Two-stage Reimplantation Research Articles

Two-stage reimplantation for the treatment of deep infection after shoulder arthroplasty

Two-stage reimplantation is the most common treatment modality considered for periprosthetic shoulder infection (PSI). Most studies to date have reported on a relatively small number of shoulders. The purpose of this study was to determine the outcome of 2-stage reimplantation for PSI in terms of both eradication of infection and restoration of function. Between 1980 and 2010, 40 shoulders (39 patients) underwent a 2-stage reimplantation for PSI; 35 shoulders (34 patients) met inclusion criteria (10 hemiarthroplasties, 24 anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties, 1 reverse total shoulder arthroplasty). Outcome data included pain, motion, Neer rating, and complications. At most recent follow-up (4.1 years), 2-stage reimplantation had resulted in significant improvements in pain (from 4.4 to 2 on a 5-point scale; P < .0001), mean forward elevation (64°-118°; P < .0001), and mean external rotation (14°-41°; P < .0001). Preoperative testing showed leukocytosis in 1 patient, elevated C-reactive protein concentration in 67%, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate in 61%, and positive preoperative aspiration in 69%. Persistent infection, defined as positive cultures in samples obtained at the time of reimplantation, was identified in 5 shoulders (15%); 50% of persistent infections grew Propionibacterium acnes. Reoperations for infection included irrigation and débridement (1), a second 2-stage reimplantation (2), and resection arthroplasty (1); 2 additional patients were treated with chronic suppression. Reoperation for aseptic glenoid loosening was performed in 2 additional shoulders. Results were graded excellent in 10 (28%), satisfactory in 12 (33%), and unsatisfactory in 13 (39%) shoulders. Two-stage reimplantation eradicated PSI in 85% of the shoulders. Pain relief and good arcs of motion were achieved in many patients, but there was an overall rate of unsatisfactory results approaching 40%. Preoperative testing was not always reliable for the diagnosis of PSI.

Two-stage knee arthrodesis with a modular intramedullary nail due to septic failure of revision total knee arthroplasty with extensor mechanism deficiency

BackgroundPeriprosthetic joint infection is a serious complication and reconstruction after failed revision total knee arthroplasty with significant bone loss and compromised soft-tissues can be challenging. Objective of this study was to assess clinical and functional results, implant survival and infection recurrence rates in patients treated with two-stage arthrodesis after failed revision TKA with extensor mechanism deficiencies due to PJI, and to identify the factors that affect outcomes after surgery. MethodsThirty seven patients with PJI treated within a two-stage exchange and reimplantation of an arthrodesis nail between 2008 and 2014 were included. Systemic and local risk factors were graded preoperatively according to McPherson et al. All patients were treated according to a structured treatment algorithm. Clinical and functional evaluation was performed using the Oxford Knee Score and the Visual Analogue Scale. ResultsThirty two of 37 patients (86.5%) were graded as free of infection. Five patients (13.5%) had recurrent infection after arthrodesis with the need of revision surgery. Mean leg-length discrepancy was 2.2cm. The mean VAS for pain was three, the mean Oxford Knee Score was 38±9. Total implant survival at a 74month follow-up was 74.3% (95% CI: 45.4 to 91.1%), as determined by Kaplan–Meier survival curves. Local McPherson Score, as well as number of revisions was found to be of significant influence to the survival rate. ConclusionsSeptic failure of revision knee arthroplasty can be effectively treated with two-stage arthrodesis using a modular intramedullary nail, providing a stable and painless limb with satisfactory functional results and acceptable infection eradication rates.

The risk factors of failed reimplantation arthroplasty for periprosthetic hip infection

BackgroundTwo-stage reimplantation arthroplasty is one of the standard treatments for chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Scanty data exist regarding the risk factors for failure after two-stage reimplantation for periprosthetic hip infection. The purpose of this study was to investigate and identify the risk factors associated with failure after two-stage reimplantation hip arthroplasty.MethodsSixty-two patients with hip PJI treated with a two-stage reimplantation protocol at our institution from 2005 to 2012 were reviewed. Patients requiring medical treatment or reoperation for recurrent infection were defined as treatment failure. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the risk factors associated with treatment failure.ResultsOf the 62 patients, 11 (17.7%) patients had developed reinfection after the two-stage reimplantation with a mean follow-up of 5.7 years. The implant survival was 82.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 75.19−92.55) at 10 years. Multivariate analysis revealed BMI ≥30 kg/m2 (hazard ratio [HR] 9.16; 95% CI 1.51−55.3; p = 0.0158), liver cirrhosis (HR 6.39; 95% CI 1.09−37.4; p = 0.0398), gram-negative organism (HR 5.68; 95% CI 1.18−27.4; p = 0.0303), and presence of sinus tract (HR 18.2; 95% CI 2.15−153; p = 0.0077) as the independent risk factors for treatment failure.ConclusionsWe found obesity, liver cirrhosis, gram-negative organism, and the presence of sinus tract were significantly related to the risks of failure after reimplantation arthroplasties.

Comparison of the hospital costs for two-stage reimplantation for deep infection, single-stage revision and primary total elbow arthroplasty.

The purpose of the present study was to determine the cost of two-stage reimplantation for the treatment of deep infection after total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) and compare this with primary and aseptic revision TEA. Three hundred and seventy-one primary TEA and 286 revision TEAs (including 47 elbows requiring two-stage reimplantation) were performed. Total direct medical costs during each hospitalization were obtained from our institutional research database and compared for three groups: primary TEA, revision for nonseptic reasons and two-stage reimplantation for deep infection. The mean cost of an uncomplicated primary TEA and aseptic revision TEA was $18,464 and $18,796, respectively. The mean overall cost associated with two-stage reimplantation increased to $34,286. Two-stage reimplantation increased both Part A (hospital costs) and Part B (professional costs). The mean Part A cost for septic revision TEA was $29,102 versus $15,844 for primary TEA. The mean Part B cost for septic revision TEA was $5,184 versus $2,621 for primary TEA. Two-stage reimplantation for treatment of an infected TEA costs 186% the hospital cost of a primary uncomplicated or aseptic revision TEA. The overall cost to society is even greater if we take into account the cost of antibiotic therapy in between stages and lost days from work.

Paper #42 - Two-stage reimplantation for the treatment of deep infection after shoulder arthroplasty

Paper #42 - Two-stage reimplantation for the treatment of deep infection after shoulder arthroplasty

99mTc-labeled White Blood Cell Scan as a Guide to Open Biopsy in the Management of Hip and Knee Prosthesis Infection: Preliminary Results.

The aim of the present prospective study was to evaluate the usefulness of labeled leukocyte scan as a guide to open biopsy for the management of hip and knee prosthesis infection in patients without loosening of orthopedic device. Twenty-six patients with suspected hip (24) and knee (2) prosthesis infection underwent routine analysis of blood, plain radiography and 99mTc-HMPAO labelled leukocyte scan (WBCS). On these basis, patients were subdivided in the following groups: bone infection without loosening (n°=14), septic loosening (n°=8), superficial infection (n°=2), no infection (n°=2). Patients with septic loosening underwent empirical antibiotic therapy in order to avoid two-stage reimplantation. When the medical treatment was effective patients were submitted to one-stage operation. Patients without loosening of prosthesis but positive WBCS results underwent open biopsy: bone samples and periprosthetic tissues were taken from the regions showing pathological leukocyte uptake at the scan. Samples were submitted to microbiological examination and antibiotic treatments were undertaken in cases of bacterial growth. A 24-months clinical and instrumental follow-up was carried out in all patients. WBCS showed 22 patients affected by bone infection, 2 by superficial infection and 2 not infected. Height out of the 22 patients affected by deep infection had a septic loosening. In these cases, the medical treatment was inadequate in 6 patients and effective in 2. Fourteen patients with bone infection without loosening were submitted to open biopsy: in 9 cases a complete remission of the disease was found. Two patients, without infection, underwent single-stage surgery for mechanical problems. Superficial infection was assessed and successfully treated in 2 patients. The obtained results indicate that a multidisciplinary approach to infection of orthopedic prostheses, characterized by the combined use of open biopsy, WBC, and microbiological examination, produced positive outcome in 9 out of 14 patients.

The hospital cost of two-stage reimplantation for deep infection after shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundThe cost of treating infection after hip and knee arthroplasty is well documented in the literature. The purpose of this study was to determine the cost of two-stage reimplantation for deep infection after shoulder arthroplasty.MethodsBetween 2003 and 2012, 57 shoulders (56 patients) underwent a two-stage reimplantation for deep periprosthetic shoulder infection; implants placed at reimplantation included anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (a-TSA) in 58%, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (r-TSA) in 40%, and hemiarthroplasty (HA) in 2%. During the same timeframe, 2953 primary shoulder arthroplasties (2589 patients) were performed at the same institution (a-TSA in 55%, r-TSA in 28%, and HA in 17%). Total direct medical costs were calculated by using standardized, inflation-adjusted costs for services and procedures billed during hospitalization and were adjusted to nationally representative unit costs in 2013 inflation-adjusted dollars.ResultsThe mean hospital cost (per shoulder) for two-stage reimplantation was $35,824 (95% CI: 33,363 to 38,285) and was significantly higher than for primary procedures (mean: $16,068; 95% CI: 15,823 to 16,314). Both Part A and Part B costs were significantly higher in two-stage reimplantation (p < 0.001). For part A (hospital services), the mean cost for two-stage reimplantation was $29,851 (95% CI: 27,741 to 31,960), compared to $13,508 (95% CI: 13,302 to 13,715) for primaries. For part B (professional costs), mean costs were $5973 (95% CI: 5493 to 6453) versus 2560 (95% CI: 2512 to 2608) respectively.ConclusionsThe hospital cost of two-stage reimplantation for the treatment of an infected shoulder arthroplasty is about two times higher than the cost of a primary shoulder arthroplasty.

Articulating spacers compared to fixed spacers for the treatment of infected knee arthroplasty: A follow-up of 37 cases.

The standard treatment of a periprosthetic infection after TKA involves a two-stage reimplantation with the intermittent implantation of spacers. Different designs of spacers have been described; currently articulating spacers and fixed spacers are used. The aim of the present study is to compare the advantages/disadvantages of the different spacers. In this retrospective study we analyzed 37 cases after revision surgery of infected TKA. All patients that received spacers as part of the two-stage reimplantation were included. Exclusion criteria were massive bone loss prior to revision, because the implantation of a mobile spacer would not have been possible. The average ROM was 98.0 (± 14.9) degrees in the articulating spacer group (group 1) and 79.3 (± 22.5) in the group that received the fixed spacers (group 2) before revision surgery started. At a late follow up the average ROM for group 1 was 102.0 (± 8.4) and 79.0 (± 26) for group 2. The use of articulating spacers in the two-stage revision for infected total knee arthroplasty is a safe alternative to fixed spacers, that equally preserves ligament balancing and has equal infection eradication rates. A long term improvement of the range of motion following reimplantation of the new joint was, however, not observed.

Articulated spacer provides long-term knee improvement after two-stage reimplantation.

The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term outcome in patients who underwent two-stage reimplantation with an articulated spacer following a chronic periprosthetic knee infection. The hypothesis was that the use of an articulated spacer provides significant improvement of clinical results and knee functionality through a long follow-up period, and therefore a durable revision TKA. Forty-six consecutive patients (46 knees) who underwent two-stage reimplantation with an articulated spacer for a chronic periprosthetic knee infection were retrospectively analysed. An articulated cement spacer, moulded in surgery room, was implanted in all cases. Patients were followed for a median period of 12 (range 6-16) years, and no patients were lost to follow-up. Patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively through the IKS knee and function scores and ROM. Two-stage reimplantation was successful in controlling the infection in 91.3% of patients. In the 42 patients with a successful two-stage revision, the median IKS knee and function scores were 36 (range 16-56) points and 25 (range 15-35) points, respectively, before the operation, and 76 (range 52-94) points and 70 (range 55-90) points (p<0.001) at the last follow-up. The median ROM increased from 80 (range 60-110) degrees preoperatively to 115 (range 100-128) degrees (p<0.01) at the last follow-up. Two-stage septic revision with an articulated cement spacer provided a significant long-term improvement of preoperative clinical and functional knee scores and therefore a durable revision TKA. Retrospective case series, Level IV.

Antibiotic-Loaded Spacer for Two-Stage Revision of Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Infection of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a challenge in orthopedic surgery. In literature TKA infection is classified according to the time after surgery: acute postoperative; late chronic; acute hematogenous; positive intraoperative microbiological growth. The purpose of this study is to present the results of the use of a preformed antibiotic-loaded spacer in TKA infections, treated by a two-stage revision procedure. A series of 19 consecutive patients (20 knees) with a diagnosis of infected TKA were treated from January 2003 to February 2012. Two-stage reimplantation protocols were completed only in 16 patients and these data were included in the study. We lost three patients at follow-up. An antibiotic-loaded preformed articulating polymethylmethacrylate spacer was applied. Patients were observed 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively and then yearly for clinical and radiographic examination. The mean American Knee Society Score improved from 68.4 preoperatively (range, from 34 to 108) to 112.7 at final follow-up (range, from 49 to 180). The pain was evaluated as part of clinical score. It improved from an average of 19.3 preoperatively (range, from 10 to 30) to 34.3 at final follow-up (range, from 10 to 50). The average range of motion improved from 40.1 degrees (range, from 6 to 90 degrees) to 79.3 degrees (range, from 45 to 125 degrees). The use of the spacer allows obtaining a reduction of pain, an improvement of quality of life in the period of time between the two surgical stages and an easier reimplantation of TKA.

Autoclaved metal-on-cement spacer versus static spacer in two-stage revision in periprosthetic knee infection.

Background:Periprosthetic knee infection is troublesome for Orthopedic surgeons and a catastrophy for patients. Reported rates of periprosthetic joint infection following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are 0.39–2%. Two stage revision arthroplasty, which has success rates exceeding 90%, has been the gold standard for treating subacute and chronic periprosthetic infection following TKA. Antibiotic spacers, a well established means of delivering local antibiotic therapy, maintain soft tissue tension during two stage revision arthroplasty. However, controversy remains around whether static or mobile antibiotic impregnated spacers are superior for treating infection following TKA. Various mobile spacers are available, including cement-on-cement, cement-on-polyethylene and metal-on-polyethylene. In this study, the efficacy of the modified metal-on-cement spacer, consisting of reinsertion of the autoclaved femoral component and implantation of antibiotic-loaded cement in the proximal tibia, is assessed.Materials and Methods:Records of 19 patients diagnosed as periprosthetic knee infection were reviewed in this retrospective study. Among these patients, 10 patients received first stage debridement with the autoclaved metal-on-cement spacer and 8 patients with the static spacer, who eventually underwent two-stage re-implantation, were listed in the final comparison. Patient demographics, infection eradication rates, average range of motion (ROM), surgical time and blood loss during the second-stage of the surgery, and Knee Society (KS) knee scores at last followup after revision total knee replacement were clinically evaluated.Results:At a minimum of 2-year followup after re-implantation, infection eradication rates, surgical times, blood loss during the second-stage of the surgery, and KS knee score after re-implantation were similar for the two groups. Patients receiving autoclaved metal-on-cement spacers had superior ROM after re-implantation compared to that of patients with static spacers.Conclusions:The autoclaved metal-on-cement spacer is an effective and simple method for two-stage re-implantation of a periprosthetic knee infection. Through this spacer, the good interim ROM can be achieved without the additional cost of prefabricated molds or new polyethylene tibial inserts. In addition, ROM after re-implantation is better than that with static spacers.

Prosthetic knee infection by resistant bacteria: the worst-case scenario.

The aim of the present paper was to determine (1) the incidence of failure (defined as the persistence or the recurrence of the infection), (2) the incidence of prosthesis (or even limb) loss (defined as the final need for an arthrodesis, resection arthroplasty or amputation) and (3) what factors could influence the failure in patients treated with a two-stage reimplantation for periprosthetic knee infections caused by resistant bacteria. The authors retrospectively reviewed 29 total knee arthroplasties infected by resistant bacteria in 29 patients who underwent a two-stage revision. Between the stages, intravenous-targeted antibiotics were administered for a median period of 8 (range 6-12) weeks. Median follow-up was 10 (range 7-14) years. The authors found that failure occurred in 5 of 29 patients (17.2%). When methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MR-CoNS) were involved, failure rate was 10% (2 of 20). When vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE), multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii and MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa were involved, the failure rate was 33.3% (3 of 9). Of those five patients, two underwent amputations, one chronic suppressive antibiotic therapy, one arthrodesis and one resection arthroplasty; among them, three lost the limb (10.3% of the overall group). Timing of reimplantation and patient comorbidities did not significantly influence the failure. Two-stage protocol resulted in a viable option for patients with infections by some resistant organisms (MRSA and MR-CoNS). However, when highly resistant organisms were involved (VRE, MDR Acinetobacter Baumannii and MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa), the failure rate was much higher. In all cases of failure of the two-stage reimplantation, prosthesis (or even limb) loss occurred. Consequently, patients should be counselled that when highly resistant bacteria are involved, two-stage reimplantation could not be successful, with high final risk of prosthesis (or even limb) loss. Retrospective case series, Level IV.

Antibiotic-loaded articulating cement spacers in two-stage revision for infected total knee arthroplasty: individual antibiotic treatment and early results of 21 cases

ObjectiveTo detail our early experience and technique of a modified two-stage reimplantation protocol using antibiotic-loaded articulating cement spacers (ALACSs) for treatment of late periprosthetic infection after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MethodsFrom January 2006 to February 2009, aseries of 21 patients (21 knees) with late infected TKAs were treated by radical debridement and removal of all components and cement, and then articulating spacers were implanted using antibiotic-impregnated bone cement. For this purpose, 4g vancomycin powder was mixed with per 40g cement. Graduated knee motion and partial weight bearing activity were encouraged in the interval period. Each patient received an individual systemic organism-sensitiveantimicrobial therapy for 4.9 (range, 2-8) weeks followed by a second-stage TKA revision. All the patients were regularly followedup using the American Knee Society Scoring System. ResultsEach case underwent a successful two-stage exchange and had infection eradicated, none had recurrent infection after an average of 32.2 (range, 17-54) months of follow-up. Preoperatively, the mean knee score was 53.5 points, function score was 27.3 points, pain score was 25.7 points, range of motion (ROM) was 82.0°, extensor lag was 2°. Between stages, the mean knee score was increased to 61.3 points, function score to 45 points, pain score to 35 points, ROM to 88.2°, and extensor lag to 3.4°. At final follow-up, the mean knee score was further increased to 82.1 points, function score to 74.5 points, pain score to 42.1 points, ROM to 94.3°, and knee extension lag to 1.9°. The interval period was 11.5 (range, 6-32) weeks. The amount of bone loss was unchanged between stages. No patient developed noticeable dysfunction of the liver or kidney or other complications such as impaired wound healing, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, cerebrovascular accidents, etc. ConclusionsTreating infected TKA with ALACS avoids spacer-related bone loss, preserves knee function between stages, and eradicates infection effectively without significant complications. The early clinical results are inspiring. The authors believe that radical and repeated (if needed) debridement, individual application of systemic antibiotics, and reasonable timing judgement upon the secondary revision are all key factors related to a successful outcome with two-stage reimplantation procedure for infected TKA.

Knee Fusion or Above-The-Knee Amputation after Failed Two-Stage Reimplantation Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Control of infection after a failed two-stage TKA is not always possible, and the resolution of infection may require an above-knee amputation (AKA) or a the-knee (KF). The purpose of this review is to determine which treatment method (AKA or KF) yields better function and ambulatory status for patients after a failed two-stage reimplantation. A PubMed search related to the resolution of infection by means of an above-the-knee amputation (AKA) or a knee fusion was performed until 10 January 2015. The key words were: infected TKA and above-the-knee amputation. Five hundred and sixty-six papers were found, of which ten were reviewed because they were focused on the topic of the article. KF should be strongly considered as the treatment of choice for patients who have persistent infected TKA after a failed two-stage revision arthroplasty. Patients can walk at least inside the house, and activity of daily living independence is achieved by the patients with successful KF, although walking aids, including a shoe lift, are required. An intramedullary nail leads to better functional results than an external fixator. The functional outcome after AKA performed after TKA is poor. A substantial percentage of the patients never fit with a prosthesis, and those who are seldom obtain functional independence. Only 50% of patients are able to walk after AKA. Patients receiving KF for treating recurrent PJI after TKA have better function and ambulatory status compared to patients receiving AKA. KF must be recommended as the treatment of choice for patients who have persistent infected TKA after a failed two-stage reimplantation procedure.

No improvement in the post-TKA infection prognosis when the implant is not reimplanted: Retrospective multicentre study of 72 cases

IntroductionFor the surgeon and patient, permanent removal of an infected knee prosthesis is an unwelcome decision taken out of necessity because unfavourable local or general conditions may increase the likelihood of mechanical or infectious failure upon prosthesis reimplantation. The purpose of this study was to determine if permanent removal of an infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implant controls the infection and prevents above-the-knee amputation when reimplantation turns out to be too risky. It was hypothesized that removal without reimplantation contributes to eradicating the infection and helps to avoid amputation. Patients and methodsSeventy-two consecutive patients who underwent TKA removal between 2000 and 2010 at 14 hospitals were reviewed. The TKA removal was followed by knee fusion in 29 cases or implantation of a permanent cement spacer in 43 cases. ResultsIf failure is defined as clinically obvious recurrence of the infection, the survival rate was 65±5% at 2 years; 44% of patients had a recurrence of the infection, 8% had undergone amputation and 19% presented with nonunion at the last follow-up. The male gender and the presence of multiple co-morbidities were predisposing factors for failure. DiscussionControl of the infection is not guaranteed upon TKA implant removal; the success rate is lower than in cases of two-stage reimplantation. The outcomes in this study are worse than those of other published studies. This is likely due to the heterogeneity in the patient population and treatments, along with the presence of co-morbidities. This treatment option should be the last recourse before amputation. Level of evidenceLevel IV, Retrospective cohort study.

Intermediate-Term Results of 142 Single-Design, Rotating-Hinge Implants: Frequent Complications May Not Preclude Salvage of Severely Affected Knees

Rotating-hinge knee prostheses have low survivorship and high complications except in primary arthroplasties in elderly patients. We retrospectively reviewed 142 single third-generation design, rotating hinge prostheses (11 primary procedures and 131 revisions) at 57months follow up. Implant survival was 73 %. Successful two-stage reimplantation for prosthetic infection was 78.4% but new infection rate was 22%. The tibial component was durable while the femoral component was problematic. We observed only one patellar maltracking and no polyethylene wear. A third generation rotating-hinge arthroplasty reconstruction was reliable in complex problems. Outcomes in primary situations were excellent. Complications were the rule rather than the exception in revisions. With timely intervention, attention to soft tissue coverage, and realistic expectations, complications were contained and functional benefits were appreciable.

Two-Stage Total Knee Arthroplasty for Prosthetic Joint Infection

PurposeThis retrospective review was conducted to identify prognostic factors for two-stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and the rate of reinfection following revision TKA.Materials and MethodsOut of 88 patients diagnosed with post-TKA infection between 1998 and 2011, 76 underwent two-stage reimplantation and were reviewed in this study. The 76 patients were divided into two groups-those who experienced reinfection and those who did not. Comorbidities, culture results, and inflammation indices were analyzed and compared between the two groups.ResultsOf the 76 patients who underwent a two-stage reimplantation, 18 (23.7%) experienced reinfection. Patients with more than three comorbidities had significantly higher reinfection rates than those with less than three comorbidities (47.1% vs. 4.8%, p=0.032). The reinfection rate between the culture positive prosthetic joint infection group and the culture negative prosthetic joint infection group was not significantly different (p=0.056). Inflammation indices (erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] and C-reactive protein [CRP]) showed a statistically significant difference between patients with reinfection and those without reinfection at 4 weeks after the first-stage surgery.ConclusionsReimplantation must be carefully performed when the risk of reinfection is high, particularly in patients with more than three systemic or local comorbidities and higher inflammation indices (ESR and CRP) prior to revision TKA.

Long Term Treatment Results for Deep Infections of Total Knee Arthroplasty

This study aims to identify the long-term outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) treated for deep infection. 3270 consecutive primary and 175 revision TKAs were followed prospectively. There were 39 deep infections (1.16%): 29 primary (0.9%) and 10 revision (5.7%) cases. Two-stage resection and re-implantation procedure was performed in 13 primary cases with 10/13 (77%) successfully resolved. Early (<1month) Irrigation and Debridement (I&D) was performed in 16 primary cases with 100% success. Late (>4months) I&D was performed in 6 cases with 5/6 (83.3%) successful. Infection following revision TKA resulted in poor outcomes with both two-stage (2/4 successful) and I&D (2/6 successful). Deep infection after primary TKA can be successfully resolved with I&D and appropriate antibiotic treatment in the early postoperative course.

Reprise en deux temps d’infection péri prothétique fongique dans les suites d’une arthroplastie de genou de première intention

BackgroundFungal peri-prosthetic joint infections (PJI) are rare complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There exist no established guidelines in the treatment of these infections and controversies are focused on the usefulness of antifungal-loaded cement spacers, the duration of systemic antifungal treatment and the ideal interval between implant removal and reimplantation. Therefore, we ask if: (1) adding antifungal in cement space is a viable solution to manage fungal PJI, (2) there is no adverse effect adding antifungal medication in cement? HypothesisWe hypothesized that fungal PJI following TKA could be managed successfully by two-stage reimplantation strategy using antifungal-loaded cement spacer. Patients and methodsFive cases of fungal PJI following total knee arthroplasty were treated in our institution between 2007 and 2013 using a two-stage reimplantation strategy. The median elapsed time from primary arthroplasty to the diagnosis of infection was 7.4months (range, 5–10months). The infection was caused by Candida species in four cases and Pichia anomala in one case. Antibiotic- and antifungal-loaded articulating cement spacer was implanted during the interval between stages. Systemic antifungal agents were administered for at least 6weeks after removal of prosthesis in all cases. The mean interval between removal and reimplantation was 6months (range, 3–9months). ResultsAt a mean follow-up of 41.6months (range, 24–65months) after reimplantation, no patient had recurrent infection or revision due to any other reasons. The mean global IKS score improved from 58.4 (range, 37–96 points) preoperatively to 152.4 (range, 136–169 points) at final follow-up. The average range of motion of the knee for flexion improved from 63° (range, 10–110°) preoperatively to 98° (range, 80–120°) at final follow-up. ConclusionsFungal PJI following TKA can be successfully treated by a staged reimplantation strategy. Antibiotic- and antifungal-loaded cement spacer implanted during interval period between stages may be an effective adjunct to therapy. Effective antifungal therapy is crucial to a successful result without adverse effect. Level of evidenceIV: retrospective or historical series.

Two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty in cases of periprosthetic joint infection: an analysis of 50 cases.

Objectives: A periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a significant complication after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Still there is no agreement on a perfect diagnosis and treatment algorithm. The aim of this study was to evaluate the success and revision rates after two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and factors that affect the success rate. Material and Methods: 50 consecutive two-stage revision TKAs were performed between January 2011 and December 2012. We retrospectively reviewed study patient's charts including demographics, prior surgeries, comorbidities, incidence of persistent infection and revisions. At the final follow-up examination the patient's satisfaction, pain level and disorders were evaluated. A successful clinical outcome was defined as a functioning prosthesis without wound healing disorders, no sinuses tracts or other clinical evidence of a persistent infection. Results : Re-implantation of prosthesis was performed in 47 cases; three patients received a septic arthrodesis. Twelve patients had a persistent infection despite two-stage re-implantation resulting in a success rate of 76.0%. In eight of these twelve patients an infecting germ was isolated during second-stage procedure. Three patients received another two-stage revision arthroplasty and one patient an above knee amputation. A revision was performed in 23 of 50 patients (46.0%). Factors that diminish the success rate were further operations after primary TKA (p = 0.048), prior revision arthroplasties after TKA (p = 0.045), nicotine abuse (p = 0.048), Charlson comorbidity index above a score of 2 (p = 0.031) and a mixed flora during first-stage procedure (p < 0.001). Age, sex, immune status, chronic anticoagulant use, rheumatoid arthritis, body mass index and the presence of multidrug resistant germs showed no significant effect on success rate (p > 0.05). Conclusion : We found that patients who required surgery after the primary TKA, had a higher Charlson comorbidity index or were found to have mixed flora during explantation. The treatment of PJI remains difficult, both for the patient and for the treating surgeons.