Two-stage Revision Research Articles

Prosthetic joint infection in the hip and knee

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the worst complications of joint arthroplasty with an incidence of around 1% following primary arthroplasty, 3% following aseptic revision, and 20% following septic revision. It can occur following direct inoculation, haematogenous or contiguous spread. The majority of PJIs are secondary to bacterial infection although fungal PJI may be seen in multiply operated or immune compromised patients. Risk factors for PJI include patient, pathology and procedure-related factors which, where possible, should be optimized prior to surgery. The diagnosis of PJI remains a challenge and is based on patient history, clinical examination, laboratory tests, and imaging studies. No diagnostic assessment is 100% accurate with various diagnostic criteria used clinically. Investigation and treatment of PJI should be guided by a multi-disciplinary team. Surgical treatment remains the gold standard with the aim of eradicating infection. During surgery the causative organism is sought through a rigorous standardized tissue sampling technique. Surgical approaches including debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR), single-stage revision, two-stage revision, excision arthroplasty, arthrodesis and amputation. The approach used is tailored to the individual patient with the optimum surgical strategy being one that successfully eradicates the infection, but at the same time minimizes morbidity to the patient.

Outcomes of 1-Stage Versus 2-Stage Revisions After Hip Prosthetic Joint Infection

Background: Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are significant complications of total joint arthroplasties. The incidence of this dangerous complication is expected to rise, but there is not a unanimous solution. Two-stage surgical revisions are the traditional gold standard of treatment, but recent literature suggests that 1-stage revisions can be equally effective. A comparison of the outcomes of 2-stage revisions vs. 1-stage revisions has not been thoroughly investigated. This systematic review and meta-analysis were designed to compare the outcomes of 2-stage exchanges vs. 1-stage exchanges in the treatments of hip PJI based on comparison studies. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for relevant studies that compared the effectiveness and outcomes of 1-stage and 2-stage procedures from January 2000 to May 2023. Keywords relating to hip PJI were used, and comparison studies of 1-stage vs. 2-stage procedures that reported patient characteristics and outcomes including success rates, rates of reinfection, or other outcomes such as functional outcomes (e.g., mean Harris hip scores), infection-free survival, and blood loss were included. Statistical analysis for this study was conducted using Review Manager 5.4 with a standard p-value of ≤ 0.05 for statistical significance. Results: Fifteen articles and 1,017 patients were included in the meta-analysis. One-stage revision procedures (320 patients) were found to have greater success rates (i.e., lower rates of reinfection) than 2-stage revisions (697 patients) (p = 0.04). One-stage revisions (184 patients) had shorter durations of operation and less blood loss than 2-stage revisions (90 patients) (p < 0.05). Conclusion: One-stage revision procedures are associated with lower reinfection rates, blood loss, and durations of operation compared with 2-stage revisions. Level of Evidence: I.

A Propensity Score Matched Exploration of Infection in Primary Total Ankle Arthroplasty.

Infection is a serious complication of primary total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) and can lead to implant failure and revision surgery. Various demographic, comorbidity, and surgical factors have been associated with an increased risk of infection. However, the evidence base remains limited, and further research is needed regarding infection in TAA. This study aims to analyze risk factors of infection and explore outcomes following infected TAA. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from a single institution from 2002 to 2022. Patients who underwent primary TAA and had subsequent infection were identified through annual registry surveillance and matched using propensity score matching (PSM) based on various demographic, comorbidity, and surgical factors. Demographics were compared between the matched groups using Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher exact test. The outcomes following infection were identified and summarized using descriptive statistics. A total of 1863 patients who underwent primary TAA were identified, and 19 were diagnosed with an infection. The identifiable overall infection rate was 1.0%. After PSM, there were no significant differences in the difference in age, gender, BMI, and smoking status between the infected and control cohort. There was a statistically significant increase in the rate of diabetes in the infected cohort. The subsequent surgical intervention resulted in limb salvage in 18 (94.7%) cases. Out of the total number of cases, 2-stage revision to total ankle replacement was performed in 7 cases, whereas revision to arthrodesis and isolated polyethylene exchange were each carried out in 4 cases. One patient had to undergo amputation; however, at the time of the most recent follow-up, all patients were found to be free of infection. This study demonstrated high rates of a history of smoking and diabetes in the infected TAA cohort. The diabetes rate in the infected group was significantly higher than the noninfected controls. Two-stage revision to total ankle replacement was performed in 7 cases, and revision to arthrodesis and isolated polyethylene exchange were each carried out in 4 cases. Overall, a high rate of limb salvage was reported. Level III, case-control study.

Change in organism between first- and second-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection of knee arthroplasty independently associated with increased risk of failure.

Achievement of accurate microbiological diagnosis prior to revision is key to reducing the high rates of persistent infection after revision knee surgery. The effect of change in the microorganism between the first- and second-stage revision of total knee arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) on the success of management is not clear. A two-centre retrospective cohort study was conducted to review the outcome of patients who have undergone two-stage revision for treatment of knee arthroplasty PJI, focusing specifically on isolated micro-organisms at both the first- and second-stage procedure. Patient demographics, medical, and orthopaedic history data, including postoperative outcomes and subsequent treatment, were obtained from the electronic records and medical notes. The study cohort consisted of 84 patients, of whom 59.5% (n = 50) had successful eradication of their infection at a mean follow-up of 4.7 years. For the 34 patients who had recurrence of infection, 58.8% (n = 20) had a change in isolated organism, compared to 18% (n = 9) in the infection eradication group (p < 0.001). When adjusting for confound, there was no association when the growth on the second stage was the same as the first (odd ratio (OR) 2.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49 to 12.50; p = 0.269); however, when a different organism was identified at the second stage, this was independently associated with failure of treatment (OR 8.40, 95% CI 2.91 to 24.39; p < 0.001). There were no other significant differences between the two cohorts with regard to patient demographics or type of organisms isolated. Change in the identified microorganism between first- and second-stage revision for PJI was associated with failure of management. Identification of this change in the microorganism prior to commencement of the second stage may help target antibiotic management and could improve the success of surgery in these patients.

Is Gentamicin Elution Influenced by the Timing of Antibiotic Addition to the Bone Cement? An In Vitro Study on Articulating Hip Spacers

Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) is a challenging complication after joint replacements, and cement spacers are standard treatment in two-stage revision surgery. This experimental in vitro study aimed to evaluate the elution properties of different gentamicin formulations from commercially available intraoperative molded hip cement spacers. The study compared spacers prepared with premixed antibiotic bone cement, spacers with antibiotic powder added during preparation, spacers stored for two months, and spacers with an additional antibiotic. The results showed that the timing of antibiotic addition influenced gentamicin elution, with immediate elution resulting in higher levels than stored spacers. Spacers with antibiotic powder added during preparation exhibited higher elution than premixed antibiotic spacers. Furthermore, adding vancomycin to the bone cement significantly increased gentamicin elution. These findings suggest that optimizing the timing and method of antibiotic addition in cement spacers may enhance the effectiveness of antibiotic treatment in PJI. However, further research is needed to validate these findings and explore their clinical implications.

Clinical Outcomes After Revision Hip Arthroplasty due to Prosthetic Joint Infection—A Single-Center Study of 369 Hips at a High-Volume Center With a Minimum of One Year Follow-Up

BackgroundProsthetic joint infection (PJI) treatment decisions are traditionally based on treatment algorithms. There is, however, a lack of evidence to support the choice of these treatment algorithms. Therefore, we aimed to assess the one-year survival after PJI revision and compared different surgical strategies in a single-center setting. MethodsRevisions of the hip due to PJI performed at our institution between January 2008 and September 2021 with at least one-year of follow-up were identified. In total, 134 debridement, antibiotics, and implant retentions (DAIRs), 114 one-stage revisions, and 121 two-stage revisions were performed. Infections were classified as early, acute hematogenous, and chronic. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and cumulative incidence function. Predictors of outcomes were examined with Fine-Gray regressions and Cox proportional hazards regressions. Subdistribution hazard ratios and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. ResultsAt one-year follow-up, 26.6% (CI 22.2 to 31.2%) of the patients had undergone reoperation and 7.9% (CI 5.4 to 10.9%) had died. The risk for reoperation was highest after DAIR (36.6%, CI 28.5 to 44.7%) and lowest after one-stage revision (20.2%, CI 13.4 to 28%). Within the early infections, the one-stage revision almost halved the risk of reoperation (HR 0.51, CI 0.31 to 0.84) with no added mortality risk (HR 1.05, CI 0.5 to 2.2), when compared to DAIR. ConclusionBy utilizing 1-stage revision over DAIR in early infections, it might be possible to improve the prognosis by decreasing the risk of reoperation without increasing mortality. However, as the patient selection is undeniably difficult, more research is warranted.

Two-Stage Revision ACL Reconstruction with Arthroscopic Tunnel Bone Grafting

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a common orthopedic surgery, and due to the increased number of primary reconstructions being performed, the number of revision ACL reconstructions is also increasing. Indications: Two-stage revision ACL reconstruction has lower failure rates compared to 1-stage and is indicated when significant tunnel expansion has occurred or malpositioned tunnels prohibit an adequate reconstruction. In this presentation, 2-stage revision ACL reconstruction was performed with an arthroscopic bone grafting technique of both the femoral and tibial tunnels secondary to tunnel osteolysis. Technique Description: Standard diagnostic arthroscopy is performed, and any chondral or meniscal pathology is addressed. The remnant ACL graft and all hardware are removed. The tunnels are debrided thoroughly. Using a modified syringe, the tunnels are packed with a mixture of cancellous bone chips and cortical fibers that have been hydrated with whole blood and platelet-rich plasma (PRP). The patient is placed into a brace postoperatively, and a computed tomography (CT) is obtained approximately 4 to 6 months postoperatively to assess for bone healing. Revision ACL reconstruction is performed once indicated with standard rehabilitation and return to play protocol. Results: Both 1-stage and 2-stage revision ACL reconstructions have been demonstrated to have significant improvement in outcomes scores preoperatively to postoperatively. However, 2-stage has lower failure rates compared to single-stage and has a high return to level of play. Discussion/Conclusion: Revision ACL reconstruction is becoming more commonly performed, and 2-stage revision is frequently required due to multiple factors. In this video, we demonstrate bone grafting for revision ACL reconstruction for tunnel osteolysis. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

The Influence of Patient Sex on Outcomes Following One-Stage and Two-Stage Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Although females have a higher rate of primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA), males have a higher rate of revision. The literature lacks studies examining the relationship between sex and outcomes following single and two-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The purpose of this study was to examine if differences exist in outcomes following revision for chronic PJI between sexes. A retrospective review was performed on all patients with an MSIS confirmed PJI who underwent a single or two-stage exchange at our institution from January 2010 to January 2021. Patient demographics, comorbidity characteristics, and outcomes were collected and compared between males and females. The primary outcome variable was disease-free survival at 1 year following definitive revision. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine risk factors for failure. Of the 470 patients meeting final eligibility criteria, 250 were male and 226 were female (2 males and 4 females had a joint infection of either the contralateral side or a different joint and were treated as separate records). Of the patients in the cohort, 80% of the males (200/250) and 80% of the females (181/226) were found to be disease-free at 1-year follow-up (p > 0.99). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that nicotine use and diabetes, but not sex, were significant predictors of failure. Our study did not find a relationship between sex and outcome of revision for PJI. Further research is required to determine whether differences exist between males and females in the expression of PJI and outcomes following treatment.

1244 Wound Dehiscence and Infection of a Total Knee Replacement Secondary to Postoperative ‘Dorsal Fin’ Intra-Articular Vertical Patella Dislocation

Abstract A 75-year-old man presented to our emergency department with a bleeding wound 19 days following a primary hinged left total knee replacement, performed elsewhere, for lateral tibiofemoral osteoarthritis. Examination revealed a knee held in fixed flexion of 30°, with partial dehiscence of the wound, implant exposure and a visible patella. Radiographs revealed an abnormally raised joint line with a vertical appearance of the patella on the lateral image. The decision was made to proceed with a two-stage revision. At operation, the patella was confirmed to be vertically positioned in the trochlea groove of the femoral component and identified as the likely cause for the wound dehiscence. There was evidence of a large lateral release having been performed during the primary surgery. A joint orthoplastic wound debridement was performed, together with implant removal, and static cement spacer insertion. Following an eight-week interval of IV antibiotics, the second stage was performed. A new hinged implant was implanted, with metaphyseal sleeves and stems. A tibial tubercle osteotomy was required to address the lateral tracking patella and a gastrocnemius flap was necessary to address a distal soft tissue defect. This case study highlights an unusual cause for wound dehiscence following total knee arthroplasty. Patella dislocation with vertical axis rotation has been described in the native knee1, but to our knowledge, this is the first report of this phenomenon following arthroplasty. This was almost certainly secondary to component malpositioning and emphasizes the significance of restoring the native joint line and correct implant rotation during knee replacement surgery.

The efficacy of antibiotic-eluting material in a two-stage model of periprosthetic joint infection.

Periprosthetic joint infections occur in about 2% of patients who undergo primary total joint arthroplasty, a procedure performed over 1 million times in the United States. The gold standard of treatment is a two-stage revision. This study aimed to establish a two-stage procedure in a preclinical small animal model (rat) to test and compare the efficacy of an antibiotic-eluting material in managing infection. Joint replacement was simulated by transchondylarly implanting a polyethylene (PE) plug into the distal femur and a titanium screw in the proximal tibia. Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) 108 CFU/mL was injected into the tibial canal and the joint space before wound closure. The control groups were killed on postoperative day (POD) 18 (n = 12) and on POD 42 (n = 4) to assess both early and later-stage outcomes in the control group. The test group underwent revision surgery on POD 18 for treatment using gentamicin-eluting polyethylene (GPE, n = 4) and was observed until POD 42 to evaluate the efficacy of treatment. Our results showed that the bone loss for the treatment group receiving GPE was significantly less than that of the control (p < 0.05), which was supported by the histology images and an AI-tool assisted infection rate evaluation. Gait metrics duty factor imbalance and hindlimb temporal symmetry were significantly different between the treatment and control groups on Day 42. This animal model was feasible for evaluating treatments for peri-prosthetic joint infections (PJI) with a revision surgery and specifically that revision surgery and local antibiotic treatment largely hindered the peri-prosthetic bone loss. Statement of clinical significance: This revision model of peri-prosthetic infection has the potential of comparatively evaluating prophylaxis and treatment strategies and devices. Antibiotic-eluting UHMWPE is devised as at tool in treating PJI while providing weight bearing and joint space preservation.

Revizyon Yapılan Enfekte Kalça Artroplastilerinde İntraoperatif Hipokloröz Asit Kullanımı

Aim: Arthroplasty infections are serious and difficult to treat complications. Hypochlorous acid (HOCl) is an oxidant produced endogenously in the body as a physiological part of the inflammatory process, with the aim of eliminating pathogens activated by neutrophils. The aim of this study was to evaluate the positive and negative effects on clinical results of HOCl used as an irrigation solution during surgical treatment. Material and Methods: The study included 37 patients who underwent single- or two-stage revision surgery at the University of Health Sciences Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital Orthopedics and Traumatology Clinic between January 2017 and December 2021. Treatment was applied according to our standard protocol of irrigation with 450 cc HOCl following implant removal and an additional 50 cc HOCl to the subcutaneous tissue after closing the fascia. The patients were evaluated during follow-up in respect of infections. Results: While single-stage revision surgery applied to 20 patients, two-stage revision surgery applied to 17 patients. 17 (45.9%) of the patients were male and 20 (54.1%) were female with a mean age of 72.8±11.1 years. The mean follow-up period was 25.8±14.1 months. Revision surgery was performed on one patient in each of the single and two-stage surgery groups. A success rate of 94.6% (n=37) was obtained when all patients were evaluated. Conclusion: The HOCl solution can be considered to make a positive contribution to the eradication of infections in revision hip arthroplasty and can be an effective and safe alternative to other irrigation solutions.

High infection control rate after systematic one-stage procedure for shoulder arthroplasty chronic infection.

The twostage revision procedure is the gold standard surgical technique in chronic shoulder periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Series of onestage revision have been published with similar outcomes but with preoperative selection of patients. The aim of this work was to report the outcomes (infection eradication, functional, and radiographic) after systematic onestage revision, without preoperative selection of patients, in chronic shoulder PJI. This was a retrospective monocentric study including 40 patients (14 women and 26 men) with a diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection after a shoulder arthroplasty. A onestage shoulder prosthesis revision was performed in all patients, for a PJI evolving for more than three weeks, without preoperative patient selection. The primary endpoint was the absence of signs of persistent infection at a minimum follow-up of two years. Secondary endpoints were clinical and radiological outcomes. At the last follow-up, 36/40 patients had no recurrence of infection after the onestage revision, i.e., 90% of our series. In 45% (18/40) of the cases, the microbial organism was not known at the time of the onestage revision. Cutibacterium acnes was the most frequent pathogen, found in 67.5% (27/40) of the patients. The infection was polymicrobial in 40% (16/40) of the cases. At last follow-up, mean absolute Constant score was 48.4% (16-93) and weighted score was 65.5% (22-100), and satisfaction was evaluated by the patients as excellent or good in 75% (30/40). About 20% (8/40) of the patients had a postoperative complication. A onestage revision procedure, combined with appropriate antibiotic therapy, made it possible to eradicate the PJI in 90% of the shoulders in our series with satisfactory functional outcomes.

Enhanced antibiotic release from bone cement spacers utilizing dual antibiotic loading with elevated vancomycin concentrations in two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection

PurposeAntibiotic loaded bone cement spacers provide high local antibiotic concentrations, preserve bone stock, and reduce soft tissue contractions. The objective of this in-vitro study was to compare antibiotic release from spacers, aiming to discover the most optimal preparation and identify modifiable factors that can further enhance antibiotic release.MethodsSix distinct spacer preparation were created using three different bone cements and manual incorporation of antibiotics. During a six-week period, the release of antibiotics from each spacer was measured individually at ten predetermined time points using a chemiluminescent immunoassay.ResultsManually adding 4 g of vancomycin to every 40 g of “Palacos R + G” yielded the most favorable release profile. Throughout all preparations, antibiotic release consistently and significantly decreased over the six-week period. When incorporating a higher concentration of vancomycin, a significantly higher cumulative release of vancomycin was observed, with varying effects on the release of gentamicin. The choice of bone cement had a significant impact on antibiotic release.ConclusionTo enhance antibiotic release from spacers, surgeons should manually incorporate high antibiotic concentrations into the most appropriate bone cement and keep the interim period as short as possible. Specifically, we suggest manual incorporation of 4 g of vancomycin to every 40 g of gentamicin premixed "Palacos R + G" to create bone cement spacers.

The fate of fungal periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty.

To demonstrate the clinical outcomes of patients with fungal periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) after two-stage exchange arthroplasty combined with antifungal therapy. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 41 patients with fungal PJIs after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a single centre from January 1999 to October 2017. During the first stage of resection arthroplasty, antifungal-impregnated cement spacers (AICSs) were implanted in all patients. After systemic antifungal treatment during the interval between the two surgeries, delayed reimplantation as part of a two-stage exchange protocol was performed when patients were clinically stable. We defined treatment success as a well-functioning arthroplasty without any signs of PJI after a minimum follow-up of two years without antimicrobial suppression. Successful treatment was confirmed by repeat negative cultures as well as a return of inflammatory markers to normal levels. The treatment success rate was 63.4% at the final follow-up. Thirty-six of 41 patients (87.8%) met the criteria for second-stage revision after confirmation of complete infection control. The mean prosthesis-free interval was 6.6 months (range, 2.0-30.0 months). During follow-up after two-stage exchange arthroplasty, ten patients (27.7% of 36 patients) unfortunately experienced recurrence or relapse of infection after an average of 31.3 months (range, 2.7-135.6 months). The rate of survivorship free from reinfection was 94.4% at six months, 84.8% at one year, and 73.6% at two years. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis demonstrated that the prosthesis-free interval (HR = 1.016, p = 0.037) and mean length of antifungal treatment (HR = 0.226, p = 0.046) were potential risk factors for failure. Fungal PJIs led to devastating clinical outcomes despite even two-stage revision arthroplasty with the use of AICSs and antifungal medications.

Functional Outcome of Above-Knee Amputation After Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Periprosthetic joint infection is a serious complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Management usually involves irrigation and debridement, polyethylene liner exchange, one-stage revision, two-stage revision, knee arthrodesis, or ultimately above-knee amputation (AKA). We present our experience with 21 patients who underwent AKA as a sequela of unresolved infected TKA, highlighting their etiology and functional outcomes. A retrospective chart review was performed for all cases of infected TKA treated with AKA at 1 institute from January 2007 to December 2020, with a minimum follow-up of 1year. Patient demographics, Charlson comorbidity index, culture results, ambulation status, prosthesis fitting, and functional outcomes were collected. Short Form-36 and activities of daily living questionnaires were used for functional outcome assessment. Twenty-one patients were identified, 7 of whom were male (33.3%). Mean ± standard deviation follow-up was 5.7 ± 3.1 years (range, 1-11 years). Mean ± standard deviation age was 57.9 ± 10.7 years (range, 38-87 years), and the mean body mass index was 33.5 ± 6.4 kg/m2 (range, 25.4-46 kg/m2). Gram-positive organisms were identified in 15 cases (66.7%). Prosthesis fitting was successful in 17 patients (81%). Post-AKA ambulation was achieved in 12 patients (57.1%). The ambulating group showed higher Short Form-36 and activities of daily living scores when compared with patients who did not ambulate (60.2 vs 43.3, P= .041, and 67.2 vs 52.7, P= .029, respectively). AKA should be considered solely as the final recourse for infected TKA. Despite the low-to-moderate patient-reported postoperative outcomes, prosthesis fitting and maintaining ambulation can improve postoperative functional outcomes.

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Two-Stage Revision Knee Arthroplasty in Infected Primary Knee Arthroplasty

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Two-Stage Revision Knee Arthroplasty in Infected Primary Knee Arthroplasty

Hip &amp; Pelvis

The August 2023 Hip &amp; Pelvis Roundup360 looks at: Using machine learning to predict venous thromboembolism and major bleeding events following total joint arthroplasty; Antibiotic length in revision total hip arthroplasty; Preoperative colonization and worse outcomes; Short stem cemented total hip arthroplasty; What are the outcomes of one- versus two-stage revisions in the UK?; To cement or not to cement? The best approach in hemiarthroplasty; Similar re-revisions in cemented and cementless femoral revisions for periprosthetic femoral fractures in total hip arthroplasty; Are hip precautions still needed?

Factors Influencing the Clinical Outcomes of Two-Stage Re-Implantation in Patients With Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Introduction Infection is one of the most distressing complications of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), requiring a long treatment process and may negatively affect patient satisfaction. All surgeons aim to achieve infection-free survival, painless, functional, and stable knee after treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) with two-stage revision treatment. Many factors play a role in determining clinical outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the factors influencing the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing two-stage revision knee arthroplasty for PJI. Methods Forty-nine patients were retrospectively evaluated. Forty-four patients met the inclusion criteria. Spacer types, growth rates in culture, types and amount of antibiotics added to the cement, and intervals between stages were evaluated. Pre- and post-treatment infection parameters, changes in the range of motion (ROM), clinical and functional (C&F) Knee Society Score (KSS) results, and complications were also studied. Results After a mean follow-up of 48.8 ± 16.5 months, re-infection was detected in five out of 44 patients (10.4%). No significant difference was noted regarding C&F KSS when comparing time intervals between the two stages, whether they were shorter or longer than 10 weeks. However, better ROM results were obtained in patients with less than 10 weeks between stages. The relationship between spacer type, ROM, and C&F KSS was not found to be significant. Particularly, the addition of 4g of teicoplanin to the cement shortened the time between the two stages. Conclusion C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) levels can be considered safe parameters for diagnosis, reimplantation timing, and follow-up. The use of dynamic spacers or reimplantation performed within 10 weeks after the first stage is associated with better ROM outcomes. Additionally, the addition of teicoplanin to the cement shortened the duration of antibiotic therapy.

Can serum C-reactive protein determine the timing of reimplantation in two-stage revised arthroplasty for periprosthetic hip infection?

BackgroundThere are no definitive guides to determine the timing of reimplantation in two-stage revision total hip arthroplasties (THA) for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). This study was to design to support a rational strategy of surgical treatment using serum C-reactive protein (CRP). MethodsWe analyzed a total of 75 hips for PJI in the process of performing two-stage and multiple-stage revision THAs. CRP level was retrospectively evaluated every week and transformed to log2 (CRP) using a logistic regression model. Prosthesis survival from recurrent infection was determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis, using implant removal as the endpoint. Receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated using each log2 (CRP) to assess predictions of recurrent infection. ResultsThe 10-year survival rates were 85% (95% confidence interval, 76–95) and 100% for two-stage and multiple-stage revision THAs, respectively. Preoperatively, at 1, 2, 3, and 5 weeks, log2 (CRP) was not associated with recurrent infection. In failed two-stage revision THAs, log2 (CRP) at 3 weeks divided by that at 2 weeks showed a significant difference. Failure was associated with a ratio of >4.0 for the CRP level between 3 and 2 weeks. ConclusionIn two-stage revision THA for PJI, patients with CRP elevation from 2 weeks to 3 weeks, especially 4-fold elevation, suggests the need for further debridement and postponement of second-staged reimplantation.

Two-Stage Revision Arthroplasty for Resistant Gram-Positive Periprosthetic Joint Infections Using an Oral Linezolid-Based Antibiotic Regime.

Increasing antibiotic resistance has been reported as an issue in the systemic treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Linezolid offers the advantages of high oral bioavailability and little resistance; however, efficacy in the treatment of PJI varies considerably, and studies reporting consistent surgical treatment are scarce. This is a retrospective, single-center analysis of two-stage revisions performed between 2008 and 2017. We identified 111 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Oral linezolid was given for 28 days following 14 days of intravenous tailored antibiotics in resistant gram-positive PJI. A total of 64% of the patients had methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci. The median follow-up was 43 (interquartile range (IQR) 30-57) months. 22% (24/111) of the patients underwent surgery for subsequent infection. The 5-year infection-free survival probability was 77% (95% confidence interval (CI) 69-85). A total of 5% of the patients (6/111) had the same organism at the time of reinfection. The patients with infections caused by other organisms than Coagulase-negative staphylococci tended to have a worse reinfection-free survivorship at five years (70% vs. 81%, p = 0.09). Furthermore, the patients with obesity tended to have reduced reinfection-free survivorship at five years (69% vs. 84%, p = 0.08). Overall, 5% (6/111) of the patients had blood count abnormalities with no treatment discontinuations. Two-stage revision arthroplasty with systemic oral linezolid treatment for resistant gram-positive PJI results in an infection control of 77% at the mid-term.