While previous stuttering research has successfully revealed areas vulnerable to disfluency at the word level in stuttering, identifying the specific factors responsible for this instability has proved difficult; moreover, inconsistent results are complicated by a failure to control for the effects of phrasal prosody, which govern such word-level factors as lexical stress. The present experiment tested the hypothesis that disfluencies in stuttering are directly proportional to the prominence-level of a given production. Three stuttering subjects participated in an oral sentence-reading task testing a variety of sentence types while manipulating intonational factors such as pitch accent type and location. It was anticipated that pitch-accented syllables, representing a higher degree of stress in an intonation phrase than stressed but non-pitch-accented syllables, would be most prone to triggering disfluency, since they bear a greater level of prominence in the utterance. The results of the study confirmed the major hypothesis: in all of the comparisons between pitch-accented and non-pitch-accented positions of stress, the former attracted the highest rate of disfluent speech productions. This supports the principal hypothesis that intonationally prominent domains, not simply lexically stressed syllables, are a better indicator of unstable positions in stuttered speech.
Read full abstract