Tumorigenicity Of Prostate Cancer Cells Research Articles

The Cytoplasmic Domain of C-CAM1 Tumor Suppressor Is Necessary and Sufficient for Suppressing the Tumorigenicity of Prostate Cancer Cells

We have previously shown that C-CAM1 cell adhesion molecule can suppress the growth of prostate cancer cells in vivo. In this study, we determined the minimal domain of C-CAM1 that is required for its tumor-suppressive activity. DU145 prostate cancer cells were infected with recombinant adenoviruses containing various C-CAM1 mutant genes, and the effects of the mutant C-CAM1 proteins on the growth of DU145 cells were assessed in a nude-mice xenograft model. Deletion of C-CAM1's cytoplasmic domain, which is not required for its adhesion activity, abolished the growth-suppressive activity, whereas deletion of the adhesion domain did not. This observation suggests that C-CAM1's extracellular domain may be not essential for its tumor suppressive activity. Indeed, we found that expression of the C-CAM1 cytoplasmic domain alone led to growth suppression of DU145 cells. These results suggest that the cytoplasmic domain of C-CAM1 is necessary and sufficient for its growth-suppressive function.

Distinct CXC Chemokines Mediate Tumorigenicity of Prostate Cancer Cells

Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of malignancy-related mortality in males in the United States. As a solid tumor, clinically significant tumor growth and metastasis are dependent on nutrients and oxygen supplied by tumor-associated neovasculature. As such, there is a selective tumorigenic advantage for those neoplasms that can produce angiogenic mediators. We show here that human prostate cancer cell lines can constitutively produce angiogenic CXC chemokines. Tumorigenesis of PC-3 prostate cancer cells was shown to be attributable, in part, to the production of the angiogenic CXC chemokine, interleukin (IL)-8. Neutralizing antisera to IL-8 inhibits PC-3 tumor growth in a human prostate cancer/SCID mouse model. Furthermore, angiogenic activity in PC-3 tumor homogenates was attributable to IL-8. In contrast, the Du145 prostate cancer cell line uses a different angiogenic CXC chemokine, GRO-alpha, to mediate tumorigenicity. Neutralizing antisera to GRO-alpha but not IL-8 reduced tumor growth in vivo and reduced the angiogenic activity in tumor homogenates. Thus, prostate cancer cell lines can use distinct CXC chemokines to mediate their tumorigenicity.

Manipulation of T cell costimulatory and inhibitory signals for immunotherapy of prostate cancer.

The identification of potentially useful immune-based treatments for prostate cancer has been severely constrained by the scarcity of relevant animal research models for this disease. Moreover, some of the most critical mechanisms involved in complete and proper antitumoral T cell activation have only recently been identified for experimental manipulation, namely, components involved in the costimulatory pathway for T cell activation. Thus, we have established a novel syngeneic murine prostate cancer model that permits us to examine two distinct manipulations intended to elicit an antiprostate cancer response through enhanced T cell costimulation: (i) provision of direct costimulation by prostate cancer cells transduced to express the B7.1 ligand and (ii) in vivo antibody-mediated blockade of the T cell CTLA-4, which prevents T cell down-regulation. In the present study we found that a tumorigenic prostate cancer cell line, TRAMPC1 (pTC1), derived from transgenic mice, is rejected by syngeneic C57BL/6 mice, but not athymic mice, after this cell line is transduced to express the costimulatory ligand B7.1. Also, we demonstrated that in vivo antibody-mediated blockade of CTLA-4 enhances antiprostate cancer immune responses. The response raised by anti-CTLA-4 administration ranges from marked reductions in wild-type pTC1 growth to complete rejection of these cells. Collectively, these experiments suggest that appropriate manipulation of T cell costimulatory and inhibitory signals may provide a fundamental and highly adaptable basis for prostate cancer immunotherapy. Additionally, the syngeneic murine model that we introduce provides a comprehensive system for further testing of immune-based treatments for prostate cancer.