P877 A comparison of vedolizumab and ustekinumab treatment in patients with Ulcerative Colitis after failure of treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitor

Abstract

Abstract Background Data comparing vedolizumab (VDZ) and ustekinumab (UST) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) previously treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) and followed with regular serum-drug measurements are scarce. In the national pharmaceutical tender system of Norway, VDZ was listed as the first drug of choice after failed TNFi treatment from 2016 to 2019 and UST from 2020 to 2022. We aimed to compare drug persistence, effectiveness, drug dosing and disease activity in patients treated with VDZ or UST after failed TNFi therapy. Methods We included patients who had failed at least one TNFi and started either VDZ treatment (years 2016-2019) or UST (years 2020-2022). Patients were followed for one year after initiating the treatment or until discontinuation. Prospectively recorded data were obtained from the electronic patient journal (EPJ) and the local IBD-registry. Clinical remission was defined as 6-point Mayo Score ≤1, and biochemical remission was defined as CRP<5 mg/L and FC<250 µg/g. Patients were followed with regular serum-drug measurements and dose adjustments were made at the discretion of the treating physician based on serum-drug measurements and clinical activity at follow-up visits. Wilcoxon signed rank and Mann Whitney U test were used to assess differences in paired and unpaired data, respectively. Results A total of 116 patients were included, 59 treated with VDZ and 57 with UST. At 52 weeks, there was no difference in estimated drug persistence with 85% [73-92] for VDZ and 92% [80-96] for UST. Clinical remission increased significantly in both groups (Table 1), and no difference was found between UST and VDZ for clinical remission at week 0 and 52 (OR=2.1 [0.9-4.5] and OR=0.9 [0.3-2.3]). Contrary to the VDZ group, there was a significant decrease in CRP from week 0 to 52 in the UST group, while FC decreased significantly in both groups (Table 1). The proportion of patients in biochemical remission increased in the UST group while there was no significant change in the VDZ group. Significantly more patients treated with UST received an intensified treatment regime at 52 weeks (interval less than eight weeks) compared to VDZ treated patients (87% (95% CI [74-94]) vs 59% (95% CI [45-72])). Conclusion This study demonstrates that one-year drug persistence and clinical remission were high and comparable in both UST and VDZ treated UC patients with previous TNFi failure. Treatment with UST, but not VDZ, was associated with a significant increase in the proportion of patients in biochemical remission from induction to 52 weeks. However, a significantly larger proportion of patients treated with UST received intensified dosing at 52 weeks compared with VDZ treated patients.