Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Therapy Research Articles

Precision Dosing of Intravenous Tocilizumab: Development of Pharmacokinetic Model-Derived Tapering Strategies for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Tocilizumab targets the interleukin-6 receptor, and dosing is complex owing to its nonlinear clearance related to target binding. Therefore, tapering tocilizumab requires a different approach than that of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). This study aimed to identify these differences and enable personalized treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) beyond TNFi therapy. A population pharmacokinetic model of intravenous tocilizumab was developed using data from a randomized controlled trial of dose tapering in patients with RA. Subsequent population-level Monte Carlo and individual Bayesian simulations were performed to create tapering strategies involving dose reduction and interval extension. The target trough concentration of tocilizumab was 5 mg/L. Finally, the drug savings were compared between the 2 methods. The pharmacokinetic of tocilizumab was described with a 2-compartment model with parallel linear (CL 0.20 L/d) and nonlinear (VM 5.2 mg/d, KM 0.19 mg/L) elimination. The linear clearance rate and central volume of distribution increased with lean body mass, and men exhibited higher clearance rates than women. The simulated concentration-time profiles demonstrated that, owing to nonlinear clearance, drug concentrations decreased more than dose-proportionally with lower doses. Tapering based on an individual Bayesian approach emerged as the most promising strategy, yielding a 39% reduction in drug use across virtual populations. Tapering strategies were developed for intravenous tocilizumab, offering potential application in patients with RA who have reached low disease activity or remission, pending clinical validation. The developed strategies demonstrate that the tapering of tocilizumab should be approached more carefully and in smaller steps than that of TNFi.

TNF inhibitors target a mevalonate metabolite/TRPM2/calcium signaling axis in neutrophils to dampen vasculitis in Behçet’s disease

TNF inhibitors have been used to treat autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases. Here we report an unexpected mechanism underlying the therapeutic effects of TNF inhibitors in Behçet’s disease (BD), an autoimmune inflammatory disorder. Using serum metabolomics and peripheral immunocyte transcriptomics, we find that polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) from patients with BD (BD-PMN) has dysregulated mevalonate pathway and subsequently increased farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP) levels. Mechanistically, FPP induces TRPM2-calcium signaling for neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) and proinflammatory cytokine productions, leading to vascular endothelial inflammation and damage. TNF, but not IL-1β, IL-6, IL-18, or IFN-γ, upregulates TRPM2 expression on BD-PMN, while TNF inhibitors have opposite effects. Results from mice with PMN-specific FPP synthetase or TRPM2 deficiency show reduced experimental vasculitis. Meanwhile, analyses of public datasets correlate increased TRPM2 expressions with the clinical benefits of TNF inhibitors. Our results thus implicate FPP-TRPM2-TNF/NETs feedback loops for inflammation aggravation, and novel insights for TNF inhibitor therapies on BD.

Factors Associated with the Development of Anti-drug Antibodies to TNFi and the Consequences for Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Two-year Follow-up Study.

To evaluate the development of anti-drug antibodies (ADAb) against tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) therapy during a 2-year period and search the factors linked to patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Biologic-naive patients with axSpA were included in this observational study. Serum drug levels and ADAb were measured at weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 of treatment by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The development of ADAb and factors related to ADAb over time were investigated using generalized estimating equations (GEE). A total of 180 patients with axSpA (116 male, mean (±SD) 45.6 (±11.9) years) who started TNFi treatment (etanercept (32.2%), adalimumab (27.2%), golimumab (20.6%), infliximab (20%)) were included. In the etanercept treatment group, only 1 patient had ADAb at 12 weeks and 24 weeks. Anti-drug antibodies against TNFi drugs were present in the adalimumab group in 32.7% of patients and in the infliximab group in 21.2% of patients at 12 weeks, and the proportion of ADAb-positive patients were found to be stable throughout the follow-up for adalimumab- and infliximab-treated patients. In the golimumab group, one patient had ADAb against golimumab at 12 weeks and the proportion of ADAb-positive patients increased throughout follow-up. In longitudinal analysis, baseline age, TNFi type, longitudinal Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and ASDAS-CRP scores, serum C-eeactive protein (CRP) levels, presence of adverse events and treatment discontinuation were associated with the presence of ADAb. The development of ADAb against TNFi therapy is associated with younger age, high disease activity, the development of adverse events and more common treatment discontinuation in patients with axSpA during 2-year follow-up.

Clinical Characteristics and Management of Drug-Induced Lupus in Patients Receiving Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Therapy

Clinical Characteristics and Management of Drug-Induced Lupus in Patients Receiving Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Therapy

Risk of Inflammatory Central Nervous System Diseases After Tumor Necrosis Factor–Inhibitor Treatment for Autoimmune Diseases

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors have been used extensively to treat various autoimmune diseases. However, there are ongoing debates about the risk of inflammatory central nervous system (CNS) disease events following TNF inhibitor therapy, as well as uncertainty about how this risk varies across different autoimmune diseases or TNF-blocking agents. To evaluate the risk of inflammatory CNS diseases after anti-TNF initiation and assess the difference in risk among different types of underlying autoimmune diseases or TNF inhibitors. Separate searches were conducted across PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception until March 1, 2024. Observational studies assessing the association between anti-TNF therapy and inflammatory CNS diseases relative to a comparator group. Study eligibility assessment and data extraction were independently conducted by 2 investigators following PRISMA guidelines. The risk ratio (RR) was used as the effect measure of the pooled analysis. The primary outcome was the risk of incident inflammatory CNS events after anti-TNF therapy for autoimmune diseases. Secondary analyses were performed based on different types of underlying autoimmune diseases and TNF inhibitors. Eighteen studies involving 1 118 428 patients with autoimmune diseases contributing more than 5 698 532 person-years of follow-up were analyzed. The incidence rates of new-onset inflammatory CNS events after initiating TNF inhibitors ranged from 2.0 to 13.4 per 10 000 person-years. Overall, exposure to TNF inhibitors was associated with a 36% increased risk of any inflammatory CNS disease compared to conventional therapies (RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.01-1.84; I2, 49%), mainly attributed to demyelinating diseases (RR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.04-1.81; I2, 31%). Secondary analyses revealed a similar risk of inflammatory CNS diseases across different types of underlying autoimmune diseases (rheumatic diseases: RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.84-2.21; inflammatory bowel disease 1.49; 95% CI, 0.93-2.40; P for subgroup = .74) and TNF inhibitors (anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies vs etanercept: RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.93-1.15; I2, 0%). Compared to conventional therapies, exposure to TNF inhibitors was associated with a 36% increased risk of inflammatory CNS diseases, irrespective of background autoimmune disease or TNF inhibitor type.

Implementation study of the CARRA Uveitis Consensus Treatment Plans: feasibility for clinical practice and applicability for research

BackgroundChronic anterior uveitis (CAU) carries a significant risk for eye complications and vision loss. The Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) introduced consensus treatment plans (CTPs) to standardize treatment for CAU and facilitate future comparative effectiveness studies. Two CTPs were developed to address: 1) initiation of methotrexate (MTX) in patients with CAU naïve to steroid-sparing therapy, and 2) initiation of a TNF inhibitor (TNFi) in patients with severe uveitis or uveitis refractory to MTX. We evaluated implementation of the uveitis CTPs using existing CARRA Registry infrastructure and assessed feasibility of the CTPs for comparative effectiveness research.MethodsThis prospective observational cohort study was conducted at nine pilot sites between February 2020 and August 2022. Patients with JIA-associated CAU (JIA-U) were treated according to either the MTX or TNFi CTP. Uveitis activity and medication use were recorded at 0, 3, and 6 months. We assessed patient enrollment rates, CTP arm selection, uveitis control, and quality of data collection. We also evaluated CTP arm selection in a retrospective cohort of similar JIA-U patients enrolled in the CARRA Registry during the same study period.ResultsSeventeen patients were included in the pilot cohort. Eight were treated with the MTX CTP (4 oral MTX, 4 subcutaneous MTX), and 9 with the TNFi CTP (9 received standard-dose adalimumab, none selected high-dose adalimumab or infliximab). Uveitis was controlled in 13 of 17 patients by 6 months. Query of the CARRA-wide Registry identified 42 patients with JIA-U who were treated according to the MTX or TNFi CTPs. Among these, 26 were treated with MTX (8 oral, 18 subcutaneous) and 16 with TNFi (12 standard dose adalimumab, 2 high dose adalimumab, and 2 infliximab).ConclusionBoth the MTX and TNFi uveitis CTPs can practically be implemented in clinical settings and are currently being utilized across Registry sites. However, in patients starting TNFi therapy, all pilot study participants and most patients across the CARRA Registry were treated with a standard dose of adalimumab. This consensus on the treatment approach underscores its broad acceptance but also limits the applicability of the uveitis TNFi CTP for comparative effectiveness research.

Assessing safety and efficacy of TNFi treatment in late onset ankylosing spondylitis: a TURKBIO registry study

Clinical data on the use of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in late-onset ankylosing spondylitis (LoAS) are limited. The present study aimed to evaluate efficacy, safety, and treatment adherence associated with the initial use of TNFi therapy in biologic naive patients diagnosed with LoAS. Patients whose age of onset was ≥ 45 years and < 45 years were classified as having LoAS and YoAS, respectively, based on the age of symptom onset. There were 2573 patients with YoAS and 281 LoAS. Baseline disease activity measures were similar between the groups. No significant differences were seen between the two groups in response to treatment and in remaining on the first TNFi at 6, 12 and 24 months. In the LoAS group, the analysis showed that TNFi discontinuation was linked to VAS pain score (HR 1.04; 95% CI 1.01–1.06). Patient groups had similar rates of adverse events (YoAS: 8.7% vs. LoAS: 11.7%). In both biologic naive LoAS and YoAS patients, the study showed that the initial TNFi therapy was equally effective and safe.

Prescription of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for patients with inflammatory arthritis decreases with the initiation of tumour necrosis factor inhibitor therapy: results from the ICEBIO registry

Objective To study the impact of tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitor (TNFi) therapy on the use of non-steroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in Iceland. Method This registry cohort study used data from the nationwide database on biologics in Iceland (ICEBIO) and the Icelandic Prescription Medicines Register on disease activity, and filled prescriptions for NSAIDs, to study the period from 2 years before to 2 years after initiation of a first TNFi. Five randomly selected individuals from the general population matched on age, sex, and calendar time for each patient served as comparators. Results Data from 940 patients and 4700 comparators were included. Patients with arthritis were prescribed 6.7 times more defined daily doses of NSAIDs than comparators (149 vs 22 per year). After TNFi initiation, NSAID use decreased to a mean of 85 DDD per year, or by 42% in RA, 43% in PsA, and 48% in axSpA. At TNFi initiation, the quintile of axSpA patients who used most NSAIDs reported significantly worse pain (mean ± sd 66 ± 21 vs 60 ± 23 mm), global health (70 ± 20 vs 64 ± 23 mm), and Health Assessment Questionnaire score (1.21 ± 0.66 vs 1.02 ± 0.66) than the other patients, whereas no significant differences were observed in the groups with peripheral arthritis. Conclusion Patients with inflammatory arthritides requiring TNFi therapy use more NSAIDs than matched comparators, and consumption decreased following TNF initiation. Patient-reported measures are not associated with high NSAID use in patients with peripheral arthritis.

Ex-vivo Cell-based Assay for Assessment of Response to TNF Inhibitors in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases.

TNF inhibitors (TNFi) comprise 5 products whose structure and signalling differ. An individual patient with a rheumatic disease may respond to one TNFi but not to another. In addition, 30-40% of the patients respond inadequately to TNFi. The different TNFi downstream signalling may lead to their clinical efficacy. Several reports showed that TNFi exhibited differential effects on Th17 cells. We analyzed the different TNFi effects on IL-17A expression in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of patients with rheumatic diseases in order to evaluate the predictive capability of responses in an ex-vivo setting. PBMCs were co-cultured with the different TNFi or medium (control), and IL-17A mRNA levels were analyzed by qPCR. IL-17A expression levels in response to 4 TNFi (except certolizumab pegol) were compared with control. IL-17A expression in the assay was correlated to the clinical responses. Assay sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing responders from non-responders was calculated by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The results of a retrospective cohort of patients with rheumatic diseases (n = 82) correlated with their therapeutic responses to the different TNFi with 89.5% accuracy. The assay predicted the responses of a prospective cohort (n = 54) to specific TNFi with 79% accuracy. This functional assay could assist in predicting the odds for response to TNFi therapy, indicating whether a given patient is likely to respond to a specific TNFi.

Gut microbiome and metabolome to discover pathogenic bacteria and probiotics in ankylosing spondylitis.

Previous research has partially revealed distinct gut microbiota in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). In this study, we performed non-targeted fecal metabolomics in AS in order to discover the microbiome-metabolome interface in AS. Based on prospective cohort studies, we further explored the impact of the tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) on the gut microbiota and metabolites in AS. To further understand the gut microbiota and metabolites in AS, along with the influence of TNFi, we initiated a prospective cohort study. Fecal samples were collected from 29 patients with AS before and after TNFi therapy and 31 healthy controls. Metagenomic and metabolomic experiments were performed on the fecal samples; moreover, validation experiments were conducted based on the association between the microbiota and metabolites. A total of 7,703 species were annotated using the metagenomic sequencing system and by profiling the microbial community taxonomic composition, while 50,046 metabolites were identified using metabolite profiling. Differential microbials and metabolites were discovered between patients with AS and healthy controls. Moreover, TNFi was confirmed to partially restore the gut microbiota and the metabolites. Multi-omics analysis of the microbiota and metabolites was performed to determine the associations between the differential microbes and metabolites, identifying compounds such as oxypurinol and biotin, which were correlated with the inhibition of the pathogenic bacteria Ruminococcus gnavus and the promotion of the probiotic bacteria Bacteroides uniformis. Through experimental studies, the relationship between microbes and metabolites was further confirmed, and the impact of these two types of microbes on the enterocytes and the inflammatory cytokine interleukin-18 (IL-18) was explored. In summary, multi-omics exploration elucidated the impact of TNFi on the gut microbiota and metabolites and proposed a novel therapeutic perspective: supplementation of compounds to inhibit potential pathogenic bacteria and to promote potential probiotics, therefore controlling inflammation in AS.

Characteristics associated with patient-reported treatment success in psoriatic arthritis.

To determine characteristics associated with patient-reported treatment success in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Rheumatologist-diagnosed PsA patients fulfilling the CASPAR classification were recruited from a single center. PsA outcome measures included: 66/68 swollen/tender joint counts, Leeds/SPARCC dactylitis/enthesitis indices, psoriasis body surface area (BSA), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) including PROMIS. The primary outcome was a patient-reported item: "Today, considering the level of control of your psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis, do you consider your treatment has been successful?" Descriptive and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified clinical predictors of patient-reported treatment success. Patient-reported reasons for lack of treatment success were explored. A total of 178 participants had a baseline visit. Mean (SD) CASPAR score was 3.7 (0.9), age 51.7 (13.5) years, and BMI 31.3 (7.2) kg/m2. Fifty-two percent were women, and 86.0% white. Treatment success was reported by 116/178(65%) patients in the analytic cohort. Among 76 patients who reported treatment failure, the most frequently selected reasons for lack of success were pain (n = 55, 72.4%), fatigue (n = 46, 60.5%), inflamed joints (n = 40, 52.6%), and stiffness (n = 40, 52.6%). Overall, 105 participants had complete data across variables in the logistic regression models. Patient-reported treatment success was independently associated with the 66-swollen/68-tender joint counts, psoriasis BSA, PROs (pain interference, physical function, fatigue), and TNF-inhibitor therapy, after controlling for BMI and demographics. Patient-reported treatment success in PsA may be achieved through improvement of inflammatory arthritis, psoriasis, pain, physical function, fatigue, and the use ofTNF-inhibitors. Patients reported treatment failure was most commonly due to symptoms of pain, fatigue and stiffness.

Comparison of Incidence or Recurrence of Anterior Uveitis in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis Treated with Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors

Background: Anterior uveitis (AU) is a significant concern in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and the choice of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) as a treatment modality raises questions regarding its effects on AU. We compared the effects of TNFi on AU in patients with AS. Methods: Patients diagnosed with AS and treated with at least one TNFi, including anti-TNFα antibodies (adalimumab and infliximab) or a soluble TNF receptor molecule (etanercept), between January 2010 and December 2022, were retrospectively reviewed. We compared the recurrence rate of AU in patients with a history of uveitis and the incidence of new-onset AU in those without a history of uveitis among the three TNFi groups. We also compared the effects of two different TNFi agents in patients who underwent TNFi switching. Results: Within two years of treatment initiation, there was no significant difference in AU recurrence among the three TNFi groups. However, the incidence of new-onset AU was significantly higher in the etanercept group than in the adalimumab group (26.4% vs. 6.3%; p = 0.024). After two years, the AU recurrence rate was significantly lower in the adalimumab group than in the other groups (p &lt; 0.001). Among patients who underwent anti-TNFi switching, adalimumab treatment was associated with a significantly lower incidence of uveitis than etanercept (p = 0.023). Conclusion: In the short-term period following TNFi therapy, etanercept induced new-onset AU more frequently than adalimumab in patients with AS. Adalimumab recipients experienced fewer AU recurrences during the subsequent long-term period compared to other TNFi recipients.

P1056 T cell responses to repeated SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and breakthrough infections in patients with inflammatory bowel disease on TNF inhibitor treatment, a prospective cohort study

Abstract Background Understanding T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 immunisation in patients on immunosuppressive treatment is important for future vaccine recommendations. Our aim was to investigate the magnitude and quality of T cell responses following repeated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses and COVID-19 (breakthrough infections). Methods In this prospective, observational study of responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines (Nor-vaC)1, patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on TNF inhibitor (TNFi) therapy receiving up to four SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses, and healthy controls receiving three vaccine doses were included. CD4 and CD8 T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 peptides were measured by flow cytometry before and 2-4 weeks following vaccination and breakthrough infection. Antibodies to the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the Wuhan-Hu-1 and BA.1 (omicron) strains were measured. Results Between March 2, 2021, and December 20, 2022, 118 IBD patients, and 21 healthy controls were included in the study (Table). Following three vaccine doses, the humoral immune response was attenuated in IBD patients compared to healthy controls (median 3954 BAU/ml vs. 6280 BAU/ml, p=0.008). However, both the percentage of spike-specific T cells (CD4 median 0.11% vs. 0.10%, p=0.259, CD8 0.030% vs. 0.046%, p=0,333) and T cell polyfunctionality scores (a measure of quality of vaccine response) (CD4 median 0.403 vs. 0.371, p=0.386, CD8 0.105 vs. 0.101, p=0.871), showed comparable quality in IBD patients and controls following three doses. CD4 T cell responses increased rapidly and plateaued after two vaccine doses whereas CD8 T cell responses continued to improve up to four vaccine doses (Figure). Breakthrough infection in patients following the third or fourth vaccine dose increased CD8 polyfunctionality and generated broad CD4 and CD8 T cell responses against non-spike peptides. There was no difference in T cell responses between patients using TNFi mono- and combo therapy after primary vaccination (three vaccine doses) (p=0.648). Conclusion Despite attenuated antibody responses, IBD patients on TNFi treatment demonstrated T cell responses comparable to healthy controls following three SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses. Repeated vaccination and breakthrough infection increased the quality and breadth of T cell responses, reaching a plateau. Distinguishing between CD4 and CD8 immune compartments and dynamics of activation after SARS-CoV-2 immunisation may provide nuanced understanding of protective cellular responses The study results indicate that IBD patients on TNFi treatment may in future follow the same recommendations for further SARS-CoV-2 vaccines as the general population. 1Clinialtrials.gov NCT04798625

P877 A comparison of vedolizumab and ustekinumab treatment in patients with Ulcerative Colitis after failure of treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitor

Abstract Background Data comparing vedolizumab (VDZ) and ustekinumab (UST) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) previously treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) and followed with regular serum-drug measurements are scarce. In the national pharmaceutical tender system of Norway, VDZ was listed as the first drug of choice after failed TNFi treatment from 2016 to 2019 and UST from 2020 to 2022. We aimed to compare drug persistence, effectiveness, drug dosing and disease activity in patients treated with VDZ or UST after failed TNFi therapy. Methods We included patients who had failed at least one TNFi and started either VDZ treatment (years 2016-2019) or UST (years 2020-2022). Patients were followed for one year after initiating the treatment or until discontinuation. Prospectively recorded data were obtained from the electronic patient journal (EPJ) and the local IBD-registry. Clinical remission was defined as 6-point Mayo Score ≤1, and biochemical remission was defined as CRP&amp;lt;5 mg/L and FC&amp;lt;250 µg/g. Patients were followed with regular serum-drug measurements and dose adjustments were made at the discretion of the treating physician based on serum-drug measurements and clinical activity at follow-up visits. Wilcoxon signed rank and Mann Whitney U test were used to assess differences in paired and unpaired data, respectively. Results A total of 116 patients were included, 59 treated with VDZ and 57 with UST. At 52 weeks, there was no difference in estimated drug persistence with 85% [73-92] for VDZ and 92% [80-96] for UST. Clinical remission increased significantly in both groups (Table 1), and no difference was found between UST and VDZ for clinical remission at week 0 and 52 (OR=2.1 [0.9-4.5] and OR=0.9 [0.3-2.3]). Contrary to the VDZ group, there was a significant decrease in CRP from week 0 to 52 in the UST group, while FC decreased significantly in both groups (Table 1). The proportion of patients in biochemical remission increased in the UST group while there was no significant change in the VDZ group. Significantly more patients treated with UST received an intensified treatment regime at 52 weeks (interval less than eight weeks) compared to VDZ treated patients (87% (95% CI [74-94]) vs 59% (95% CI [45-72])). Conclusion This study demonstrates that one-year drug persistence and clinical remission were high and comparable in both UST and VDZ treated UC patients with previous TNFi failure. Treatment with UST, but not VDZ, was associated with a significant increase in the proportion of patients in biochemical remission from induction to 52 weeks. However, a significantly larger proportion of patients treated with UST received intensified dosing at 52 weeks compared with VDZ treated patients.

DOP15 Results of a pragmatic multicentred randomised controlled trial investigating the use of personalised golimumab dosing in Ulcerative Colitis: the GOAL-ARC study (GLM dose Optimisation to Adequate Levels to Achieve Response in Colitis)

Abstract Background Ulcerative Colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often leading to impaired quality of life in affected patients. Current treatment modalities include anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) monoclonal antibodies including infliximab, adalimumab and golimumab (GLM). RCT show higher trough drug levels (DL) following induction are associated with enhanced rates of remission in maintenance. GOAL-ARC is a pragmatic RCT to examine if dose optimisation of GLM following induction in response to suboptimal DL or persistently raised faecal calprotectin (FCP) improves rates of patient continuous clinical response (pCCR) and reduces maintenance disease activity in UC Methods A pragmatic randomised, multi-centre two-arm investigator initiated trial (NCT0268772) . Population – Patients with moderate to severe UC requiring TNF inhibitor therapy. Intervention - one arm receiving GLM treatment as per SMPC and one arm with dose optimisation of GLM based on FCP and DL from week 6 according to a dedicated algorithm. Eligible patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to 1 of 2 treatment groups. Study Duration - 46 weeks. Primary end-point pCCR = absence of flare defined as no increase in modified partial Mayo (MPM) score of 2 points from week 14-46 (requiring treatment intervention). Secondary endpoints included rate of clinical response to induction (week 14), defined as a drop of MPM of 2 points or decrease of ≥30% from baseline and level of FCP and rate of mucosal healing (Mayo endoscopic subscore of 0/1) at Wk 46 Results 107 patients were enrolled (target enrolment n=135, study enrolment terminated early due to recruitment problems during and following C19 pandemic). 97 patients (median age 42) were randomised, with one patient subsequently excluded due to ineligibility. Of 96 evaluable patients, 46 were randomised to SMPC treatment and 50 were randomised to the intervention. Baseline characteristic were comparable. 28/46 (61%) achieved wk 14 clinical response with SMPC and 19/46 (41%) met the primary endpoint (pCCR wk 14-46). In the intervention arm 28/50 (56%) achieved wk 14 clinical response and 24/50 (48%) met the primary endpoint (pCCR wk 14-46). The difference between groups in the rates of pCCR was 6.7% (95% CI:-0.15,0.29) in favour of the intervention and was not statistically significant. No safety signal associated with the intervention was observed. Conclusion In a pragmatic RCT no significant increase in the rate of pCCR was observed with personalised dosing of GLM for treatment of moderate to severe UC. A numerical trend towards reduced loss of response during maintenance (20% with SMPC versus 8% with intervention) is observed with personalised dosing of GLM suggesting this strategy may be beneficial in some patients

Real-World Treatment and Care Patterns in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Initiating First-Line Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Therapy in the United States.

Treatment guidelines for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) recommend targeting low disease activity or remission and switching therapies for patients not reaching those targets. We evaluated real-world use of disease activity measures, treatment discontinuation, and switching patterns among patients with RA initiating a first-line tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi). Data from adult patients with RA initiating a first-line TNFi were collected from the American Rheumatology Network (January 2014-August 2021). The proportion of patients with recorded disease activity scores (Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI] or Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 [RAPID3]) at TNFi initiation was assessed. Among patients with moderate or severe RA at TNFi initiation, reasons for discontinuation and subsequent advanced therapy were evaluated. Among TNFi initiators (n=15,182), 44.8% recorded a CDAI/RAPID3 score at treatment initiation; of those who did not, 47.0% had recorded a tender and/or swollen joint count or pain score. Among patients with moderate or severe RA (n=1,651), 52% discontinued their initial TNFi during follow-up, of which 15%, 46%, 28%, and 12% initiated the same TNFi, another TNFi, a non-TNFi biologic, or a Janus kinase inhibitor, respectively. The proportion of patients restarting the same TNFi or initiating another TNFi varied according to TNFi discontinuation reason. In clinical practice, over half of patients with RA initiating a first-line TNFi did not have baseline disease activity assessments. Many patients cycled through TNFi despite citing lack of efficacy as the most common reason for discontinuation. Consistent, objective monitoring of treatment response and timely switch to effective therapy is needed in patients with RA.

Lower body mass and lower adiposity are associated with differential responses to two treatment strategies for rheumatoid arthritis

PurposeTo determine if body mass index (BMI) and adipokine levels identify rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients most likely to benefit from initiation of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) after methotrexate inadequate...

Risk of New-Onset Inflammatory Central Nervous System Diseases After Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors Treatment for Autoimmune Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors have been extensively utilized to treat various autoimmune diseases. However, there are ongoing debates about the risk of inflammatory central nervous system (CNS) diseases events following TNF inhibitors therapy, as well as uncertainty about how this risk varies across different autoimmune diseases or TNF blocking agents. We aimed to evaluate the risk of inflammatory CNS diseases after anti-TNF initiation and assess the difference in risk among different types of underlying autoimmune diseases, or TNF inhibitors. Method: Separate searches were conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception until March 1, 2024. Observational studies assessing the association between anti-TNF therapy and inflammatory CNS diseases relative to a comparator group. Study eligibility assessment and data extraction were independently conducted by two investigators following PRISMA guidelines. The risk ratio (RR) was used as the effect measure of the pooled analysis. The primary outcome was the risk of incident inflammatory CNS events after anti-TNF therapy for autoimmune diseases. Secondary analyses were performed based on different types of underlying autoimmune diseases and TNF inhibitors. Results: Eighteen studies involving 1,118,428 patients with autoimmune diseases contributing over 5,698,532 person-years of follow-up were analyzed. The incidence rates of new-onset inflammatory CNS events after initiating TNF inhibitors ranged from 2.0 to 13.4 per 10,000 person-years. Overall, exposure to TNF inhibitors was associated with a 33% increased risk of any inflammatory CNS diseases compared to conventional therapies (RR = 1.36, 95%CI 1.01-1.84; I2 = 49%), mainly attributed to demyelinating diseases (RR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.04-1.81; I2 = 31%). Secondary analyses revealed a similar risk of inflammatory CNS diseases across different types of underlying autoimmune diseases (rheumatic diseases: RR 1.36, 95%CI 0.84-2.21; inflammatory bowel disease 1.49, 95%CI 0.93-2.40; P for subgroup = 0.74) and TNF inhibitors (anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies versus etanercept: RR 1.04, 95%CI 0.93-1.15, I2 = 0%). Conclusions: Compared to conventional therapies, exposure to TNF inhibitors exposure was associated with a 36% increased risk of inflammatory CNS diseases, irrespective of background autoimmune diseases or TNF inhibitor types.

Screening practices, efficacy, safety and adherence to biologic therapies in a South African tertiary hospital

IntroductionThe high cost and concern of adverse events, particularly infections, limit the use of biologic therapies. We undertook this retrospective study to document their use for immune-mediated diseases, and explore the screening practices, efficacy, safety, and adherence to bDMARDs in a tertiary hospital.MethodsA folder review of all adult and paediatric patients treated for IMDs with bDMARDs. Changes in disease activity were measured by disease-specific tools at 6, 12, 24-months and at the last available visit, and patient adherence to bDMARDs was explored by folder and pharmacy record review.ResultsWe studied 120 folders; 145 bDMARDs were prescribed (23 patients switched bDMARD). BDMARDs prescribed included tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) (76), rituximab (54), tocilizumab (9), anakinra (3), abatacept (1), ustekinumab (1) and tofacitinib (1). The vast majority of patients had an excellent response and achieved low disease activity or remission at their last available visit. Adverse events included severe infection (9) including two cases of tuberculosis (TB), mild skin reaction (6) and severe infusion reactions (4). Therapy was discontinued in 13 patients, most commonly due to infection (5), lack of response (4), or poor adherence (3). Poor adherence was noted in 8/120 (6.7%). Complete latent TB infection screening was performed in only 35 patients (29.2%). Screening for Hepatitis B, C and HIV was performed in 28 (23.3%), 62 (51.7%) and 61 (50.8%) patients, respectively. Only 20.8% and 20.0% received the influenza and pneumococcal vaccination.Discussion and conclusionBiologic therapy was effective, and the most important serious adverse effect was infection, which was significantly associated with TNFi therapy. Vaccination and screening for TB, viral hepatitis and HIV was suboptimal. Of concern, poor adherence to bDMARDs was frequently encountered.

S87 Use of Tofacitinib as an Alternative in Moderately Severe Ulcerative Colitis in Pediatric Patients Refractory to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Therapy

S87 Use of Tofacitinib as an Alternative in Moderately Severe Ulcerative Colitis in Pediatric Patients Refractory to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Therapy