Two-finger Technique Research Articles

Two-Finger Technique and No-Finger Technique of Holding a Face Mask

Two-Finger Technique and No-Finger Technique of Holding a Face Mask

A novel CPR-assist device vs. established chest compression techniques in infant CPR: A manikin study

IntroductionGuidelines for infant CPR recommend the two-thumb encircling hands technique (TTT) and the two-finger technique (TFT) for chest compression. Some devices have been designed to assist with infant CPR, but are often not readily available. Syringe plungers may serve as an alternative infant CPR assist device given their availability in most hospitals. In this study, we aimed to determine whether CPR using a syringe plunger could improve CPR quality measurements on the Resusci-Baby manikin compared with traditional methods of infant CPR. MethodsCompression area with a diameter of 1 to 2 cm is recommended in previous infant CPR device researches. In this is a randomized crossover manikin study, we examined the efficacy of the Syringe Plunger Technique (SPT) which uses the plunger of the 20 ml syringe with a 2 cm diameter flat piston, commonly available in hospital, for infant External Chest Compressions (ECC). Participants performed TTT, TFT and SPT ECC on Resusci® Baby QCPR® according to 2020 BLS guidelines. ResultsSixty healthcare providers participated in this project. The median (IQR) ECC depths in the TTT, TFT and SPT in the first minute were 41 mm (40–42), 40 mm (38–41) and 40 mm (39–41), respectively, with p < 0.001. The median (IQR) ECC recoil in the TTT, TFT and SPT groups in the first minute was 15% (1–93), 64% (18–96) and 53% (8–95), respectively, with p = 0.003. The result in the second minute had similar findings. The SPT had the best QCPR score and less fatigue. ConclusionThe performance of chest compression depth and re-rebound ratio was statistically different among the three groups. TTT has good ECC depth and depth accuracy but poor recoil. TFT is the complete opposite. SPT can achieve a depth close to TTT and has a good recoil performance as TFT. Regarding comprehensive performance, SPT obtains the highest QCPR score, and SPT is also less fatigued. SPT may be an effective alternative technique for infant CPR.

One hand open palm technique for infant CPR

BackgroundThe guideline recommended chest compression depth, rate, and recoil are essential factors for the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). A pediatric resuscitation collaboration recently demonstrated that healthcare providers fail to meet the American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines, with the greatest difficulty being in achieving chest compression depth targets in infants. We hypothesized that the use of the heel of one hand [open palm technique (OPT)] will increase chest compression depth in infants compared to standard CPR techniques [two-finger technique (TFT), two thumb-encircling hand technique (TTT)].MethodsA prospective, randomized, single-center study was completed using an infant manikin. Thirty pediatric critical care providers performed 2 min of CPR for each technique followed by 5 min of rest. Each participant completed a survey at the end that assessed the difficulty level in order to assess the feasibility of this new technique.ResultsThe mean chest compression depth for the OPT was significantly deeper compared to TFT (2.61± 0.63 cm vs. 2.25 ± 0.54 cm, p = 0.0004) but not significantly deeper compared to TTT (2.43 ± 0.46 cm, p = 0.0820). OPT was graded as the easiest technique, followed by TTT (2.20 ± 0.76 vs. 3.17 ± 0.95, p &amp;lt; 0.0001) and then TFT (3.38 ± 0.83, p &amp;lt; 0.0001).ConclusionThe use of OPT for infant CPR resulted in improved chest compression depth. OPT was considered the easiest technique compared to standard infant CPR techniques, thus making it feasible to perform. Importantly, all providers failed to meet the AHA infant chest compression depth goal of 4 cm, regardless of the technique. Future research is needed to optimize CPR technique and performance to achieve targeted chest compression depth in infants.

New chest compression method in infant resuscitation: Cross thumb technique

BackgroundThe two-thumb encircling technique (2TT) is superior to the two-finger technique (2FT) in infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), but there are difficulties in providing ventilation as soon as possible. We modified the 2TT to the cross-thumb technique (CTT) to maintain good CPR performance at the same position as 2FT. We aimed to compare the quality of chest compression and brief hands-off times in 2FT, 2TT, and CTT by a single rescuer using an infant CPR manikin model.MethodsThis study was designed as a prospective randomized controlled simulation-based study. We used the Resusci® Baby QCPR (Laerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway) as a simulated 3-month-old infant. Ventilation was performed by the mouth-to-mouth technique using a chest compression-to-ventilation ratio of 30:2 as a single rescuer. Data on CPR quality, such as locations, rates, depth and release of chest compressions, hands-off times, and proper ventilation, were recorded using the Resusci® Baby QCPR and SkillReporter. Also, the chest compression fraction (CCF) was automatically calculated.ResultsThe depth of chest compression in 2FT, 2TT, and CTT were 40.0 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 39.0, 41.0), 42.0 mm (IQR 41.0, 43.0), and 42.0 mm (IQR 41.0, 43.0), respectively. The depth of chest compression in 2FT was shallower than that in the other two techniques (P<0.05). CCF in 2FT, 2TT, and CTT were 73.9% (IQR 72.2, 75.6), 71.2% (IQR 67.2, 72.2) and 71.3% (IQR 67.7, 74.1), respectively. CCF was higher in 2FT than in the other two techniques (P<0.05). Correct location in 2FT, 2TT, and CTT were 99.0% (IQR 86.0, 100.0), 100.0% (IQR 97.0, 100.0) and 100.0% (IQR 99.0, 100.0), respectively. Correct location in CTT and 2TT was higher than that in 2FT. Performing CTT, the subjective pain and fatigue score were lower than other two technique.ConclusionA new chest compression technique, CTT was better in chest compression depth compared with 2FT and may be helpful in maintaining correct chest compression location with less pain and fatigue in infant CPR.

One-rescuer newborn CPR using a face mask or an i-gel supraglottic airway and two-finger compressions – A manikin study with cross-over desgin

IntroductionWhen unanticipated neonatal asphyxia occurs, it may be necessary for a single resuscitator to commence advanced resuscitation before others arrive. We hypothesised that a single rescuer can provide positive pressure ventilations and chest compressions using higher inflation pressures and better adherence to the recommended compression rate with an i-gel supraglottic airway than with a face mask. MethodA manikin-based cross-over study was conducted. Twenty-one midwives performed both positive pressure ventilation using a T-piece and chest compressions with the two-finger technique on a newborn manikin alone. They performed ventilation with a face mask or an i-gel. The peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) was set to 30 cmH2O. The actual PIPs were evaluated based on the values displayed on the manometer. The total amount of time taken to complete 30 cycles of three compressions and one ventilation was also evaluated. ResultsThe mean of the average PIP for each participant was significantly lower with a face mask than with an i-gel (17.3 ± 4.4 vs 28.2 ± 2.0 cmH2O, p < 0.00001). The amount of time taken to complete 30 cycles was significantly longer with a face mask than with an i-gel (66.2 ± 6.1 vs 60.6 ± 3.4 seconds, p < 0.0001). ConclusionDuring one-rescuer newborn resuscitation using a T-piece and the two-finger technique, the PIPs are consistently high and 30 cycles of CPR are better adhered to 60 seconds using an i-gel.

A Comparison between Three Different Techniques Considering Quality Skills, Fatigue and Hand Pain during a Prolonged Infant Resuscitation: A Cross-Over Study with Lifeguards.

The aim of the study was to compare the quality of CPR (Q-CPR), as well as the perceived fatigue and hand pain in a prolonged infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performed by lifeguards using three different techniques. A randomized crossover simulation study was used to compare three infant CPR techniques: the two-finger technique (TF); the two-thumb encircling technique (TTE) and the two-thumb-fist technique (TTF). 58 professional lifeguards performed three tests in pairs during a 20-min period of CPR. The rescuers performed compressions and ventilations in 15:2 cycles and changed their roles every 2 min. The variables of analysis were CPR quality components, rate of perceived exertion (RPE) and hand pain with numeric rating scale (NRS). All three techniques showed high Q-CPR results (TF: 86 ± 9%/TTE: 88 ± 9%/TTF: 86 ± 16%), and the TTE showed higher values than the TF (p = 0.03). In the RPE analysis, fatigue was not excessive with any of the three techniques (values 20 min between 3.2 for TF, 2.4 in TTE and 2.5 in TTF on a 10-point scale). TF reached a higher value in RPE than TTF in all the intervals analyzed (p < 0.05). In relation to NRS, TF showed significantly higher values than TTE and TTF (NRS minute 20 = TF 4.7 vs. TTE 2.5 & TTF 2.2; p < 0.001). In conclusion, all techniques have been shown to be effective in high-quality infant CPR in a prolonged resuscitation carried out by lifeguards. However, the two-finger technique is less efficient in relation to fatigue and hand pain compared with two-thumb technique (TF vs. TTF, p = 0.01).

Quantitative assessment of chest compression techniques on an infant manikin.

Current cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines recommend the two-finger technique (TFT) of chest compression (CC) in infants for a single rescuer. We hypothesized that healthcare providers cannot achieve adequate CC depth with TFT, even if using real-time visual feedback (RVF). This was a cross-over study, randomizing participants to perform three sets of 2-min continuous CC, comparing (i) TFT with RVF, (ii) the one-hand technique (OHT) without RVF, and (iii) OHT with RVF. A standard CPR trainer manikin of a 3-month-old infant and a monitor/defibrillator that displays and records the quantitative CC quality were used. We set a target compression depth of 40-50 mm and a target compression rate of 100-120/min. Data were analyzed using the Friedman test and Bonferroni correction. Statistical significance was defined as P-value of< 0.05. Fifty-nine healthcare providers participated in the study. The mean compression depth was 24 mm (interquartile range [IQR], 22-26 mm) in TFT with RVF and 43 mm (IQR, 38-48 mm) in OHT without RVF, P < 0.001. The proportion of adequate CC depth was 0% (IQR, 0-0%) in TFT with RVF, 22% (IQR, 5-54%) in OHT without RVF, and 62% (IQR, 29-83%) in OHT with RVF. The mean compression rate was within the target range in all three techniques. The TFT cannot produce the CC depth that meets the recommendation of the current CPR guidelines for an infant with RVF, whereas the OHT does.

Analysis of the adequacy of infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation according to chest compression technique based on the 2020 AHA guidelines

The quantitative and qualitative differences between the two-finger (TF) and two-thumb-encircling hands (TT) techniques were not sufficiently investigated to determine which is more effective for single-rescuer infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). As the type of chest compression (CC) technique can impact survival rates and prognoses of patients, this study aimed to compare the adequacy of single-rescuer infant CPR CC techniques and explore participants’ CPR experiences using an exploratory sequential mixed methods design. To assess the adequacy of CC and ventilation according to technique, 70 students who completed basic life support provider certification among students from emergency medical services and nursing departments of a single college performed CC using the TF and TT techniques (4 sets of 5 cycles with a ratio of 30:2) in simulation. Meanwhile, a numeric rating scale was used to measure fatigue. SPSS (v. 25.0, IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA) was used to analyze the collected data by frequency analysis, descriptive statistics, paired t-test, and repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). We conducted focus group interviews and analyzed CPR experiences. There were statistically significant differences between the TF and TT techniques in fatigue score (6.09 vs. 4.23 points, p &lt; 0.001), average hands-off time (6.77 vs. 7.43 s, p =0.001), mean ventilation volume (41.40 vs. 35.51 ml, p = 0.002), CC accuracy rate (65.89% vs. 77.11%, p = 0.011), mean CC rate (104.37 vs. 107.11 beats/min, p = 0.020), overall CPR score (78.26 vs. 84.37 points, p = 0.005), and overall compression score (82.60 vs. 92.54 points, p &lt; 0.001). Furthermore, we found significant differences over time in mean CC count (p = 0.030), mean ventilation volume (p = 0.042), and mean hands-off time (p = 0.029). Two categories (ambivalent attitudes and perception of pain) and five sub-categories were derived based on the results. In conclusion, as stated in the 2020 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines, both TF and TT techniques are useful for single-rescuer infant CPR. Overall, TT technique provides higher quality of compressions at the cost of fewer ventilations. We recommend future studies of more diverse groups and techniques.

Two-Thumb Technique Is Superior to Two-Finger Technique in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation of Simulated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Infants.

BackgroundTo compare the 2‐finger and 2‐thumb chest compression techniques on infant manikins in an out‐of‐hospital setting regarding efficiency of compressions, ventilation, and rescuer pain and fatigue.Methods and ResultsIn a randomized crossover design, 78 medical students performed 2 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with mouth‐to‐nose ventilation at a 30:2 rate on a Resusci Baby QCPR infant manikin (Laerdal, Stavanger, Norway), using a barrier device and the 2‐finger and 2‐thumb compression techniques. Frequency and depth of chest compressions, proper hand position, complete chest recoil at each compression, hands‐off time, tidal volume, and number of ventilations were evaluated through manikin‐embedded SkillReporting software. After the interventions, standard Likert questionnaires and analog scales for pain and fatigue were applied. The variables were compared by a paired t‐test or Wilcoxon test as suitable. Seventy‐eight students participated in the study and performed 156 complete interventions. The 2‐thumb technique resulted in a greater depth of chest compressions (42 versus 39.7 mm; P<0.01), and a higher percentage of chest compressions with adequate depth (89.5% versus 77%; P<0.01). There were no differences in ventilatory parameters or hands‐off time between techniques. Pain and fatigue scores were higher for the 2‐finger technique (5.2 versus 1.8 and 3.8 versus 2.6, respectively; P<0.01).ConclusionsIn a simulation of out‐of‐hospital, single‐rescuer infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the 2‐thumb technique achieves better quality of chest compressions without interfering with ventilation and causes less rescuer pain and fatigue.

Dominant versus non-dominant hand during simulated infant CPR using the two-finger technique: a randomised study

AimsThe aim of this randomised study was to compare the two-finger technique (TFT) performance using dominant hand (DH) and non-dominant hand (NH) during simulated infant CPR (iCPR). Methods24 participants performed 3-min iCPR using TFT with DH or NH followed by 3-min iCPR with their other hand. Perceived fatigue was rated using visual analogue scale. Primary outcomes - (i) difference between DH and NH for compression depth (CCD), compression rate (CCR), residual leaning (RL) and duty cycle (DC); (ii) difference between first and last 30 s of iCPR performance with DH and NH. Secondary outcomes - (i) perception of fatigue between DH and NH; (ii) relationship between perception of fatigue and iCPR performance. ResultsNo significant difference between DH and NH for any iCPR metric. CCR (DH: P = 0.02; NH: P = 0.004) and DC (DH: P = 0.04; NH: P < 0.001) were significantly different for the last 30 s for DH and NH. Perception of fatigue for NH (76.8 ± 13.4 mm) was significantly higher (t = −3.7, P < 0.001) compared to DH (62.8 ± 12.5 mm). No significant correlation between iCPR metrics and perception of fatigue for DH. However, a significant correlation was found for CCR (r = 0.43; P = 0.04) and RL (r = −0.48; P = 0.02) for NH. ConclusionNo difference in performance of iCPR with DH versus NH was determined. However, perception of fatigue is higher in NH and was related to CCR and RL, with no effect on quality of performance. Based on our results, individuals performing iCPR can offer similar quality of infant chest compressions regardless of the hand used or the perception of fatigue, under the conditions explored in this study.

Effect of two different chest compression techniques on ventilation during neonatal resuscitation.

To assess tidal volume (Vt) and minute ventilation (MV) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with two different chest compressions techniques: two-finger (TFT) or two-thumb technique (TTT) in a neonatal model. Vt and MV were continuously measured during consecutive periods of resuscitation in an intubated manikin. Thirty participants performed the two compression techniques in a random order for 2-min periods while performing positive pressure ventilation using a T-piece resuscitator (TPR) or a self-inflating bag (SIB). Vt during CPR with TFT was significantly higher than TTT with either TPR: 44.9 ± 4.3 vs 39.2 ± 5.4 ml (p < 0.001) or SIB: 39.2 ± 5.7 vs 35.6 ± 6.5 ml (p < 0.023). Similarly MV was significantly higher in TFT than TTT with either mode: 1346 ± 130 vs 1175 ± 162 ml/min, respectively, with TPR (p < 0.001) and 1177 ± 170 vs 1069 ± 196 ml/min with SIB (p < 0.03). Chest compressions during CPR using the TFT achieved higher Vt and MV than TTT in this model of neonatal resuscitation.

Effectiveness of Smartwatch Guidance for High-Quality Infant Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Simulation Study.

Background and objectives: As in adults, the survival rates and neurological outcomes after infant Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are closely related to the quality of resuscitation. This study aimed to demonstrate that using a smartwatch as a haptic feedback device increases the quality of infant CPR performed by medical professionals. Materials and methods: We designed a prospective, randomized, case-crossover simulation study. The participants (n = 36) were randomly allocated to two groups: control first group and smartwatch first group. Each CPR session consisted of 2 min of chest compressions (CCs) using the two-finger technique (TFT), 2 min of rest, and 2 min of CCs using the two-thumb encircling hands technique (TTHT). Results: The primary outcome was the variation in the “proportion of optimal chest compression duration” and “compression rate” between the smartwatch-assisted and non-smartwatch-assisted groups. The secondary outcome was the variation in the “compression depth” between two groups. The proportion of optimal CC duration was significantly higher in the smartwatch-assisted group than in the non-smartwatch-assisted group. The absolute difference from 220 was much smaller in the smartwatch-assisted group (218.02) than in the non-smartwatch-assisted group (226.59) (p-Value = 0.018). Conclusion: This study demonstrated the haptic feedback system using a smartwatch improves the quality of infant CPR by maintaining proper speed and depth regardless of the compression method used.

Two-Thumb or Two-Finger Technique in Infant Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation by a Single Rescuer? A Meta-Analysis with GOSH Analysis.

Out-of-hospital infant cardiopulmonary arrest is a fatal and uncommon event. High mortality rates and poor neurological outcomes may be improved by early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The ongoing debate over two different infant CPR techniques, the two-thumb (TT) and the two-finger (TF) technique, has remained, especially in terms of the adequate compression depth, compression rate, and hands-off time. In this article, we searched three major databases, PubMed, EMBASE (Excerpta Medica database), and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), for randomized control trials which compared the outcomes of interest between the TT and TF techniques in infant CPR. The results showed that the TT technique was associated with higher proportion of adequate compression depth (Mean difference (MD): 19.99%; 95%, Confidence interval (CI): 9.77 to 30.22; p < 0.01) than the TF technique. There was no significant difference in compression rate and hands-off time. In our conclusion, the TT technique is better in terms of adequate compression depth than the TF technique, without significant differences in compression rate and hands-off time.

Analysis of Chest-Compression Depth and Full Recoil in Two Infant Chest-Compression Techniques Performed by a Single Rescuer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Pediatric cardiac arrest is associated with high mortality and permanent neurological injury. We aimed to compare the effects of the two-thumb (TT) and two-finger (TF) techniques in infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performed by a single rescuer. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL for randomized control trials published before December 2019. Studies comparing the TT and TF techniques in infant CPR were included for meta-analysis. Relevant information was extracted for methodological assessment. Twelve studies were included. The TT technique was associated with deeper chest-compression depth (mean difference: 4.71 mm; 95% confidence interval: 3.61 to 5.81; p < 0.001) compared with the TF technique. The TF technique was better in terms of the proportion of complete chest recoil (mean difference: −11.73%; 95% confidence interval: −20.29 to −3.17; p = 0.007). CPR was performed on a manikin model, and the application of the results to real human beings may be limited. The TT technique was superior to the TF technique in terms of chest-compression depth, but with inferior chest full recoil. Future investigations should focus on modifying the conventional TT technique to generate greater compression depth and achieve complete chest recoil.

Differences in the performance of resuscitation according to the resuscitation guideline terminology during infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation: "Approximately 4 cm" versus "at least one-third the anterior-posterior diameter of the chest".

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of resuscitation guideline terminology on the performance of infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). A total of 40 intern or resident physicians conducted 2-min CPR with the two-finger technique (TFT) and two-thumb technique (TT) on a simulated infant cardiac arrest model with a 1-day interval. They were randomly assigned to Group A or B. The participants of Group A conducted CPR with the chest compression depth (CCD) target of "approximately 4 cm" and those of Group B conducted CPR with the CCD target of "at least one-third the anterior-posterior diameter of the chest". Single rescuer CPR was performed with a 15:2 compression to ventilation ratio on the floor. In both chest compression techniques, the average CCD of Group B was significantly deeper than that of Group A (TFT: 41.0 [range, 39.3-42.0] mm vs. 36.5 [34.0-37.9] mm, P = 0.002; TT: 42.0 [42.0-43.0] mm vs. 37.0 [35.3-38.0] mm, P < 0.001). Adequacy of CCD also showed similar results (Group B vs. A; TFT: 99% [82-100%] vs. 29% [12-58%], P = 0.001; TT: 100% [100-100%] vs. 28% [8-53%], P < 0.001). Using the CCD target of "at least one-third the anterior-posterior diameter of the chest" resulted in deep and adequate chest compressions during simulated infant CPR in contrast to the CCD target of "approximately 4 cm". Therefore, changes in the terminology used in the guidelines should be considered to improve the quality of CPR. Clinical Research Information Service; cris.nih.go.kr/cris/en (Registration number: KCT0003486).

Development and Evaluation of a New Chest Compression Technique for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Infants.

We designed the newly developed flexed two-finger chest compression technique for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in infants to increase the quality of chest compression by considering the advantages and disadvantages of the two-thumb encircling hand technique and conventional two-finger technique. The aim of the study is to compare the performance of the flexed two-finger technique and the currently used two-thumb technique or two-finger technique for infant CPR. A total of 42 doctors conducted 2-min single-rescuer CPR on a cardiac arrest infant model using the two-thumb technique followed, in a random order, by the two-finger technique and the flexed two-finger technique. Although the ratio of the adequate compression depth was highest in the two-thumb technique, followed by the flexed two-finger technique and two-finger technique (100% [98-100] vs. 99% [80-100] vs. 76% [42-95], respectively, P < 0.001), the hand-off time of the two-thumb technique was significantly longer than in the two-finger technique and flexed two-finger technique (31s [28-35] vs. 29s [27-32] vs. 29s [26-32], respectively, P < 0.001). The number of total chest compressions of the two-thumb technique was significantly lower than in the two-finger technique and flexed two-finger technique (150 [148-159] vs. 159 [149-173] vs. 162 [150-172], respectively, P < 0.001). The newly developed chest compression technique could provide adequate compression depth without increasing the hand-off time during single-rescuer infant CPR.Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Service, KCT0002730.

Effect of metronome guidance on infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of metronome guidance on the performance of infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). A total of 36 medical doctors conducted a 2-min single rescuer CPR with the two-finger technique (TFT) or two-thumb encircling hands technique (TT) on an infant manikin without metronome guidance (baseline test). After completing the baseline test, the participants were assigned to either a "guidance group" or "non-guidance group." The guidance group performed CPR with a high-pitched sound at 110 beats/min from a metronome (test 2), while the non-guidance group performed 2-min CPR without metronome guidance (test 1). Comparison between the results of tests 1 and 2 showed that the ratio of adequate chest compression rate was significantly different in both the TFT (73% [34-93] vs. 98% [95-99], P < 0.001) and the TT (53% [32-79] vs. 99% [98-100], P = 0.010). Other parameters including average depth and the ratio of adequate depth were not significantly different between tests 1 and 2 in both the TFT and TT.Conclusion: Metronome guidance improves the adequacy of chest compression rate during infant CPR without affecting chest compression depth in both the TFT and TT.Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Service, KCT0002735 What is Known: • The rate of chest compressions can be optimized by the use of metronome guidance in pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). • An adverse effect of deteriorating chest compression depth was found while using a metronome guidance during adult CPR simulations. What is New: • The metronome guidance improved the adequacy of the chest compression rate during infant CPR without affecting other parameters including average depth and the ratio of adequate depth in both the two-finger chest compression technique and two-thumb encircling hand technique.

Does the Number of Fingers on the Bag Influence Volume Delivery? A Randomized Model Study of Bag-Valve-Mask Ventilation in Infants.

We sought to compare the effectiveness of two versus five fingers used for bag-valve-mask (BVM) ventilation on effective tidal volume (VTeff) delivery in an infant resuscitation model. In a randomised cross-over study, 40 healthcare professionals ventilated a modified leak-free infant resuscitation manikin with both two and five fingers, using a self-inflating bag. The delivered and effective tidal volumes, ventilation rate, and mask leak were measured and recorded using a respiratory function monitor. We found no significant differences in the VTeff (five-finger 61.7 ± 23.9 vs. two-finger 58.8 ± 16.6 mL; p = 0.35) or ventilatory minute volume (2.71 ± 1.59 vs. 2.76 ± 1.24 L/min; p = 0.40) of both BVM ventilation techniques. However, there was an increase in the delivered tidal volume (VTdel) and mask leak when using the five-finger technique compared with the two-finger technique (VTdel 96.1 ± 19.4 vs. 87.7 ± 15.5 mL; p < 0.01; and mask leak 34.6 ± 23.0 vs. 30.0 ± 21.0%; p = 0.02). Although the five-finger technique was associated with an increased mask leak, the number of fingers used during the BVM ventilation had no effect on VTeff in an infant resuscitation model.

A novel infant chest compression assist device using a palm rather than fingers: A randomized crossover trial

We developed a novel compression assist device (palm presser) to perform compressions using a palm in infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). We hypothesized that the palm presser will increase compression depth without increasing hands-off time and will reduce rescuer fatigue compared with two-finger technique (TFT).

A Novel Infant Chest Compression Assist Device Using a Palm Rather Than Fingers: A Randomized Crossover Trial

Objective: We developed a novel compression assist device (palm presser) to perform chest compressions using a palm in infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). We hypothesized that the palm presser will increase compression depth without increasing hands-off time and will reduce rescuer fatigue compared with the two-finger technique (TFT).Methods: In this randomized crossover manikin trial, participants performed two minutes of CPR with a 30:2 compression:ventilation ratio using the palm presser and the TFT in randomized sequence on an infant manikin. CPR parameters, including compression depth and hands-off time, were collected to compare CPR quality between the palm presser and the TFT. The linear mixed-effect model was used to control the carryover effect of a crossover design in the analysis of CPR parameters. To evaluate rescuer fatigue, we compared changes in compression depth over time and calculated the odds of sufficiently deep compressions over time between the two groups.Results: The palm presser resulted in greater mean compression depth (41.5 ± 1.6 mm vs. 36.8 ± 5.5 mm, p < 0.001), greater sufficiently deep compressions (80.9 ± 27.8% vs. 42.4 ± 35.4%, p < 0.001), and better correct hand position (99.9 ± 0.5% vs. 83.9 ± 25.3%, p = 0.013) than the TFT. Total compressions, compression rate, total ventilations, volume of ventilations, and hands-off time were not significantly different between the two groups. The mean change in compression depth over time was greater with the TFT than with the palm presser (regression coefficient: −0.024 [95% CI −0.030 to −0.018] vs. −0.004 [95% CI −0.006 to −0.002]). The odds of a compression depth greater than 40 mm increased 2.8 times (95% CI 2.2 to 3.4) with the TFT during the first minute compared with the last minute, whereas the corresponding odds ratio when using the palm presser was not significantly different in the first and last minutes (OR: 1.2 [95% CI 0.9 to 1.5]).Conclusions: Compression with palm pressers resulted in greater compression depth without increasing hands-off time and reduced rescuer fatigue compared with compression with the TFT in simulated infant CPR with manikins.