UK Firms Research Articles

Leveraging social capital for digital transformation: The role of ambidexterity and familial orientation

In pursuing competitive advantage, businesses are diffusing new digital technologies across their value chains and, by doing so, catalyzing significant organizational changes in operational processes and strategic approaches. This widespread evolution of businesses has prompted significant questions regarding the drivers of digital change, the necessary resources, and the capabilities that need to be developed or reconfigured. Our paper focuses on the role of intangible resources, such as a firm's social capital, and its specific implications for the broader research on this phenomenon. Consistent with the resource-based view, we examine the role of different types of social capital as critical resources in the digital transformation process while also considering the mediating role of the balancing act of the capabilities around business alignment and adaptation encompassed in the concept of ambidexterity. Furthermore, we introduce a contextual dimension to our study by examining family involvement in a firm as a significant factor influencing how businesses shape their digital goals and allocate resources toward digital transformation. Our paper addresses this under-explored research field by drawing on a large, cross-sectional dataset from an online panel study with 582 management-level participants from UK firms. After testing our hypotheses, our study's results indicate that bridging and bonding social capital resources significantly promote digital transformation by indirectly developing an ambidextrous orientation. Moreover, familial orientation strengthens both relationships. This research is currently one of the few studies providing empirical evidence on the relationship between digital transformation, its antecedents, and, specifically, the role of intangible resources.

How does market competition affect the reporting of sustainability practices? Insights from the UK and Germany

PurposeThis study tests the proprietary cost of reporting sustainability practices. It explores how market competition impacts the reporting of corporate sustainability information. Further, it examines whether the influence of market competition on sustainability reporting is affected by firm size.Design/methodology/approachIt uses two samples of the UK FTSE 350 and German Frankfurt CDAX nonfinancial firms from 2010 to 2023. The sustainability reporting scores for UK and German firms are their Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) disclosure scores based on the Bloomberg disclosure index. The Herfindahl–Hirschman index has been utilized to measure a firm’s degree of market competition.FindingsThe results reveal that reporting sustainability practices is a negative function of the degree of market competition. Specifically, companies in highly competitive industries disclose less information about their sustainability practices, suggesting that firms view sustainability reporting as a potential source of competitive disadvantage and, therefore, choose to limit such disclosures to maintain a strategic advantage over rivals. Further, the findings reveal a negative impact of market competition on sustainability reporting among small firms. However, this effect is weak or absent among medium and large firms. The results are more observable in the liberal market economy (i.e. the UK) than in the coordinated market economy (i.e. Germany).Practical implicationsIt provides implications for policymakers and market participants to advocate for more significant policies that promote transparency and encourage companies to report their sustainability practices and performance, especially companies in highly competitive industries.Originality/valueIt provides the first evidence of how market competition influences corporate sustainability reporting, adding a deeper insight into another non-financial dimension of sustainability reporting. Likewise, it reflects the varying priorities of companies of different sizes in managing both competition and sustainability reporting. Besides, it is the first to explore this nexus in two distinct jurisdictions: the UK and Germany.

Clarity in Crisis: How UK Firms Communicated Risks during COVID-19

This study explores the influence of risk disclosure levels and types on the readability of annual reports of non-financial firms in the UK during the COVID-19 outbreak. It further investigates how the disclosure of COVID-19-related information moderates the relationship between risk disclosure and readability. The study uses a content analysis approach and CFIE software to measure the level of risk disclosure and readability in the annual reports of non-financial firms listed on the FTSE all-share from 2019 to 2021. The results show a positive and significant effect of risk disclosure level on readability, which is stronger for firms that disclosed COVID-19 information. Different types of risk disclosure have varying effects on readability, with COVID-19 risk, credit risk, and strategic risk positively affecting readability, while operational risk negatively affects it. The study contributes to the literature on information asymmetry and institutional theory by demonstrating how risk disclosure and readability are influenced by external factors like the COVID-19 outbreak and internal factors such as firm characteristics and types of risks. It introduces a new risk definition and category specific to the COVID-19 pandemic and develops new measurements for risk disclosure, including credit, liquidity, market, operational, business, strategic, and COVID-19 risks. The study provides valuable insights for managers, investors, regulators, and standard setters on the relationship between risk disclosure and readability in annual reports. It highlights the importance of disclosing COVID-19-related information to enhance the readability and understandability of financial communication. The paper contributes to the literature and practice on risk disclosure, readability, and financial communication during crises.

Expanded auditor’s reports and voluntary disclosure

Employing a panel sample of 5,090 firm-years from 981 UK firms during the period from 2010 to 2016, we investigate the impact of the implementation of expanded auditor’s reports (EARs) on corporate voluntary disclosure. We find that the likelihood and frequency of voluntary disclosure significantly decrease after the implementation of EARs. In addition, the total number of risks of material misstatement (RMMs) has no impact on voluntary disclosure after the implementation of EARs, while certain RMMs categories (i.e., entity rather than account risks, and firm-specific rather than industry-level risks) display a more pronounced impact on corporate voluntary disclosure. In further analysis, we find that the mandatory adoption of EARs increases the proportion of long-term forecasts, riches the content of voluntary disclosure, and elicits a more positive market response to the announcement of voluntary disclosure. Cross-sectional analyses show that the impact of the implementation of EARs on voluntary disclosure can be magnified by a higher level of media coverage, especially breaking news coverage. Our results remain valid after considering various robustness tests and selection bias concerns

International operations and international influences – Investing in UK firms

We provide an alternative perspective on the benefits of investing in Multinational Companies (MNCs) using a unique hand-collected dataset on the location of UK firm's sales and subsidiaries from 1998 to 2015. We find that investors can gain diversification benefits from investing in MNCs, but not necessarily firms with the greatest global reach. We also show that firm's returns tend not to be influenced by the geographical regions where they report sales and subsidiaries. The results suggest a new category of firms that may be beneficial for diversification - firms that are significantly influenced by the stock markets of a geographical region but do not report sales or subsidiaries in that region. This implies that investors should analyse the geographical regions that influence firm returns rather than the location of their sales and subsidiaries. Intuitively, these should be the same, but our results show a difference between the geographical location of a firm's sales and subsidiaries, and the regions that influence the firm returns. We recommend that investors look beyond the location of MNC activities and investigate the geographical regions that influence firms' returns when creating portfolios.

Risk disclosure, earnings smoothing and firm perceived risk

Purpose This paper aims to examine the association between perceived firm risk and two reporting mechanisms: risk disclosure and earnings smoothing in the UK context. Design/methodology/approach This study juxtaposes three competing views, the “null”, the “divergence” and the “convergence” hypotheses, and empirically investigates whether risk disclosure and earnings smoothing affect firm perceived risk for a sample of large UK firms with rich and poor information environments. This study also uses the global financial crisis as an external shock on overall risk in the economy to investigate when and how managers use these two reporting mechanisms to shape the firm perceived risk. Findings This paper documents that risk disclosures have no significant effect on investors’ risk perceptions, consistent with risk disclosures containing boilerplate and generic statements about firm risk. This paper also finds that earnings smoothing reduces investors’ risk perceptions, reflecting investors’ interpretations about future firm performance. Additional tests reveal that earnings smoothing is not associated with perceived firm risk for firms with rich information environments and expanded risk disclosures. Furthermore, reporting smooth earnings decreases perceived firm risk following the global financial crisis. These findings are robust to alternative specifications and measures of earnings smoothing as well as post-filing perceived firm risk. Research limitations/implications This study does not distinguish between the garbling role and the informational role of earnings smoothing. The risk disclosure measurement used in this study, developed based on UK annual reports, may limit the generalizability of findings to other countries. Practical implications The findings suggest that managers should revise their risk disclosure strategies to provide in-depth details on firm risk. Investors might require information and thorough assessment to evaluate investment risks when firms provide generic risk disclosures and smoothed earnings by consulting sources like financial intermediaries. Regulators should keep an eye on firms reporting boilerplate risk disclosures and on how smoothing earnings impacts the firm perceived risk following economic turmoil, to guide interventions that promote market stability. Originality/value The findings provide new insights into when and how managers use their financial reporting discretion to make firms appear less risky and, therefore, influence investors’ risk perceptions.

Do firm expectations respond to monetary policy announcements?

This paper investigates whether UK firms’ price growth expectations respond to the Bank of England (BoE) monetary policy announcements and explores the underlying mechanism. Using microdata from the UK Decision Maker Panel survey, we isolate the exogenous component of the monetary policy decisions by comparing firms’ responses filed before and after BoE announcements. Guided by a model of dispersed information, our analysis suggests that firms respond to monetary policy announcements but are, overall, not as informed and sophisticated as financial market participants. Firms’ price expectations respond to actual interest rate changes, as well as to bank rate changes purged from their systematic component, but not to high-frequency surprises. The left tail of their expected price change distribution is particularly sensitive to monetary policy announcements. Furthermore, we unveil significant non-linear effects, with changes in interest rates of 50 basis points being mostly responsible for revisions in expectations. This implies that the recent tightening cycle was effective in shifting firms’ expectations primarily at its peak when a sequence of consecutive large rate hikes was implemented. We also show that UK news coverage of the BoE’s activities increases following policy rate changes, highlighting the media’s crucial role in shaping public expectations.

When is organisational resizing helpful or harmful for innovation outputs?

Research on the effect of changing staffing levels (i.e. resizing) on organisational innovation has generated mixed and often contradictory results. Recent research has attempted to reconcile such inconsistencies by showing that this effect on innovation depends on the firm’s staffing level prior to downsizing. Since firms seek to downsize as well as upsize their staffing levels, the effect of resizing (downsizing and upsizing) on innovation and the magnitude of such effect is still unknown. Using a longitudinal dataset of UK firms, we examine the effect of resizing on innovation outputs and its magnitude in resource-rich and resource-constrained firms. Our results suggest that upsizing in resource-constrained firms and downsizing in resource-rich firms is helpful for innovation, whereas upsizing in resource-rich and downsizing in resource-constrained firms have the reverse effect. Compared with resource-rich firms, the effect of resizing on innovation outputs is more pronounced in resource-constrained firms. These results have several practical managerial implications.

Beyond Compliance: How ESG Reporting Influences the Cost of Capital in UK Firms

This research examines the effect of ESG disclosure on the cost of capital for non-financial firms in the UK, indexed by the FTSE All-Share Index, during the period from 2014 to 2018. Using multivariate analysis with ordinary least squares (OLS), fixed effects, robust regression, and Tobit models, this research assesses the effect of ESG reporting, governance, and the cost of capital, including robustness checks using an alternative ESG indicator, the environmental pillar score. Contrary to expectations, ESG reporting is positively associated with the cost of capital. However, corporate governance moderates this relationship, weakening the positive correlation and reversing it to a negative association for firms with strong governance practices, consistent with the hypotheses. This research also finds that firm size, liquidity, profitability, and leverage, positively affect the cost of capital, while board size, independent board composition, audit committee independence, and auditor type do not significantly influence it. Notably, non-executive directors on the audit committee have a significant negative effect on the cost of capital. These findings are valuable for investors, companies, regulators, auditors, policymakers, and the academic and research community. Specifically, for investors, this study provides insights into how ESG disclosures can influence investment risks and returns, highlighting the importance of robust corporate governance. Companies can leverage these insights to enhance their governance practices and optimize their capital costs. Regulators and policymakers can use the findings to develop guidelines that encourage transparent ESG reporting and strong governance frameworks, thereby improving market stability and investor confidence. Auditors can utilize the results to better understand the effect of non-financial reporting on financial metrics, helping to provide more accurate audits and assessments. These findings inform investors, companies, regulators, auditors, and academia, in fostering a more sustainable and transparent financial environment.

Cash is queen? Impact of gender-diverse boards on firms' cash holdings during COVID-19

This study examines the role of gender-diverse boards in preserving cash holdings during crises. Using a sample of UK firms during the COVID-19 period, we find that firms with more female directors had higher cash holdings. This increase in cash reserves is primarily driven by reduced board compensation, reflecting the careful stewardship associated with gender-diverse boards. Interestingly, we find no evidence of female directors reducing acquisition activity or capital expenditures, suggesting that these firms did not compromise on growth prospects while building their cash buffer. Our study underscores the value of gender-diverse boards in navigating firms through crises without sacrificing shareholder value. Our results remain robust even after controlling for endogeneity and alternative estimation techniques. The findings hold significant implications for investors, policymakers, and advocates of gender diversity in boardrooms, emphasizing the financial prudence that gender diversity can bring in crisis management.

Recent trends in firm‐level total factor productivity in the UK: new measures, new puzzles

AbstractUnderstanding the poor productivity performance of the UK economy since the financial crisis is complicated by the well‐known challenges in estimating total factor productivity (TFP) using only revenue data. We develop a structural framework to infer quality‐adjusted TFP from an estimated firm‐level revenue function. We use microdata for two sectors previously identified as being significant contributors to the UK's productivity growth slowdown—manufacturing and ICT—from 2008 to 2019. The revenue function is estimated using the Blundell–Bond System GMM estimator. We also use an alternative cost‐shares approach to identifying and measuring TFP. For both methods, we find an overall fall in TFP levels in manufacturing and a rise in ICT. We find a striking decline of between 13% and 18% in the level of within‐firm manufacturing TFP, and of between 11% and 16% in ICT, although with reallocation effects differing between the two sectors. The finding of declining within‐firm TFP is robust, although the magnitude varies between methods. We discuss a possible explanation for this extended UK productivity puzzle based on the relative underperformance of UK firms in international markets.

The Digital Pound: A Plan Designed to Fail?

The UK authorities have consulted on the issue of the ‘digital pound’, a retail central bank digital currency (CBDC) for general use in payments by UK households and firms. The stated ambition is a new form of central bank money, used alongside Bank of England notes and commercial bank deposits. There are inherent contradictions in these plans. Promoting adoption requires that users should be able to freely and conveniently receive and send digital pound payments and that account services can compete effectively with commercial bank transaction accounts. Containing the risks of retail CBDC to financial stability requires doing the opposite: limiting the use of the digital pound and handicapping account providers in their competition with commercial banks. To resolve this contradiction, ambition should be scaled back, focusing on specific and narrow use cases that cannot be easily addressed using commercial bank transaction accounts.

Capitalised development costs and future cash flows: The effect of CEO overconfidence and board gender diversity

Capitalisation of development costs mandated under IAS 38 is an important accounting issue conveying a signal to users of accounting information regarding future economic benefits. Using a longitudinal sample of UK firms, firstly, we examine the adverse effect of CEO overconfidence levels on the association between capitalised development costs and future economic benefits, proxied by cash flows. Secondly, we examine the moderating influence of board gender diversity on this association. We find that the association between capitalised development costs and future cash flows, while positive, is significantly weaker for firms with higher levels of CEO overconfidence, implying that the signalling effect of capitalisation is diluted. Moreover, our results show that board gender diversity significantly moderates the managerial bias associated with high overconfidence levels, helping to restore the neutrality of accounting and the strength of signalling with regards to future economic benefits.

The Complementarity and Substitution Effects of CSR‐Focused Governance Mechanisms on CSR Decoupling

ABSTRACTResearch Question/IssueThe study examines whether CSR‐focused governance mechanisms (CSR committees, standalone CSR reports, and CSR contracting) operate as complements or substitutes for each other in mitigating CSR decoupling.Research Findings/InsightsThe study finds that CSR‐focused governance mechanisms diminish CSR decoupling and enhance CSR credibility in UK firms. In addition, the simultaneous presence of CSR committees and standalone CSR reports has a complementary effect in mitigating CSR decoupling. Conversely, the combinations of CSR committees and CSR contracting as well as standalone CSR reports and CSR contracting exhibit a substitute relationship. These impacts remain consistent when categorizing CSR decoupling into underreporting and overreporting. During the financial crisis of 2008–2009, the complementary relationship between CSR committees and CSR reports remained consistent, although the substitution between CSR committees and CSR contracting, and CSR reports and CSR contracting, is only observed after the crisis.Theoretical/Academic ImplicationsThe study innovatively contributes to the agency theory literature by adopting a bundle corporate governance approach while focusing on specific CSR governance mechanisms to address agency issues. It empirically shows that complementary combinations of CSR‐focused governance mechanisms signify a marginal benefit in reducing CSR decoupling, leading to a reduction in agency costs.Practitioner/Policy ImplicationsThe study offers several implications. First, it helps firms create ideal combinations of different CSR‐focused governance mechanisms that provide superior marginal benefits. Second, firms' stakeholders, especially the investors, could identify the usefulness of adopting CSR‐focused governance mechanisms in CSR reporting. Finally, it could also attract regulators' attention toward the weaker aspects of the existing corporate governance code regarding CSR.

Firm value and the use of financial derivatives: Evidence from developed countries

AbstractThis paper examines whether financial derivatives usage impacts firm value in seven developed countries from 2007 to 2016. We rely on textual analysis to identify derivatives users and address the potential reverse causality problem through propensity score matching and the difference‐in‐differences approach. Empirical findings suggest that the use of derivatives has a negative effect on firm value. Interestingly, we observe asymmetric valuation effects for specific countries when comparing firms that adopt derivatives with those that abandon them. US, UK, and Australian firms adopting derivatives experience a significant decrease in their valuation. Contrary to expectations, this adverse effect diminishes and may become insignificant at best when firms choose to abandon derivatives. Furthermore, most of the significant value effects disappear when using the industry relative valuation measure.

Too busy to balance? A longitudinal analysis of board of director busyness and firms’ ambidextrous orientation

Abstract Studies commonly highlight the informational upside of a board of directors’ connections to its external environment. Through their seats on multiple outside boards, directors are positioned to bring valuable informational resources to complex internal tasks on a focal firm. Crafting an ambidextrous strategic orientation is such a task, requiring great informational resourcing from a board to reconcile contradictions of exploration and exploitation. Yet, we assign an important boundary condition to this expectation by unpacking the idea of “busyness” as an important consideration in a board’s (in)ability to apply their informational resources. We complement Resource Dependence Theory with insights from bounded rationality and bounded reliability, to challenge the “more is better” assumption of the benefits of outside board seats. We develop corresponding hypotheses on the extent to which busyness of different director types (exemplified here via the busyness of non-executives, executives, and women directors) is related to the ambidextrous strategic orientation of a firm. Our results from a robust longitudinal panel analysis of publicly listed UK firms uncover complex patterns and provide evidence that boards with busy non-executives have a negative influence on the ambidextrous strategic orientation of firms, whereas boards with busy executive directors do not seem to exert an influence. We further find that boards with busy women directors show an inverted U-shaped relation with ambidextrous strategic orientation. We discuss implications for theory and practice.

Boardroom Diversity and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from the UK Firms

AbstractThis study provides comprehensive evidence on the link between boardroom diversity and reduction of carbon emissions. Analyzing data from a sample of 344 UK-listed non-financial and unregulated firms over the period from 2005 to 2021, our findings indicate that task-oriented (i.e., tenure) and structural (i.e., insider/outsider) board diversity are important for reducing corporate carbon emissions while relational diversity does not appear to be useful. Furthermore, the study explores the role of external carbon governance, such as the Paris Agreement, on firms with weaker internal governance structures. The findings reveal that external governance plays a critical role in curbing emissions when internal governance is not effective. Overall, our research offers valuable insights for management and regulatory bodies on the interplay between various governance mechanisms internal and external to a firm. This knowledge could guide them in determining the right mix and degree of diversity in the boardroom to achieve environmental goals.

The Impact of Boardroom Diversity on Company Performance Using Propensity Score-Based Estimators (PSM)

This study investigates the impact of boardroom diversity on firm performance utilizing propensity score- based estimators (PSM). Drawing from a comprehensive literature review, it is established that gender diversity in boardrooms positively influences firm performance, particularly in the financial sector. Using panel data from 503 UK firms over the period of 2015-2017, the analysis focuses on key performance indicators such as market capitalization and leverage. Employing various econometric models, including binary treatment and augmented inverse-probability weighting, the study reveals significant positive effects of female board- room participation on firm performance. Specifically, an increase in female representation is associated with higher market capitalization and an increased leverage ratio, indicating a propensity for riskier investments. Furthermore, the study explores the nuanced effects of different levels of female director representation, highlighting the importance of substantial gender diversity for optimal firm performance. Despite potential limitations such as treatment selection bias and omitted variable bias, the models demonstrate robustness and contribute to the existing literature by providing empirical evidence supporting the positive impact of boardroom diversity on company performance.

Signalling through managerial tone and analysts’ response

ABSTRACT This study investigates the interaction between a tone signaller and receiver through managerial tone on a conference call. Based on a signalling framework, we examine the following research questions: Does the signal (tone) match the latent information it intends to convey? Can a receiver (analyst) interpret the signal correctly and send feedback to confirm (or disconfirm) it? Does the signalling environment impact signalling effectiveness? Using a sample of 3680 transcripts of earnings conference calls from 241 UK firms in the FTSE 350 Index, we find that managerial tone can produce effective signals that match private information from managers. Analysts understand tone signals accurately and send confirmation feedback to managers. They revise their forecasts upward (downward) following more (less) optimistic managerial tones. They consistently confirm and respond to managers with a similar tone. Analysts with superior expertise, experience and ability better understand the tone signal, leading to a larger reduction in forecast error. The information environment can moderate signalling effectiveness. This shows that managerial tone represents a reliable signalling device for transmitting latent information on a firm’s quality and future performance and that receivers can understand this signal correctly. This study highlights the signalling role of managerial tone in managers and analysts’ communication. HIGHLIGHTS Managerial tone effectively communicates private information to analysts. Analysts accurately interpret tone signals and adjust forecasts accordingly. Analysts with superior expertise better understand tone, reducing forecast errors. Managerial tone's signalling effectiveness varies with information environment.

The source of heterogeneous externalities: evidence from foreign multinationals in the UK

ABSTRACT The relationship between inward investments and local firms’ productivity is contingent on several contextual conditions that collectively define the ability of firms and regions to recognise, assimilate and commercially apply external knowledge. Yet the empirical literature has been unable to account efficiently for such multidimensional sources of heterogeneous externalities. We introduce a novel two-stage empirical methodology that allows accounting for a wide range of moderating circumstances. Relying on a sample of 11,000 UK firms over the period 2012–2018, we show that while the nature of places affects the potential externalities from multinational enterprises (MNEs), what matters more are firm-level characteristics. This has important implications for regional policy, particularly in understanding the drivers of inequality, both within and across regions.