Combination Of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Research Articles

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance in de novo BCR::ABL1–positive BCP-ALL beyond kinase domain mutations

AbstractA better understanding of ABL1 kinase domain mutation–independent causes of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance is needed for BCR::ABL1–positive B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). Although TKIs have dramatically improved outcomes, a subset of patients still experiences relapsed or refractory disease. We aimed to identify potential biomarkers of intrinsic TKI resistance at diagnosis in samples from 32 pediatric and 19 adult patients with BCR::ABL1–positive BCP-ALL. Reduced ex vivo imatinib sensitivity was observed in cells derived from newly diagnosed patients who relapsed after combined TKI and chemotherapy treatment compared with cells derived from patients who remained in continuous complete remission. We observed that ex vivo imatinib resistance was inversely correlated with the amount of (phosphorylated) BCR::ABL1/ABL1 protein present in samples that were taken at diagnosis without prior TKI exposure. This suggests an intrinsic cause of TKI resistance that is independent of functional BCR::ABL1 signaling. Simultaneous deletions of IKZF1 and CDKN2A/B and/or PAX5 (IKZF1plus), as well as deletions of PAX5 alone, were related to ex vivo imatinib resistance. In addition, somatic lesions involving ZEB2, SETD2, SH2B3, and CRLF2 were associated with reduced ex vivo imatinib sensitivity. Our data suggest that the poor prognostic value of IKZF1(plus) deletions is linked to intrinsic mechanisms of TKI resistance other than ABL1 kinase domain mutations in newly diagnosed pediatric and adult BCR::ABL1–positive BCP-ALL.

Design of balanced dual-target inhibitors of EGFR and microtubule

Motivated by the clinical success of combining tyrosine kinase inhibitors with microtubule-targeted drugs in antitumor treatment, this paper presents a novel combi-targeting design for dual-target inhibitors, featuring arylformylurea-coupled quinazoline backbones. A series of target compounds (10a-10r) were designed, synthesized, and characterized. Biological assessments demonstrated that 10c notably potentiated ten tumor cell lines in vitro, with IC50 values ranging from 1.04 µM to 7.66 µM. Importantly, 10c (IC50 = 10.66 nM) exhibited superior inhibitory activity against EGFR kinases compared to the reference drug Gefitinib (25.42 nM) and reduced phosphorylated levels of EGFR, AKT, and ERK. Moreover, 10c significantly impeded tubulin polymerization, disrupted the intracellular microtubule network in A549 cells, induced apoptosis, led to S-phase cell cycle arrest, and hindered cell migration. In anticancer evaluation tests using A549 cancer-bearing nude mice models, 10c showed a therapeutic effect similar to Gefitinib, but required only half the dosage (15 mg/kg). These findings indicate that compound 10c is a promising dual-target candidate for anticancer therapy.

Efficacy and safety of regorafenib in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy as second-line and third-line regimen for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study.

Despite the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there is an unmet need regarding subsequent treatments in patients that fail ICI. Regorafenib is a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitor, which could increase programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in tumors and increase intra-tumoral CD8+ T-cell infiltration by normalizing the cancer vasculature and improving the efficacy of the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody. Thus, we evaluated the combination of regorafenib and a PD-1 inhibitor for advanced HCC patients that had failed combined tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) plus ICI. Data of patients with advanced HCC who had failed combined TKIs plus ICI treatment and were afterwards treated with combined regorafenib plus a PD-1 inhibitor were reviewed. All patients had received PD-1 inhibitors as part of the first-line treatment and regorafenib every 4 weeks until disease progression, intolerable toxicities, or physician/patient withdrawal. The clinical data, previous treatment strategies, follow-up imaging results, and adverse events (AEs) during follow-ups were recorded. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v. 5.0 was used to evaluate AEs and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v. 1.1 was used to evaluate response. The primary endpoint was safety, and the secondary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and duration of response (DOR). From November 15, 2020, to January 31, 2022, data of 17 patients with advanced HCC that met the criteria were reviewed. The cohort included 16 men and 1 woman with a median age of 54 years (interquartile range, 46 to 63 years). Sixteen patients had Child-Pugh class A (n=16, 94.12%) and one with class B (n=1, 15.9%) liver disease. Thirteen patients received second-line treatment, and the remaining patients received third-line treatment. All patients received at least 1 dose of PD-1 inhibitors. The median follow-up duration was 7.62 months. Twelve recipients experienced treatment-related AEs. The most frequent AE (≥5%) included fatigue (17.64%), diarrhea (17.65%), proteinuria (5.88%), bleeding gums (11.76%), and hypertension (11.76%). No grade-4 AE or new safety signals were identified. The ORR and DCR were 41.2% and 64.7%, respectively, and the median PFS was 5.09 months. Regorafenib combined with PD-1 inhibitor is a promising regimen in treating patients with advanced HCC owing to its safety and effectiveness as well as low incidence of serious AEs with its use.

Phase 2 Study of Dasatinib with and without Venetoclax in Patients with Early Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (ECP-CML)

Background Treatment-free remission (TFR) is a therapeutic goal for patients with ECP-CML once patients maintain a deep molecular remission (DMR) on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Only a fraction of patients (pts) achieved sustained (3+ years) molecular remission with 4.0- to 4.5-log reduction (MR4.5). Preclinical studies showed that BCL-2 is a key survival factor for CML stem/progenitor cells. Therefore, the combination of TKIs and venetoclax, targeting BCR::ABL1 and BCL-2, has the potential to significantly improve DMR and subsequently the rates of TFR. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination. Methods Patients with ECP-CML or accelerated phase (AP; defined by clonal evolution only) were eligible; pts with < 1 month of prior TKI therapy were eligible. Pts received single-agent dasatinib 50 mg/d for the first 3 months. From Month 4 and onwards, venetoclax was administered from Days 1 to 14 each month concomitantly with dasatinib for a total of 3 years. The first 16 patients received venetoclax 200 mg/d, with a rapid ramp-up starting 50 mg on Day 1, then 100 mg on Day 2, then 200 mg daily on Day 3 and onwards. Due to neutropenia observed with continuous dose of venetoclax 200 mg/d, the protocol was ameded: from patient #17 and onwards, venetoclax was administered at 200 mg/d for 14 days per month and upon achievement of MR4.5, venetoclax was reduced to 100 mg/d for 7 days per month. After 3 years of combination, patients received single-agent dasatinib. TFR was offered after ≥ 3 years of DMR. The primary endpoint was the rate of major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months of the combination. The secondary endpoints were the 12-month rate of MR4.5 and the cumulative overall rate of MR4.5; the rates of MR4.5 at 6-, 12-, 18-, 24, and 36-months of the combination; the proportion of patients with sustained MR4.5 of 3 years and more; the TFR rate; overall survival; and the safety of the combination. Cumulative response rates were calculated with treatment failure as a competing event. Failure-free survival (FFS) was calculated from the initiation of therapy to loss of major cytogenetic response (MCyR), transformation to AP or blast phase, discontinuation of therapy for any reason except of TFR, or death. Results Sixty-five pts were enrolled and treated between April 2018 and August 2021. The median age at treatment initation was 46 years (range, 23-73) and 57% of the pts were females. Twenty-one (32%) pts had splenomegaly, 46 (71%) had low Sokal risk disease and 3 (5%) had high Sokal risk disease (Table 1). By 12 months of the combination, 85% of the pts had achieved MMR or deeper response. The median time to MMR, MR4, and MR4.5 were 6.2 months, 13 months, and 23.9 months from the time of TKI start, respectively. After a median follow-up of 25.7 months (range, 8.7-48.1), two pts discontinued therapy due to adverse events (GI intolerance, and pleural effusion); the 2 -year FFS was 96%. One pt switched TKI therapy due to the lack of 18-month complete cytogenetic response (CCyR); no loss of CCyR, transformation, or death was observed. We then compared the outcomes with the combination to the outcomes of 85 pts treated with single-agent dasatinib. From the start of TKI therapy, the 12-month cumulative MMR rates were 78% and 79% in the dasatinib single-agent and dasatinib + venetoclax groups, respectively. The cumulative 24-month rates of CCyR, MMR, MR4, and MR4.5 are summarized in Table 2. In the dasatinib single-agent group, 3 pts switched TKI therapy due to the lack of 12-month MCyR, 18-month CCyR, and the acquisition of ABL1 mutation (1 each); 3 pts switched TKI therapy due to loss of CCyR; 2 pts died during therapy (deaths unrelated to CML). Within one year of therapy, the incidence of grade 1/2 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count, below lower range of normal to 1,000 x10 9/L) was 21% and 52% in the dasatinib single agent and dasatinib + venetoclax groups, respectively ( P<0.001); the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count, below 1,000 x10 9/L) was 8% and 17%, respectively ( P<0.001). There was no incidence of neutropenic fever in the dasatinib + venetoclax. Conclusion The combination of dasatinib 50 mg/d and venetoclax is safe and effective in pts with ECP-CML. With a median follow-up of 2 years, the cumulative resposne of dasatinib + venetoclax is similar to that of dasatinib single-agent without adding significant toxicities. Further follow-up is needed for the evaluation of TFR.

Achievement of Undetectable BCR::ABL1 (uBCR::ABL1) Is Predictive of Improved Survival in Philadelphia Chromosome Positive (Ph+ve) Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Patients Not Receiving Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Background With the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based therapy the outcome of Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph +) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has significantly improved. Moreover, patients (pts) who achieved undetectable (u) BCR::ABL1 at 3 months (mo) from the time of initiating therapy, tend to have improved outcomes (Short et al. Blood 2016; 128 [4];504-507). We conducted a retrospective multicenter study to analyze the predictors of achieving uBCR::ABL1 in adult (> 18 years) Ph + ALL pts. Methods A total of 458 adult Ph + ALL pts from 10 US academic institutions, who were diagnosed between May 2003 and April 2023, were evaluated to assess the rates of uBCR::ABL1 at 3 mo after initiating therapy and factors that predict the achievement of molecular response. Continuous variables were summarized as median (range), while categorical variables were reported as frequency (percentage). Unadjusted comparisons of patient/ treatment related characteristics and molecular response were made using a non-parametric test (continuous variables) or Fisher's exact test (categorical variables). Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between molecular responses via the log-rank test. Results Baseline characteristics The median age of the pts was 53 years (range [R] 19-85), median white blood cell count (WBC) was 17.6 (10 9/L) (R, 1.2-571), 249 (55%) pts had additional cytogenetic (CG) abnormalities, 98 (22%) pts had p210 fusion protein, and 35 (8%) pts had CNS disease at diagnosis. A higher proportion of pts received TKI in combination with intensive chemotherapy (IC) (69%), than TKI + steroids (15%), TKI + low intensity chemotherapy (LC; combination of vincristine, steroids +/- rituximab) (9%), TKI + blinatumomab (3%) and IC without TKI (4%) during induction. During induction, the highest proportion of pts received 2 nd generation TKI combinations (67%; majority dasatinib 98%), compared to imatinib (19%) or ponatinib (10%): 4% of pts did not receive TKI with induction. The complete remission (CR) rate was 94%; measurable residual disease (MRD) negative by flow cytometry 51% (181/352 evaluable pts) and 58.5% (209/354 evaluable pts) of pts had uBCR::ABL1 by PCR at 3 mo from induction. A total of 212 (46%) pts received allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in CR1, among them 61% of pts received TKI maintenance post allo-HCT. Predictors of uBCR::ABL1 at 3 months Predictors for uBCR::ABL1 at 3 mo are summarized in Table 1. The proportion of pts with WBC > 100 (45% vs 60%, p= 0.04), p210 fusion protein (35% vs 85%, p= <0.001), additional CG abnormality with monosomy 7 (40% vs 61%, p= 0.03), additional somatic myeloid co-mutation (39% vs 61%, p= 0.09; 94 pts evaluable), received induction with steroid plus TKI (41% vs 63%, p= 0.002) or received imatinib based induction (47% vs 61%,p= 0.07) had inferior uBCR::ABL1 rates at 3 mo. Conversely pts who received ponatinib based induction had significantly better uBCR::ABL1 rates (79% vs 57%, p= 0.009). Survival The median relapse free survival (RFS) was 72.3 mo (95% CI; 50.1-94.4), RFS was numerically higher among pts who achieved uBCR::ABL1 at 3 mo but not statistically significant (84.2 mo vs 62.9 mo, p= 0.20). The median overall survival (OS) was 129.2 mo (95% CI; 81.2-177.2), OS was not significantly different among pts who achieved uBCR::ABL1 at 3 mo (129.2) versus no uBCR::ABL1 (not reached; 50% alive at 94 mo), p= 0.47. In sub-set analysis, among non-transplanted pts, RFS was not statistically significant between those who achieved uBCR::ABL1 vs those who did not (38.9 vs 22.0 mo, respectively p= 0.24). However, the median OS was significantly higher in pts who achieved uBCR::ABL1 at 3 mo compared to pts who did not achieve uBCR::ABL1 at 3 mo: 149.3 vs 77.5 mo, p= 0.04 ( Figure 1). Conclusion In this large multicenter study, we observed significantly inferior uBCR::ABL1 rates among pts with WBC > 100, p210 fusion protein, monosomy 7 CG abnormality, pts receiving induction with steroid plus TKI or imatinib based induction. Conversely, uBCR::ABL1 rates were significantly better in pts receiving ponatinib based induction therapy. Overall, we did not see significant impact of uBCR::ABL1 at 3 mo, on RFS or OS. It is likely subsequent therapies and allo-HCT abrogates the negative impact of not achieving uBCR::ABL1 at 3 mo. However, among non-transplanted pts achievement of uBCR::ABL1 at 3 mo showed a significantly improved OS.

Low-Intensity and Chemo-Free Treatments in Ph+ ALL: Progression-Free Survival Based on Indirect Comparisons.

In Philadelphia chromosome-positive B-cell (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (LLA), growing evidence has accumulated regarding the efficacy of low-intensity and chemo-free regimens. Our objective was to analyze all recent trials evaluating these treatments and to compare them in terms of efficacy. We applied the Shiny method, an artificial intelligence technique, to analyze Kaplan-Meier curves and reconstruct patient-level data. Reconstructed patient data were then evaluated through standard survival statistics and subjected to indirect head-to-head treatment comparisons. The endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Based on 432 reconstructed patients, eight trials were analyzed. The survival data from these trials were pooled into three types of treatments: (i) treatments based on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) combined with reduced-intensity chemotherapy (denoted as TKICHE); (ii) TKIs associated with steroids with no chemotherapy (TKISTE); (iii) chemotherapy-free combinations of blinatumomab plus TKIs (TKIBLI). According to the Shiny method, the three PFS curves were reported in a single Kaplan-Meier graph and subjected to survival statistics. In terms of PFS, TKIBLI ranked first, TKICHE second, and TKISTE third; the differences between these three regimens were statistically significant. This multi-treatment Kaplan-Meier graph, generated through the Shiny method, summarized the current evidence on these treatments in both qualitative and quantitative terms.

Adult Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia: Strategies for Selection of Consolidation Therapy

The 2 primary treatment options for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are pediatric-inspired Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster protocols and the hyper-CVAD (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone) regimen—these treatment strategies are now being augmented with novel agents. Current strategies also emphasize measurable residual disease (MRD) quantification as a critical tool for determining the treatment course. For patients with MRD-positive ALL, the standard of care has shifted toward blinatumomab, resulting in improved outcomes and survival rates. Another novel agent, inotuzumab ozogamicin, is also being explored for the treatment of earlier stages of disease in patients with ALL. For Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)–negative ALL, the NCCN Guidelines recommend treatment with blinatumomab followed by allogeneic transplants for patients remaining MRD-positive after initial therapy. For patients achieving MRD negativity at the level of 10-4, blinatumomab is now recommended as consolidation, with or without subsequent allotransplant, depending on patient disease risk features. For Ph-positive ALL, the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in combination with blinatumomab has demonstrated excellent efficacy, indicating the growing importance of combination targeted therapies to improve outcomes and decrease the toxicity of therapy in adults with ALL.

Transient TKI-resistant CD44+pBAD+ blasts undergo intrinsic homeostatic adaptation to promote the survival of acute myeloid leukemia in vitro.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients have frequent mutations in FMS-like receptor tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3-mut AML), who respond poorly to salvage chemotherapies and targeted therapies such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Disease relapse is a common reason of treatment failures in FLT3-mut AML patients, but its intracellular refractory mechanism remains to be discovered. In this study, we designed serial in vitro time-course studies to investigate the biomarkers of TKI-resistant blasts and their survival mechanism. First, we found that a group of transient TKI-resistant blasts were CD44+Phosphorylated-BAD (pBAD)+ and that they could initiate the regrowth of blast clusters in vitro. Notably, TKI-treatments upregulated the compensation pathways to promote PIM2/3-mediated phosphorylation of BAD to initiate the blast survival. Next, we discovered a novel process of intracellular adaptive responses in these transient TKI-resistant blasts, including upregulated JAK/STAT signaling pathways for PIM2/3 expressions and activated SOCS1/SOCS3/PIAS2 inhibitory pathways to down-regulate redundant signal transduction and kinase phosphorylation to regain intracellular homeostasis. Finally, we found that the combination of TKIs with TYK2/STAT4 pathways-driven inhibitors could effectively treat FLT3-mut AML in vitro. In summary, our findings reveal that TKI-treatment can activate a JAK/STAT-PIM2/3 axis-mediated signaling pathways to promote the survival of CD44+pBAD+blasts in vitro. Disrupting these TKIs-activated redundant pathways and blast homeostasis could be a novel therapeutic strategy to treat FLT3-mut AML and prevent disease relapse in vivo.

Accomplices in Cure: Blinatumomab + Dasatinib Reduces TCR Signaling and Effector Function Stronger Than Ponatinib and Ameliorates T-Cell Exhaustion

The tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) dasatinib (dasa) and ponatinib (pona) are being tested in clinical trials in philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph +) B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) patients in combination with the CD19xCD3 bispecific blinatumomab (blina). Pona but not dasa is able to bind the BCR-ABL T315I mutation, which frequently occurs in BCP-ALL patients. Therefore, clinical studies are moving away from dasa and favor pona. Nevertheless, both TKIs in combination with blina have led to striking remission rates in Ph + BCP-ALL (complete response dasa: 98%, Foá 2020; pona: 92%, Jabbour 2023). Interestingly, increased lymphocyte frequencies were reported in patients under blina + dasa therapy (Puzzolo 2021), indicating that the effect of dasa is not limited to toxicity towards ALL cells conferred by BCR-ABL inhibition. Indeed, dasa modulates T-cell function by interfering with TCR signaling (Mestermann 2019). Also, we have shown that resting of T cells by high-dose dasa treatment ameliorates bispecific-induced T-cell exhaustion (Philipp 2022). In contrast, less is known about the effect of pona on T-cell function. Based on these data, we hypothesize that TKIs fine-tune TCR signaling, which ameliorates T-cell exhaustion during continuous blina infusion. Here, we systematically compared the influence of dasa and pona on blina-mediated TCR signaling and T-cell function. Inhibition of T-cell activation and function by dasa or pona at 0.3 - 100 nM was tested in vitro over 3 days: (1) CD69 expression, (2) blina-mediated killing as specific lysis of CD19 + tumor cells (3) T-cell expansion analyzed by dye dilution or CD2+ fold change (FC), (4) cytokine secretion measured by cytokine catch or cytometric bead array. Inhibition of TCR signaling was evaluated using a Jurkat-NFAT T-cell line stimulated for 6h with blina and CD19 + tumor cells. Phosphoflow of pAKT and pZAP70 was performed on CD3/CD28 activated primary human T cells. Toxicity of the TKIs against BCR-ABL +/- cell lines was evaluated after 3 days. T-cell exhaustion upon continuous blina + dasa stimulation was assessed in an in vitro long-term culture system for continuous bispecific exposure (Philipp 2022). Functional assays as described in (1)-(4) were performed every 7 days with isolated T cells from long-term cultures. Both TKIs inhibited T-cell function in a dose-dependent manner. Surprisingly, dasa was more potent than pona at low-intermediate doses in reducing T-cell function, shown by CD69 expression (mean % at TKI = 3 nM: basal = 70, dasa = 25, pona = 64, p<0.0001), cytotoxic function (mean % specific lysis at TKI = 12.5 nM: basal = 55, dasa = 0, pona = 54, p<0.0001), T-cell proliferation (mean % proliferated at TKI = 1.5 nM: basal = 62, dasa = 25, pona = 51, p<0.0001), as well as IFN secretion (normalized mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) at TKI = 12.5 nM: basal = 655, dasa = 0, pona = 924, p<0.0001). We also observed that NFAT engagement was significantly lower in dasa-treated Jurkat-NFAT cells (relative luminescence units at TKI 12.5 nM: basal = 1620, dasa = 392, pona = 996, p<0.001). Similarly, phosphoflow analyses revealed lower levels of pAKT and pZAP70 upon CD3/CD28 + dasa versus pona treatment (MFI of pAKT at TKI = 25 nM: basal = 2347, dasa = 1642, pona = 2045). Importantly, both TKIs induced cell death of BCR-ABL + but not BCR-ABL - cell lines at concentrations >3 nM. Interestingly, 14 days continuously stimulated T cells with blina + dasa (12.5 nM) did not lead to co-expression of inhibitory checkpoints (mean % of PD-1 +Tim-3 +LAG-3 + T cells on day 14: blina = 31, +dasa = 0.6, p<0.01). Furthermore, when isolated from long-term cultures and tested in functional assays, blina + dasa treated T cells maintained high cytokine secretion (mean IL-2 in pg/ml on day 14: blina = 730, blina + dasa = 5638, p<0.01), granzyme B expression (mean MFI ratio of CD8 + on day 14: blina = 96, blina + dasa = 335, p<0.01) and cytotoxic activity (mean % specific lysis on day 14: blina = 61, blina + dasa = 80). Together, these findings indicate that while both TKIs confer comparable toxicity to BCR-ABL + leukemia cells, dasa dampens TCR signaling and T-cell effector function more potently than pona. Strikingly, dasa can ameliorate T-cell exhaustion upon continuous blina exposure. Our data suggest that low-dose TKIs can fine-tune T-cell activity and might play a considerable role for the clinical success of combinatorial bispecific and TKI therapy in Ph + BCP-ALL.

Blinatumomab with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor for Ph-Positive B-Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL): Multicenter Retrospective Review

Background: Ph-positive B-ALL has long been considered an adverse cytogenetic abnormality in ALL, and it is generally recommended to proceed with a stem cell transplant (SCT) in first remission. Historically, the addition of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKI) to the stander chemotherapy backbone improved long-term survival, with better results noted in the second-generation than in first-generation TKIs. Recent reports on a non-chemotherapy-based approach with the combination of immunotherapy (Blinatumomab) and TKI showed encouraging results and potentially eliminated the need for consolidative SCT (Foà NEJM 2020, Jabbour Lancet Haematol 2023). In this retrospective analysis, we reviewed all Ph-positive B-ALL treated with blinatumomab and TKI at two major academic centers. Methods: A retrospective review of adolescents and adults (14 years or older) with Ph-positive B-ALL patients who received blinatumomab with TKI at two major institutions (KFSHRC & KFMC) between 7/2018 and 7/2023. Patients who received up to 3 cycles of chemotherapy before being transitioned to therapy with blinatumomab and TKI were considered as frontline if there was no history of relapsed disease. Relapse/refractory patients with Ph-positive B-ALL treated with blinatumomab and TKI were also included in the R/R cohort, excluding patients with prior single-agent exposure to blinatumomab or ponatinib. Patients with a history of CNS disease were included. Chronic myeloid leukemia in a lymphoid blast phase (LBP-CML) treated with blinatumomab and TKI were also included. Patients were assessed for toxicity as well as for efficacy. Results: We identified 17 patients, with a median age of 40 yrs (range, 15-78): 9 pts (53%) were frontline Ph-positive B-ALL, 5 (29%) pts were relapsed/refractory Ph-positive B-ALL, and 3 (18%) were LBP-CML patients. Pt characteristics and outcomes by cohort are outlined in Table. All patients in all the cohorts achieved complete remission and were included in the RFS analysis [ Figure]. Of 7 evaluable pts in the frontline cohort, all patients achieved complete molecular response (CMR) using PCR for BCR::ABL (CMR=100%). No relapse was documented, with a median follow-up of 6.9 months. In the relapse/refractory cohort, all patients achieved complete molecular response (CMR) using PCR for BCR::ABL (CMR=100%). No relapse was documented, with a median follow-up of 6.7 months. In 3 patients with LBP-CML, two patients achieved complete molecular response (CMR) using PCR for BCR::ABL, and one patient achieved MMR (0.036%). No relapse was documented, with a median follow-up of 19.7 months. Only four patients proceeded to SCT, two with LBP-CML and two with newly diagnosed Ph-positive B-ALL. All patients proceeded with SCT in CMR except one with LBP-CML with positive PCR for BCR::ABL at 0.03%, although with undetectable MRD by flow cytometry (<0.01%). Patients were treated with dasatinib (4 patients) and ponatinib (13 patients). The median number of blinatumomab cycles was 4 (1-5). One death occurred at seven months in a patient treated with dasatinib and blinatumomab. The patient presented to the emergency department with pleural effusion and cardiac tamponade and died during her ICU stay with infectious complication. The death is likely contributed to by dasatinib. Conclusion: Although with short follow-up, combining TKI with blinatumomab seems to have a high complete molecular response rate in patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory Ph-positive B-ALL. Similar to prior reports, patients with newly diagnosed Ph-positive B-ALL perhaps they could be spared the toxicities associated with chemotherapy and the need for allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in the first remission using this approach. Further evaluation of this novel strategy is warranted.

SHP2 Inhibition Overcomes Adaptive and Acquired Resistance to FLT3 TKI to Improve Efficacy Against FLT3/ITD AML

FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3) is a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) that is frequently mutated in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), with the internal tandem mutation (FLT3/ITD) conferring a poor prognosis to AML patients. This makes FLT3/ITD AML a validated target for treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), but their success has been hindered by mechanisms of resistance including rapid signal reprogramming known as adaptive resistance and acquired resistance gained through long-term treatment. Past work from our lab has shown that FLT3/ITD cells undergo adaptive resistance, through the rapid reactivation of ERK signaling within 24 hours of sustained FLT3 inhibition. To improve therapy of FLT3/ITD AML it is important to identify therapeutic targets that overcome this ERK reactivation. Since adaptive ERK reactivation is often due to the relief of negative feedback loops that result in the activation of other RTK, we performed an RTK phospho-array on the FLT3/ITD cell line MV4;11. 48-hour treatment with the FLT3 TKI sorafenib resulted in increased activation of IGF-R, HER3 and AXL. While recent work from our lab found that combining AXL and FLT3 inhibition abrogated the ERK reactivation and exerted greater antileukemic effects, the activation of multiple RTKs suggests that targeting a signaling hub that inhibits multiple RTKs at once will likely prove more efficacious in overcoming this adaptive response. Recent literature has implicated SH2-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase 2 (SHP2) as a therapeutic target in adaptive ERK reactivation in other cancers. SHP2 acts directly downstream of RTKs and is involved in the activation of the ERK pathway. Therefore, we explored whether the addition of an SHP2 inhibitorto FLT3 TKI can overcome the adaptive response and increase treatment efficacy. To explore this possibility, we first treated the FLT3/ITD cell lines Molm14 and MV4;11 as well as FLT3/ITD patient samples with FLT3 TKI alone or in combination with an SHP2 inhibitor for 24 hours. The addition of SHP099 to sorafenib decreased the expected ERK reactivation in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, combination treatment with synergized to decrease proliferation and increase apoptosis in the FLT3/ITD cell lines. Impressively, in a long-term assay, treatment with the combination for just 72 hours greatly reduced leukemic cell recovery. To determine whether this combination would improve efficacy in vivo, we engrafted NSG mice with Molm14 cells and treated them for 4 weeks via oral gavage. The combination of SHP099 with gilteritinib group resulted in a statistically significantly lower leukemia burden compared to either treatment alone and the vehicle control. The combination group also had prolonged survival compared to the other groups. In addition to rapid adaptive resistance, there are mechanisms of acquired resistance that render traditional FLT3 TKI treatments ineffective against FLT3/ITD AML cells. We next examined the effects of SHP2 inhibition on FLT3-TKI resistant cells models that were generated by growing and maintaining Molm14 and MV4;11 cells in the presence of FLT3 TKI. The combination of FLT3 TKI and SHP099 resensitized the cells to FLT3 TKI, resulting in decreased ERK phosphorylation, decreased proliferation and increased apoptosis of these FLT3 TKI resistant cells. We also explored the effects of treating the FLT3/ITD mutant cell lines with the combination of SHP099 and several of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agents typically used in the treatment of AML including cytarabine and daunorubicin. While daunorubicin or cytarabine alone had little effect on the level of phosphorylated ERK, the addition of SHP099 decreased ERK activation and the combination synergized to exert greater to decrease proliferation and increase apoptosis. These studies reveal that combining FLT3 TKI treatment with an allosteric SHP2 inhibitor decreases the adaptive ERK reactivation observed in FLT3/ITD cells. The finding that SHP099 synergized with both FLT3 TKI and chemotherapy agents in different FLT3-mutated AML models speaks to the versatile efficacy of SHP2 inhibition in multiple AML models. Taken together, the data suggests that SHP2 inhibition can help overcome both adaptive and acquired resistance in FLT3/ITD AML and is a candidate to try to improve patient outcomes.

Possibilities of combined PET/CT with 18F-FDG in evaluating the effectiveness of targeted therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction. Early assessment of the effect of targeted therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a mutation in the EGFR gene is important for the timely correction of antitumor therapy.Aim: To study the possibilities of combined positron emission and computed tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (PET/ CT with 18F-FDG) using the RECIST 1.1 and PERCIST 1.0 criteria. In a comparative assessment of the effect of various targeted therapy options in patients with NSCLC and a mutation in the EGFR gene.Material and Methods. The study included 86 patients with stage II-IV NSCLC, including 56 patients with a mutation in the EGFR gene. Of these, 32 patients received targeted monotherapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) – gefitinib or erlotinib and 24 patients received combination therapy (TKI + bevacizumab). The control group consisted of 30 patients who received platinum-containing chemotherapy drugs in combination with bevacizumab. The effect of antitumor therapy was evaluated using the combined PET method/CT with 18F-FDG using RECIST 1.1 and PERCIST 1.0 criteria. The results of the study were compared before the start of treatment and after 4-6 weeks of treatment.Results. In the repeated study of PET/CT with 18F-FDG, a partial positive response to the treatment of both tumor foci and affected regional lymph nodes according to the metabolic criteria PERCIST 1.0. was observed 1.3–1.8 times more often than when using the anatomical criteria RECIST 1.1. (p = 0,049). The frequency of а positive response to treatment in patients receiving targeted monotherapy was quite comparable to that in patients in the control group (43.7 and 40.0%, respectively). Based on 18F-FDG repeat PET/CT and PERCIST 1.0 metabolic criteria in patients receiving combined targeted therapy, a partial positive effect of treatment (58.3%) was observed 1.4 times more often, and disease progression was 4 times less common than in the subgroup of targeted monotherapy and in the control group (p = 0,043).Conclusions. Possibilities of early assessment of the effect of antitumor therapy using PET/CT with 18F-FDG increase when using the metabolic criteria PERCIST 1.0 – more sensitive than the anatomical criteria RECIST 1.1. According to PET/CT with 18F-FDG in patients with NSCLC and a mutation in the EGFR gene, the effect of combined therapy of TKI in combination with bevacizumab significantly exceeds not only the result of targeted monotherapy, but also the effect of chemotherapeutic treatment of patients in the control group.

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

BackgroundNearly 30% of new renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cases are diagnosed at an advanced or metastatic stage. Recent approvals of immunotherapies (IO) have significantly impacted patient care, but real-world outcomes of these treatments have not been widely evaluated. MethodsEligible physicians abstracted demographic and clinical data from patient medical records for patients with advanced clear and non-clear cell RCC (aRCC) who initiated treatment between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. A multivariate Cox regression model was developed to assess the impact of treatment category on clinical outcomes while controlling for International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk category, histology, and other patient characteristics. ResultsA total of 498 patients were included (201 from US, 62 from Canada, 58 from UK, 59 from France, 58 from Germany, 60 from Spain). Of these, 250 received tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy, 197 received immunotherapy (IO) combination (119 IO+TKI, 78 IO+IO), and 32 received IO monotherapy as first-line treatment for aRCC; 19 patients received various other regimens. 16% of patients had a favorable IMDC risk score. Based on results of multivariable Cox regression, PFS (hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.50 [0.36-0.72]) (P < .001) and time to next treatment (TTNT) were significantly longer (HR [95% CI]: 0.54 [0.39-0.73]) (P < .001) for patients treated with IO combination versus TKI monotherapy. IO combination had a numerically reduced, but statistically insignificant, risk of death versus TKI monotherapy (HR: 0.66; P = .114). IO+TKI combination was associated with significantly longer PFS and reduced risk of progression (HR: 0.52; P = .04) versus IO+IO combination; similar results were observed for TTNT (HR: 0.57; P = .03). ConclusionOur evaluation of real-world treatment outcomes in aRCC revealed that IO + TKI combination is associated with improved PFS and prolonged TTNT compared with TKI monotherapy and IO+IO combination.

Combining the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Cabozantinib and the mTORC1/2 Inhibitor Sapanisertib Blocks ERK Pathway Activity and Suppresses Tumor Growth in Renal Cell Carcinoma.

The molecular-guided therapeutic strategy of combining cabozantinib and sapanisertib restrains ERK activity to effectively suppress growth of renal cell carcinomas, including those unresponsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor combined tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy versus TKI monotherapy as the second-line regimen for patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal carcinoma (nccRCC) who failed first-line TKI therapy. Methods: The clinicopathological data of 67 patients with metastatic nccRCC who failed first-line TKI therapy between October 2011 and September 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, including 22 patients who received TKI monotherapy and 45 patients who received TKI plus PD-1 inhibitor as the second-line therapy. The efficacy was assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0/1.1 (RECIST 1.0/1.1), the Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot the survival curves, and the Log rank test was used to analyze the differences in the survival between the two groups. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) after treatment were observed in both groups. Results: The overall objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 37.3% (25/67) and 56.7% (38/67), respectively. The overall second-line progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.7 months and Overall Survival (OS) was 25.2 months. The ORR and DCR of patients in the combination therapy group were 48.9% (22/45) and 71.1% (32/45), respectively, which were significantly improved compared with the TKI monotherapy group [13.6% (3/22) and 27.3% (6/22), respectively] (P=0.007 and P=0.001, respectively). The median PFS of 9.2 months for second-line treatment was longer in patients in the combination therapy group than in the TKI monotherapy group (5.2 months, P=0.001), but the median OS was not statistically different between the two groups (28.2 months vs 20.8 months, P=0.068). Common treatment-related AEs included hypertension, diarrhea, fatigue, stomatitis, hand-foot syndrome, and hypothyroidism. The incidence of hypothyroidism was higher in the combination therapy group [40.0% (18/45)] than in the TKI monotherapy group [22.7% (5/22), P=0.044]; the incidence of other treatment-related AEs between the two groups were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). Conclusion: Immune-targeted combination therapy was more effective than TKI monotherapy alone and was well tolerated in the treatment of metastatic nccRCC patients who failed first-line TKIs.

Real-world Outcome of Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma and Intermediate- or Poor-risk International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium Criteria Treated by Immune-oncology Combinations: Differential Effectiveness by Risk Group?

BackgroundRenal c carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most common urinary cancers worldwide, with a predicted increase in incidence in the coming years. Immunotherapy, as a single agent, in doublets, or in combination with anti–vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), has rapidly become a cornerstone of the RCC therapeutic scenario, but no head-to-head comparisons have been made. In this setting, real-world evidence emerges as a cornerstone to guide clinical decisions. ObjectiveThe objective of this retrospective study was to assess the outcome of patients treated with first-line immune combinations or immune oncology (IO)-TKIs for advanced RCC. Design, setting, and participantsData from 930 patients, 654 intermediate risk and 276 poor risk, were collected retrospectively from 58 centers in 20 countries. Special data such as sarcomatoid differentiation, body mass index, prior nephrectomy, and metastatic localization, in addition to biochemical data such as hemoglobin, platelets, calcium, lactate dehydrogenase, neutrophils, and radiological response by investigator's criteria, were collected. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisOverall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median follow-up was calculated by the inverse Kaplan-Meier method. Results and limitationsThe median follow-up time was 18.7 mo. In the 654 intermediate-risk patients, the median OS and PFS were significantly longer in patients with the intermediate than in those with the poor International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria (38.9 vs 17.3 mo, 95% confidence interval [CI] p < 0.001, and 17.3 vs 11.6 mo, 95% CI p < 0.001, respectively). In the intermediate-risk subgroup, the OS was 55.7 mo (95% CI 31.4–55.7) and 40.2 mo (95% CI 29.6–51.6) in patients treated with IO + TKI and IO + IO combinations, respectively (p = 0.047). PFS was 30.7 mo (95% CI 16.5–55.7) and 13.2 mo (95% CI 29.6–51.6) in intermediate-risk patients treated with IO + TKI and IO + IO combinations, respectively (p < 0.001). In the poor-risk subgroup, the median OS and PFS did not show a statistically significant difference between IO + IO and IO + TKI. Our study presents several limitations, mainly due to its retrospective nature. ConclusionsOur results showed differences between the IO + TKI and IO + IO combinations in intermediate-risk patients. A clear association with longer PFS and OS in favor of patients who received the IO + TKI combinations compared with the IO-IO combination was observed. Instead, in the poor-risk group, we observed no significant difference in PFS or OS between patients who received different combinations. Patient summaryRenal cancer is one of the most frequent genitourinary tumors. Treatment is currently based on immunotherapy combinations or immunotherapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, but there are no comparisons between these.In this study, we have analyzed the clinical course of 930 patients from 58 centers in 20 countries around the world. We aimed to analyze the differences between the two main treatment strategies, combination of two immunotherapies versus immunotherapy + antiangiogenic therapy, and found in real-life data that intermediate-risk patients (approximately 60% of patients with metastatic renal cancer) seem to benefit more from the combination of immunotherapy + antiangiogenic therapy than from double immunotherapy. No such differences were found in poor-risk patients. This may have important implications in daily practice decision-making for these patients.

Effect on outcomes of toxicity-related dose reduction in TKI monotherapy or TKI-IO combination therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma.

4528 Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in monotherapy or TKI in combination with immunotherapeutic agents (IO) are standard of care fist-line treatment for advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Dose reduction due to toxicity is extremely frequently and represents an important clinical management issue, with frequent dose reduction, treatment suspension and change of schedule. We examined the outcomes of patient treated with TKI in monotherapy and in combination with immunotherapy (TKI-IO). Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes in patients with RCC treated with TKI (cohort 1) or TKI-IO (cohort 2) in Italian and Spanish institutions. A descriptive analysis was performed. Univariate logistic regression models were carried out to estimate the association between best response (CR or PR vs SD or PD) and type of TKI (monotherapy or combination therapy). Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared by the log-rank test. Cox proportional-hazard models were used to obtain hazard ratios (HRs) with 95%. Median follow-up was calculated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 401 patients were divided in cohort 1 (329 patients) and cohort 2 (72 patients). Median Follow-up was 81.22 months in cohort 1 and 19.02 months in cohort 2. Most frequent toxicities that lead to dose reduction were mucositis (20.13%), Asthenia (16.88%) and Hand-foot syndrome (15.58%). Overall Response Rate was higher in patients that reduced dose, both in cohort 1 (48% vs 29%, p&lt;0.01) and cohort 2 (81% vs 40%, p&lt;0.01). In cohort 1 Progression Free Survival (PFS) was longer in patients with dose reduction (27.14 months vs 16.59 months) (HR 0.77 [0.6; 0.98]; p=0.04). Overall Survival (OS) was also improved (55 months vs 34.17) (HR 0.71 [0.53; 0.93]; p=0.01). In cohort 2, both PFS (39.13 months vs 41.3 months) (HR 0.63 [0.27; 1.48]; p=0.29) and OS (39.13 months vs 55.85 months) (HR 0.65 [0.26; 1.63]; p=0.29) did not statistically differ between patients that reduced dose and patients that did not reduce dose. Conclusions: TKI dose reduction due to toxicity seems to be related to improved outcomes, both in ORR and PFS/OS. ORR was statistically improved in both cohort 1 and cohort 2. PFS and OS in cohort 1 favoured patients that experienced dose reduction. PFS and OS in cohort 2 did not show a statistically significant difference, probably due to the short follow-up and small number of patients. However, outcomes seem to show a trend toward favouring patients that reduce dose.

HDACIs and TKIs combinations and their liposomal delivery for cancer treatment.

Fixed-drug combinations have been used for the treatment of cancer. Current anticancer therapies, however, tend to induce resistance and provoke important toxicity. Therefore, there is still a need for further optimized treatments that would also take into account drug-drug interactions. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACIs) are two anticancer drug classes currently used separately in clinical practice. Those drug classes are currently being investigated in clinical trials. Several findings confirm the safety and tolerability of these treatments accompanied by clinical improvement. The activity and specificity of drug combinations can be further improved by employing appropriate drug delivery systems, such as nanocarrier systems. The different pharmacokinetic profiles of each drug may lead to a loss in synergistic effects, affecting treatment efficiency. Several combinations of either TKI or HDACI with an anticancer drug of another class co-loaded inside liposomal carriers are being investigated in vivo and show promising results in terms of efficacy and safety. In this review we discuss strategies for the delivery of synergistic drug combinations for cancer treatment.

Safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and camrelizumab in the treatment of patients with advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

4079 Background: Combined systemic and local therapy is a promising treatment strategy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and PD-1 antibodies are all recommended for patients with unresectable HCC (uHCC). This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with TKIs and camrelizumab in the treatment of uHCC. Methods: In this multicenter, single-arm phase II trial (ChiCTR2000039508), patients with intermediate-stage uHCC who had a Child-Pugh score ≤ 7 and had not received prior systemic anti-cancer treatment would receive treatment with TACE followed by immunotherapy with camrelizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks plus a TKI agent selected from lenvatinib (12 mg/day for bodyweight ≥60 kg or 8 mg/day for bodyweight &lt;60 kg), sorafenib 400 mg bid or donafenib 200 mg bid until intolerable toxicity or disease progression. During the study treatment, patients assessed as eligible for resection would undergo surgery. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per modified RECIST. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR) and overall survival (OS). Results: From September 2020 to November 2021, 87 patients (81 men and 6 women; median age, 56 years) were enrolled. Among them, 43 (49.4%) patients had extrahepatic metastases, and 65 (74.7%) patients had HBV infection. As of September 28, 2022, the median duration of follow-up was 13.6 (0.83-24.9) months. A total of 34 patients (39.1%) died, and the median OS was not reached. The median PFS was 10.5 months (95% CI: 7.8-13.1). The ORR rate was 71.3% (62/87), and the DCR rate was 89.7% (78/87) per mRECIST. According to RECIST version 1.1, the ORR rate was 35.6% (31/87), and the DCR rate was 87.4% (76/87). The ORR and PFS showed consistent benefits in subgroups based on ECOG score, HBV infection, baseline alpha-fetoprotein level, combined TKI, and the number of TACE treatments. Ten patients (11.5%) successfully underwent conversion therapy and all achieved R0 resection. Two patients achieved a complete pathological response (pCR) and four achieved a major pathological response (MPR). The most common AEs were hypoproteinemia (92%), elevated lactate dehydrogenase (80.5%), elevated glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (79.3%), elevated bilirubin (78.2%), abdominal pain (62.1%), nausea (33.3%), and RCCEP (26.4%). The incidence of grade 3-4 adverse reactions was 67.8%, and no treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: TACE combined with TKI and camrelizumab showed promising clinical benefits. It can effectively control tumor progression and provide opportunities for resection with acceptable safety, which will bring great benefits to uHCC. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2000039508 .

Clinical efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor in combination with regorafenib therapy as second⁃line regimen for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

e16105 Background: Combined systemic and local therapy is a promising treatment strategy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and PD-1 antibodies are all recommended for patients with unresectable HCC (uHCC). This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with TKIs and camrelizumab in the treatment of uHCC. Methods: In this multicenter, single-arm phase II trial (ChiCTR2000039508), patients with intermediate-stage uHCC who had a Child-Pugh score ≤ 7 and had not received prior systemic anti-cancer treatment would receive treatment with TACE followed by immunotherapy with camrelizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks plus a TKI agent selected from lenvatinib (12 mg/day for bodyweight ≥60 kg or 8 mg/day for bodyweight &lt;60 kg), sorafenib 400 mg bid or donafenib 200 mg bid until intolerable toxicity or disease progression. During the study treatment, patients assessed as eligible for resection would undergo surgery. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per modified RECIST. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR) and overall survival (OS). Results: From September 2020 to November 2021, 87 patients (81 men and 6 women; median age, 56 years) were enrolled. Among them, 43 (49.4%) patients had extrahepatic metastases, and 65 (74.7%) patients had HBV infection. As of September 28, 2022, the median duration of follow-up was 13.6 (0.83-24.9) months. A total of 34 patients (39.1%) died, and the median OS was not reached. The median PFS was 10.5 months (95% CI: 7.8-13.1). The ORR rate was 71.3% (62/87), and the DCR rate was 89.7% (78/87) per mRECIST. According to RECIST version 1.1, the ORR rate was 35.6% (31/87), and the DCR rate was 87.4% (76/87). The ORR and PFS showed consistent benefits in subgroups based on ECOG score, HBV infection, baseline alpha-fetoprotein level, combined TKI, and the number of TACE treatments. Ten patients (11.5%) successfully underwent conversion therapy and all achieved R0 resection. Two patients achieved a complete pathological response (pCR) and four achieved a major pathological response (MPR). The most common AEs were hypoproteinemia (92%), elevated lactate dehydrogenase (80.5%), elevated glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (79.3%), elevated bilirubin (78.2%), abdominal pain (62.1%), nausea (33.3%), and RCCEP (26.4%). The incidence of grade 3-4 adverse reactions was 67.8%, and no treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: TACE combined with TKI and camrelizumab showed promising clinical benefits. It can effectively control tumor progression and provide opportunities for resection with acceptable safety, which will bring great benefits to uHCC.