Types Of Electrode Arrays Research Articles

Experimental study of micro-prismatic electrode array wear during EDM and application to the preparation of microcylindrical electrode array

The focus of this study is to compare the wear characteristics of different types of micro-prismatic electrode array during EDM, and to propose a method for preparing microcylindrical electrode array based on micro-prismatic electrode array. Firstly, the characteristic of the micro-prismatic electrode that the front cross-section becomes circular after wear during EDM is clarified, and the wear form of the micro-prismatic electrode is analyzed. Then, the laws of the influence of electrode shape (triangle, square, hexagon), electrode material (pure copper, copper-tungsten alloy, pure tungsten), electrode size (200 μm, 300 μm, 400 μm) on the wear characteristics of the micro-prismatic electrode array, including the length of the wear of each part of the electrodes, the length of the area of the front cross-section that becomes rounded, the consistency of the wear of the electrode array, the machining efficiency, and electrode wear rate are summarized. After that, the process of changing the electrode array from square columns to cylinders using the new method is given, which confirms the feasibility of the method. Finally, the effects of peak current and pulse width on the size, machining efficiency, surface roughness, and surface micro-morphology of micro-cylindrical electrode array prepared by the new method are summarized. This study is of great significance for achieving mass production of microcylindrical electrode array.

Intra-Cochlear Electrode Position Impacts the Preservation of Residual Hearing in an Animal Model of Cochlear Implant Surgery.

Preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation remains challenging. There are several approaches to preserve residual hearing, but the configuration of the implant electrode array seems to play a major role. Lateral wall electrode arrays are seemingly more favorable in this context. To date, there are no experimental data available which correlate the spatial electrode position in the scala tympani with the extent of hearing preservation. Based on micro-computed tomography (µCT) imaging data, this study analyses the exact position of a pure silicone electrode array inserted into the cochlea of four guinea pigs. Array position data were correlated with the extent of hearing loss after implantation, measured using auditory brainstem measurements in the frequency range of the area occupied by the electrode array area as well as apical to the array. The use of pure silicone arrays without electrodes resulted in artifact-free, high-resolution µCT images that allowed precise determination of the arrays' positions within the scala tympani. The electrode arrays' locations ranged from peri-modiolar to an anti-modiolar. These revealed a correlation of a lower postoperative hearing loss with a higher spatial proximity to the lateral wall. This correlation was found in the low-frequency range only. A significant correlation between the inter-individual differences in the diameter of the scala tympani and the postoperative hearing loss could not be observed. This study demonstrates the importance of the intra-cochlear electrode array's position for the preservation of residual hearing. The advantage of such an electrode array's position approximated to the lateral wall suggests, at least for this type of electrode array applied in the guinea pig, it would be advantageous in the preservation of residual hearing for the apical part of the cochlea, beyond the area occupied by the electrode array.

Automatic localization of cochlear implant electrodes using cone beam computed tomography images

BackgroundCochlear implants (CI) are implantable medical devices that enable the perception of sounds and the understanding of speech by electrically stimulating the auditory nerve in case of inner ear damage. The stimulation takes place via an array of electrodes surgically inserted in the cochlea. After CI implantation, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is used to evaluate the position of the electrodes. Moreover, CBCT is used in research studies to investigate the relationship between the position of the electrodes and the hearing outcome of CI user. In clinical routine, the estimation of the position of the CI electrodes is done manually, which is very time-consuming.ResultsThe aim of this study was to optimize procedures of automatic electrode localization from CBCT data following CI implantation. For this, we analyzed the performance of automatic electrode localization for 150 CBCT data sets of 10 different types of electrode arrays. Our own implementation of the method by Noble and Dawant (Lecture notes in computer science (Including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics), Springer, pp 152–159, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24571-3_19) for automated electrode localization served as a benchmark for evaluation. Differences in the detection rate and the localization accuracy across types of electrode arrays were evaluated and errors were classified. Based on this analysis, we developed a strategy to optimize procedures of automatic electrode localization. It was shown that particularly distantly spaced electrodes in combination with a deep insertion can lead to apical–basal confusions in the localization procedure. This confusion prevents electrodes from being detected or assigned correctly, leading to a deterioration in localization accuracy.ConclusionsWe propose an extended cost function for automatic electrode localization methods that prevents double detection of electrodes to avoid apical–basal confusions. This significantly increased the detection rate by 11.15 percent points and improved the overall localization accuracy by 0.53 mm (1.75 voxels). In comparison to other methods, our proposed cost function does not require any prior knowledge about the individual cochlea anatomy.

Impact of surgical approach and cochlear implant electrode on structural integrity of the cochlea

Cochlear implants have been used for many years as a rehabilitation device for people with severe to profound hearing loss. Essential aspects of successful cochlear implantation are the choice of electrode type and proper insertion of the electrode array into the tympanic ladder to minimize damage to the cochlea. This article discusses the impact of surgical approaches, such as round window, cochleostomy, and extended round window, and the type of electrode array (perimodiolar or lateral wall) on scalar translocation.

Cochlear-facial dehiscence – the most common cause of facial nerve stimulation from a cochlear implant? A case–control study

Objectives To investigate the prevalence of cochlear-facial dehiscence (CFD) and other radiographical pathologies in ears with facial nerve stimulation (FNS) from a cochlear implant (CI). Methods Retrospective case–control study of 27 patients with CI and FNS on either ear (study group) and 27 patients without FNS, matched for age, sex and type of electrode array (control group). Preoperative CT scans of all 108 ears were re-evaluated. Subanalyses included comparisons between the study and control groups and associations between FNS and radiographic pathologies. Results CFDs were detected in 20 of 54 ears (37%) in the study group and in 3 of 54 ears (6%) in the control group (P < 0.001). The corresponding numbers of otosclerosis were 10 (18%) and 0 (P = 0.011) and of developmental anomalies 16 (30%) and 8 (15%) (not significant). FNS was present in 33 ears in the study group, of which 14 (42%) had a CFD. FNS was absent in six ears with CFD and CI, four of which contralateral to an ear with FNS. Eight of 14 ears with FNS and CFD had a lateral electrode array and six had a perimodiolar electrode array. We found no association between the presence of CFD and stimulation thresholds for FNS. The adjusted odds ratio for developing FNS in the presence of a CFD was 9.9 (95% CI 2.7–36.0). Conclusions CFD was the most common radiographic pathology in ears with FNS, with a 10-fold increased risk of FNS. To avoid CI-related FNS, preoperative CT scan and awareness of typical dehiscence symptoms are strongly recommended.

The association between electrode impedance and short-term outcomes in cochlear implant recipients of slim modiolar and slim straight electrode arrays

Objectives Electrode impedance measurements from cochlear implants (CI) reflect the status of the electrode array as well as the surrounding cochlear environment, and could provide a clinical index of functional changes with the CI. The goals of this study were to examine (1) the impact of electrode array type on electrode impedance, and (2) the relationship between electrode impedance and short-term hearing preservation and speech recognition outcomes. Methods Retrospective study of 115 adult hearing preservation CI recipients of a slim modiolar or slim straight array. Common ground electrode impedances, pre- and post-operative hearing thresholds and CNC word recognition scores were retrieved. Results Electrode impedances were significantly higher for recipients of the straight electrode array. Within individuals, electrode impedances were stable after the first week post-activation. However, increased standard deviation of electrode impedances was associated with greater loss of low frequency hearing at initial activation, and with poorer speech recognition at 6 months post-implantation. Conclusions Results demonstrate that electrode impedances depend on the type of implanted array. Findings also suggest that there may be a role for the variability in electrode impedance across electrodes as an indicator of changes in the intracochlear environment that contribute to outcomes with a CI.

Hearing Performance in Cochlear Implant Users Who Have Facial Nerve Stimulation.

Introduction Facial nerve stimulation (FNS) is a complication in cochlear implant (CI) when the electrical current escapes from the cochlea to the nearby facial nerve. Different management to reduce its effects are available, although changes might result in a less-than-ideal fitting for the CI user, eventually reducing speech perception. Objective To verify the etiologies that cause FNS, to identify strategies in managing FNS, and to evaluate speech recognition in patients who present FNS. Methods Retrospective study approved by the Ethical Board of the Institution. From the files of a CI group, patients who were identified with FNS either during surgery or at any time postoperatively were selected. Data collection included: CI manufacturer, electrode array type, age at implantation, etiology of hearing loss, FNS identification date, number of electrodes that generated FNS, FNS management actions, and speech recognition in quiet and in noise. Results Data were collected from 7 children and 25 adults. Etiologies that cause FNS were cochlear malformation, head trauma, meningitis, and otosclerosis; the main actions included decrease in the stimulation levels followed by the deactivation of electrodes. Average speech recognition in quiet before FNS was 86% and 80% after in patients who were able to accomplish the test. However, there was great variability, ranging from 0% in quiet to 90% of speech recognition in noise. Conclusion Etiologies that cause FNS are related to cochlear morphology alterations. Facial nerve stimulation can be solved using speech processor programming parameters; however, it is not possible to predict outcomes, since results depend on other variables.

Evaluation of the Performance of OTOPLAN-Based Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Selection: A Retrospective Study.

Otoplan is a surgical planning software designed to assist with cochlear implant surgery. One of its outputs is a recommendation of electrode array type based on imaging parameters. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the differences in auditory outcomes between patients who were implanted with arrays corresponding to those recommended by the Otoplan software versus those in which the array selection differed from the Otoplan recommendation. Pre-operative CT images from 114 patients were imported into the software, and array recommendations were generated. These were compared to the arrays which had actually been implanted during surgery, both in terms of array type and length. As recommended, 47% of patients received the same array, 34% received a shorter array, and 18% received a longer array. For reasons relating to structure and hearing preservation, 83% received the more flexible arrays. Those who received stiffer arrays had cochlear malformations or ossification. A negative, although non-statistically significant correlation was observed between the CNC scores at 12 months and the absolute value of the difference between recommended array and implanted array. In conclusion, clinicians may be slightly biased toward shorter electrode arrays due to their perceived greater ability to achieve full insertion. Using 3D imaging during the pre-operative planning may improve clinicians' confidence to implant longer electrode arrays, where appropriate, to achieve optimum hearing outcomes.

Auditory outcomes after scala vestibuli array insertion are similar to those after scala tympani insertion 1year after cochlear implantation.

In cochlear implantation, a scala vestibuli (SV) insertion of an electrode array is a rare occurrence and is reported to be linked to poor hearing outcomes. Using the same electrode array, the auditory performance of patients with a complete SV location was compared with that of patients having a complete scala tympani (ST) location 1year after implantation. Thirty-three patients were included in this retrospective case-control study (SV, n = 12; ST, n = 21). The matching criteria were electrode array type, age at implantation, and duration of severe or profound deafness. The array location was analyzed using 3D reconstruction of postoperative CT scans. Postoperative audiological evaluation of the implanted ear was performed using pure-tone audiometry, speech recognition of monosyllabic words in quiet, and words and sentences in noise. On the preoperative CT scan, six patients in the SV group presented with both round window (RW) and ST ossification, three with RW ossification alone, and three with no RW ossification. Auditory performance did not differ between SV and ST groups 1year after cochlear implantation. Speech recognition of words was 49 ± 7.6% and 56 ± 5.0% in quiet and 75 ± 9.5% and 66 ± 6.0% in noise in SV and ST groups, respectively. ST insertion is the gold standard that allows the three cochlear scalae to preserve scalar cochlear integrity. However, 1year after implantation, a planned or unexpected SV insertion is not detrimental to hearing outcomes, providing similar auditory performance in quiet and noise to ST insertion.

Features of processor fitting in patients with different types of cochlear implant electrode array

Introduction. The results of cochlear implantation in patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss are influenced by many factors, including the type of electrode array. The location of the electrodes in relation to neurons of spiral ganglion affects on levels of perception of the patient's hearing sensations.Aim. To evaluate the dependence of electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) thresholds values and comfortable levels depends on electrode array type.Materials and methods. 26 patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss with cochlear implantation systems were examined. The patients were divided into 2 groups: 1) patients with a straight electrode array (n = 14); 2) patients with a perimodiolar electrode array (n = 12). We tested speech intelligibility and ECAP thresholds. The difference in the values of both parameters was estimated.Results. For both groups of patients, the relationship between the threshold's profiles of ECAP thresholds and maximum comfortable stimulation levels was detected. For patients from the first group (straight electrode array), the differences in values between the studied parameters were 30.6 ± 6.1%. In patients from the second group, the differences in the values of the thresholds for ECAP thresholds and the levels of comfortable stimulation ranged 2.4 ± 2.1%.Conclusion. The perimodiolar electrode array is located closer to the neurons of the spiral ganglion, which may explain the greater relationship between the values of the ECAP thresholds and the levels of comfortable stimulation. This pattern must be considered when programming the processor of the cochlear implantation system.

A State-of-the-Art Method for Preserving Residual Hearing During Cochlear Implant Surgery.

The developments in surgical techniques and cochlear implant (CI) electrode design have expanded the indications for CI treatment. Currently, patients with high-frequency hearing loss may benefit from CIs when low-frequency residual hearing can be preserved, as this enables combined electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS). The possible benefits of EAS include, for example, improved sound quality, music perception, and speech intelligibility in noise. The risks of inner ear trauma and a deterioration or even complete loss of residual hearing vary according to the surgical technique and the type of electrode array used. Short, lateral-wall electrodes with shallower angular insertion depths have demonstrated higher rates of hearing preservation than longer electrodes. The very slow insertion of the electrode array through the round window of the cochlea contributes to insertion atraumaticity and, thus, may lead to favorable hearing preservation results. However, residual hearing can be lost even after an atraumatic insertion. Electrocochleography (ECochG) can be used to monitor inner ear hair cell function during the insertion of the electrode. Several investigators have demonstrated that the ECochG responses during surgery may predict postoperative hearing preservation results. In a recent study, we correlated the patients' subjective hearing perception with simultaneously recorded intracochlear ECochG responses during the insertion. This is the first report evaluating the association between intraoperative ECochG responses and hearing perception in a subject undergoing cochlear implantation under local anesthesia without sedation. The combination of intraoperative ECochG responses with the patient's real-time feedback to sound stimuli has excellent sensitivity for the intraoperative monitoring of cochlear function. This paper presents a state-of-the-art method for the preservation of residual hearing during CI surgery. We describe this treatment procedure with the special consideration of performing the surgery under local anesthesia, which makes it feasible for monitoring the patient's hearing during the insertion of the electrode array.

Histopathological reaction in the vestibule after cochlear implantation in Macaca fascicularis.

Cochlear implantation surgery (CI) is considered a safe procedure and is the standard treatment for the auditory rehabilitation in patients with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss. Although the development of minimally traumatic surgical concepts (MTSC) have enabled the preservation of residual hearing after the implantation, there is scarce literature regarding the vestibular affection following MTCS.The aim of the study is to analyze histopathologic changes in the vestibule after CI in an animal model (Macaca fascicularis). Cochlear implantation was performed successfully in 14 ears following MTCS. They were classified in two groups upon type of electrode array used. Group A (n = 6) with a FLEX 28 electrode array and Group B (n = 8) with HL14 array. A 6-month follow-up was carried out with periodic objective auditory testing. After their sacrifice, histological processing and subsequent analysis was carried out. Intracochlear findings, vestibular presence of fibrosis, obliteration or collapse is analyzed. Saccule and utricle dimensions and neuroepithelium width is measured.Cochlear implantation was performed successfully in all 14 ears through a round window approach. Mean angle of insertion was >270° for group A and 180–270° for group B. In group A auditory deterioration was observed in Mf 1A, Mf2A and Mf5A with histopathological signs of scala tympani ossification, saccule collapse (Mf1A and Mf2A) and cochlear aqueduct obliteration (Mf5A). Besides, signs of endolymphatic sinus dilatation was seen for Mf2B and Mf5A. Regarding group B, no auditory deterioration was observed. Histopathological signs of endolymphatic sinus dilatation were seen in Mf 2B and Mf 8B.In conclusion, the risk of histological damage of the vestibular organs following minimally traumatic surgical concepts and the soft surgery principles is very low. CI surgery is a safe procedure and it can be done preserving the vestibular structures.

Spread of the intracochlear electrical field: Implications for assessing electrode array location in cochlear implantation

The electrode-generated intracochlear electrical field (EF) spreads widely along the scala tympani surrounded by poorly-conducting tissue and it can be measured with monopolar transimpedance matrix (TIMmp). Bipolar TIM (TIMbp) allows estimations of local potential differences. With TIMmp, the correct alignment of the electrode array can be assessed, and TIMbp may be useful in more subtle evaluations of the electrode array's intracochlear location. In this temporal bone study, we investigated the effect of the cross-sectional scala area (SA) and the electrode-medial-wall distance (EMWD) on both TIMmp and TIMbp using three types of electrode arrays. Also, multiple linear regressions based on the TIMmp and TIMbp measurements were used to estimate the SA and EMWD.Six cadaver temporal bones were consecutively implanted with a lateral-wall electrode array (Slim Straight) and with two different precurved perimodiolar electrode arrays (Contour Advance and Slim Modiolar) for variation in EMWD. The bones were imaged with cone-beam computed tomography with simultaneous TIMmp and TIMbp measurements. The results from imaging and EF measurements were compared.SA increased from apical to basal direction (r = 0.96, p < 0.001). Intracochlear EF peak negatively correlated with SA (r = –0.55, p < 0.001) irrespective of the EMWD. The rate of the EF decay did not correlate with SA but it was faster in the proximity of the medial wall than in more lateral positions (r = 0.35, p < 0.001). For a linear comparison between the EF decaying proportionally to squared distance and anatomic dimensions, a square root of inverse TIMbp was applied and found to be affected by both SA and EMWD (r = 0.44 and r = 0.49, p < 0.001 for both). A regression model confirmed that together TIMmp and TIMbp can be used to estimate both SA and EMWD (R2 = 0.47 and R2 = 0.44, respectively, p < 0.001 for both).In TIMmp, EF peaks grow from basal to apical direction and EF decay is steeper in the proximity of the medial wall than in more lateral positions. Local potentials measured via TIMbp correlate with both SA and EMWD. Altogether, TIMmp and TIMbp can be used to assess the intracochlear and intrascalar position of the electrode array, and they may reduce the need for intra- and postoperative imaging in the future.

An Accurate and Individualized Preoperative Estimation Method for the Linear Insertion Depth of Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays Based on Computed Tomography.

Cochlear implantation or auditory brainstem implantation is currently the only accepted method for improving severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss. The length of the electrodes implanted during cochlear implantation is closely related to the degree of hearing improvement of hearing after the surgery. We aimed to explore new methods to accurately estimate the electrode array (EA) linear insertion depth based on computed tomography (CT) images prior surgery, which could help surgeons select the appropriate EA length for each patient. Previous studies estimated the linear insertion depth by measuring the length of the lateral wall of the cochlea rather than the electrode's path in the cochlea duct. Here, we determined the actual position of the EA on the CT image after cochlear surgery in order to predict the path of the EA, and the length of the predicted EA path was measured by the contouring technique (CoT) to estimate the linear insertion depth of the EA. Because CoT can only measure the length of the estimated EA path on a two-dimensional plane, we further modified the measurement by weighting the height of the cochlea and the length of the EA tail (the length of the last stimulating electrode to the end, which cannot be displayed on the CT image), which we termed the modified CoT + height + tail (MCHT) measurement. Based on our established method, MCHT could reduce the error to the submillimeter range (0.67 ± 0.37 mm) when estimating the linear insertion depth of various kinds of EAs compared with the actual implant length. The correlation coefficient between the linear insertion depth as predicted by MCHT and the actual was 0.958. The linear insertion depth estimated by this method was more accurate than that estimated using the classical CoT technique ( R = 0.442) and using the modified Escudé's method ( R = 0.585). MCHT is a method based on CT images that can accurately predict the linear insertion depth of cochlear implants preoperatively. This is the first report that we are aware of a method for predicting linear insertion depth before cochlear implantation with only submillimeter errors and that is tailored to different types of EAs.

Intraoperative Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Growth and Maximum Amplitudes in Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Electrically evoked compound action potentials (eCAPs) obtained from cochlear implant (CI) recipients reflect responsiveness of the auditory nerve to electrical stimulation. The recent use of atraumatic electrode arrays and expansion of CI candidacy to listeners with greater residual hearing may lead to increased clinical utility of intraoperative eCAP recordings. To examine the effect of electrode array (slim modiolar versus slim straight) on suprathreshold intraoperative eCAP recordings in hearing preservation CI recipients. A secondary goal was to examine potential clinical applications of intraoperative eCAPs for predicting immediate hearing preservation and speech perception outcomes. Retrospective study of 113 adult hearing preservation CI candidates implanted from 2015 to 2019 with either a slim modiolar or slim straight electrode array. Intraoperative eCAP growth functions and maximum amplitudes were obtained at several intracochlear electrodes and examined as a function of implanted array and hearing preservation status, while controlling for electrode impedance. From basal to apical electrodes, progressively larger eCAP amplitudes and steeper slopes were recorded. Steeper eCAP slopes at apical electrodes were also seen for recipients of the slim modiolar array (versus slim straight). Suprathreshold eCAP responses did not differ as a function of hearing preservation and were not associated with speech recognition. More robust eCAP responses were obtained from apical electrodes, which is consistent with better low-frequency thresholds in hearing preservation recipients. This effect was compounded by type of electrode array. Results also suggest that intraoperative, suprathreshold eCAPs cannot be used to predict the success of hearing preservation surgery or performance with the CI.

A Unified Deep-Learning-Based Framework for Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Localization.

Cochlear implants (CIs) are neuroprosthetics that can provide a sense of sound to people with severe-to-profound hearing loss. A CI contains an electrode array (EA) that is threaded into the cochlea during surgery. Recent studies have shown that hearing outcomes are correlated with EA placement. An image-guided cochlear implant programming technique is based on this correlation and utilizes the EA location with respect to the intracochlear anatomy to help audiologists adjust the CI settings to improve hearing. Automated methods to localize EA in postoperative CT images are of great interest for large-scale studies and for translation into the clinical workflow. In this work, we propose a unified deep-learning-based framework for automated EA localization. It consists of a multi-task network and a series of postprocessing algorithms to localize various types of EAs. The evaluation on a dataset with 27 cadaveric samples shows that its localization error is slightly smaller than the state-of-the-art method. Another evaluation on a large-scale clinical dataset containing 561 cases across two institutions demonstrates a significant improvement in robustness compared to the state-of-the-art method. This suggests that this technique could be integrated into the clinical workflow and provide audiologists with information that facilitates the programming of the implant leading to improved patient care.

Virtual cochlear implantation for personalized rehabilitation of profound hearing loss

In cochlear implantation, current preoperative planning procedures allow for estimating how far a specific implant will reach into the inner ear of the patient, which is important to optimize hearing preservation and speech perception outcomes. Here we report on the development of a methodology that goes beyond current planning approaches: the proposed model does not only estimate specific outcome parameters but allows for entire, three-dimensional virtual implantations of patient-specific cochlear anatomies with different types of electrode arrays. The model was trained based on imaging datasets of 186 human cochleae, which contained 171 clinical computer tomographies (CTs) of actual cochlear implant patients as well as 15 high-resolution micro-CTs of cadaver cochleae to also reconstruct the refined intracochlear structures not visible in clinical imaging. The model was validated on an independent dataset of 141 preoperative and postoperative clinical CTs of cochlear implant recipients and outperformed all currently available planning approaches, not only in terms of accuracy but also regarding the amount of information that is available prior to the actual implantation.

Relationship between electrode position and temporal modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant users: Are close electrodes always better?

Temporal modulation sensitivity has been studied extensively for cochlear implant (CI) users due to its strong correlation to speech recognition outcomes. Previous studies reported that temporal modulation detection thresholds (MDTs) vary across the tonotopic axis and attributed this variation to patchy neural survival. However, correlates of neural health identified in animal models depend on electrode position in humans. Nonetheless, the relationship between MDT and electrode location has not been explored. We tested 13 ears for the effect of distance on modulation sensitivity, specifically targeting the question of whether electrodes closer to the modiolus are universally beneficial. Participants in this study were postlingually deafened and users of Cochlear Nucleus CIs. The distance of each electrode from the medial wall (MW) of the cochlea and mid-modiolar axis (MMA) was measured from scans obtained using computerized tomography (CT) imaging. The distance measures were correlated with slopes of spatial tuning curves measured on selected electrodes to investigate if electrode position accounts, at least in part, for the width of neural excitation. In accordance with previous findings, electrode position explained 24% of the variance in slopes of the spatial tuning curves. All functioning electrodes were also measured for MDTs. Five ears showed a positive correlation between MDTs and at least one distance measure across the array; 6 ears showed negative correlations and the remaining two ears showed no relationship. The ears showing positive MDT-distance correlations, thus benefiting from electrodes being close to the neural elements, were those who performed better on the two speech recognition measures, i.e., speech reception thresholds (SRTs) and recognition of the AzBio sentences. These results could suggest that ears able to take advantage of the proximal placement of electrodes are likely to have better speech recognition outcomes. Previous histological studies of humans demonstrated that speech recognition is correlated with spiral ganglion cell counts. Alternatively, ears with good speech recognition outcomes may have good overall neural health, which is a precondition for close electrodes to produce spatially confined neural excitation patterns that facilitate modulation sensitivity. These findings suggest that the methods to reduce channel interaction, e.g., perimodiolar electrode array or current focusing, may only be beneficial for a subgroup of CI users. Additionally, it suggests that estimating neural survival preoperatively is important for choosing the most appropriate electrode array type (perimodiolar vs. lateral wall) for optimal implant function.

Long-Term Auditory and Speech Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Children With Cochlear Nerve Aplasia.

In this study, we aimed to (1) review the long-term outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with cochlear nerve aplasia and (2) compare the development of their auditory and speech abilities to children with normal-sized cochlear nerves. This is a retrospective case-control study. Patients who underwent unilateral cochlear implant (CI) surgery in a tertiary referral center from September 2012 to December 2018 were reviewed. The study group included 55 children with cochlear nerve aplasia diagnosed using preoperative images. The control group included 35 children with normal-sized cochlear nerves. The control group did not differ from the study group in terms of age at implantation, pre-implantation auditory and speech abilities, or the electrode array type. Cochlear implantation outcomes were assessed using a test battery, including the Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) score, the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) score, behavioral audiometry, and closed- or open-set speech recognition tests. The development of auditory and speech abilities was compared between the two groups using Generalized Linear Mixed-effect Models. The mean duration of CI usage was 4.5 years (SD = 1.5, range = 2.0 to 9.5) in the study group. The CAP scores, SIR scores, and aided hearing thresholds improved significantly post-implantation in the study group, but were significantly poorer than those in the control group. Generalized Linear Mixed-effect Models showed that the development of CAP and SIR scores was significantly slower in the study group than in the control group. Overall, 27 (49%) children with cochlear nerve aplasia had some degree of open-set speech perception skills, but the monosyllabic and bisyllabic word recognition rates were significantly lower than those in the control group. For children with cochlear nerve aplasia, auditory perception and speech intelligibility continued to improve in the long-term follow-up, but this progress was significantly slower than in children with normal-sized cochlear nerves. Most children with cochlear nerve aplasia could obtain the ability of common phrase perception and understanding simple spoken language with consistent CI usage and auditory rehabilitation.

Speech Recognition Performance Differences Between Precurved and Straight Electrode Arrays From a Single Manufacturer.

Precurved cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays have demonstrated superior audiometric outcomes compared with straight electrodes in a handful of studies. However, previous comparisons have often failed to account for preoperative hearing and age. This study compares hearing outcomes for precurved and straight electrodes by a single manufacturer while controlling for these and other factors in a large cohort. Retrospective cohort study. Tertiary academic medical center. Two hundred thirty-one adult CI recipients between 2015 and 2021 with cochlear (Sydney, Australia) 522/622 (straight) or 532/632 (precurved) electrode arrays. Postactivation speech recognition and audiometric testing. Speech recognition testing (consonant-nucleus-consonant word [CNCw] and AzBio) was collected at 6 and 12 months postactivation. Hearing preservation was characterized by a low-frequency pure-tone average shift, or the change between preoperative and postoperative low-frequency pure-tone average. Two hundred thirty-one patients (253 ears) with 6-month and/or 12-month CNCw or AzBio testing were included. One hundred forty-nine (59%) and 104 (41%) ears were implanted with straight and precurved electrode arrays, respectively. Average age at implantation was 70 years (interquartile range [IQR], 58-77 y). There was no significant difference in mean age between groups. CNCw scores were significantly different ( p = 0.001) between straight (51%; IQR, 36-67%) and precurved arrays (64%; IQR, 48-72%). AzBio scores were not significantly different ( p = 0.081) between straight (72%; IQR, 51-87%) and precurved arrays (81%; IQR, 57-90%). Controlling for age, race, sex, preoperative hearing, and follow-up time, precurved electrode arrays performed significantly better on CNCw (b = 10.0; 95% confidence interval, 4.2-16.0; p < 0.001) and AzBio (b = 8.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-16.0;, p = 0.014) testing. Hearing preservation was not different between electrodes on adjusted models. During the study period, patients undergoing placement of precurved electrode arrays had significantly higher CNC and AzBio scores than patients receiving straight electrodes, even after controlling for age, preoperative hearing, and follow-up time. Understanding the difference in audiometric outcomes between precurved and straight electrode arrays will help to guide electrode selection. To understand differences in speech recognition scores postoperatively by electrode array type (precurved versus straight). To demonstrate a difference in hearing performance postoperatively by electrode type. III. Approved by the Institutional IRB (090155).