Tunnel Position Research Articles

Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) techniques have substantially evolved over the past several decades, driven by evidence that nonanatomic techniques increase the risk for instability, loss of motion, surgical failure, and posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Early techniques used transtibial femoral tunnel drilling, although improved understanding of the anatomy and biomechanics has led to independent femoral tunnel. Anatomic ACLR requires careful consideration of the native ACL dimensions and orientation. Although there is significant variation between patients, understanding of anatomic patterns allows for reliable identification of the ACL footprints and appropriate tunnel positioning, particularly in chronic injuries where the remanent ACL stump is degraded or absent. The femoral tunnel should be placed low and posterior on the lateral femoral condyle using the lateral intercondylar and bifurcate ridges as landmarks. The center of the tibial footprint can be determined by referencing the medial tibial spine and posterior border of anterior horn of lateral meniscus. Measurement of the dimensions of the native ACL and intercondylar notch is also critical for determining graft size and minimizing the risk of impingement, with a goal of reconstructing 50% to 80% of the tibial footprint area. Clinical outcome studies have demonstrated superior anteroposterior and rotatory knee stability with low surgical revision rates (reported between 3% and 5%). By adhering to the principles of anatomic ACLR, surgeons can produce an appropriately sized and located graft for the individual patient, thereby best restoring native knee kinematics and maximizing function. The aim of this infographic is to highlight essential features of anatomic ACLR techniques, which a focus on the native anatomy and surgical planning to achieve an anatomic ACLR.

An analytical approximate solution for stress and displacement around a shallow circular tunnel excavated under concave slope topography

For shallow buried tunnels under slope, overloading on the ground surface and unloading of excavation both significantly influence the stability of the tunnel surrounding rock and slope. This study proposes an analytical approximate solution for the stress and displacement around shallow buried circular tunnel under slope boundary. In derivation process, the original problem is divided into two models: Model A is a slope plane without any holes subjected to gravity and surcharge load along the ground surface, and Model B is a tunnel contained in a slope plane loaded by released stresses along the tunnel boundary. Furthermore, Model B is decomposed into another two models: Model B1 represents a slope without holes subjected to virtual surface force along the ground surface, and Model B2 is an infinite domain containing a tunnel loaded by another virtual surface force along its boundary. Two sets of virtual surface forces are then achieved by an iterative calculation. The solution, which strictly meets all stress boundary and compatibility conditions of the original problem, are ultimately solved by superposing the solution of Models A, B1 and B2, respectively obtained by the method proposed by the authors (Models A, B1) and complex variable theory (Model B2). The convergence of iteration process and good agreement between the derived and numerical results under the same assumptions verify the correctness of the proposed solution. Furthermore, a parametric investigation is performed to investigate the influence of surcharge load position, slope topography and tunnel position on the stress and displacement around the tunnel and near the ground. The proposed solution is of great value for the conceptual understanding of mechanical behavior of shallow tunneling in slope terrain and for verifying the numerical models. Moreover, the solution is useful for the preliminary design of tunnels at shallow depth under slope topography.

Distribution of bone tunnel positions and treatment efficacy of bone landmark positioning method for anatomical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a case control study

BackgroundThis study aimed to investigate the distribution of femoral tunnel and explore the influences of bone tunnel positions on knee functions. The bone landmark positioning method was used to position the femoral tunnel during the anatomical reconstruction surgery in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture.MethodsData of patients who underwent anatomical reconstruction of the ACL between January 2015 and July 2018, were retrospectively analyzed. The distribution of the femoral tunnel was recorded on 3-D CT after surgery. The tunnel positions were classified into good and poor position groups based on whether the position was in the normal range (24–37% on the x-axis and 28–43% on the y-axis). The Lysholm and IKDC scores, KT-1000 side-to-side difference, pivot shift test and Lachman test results of the knee joints were recorded, and then the differences in knee joint functions between the two groups were analyzed.Results84 eligible patients (84 knees) were finally included in this study. Twenty-two and 62 of the patients were categorized in the good and poor position groups, respectively, and the rate of good position was 26.2%. The distribution of bone tunnel was as follows: (x-axis) deep position in 10 patients (12%), normal position in 58 patients (69%), and shallow position in 16 patients (19%); (y-axis) high position in 54 patients (64%), normal position in 26 patients (31%), and low position in 4 patients (5%). 1 year later, the Lysholm and IKDC scores were significantly better in the good position group (P < 0.05), the KT-1000 side to side difference, the pivot shift test and Lachman test results were better in the good position group (P < 0.05).ConclusionsThe bone tunnels were found to be distributed in and beyond the normal range using the bone landmark method to position the femoral tunnel in the single-bundle anatomical reconstruction of ACL, while the rate of good bone tunnel position was low. The knee joint function scores and stability were lower in patients with poor position of the femoral tunnel.

Effectiveness of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with personalized femoral locator based on apex of deep cartilage

To investigate the effectiveness of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction assisted by personalized femoral locator based on the apex of deep cartilage (ADC) combined with patient imaging data. Between January 2021 and January 2022, a total of 40 patients with primary ACL rupture were selected and randomly divided into study group (ACL reconstruction assisted by personalized femoral locator based on ADC) and control group (ACL reconstruction assisted by intraoperative fluoroscopy and traditional femoral locator), with 20 cases in each group. There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, affected side, cause of injury, and preoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lyshlom score, and Tegner score between the two groups ( P>0.05). IKDC score, Lyshlom score, and Tegner score were used to evaluate the functional recovery of the affected knee before operation and at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation. CT scan and three-dimensional reconstruction were performed before and after operation to measure the horizontal distance from ADC to the anterior cartilage margin (L) and the horizontal distance from ADC to the center of the femoral canal (I), and the anteroposterior position of the bone canal (R) was calculated by I/L; the distance from the center to the distal cartilage margin (D) was measured on the two-dimensional cross section; the R value and D value were compared between the two groups. The operation time of the study group was significantly less than that of the control group [ MD=-6.90 (-8.78, -5.03), P<0.001]. The incisions of the two groups healed by first intention, and no complication such as intra-articular infection, nerve injury, and deep vein thrombosis of lower limbs occurred. There was no significant difference in the R value and D value between the preoperative simulated positioning and the actual intraoperative positioning in the study group [ MD=0.52 (-2.85, 3.88), P=0.758; MD=0.36 (-0.39, 1.11), P=0.351]. There was no significant difference in the actual intraoperative positioning R value and D value between the study group and the control group [ MD=1.01 (-2.57, 4.58), P=0.573; MD=0.24 (-0.34, 0.82), P=0.411]. The patients in both groups were followed up 12-13 months (mean, 12.4 months). The IKDC score, Lysholm score, and Tegner score of the two groups increased gradually with time, and there were significant differences between pre- and post-operation ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the scores between the two groups at each time point after operation ( P>0.05). The personalized femoral locator based on ADC can accurately assist the femoral tunnel positioning in ACL reconstruction, which can shorten the operation time when compared with traditional surgical methods, and achieve satisfactory early effectiveness.

Femoral Tunnel Malposition, Increased Lateral Tibial Slope, and Decreased Notch Width Index Are Risk Factors for Non-Traumatic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Failure

To identify risk factors for patients who sustain nontraumatic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) failure. A retrospective analysis was performed on patients undergoing primary or revision ACLR in our institution between 2010 and 2018. Patients sustaining insidious-onset knee instability without history of trauma were identified as nontraumatic ACLR failure and assigned to the study group. The control group of subjects who showed no evidence of ACLR failure with minimum 48-month follow-up were matched in a 1:1 ratio based on age, sex, and body mass index. Anatomic parameters including tibial slope (lateral [LTS], medial [MTS]); tibial plateau subluxation (lateral [LTPsublx], medial [MTPsublx]); notch width index (NWI); and lateral femoral condyle ratio were measured with magnetic resonance imaging or radiography. Graft tunnel position was assessed using 3-dimensional computed tomography and reported in 4 dimensions: deep-shallow ratio (DS ratio) and high-low ratio for femoral tunnel, anterior-posterior ratio and medial-lateral ratio for tibial tunnel. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability were evaluated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Patients' demographic data, surgical factors, anatomic parameters, and tunnel placements were compared between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to discriminate and assess the identified risk factors. A total of 52 patients who sustained nontraumatic ACLR failure were included and matched with 52 control subjects. Compared to patients with intact ACLR, those who sustained nontraumatic ACLR failure showed significantly increased LTS, LTPsublx, MTS, and deceased NWI (all P < .001). Moreover, the average tunnel position in the study group was significantly more anterior (P < .001) and superior (P= .014) at the femoral side and more lateral (P= .002) at the tibial side. Multivariate regression analysis identified LTS (odds ratio [OR]= 1.313; P= .028), DS ratio (OR= 1.091; P= .002), and NWI (OR= 0.813; P= .040) as independent predictors of nontraumatic ACLR failure. LTS appeared to be the best independent predictive factor (area under the curve [AUC]= 0.804; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.721-0.887), followed by DS ratio (AUC= 0.803; 95% CI, 0.717-0.890), and NWI (AUC= 0.756; 95% CI, 0.664-0.847). The optimal cutoff values were 6.7° for increased LTS (sensitivity= 0.615, specificity= 0.923); 37.4% for increased DS ratio (sensitivity= 0.673, specificity= 0.885); and 26.4% for decreased NWI (sensitivity= 0.827, specificity= 0.596). Intraobserver and interobserver reliability was good to excellent, with ICCs ranging from 0.754 to 0.938 for all radiographical measurements. Increased LTS, decreased NWI, and femoral tunnel malposition are predictive risk factors for nontraumatic ACLR failure. Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Association Between Tunnel Position, Tunnel Angle, Graft Signal Intensity, and Graft Thickness in the Reconstructed Posterior Cruciate Ligament

Background: An appropriate tunnel position, tunnel angle, and tunnel-graft angle are important factors for maintaining the stability and mechanical properties of a posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) graft. Purpose: To evaluate the association between tunnel position, tunnel angle, graft signal intensity ratio (SIR), and graft thickness after remnant-preserving PCL reconstruction. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Included were patients who had undergone remnant-preserving single-bundle PCL reconstruction using a tibialis anterior allograft between March 2014 and September 2020 and who had minimum 12-month postoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans. Tunnel position and angle were evaluated via 3-dimensional computed tomography, and their association with graft SIR on both the femoral and the tibial sides was determined. Graft thickness and SIR at 3 areas of the graft were evaluated and compared, and their association with tunnel-graft angle was also determined. Results: Overall, 50 knees (50 patients; 43 male, 7 female) were included. The mean time to postoperative magnetic resonance imaging was 25.8 ± 15.8 months. The mean SIR of the graft’s midportion was higher compared with that of the proximal and distal portions ( P = .028 and P &lt; .001, respectively), and the SIR of the proximal portion was higher compared with that of the distal portion ( P = .002). The femoral tunnel-graft angle was more acute than the tibial tunnel-graft angle ( P = .004). A more anteriorly and distally located femoral tunnel led to a less acute femoral tunnel-graft angle ( P = .005) and a decreased SIR of the proximal portion ( P = .040), and a more laterally located tibial tunnel was associated with a less acute tibial tunnel-graft angle ( P = .024) and a reduced SIR of the distal portion ( P = .044). The mean thicknesses of the graft’s midportion and distal portion were larger than that of the proximal portion ( P &lt; .001). The SIR of the graft’s midportion was positively correlated with its thickness ( r = 0.321; P = .023). Conclusion: The SIR of the proximal portion of the graft around the femoral tunnel was higher than that of the distal portion around the tibial tunnel. An anteriorly and distally positioned femoral tunnel and a laterally positioned tibial tunnel resulted in less acute tunnel-graft angles that were associated with decreased signal intensity.

Paper 42: A Novel Machine Learning (ML) Algorithm to Predict Outcomes after Revision ACLR (rACLR) in the Multicenter Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Study (MARS) Cohort

Objectives: The multicenter anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction study (MARS) Group has implicated several factors that influence revision anterior cruciate ligament (rACLR) outcomes. As machine learning (ML) becomes increasingly utilized in the orthopaedic literature, the application of ML methodology to MARS cohort data presents a valuable opportunity to translate data into patient-specific insights. This study sought to apply novel ML methodology to the MARS cohort data in order to determine 1) an optimal predictive model of rACLR graft failure and 2) features that are most predictive of rACLR graft failure in context of the predictive model. Methods: The MARS Group of 83 surgeons and 52 sites prospectively enrolled a cohort of patients undergoing rACLR. Patients were followed up at 2 and 6 years postoperatively regarding patient-reported outcomes (PROs), additional surgeries, and incidence of graft failure. Surgeon reported intraoperative findings and preoperative radiographic measures were obtained. Data was preprocessed and 381 demographic, clinical, and surgical features were used to build five machine learning models predictive of graft failure at 6 years postoperatively. Models used included traditional logistic regression (LR), XGBoost, Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, and a validated ensemble algorithm, AutoPrognosis (AP). Validated performance metrics for binary outcome prediction models were used to determine discriminative power and calibration. Individual feature importance was calculated for the highest performing models using partial dependence and perturbation-based feature importance. Results: The cohort included 831 patients who completed six year follow up, and 5.8% (n=48) of whom experienced graft failure. While all models had moderate to good concordance, AP demonstrated the highest discriminative power compared to other models (Model: AUROC | AP: 0.722 | Random Forest: 0.621 | Gradient Boosting: 0.654 | XGBoost: 0.690 | Logistic Regression: 0.630). The AP model was well-calibrated, with calibration scores similar to the other studied models (Model: Brier Score | AP: 0.054 | Random Forest: 0.054 | Gradient Boosting: 0.059 | XGBoost: 0.059 | Logistic Regression: 0.102). Features deemed important for AP differ from those for LR model performance. For AP, partial dependence feature importance calculations demonstrated the following top five contributors to model predictive ability: surgeon years of experience, prior femoral tunnel position measured via preoperative radiograph, compromised prior ACLR femoral tunnel position and size, and baseline patient age. Similarly, AP perturbation-based calculations showed the following top five features that contribute most to the AUROC performance: baseline patient age, current ACLR graft type, years since previous ACLR, prior ACLR femoral tunnel position, and prior tibial tunnel position on sagittal view preoperative radiographs. Perturbation-based calculations showed the following top five features that contribute most to the AUPRC performance: current ACLR graft type, baseline patient age, prior tibial tunnel position on sagittal view preoperative radiographs, previous ipsilateral medial meniscus repair, and baseline SF-36 subscale scores for patient vitality. Other leading contributors to model predictive ability included baseline PROs including SF-36 subscale scores for physical function, mental health and composite mental health, KOOS quality of life, WOMAC pain, and MARX activity rating scores. Conclusions: Of the studied models in this preliminary analysis, AP appears to most accurately predict rACLR graft failure. These findings build on prior studies, identifying key surgical, clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported factors contributing to the model’s ability to predict rACLR graft failure at 6 years postoperatively. Further work includes creation of a clinical risk calculator using important feature inputs, and the use of survival modeling to determine risk scores at various postoperative time points.

Accuracy of Femoral Tunnel Placement between Anteromedial and Anterolateral Visualisation Portals in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - Outcomes of a CT based Cross-Sectional Study.

Anatomical femoral tunnel placement is critical for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Tunnel placement may vary with different surgical techniques. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of femoral tunnel placement between the Anteromedial (AM) and Anterolateral (AL) visualisation portals on post-operative CT scans among a cohort of ACLR patients. This cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2018 to March 2020 after obtaining ethics clearance. Patients who went for arthroscopic ACLR in our institute were divided into an AM (group 1) and an AL (group 2) based on the visualisation portal for creating the femoral tunnel and a 3D CT scan was done. The femoral tunnel position was calculated in deep to shallow and high to low direction using the Bernard Hertel grid. Femoral tunnel angle was measured in the 2D coronal image. Statistical analysis was done with the data collected. Fifty patients with an average age of 26.36 (18-55) years ±7.216 SD were enrolled in the study. In this study, the AM technique was significantly more accurate (p<0.01) than the AL technique in terms of femoral tunnel angle. Furthermore, the deep to the shallow position was significantly (p= 0.018) closer to normative values, as determined by the chi-square test. The chances of error in tunnel angle in femoral condyle are 2.6 times greater in the AL technique (minimal clinical difference). To conclude, in ACLR the anteromedial visualisation portal can facilitate accurate femoral tunnel placement compared to the anterolateral visualisation portal.

Accuracy of Femoral Tunnel Localization With Mixed Reality Technology-Assisted Single-Bundle ACL Reconstruction.

It is clinically challenging to accurately drill femoral and tibial tunnels to reconstruct the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Mixed reality (MR) technology, a further development of virtual reality technology, presents virtual scene information in real time and establishes an interactive feedback information loop among the real world, the virtual world, and the user. The purpose of this study was to investigate the structural and early clinical outcomes of ACL reconstruction assisted by MR technology. It was hypothesized that MR technology would improve the accuracy of tunnel localization. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Included were 44 patients at a single institution who underwent arthroscopic single-bundle ACL reconstruction between June 2020 and March 2022. Reconstruction with the aid of MR technology was performed in 21 patients (MR group), and conventional arthroscopic reconstruction was performed in 23 patients. Postoperatively, the parameters related to the bone tunnel positioning were compared by computed tomography imaging with 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction, and 12-month postoperative clinical outcomes were assessed with the Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee scores. There was no statistically significant difference in projection angles in the coronal, axial, or sagittal plane between the preoperative virtually created tunnel guide pin and the actual tunnel (P > .05 for all). In the MR group, the center of the femoral tunnel exit was closer to the apex of the lateral femoral condyle along the proximal-distal axis (14.07 ± 4.12 vs 17.49 ± 6.24 mm for the conventional group; P < .05) and the graft bending angle was lower (117.71° ± 8.08° vs 127.81° ± 11.91° for the conventional group; P < .05). The scatterplot of the femoral tunnel location distribution showed that the entrance and exit points in the MR group were more concentrated and closer to the ideal location of the preoperative design than in the conventional group. Patients in both groups had significant preoperative-to-postoperative improvement based on outcome scores (P < .001 for all), with no significant difference between groups. ACL reconstruction with the aid of MR technology allowed for more accurate positioning and orientation of the femoral tunnel during surgery when compared with conventional reconstruction.

Poster 129: Biomechanical Evaluation of the Isometry of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Grafts Fixed at Non-Anatomic Femoral Insertion Points

Objectives: In MPFL reconstruction surgery, achieving perfect placement of the femoral tunnel intraoperatively is difficult. An understanding of the effects femoral tunnel malpositioning has on graft isometry is crucial to minimizing instability or overconstraint which leads to anterior knee pain, increased patellofemoral contact pressures, or graft failure. The purpose of this study was to identify differences in MPFL reconstruction graft isometry with femoral tunnel malpositioning, specifically evaluating isometry differences as the femoral position is moved anterior, posterior, proximal, and distal relative to the femoral radiographic landmark of the MPFL, Schottle’s point. Methods: A biomechanical study evaluating 11 fresh frozen cadaveric knees was conducted. Non-elastic suture, used as an MPFL graft analogue, was anchored at Schottle’s point with the knee at 30° of flexion, and at 5 mm and 10 mm anterior, posterior, superior, and distal to Schottle’s point. A draw wire displacement sensor was used to evaluate length changes of the MPFL graft analogue through 0-120° of knee flexion. Knee flexion position was continuously measured using a motion tracking system. Pairwise t-tests with Bonferroni corrections were used to compare isometry between Schottle’s point and non- anatomic femoral insertion points. Results: Grafts placed at Schottle’s point demonstrated mild anisometry with tightening in extension and loosening in flexion. Similarly, grafts placed distally and posteriorly also demonstrated tightening in extension and loosening in flexion. Grafts placed anteriorly and proximally demonstrated tightening in flexion. Mean and range of total draw wire excursion over full ROM across specimens is shown in Figure 1. The mean draw wire length was found to be greater with further displacement from Schottle’s point in all directions but posterior. Pairwise comparisons relative to Schottle’s point found grafts placed in the proximal or distal direction demonstrated significant differences in MPFL excursion, while grafts placed in the anterior or posterior direction did not (10 mm proximal: 0.36 (p=0.028), 5 mm distal: 0.14 (p=0.012), 10 mm distal: 0.22 (p&lt;0.001)) (Table 1). Conclusions: In order to minimize the risk of graft tightening during knee flexion, if deviating from Schottle’s point, it is safest to err posterior or distal in femoral tunnel position. Travel away from Schottle’s point in the proximal or distal direction has the greatest effects on graft isometry. The greatest risk of overconstraint and graft tightening in flexion is seen with proximal placement of the femoral insertion point.

Poster 132: Femoral length on lateral knee radiographs influences accuracy of radiographic landmarks for MPFC reconstruction

Objectives: Accuracy of femoral tunnel positioning is critical during medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC) reconstruction, as even 5mm of malpositioning has been associated with altered patellofemoral contact pressures. To help identify the appropriate position for femoral tunnel placement, Schottle and others have described radiographic landmarks to identify the MPFC footprint on lateral knee radiographs. These measurements are based on an extension of the posterior cortical line, which can vary based on the length of the femur visible on the radiograph. Because the scope of view can vary between intraoperative imaging modalities, the aim of this study was to assess the effect of femoral length on the accuracy of radiographic landmarks of the MPFC. Methods: In 9 unpaired cadaveric knees, the MPFC footprint was exposed on the medial femur, and the proximal and distal boundaries of the footprint were marked. Lateral fluoroscopic images of the knee were obtained and assessed in 1 cm length increments, beginning 1cm proximal to the posterior condyle and continuing proximally to a femoral length of 8 cms. The MPFC midpoint was described on each image relative to the posterior cortical line of the femur and a line perpendicular to this line, relative to the proximal margin of the posterior condyle. Linear regression analysis was used to assess the effect of femoral length on the radiographic position of the MPFC. ROC curve analysis and Delong test were used, and the minimum amount of femoral length required on radiographs to accurately identify an anatomic femoral tunnel was determined using Youden’s J statistic. Results: Using the posterior cortical line as a reference, the radiographic description of the MPFC footprint moved anteriorly with decreasing femoral length on the radiographs, particularly at 4cm and less. However, no proximal-distal change was seen in relation to the line through the proximal margin of the posterior condyle with changing femoral lengths. Linear regression analysis showed a significant relationship between the femoral length and anterior radiographic position of the MPFC on radiographs (R = 0.461, R2 = 0.212, B= -0.636, p &lt; 0.001). The slope coefficient was -0.636 mm, indicating that for every cm decrease in femoral length, the actual anatomic footprint of the MPFC moves anteriorly by 0.636 mm in relation to the posterior cortical line. Furthermore, ROC curve analysis revealed that a minimum of 4 cm of femoral length on lateral radiographs is required to accurately localize the footprint of the MPFC (AUC 0.80; sensitivity 76.7 %; specificity 69 %; p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: The radiographic landmarks for the MPFC femoral footprint can change depending on the length of the distal femur visible on radiographs. We found that at least 4cm of the femoral shaft should be visible for the radiographic landmarks to be accurate. As fluoroscopy is frequently used intraoperatively for MPFC reconstruction, our findings may serve as a guide for accurate femoral tunnel placement.

Analysis of the dust-methane two-phase coupling blowdown effect at different air duct positions in an excavation anchor synchronous tunnel.

Bolter miners are being increasingly used. Unfortunately, this mining technology causes a considerable amount of air pollution (especially by methane and dust) during excavation. In this study, the multiphase coupling field of airflow-dust-methane for different distances between the pressure air outlet and the working face (Lp) was simulated by using the FLUENT software. The migration law of pollutants in the multiphase coupling field was analyzed, and the distance parameters between the pressure air outlet and the working face were optimized. Finally, the simulation results were verified based on the field measurement results. We found that the blowdown effect was more obvious when 14m ≤ Lp < 16m compared with other conditions. The peak value of dust concentration within this distance range was the smallest (44.4% lower than the highest peak value, which was verified when Lp = 18m), while the methane concentration was < 0.6%. A high-concentration area (where methane concentration > 0.75%), identified near the walking part of the bolter miner, was 13m shorter than the largest (when Lp = 18m). Therefore, we determined that the optimal blowdown distance would be 14m ≤ Lp < 16m. Within this range, the dust removal and methane dilution effects are optimal, effectively improving the tunnel air quality and providing a safe and clean environment for mine workers.

Variations in subpectoral biceps tenodesis locations do not impact clinical outcomes

Biceps tenodesis is a common treatment for pathologies involving the long head of the biceps brachii. Given variations in surgical approach, focus has been placed on the location of the tenodesis to maintain appropriate length-tension relationship. The purpose of this study is to assess for variations in the tunnel placement in subpectoral biceps tenodesis procedures and correlation of tunnel position with patient-reported outcomes. This is a retrospective case series of outcomes as a function of tunnel location with open subpectoralis biceps tenodesis. The location of the biceps tenodesis tunnel was measured on postoperative Grashey radiographs. Correlation between the tenodesis tunnel and postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was assessed. 31 patients were included in the study with an average follow-up of 17 months. The overall tunnel position from the superior edge of the greater tuberosity ranged from 4.20 cm to 12.61 cm, with an average of 7.46 cm. Final ASES score and VAS were 84.5 and 1.2, respectively. There was only weak correlation between both ASES score and tunnel position (r=-0.12) and VAS and tunnel position (r=-0.23). Subpectoralis biceps tenodesis continues to be a viable treatment option for biceps and superior labral pathology. There remains no consensus on tenodesis location, and this study found no significant difference between tunnel location and patient-reported outcomes. Therefore, it is likely that a range of tenodesis locations exists in which favorable clinical results are achieved, explaining the numerous recommendations on tunnel placement.

Graft impingement increases anterior cruciate ligament graft signal more than acute graft bending angle: magnetic resonance imaging-based study in outside-in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

In this study, the relationship between patient-specific geometric factors and tunnel placement in graft impingement was identified by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal intensity of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) grafts. Ninety-two patients, who were treated between 2014 and 2020, were included retrospectively. These patients underwent primary remnant-preserving outside-in ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and were followed up with postoperative MRI at least one year after surgery. Plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) were used to analyze tibial and femoral tunnel positions. Postoperative MRI was performed, at 32.8 ± 17.5months after surgery, to evaluate the graft signal intensity, the ACL/posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) ratio (APR), ACL/muscle ratio (AMR), tunnel positions, and graft impingement. Clinical and stability outcomes were analyzed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective and objective scores, Lysholm scores, and side-to-side differences (SS-D). The mean APR and AMR of the proximal third of the grafts were significantly lower than those of the middle third of the grafts (p = 0.017 and p = 0.045, respectively). Multivariate regression analysis showed that there was a negative association between the mean APR and AMR of entire intra-articular ACL graft and the distance from the anterior end of the intercondylar roof to the center of the tibial tunnel in the sagittal plane (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively) and the notch width index (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). No significant correlations were found between tunneling and geometric factors, and clinical scores or SS-D. Graft impingement on the anterior tibial tunnel relative to the end of the intercondylar roof and narrow notch was a more significant contributing factor on increased signal intensities of the ACL graft, compared with the acute femoral bending angle in remnant-preserving outside-in ACLR. Therefore, surgeons should focus on intercondylar notch anatomy during tibial tunnel placement to avoid roof impingement. Level III.

Association of Tibial Tubercle–Trochlear Groove Distance With Risk of ACL Graft Failure

Background: Limited evidence suggests a positive correlation between tibial tubercle–trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance and the risk of native anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear. The relationship between TT-TG distance and the risk of ACL graft failure is unknown. Hypothesis: TT-TG distance is independently associated with risk of ACL graft failure. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: All patients who underwent ACL revision surgery between 2010 and 2018 at a single institution were identified. A control cohort underwent primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR) between 2006 and 2015, with no evidence of graft failure at 8.1 ± 2.5 years postoperatively. Record review included anthropometrics, graft type, and estimated Tegner activity score at ≥6 months after primary ACLR. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans after native ACL tear (controls) or graft failure (revision cohort) were assessed for (1) TT-TG distance, (2) proximal tibial slopes, (3) depth of tibial plateau concavity, and (4) tunnel position (revision cohort). Associations between ACL graft failure and MRI measurements, surgical variables, and patient characteristics were evaluated with logistic regression analyses. Sensitivity analyses, excluding patients with tunnel malposition, were performed to confirm multivariable results in patients with “ideal” tunnel placement. Results: Participants included 153 patients who underwent revisions and 144 controls. Controls were older than the patients who underwent revision (26.6 ± 8.8 vs 20.6 ± 7.3 years; P &lt; .001). The mean TT-TG distance and lateral posterior tibial slope (PTS) were smaller for the control group than for the revision group (TT-TG: 9.3 ± 3.9 vs 11.2 ± 4.2 mm; P &lt; .001; lateral PTS: 6.2° ± 3.3° vs 7.2° ± 3.6°; P = .01). TT-TG distance, lateral PTS, and age were associated with risk of ACL graft failure by multivariable analysis (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.07-1.23; P &lt; .001; OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.04-1.22; P = .004; and OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87-0.94; P &lt; .001, respectively). With sensitivity analyses, TT-TG distance, lateral PTS, and age at index surgery remained significantly and independently associated with ACL graft failure. Conclusion: Increased TT-TG distance, increased lateral PTS, and younger age are independently associated with increased odds of ACL graft failure. Patients with these characteristics may require a more comprehensive strategy to reduce the risk of ACL reinjury.

ACL surgery: reasons for failure and management.

Despite the general success of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACL-R), there are still studies reporting a high failure rate. Orthopedic surgeons are therefore increasingly confronted with the treatment of ACL retears, which are often accompanied by other lesions, such as meniscus tears and cartilage damage and which, if overlooked, can lead to poor postoperative clinical outcomes. The literature shows a wide variety of causes for ACL-R failure. Main causes are further trauma and possible technical errors during surgery, among which the position of the femoral tunnel is thought to be one of the most important. A successful postoperative outcome after ACL-revision surgery requires good preoperative planning, including a thorough evaluation of patient's medical history, e.g. instability during daily or sports activity, increased general joint laxity, and hints for a low-grade infection. A careful clinical examination should be performed. Additionally, comprehensive imaging is necessary. Besides a magnetic resonance imaging, a CT scan is helpful to determine location of tunnel apertures and to analyze for tunnel enlargement. A lateral knee radiograph is helpful to determine the tibial slope. The range of surgical options for the treatment of ACL-R failure is broad today. Orthopedic surgeons and experts in Sports Medicine must deal with various possible associated injuries of the knee or unfavorable anatomical conditions for ACL-R. The aim of this review was to highlight predictors and reasons of failures of ACL-R as well as describe diagnostic procedures to individualize treatment strategies for improved outcome after revision ACL-R.

Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failure from rupture, attenuation, or malposition may cause recurrent subjective instability and objective laxity, and occurs in 3% to 22% of ACL reconstruction (ACLr) procedures. Revision ACLr is often indicated to restore knee stability, improve knee function, and facilitate return to cutting and pivoting activities. Prior to reconstruction, a thorough clinical and diagnostic evaluation is required to identify factors that may have predisposed an individual to recurrent ACL injury, appreciate concurrent intra-articular pathology, and select the optimal graft for revision reconstruction. Single-stage revision can be successful, although a staged approach may be used when optimal tunnel placement is not possible due to the position and/or widening of previous tunnels. Revision ACLr often involves concomitant procedures such as meniscal/chondral treatment, lateral extra-articular augmentation, and/or osteotomy. Although revision ACLr reliably restores knee stability and function, clinical outcomes and reoperation rates are worse than for primary ACLr.

Medial placement of trapezoid tunnel leads to higher reduction loss in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with anatomic coracoclavicular fixation.

To analyze the association between clavicular tunnel positioning and postoperative reduction loss in patients with acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation treated with anatomic coracoclavicular (CC) fixation using double clavicular tunnels. A retrospective review of patients with AC joint dislocation, treated with anatomic CC fixation using double clavicular tunnels, was conducted. Patients with pre-operative, immediate post-operative, and final follow-up Zanca-view X-rays were included. On each X-ray, the obtained measures included: distance from lateral border of clavicle to trapezoid and conoid tunnels, distance between tunnels, clavicle length, and CC distance of affected and un-affected sides. Loss of reduction was calculated as CC distance difference between immediate and final post-operative X-rays. Association between reduction loss and tunnel positioning was analyzed. Conoid, trapezoid and tunnel ratios were 24% ± 4, 15% ± 3, and 9% ± 2, respectively. Significant reduction loss was seen in 21(45.7%) patients. Significantly higher probabilities of reduction loss were associated with trapezoid tunnels placed medial to 24 mm (30.8% vs 65.0%, OR 4.2 (IC95%: 1.2-14.4), p: 0.024) or 15% of the clavicle length (32.1% vs 66.7%, OR 4.2 (IC 95%: 1.2-14.9), p: 0.025). Trapezoid tunnels placed medial to 24 mm or 15% medial to clavicle length could lead to higher probabilities of significant reduction loss. These findings support the importance of clavicular tunnels' proper placement for decreasing significant reduction loss.

Geophysical research of underground hydraulic structures, old Glubochinsky water tunnel case study

Research objective is to study the features of geophysical fields and parameters in the area of the artificial underground water tunnel and estimate the capabilities of geophysical methods of identifying hidden underground industrial facilities. Methods of research. Measurements of self-potential signals (SP) were carried out using nonpolarizing electrodes and an electrical exploration receiver. The magnetic exploration was carried out by a proton magnetometer. Electrotomography was carried out using multielectrode electrical survey equipment with a Schlumberger symmetrical scheme of surveys. The microseismic background was recorded using an autonomous seismic station. The georadar survey was carried out using the SIR-3000 ground penetrating radar and antennas with the frequencies of 100 MHz and 270 MHz. Results. Based on the survey results, graphs of magnetic and self-potential fields, electrotomographic and microseismic sections, and radarogram were built on the research profile. The research has shown different levels of the magnetic field and the SP in the area of volcanic rocks and dikes of gabbro-dolerites occurrence. A significant increase in microseismic noise was observed with an increase in the weathering crust thickness. A local decrease in the SP potential, abnormally high values of specific electrical resistivity and intensive reflections of radio waves from the tunnel top were recorded above the underground water tunnel. Conclusions. Qualitative and quantitative geophysical characteristics were obtained in the area of the old underground water tunnel. The research showed different levels of the magnetic field and spontaneous polarization potentials in the occurrence area of rocks of different composition. A significant increase in microseismic noise was recorded with an increase in the weathering crust thickness. Geophysical signs of the boundaries between geological structures and artificial underground objects are revealed. The exact position and depth of the old underground tunnel of Glubochinsky hydraulic structures was determined.

Evaluation of the bone tunnel position and state of healing on second-look arthroscopy after pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear during open-wedge high tibial osteotomy

BackgroundThe aim of the present study was to evaluate the outcome of pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear during open-wedge high tibial osteotomy, including the bone tunnel position and the state of healing on second-look arthroscopy. MethodsThe cohort comprised 22 patients (six men, 16 women) who underwent arthroscopic root fixation by the transtibial pullout technique for medial meniscus posterior root tear during open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. The mean patient age was 63.7 years. The location of the tibial tunnel was assessed using a percentage-dependent method, and the location of a critical point was determined by two coordinates on CT. We defined the distance between the tibial tunnel center and the medial meniscal posterior root anatomic center as the TC-AC distance. The healing state was classified as complete, partial, or failed on second-look arthroscopy. Patients were categorized into those with complete or partial healing (group H) and those with failed healing (group F). The differences in the outcomes and characteristics of groups H and F were evaluated. ResultsTwelve and 10 knees were classified into groups H and F, respectively. The bone tunnel position was significantly more posterior in group H than in group F. The TC-AC distance was significantly shorter in group H than in group F. ConclusionsIn pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear during open-wedge high tibial osteotomy, it was considered important to create a bone tunnel position more posterior to increase the healing rate on second-look arthroscopy.Level of evidence: Level Ⅳ.