1711 Resting metabolic rate (RMR) is a primary contributor to energy balance, representing up to 75% of total energy expenditure. Like any other measurement, however, its usefulness depends on its accuracy and reliability. PURPOSE: To examine the shortterm test-retest variability of RMR. METHODS: RMR was measured on 40 volunteers (20 male, 20 female). Subjects avoided exercise, caffeine, nicotine and food for three hours prior to testing. Following a 30-minute period to achieve a resting steady state, expired air was collected in Douglas bags via a mouthpiece and a two-way valve for two 10-minute intervals, with a 10-minute interval separating the assessments. Subjects remained in a supine position with minimal movement throughout the protocol. For the analysis, the lower value (LVO2) for each subject was compared to the higher values (HVO2). RESULTS: The mean RMR values for the LVO2 and HVO2 were 235 ± 54 ml/min and 246 ± 53 ml/min, respectively, with the LVO2 and HVO2 evenly distributed across the two trials. A paired t-test (α = 0.05) revealed a significant difference between the two measurements. The average absolute and relative differences between the values were 11 ± 10 ml/min and 5.0%, respectively. Regression analyses were performed to establish any trends in the variability of the RMR values in relation to time of day, body weight, Body Mass Index, age, room temperature, and average RMR value. Each parameter yielded a low R2 value, indicating that the variance in the RMR values was not due to the variance in these parameters. The most significant factor for absolute difference was body weight (R2 = 0.044), and average RMR had the largest impact on the relative difference (R2 = 0.079). A t-test also found no significant difference in the variability of male and female subjects (p = 0.721 and 0.757 for absolute and relative differences, respectively). CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant short-term variability in RMR measurements, with an average individual difference of 5.0% for the two measurements. None of the potential influences examined demonstrated a significant effect on the variability of RMR.
Read full abstract