Tumor Board Research Articles

Proof-of-concept study of a small language model chatbot for breast cancer decision support – a transparent, source-controlled, explainable and data-secure approach

PurposeLarge language models (LLM) show potential for decision support in breast cancer care. Their use in clinical care is currently prohibited by lack of control over sources used for decision-making, explainability of the decision-making process and health data security issues. Recent development of Small Language Models (SLM) is discussed to address these challenges. This preclinical proof-of-concept study tailors an open-source SLM to the German breast cancer guideline (BC-SLM) to evaluate initial clinical accuracy and technical functionality in a preclinical simulation.MethodsA multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB) is used as the gold-standard to assess the initial clinical accuracy in terms of concordance of the BC-SLM with MTB and comparing it to two publicly available LLM, ChatGPT3.5 and 4. The study includes 20 fictional patient profiles and recommendations for 5 treatment modalities, resulting in 100 binary treatment recommendations (recommended or not recommended). Statistical evaluation includes concordance with MTB in % including Cohen’s Kappa statistic (κ). Technical functionality is assessed qualitatively in terms of local hosting, adherence to the guideline and information retrieval.ResultsThe overall concordance amounts to 86% for BC-SLM (κ = 0.721, p < 0.001), 90% for ChatGPT4 (κ = 0.820, p < 0.001) and 83% for ChatGPT3.5 (κ = 0.661, p < 0.001). Specific concordance for each treatment modality ranges from 65 to 100% for BC-SLM, 85–100% for ChatGPT4, and 55–95% for ChatGPT3.5. The BC-SLM is locally functional, adheres to the standards of the German breast cancer guideline and provides referenced sections for its decision-making.ConclusionThe tailored BC-SLM shows initial clinical accuracy and technical functionality, with concordance to the MTB that is comparable to publicly-available LLMs like ChatGPT4 and 3.5. This serves as a proof-of-concept for adapting a SLM to an oncological disease and its guideline to address prevailing issues with LLM by ensuring decision transparency, explainability, source control, and data security, which represents a necessary step towards clinical validation and safe use of language models in clinical oncology.

Papillary carcinoma arising from de novo ectopic thyroid tissue within thyroglossal duct cyst: A rare case report

The most common congenital anomaly of thyroglossal duct is a thyroglossal duct cyst, but carcinoma arising from a thyroglossal duct cyst is a rare phenomenon. Carcinomas involving thyroglossal duct cysts are mostly papillary carcinomas. Definitive diagnosis of carcinomas involving thyroglossal duct cysts is done through surgical excision and subsequent histopathological examination. Most carcinomas arise de novo from ectopic thyroid tissue within thyroglossal duct cysts, but the direct spread of papillary carcinomas arising from the thyroid gland can also present themselves as carcinomas involving thyroglossal duct cysts in a minority of patients. Clinical presentation in most of the patients with carcinoma of thyroglossal duct cyst is quite similar to that of the patients with histopathologically diagnosed thyroglossal duct cyst, i.e., a painless anterior midline neck swelling with cosmetic concern and no other significant symptom(s). Careful clinical examination, imaging techniques, fine needle aspiration cytology, etc., can be helpful in indicating the presence of carcinoma preoperatively. Management of patients with thyroglossal duct cyst carcinoma involves only the Sistrunk procedure in the majority of cases. However, in a minority of patients, management by Sis trunk procedure with additional total thyroidectomy (with or without dissection of lymph nodes of the neck) and adjuvant chemo and radio-ablation therapies are needed. Here, we report a case of a 17-year-old female with papillary carcinoma involving thyroglossal duct cyst who presented with a submental swelling and was eventually managed by Sis trunk procedure, total thyroidectomy, and adjuvant therapies for optical cure. Decisions for the management of her cancer were taken through multidisciplinary interactions at tumor board meetings and by judging her surgical and therapeutic needs based on her clinical, radiological, and pathological findings.

8581 Unusual Case of Multifactorial Hyperthyroidism

Abstract Disclosure: D.D. Bagar: None. E. Meyers: None. M. Correia: None. Background: Nivolumab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor that is used to treat specific types of cancer, including melanoma, by increasing the ability of the immune system to detect cancer through activating cytotoxic T-cells. The side effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors are mainly through the overactivation of the immune system that can affect many organs with autoimmune diseases, including endocrine glands, which could be severe and irreversible, like hypothyroidism or immune thyroiditis. The uniqueness of this case is the presence of multifactorial causes of hyperthyroidism; in addition, it is one of the few cases of immune checkpoint inhibitor induced positive TSI thyroiditis.Clinical Case: An 82-year-old male with a known history of atrial fibrillation on amiodarone presented to his dermatologist with a left forearm lesion. A shave biopsy showed melanoma, and he underwent wide local excision with negative sentinel lymph node biopsy. However, he had significant melanoma in situ present within 5 mm of the margin and was deemed not a candidate for further excision. Tumor board recommended close surveillance. He then received two cycles of pembrolizumab for one year, followed by nivolumab. During his treatment course, he had CT scans with iodinated contrast every 8-12 weeks for the clinical trial. At his clinic visit, routine thyroid function tests were significant for hyperthyroidism with a TSH &amp;lt;0.01 and free T4 of 6.07 (0.8-1.8). He was asymptomatic except for unintentional weight loss. He denied using any biotin supplements. His labs also showed positive thyroid stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI) of 1.10 (&amp;lt;=0.54 IU/L). A thyroid US with doppler showed two nodules less than 1.1 cm and no increased vascularity. Amiodarone was discontinued, and prednisone and methimazole were started. His free T4 has since normalized and both prednisone and methimazole are being tapered down. Conclusion: This case is a multifactorial cause of hyperthyroidism. He had been using amiodarone for atrial fibrillation, had multiple imaging studies with iodinated contrast, and was on immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy with a positive TSI. The uniqueness of this case is not only that combined factors can affect thyroid function but also that he developed a positive TSI, which indicates either Graves’ disease or immune-induced thyroiditis by nivolumab, which has been reported only in a few cases. Presentation: 6/3/2024

12459 Exceptional Response To A Single Dose Of Pembrolizumab As Salvage Therapy In A Patient With Metastatic Adrenocortical Carcinoma (ACC)

Abstract Disclosure: L. Branchaud-Croisetière: None. J. Castilloux: None. E. Turcotte: None. A. Bégin: None. M. St-Jean: Advisory Board Member; Self; GlaxoSmithKline, HRA Pharmaceuticals. Research Investigator; Self; AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, Spruce Biosciences. Speaker; Self; GlaxoSmithKline, Recordati Rare Diseases. In advanced ACC, limited effective treatment options are available beyond mitotane and cytotoxic chemotherapy. PD-L1 blockade has shown promising results in small numbers of advanced ACC. In ACC, the reported partial response rate to pembrolizumab is around 25%.[1] Only one case of a significant partial response to a single dose of Pembrolizumab as salvage therapy for metastatic ACC was previously published.[1] In April 2023, a 19-year-old woman presented with severe hypertension, hypokalemia and clinical signs of Cushing syndrome (CS). Thoraco-abdominal scan revealed a left-sided cluster of confluent adrenal masses (7.3 x 14.4 x 11.4 cm), a left cortical renal lesion (2.8x2x2.1cm), a right ovarian teratoma (7.9 x 7.8x7.9 cm) and at least 25 pulmonary micronodules. FDG-PET SCAN revealed a significant hypermetabolism of the left adrenal lesions (SUV 18.6), ovarian teratoma (SUV 5.5) and pulmonary micronodules (SUV 1.1-2). Cortisol and androgens secretion was confirmed biochemically. Initially, she was not candidate for a debulking surgery because the tumor was surrounding the aorta, and mesenteric arteries. Hypertension and hypokalemia were treated with spironolactone, amlodipine, amiloride and irbesartan. Cushing syndrome was treated with metyrapone. In April 2023, Etoposide-Doxorubicine-Cisplatin (EDP) was administered in combination with Mitotane (max: 8g/day). After 6 cycles of EDP-M the disease regressed slightly but was considered stable based on RECIST criteria. After 8 cycles, the follow-up imaging showed a progression of the adrenal lesion (9.2x18.2cm) but stable pulmonary micronodules. A biopsy of the adrenal lesion, for therapeutic purpose, revealed microsatellite stability (MSS). The patient refused germinal genetic testing. It was decided in multidisciplinary tumor board to try Pembrolizumab. In December 2023, she received one cycle of Pembrolizumab (140mg), but the treatment was complicated by grade 4 immune-mediated hepatitis. A few weeks following Pembrolizumab she completely normalized her blood pressure and hypokalemia despite cessation of all her anti-hypertensive drugs. Pembrolizumab and Mitotane were stopped and hepatitis completely resolved after two months of Mycophenolate Mofetil and ongoing decreasing dose of prednisone. In March 2024, CT scan showed a 60% regression of the adrenal mass (4.1 x 7.2 cm), stability of the renal lesion and ovarian teratoma and complete resolution of the pulmonary micronodules. We suspect an ongoing effect of immunotherapy and Mitotane, since Mitotane levels were still in the therapeutic range (15.1 mg/L) six weeks following cessation. Mitotane was resumed in March 2024. The patient will potentially have a resection of the left adrenal lesion in the next month. This is second published case of a significant response to Pembrolizumab as second-line therapy for advanced ACC. [1] Raj Net al. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Presentation: 6/1/2024

8581 Unusual Case Of Multifactorial Hyperthyroidism

Abstract Disclosure: D.D. Bagar: None. E. Meyers: None. M. Correia: None. Background: Nivolumab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor that is used to treat specific types of cancer, including melanoma, by increasing the ability of the immune system to detect cancer through activating cytotoxic T-cells. The side effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors are mainly through the overactivation of the immune system that can affect many organs with autoimmune diseases, including endocrine glands, which could be severe and irreversible, like hypothyroidism or immune thyroiditis. The uniqueness of this case is the presence of multifactorial causes of hyperthyroidism; in addition, it is one of the few cases of immune checkpoint inhibitor induced positive TSI thyroiditis.Clinical Case: An 82-year-old male with a known history of atrial fibrillation on amiodarone presented to his dermatologist with a left forearm lesion. A shave biopsy showed melanoma, and he underwent wide local excision with negative sentinel lymph node biopsy. However, he had significant melanoma in situ present within 5 mm of the margin and was deemed not a candidate for further excision. Tumor board recommended close surveillance. He then received two cycles of pembrolizumab for one year, followed by nivolumab. During his treatment course, he had CT scans with iodinated contrast every 8-12 weeks for the clinical trial. At his clinic visit, routine thyroid function tests were significant for hyperthyroidism with a TSH &amp;lt;0.01 and free T4 of 6.07 (0.8-1.8). He was asymptomatic except for unintentional weight loss. He denied using any biotin supplements. His labs also showed positive thyroid stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI) of 1.10 (&amp;lt;=0.54 IU/L). A thyroid US with doppler showed two nodules less than 1.1 cm and no increased vascularity. Amiodarone was discontinued, and prednisone and methimazole were started. His free T4 has since normalized and both prednisone and methimazole are being tapered down. Conclusion: This case is a multifactorial cause of hyperthyroidism. He had been using amiodarone for atrial fibrillation, had multiple imaging studies with iodinated contrast, and was on immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy with a positive TSI. The uniqueness of this case is not only that combined factors can affect thyroid function but also that he developed a positive TSI, which indicates either Graves’ disease or immune-induced thyroiditis by nivolumab, which has been reported only in a few cases. Presentation: 6/3/2024

Assessment of Outcomes by Intention-to-Treat Comparison for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Population-Derived Cohort Study.

The overall treatment response among patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is poorly understood as most studies report solely on resected patients. We aimed to investigate the outcomes in patients with LAPC as an intention-to-treat-analysis from the time of diagnosis from a complete source population. An observational cohort study in a population-defined region within a universal healthcare system. All consecutive patients discussed at multi-disciplinary tumour board (MDT), aged ≥ 18 years and diagnosed with LAPC were included. Exposure was set as recommended treatment by MDT (i.e. upfront surgery, neoadjuvant therapy, palliative treatment or best supportive care). Outcome measures were overall survival analysed by Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and multivariable analyses using logistic regression for odds ratios (OR) and Cox proportional hazard analysis for hazard ratios (HR). In total, 8803 MDT events (6055 unique patients) with pancreatic disease were held during the study period. Some 1436 (24%) had pancreatic cancer, of which 162 (11%) had LAPC and 134 met the population-defined criteria. In overall survival analyses, the patients who were recommended neoadjuvant therapy (± surgery) demonstrated no significant difference to palliative chemotherapy (median 11.0 months vs. 11.8 months; p = 0.226). In multivariable analysis, adjusted OR for overall survival comparing the treatment groups was 0.27 (95% CI 0.02-3.29, p = 0.306) and Cox proportional HR 0.96 (95% CI 0.58-1.59, p = 0.865). In patients with LAPC, survival was not statistically different between those recommended for attempt at neoadjuvant (± surgery) compared with those recommended palliative chemotherapy. The findings suggest that conversion/downstaging chemotherapy is successful in only a select few.

Impact of SARS-CoV-2-Pandemic on diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Introduction The aim of this study was to prove if the SARS-CoV-2-pandemic resulted in a delay in diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer (PC). Methods A monocentric, retrospective analysis was conducted at a university cancer center. Included were all patients with untreated PC diagnosed between January 2019 and December 2021. The observation covered 22 months of the SARS-CoV-2-pandemic and 14 months preceding it. Results 969 men prior (T0) and 1343 during pandemic (T1) where included. Mean age was 68.0 (SD 8.2). Median initial PSA was 8.1 ng/ml (T0) and 7.9 ng/ml (T1, p= 0.288). Time from biopsy to tumor board (T0: 1.3 months vs. T1: 0.9 months, p=0.001), to staging (T0: 1,1 months vs. T1: 0.75 months, p=0.707) and to therapy (T0: 3.0 months vs. T1: 2.0 months, p&lt;0.001) were shortened during pandemic. Classified by d'Amico, a significant shift towards higher risk groups was seen (p=0.024). Local staging showed an insignificant increase in locally advanced PCs. Metastatic diseases decreased from 10.3 % to 8.9% (p=0.433). Pathological staging showed pT3+ in 44.4% vs. 44.7% (p=0.565) and pN+ in 9.9 % vs 9.6% (p=0.899). Conclusion Regarding the diagnosis and treatment of PC, we could not demonstrate any delays due to the SARS-CoV-2-pandemic.

Early integration of palliative care and oncology (EIPCO): A low-maintenance, easy-to-implement program to address palliative care shortages in oncology.

192 Background: With demand for palliative care rising and increasing cancer survival rates, there is an urgent need to train future healthcare professionals in palliative care principles, especially for oncology. Prior work has focused on adding modules or rotations to medical school curriculums. However, this approach provides insufficient or late exposure to specific trainees, such as undergraduate and medical students that are less aware of palliative care. Here, we report on the successful development and implementation of a program that educates early trainees in palliative care and oncology topics while immediately benefiting patients and healthcare teams. Methods: The pilot version of the EIPCO (Early Integration of Palliative Care and Oncology) program was initiated at Stanford in 2021 by a single medical student and faculty advisor. Recruited medical, graduate, and undergraduate student trainees first complete an online, didactic course as a self-paced, safe introduction to palliative care and oncology. A member of EIPCO leadership (officer) then interviews trainees one-on-one to discuss course takeaways, remaining questions, and what follow-up opportunities are most relevant for each trainee. Next, EIPCO facilitates trainee boarding into their respective opportunities, such as shadowing, volunteering, talks, or research projects, to stimulate further learning and excitement. Involved trainees may then also apply to become officers. EIPCO was reliably maintained and expanded by a small team, even when all officers had significant time constraints. Results: EIPCO was received positively by trainees, especially for providing access to rare opportunities where they could directly help patients. Trainees reported the most interest in shadowing (88% of trainees, e.g. inpatient or at tumor boards), providing companionship (96% of trainees, e.g. spiritual care visits or for actively dying patients), and helping patients complete advanced care directives (85% of trainees). These experiences solidified crucial concepts and cultivated interest in palliative care and oncology. Resources have also been developed for the flexible implementation of EIPCO at other institutions. Conclusions: EIPCO serves as a low-maintenance and easy-to-implement model to address a growing need in medical education. EIPCO benefits healthcare teams and patients while exposing early trainees to how palliative and cancer care can be integrated. Further work has begun to expand the program to other institutions to enhance training on a broader scale.

Improving the quality and guideline concordance of multidisciplinary gastric cancer care in a safety net hospital.

314 Background: Gastric cancer is a leading cause of cancer death worldwide and disproportionally affects people of East Asian and Latin American ethnicities. This study aimed to implement and evaluate an intervention to improve the quality and guideline concordance of multidisciplinary gastric cancer care at a public safety net hospital, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital (ZSFG). Methods: A quality improvement (QI) intervention was developed and evaluated by pre-post comparison of clinical data. (1) An in-depth chart review of all patients with gastric adenocarcinoma in 2017-2019 (n=17) evaluated concordance with evidence-based guidelines and quality metrics. (2) Multidisciplinary meetings identified barriers to high quality care and established targets for improvement. (3) A clinical algorithm tailored for ZSFG was disseminated to standardize gastric cancer management. (4) A post-intervention chart review was conducted of all patients from 2021-2022 (n=22). (5) Descriptive statistics and pre-post comparison of QI metrics with Chi square and Kruskal Wallis tests were performed. Results: Pre-intervention clinical data and multidisciplinary input identified gaps in care: variation in provider knowledge and practices, rapidly evolving guidelines, limited access to advanced diagnostic modalities, and non-standardized surgical documentation. After implementation of a standardized approach to address these gaps, pre-post improvement was seen in rates of tumor board presentation (36.3% vs. 85.7%, P= 0.033), use of endoscopic ultrasound (9.09% vs. 64.2%, P= 0.017), pre-treatment nodal staging (27.2% vs. 78.5%, P= 0.030), receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (20% vs. 80%, P=0.007 ), documentation of lymphadenectomy type (25% vs. 100%, P= 0.015), and a trend toward reduced time to PET/CT scan (median, 8.5 weeks pre vs 7.1 weeks post, P= 0.268). Conclusions: A QI intervention was successfully implemented to standardize gastric cancer care at ZSFG. Significant improvements were seen in all targeted metrics except time to outside PET scan. Potential confounders affecting pre-post care quality included personnel changes in a small workforce and the COVID-19 pandemic. Nevertheless, our intervention led to sustained improvements in practice patterns. We aim to replicate this success with other malignancies. Category Pre-Intervention Target Post-Intervention P value* Tumor Board% cM0 cases presented 36% (n=11) &gt;90% 86% (n=14) 0.033 Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)% cM0 cases referred for clinical staging 9% (n=11) &gt;90% 64% (n=14) 0.017 Nodal staging (with EUS or PET) 27% (n=11) N/A 79% (n=14) 0.030 Receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy% eligible patients 20% (n=10) &gt;80% 80% (n=10) 0.007 Surgery documentationLymphadenectomy type (i.e., D1 or D2) 25% (n=8) 100% 100% (n=7) 0.015 Time from diagnosis to PET/CT (median) 8.5 wks &lt;5 wks 7.1 wks 0.268 *Chi square test, Kruskal-Wallis test.

Visual pathology reports for communication of final margin status in laryngeal cancer surgery

BackgroundPositive margins are frequently observed in total laryngectomy (TL) specimens. Effective communication of margin sampling sites and final margin status between surgeons and pathologists is crucial. In this study, we evaluate the utility of multimedia visual pathology reports to facilitate interdisciplinary discussion of margin status in laryngeal cancer surgery. MethodsEx vivo laryngeal cancer surgical specimens were three-dimensional (3D) scanned before standard of care pathological analysis. Using computer-aided design software, the 3D model was annotated to reflect inking, sectioning, and margin sampling sites, generating a visual pathology report. These reports were distributed to head and neck surgeons and pathologists postoperatively. ResultsFifteen laryngeal cancer surgical specimens were 3D scanned and virtually annotated from January 2022 to December 2023. Most specimens (73.3%) were squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). Among the cases, 26.7% had final positive surgical margins, whereas 13.3% had close margins, defined as <5 mm. The visual pathology report demonstrated sites of close or positive margins on the 3D specimens and was used to facilitate postoperative communication between surgeons and pathologists in 85.7% of these cases. Visual pathology reports were presented in multidisciplinary tumor board discussions (20%), email correspondences (13.3%), and teleconferences (6.7%), and were referenced in the final written pathology reports (26.7%). Conclusions3D scanning and virtual annotation of laryngeal cancer specimens for the creation of visual pathology reports is an innovative approach for postoperative pathology documentation, margin analysis, and surgeon–pathologist communication.

Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor Resistance Driven by Emergence of Polyclonal Mutations With Convergent Evolution: A Molecular Tumor Board Discussion.

Polyclonal convergent evolution to PARPi resistance in a patient with metastatic breast cancer with gPALB2.

Utilization of genomic tumor testing (GTT) among community oncologists participating in SWOG S2108CD.

320 Background: As targeted therapy options increase in oncology, GTT use is also increasing; however, the strategies and barriers to ordering GTT can vary across clinics. S2108CD is a cluster randomized trial comparing an educationally enhanced genomic tumor board intervention to usual practice to increase evidence-based genome-informed therapy based on GTT results. This analysis seeks to understand the utilization of GTT by physicians in rural and community oncology clinics. Methods: Physicians at sites enrolled on S2108CD completed baseline questionnaires collecting demographics, practice characteristics, and physicians’ experience with and use of GTT in practice. We also conducted semi-structured interviews at baseline and mid-study with select physicians in both arms to understand how and when physicians are ordering GTT and how it guides treatment decision making. Descriptive statistics were generated for survey data. Interviews were analyzed using conventional content analysis to identify recurring themes. Results: Surveys were completed by 117 physicians across 18 Recruitment Centers, with 57 from the usual practice and 60 from the intervention arm. Interviews were conducted with 10 physicians at baseline and 10 within 12-18 months of start of the study. Physicians reported feeling confident in determining whether GTT is clinically appropriate for a patient (42% moderately confident, 50% very confident). Some physicians utilize GTT from multiple vendors, with the following vendors used most frequently: Tempus (50% of physicians), Caris Life Sciences (61%), Foundation Medicine (62%) and Guardant Health (69%). Over two-thirds of physicians reported that professional guidelines were “very important” in the decision to utilize GTT. Reasons for not ordering GTT included “not relevant for the patient” (36%) and “difficulty in obtaining sufficient tissue” (20%) as “often” reasons. Notably, lack of access and cost/insurance coverage were “never” or “rarely” a reason for not ordering GTT in 80% physicians. Long waits to receive GTT results reportedly caused a delay in making patient care decisions (47% sometimes and 26% often). Physicians rely on the following sources to learn about new GTT panels: scientific meetings (91%), peer-reviewed literature (92%), and professional societies (90%). Interview data confirmed that physicians are generally confident ordering GTT but there is variability in the processes for ordering GTT and receipt of GTT results amongst clinics. Conclusions: Physicians enrolled on S2108CD self-reported high genomic confidence in ordering GTT. Access to GTT and coverage of GTT do not appear to be barriers to utilization. However, physicians did report delays in decision-making due to result turn-around times, which were sometimes attributed to length of time to tissue sendout and receipt of results into health record. Funding : NIH/NCI/NCORP grant UG1CA189974. Clinical trial information: NCT05455606 .

Expert-Guided Large Language Models for Clinical Decision Support in Precision Oncology.

Rapidly expanding medical literature challenges oncologists seeking targeted cancer therapies. General-purpose large language models (LLMs) lack domain-specific knowledge, limiting their clinical utility. This study introduces the LLM system Medical Evidence Retrieval and Data Integration for Tailored Healthcare (MEREDITH), designed to support treatment recommendations in precision oncology. Built on Google's Gemini Pro LLM, MEREDITH uses retrieval-augmented generation and chain of thought. We evaluated MEREDITH on 10 publicly available fictional oncology cases with iterative feedback from a molecular tumor board (MTB) at a major German cancer center. Initially limited to PubMed-indexed literature (draft system), MEREDITH was enhanced to incorporate clinical studies on drug response within the specific tumor type, trial databases, drug approval status, and oncologic guidelines. The MTB provided a benchmark with manually curated treatment recommendations and assessed the clinical relevance of LLM-generated options (qualitative assessment). We measured semantic cosine similarity between LLM suggestions and clinician responses (quantitative assessment). MEREDITH identified a broader range of treatment options (median 4) compared with MTB experts (median 2). These options included therapies on the basis of preclinical data and combination treatments, expanding the treatment possibilities for consideration by the MTB. This broader approach was achieved by incorporating a curated medical data set that contextualized molecular targetability. Mirroring the approach MTB experts use to evaluate MTB cases improved the LLM's ability to generate relevant suggestions. This is supported by high concordance between LLM suggestions and expert recommendations (94.7% for the enhanced system) and a significant increase in semantic similarity from the draft to the enhanced system (from 0.71 to 0.76, P = .01). Expert feedback and domain-specific data augment LLM performance. Future research should investigate responsible LLM integration into real-world clinical workflows.

The impact of ePRO presentation during MDTB on clinician discussion of patient fitness and preferences: The INSPIRE intervention pilot.

251 Background: Treatment of pancreatic cancer often entails multiple modalities (e.g., chemotherapy, surgery, radiation) that vary in intensity, timing, and toxicity. While some options are only recommended for ‘fit’ patients regardless of age, formal fitness measures (such as the geriatric assessment [GA]) and patient preferences are seldom utilized during treatment decision-making. Methods: The INtegrating Systematic PatIent-Reported Evaluations into Multi-Disciplinary Tumor Board (INSPIRE-MDTB) intervention involves the presentation of GA and treatment preferences during MDTB discussions of patients with stage I-IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This qualitative study inductively analyzed, recorded and transcribed historical (November 2021 - February 2022) and intervention (September 2022 - June 2023) MDTBs using NVivo software. A constant comparative method was used to establish a grounded scheme representative of clinicians’ characterization of patients’ fitness and preferences during decision-making. Results: Recordings of the MDTB of 31 historical and 49 intervention patients with similar gender (52%; 53% female), age (m=68.1; 72.3), race (65%; 59% White), and cancer stage (26%; 22% stage IV) were included. The GA was not utilized in any historical case but was presented in 94% of intervention cases. Compared to historical controls, INSPIRE patients had more frequent discussions of (1) Cancer-Related Factors (e.g. size, location, progression speed; 35% vs. 43%), (2) Individual Risk Factors (e.g. age, comorbidities, tolerance; 90% vs 98%), and (3) Psychosocial Factors (e.g. health literacy, social support, substance use; 19% vs 33%) (Table 1). Preference domains were discussed in 39% of historical and 80% of intervention patients, with notable increases in patients’ concerns regarding physical (0%; 35%) and mental/emotional (0%; 20%) side effects, ability to work (0%; 10%), and the logistics and convenience of treatment (6%; 14%). Conclusions: INSPIRE-enhanced MDTB discussion of patient fitness and preferences represents a promising approach to providing a venue for consistent and systematic presentation and discussion of ePROs. Clinicians’ characterization of patients’ fitness during MDTB. Factors Impacting Fitness Baseline Intervention Cancer Related 11 (35%) 21 (43%) High Risk (size, location) 8 (26%) 16 (33%) Rapid Progression 0 (0%) 3 (6%) Prior or Concurrent Cancer 3 (10%) 3 (6%) Individual Risk Factor 28 (90%) 48 (98%) Age 19 (61%) 26 (53%) Comorbidities 24 (77%) 43 (88%) Weight Loss 11 (35%) 5 (10%) Tolerance 7 (23%) 9 (18%) Psychosocial Factor 6 (19%) 16 (33%) Insurance 2 (6%) 0 (0%) Language Barrier 0 (0%) 1 (2%) Health Literacy 0 (0%) 6 (12%) Social Support 3 (10%) 12 (24%) Substance use 1 (3%) 2 (4%)

Chirurgie du cancer à petites cellules

Curative surgery for Small-Cell Lung Cancer (SCLCs) is rare, accounting for less than 5 % of surgeries for bronchopulmonary cancer. The rapid progression of SCLCs and their discovery at a metastatic or locally advanced stage generally exclude them from surgical strategy. Even in localized tumor forms, this surgery is rarely proposed. However, scientific societies (ASCO, ESMO, INCA) have established multimodal management recommendations including radical surgery for selected patients, despite very low levels of evidence. This primarily concerns stage I and sometimes stage II patients, if adjuvant chemotherapy is feasible. Including surgery, the median survival for stage I patients ranges from 28 to 54 months, and 5-year survival rates from 34 % to 65 %, values significantly higher than for non-operated patients. This surgery is not suitable for multi-site or “bulky” N2, but some N2 patients appear to benefit with 5-year survival rates exceeding 20 %. Salvage surgery after tumor re-evolution is possible under certain conditions. Lobectomy with lymph node dissection is the preferred intervention in this context, and the role of sub-lobar resection remains controversial. All these results justify medical combined to surgical discussions in Thoracic Oncology multidisciplinary tumor board for these SCLC patients. Thanks to screening programs and improved staging assessments, the more frequent diagnosis of less extensive forms will certainly highlight the role of surgery for SCLCs. 1877-1203/© 2024 SPLF. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Assessment of pulmonary nodules using [18F]-FDG PET/CT in deep inspiration breath-hold.

Our objective was to compare the diagnostic efficacy of [18F]-FDG PET/CT in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) versus free-breathing corrected by software, in the evaluation of PN. We prospectively analyzed 51 patients to assess PN using [18F]-FDG PET/CT in DIBH and free-breathing corrected by software. A total of 84 nodules with an average size of 10 mm were analyzed, with pathological anatomy or medical treatment decisions by a multidisciplinary tumor board used as reference. A total of 84 PN were evaluated, comparing those in DIBH versus free-breathing, finding statistically significant differences in SUVmax values (p < 0.05) (mean SUVmax 3.7 in free-breathing vs. 5.33 in DIBH). When analyzed by location in lobes, we did not find statistically significant differences, though there was a trend towards higher SUVmax values in the lower lobes. [18F]-FDG PET/CT in DIBH showed high sensitivity (95%) and negative predictive value (NPV) (92%), indicating it may be a promising tool for PN characterization. The acquisition of [18F]-FDG PET/CT in DIBH significantly improves the sensitivity and diagnostic efficacy in the assessment of PN. Although no statistically significant differences were found based on location, there is a potential benefit for the lower lobes. These findings could support its use in clinical practice.

Certification system for multidisciplinary thoracic tumour boards.

In Spain, lung cancer (LC) is the fourth most common cancer. Managing LC involves different professionals, and cooperative and coordinated work is crucial. Therefore, important decisions are better made by Multidisciplinary Thoracic Tumour Boards (MTTBs). On the other hand, certification systems have proven to improve the structure of care, ultimately having a positive impact on patient survival. Herein, a multidisciplinary working group of 11 experts (a Radiologist, a Thoracic Surgeon, a Pulmonologist, a Radiotherapy Oncologist, four Medical Oncologists, a Hospital Managing Director, a Cytologist, and a Molecular Biologist specialist) proposed a standard to certify and evaluate MTTBs. The following components were suggested for the standard: minimum requirements for the MTTB, a mixed model developed in two stages (preparation and audit), a structure comprising three groups of indicators (Strategic and Management, Support, and Operational), three certification levels, and an audit process. In our opinion, certifying MTTBs is critical to improve the standard of care for LC patients.

Skull Base Chordoma in a Young Lady - A Tale of Mismanagement and Redemption: A Case Report and Review of Literature.

Skull base chordomas are a rare entity that requires multidisciplinary decision-making for management. We report a case wherein the patient was initially mismanaged at a peripheral centre, and was then redeemed by a multidisciplinary tumor board decision-making and specialized surgical procedures. We also present a brief review of the therapeutic options.

Increasing access to biomarker-driven treatment for lung cancer in Alabama: The Alabama Access initiative.

159 Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in Alabama, with an estimated 2,550 deaths in 2024. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents 85% of these cases. Despite national guidelines recommending comprehensive biomarker testing (CBT) for metastatic NSCLC, significant disparities persist in the utilization of CBT and targeted therapies among Alabama residents. Methods: In March 2024, we launched the "Alabama Access" initiative – a partnership between the LUNGevity Foundation and the O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Alabama at Birmingham – to foster academic and community oncology partnerships to increase access to biomarker-driven treatments. We used a population health science and geospatial mapping approach to visualize oncology practices serving counties with Alabama's highest lung cancer burden. Practices in Walker, Dothan, Marengo, Morgan, Jackson, Marshall, and Montgomery counties were identified as the highest priority based on annual mortality rates. Key interventions will include virtual molecular tumor boards and oncology navigation to facilitate the integration of resources and expertise and ensure that patients in nonacademic practices benefit from the latest advances in precision oncology. After roll-out, we will collect feasibility and acceptability data around program integration. Results: Our analysis revealed that 62.0% of the state’s population resides in Primary Care Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs), and 58 out of 67 counties are classified as Medically Underserved Areas. The poverty rate in 89.6% of counties surpasses the national average, contributing to higher lung cancer incidence and mortality rates, with 62.0% of cases diagnosed at advanced stages. The state also shows a higher smoking prevalence, affecting 97.0% of counties compared to national figures. We will present practice-level testing data, including barriers to CBT. Conclusions: This pilot aims to mitigate disparities in CBT through enhanced collaboration between academic and community oncology settings. Integrating molecular navigation into community practices will be pivotal in disseminating program information and collecting data on current testing practices to improve overall lung cancer care quality in Alabama.

Outcomes of multidisciplinary management of pulmonary nodules in a tertiary center

Objective: A multidisciplinary approach is recommended for managing pulmonary nodules. This study aimed to examine the malignancy rates, malignancy determinants, and follow-up results of patients with pulmonary nodules whom the multidisciplinary team evaluates. Methods: Clinical characteristics of the patients, radiological and histological characteristics of the nodules, and the follow-up outcomes were documented retrospectively. A total of 94 patients with solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) (n=58) and multiple pulmonary nodules (MPNs) (n=36) were included in the study. Results: Our study showed that malignancy risk increased with irregular nodule margins (p &lt; 0.008). Patients who had tissue sampling from suspected nodules exhibited markedly higher rates of previous malignancy than those who did not (58.5% vs. 19.5% p&lt;0.001). For the patients with solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN), the group for whom biopsy was planned had more underlying malignancy (p=0.011) and had a bigger nodule size of 10 mm (range, 8.0-13.25 mm) vs 15.00 mm (range, 10.0-19.75 mm) (p=0.003). Among the patients who have multiple pulmonary nodules (MPN), eighty-four percent of patients in the biopsy group had underlying malignancy diagnoses, whereas this rate was 26% in the CT follow-up group (p=0.002). Adenocarcinoma was the most common SPN histology and squamous cell carcinoma for MPNs. The Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Board identified malignancy in 60% of patients with SPNs and 92.3% of those with MPNs/ Conclusions: Patients evaluated in the multidisciplinary tumor board consist of a very diverse patient group. Discerning between malignant and benign conditions relies heavily on examining nodule features and assessing malignancy history.