Types Of Intraocular Lenses Research Articles

Vision-related Quality of Life after Bilateral Implantation of Monofocal and Multifocal Intraocular Lenses.

PurposeTo evaluate vision-related quality of life in two sets of patients after routine cataract surgery implanting with traditional versus multifocal intraocular lens (IOLs).MethodsIn a cross-sectional prospective study, 58 and 33 candidates for cataract surgery were divided into traditional (Acrysof SN60WF, Alcon Laboratories, Inc) and multifocal IOL (AcrySof IQ PanOptix IOL TFNT00, Alcon Laboratories, Inc.) groups, respectively. The primary outcome was VFQ-25 scores. The secondary outcomes were making comparisons between the two IOL types in the near vision and the driving items.Resultsmean patients' age in traditional and multifocal IOL groups was 60.85 7.40 (55% female) and 59.85 8.95 (36% female) years, respectively. The mean VFQ-25 total scores in traditional and multifocal IOL groups before and after surgery were 63.69 4.95 and 72.15 9.66, and 98.08 0.70 and 95.70 1.30, respectively (P = 0.001 & 0.001). The mean scores of night driving in traditional and multifocal IOL groups were 38.79 20.50 and 44.35 21.12 (P = 0.1) before surgery which improved to 97.41 7.68 and 56.45 11.12 after surgery, respectively (P = 0.001). The mean scores of near vision in traditional and multifocal IOL groups were 46.83 10.56 and 50.53 8.58 (P = 0.2) before surgery which improved to 89.94 4.87 and 100.00 0.00 after surgery, respectively (P = 0.001).ConclusionVision-related quality of life after cataract surgery with either type of traditional or multifocal (PanOptix) IOLs improved to an excellent level. Traditional IOLs provided more satisfaction in nighttime driving while multifocal IOLs provided increased satisfaction in near and intermediate vision.

The Importance of IOL Selection in Patients With Young-age Cataracts: a Case Report

Background: A cataract is a type of degenerative change of the lens, which is characterized by the clouding of the lens followed by symptoms of optical deterioration. Over 70 years ago, Sir Harold Ridley implanted the first useable modern-day intraocular lens (IOL) implant. A lot has happened since then. The IOL is arguably the most life-changing and innovative implant in the history of medicine. Currently, there are several types of intraocular lenses on the market. The main classification could be monofocal lenses, multifocal, trifocal, extended depth of focus (EDOF) lenses, and toric lenses. Objective: The aim of this case report is to report the importance of IOL selection in patients with young-age cataracts. Case report: A 35-year-old patient presented first time at our Clinic. In the last six months, he noticed poor vision in his left eye, even with spectacles. The right eye was operated on in another institution in 2020, due to the presence of a young-age cataract. After a complete preoperative ophthalmological examination, we discovered the presence of a cataract in the left eye. UDVA of the left eye was 0.4, and CDVA was +0.50/+0.50/30°=0.5. UNVA and DCNVA was J2. We decided to implant TECNIS Synergy™ IOL (Johnson & Johnson Vision, Santa Ana, CA, USA) during the cataract surgery. That EDOF IOL bridges the gap between the performance of monofocal and multifocal IOLs and delivers continuous high-contrast vision for patients with cataracts from far through near, even in low-light conditions. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. On a 7-day, check-up UDVA of the left eye was 1.0, and UNVA was J1. The patient was satisfied with the vision in the left eye, so he wanted to correct the vision of the right eye which was implanted with SENSAR® IOL (Johnson & Johnson Vision, Santa Ana, CA, USA), with a residual diopter of +2.00/+1.00/120 for distance, and +4.50/+1.00/120 for near vision. This choice of IOL in the other institution was not an ideal solution for this patient due to his young age and occupation. The capsular bag was already in slight fibrosis, so the explantation of the existing IOL and implantation of the new one was not a reasonable option. We decided to go with the multifocal AddOn® toric lens (1stQ GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), the refractive-surgery platform for vision enhancement of pseudophakic eyes, that also correct residual astigmatism. On a 7-day check-up, this patient’s UDVA was 1.0 and UNVA was J1. The result was a happy patient, who could go back to his everyday life without spectacle independence. Conclusion: Good unaided distance visual acuity (VA) is now a realistic expectation following cataract surgery and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. We should be aware of patient expectations and demands, especially when having a patient with young-age cataracts. Often more time should be spent on preoperative IOL planning than cataract surgery itself.

Sulcus implantation of single-piece foldable acrylic intraocular lens after posterior capsule tear during phacoemulsification: Visual outcome and complications

Background: Posterior capsule tear (PCT) during phacoemulsification affects the type, site, and timing of intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Aim: The aim was to evaluate the visual outcomes and complications following sulcus implantation of single-piece foldable acrylic IOL after PCT during phacoemulsification. Setting and Design: The retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care center in eastern India. Methods: Records of patients between July 2017 and March 2020 were reviewed. Thirty-six eyes of 36 patients, in whom PCT had occurred during phacoemulsification, were included. Statistical Analysis Used: Microsoft Excel 2007 and SPSS 108 software were used. Preoperative and postoperative visual acuity was compared using paired t-tests. Postoperative visual outcomes and complications were assessed in percentage. Results: Postoperative visual acuity was ≥6/12 in 22 (61.11%) patients on day 1 and 30 (83.33%) patients on day 30, with a statistically significant improvement compared to preoperative vision (P < 0.05). On the first postoperative day, corneal edema was seen in 8 (22.22%) patients, increased anterior chamber reaction in 5 (13.89%) patients, and raised IOP in 4 (11.11%) patients. After 3 months, 2 (5.56%) patients needed antiglaucoma medications for IOP control, 1 (2.78%) had iridocyclitis, and 1 (2.78%) had chronic cystoid macular edema. The mean follow-up duration was 17.44 ± 12.15 months (range: 3–46 months). Conclusion: To conclude, sulcus implantation of posterior chamber IOL during phacoemulsification surgery complicated with PCT may be considered if the adequate lens is not available, and sufficient capsular support exists. Our study revealed a good final visual acuity with minimal complications, though more research to ascertain our results is warranted.

Long-term clinical outcomes obtained with bilateral implantation of a multifocal intraocular lens through two different-sized corneal incisions

PURPOSE:To evaluate the long-term visual function and patient satisfaction in patients implanted bilaterally with the same type of multifocal intraocular lens (MIOL), using either a 2.2 mm small corneal incision with bimanual irrigation/aspiration (I/A) or a conventional 2.75 mm incision with coaxial I/A.METHODS:Prospective nonrandomized study including 100 eyes of 50 patients who underwent bilateral implantation of ReSTOR SN6AD1 through a 2.2 mm or 2.75 mm corneal incision. Outcomes included visual function measures (near, intermediate, and distance visual acuity [VA]), achievement of targeted refraction and postoperative astigmatism. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a subjective questionnaire.RESULTS:Three and 12 months postoperatively, distance uncorrected best VA (UBVA) was 0.98 ± 0.07, UBVA at 30 cm was J1 in 100% of cases and UBVA at 60 cm was J3 in 72% of cases. Targeted refraction was achieved in 84% of cases and postoperative astigmatism was −0.4 ± 0.3 diopters. There was no statistically significant difference in UBVA in all distances, targeted refraction and postoperative astigmatism between the small-incision bimanual and the conventional coaxial group. Sixty percent of the patients were satisfied, 30% were very satisfied and 10% declared that the result did not meet their expectations. Three out of 5 nonsatisfied patients had an angle kappa of 4° and the MIOL was not well-centered.CONCLUSION:An incision size of 2.2 mm compared to 2.75 mm, did not appear to result in less surgically induced astigmatism after the implantation of a MIOL. SN6AD1 is a reliable MIOL choice for spectacle independence. Good preoperative patient selection is of crucial importance for the outcome in MIOLs.

Comparison of Patient Outcomes following Implantation of Trifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Purpose The purpose is to compare the outcomes of implantation of trifocal intraocular lenses (TIOLs) and extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs). Methods A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrial.gov was conducted in March 2020 to identify relevant studies. A meta-analysis of the results was performed. Patients implanted with EDOF IOLs or TIOLs in previous studies were included. The primary outcomes of the study were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), and defocus curve. Results TIOLs and EDOF IOLs provided comparable binocular UDVA (MD = -0.01, 95% CI: -0.04, 0.03, logMAR). However, EDOF IOLs provided better UIVA (MD: -0.08, 95% CI: -0.14, -0.01, logMAR) and worse UNVA (MD: 0.10, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.14, logMAR) than TIOLs. Fewer patients achieved spectacle independence after implantation of EDOF IOLs (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63, 0.87) than after implantation of TIOLs, especially for near vision (RR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.68, 0.99). There was no statistically significant difference in contrast sensitivity (CS) under photopic or mesopic conditions with both IOLs. Patient satisfaction after implantation of both IOLs was high. Conclusion EDOF IOLs and TIOLs provide comparable distance vision. However, EDOF IOLs provide better intermediate vision and worse near vision than TIOLs. The advantages of EDOF IOLs over TIOLs in terms of CS, aberrations, and visual disturbance are not significant. Patients are satisfied with both types of IOLs.

Silicone Oil Adhesion to Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lenses: A Comparative Laboratory Study of a New versus an Established Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lens Material.

Background In vitro assessment of silicone oil adhesion to a new hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) material, the Clareon model CNA0T0, compared with the established AcrySof model SN60WF was carried out. Methods Silicone oil adhesion was assessed for two types of IOLs, Clareon CNA0T0 (n = 10) and AcrySof SN60WF (n = 10). Lenses were immersed in an aqueous sodium chloride solution for 12 hours and then incubated at room temperature in silicone oil for 12 hours. The lenses were washed with distilled water and photographed at 25x magnification using a microscope. The percent coverage was calculated by dividing the area of oil coverage by the total surface area of the lens. Results Silicone oil adhesion to the surface of the CNA0T0 lens ranged from 4% to 22%, with a mean ± SD coverage of 8% ± 4%. Silicone oil adhesion to the surface of the SN60WF lens ranged from 1% to 17%, with a mean coverage of 9% ± 4%. The silicone oil adhesion of CNA0T0 was equivalent to that of SN60WF (P > 0.05). Conclusions The new Clareon model CNA0T0 IOL has silicone oil adhesion and interaction that are equivalent to the established AcrySof IOL.

Nd:YAG Capsulotomy Rates with Two Multifocal Intraocular Lenses.

PurposeTo investigate the incidence of Nd:YAG capsulotomy after implantation of two types of multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOLs).MethodsThis retrospective analysis included patients who had undergone cataract extraction and implanted diffractive MIOL (Acri. LISA tri 839M) or asymmetric refractive MIOL (SBL-3) from May 2016 to September 2018. They were followed up for at least 3 years. During the follow-up period, the relevant data of patients were kept by special person in the hospital. The rates of Nd:YAG capsulotomy and the Kaplan–Meier survival curve were used to analyze the two groups.ResultsThe Asymmetric Refractive MIOL group was comprised of 98 patients (121 eyes), while the Diffractive MIOL group was comprised of 99 patients (120 eyes). There were no significant differences in age, sex, or IOL power between the two groups. The Nd:YAG rate of the asymmetric refractive MIOL group and the diffractive MIOL group was 3.3% and 7.5% respectively (P = 0.15) in the first year, 14.88% and 22.5% respectively (P = 0.129) in the second year, and 21.49% and 34.17% respectively (P = 0.028) in the third year. In the first 7 months of follow-up, the two groups showed the same performance in the Nd:YAG rate. After that, there was a difference between the two groups, and the difference gradually increased. Until the 27th month of follow-up, the difference was significant (P < 0.05). What is more, there were significant differences in survival (without Nd:YAG capsulotomy)/failure (with Nd:YAG capsulotomy) functions (P = 0.0035).ConclusionThe incidence of Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy in patients with diffractive MIOLs was higher than that in patients with asymmetric refractive MIOLs.

COMPARISON OF OPTICAL BIOMETRY AND A SCAN FOR CALCULATION OF INTRAOCULAR LENS POWER IN AGE RELATED NUCLEAR CATARACT AT TERTIARY CARE EYE HOSPITAL

Objective: To compare optical biometry and A-scan for calculating intraocular lens power in patients with nuclear cataract at tertiary care eye hospital.&#x0D; Study Design: Cross sectional comparative study.&#x0D; Place and Duration of Study: Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology, Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, from Jul to Dec 2018.&#x0D; Methodology: In this study 70 eyes of 70 patients planned for cataract surgery by phacoemulsification underwent both optical biometry with intraocular lens master and ultrasound biometry applanation by A scan after informed consent. Intraocular lens power calculated by these two methods of biometry was compared. Phacoemulsification surgery was performed through a 2.3 mm superior temporal clear corneal incision. All patients underwent in the bag implantation of the same intraocular lens type.&#x0D; Results: The mean age of the patients was 62.89 ± 6.69 years. A significant (p-value&lt;0.001) difference in intraocular lens power calculation was noted (20.96 ± 1.76 vs. 22.03 ± 1.61) with optical biometry and A-scan respectively. Association on the basis of age groups showed a significant (p-value&lt;0.001) difference in both strata that was among patients having age ≤65 years and patients having age &gt;65 years.&#x0D; Conclusion: Optical biometry was found efficient and safe method for calculation of intraocular lens power. Optical biometry is noncontact method having very less chance of infection and suitable for most of the eye types.

Cases of replacing diffractive bifocal intraocular lens with extended depth of focus intraocular lens due to waxy vision.

PurposeTo investigate the postoperative course of patients who explanted a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens (IOL) due to waxy vision and implanted with an extended depth of focus IOL.MethodsThis study evaluated 29 eyes of 25 patients who underwent diffractive bifocal IOL explantation followed by TECNIS Symfony® implantation because of dissatisfaction due to waxy vision at the Takabatake West Eye Clinic between January 2018 and November 2019. The indication criteria for this surgery were patients with uncorrected distance visual acuity of 0.05 logMAR or better, without eye diseases that may affect visual function, and no dissatisfactions about photic phenomena. We investigated patient demographics, uncorrected and corrected visual acuity, manifest refraction, contrast sensitivity, subjective symptoms, time to IOL explantation, explanted IOL type, and spectacle independence.ResultsThe time to the IOL exchange after the initial IOL implantation was 55.3 ± 50.4 days (range: 14–196 days). The logMAR corrected distance visual acuity before and after IOL exchange were −0.13 ± 0.06 and −0.14 ± 0.06, respectively (p = 0.273). After IOL exchange surgery, the area under log contrast sensitivity function increased significantly from 1.07 ± 0.12 to 1.21 ± 0.12 (p < 0.001), and the waxy vision symptoms improved. The spectacle independence rate at the last visit was 88.0%.ConclusionFor patients who complain of waxy vision despite good visual acuity after diffractive bifocal IOL implantation, exchange to extended depth of focus IOL was considered one of the useful surgical options.

Expectations and Reality in Surgical Rehabilitation of Cataract Patients

The aim. To study the effect of surgical treatment of cataracts on the quality of life of patients and assess satisfaction with the results after implantation of a monofocal or multifocal intraocular lens (IOL), depending on the initial refraction.&#x0D; Materials and methods. We examined 140 patients (280 eyes) who underwent phacoemulsification with IOL (bilateral) according to the standard technique using multimodal anesthesia. The observation groups were divided depending on the initial type of refraction and the type of intraocular correction (mono- or multifocal IOL). The analysis of&#x0D; the results of surgical treatment of cataracts with IOL was assessed taking into account the initial refraction according to objective data, i.e. determination of distance and near visual acuity, and subjective data, i.e. the NEI-VFQ-25 quality of life questionnaire, patient questionnaire survey and assessment of the quality of vision in general, as well as distance, near, and night vision.&#x0D; Results and discussion. Before surgery, the mean values of indicators by all scales of the questionnaire of the quality of life related to the quality of vision ranged from 40 to 60 points and averaged 47 ± 0.5 points. After cataract surgery, the numerical indicator by each of the scales shifted to the range of 85 to 100 points. The difference in values by the scales “activity associated with distance vision” and “driving a car” was obtained. In patients with multifocal IOL, these indicators were lower compared with monofocal implantation. Dissatisfaction with distance vision was observed during the implantation of a multifocal IOL only in patients with hyperopia (12.5%), dissatisfaction with near vision was noted only in patients with myopia (16.7%), and no cases of dissatisfaction were observed in the group of patients with emmetropia. Analysis of night vision in patients with emmetropia also revealed the minimum percentage (2.5%) of cases of dissatisfaction in patients with hyperopia (5.0%) and the maximum in those with myopia (16.7%).&#x0D; Conclusions. IOL implantation is a single cataract treatment option that provides a high level of the patient’s satisfaction with the quality of life and visual functions. However, careful individual approach is required to select the type of implantable IOL, taking into account the patient’s needs and baseline refraction.

Имплантация мультифокального хрусталика в хирургии катаракты у пациентов после витреоретинальной операции

Purpose. To study the results of cataract surgery with implantation of multifocal IOLs in patients with various retinal pathologies who underwent vitreoretinal surgery. Material and мethods. Fifteen patients who had previously undergone vitreoretinal interventions for macular hole (n=6), epiretinal membrane (n=4) and retinal detachment (n=5) were observed. The criterion for choosing in favor of multifocal lens implantation was high visual acuity (0.7 or more) after undergoing vitreoretinal surgery. All patients underwent cataract phacoemulsification with implantation of two types of multifocal lenses: I group – IOL with an extended near focus (EDOF) (n=8) and II group – with a multifocal three-focus lens (n=7 eyes), including, in 3 cases – with toric component. In 55% of cases, the operation was performed on both eyes. The age of the patients varied from 34 to 59 years (51.4 ± 6.1 years). Results. Long-distance uncorrected visual acuity varied from 0.7 to 1.0 (0.85±0.25), which did not depend on the type of intraocular lens and correlated with morphological changes in the macular region of the retina. The highest uncorrected visual acuity (0.8±0.14) at an intermediate and near distance (0.75±0.25) was achieved in I group of patients. Postoperative spherical equivalent after 1 month corresponded to the planned target refraction (Em±0.5 diopters) in 14 cases and remained stable during 12 months of observation. In general, subjective satisfaction with MIOL implantation was higher in patients in II group, which was explained by minimal changes in the macular region of the retina. Additional spectacle correction for near was required for a patient of I group with a history of macular rupture, who underwent bilateral multifocal IOL implantation with high uncorrected visual acuity in the distance (OD=1.0 \ OS=1.0) and near (OD=0.6 \ OS=0,5). Conclusion. Implantation of multifocal lenses in patients with a good anatomical and functional outcome of vitreoretinal surgery allows obtaining high and stable functional results. Bilateral implantation of a multifocal lens with an extended near focus in patients with operated macular pathology does not cause specific adaptive difficulties in binocular vision. The choice in favor of multifocal lens implantation in patients with vitreoretinal pathology requires an individual approach and careful selection. Key words: multifocal lens, cataract, macular hole, retinal detachment, epiretinal membrane.

The Effect of Age, Postoperative Refraction, and Pre- and Postoperative Pupil Size on Halo Size and Intensity in Eyes Implanted with a Trifocal or Extended Depth-of-Focus Lens.

PurposeHalos are a chief source of patient dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of age, postoperative refraction, and pre- and postoperative pupil size on postoperative halo size with a trifocal diffractive IOL (AcrySof IQ PanOptix) and extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) IOL (TECNIS Symfony) to determine whether these factors could predict postoperative halo size.Patients and MethodsThis single-center, open-label study conducted between October 2018 and April 2020 in Yokosuka, Japan included 160 patients: 80 with PanOptix and 80 with Symfony IOLs. Size and intensity of the halos were examined binocularly using a computer-based simulator (Eyeland Design Network GmbH) and scored from 0 (minimum) to 10 (maximum) at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively, along with the change in each variable for both IOLs. The respective correlations of halo size with age, postoperative refraction, pre- and postoperative pupil size, and discomfort level due to the halo were also investigated 6 months postoperatively.ResultsHalo size and intensity were significantly mitigated between 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Throughout the observation period, halo size was significantly larger with PanOptix than with Symphony (P < 0.05), and halo intensity was significantly higher with Symphony than with PanOptix (P < 0.05). The pre- and postoperative pupil size correlated positively with halo size, while age and postoperative refraction were negatively correlated, for both IOLs.ConclusionUnderstanding the features and predictive preoperative factors of halos in different types of multifocal IOLs may be useful in improving patient satisfaction.

Citation network analysis of the various types of multifocal intraocular lenses.

The implantation of multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) has increased in recent years, allowing patients to achieve good quality vision at all distances, independence from use of glasses, and consequently, an increase in quality of life. The main purpose of this study was to analyse the links between publications and authors via citation networks, as well to as identify the different research areas and determine the most cited publications. The publication search was performed through the Web of Science database, using the terms «Multifocal intraocular lens», «Bifocal intraocular lens», «Trifocal intraocular lens», «Diffractive intraocular lens», «Refractive intraocular lens», «Accommodative intraocular lens» and «Extended depth of focus intraocular lens», for a time interval from 1989 to August 2020. The software used to analyse the publications was the Citation Network Explorer. A total of 1293 publications were found, with 11,730 citations generated in the network, and 2019 had the highest number of publications of any year. The most cited publication was «European multicenter study of the AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive intraocular lens» by Kohnen et al., published in 2006. Four groups about different research areas in this field were found using the Clustering functionality: visual quality, IOL designs, ocular aberrations, or defocus curves. The citation network offers an objective and comprehensive analysis of the main articles on the different designs and classes of multifocal IOL.

The influence of intraocular lens dislocation surgical correction method on corneal endothelium

BACKGROUND:Intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation is a rare but serious complication of surgical treatment of patients with cataract. Among the factors contributing to its development, the main ones are pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEX), high axial myopia, chronic uveitis, history of eye injury and age. There is no universal IOL dislocation correction technique.&#x0D; PURPOSE:To evaluate the impact on corneal endothelium of two different methods of IOL dislocation correction: IOL repositioning with transscleral suture fixation or IOL exchange to iris-claw one.&#x0D; MATERIALS AND METHODS:Within the study, 78 patients were examined and operated. All patients were divided into two groups: in the first group, IOL was repositioned with transscleral suture fixation, and in the second group IOL was exchanged to iris-claw IOL. Groups were equal by gender and age. Key estimated indicators were endothelial cell density and coefficient of variation reflecting the degree of polymegatism.&#x0D; RESULTS:Endothelial cell density was significantly lower both before surgery and at any term after it, in the group with IOL exchange, and coefficient of variation was significantly higher in the group with IOL exchange throughout this study.&#x0D; CONCLUSION:The choice of technique for IOL dislocation correction is the basis of success in surgical treatment. Certain preoperative examination data should be definitely considered, including the degree of dislocation, IOL type, IOP level, endothelial cell density and presence of concomitant ocular conditions.

Visual Outcomes Following Traumatic Cataract Surgery in Children in Mongolia: Experience Over 2 Years at a Major Hospital

Objective: To describe the demographics, nature of the injury and visual outcomes of pediatric patients presenting with traumatic cataract requiring surgery at the National Center for Maternal and Child Health in Mongolia and to compare the relevant literature on traumatic pediatric cataracts in other countries. Methods: The charts of individuals aged ≤ 18 years who underwent surgery for traumatic cataract over a two-year period at a pediatric hospital were reviewed. The data collected included: demographic information, mode and time of injury, intraocular lens type, surgeries pre- and post-operative best-corrected visual acuity, and surgical complications. Results: Over the 2-year study period, 27 children underwent cataract surgery for traumatic cataract. The mean age was 8.52 ± 4.7 years (range, 1-17 years). The type of primary insult was penetrating injury in over 80% of patients. The mean interval between injury and cataract surgery was 7 ± 6.5months. Pre-cataract surgery no patient had vision better than 20/40; after cataract surgery 36% had 20/50. Conclusion: A better understanding of the causes of eye injuries and the environments in which they occur can provide informed educated strategies for parents, caregivers, and teachers and can possibly reduce time to treatment.

Relationship Between Postoperative Intraocular Lens Shift and Postoperative Refraction Change in Cataract Surgery Using Three Different Types of Intraocular Lenses.

IntroductionUnderstanding the relationship between postoperative intraocular lens (IOL) shift and refractive change is crucial for the accuracy of predicted postoperative refraction (PPR). We assessed the relationships between different IOL fixation methods, haptic designs, and several metrics.MethodsSingle-center, open-label study which included 69 eyes. We preoperatively measured the anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), axial length (AL), and PPR. AcrySof IQ (n = 27) and FineVision (n = 24) were fixed in the bag, and FEMTIS (n = 18) was fixed in capsulorhexis. At 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month postoperatively, we checked the IOL position and refraction and compared the IOL shift, refraction change, and the margin of error of the predicted PPR (PR-PPR difference). We also analyzed the correlation between postoperative and preoperative variables.ResultsFEMTIS showed the highest stability in terms of IOL shift and refraction. The in-the-bag-fixated IOLs showed a significant forward shift between 1 day and 1 week postoperatively. There were significant differences in the PR-PPR difference between the IOLs. ACD and AL showed significant positive correlations, and LT showed a significant negative correlation with IOL shift and change in PR between 1 day and 1 week, but not between 1 week and 1 month postoperatively.ConclusionThe relationship between postoperative IOL shift and refraction change varied according to IOLs with different haptic types. Capsulorhexis fixation may be more stable than in-the-bag fixation. Furthermore, preoperative ACD, LT, and AL may be useful factors to predict IOL shift, change in PR, and to a lesser extent the degree of the margin of error in clinical practice. Our findings may improve the accuracy of PPR and refractive outcomes.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40123-021-00390-x.

Visual Performance Following Bilateral Implantation of Refractive Rotationally Asymmetric Bifocal Intraocular Lens (LS-313 MF30) or Apodized Diffractive Bifocal Intraocular Lens (ReSTOR SN6AD1).

PurposeThis study compared the clinical outcomes after cataract surgery with implantation of refractive rotationally asymmetric bifocal intraocular lens (IOL) (LS-313 MF30) and apodized diffractive bifocal IOL (ReSTOR SN6AD1).MethodsThis was a prospective, non-randomized, controlled study, where patients diagnosed with age-related cataracts were selected for phacoemulsification combined with bilateral IOL implantation. Based on the type of IOL voluntarily implanted, the patients were divided into two groups, ie, refractive and diffractive groups. In total, 30 cases (60 eyes) were in a refractive group, while 30 cases (60 eyes) were in diffractive group. Three months after surgery, we examined the uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), defocus curve, objective visual quality, and subjective questionnaire.ResultsThree months after surgery, the UIVA of the refractive group (0.18 ± 0.08) logMAR was better than that of the diffractive group (0.29 ± 0.16) logMAR (P < 0.05). No significant difference in UDVA and UNVA was noted between the two groups. For a 4mm pupil diameter, the intraocular and total eye aberration, higher-order aberration (HOA), coma, spherical aberration, and trefoil in the refractive group were significantly higher than those in diffractive group (P < 0.05). The intraocular modulation transfer function (MTF), intraocular strehl ratio (SR), total eye MTF, and total eye SR in the refractive group were lower than those in diffractive group (P < 0.05). No significant difference in glare incidence, spectacle independence rate, and patient satisfaction was observed between the two groups (P > 0.05). The halos incidence in the refractive group was lower than the diffractive group (P < 0.05).ConclusionBoth bifocal IOLs obtained satisfactory UDVA and UNVA, with higher patient satisfaction. Unlike the apodized diffractive bifocal IOL, the refractive rotationally asymmetric bifocal IOL yielded slightly better UIVA, lower halos incidence, whereas the apodized diffractive bifocal IOL showed a better objective visual quality.

Comparison of post-op quality of vision of spheric IOL and aspheric hydrophilic acrylic yellow tinted intraocular lens implantation following phacoemulsification cataract surgery

Purpose: To compare the post-op visual quality of spheric and aspheric acrylic yellow tinted intraocular lens following phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Place of study: Al-Majeed Laser Eye Hospital. Methods: Total 60 subjects (aged 40-65years) with age related mature cataracts were included. Data was assembled by non-probability convenient sampling technique at Al-Majeed Laser Eye Hospital. All patients presenting with mature cataract were include in this study without any other pathology and fundus abnormality. Pre and post-operative visual acuity was measured by using standard snellen visual acuity testing chart. For the purpose of accuracy repetitive values were taken for each patient. Post-operative vision was recorded one month followed by phacoemulsification. Comparisons was made between spheric and asphereic acrylic yellow tinted intraocular lens by applying (descriptive) statistics and paired sample t test for the analysis of results. Results: Quality of vision was compared post-operatively after implantation of aspheric hydrophilic acrylic IOL and spheric IOL in posterior chamber under the same phaco surgeon. All subjects after intra ocular implantation had better corrected visual acuity of 6/9 and more improved 6/6. There were found statistically differences in recorded visual acuity with aspheric yellow tinted iol implanation and spheric iol (p = 0.15) between the two types of intra-ocular lens. The mean, standard deviation, t-value found with spheric IOL were.1867, .18889, 2.517 respectively. However, of aspheric hydrophilic acrylic intra-ocular lens mean, standard deviation and t values found .800, .13493 and 2.5493 respectively. There was significant variance in statistics and quality of vision between the two types of lenses. Conclusions: This study concludes that post –operative improvement in quality of vision was better with aspheric hydrophilic yellow tinted lenses than spheric iol implantation. Implanting a foldable aspheric acrylic IOL gave much advantage in visual outcome to pseudophakes by protecting retina from light of shorter wavelength and decrease of chromatic aberration under the photopic circumstances particularly in subjects at hazard of age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Influence of lens position as detected by an anterior segment analysis system on postoperative refraction in cataract surgery.

To predict postoperative intraocular lens (IOL) position using the Sirius anterior segment analysis system and investigate the effect of lens position and IOL type on postoperative refraction. A total of 97 patients (102 eyes) were enrolled in the final analysis. An anterior segment biometry measurement was performed preoperatively with Sirius and Lenstar. The results of predicted lens position (PLP) and IOL power were automatically calculated by the software used by the instruments. Effective lens position (ELP) was measured manually using Sirius 3mo postoperatively. Pearson's correlation analysis and linear regression analysis were used to determine the correlation of lens position to other parameters. PLP and ELP were positively correlated to axial length (AL; r=0.42, P<0.0001 and r=0.49, P<0.0001, respectively). There was a weak correlation between the peLP (ELP-PLP) and the prediction error of spherical refraction (peSR; r=0.34, P<0.0001). The peLP of Softec HD IOL differed statistically from those of both the TECNIS ZCB00 and Sensor AR40E IOLs. Multiple linear regression was used to obtain the prediction formula: ELP=0.66+0.63×[aqueous depth (AQD)+0.6LT] (r=0.61, P<0.0001), and a new variable (AQD+0.6 LT) was found to have the strongest correlation with ELP. The Sirius anterior segment analysis system is helpful to predict ELP, which reduces postoperative refraction error.

Методы коррекции афакии при силиконовой тампонаде витреальной полости

The purpose of this study is to conduct a comparative analysis of the correction of aphakia by various models of intraocular lenses using silicon oil tamponade (SO) of the vitreous cavity. Materials and methods. The studies were conducted on 16 eyes of patients aged from 56 to 75 years (65.5±12 years) with aphakia and pathology of the vitreal cavity. The duration of the silicone tamponade was 2-3 months. Depending on the use of the type of IOL, all patients were divided into 2 groups. Results. When using an anterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL), the presence of ophthalmic hypertension was revealed in 75% of cases, which is 2.02 times higher than when using transcleral IOL fixation. In 37.5% of cases, the SO output to the anterior chamber is determined, in contrast to the group where IOL hemming was used. A higher percentage of SO migration to the anterior chamber of the eye in group 2 patients is due to a violation of the anatomy of the anterior chamber barrier and the vitreal cavity. Conclusion. Thus, in patients who underwent transcleral IOL fixation, visual acuity is 2.1 times higher than in patients who were implanted with an anterior chamber IOL. Transcleral fixation of the IOL can form the necessary barrier between the anterior and posterior chambers of the eye, and is also the closest IOL position to the physiological one. Key words: intraocular lens, silicone oil, transcleral fixation.