The realm of laparoscopic surgery has expanded from simple extirpative operations to more complicated reconstructive procedures, such as dismembered pyeloplasty and ileal conduit creation. There has been recent interest in using laparoscopic techniques to augment the bladder with bowel.1, 2 To date only 1 case of enterocystoplasty, using the stomach, has been accomplished entirely by laparoscopy.3 To our knowledge we report the first case of ileal enterocystoplasty performed completely by laparoscopy. CASE REPORT A 31-year-old paraplegic woman with a C6 spinal cord injury developed worsening voiding dysfunction during the 2 years preceding presentation. She had managed previously with clean intermittent catheterization every 4 hours and remained dry. Video urodynamic studies demonstrated detrusor instability at bladder volumes of 40 to 50 ml. and a maximum bladder capacity of 85 ml. The patient did not desire urinary diversion or a continent cutaneous reservoir, and opted instead for laparoscopic ileal bladder augmentation. Mechanical and antibiotic bowel preparation was performed, and externalized ureteral stents were initially placed. The remainder of the operation duplicated open augmentation cystoplasty using an ileal segment. Briefly, 5 ports were used and the ileum was identified 15 cm. from the ileocecal valve. An endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis stapler was used to isolate a 15 to 20 cm. segment of ileum, and the mesentery was incised with ultrasonic coagulating shears. Bowel continuity was restored in a side-to-side fashion using a gastrointestinal anastomosis stapler, with the enterotomy closed in a single layer with interrupted 2-zero silk Lembert sutures. Monopolar electrocautery was used to remove the staples from both ends of the isolated ileal segment and detubularize it on its antimesenteric border. The ileum was sutured into a U-shaped configuration using a single layer of running 3-zero polyglactin sutures prior to mid sagittal cystotomy. The ileal patch was sutured to the bladder in quadrants using running 3-zero polyglactin sutures. Drainage was provided by a 20Fr urethral catheter and a 10 mm. Blake drain brought out through a lateral port site. No suprapubic catheter was placed. Watertight closure was confirmed by intraoperative irrigation of the bladder. Estimated blood loss was 100 ml. and there were no intraoperative complications. On the third postoperative day the drain was removed and the patient resumed liquid intake. However, she remained hospitalized due to prolonged ileus for 13 days. She returned to work and normal activity 1 week after being discharged. A cystogram performed 4 weeks postoperatively, at the time of catheter removal, demonstrated a bladder capacity of at least 250 ml. (see figure). Presently, the patient is continent between catheterizations with urinary volumes approximating 400 ml. DISCUSSION