who were diagnosed with and treated for idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) between 2014 and 2018. Subjects were divided into two groups according to presence or absence of TFCC foveal tear with DRUJ instability. Group I had UIS without a TFCC foveal tear (52 wrists, mean age of 43.2years), while Group II had UIS with a TFCC foveal tear (50 wrists, mean age of 45.3years). There was no significant difference in age, sex, or duration of symptoms between the two groups. All patients underwent wrist MR Arthrography (MRA) in the same gantry, and all scanned coronal sections of the lunate were standardized into 10 slices, including the whole anteroposterior width of the lunate. Each slice was sequentially numbered from dorsal to volar side, and the location of chondromalacia was marked in each numbered section. Radiological parameters including ulnar variance and ulnolunate distance (ULD), which indicated the distance between the ulnar head and lunate, were measured in the wrist series. The most frequent location of lunate chondromalacia was slightly to the volar side of the lunate in both groups. Group I showed a higher frequency of chondromalacia in the volar side of the lunate. In Group II, chondromalacia was identified with high frequency not only on the volar side of the lunate but also on the dorsal side. In other words, Group II showed broader chondromalacia in the lunate. There was no significant difference in ulnar variance (Group I, 3.19 ± 1.42mm; Group II, 2.76mm ± 1.67mm) or ulnolunate distance (Group I, 1.66 ± 0.94mm; Group II, 2.05mm ± 0.87mm). The average ULD decreased during radial deviation but increased during ulnar deviation. This study showed that lunate chondromalacia associated with idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome occurs more frequently on the volar side of the lunate. Also, TFCC foveal tear, which causes DRUJ instability, leads to broader lunate chondromalacia in idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome. Therefore, further analysis of the pattern of lunate chondromalacia can provide a clue for DRUJ instability.

Tips and tricks to achieve osteotomy healing and prevent refracture after ulnar shortening osteotomy

BackgroundParallel osteotomy is essential for favorable osteotomy reduction and healing and technically challenging during diaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO). This study aimed to evaluate the advantages of guided osteotomy for parallel osteotomy and reduction osteotomies, healing over freehand osteotomy. It also aimed to identify surgical factors affecting healing after diaphyseal USO.MethodsBetween June 2005 and March 2016, 136 wrists that had undergone diaphyseal USO for ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) were evaluated. The wrists were divided into two groups according to the osteotomy technique (group 1: freehand osteotomy, 74 wrists; group 2: guided osteotomy, 62 wrists). The osteotomy reduction gap and time to osteotomy healing (union and consolidation) were compared between the groups. A multiple regression test was performed to identify the surgical factors affecting healing. The cut-off length of the reduction gap to achieve osteotomy union on time and the cut-off period to decide the failure of complete consolidation were statistically calculated.ResultsThe baseline characteristics did not differ between the two groups. The osteotomy reduction gap and time to osteotomy union, and complete consolidation were shorter in group 2 than in group 1 (p = 0.002, < 0.001, 0.002). The osteotomy reduction gap was a critical surgical factor affecting both time to osteotomy union and complete consolidation (p < 0.001, < 0.001). The use of a dynamic compression plate affected only the time to complete consolidation (p < 0.001). The cut-off length of the osteotomy reduction gap to achieve osteotomy union on time was 0.85 mm. The cut-off period to decide the failure of complete consolidation was 23.5 months after osteotomy.ConclusionsThe minimal osteotomy reduction gap was the most important for timely osteotomy healing in the healthy ulna, and guided osteotomy was beneficial for reducing the osteotomy reduction gap.

Long-term radiographic outcomes and functional evaluation of ulnar shortening osteotomy in patients with ulnar impaction syndrome and reverse oblique sigmoid notch: a retrospective case series study

BackgroundUlnar shortening osteotomy (USO) is an effective treatment for ulnar impaction syndrome. However, there have been reports of osteoarthritis (OA) at the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) when USO was performed on patients with a reverse oblique sigmoid notch. This study aimed to evaluate the radiographic and functional outcomes following USO in patients with a reverse oblique sigmoid notch.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients having a reverse oblique sigmoid notch who underwent USO for ulnar impaction syndrome between 2002 and 2013. We evaluated radiographic changes of the DRUJ and functional outcomes of patients.ResultsWe enrolled 22 patients (22 wrists) with an average age of 49.6 years and a mean follow-up of 93.2 (range, 36–179; standard deviation [SD], 38.2) months. We found that there were changes in the inclination angle of the sigmoid notch, from an average reverse oblique of 14.9o (range, 11o–23o; SD, 3.4o) preoperatively to a more parallel 5.1o (range, 0o–11o; SD, 3.2o) at the final follow-up. The functional results at the final follow-up were good, with a mean visual analogue scale for pain of 0.2 (range, 0–1; SD, 0.4) at rest and 1.3 (range, 0–3; SD, 0.9) during activity, QuickDASH of 15.1 (range, 2.3–34.1; SD, 8.8), and modified Mayo Wrist Score of 91.6 (range, 70–100; SD, 6.4). Seven wrists (31.8%) had changes compatible with OA, but the wrists did not exhibit a significantly worse function when compared to wrists without OA changes, except for supination motion and grip strength.ConclusionsFor patients with a reverse oblique sigmoid inclination following USO, we observed that the inclination angle had a tendency to become parallel and some patients developed OA at the DRUJ. However, long-term functional outcomes could still be good. The reverse oblique sigmoid inclination does not seem to be an absolute contraindication for USO.

Semiquantitative single-photon-emission computed tomography /computed tomography study to evaluate concomitant ulnar impaction syndrome in patients presenting with triangular fibrocartilage complex tears.

IntroductionPatients presenting with tears of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) can have ulnar positive variance, for which the clinical relevance to concomitant ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) may be unclear. We hypothesized that maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), a semiquantitative single-photon-emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) value, would distinguish between the traumatic TFCC tear and degenerative TFCC tear associated with the UIS. This study aimed to compare SUVmax between patients with TFCC tear only and patients with TFCC tear and UIS.MethodsA total of 26 patients presenting with TFCC tears on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) underwent semiquantitative SPECT/CT examinations. The diagnosis of concomitant UIS was made based on positive ulnar impaction tests and MRI findings. We compared the SUVmax between patients with and without concomitant UIS. We also calculated the cutoff value for the diagnosis of UIS using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.ResultsOf 26 patients, 14 had concomitant UIS, and 12 had TFCC tears only. The SUVmax was significantly higher in patients with concomitant UIS than in those without UIS (p = 0.048). With a SUVmax cutoff value of 4.09 for UIS, sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 82% were obtained.ConclusionsIn the semiquantitative SPECT/CT examinations of patients with TFCC tears, those with concomitant UIS had a higher SUVmax than those without UIS. Semiquantitative SPECT/CT can be helpful in confirming concomitant UIS in patients with TFCC tears.

Wrist arthroscopy combined with 2.7 mm titanium osteotomy plate fixation in treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome

Wrist arthroscopy combined with 2.7 mm titanium osteotomy plate fixation in treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome

Ulna shortening osteotomy versus arthroscopic wafer procedure in the treatment of ulnocarpal impingement syndrome

Post-traumatic or constitutional ulnar impaction syndrome can be treated by shortening the ulna. This can be achieved by diaphyseal or metaphyseal osteotomy, or by arthroscopic epiphyseal resection. The objective of this study was to compare the results of the diaphyseal shortening osteotomy (USO) and arthroscopic wafer procedure (AWP) of the ulna in this indication. This was a retrospective case series of 33 patients operated for ulnar impaction syndrome by the same surgeon between 1997 and 2017. The diagnosis was made based on pain on the ulnar edge of the wrist with positive provocative tests. Radiographs were made and CT arthrography or MRI were used to confirm the diagnosis. Per-and post-operative assessments were functional (DASH and PRWE scores), clinical (pain, range of motion and grip strength) and radiographic. Diaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) was performed in 9 patients using a volar plate and a cutting guide. Twenty-four patients underwent an arthroscopic wafer procedure. Mean follow-up was 103 ± 8 months in the USO group versus 55 ± 4 months in the AWP group. There was no significant difference between groups in pain levels (1.2/10 in the USO group versus 0.9/10 in the AWP group, p = 0.88), grip strength (39 Kg in the USO group versus 34 Kg in the AWP group, p = 0.27) and PRWE score (5,8/100 in the USO group versus 11,2 in the AWP group, p = 0.34), and DASH score (25/100 in the USO group versus 28 in the AWP group, p = 0.63). The time away from work was long in the USO group than in the AWP group (7.86 months versus 3.75 months) (p = 0.002). Seven patients were reoperated in the USO group (5 plate removal, 1 nonunion and 1 delayed union) versus 3 in the AWP group (1 ECU stabilization, 1 ablation for painful ulnar styloid due to nonunion and 1 wrist denervation) (p = 0.0004). The study found no clinical differences between these two techniques except the return to work time. In our series, diaphyseal USO was associated with a greater number of reoperations than the AWP.

Refracture after plate removal following ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome – a retrospective case–control study

Refracture after plate removal following ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) is a rare, but very distressing for both the patient and surgeon. This case–control study was performed to identify predictive factors for refracture incidence. A total of 245 patients, who had undergone USO between 2008 and 2018 were included in the study. We evaluated the basic demographic characteristics/clinical factors preoperatively. Radiological variables, such as dorsal subluxation of the ulna and pre/postoperative ulnar variance, and variables associated with operative conditions, such as triangular fibrocartilage complex degeneration classification, the use of a parallel double-blade saw, the type of plate, number of screws, and plate position, were investigated. Finally, the accuracy of osteotomy and any traces of incomplete healing after plate removal were evaluated. The no-refracture group consisted of 234 patients, whereas the refracture group consisted of eleven patients. The results of univariate analyses revealed that age, bone mineral density, accuracy of osteotomy, and presence of osteotomy traces were significantly associated with refracture. However, during multivariate analysis, low BMD was the only factor significantly associated with refracture. Nevertheless, the accuracy of osteotomy and absence of osteotomy traces were strongly associated with each other in the no-refracture group (p < 0.001, Cram’s V coefficient = 0.36). Low BMD was sole independent predicting factor of refracture after plate removal in USO. Additionally, precise parallel osteotomy is critical for safety after plate removal following USO. Subsequent healing with no radiological traces of osteotomy after plate removal would be associated with absence of refracture. Level of Evidence Level III, case–control study.

Arthroscopic treatment of chronic wrist pain after distal radius fractures.

We report the arthroscopic and clinical findings of patients with chronic wrist pain following distal radius fracture (DRF) who underwent diagnostic arthroscopy and arthroscopically-assisted tailored treatment.We retrospectively analyzed the records of 15 patients with chronic wrist pain following DRF, who underwent diagnostic arthroscopy and arthroscopically-assisted tailored treatment from 2010 to 2017. The average patient age was 44 years (range, 20–68 years), average time from injury to treatment 21 ± 23.46 months (range, 3–96 months) and average follow up period 20.13 ± 8.71 months (range, 12–39 months). The functional outcome was evaluated by comparing the preoperative and final follow up values of the range of motion, grip strength, pinch strength, visual analogue scale for pain and quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score.Based on the arthroscopic findings, synovitis was found in all cases and the pathologic intra-articular lesions were classified into 4 patterns. Triangular fibrocartilage complex rupture was seen in 14 cases, intercarpal and radiocarpal ligament ruptures in 9 cases, ulnar impaction syndrome in 5 cases, and cartilage lesion in 9 cases. In terms of surgical treatment, 15 patients underwent arthroscopic synovectomy, 7 foveal or capsular repair of TFCC, 7 intercarpal Kirschner wires fixation or intercarpal thermal shrinkage, 1 intercarpal ligament reconstruction, 2 Sauve-Kapandji procedure, and 2 unlar shortening osteotomy. Postoperatively, the average range of motion, grip strength, and pinch strength increased significantly. From preoperative to final follow up values, the average visual analogue scale and quick disabilities of the arm score decreased from 5.93 ± 1.58 (range, 3–8) to 1.33 ± 1.29 (range, 0–3) (P = .001) and from 49.38 ± 19.09 to 12.63 ± 7.63 (P = .001), respectively.Diagnostic arthroscopy and arthroscopically-assisted tailored treatment of chronic wrist pain following DRF can provide an accurate diagnosis, significant pain relief, and functional improvement.

Arthroscopic Repair of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tear

Triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) is an important structure for stability of distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) and shock absorption of ulnocarpal joint. Recent studies on anatomy and biomechanics of TFCC have revealed that the deep fiber of distal radioulnar ligament plays a key role in stabilizing the DRUJ. Clinicians should evaluate the presence of the instability of DRUJ or ulnar impaction syndrome. If necessary, combined TFCC foveal repair and ulnar shortening osteotomy should be performed. This article introduces the authors’ preferred procedure of arthroscopic TFCC repair with satisfactory clinical outcomes.

Inevitable nonunion after ulnar shortening osteotomy in patients with ulnar impaction syndrome and breast cancer under bisphosphonate treatment.

Nonunion after ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) was observed at a high rate in patients undergoing long-term bisphosphonate (BP) maintenance treatment after breast cancer surgery. Here, we report the unique features of these nonunions. In total, 485 patients who had undergone USO between March 2008 and September 2017 were screened for inclusion based on the following criteria: (1) definitive nonunion after USO; (2) prior history of or ongoing BP therapy after the diagnosis of breast cancer; and (3) no evidence of metastasis in the ulna treated with USO, as determined based on the radiological evaluation. Five patients with histories of breast cancer and subsequent BP treatment were identified; all (100%) of these patients showed definitive nonunion after USO. The mean age was 56.2years, and all ulnae were on the contralateral side to that of the original breast cancer. Intravenous Ibandronate® and Zolendronate® were administrated to one and four patients, respectively. The mean period of administration was 67.8months. Three patients exhibited suspicious lesions impending atypical fracture on their femurs, and the other two patients were treated by intramedullary nailing after the occurrence of atypical fractures. Radiological evaluation revealed no evidence of a metastatic lesion, including in the musculoskeletal system, in any patient. Osteosynthesis was performed with cancellous iliac bone graft and mean of 4.3months after osteosynthesis, union in all cases was achieved. Problems associated with BP treatment are well known. Even in cases in which the agent is essential for preventing bony metastasis of breast cancer, the normal bony physiology, including bone turnover and healing, is likely to be compromised. In addition to atypical fractures of the femur and ulna, procedures such as USO are likely to be affected by BP. Furthermore, not only a primary iliac bone graft but also other method (oblique osteotomy) should be needed to avoid nonunion during plating in USO. IV, Retrospective case series.

Clinical and Epidemiological Features Among Patients with Wrist Arthroscopy Surgery: A Hospital-based Study in China.

ProposeTo analyze the clinical and epidemiological features of patients who underwent wrist arthroscopy procedures.MethodsThis is a cross‐sectional epidemiological study. The study included a cohort of patients who underwent wrist arthroscopy procedures in a national orthopaedic referral center from 1 February, 2014 to 1 February, 2019. The medical records, diagnosis, and every wrist arthroscopy procedure of all the patients were collected and reviewed. The epidemiological features, detail of the diagnoses, and the procedures of all the patients were systemically analyzed. All the patients were divided into two groups: trauma and non‐trauma conditions. The complexity of the wrist arthroscopy procedure was classified into simple procedures (exploration or debridement) and complex procedures (repair or reconstruction). χ2 test was used to compare proportions between the procedures of different complexity and the two groups of patients.ResultsA total of 533 patients (332 males and 201 females) were included in this study. More than half (56%) of the patients were in the age group 21–40 and nearly two thirds (62%) of all the 533 patients were male. The diagnoses of all the patients could be classified into eight categories: (i) TFCC injury; (ii) ulnar impactions syndrome; (iii) carpal trauma (carpal bone fractures and/or carpal ligament injures); (iv) distal radius fractures; (v) carpal bone cyst or necrosis; (vi) ganglion cyst; (vii) wrist arthritis; and (viii) disorders of small joint of the hand. The most common conditions treated with wrist arthroscopy were TFCC injury (172 cases), followed by carpal trauma (125 cases) and ulnar impaction syndrome (84 cases). The simple arthroscopic procedures (exploration or debridement) account for 53% of all the procedures while complex reparative or reconstructive procedures account for 47%. There was a significant difference in the proportion between simple procedures and complex procedures in both trauma and non‐traumatic patients. Repair or reconstruction procedures were more frequently performed for wrist trauma patients, whereas exploration or debridement procedures were more frequently performed for non‐trauma patients.ConclusionsThe largest group of patients who underwent wrist arthroscopy surgery are those who complained of ulnar‐sided wrist pain and the commonly conducted wrist arthroscopy procedures have evolved from simple exploration/debridement to the more complex repair or reconstruction procedures in China.