In a previous paper,the retardation of recrystallization in Cu-Cr-, Cu-Zr and Cu-Zr-Cr alloys could not be fully accounted for by either fine precipitates or solute atoms. In this paper, the authors investigated the rolling and annealing textures in these alloys. The rolling textures of Cu-Cr alloy are described by (110)[1\={1}2]+(112)[11\={1}] (Cu type). Cu-Zr and Cu-Zr-Cr alloys have the same textures described by (110)[1\={1}2] (Brass type). But the annealing textures of Cu-Cr alloy are described by (225)[73\={4}]+(100)[001]. Cu-Zr and Cu-Zr-Cr alloys have the same annealing textures described by (110)[112] (Recrystallizatition in situ). If Cr and Zr remain to be solved during recovery and recrystallization, the annealing textures must become the Cu type (100)[001] or the Brass type (225(73\={4}]. The reason for such a difference between the annealing textures of these alloys was considered due to the formation of fine precipitates during recrystallization which obstructs dislocation climbing, sliding and grain boundary migration.