Types Of Cancer Vaccines Research Articles

Recent Findings on Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines: An Updated Review.

Cancer remains one of the global leading causes of death and various vaccines have been developed over the years against it, including cell-based, nucleic acid-based, and viral-based cancer vaccines. Although many vaccines have been effective in in vivo and clinical studies and some have been FDA-approved, there are major limitations to overcome: (1) developing one universal vaccine for a specific cancer is difficult, as tumors with different antigens are different for different individuals, (2) the tumor antigens may be similar to the body's own antigens, and (3) there is the possibility of cancer recurrence. Therefore, developing personalized cancer vaccines with the ability to distinguish between the tumor and the body's antigens is indispensable. This paper provides a comprehensive review of different types of cancer vaccines and highlights important factors necessary for developing efficient cancer vaccines. Moreover, the application of other technologies in cancer therapy is discussed. Finally, several insights and conclusions are presented, such as the possibility of using cold plasma and cancer stem cells in developing future cancer vaccines, to tackle the major limitations in the cancer vaccine developmental process.

Lipid- and Polymer-Based Nanocarrier Platforms for Cancer Vaccine Delivery.

Cancer immunotherapy has gained popularity in recent years in the search for effective treatment modalities for various malignancies, particularly those that are resistant to conventional chemo- and radiation therapy. Cancer vaccines target the cancer-immunity cycle by boosting the patient's own immune system to recognize and kill cancer cells, thus serving as both preventative and curative therapeutic tools. Among the different types of cancer vaccines, those based on nanotechnology have shown great promise in advancing the field of cancer immunotherapy. Lipid-based nanoparticles (NPs) have become the most advanced platforms for cancer vaccine delivery, but polymer-based NPs have also received considerable interest. This Review aims to provide an overview of the nanotechnology-enabled cancer vaccine landscape, focusing on recent advances in lipid- and polymer-based nanovaccines and their hybrid structures and discussing the challenges against the clinical translation of these important nanomedicines.

Rational design of adjuvants boosts cancer vaccines.

Cancer vaccines are expected to be next breakthrough in cancer immunotherapy. In cancer vaccines, adjuvants play an important role by enhancing and reshaping tumor antigen-specific immune responses. Failures in previous cancer vaccine clinical trials can be attributed to inappropriate selection and design of tumor antigens and adjuvants. Using basic theories of tumor immunology, the development of sequencing technology and nanotechnology enables the creation of cancer vaccines through appropriate selection of tumor antigens and adjuvants and their nanoscale assembly based on the specific characteristics of each tumor. In this chapter, we begin by discussing the various types of cancer vaccines and categories of tumor antigens. Then, we summarize the classification of adjuvants for cancer vaccines, including immunostimulatory molecules and delivery systems, and clarify the various factors that influence the properties of adjuvants, such as chemical composition, structure, and surface modification. Finally, we provide perspectives and insights on rational design of adjuvants in cancer vaccines to enhance their efficacy.

Research Progress of Cancer Vaccine

Cancer has now become the major cause of pre-mature death around the world. In the past decades, research on tumor immunotherapy has advanced significantly, with numerous studies being evaluated in the clinical setting. The cancer vaccine is regarded as an advantageous approach in the immunotherapy of solid tumors. Preventive cancer vaccines can be injected in advance to reduce the risk of having cancer, while therapeutic vaccines can be used to trigger immunoresponse after having cancer. For example, recent studies have found that vaccination with one or more doses of the HPV vaccine produces more than 90 percent effective protection. In the meantime, the best and safest way to prevent hepatitis B is to get the hepatitis B vaccine. This paper introduces the mechanisms of both two types of cancer vaccines, and focuses on the explanation of the two cancer vaccine therapies. As a systematic review, it also highlights their current states and possible future improvements.

Cancer Vaccines in the Immunotherapy Era: Promise and Potential.

Therapeutic vaccines are a promising alternative for active immunotherapy for different types of cancers. Therapeutic cancer vaccines aim to prevent immune system responses that are not targeted at the tumors only, but also boost the anti-tumor immunity and promote regression or eradication of the malignancy without, or with minimal, adverse events. Clinical trial data have pushed the development of cancer vaccines forward, and the US Food and Drug Administration authorized the first therapeutic cancer vaccine. In the present review, we discuss the various types of cancer vaccines and different approaches for the development of therapeutic cancer vaccines, along with the current state of knowledge and future prospects. We also discuss how tumor-induced immune suppression limits the effectiveness of therapeutic vaccinations, and strategies to overcome this barrier to design efficacious, long-lasting anti-tumor immune responses in the generation of vaccines.

A Comprehensive Review on Cancer Vaccines and Vaccine Strategies in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

HCC, the most prevalent form of primary liver cancer, presents a substantial global health challenge due to its high mortality and limited therapeutic options. This review delves into the potential of cancer vaccines as a novel therapeutic avenue for HCC. We examine the various categories of cancer vaccines, including peptide-based, dendritic cell-based, viral vector-based, DNA, and mRNA vaccines, and their potential application in HCC management. This review also addresses the inherent challenges in vaccine development, such as tumor heterogeneity and the need for identifying tumor-specific antigens. We underscore the role of cancer vaccines in reshaping the immune environment within HCC, fostering durable immune memory, and their potential in combination therapies. The review also evaluates clinical trials and emphasizes the necessity for more extensive research to optimize vaccine design and patient selection criteria. We conclude with future perspectives, highlighting the significance of personalized therapies, innovative antigen delivery platforms, immune modulatory agents, and predictive biomarkers in revolutionizing HCC treatment. Simple Summary: This review explores the potential of cancer vaccines as a promising therapeutic strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a prevalent and deadly liver cancer. The authors discuss various types of cancer vaccines, their challenges, and their role in modulating the immune response within HCC. They also highlight clinical trials and future perspectives, emphasizing the importance of personalized therapies, novel antigen delivery platforms, and predictive biomarkers. The findings from this research could significantly impact the research community by providing a comprehensive understanding of the current state of cancer vaccines for HCC, thereby guiding future research and potentially transforming HCC treatment strategies.

Establishing the applicability of cancer vaccines in combination with chemotherapeutic entities: current aspect and achievable prospects.

Cancer immunotherapy is one of the recently developed cancer treatment modalities. When compared with conventional anticancer drug regimens, immunotherapy has shown significantly better outcomes in terms of quality of life and overall survival. It incorporates a wide range of immunomodulatory modalities that channel the effects of the immune system either by broadly modulating the host immune system or by accurately targeting distinct tumor antigens. One such treatment modality that has gained interest is cancer vaccine therapy which acts by developing antibodies against tumor cells. Cancer vaccines target individual peptides or groups of antigens that are released by tumor cells and presented by the APCs. This also initiates an effective process to activate the host immune responses. Studies on various types of cancer vaccines are conducted, out of which only few are approved by FDA for clinical uses. Despite of documented safety and efficacy of conventional chemotherapy and cancer vaccines, individually they did not produce substantial results in eradication of the cancer as a monotherapy. Hence, the combination approach holds the extensive potential to provide significant improvement in disease outcomes. Certain chemotherapy has immunomodulatory effects and is proven to synergize with cancer vaccines thereby enhancing their anti-tumor activities. Chemotherapeutic agents are known to have immunostimulatory mechanisms apart from its cytotoxic effect and intensify the anti-tumor activities of vaccines by various mechanisms. This review highlights various cancer vaccines, their mechanism, and how their activity gets affected by chemotherapeutic agents. It also aims at summarizing the evidence-based outcome of the combination approach of a cancer vaccine with chemotherapy and a brief on future aspects.

Abstract 685: Engineering semi-allogeneic whole cancer vaccines with enhanced immunogenicity for the treatment of advanced solid tumors

Abstract Background: Therapeutic cancer vaccines are designed to program a patient’s own immune system to recognize and eliminate tumor cells. We sought to harness gene-modified tumor cells as a vaccine platform and developed cancer vaccines composed of breast cancer cells expressing GM-CSF (SV-BR-1-GM). We have recently reported favorable clinical outcomes in patient populations that match SV-BR-1-GM at one or more HLA alleles. Mechanistically, SV-BR-1-GM cells can directly activate CD4+ T-cells in an antigen-specific HLA-restricted manner, as demonstrated by an in vitro antigen presentation assay (1). All these observations led us to hypothesize that semi-allogeneic cell-based cancer vaccines (partially matching host HLA genotype) would mount an enhanced immune response by forcing the host immune response to recognize tumor-associated antigens in the context of allogeneic HLA-I or II molecules or in proximity of strong non-self-antigens. Therefore, steps were taken to generate semi-allogeneic cancer cell lines expressing an extended repertoire of stimulatory molecules to induce optimal immune activation (Bria-OTS). Methods: SV-BR-1 (Breast cancer), PC-3 (prostate cancer), SK-MEL-24 (Melanoma), and NCI-H2228 (Lung cancer) were selected for vaccine development. To generate semi-allogeneic cell lines matching >99% of the population at least at 1 HLA allele, four cell lines (for each parental tumor cell line) were developed, each carrying two (2) HLA-A and two (2) HLA-DRB3/4/5 alleles, for a total of eight HLA-A and seven HLA-DRB3/4/5 alleles. We transduced selected co-stimulatory molecules and immune-modulatory cytokines. Next, the unique combinations of HLA-A and HLA-DRB3/4/5 alleles were transduced into the cells using lentiviral based vectors. Finally, functionality of the engineered cells was validated by using molecular and cellular based assays. Preliminary data: Four cell lines (for each tumor type) that secreted GM-CSF, IFNα, IL12, IL7 and expressed CD80, CD86, 4-1BBL, and different combinations of both Class I and Class II HLA alleles were selected. Using cell-based assays - including mixed lymphocyte reaction assays -, we demonstrated that the generated cells stimulate naïve T-cells. Evaluation of the cells ability to present antigens in an HLA-restricted antigen-specific manner is also planned. Discussion and conclusions: Different types of cancer vaccines have been developed with moderate success, often hampered by lack of strong immunogenicity and complex manufacturing. BriaCell’s Bria OTS provides a solution by increasing vaccine immunogenicity and decreasing manufacturing costs while personalizing the therapy based on matching the patient’s HLA type.1.Lacher MD et al, Front Immunol. 2018 May 15;9:776 Citation Format: Miguel A. Lopez-Lago, Vikas Bhardwaj, Xiaoyi Zheng, Sagarika pachhal, Renee Cortez, Charles Wiseman, William Williams. Engineering semi-allogeneic whole cancer vaccines with enhanced immunogenicity for the treatment of advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 685.

Virus vaccines in cancer immunotherapy: Principles, and Clinical manifestations

Immunotherapy has been of extraordinary significance in cancer treatment. There are many cancer vaccines, and viral vaccines are one type of cancer vaccine. Viral vaccines provide an encouraging solution for the treatment of solid tumors, which cannot be achieved by traditional therapies. Cancer therapy and prevention rely on the availability of virus vaccinations. Existing cancer vaccines have had remarkable success in treatment and prevention. This article summarizes several feasible cancer vaccines and their clinical applications, and analyzes the current limitations and future development of viral vaccines. This article's summary of virus vaccines can provide a helpful reference for future cancer vaccine research.

Cancer vaccines: An unkept promise?

Two decades ago, cancer vaccines were hailed as a prominent breakthrough for the treatment of cancer. However, the vaccines failed to show any improvement in median survival time in various clinical trials, even though they stimulated the immune response and showed exceptional safety profiles. The resistance of cancer cells to the immune response was revealed as a significant hurdle. In this review, I discuss the different types of cancer vaccines and the strategies used to design them. I also highlight how cancer cells develop resistance to the immune response, and how therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and small interfering (si)RNA/short hairpin (sh)RNA could be used to address some of the shortcomings of cancer vaccine treatments.

Nanoscale Coordination Polymer Based Nanovaccine for Tumor Immunotherapy.

Tumor vaccines to induce robust immunity for cancer treatment have attracted tremendous interests in cancer immunotherapy. In this work, a type of cancer vaccine is prepared by using nanoscale coordination polymer (NCP) formed between Mn2+ ions and a nucleotide oligomerization binding domain 1 (Nod1) agonist, meso-2,6-diaminopimelic acid (DAP), as the organic ligand, to encapsulate a model protein antigen, ovalbumin (OVA). The obtained OVA@Mn-DAP nanoparticles could act as an effective tumor vaccine to promote the maturation of dendritic cells (DCs) as well as their antigen cross-presentation via increasing the cellular uptake of antigen and stimulating Nod1 pathway with DAP. Such OVA@Mn-DAP vaccine could migrate into lymph nodes after local injection, as revealed by in vivo magnetic resonance (MR) and fluorescence imaging. Importantly, vaccination with OVA@Mn-DAP could not only offer prophylactic to protect mice from challenged B16-OVA tumors but also result in significant therapeutic effect to inhibit growth of already-established tumors if in combination with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody (α-PD-1) immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Therefore, this work presents an innovative platform to construct effective nanovaccine for tumor immunotherapy.

Cell-Penetrating Peptide Enhanced Antigen Presentation for Cancer Immunotherapy.

The development of effective cancer vaccines is an important direction in the area of cancer immunotherapy. Although certain types of preventive cancer vaccines have already been used in the clinic, therapeutic cancer vaccines for treatment of already established tumors are still in high demand. In this study, we develop a new type of cancer vaccine by mixing cell-penetrating peptide (CPP) conjugated antigen as the enhanced antigen, together with CpG as the immune adjuvant. A special CPP, cytosol-localizing internalization peptide 6 (CLIP6), which has the ability to enter cells exclusively via a nonendosomal mechanism, i.e., direct translocation across the cell membrane, is conjugated with model antigen ovalbumin (OVA). Compared to naked OVA, the obtained CLIP6-OVA conjugates show greatly increased uptake by dendritic cells (DCs) and, more importantly, remarkably enhanced antigen cross-presentation, eliciting stronger cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) mediated immune responses with the help of CpG. This CLIP6-OVA/CpG formulation offers effective protection for mice against challenged B16-OVA tumors, and is able to further function as a therapeutic vaccine, which, in combination with immune checkpoint blockade therapy, can significantly suppress the already-established tumors. Such a CLIP6-based cancer vaccine developing strategy shows promising potential toward clinical practice owing to its features of easy preparation, low cost, and remarkable biocompatibility.

A New Approach for Cancer Immunotherapy Based on the Cancer Stem Cell Antigens Properties.

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are a rare population of tumor cells, which play an important role in tumor initiation, progression, and maintenance. The concept that cancer cells arise from stem cells was presented about 150 years ago. Recently, this hypothesis was renewed considering the heterogeneity of tumor cells. CSCs are resistant to chemo- and radio-therapy. Therefore, targeting CSCs could be a novel and effective strategy to struggle with tumor cells. In this mini-review, we highlight that different immunotherapeutic approaches can be used to target cancer cells and eradicate different tumor cells. The most important targets are specific markers recognized on the CSC surface as CSC antigens such as CD44, CD133, Aldehyde Dehydrogenase (ALDH), and SOX family members. This article emphasizes recent advances in CSCs in cancer therapy. Our results present that CSC antigens play an important role in tumor initiation, especially in the cells that are resistant to chemo- and radiotherapy agents. Therefore, they are ideal targets for cancer immunotherapy, for instance, in developing different types of cancer vaccines or antibodies against tumor cells. The current studies related to cancer immunotherapy through targeting the CSC antigens based on their properties are briefly summarized. Altogether, CSC antigens can be efficiently targeted to treat cancer patients.

Dendritic Cell Targeting Vaccine for HPV-Associated Cancer

Dendritic cells (DCs) are major antigen presenting cells that can efficiently prime and activate cellular immune responses. Delivering antigens to in vivo DCs has thus been considered as a promising strategy that could allow us to mount T cell-mediated therapeutic immunity against cancers in patients. Successful development of such types of cancer vaccines that can target in vivo DCs, however, requires a series of outstanding questions that need to be addressed. These include the proper selection of which DC surface receptors, specific DC subsets and DC activators that can further enhance the efficacy of vaccines by promoting effector T cell infiltration and retention in tumors and their actions against tumors. Supplementing these areas of research with additional strategies that can counteract tumor immune evasion mechanisms is also expected to enhance the efficacy of such therapeutic vaccines against cancers. After more than a decade of study, we have concluded that antigen targeting to DCs via CD40 to evoke cellular responses is more efficient than targeting antigens to the same types of DCs via eleven other DC surface receptors tested. In recent work, we have further demonstrated that a prototype vaccine (anti-CD40-HPV16.E6/7, a recombinant fusion protein of anti-human CD40 and HPV16.E6/7 protein) for HPV16-associated cancers can efficiently activate HPV16.E6/7-specific T cells, particularly CD8+ T cells, from the blood of HPV16+ head-and-neck cancer patients. Moreover, anti-CD40-HPV16.E6/7 plus poly(I:C) can mount potent therapeutic immunity against TC-1 tumor expressing HPV16.E6/7 protein in human CD40 transgenic mice. In this manuscript, we thus highlight our recent findings for the development of novel CD40 targeting immunotherapeutic vaccines for HPV16-associated malignancies. In addition, we further discuss several of key questions that still remain to be addressed for enhancing therapeutic immunity elicited by our prototype vaccine against HPV16-associated malignancies.

Cyclooxygenase Inhibition in Cancer Immunotherapy: Combination of Indomethacin with Cancer Vaccines Is Not Always Beneficial

Cyclooxygenase (COX)-1, but preferable COX-2 catalyzes the synthesis of PGE2 in several tumors, promoting angiogenesis and a suppressive inflammation in their microenvironments. Different types of cancer vaccines have been combined with COX-2 inhibitors, assuming that its particular mechanism of action will not influence the overall results of the combination. In this research, a possible relationship between the type of cancer vaccine and the outcome of the combination with a COX inhibitor was experimentally addressed. We investigated whether nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) affect the immune response to vaccination. Three adjuvants were evaluated for humoral and cellular response using ovalbumin (OVA) as antigen. We evaluated also the impact of indomethacin in five tumor models and the correlation of this effect with the secretion of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) of these cells. We finally studied the combination of indomethacin with two cancer vaccines in three different experimental settings. COX inhibitor did not interfere with dendritic cells maturation in vitro and did not affect the frequency of splenic immune cell populations in mice. However, the induction of OVA-specific antibodies is affected by the COX inhibitor but its impact on cytotoxic CD8+ T cell response is adjuvant-dependent. In contrast, the antitumor effect of the COX inhibitor in the 3LL-D122 tumor model is not mediated by CD4+ or CD8+ T cells. Interestingly, the in vivo effect observed in this model and others didn’t correlate with levels of PGE2 secretion by the tumor cell lines in vitro. Finally, the combination of a COX inhibitor with cancer vaccines may depend on the type of the cancer vaccine.

Cancer Vaccines: Past, Present, and Future.

Cancer is a common and potentially deadly disease. Some of the cancers may be difficult to treat by conventional means such as surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, but may be controlled by the stimulation of the immune response of the body with the help of cancer vaccines. The use of vaccines for preventing infections by oncogenic viruses such as hepatitis B virus and human papilloma virus has been extremely successful in reducing the incidence of cancers resulting from these infections. The use of vaccines for treating cancers that are not due to viral infections and that are already established is currently the object of numerous clinical trials. Several types of cancer vaccines are being tried. These include antigen vaccines, tumor cell vaccines, dendritic vaccines, deoxyribonucleic acid vaccines, and viral vector vaccines. The development of these therapeutic vaccines is proving difficult with only 1 recent success. However, there is significant enthusiasm and optimism regarding the development of effective therapeutic vaccines stemming from the fact that our understanding regarding the cancer immunology is considerably enhanced in recent years. This expanded knowledge regarding the mechanisms that cancers use to escape the immune system is likely to open new avenues in modulating the immune response to cancer, thus enhancing the effectiveness of therapeutic cancer vaccines.

Induction of a tumour-specific CTL response by exosomes isolated from heat-treated malignant ascites of gastric cancer patients

Purpose: Tumour cell-derived exosomes may represent a novel type of cancer vaccine. However, the immunogenicity of exosomes derived from tumour cells has been shown to be poor. Therefore, in this study, exosome immunogenicity following heat treatment of exosomes from malignant ascites obtained from gastric cancer patients was evaluated.Materials and methods: Tumour-derived exosomes were isolated from heat-treated and untreated malignant ascites of gastric cancer patients using serial centrifugation and sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation. Next, in vitro experiments were performed to investigate the influence of heat treatment on exosome immunogenicity.Results: Exosomes from heat-treated malignant ascites of gastric cancer patients (HS exosomes) were found to contain higher concentrations of heat shock proteins, Hsp70 and Hsp60, than exosomes derived from untreated malignant ascites obtained from gastric cancer patients. Additional in vitro studies suggest that exosomes derived from heat-treated malignant ascites are able to promote dendritic cell (DC) maturation and induce a tumour-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response.Conclusions: Overall, these results demonstrate that exposure to heat stress can improve the immunogenicity of exosomes obtained from malignant ascites of gastric cancer patients.

Recent Advances in Cancer Vaccines: An Overview

The field of cancer vaccines is currently in an active state of clinical investigations. Human papilloma virus vaccine has been approved as a prophylactic cancer vaccine, while Oncophage (heat shock protein-peptide complex) was recently approved in Russia for a certain stage of kidney cancer, although to date none has been approved in Japan or the USA. We reviewed recent clinical trials of several different types of cancer vaccines, mainly by using PubMed from 2005 to 2008. There have been slow but substantial advances in peptide vaccines and dendritic cell-based vaccines with regard to both clinical responses and immunological markers. A personalized approach to boost immune responses, addition of chemotherapy to overcome robust cancers and changing of endpoints from tumor reduction to overall survival seem to be the three key elements for the development of therapeutic cancer vaccines.

Specific Active Immunotherapy of Cancer: Potential and Perspectives

Extensive research over the past two decades in tumor immunology has shown that immune reactivity to tumor antigens can restrict tumor growth and/or metastasis, especially when tumor burden is low. These observations in experimental models have been translated into clinical studies involving both active and passive forms of immunotherapies. While immune responses to specific tumor antigens can be detected in patients with various types of cancers, responses to any single antigen seldom correlate directly with a clinical response to tumors; however, some clinical regressions of solid tumors have been reported with certain types of cancer vaccines. While passive immunotherapies with antibody to tumor antigens (Avastin, Herceptin, Erbitux, Rituxan, Bexxar) are being used to treat selected types of cancers, active immunotherapies may be better suited to potentially elicit a sustained immune response, particularly when administered in an adjuvant setting. This review covers the potential and issues with specific active immunotherapies (SAI) for the treatment of cancer.

More Efficient Induction of HLA-A*0201-Restricted and Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA)–Specific CTL Response by Immunization with Exosomes Prepared from Heat-Stressed CEA-Positive Tumor Cells

Tumor-derived exosomes are proposed as a new type of cancer vaccine. Heat shock proteins are potent Th1 adjuvant, and heat stress can induce heat shock protein and MHC-I expression in tumor cells, leading to the increased immunogenicity of tumor cells. To improve the immunogenicity of exosomes as cancer vaccine, we prepared exosomes from heat-stressed carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-positive tumor cells (CEA+/HS-Exo) and tested the efficacy of these exosomes in the induction of CEA-specific antitumor immunity. First, we identified the composition of CEA+/HS-Exo and observed their effects on human dendritic cell maturation. Then, we evaluated their ability to induce a CEA-specific immune response in vivo in HLA-A2.1/Kb transgenic mice and CEA-specific CTL response in vitro in HLA-A*0201+ healthy donors and HLA-A*0201+CEA+ cancer patients. CEA+/HS-Exo contained CEA and more heat shock protein 70 and MHC-I and significantly induced dendritic cell maturation. Immunization of HLA-A2.1/Kb transgenic mice with CEA+/HS-Exo was more efficient in priming a CEA-specific CTL, and the CTL showed antitumor effect when adoptively transferred to SW480-bearing nude mice. Moreover, in vitro incubation of lymphocytes from HLA-A*0201+ healthy donors and HLA-A*0201+CEA+ cancer patients with CEA+/HS-Exo-pulsed autologous dendritic cells induces HLA-A*0201-restricted and CEA-specific CTL response. Our results show that CEA+/HS-Exo has superior immunogenicity than CEA+/Exo in inducing CEA-specific CTL response and suggest that exosomes derived from heat-stressed tumor cells may be used as efficient vaccine for cancer immunotherapy.