Tube Group Research Articles

Safety and short-term outcomes of a modified valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy versus gastric tube anastomosis after laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundThere is no optimal reconstruction method after proximal gastrectomy. The valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy can reduce postoperative reflux esophagitis, but it is technically complex with a long operation time. The gastric tube anastomosis is technically simple, but the incidences of reflux esophagitis and anastomotic stricture are higher.MethodsWe have devised a modified valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy after laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy (LAPG), the arch-bridge anastomosis. After reviewing our prospectively maintained gastric cancer database, 43 patients who underwent LAPG from November 2021 to April 2023 were included in this cohort study, with 25 patients received the arch-bridge anastomosis and 18 patients received gastric tube anastomosis. The short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups to evaluate the efficacy of the arch-bridge anastomosis. Reporting was consistent with the STROCSS 2021 guideline.ResultsThe median operation time was 180 min in the arch-bridge group, significantly shorter than the gastric tube group (p = 0.003). In the arch-bridge group, none of the 25 patients experienced anastomotic leakage, while one patient (4%) experienced anastomotic stricture requiring endoscopic balloon dilation. The postoperative length of stay was shorter in the arch-bridge group (9 vs. 11, p = 0.034). None of the patients in the arch-bridge group experienced gastroesophageal reflux and used proton pump inhibitor (PPI), while four (22.2%) patients in the gastric tube group used PPI (p = 0.025). The incidence of reflux esophagitis (Los Angeles grade B or more severe) by endoscopy was lower in the arch-bridge group (0% vs. 25.0%).ConclusionThe arch-bridge anastomosis is a safe, time-saving, and feasible reconstruction method. It can reduce postoperative reflux and anastomotic stricture incidences in a selected cohort of patients undergoing laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy.Graphical abstract

Effectiveness of long-term tube feeding intervention in preventing skeletal muscle loss after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Esophageal cancer is a lethal tumor typically treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. For patients undergoing esophagectomy, postoperative enteral nutrition is important in preventing complications. Sarcopenia is associated with poor postoperative outcomes in esophageal cancer. In this study, we evaluated the benefits of tube feeding intervention and compared its short- and long-term outcomes in patients who underwent esophagectomy. Propensity score matching was performed in 303 patients who underwent esophagectomy at Kobe University Hospital between 2010 and 2020. Patients were divided into feeding and nonfeeding jejunostomy tube groups (n = 70 each). The feeding jejunostomy tube group was further divided into long-term (≥ 60days) and short-term (< 60days) subgroups. The groups were then retrospectively compared regarding postoperative albumin levels, body weight, and psoas muscle area and volume. In the long-term feeding jejunostomy tube group, anastomotic leakage (p = 0.013) and left laryngeal nerve palsy (p = 0.004) occurred frequently. There were no significant between-group differences in postoperative albumin levels, body weight, or psoas muscle area. However, significant psoas muscle volume recovery was confirmed in the long-term jejunostomy tube group at 6months postoperatively (p = 0.041). Tube feeding intervention after minimally invasive esophagectomy may attenuate skeletal muscle mass loss and help prevent sarcopenia.

Comparison of quality-of-life after proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction versus gastric tube reconstruction in patients with proximal gastric cancer

Objective: To compare the surgical safety and postoperative quality of life between proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction (PG-DT) and proximal gastrectomy with gastric tube reconstruction (PG-GT) for proximal gastric cancer. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of clinical and follow-up data of 99 patients with proximal gastric cancer who had undergone double tract or gastric tube surgery in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from January 2016 to September 2021. We allocated them to two groups according to surgical procedure, namely a double tract group (PG-DT, 50 patients) and gastric tube group (PG-GT, 49 patients). Proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction entails constructing a Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy after severing the proximal stomach, and then constructing a side-to-side anastomosis between the residual stomach and the jejunum to establish an anti-reflux barrier and thus minimize postoperative gastroesophageal reflux. Proximal gastrectomy with gastric tube reconstruction entails severing the proximal gastric stomach, constructing a tubular shaped gastric remnant, and then using a linear stapler to directly anastomose the posterior wall of the esophagus to the anterior wall of the resultant gastric tube. The primary end point was the quality of life of the two groups 1 year postoperatively (post-gastrectomy syndrome assessment scale: the higher the scores for change in body mass, food intake per meal, meal quality subscale, total physical health measurement, and total mental health measurement, the better the quality-of-life, and the higher the scores for other indicators, the worse the quality-of-life). The secondary end points were intraoperative and postoperative status, changes in nutritional status 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, and long-term postoperative complications (gastroesophageal reflux, anastomotic stenosis, intestinal obstruction, and gastric emptying disorder 1 year postoperatively). Results: In the PG-DT group, there were 35 (70%) men and 15 (30%) women, 33 (66.0%) patients were aged <65 years, and 37 (74.0%) of them had a body mass index of 18-25 kg/m2; whereas in the PG-GT group, there were 41 (83.7%) men and eight (16.3%) women, 21 (42.9%) patients aged <65 years, and 34 (69.4%) patients with a body mass index of 18-25 kg/m2. There were no significant differences in baseline data between the two groups except for age (P=0.021). There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph node dissected, length of hospital stay, and incidence of perioperative complications between the two groups (all P>0.05). Compared with the PG-GT group, the incidence and severity of postoperative reflux esophagitis were significantly lower in the PG-DT group (4.0% [2/50] vs. 26.5% [13/49], χ2=13.507, P=0.009). The incidences of postoperative anastomotic stenosis, intestinal obstruction, and gastric retention did not differ significantly between the two groups (all P>0.05). Patients in the PG-DT group had better quality-of-life scores for esophageal reflux (2.8 [2.3,4.0] vs. 4.8 [3.8,5.0], Z=3.489, P<0.001), eating discomfort (2.7 [1.7,3.0] vs. 3.3 [2.7,4.0 ], Z=3.393, P=0.001), and total symptoms (2.3 [1.7,2.7] vs. 2.5 [2.2,2.9], Z=2.243, P=0.025) than those in the gastric tube group; The scores for postoperative symptoms (2.0 [1.0,3.0] vs. 2.0 [2.0, 3.0], Z=2.127, P=0.033), meals consumed (2.0 [1.0, 2.0] vs. 2.0 [2.0, 3.0], Z=3.976, P<0.001), work (1.0 [1.0, 2.0] vs. 2.0 [1.0, 2.0], Z=2.279, P=0.023] and daily life (1.7 [1.3, 2.0] vs. 2.0 [2.0, 2.3], Z=3.950, P<0.001) were better in the PG-DT than the PG-GT group. Patients in the PG-GT group scored better than those in the PG-DT group for somatic symptoms, such as anal evacuation (3.0 [2.0, 4.0] vs. 3.5 [2.0, 5.0], Z=2.345, P=0.019). There were no significant differences in hemoglobin, serum albumin, serum total protein, or weight loss 1 year postoperatively between the two groups (all P>0.05). Conclusions: The safety of double tract anastomosis for proximal gastric cancer is comparable to that of gastric tube surgery. Compared with gastric tube surgery, double tract anastomosis achieves less esophageal reflux and better quality of life, making it a preferable surgical procedure for proximal gastric cancer.

Safety and feasibility study of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection without postoperative chest tube drainage: a retrospective propensity score-matched study.

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of postoperative chest tube drainage (CTD) on safety and postoperative recovery by comparing patients with pulmonary nodule undergoing uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection with and without postoperative CTD. We retrospectively analysed the data of patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection for pulmonary nodule at our hospital between 2018 and 2022. In cases where a 12-Fr chest tube was used following the procedure, the tube was not usually removed until the day after surgery. Therefore, the eligible patients were categorized into the drainage tube or the no-drainage tube group according to the use of postoperative CTD. Propensity score matching at a ratio of 1:1 was performed using clinicopathologic and demographic variables. The highest postoperative pain score, postoperative complication rate, postoperative length of stay and hospitalization costs were compared between the 2 groups. A total of 275 eligible patients, including 150 and 125 patients in the drainage tube and no-drainage tube groups, respectively, were included in the study. After propensity score matching, there were 102 patients in each group. The postoperative complication rate during hospitalization and at 1 week and 1 month after discharge were not significantly different between the 2 groups (P > 0.05 for all). The highest postoperative pain score was significantly lower in the no-drainage tube group than in the drainage tube group [2.02 (standard deviation: 0.81) days vs 2.31 (standard deviation: 0.76) days, P = 0.008]. The postoperative length of stay was significantly shorter in the no-drainage tube group than in the drainage tube group {3.00 [interquartile ranges (IQRs): 2.00-4.00] days vs 2.00 (IQRs: 1.00-3.00) days, P < 0.001}. Similarly, the total hospitalization costs were significantly lower in the no-drainage tube group than in the drainage tube group [33283.74 (IQRs: 27098.61-46718.56) yuan vs 26598.67 (IQRs: 22965.14-29933.67) yuan, P < 0.001]. Omission of postoperative CTD was safe and feasible in patients with pulmonary nodule undergoing wedge resection. The no-postoperative-drainage policy can substantially shorten the length of hospital stay and reduce the postoperative pain and hospitalization costs without increasing the risk of postoperative complications.

Impact of zero anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy followed by whole stomach reconstruction for esophageal cancer: prospective cohort study.

The stomach is the most common organ which is used for reconstruction after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. It is controversial which is better narrow gastric tube reconstruction or whole stomach reconstruction to prevent anastomotic leakage. From August 2022 to March 2023, we started a prospective cohort study of whole stomach reconstruction after esophagectomy. Until then (from January 2018 to July 2022), narrow gastric tube reconstruction was performed as a standard reconstruction. Narrow gastric tube reconstruction and whole stomach reconstruction were performed in 183 patients and 20 patients, respectively. The patient's characteristics were not significantly different between the narrow gastric tube group and the whole stomach group. In particular, for all patients in the whole stomach reconstruction group, retrosternal route and esophagogastrostomy by hand sewn were applied. There were no occurrences of AL through the continuous 20 cases in the whole stomach group, otherwise 42 (22.9%) patients in the narrow gastric group (P = 0.016). Postoperative hospital stays were significantly shorter in the whole stomach group than in the narrow gastric group (21days vs. 28days, P < .001). Blood perfusions were evaluated by indocyanine green for all cases, which had very good blood perfusion in all cases. Additionally, quantitative blood perfusion was examined by SPY-QP (Stryker, USA) for one case. Even the edge of the fornix showed more than 90% blood perfusion levels when the antrum was fixed as the reference point. Whole stomach reconstruction with excellent blood perfusion is considered to be safe and has the possibility to prevent from occurring AL after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer patients.

Double J stent combined with pyelostomy tube in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a 5-year clinical experience in a single center

ObjectiveTo compare the outcome of using a double J (DJ) stent combined with pyelostomy tube with a DJ stent alone in laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).MethodsA retrospective review of all patients with UPJO treated with LP between January 2017 and November 2021 was conducted in our center. According to different postoperative drainage methods patients were divided into a DJ stent group (52 cases) and a DJ stent combined with pyelostomy tube group (combination group, 41 cases). Operative time, bleeding volume, perirenal drainage stent removal time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, and renal function recovery were compared between the two groups. Renal ultrasound and diuretic renogram (DR) were used for preoperative and postoperative follow-up.ResultsA total of 52 patients were in the DJ stent group and 41 patients in the combination group. The mean hospital stay was 6.46 ± 2.66 days in the DJ stent group and 5.22 ± 1.63 days in the combination group (p < 0.05). Postoperative complications developed in 14 out of 52 patients in the DJ stent group (26.9%), while complications developed in 8 out of 41 patients in the combination group (19.5%) (p > 0.05). Non-catheter-related complications developed in 10/52 patients in the DJ stent group (19.2%) and only 1/41 patients in the combination group (2.4%) (p < 0.05). The renal function and renal cortex thickness in both groups were improved.ConclusionBoth the DJ stent drainage and the DJ stent combined with pyelostomy drainage are safe and effective. We should fully consider the patient’s preoperative and intraoperative conditions and choose appropriate drainage methods. A DJ stent combined with pyelostomy tube can reduce non-catheter related complications, facilitate postoperative recovery, and the hospital stay was significantly shorter than the DJ stent group. However, it is necessary to pay attention to the nursing treatment of the pyelostomy tube and guard against the occurrence of pyelostomy tube shedding.

Comparison of shear bond strength and residual adhesive remnants on the enamel surface after debonding of three different orthodontic molar tubes : Ascanning electron microscope study.

The aim for this research was to evaluate and compare the impact, bond strength, and residual adhesive on the enamel surface after debonding of different orthodontic molar tubes. The tested materials were metal, composite, and newly introduced ceramic orthodontic molar tubes. In all, 66first molar teeth were randomly divided into three groups. Metal, glass-fiber composite and ceramic orthodontic molar tubes were bonded and shear bond strength (SBS) tests were performed. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores after debonding were recorded and the enamel surfaces were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) after the adhesives were cleaned. The mean SBS values of the metal and ceramic tube groups were significantly higher than that of the glass-fiber composite tube group. The highest SBS values were recorded for the ceramic tube group (11.09 ± 2.51 MPa). Failure typically occurred at the adhesive-enamel interface in the ceramic group, whereas the majority of the samples in the glass-fiber composite group showed failure at the adhesive-tube base interface according to ARI and SEM investigations. ARI1 and ARI2 scores were commonly observed for the metal tube group. All the molar tubes tested had generated clinically acceptable SBS values; however, the values for glass-fiber composite molar tubes were significantly lower than those for the ceramic and metal molar tubes. If the debonding procedure is performed carefully, the ceramic molar tubes may be an enamel-safe product for patients seeking fully esthetic orthodontic treatment.

T‑tube versus internal drainage tube in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

The 203 patients who underwent laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into internal drainage tube group (n=87) and T-tube group (n=116). Total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase (AST), aspartate aminotransferase (ALT), the diameter of common bile duct, number of stones, operation time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Possible influencing factors were selected as independent variables, and the operation mode was selected as the dependent variable for multifactor unconditional logistic regression analysis. There were no significant differences in the sex, age, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, AST, ALT, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative biliary leaks between the two groups (P>0.05). The diameter of the common bile duct was smaller and the incidence of multiple stones in the common bile duct was lower in the internal drainage tube group compared with that in the T-tube group (P<0.05). The results of multifactor unconditional logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the diameter of the common bile duct and the number of stones in the common bile duct were associated with the operation mode as influencing factors. In conclusion, Patients with multiple stones in the common bile duct or with a wide diameter of the common bile duct are more likely to have T-tube placed rather than an internal drainage tube.

A systematic review of the safety and tolerability evaluation of enteral nutrition in a prone position with acute respiratory distress syndrome

To systematically review safety and tolerance of enteral nutrition (EN) in a prone position, as well as the risks of increased gastric residual volume (GRV), vomiting, aspiration, and ventilator-associated pneumonia, and determine the ways to improve EN tolerance in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Databases including PubMed, Embase and Wanfang Medical data of the English and Chinese literatures were retrieved up from January 1979 to January 2022 to collet the randomized controlled trial (RCT), non-RCT, and observational studies, concerning safety and tolerance of EN in a prone position with ARDS. All trials must have a minimum of two patient groups, one of which must be prone to ARDS and receive EN. Data searching extracting and quality evaluation were assessed by two reviewers independently. RevMan 5.4 software was used for analysis. A total of 9 studies were included, including 2 RCTs, 2 non-RCTs, 4 prospective observational studies, and 1 retrospective observational study. The starting and increasing rate of EN were typically well tolerated in the prone position compared to the supine position in patients with ARDS, there was no significant increase in GRV (mL: 95 vs. 110), and the incidence of vomiting was not noticeably higher (0%-35% vs. 33%-57%). The incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia with EN was not significantly higher in the prone position than in the supine position in patients with ARDS (6%-35% vs. 15%-24%). Aspiration occurred at a similar rate in patients in the nasogastric tube and post-pyloric feeding groups with EN in patients with ARDS in the prone position (22% vs. 20%). EN tolerability with nasogastric and nasojejunal tubes was similar in prone positions, with no significant difference in EN intolerance incidences (15% vs. 22%). Head elevation (30 degree angle-45 degree angle) improved EN tolerance in the prone position in patients with ARDS, thereby increasing the early EN dose [odds ratio (OR) = 0.48, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 0.22-1.08, P = 0.08]. Additionally, prophylactic application of gastrointestinal motility drugs, such as erythromycin, at the start of EN in a prone position significantly improved patients' EN tolerance (OR = 1.14, 95%CI was 0.63-2.05, P = 0.67). The use of gastric tube for EN in prone position and similar feeding speed to the supine position in patients with ARDS is safe and well tolerated. The initiation and dosing of EN should not be delayed in the prone position. EN tolerance may be increased by elevating the head of the bed during enteral feeding in a prone position, and gastrointestinal motility medications should be promptly administered with EN initiation in patients with ARDS.

Tube Versus Trabeculectomy IRIS Registry Study: 1-Year Secondary Treatment Outcomes

To describe 1-year secondary outcomes in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy IRIS® (Intelligent Registry In Sight) Registry Study (TVTIRIS), and to compare to the TVT randomized controlled trial (TVTRCT). TVTIRIS was a retrospective cohort study. The 2013-2017 IRIS Registry was used to identify eyes that received a tube shunt (tube) or trabeculectomy after a previous trabeculectomy and/or cataract surgery and had 1 year of follow-up. The TVTRCT compared a Baerveldt 350-mm2 glaucoma implant to trabeculectomy in similar eyes. In the TVTIRIS cohort, the tube (n=236, 56.3%) and trabeculectomy (n=183, 43.7%) groups had similar and significant reductions in intraocular pressure (IOP) from baseline to 1 year. In the tube group, IOP (mean ± SD) decreased from 26.6 ± 6.5 mm Hg at baseline to 14.3 ± 4.8 mm Hg at 1 year. In the trabeculectomy group, IOP decreased from 25.3 ± 6.4 mm Hg at baseline to 13.5 ± 5.2 mm Hg at 1 year. The trabeculectomy groups from both studies had similar 1-year IOP reduction (P=.18), although the TVTRCT cohort used fewer medications at all time points (P < .01). There were more pronounced differences in the mean IOP and medications between the tube groups in the 2 studies, presumably due to the inclusion of valved tubes in TVTIRIS. More reoperations occurred in TVTIRIS. The TVTIRIS tube and trabeculectomy groups had comparable 1-year IOP reduction, although trabeculectomy eyes used fewer glaucoma medications. The trabeculectomy group in TVTIRIS and TVTRCT had similar IOP and medication reduction at 1 year. Randomized controlled trials and electronic health record data both provide invaluable insight into surgical outcomes.

A comparative evaluation of LMA® Gastro™ versus Gastro Laryngeal Tube for airway management in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography under general anesthesia: A randomized control study

BackgroundEndoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography is fraught with anesthetic challenges. Various anesthesia techniques have been studied, ranging from sedation to general anesthesia with tracheal intubation or specialized supra-glottic airway devices. MethodsThis randomized control trial included 70 patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography under general anesthesia and divided equally into two groups, LMA® Gastro™ or Gastro-Laryngeal tube. The primary objective was to compare the 1st time success rate and the secondary outcomes included, ease of insertion, number of attempts, oropharyngeal leak pressure, occurrence of adverse events; hemodynamic and ventilatory parameters. They were also compared in terms gastroenterologist's feedback about the device. ResultsThe first-time success rate for LMA® Gastro™ group was 88.5% and for Gastro-Laryngeal tube group was 77.1% (p value = 0.10). The mean difference for ease of insertion (p value = 0.001), oropharyngeal leak pressure (p value < 0.0001), peak airway pressure (p value < 0.0001) at different time intervals were significant for LMA® Gastro™ group. Hemodynamic response in terms of mean arterial pressure at 0 min (p value = 0.021) and gastroenterologist's feedback (p value < 0.0001) for Gastro-Laryngeal tube group was shown to be statistically significant. The mean difference between two groups for number of attempts, complications, hemodynamic response, end tidal volume, EtCO2 and recovery time were statistically insignificant (p value > 0.05). There was no desaturation in both the groups. ConclusionTo conclude, LMA® Gastro™ had performed better in terms of an airway device and ventilatory efficiency even in anticipated difficult airway, on the other hand, Gastro-Laryngeal tube is more conducive for the insertion and maneuvering of a gastro-endoscope.

Comparison of the Jcerity endoscoper airway and the endotracheal tube in endoscopic esophageal variceal ligation: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Various airway techniques have been used in endoscopic esophageal variceal ligation (EVL). In this respect, Jcerity endoscoper airway (JEA) is a novel laryngeal mask airway that is designed for use in gastrointestinal endoscopy. In the present study, 164 patients who underwent EVL were randomly divided into JEA group or endotracheal tube (ETT) group (ratio: 1:1). Success rate of endoscopic procedure, endoscope insertion time, procedure duration, recovery time, airway technique extubation time, anesthesia costs, hospital stay duration, complications, and hemodynamic parameters were recorded. The success rate of EVL in the JEA group was noninferior to that in the ETT group (98.8% vs. 100.0%). The airway insertion time, anesthesia duration, and recovery time were significantly shorter in the JEA group than in the ETT group (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the blood pressure during extubation was more stable in the JEA group (p < 0.001). Moreover, there were less heart rate variations during intubation (p < 0.005) and extubation (p < 0.05) in the JEA group. Nonetheless, the endoscopists’ satisfaction scores were comparable between the two groups. Overall, our findings suggest that JEA is efficient and safe for clinical use in EVL.Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000031892, Registered April 13, 2020, https://www.chictr.org.cn/searchproj.html.

A small-sized tube versus traditional closed thoracic drainage in uniportal thoracoscopic surgery.

To assess the feasibility and safety of placing a small-sized tube as drainage in patients after uniportal thoracoscopic lung resection. Patients who received uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) lung resection were identified in our database. Patients placed small-sized tube drainage were compared with those placed conventional chest tube in terms of characteristics, operation modality, post-operative pulmonary complications, post-operative pain, chest tube duration and post-operative hospital stay. Propensity score matching was performed. Of the 217 enrolled patients, 173 were assigned to the conventional tube group and 44 were assigned to the small-sized tube group. Rates of post-operative pulmonary complications were relatively low and similar between the two groups. After propensity score matching, operation duration was shorter (1 h vs. 1.21 h, P = 0.01) was shorter, and the maximum value of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score after operation (1 vs. 1.5, P = 0.02) and the overall average value of VAS score after operation (0.33 vs. 0.88, P = 0.006) was lower in small-sized tube group. No significant difference was observed in chest tube duration (2 vs. 2, P = 0.34) and post-operative hospital stay (3 vs. 3, P = 0.34). Compared to conventional chest tubes, small-sized tubes for post-operative drainage after U-VATS lung resection may be a safe and promising approach for reducing post-operative pain.

Accuracy and efficiency of a calibration approach in dynamic navigation for implant placement: An in vitro study

Background/purposeComputer-assisted dynamic navigation surgery could provide accurate implant placement. However, its low efficiency was always criticized by dental surgeons. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of a calibration approach with reflective wafers in dynamic navigation for implant placement. Materials and methodsEighty implants were placed in the standardized polyurethane mandibular models under dynamic navigation and divided into 2 groups according to the calibration methods (n = 40). The U-shaped tube (UT) group used a prefabricated U-shaped tube embedded with radiopaque markers. The reflective wafers (RW) group used a fixation with 3 round reflective wafers as markers. Postoperative cone beam computed tomography images were obtained for implants deviation analyses. The calibration time was used to evaluate the efficiency of the 2 methods. ResultsSignificant differences were found in the trueness and efficiency between the 2 groups (P < 0.05). The 3D deviations at the implant platform and apex were smaller in UT group (0.89 ± 0.28 and 0.79 ± 0.30 mm, respectively) than in the RW group (0.99 ± 0.28 and 0.98 ± 0.30 mm, respectively). The angular deviation was larger in the UT group (2.16 ± 1.12°) than in the RW group (1.53 ± 0.88°). The calibration approach of RW group was more efficient than the UT group (2.05 ± 0.55 and 7.50 ± 0.71 min, respectively). ConclusionThe calibration method of RW improved the efficiency significantly and achieved equivalent trueness with UT for dynamic navigation during implant placement.

Clinical application of intubation-free anesthesia in radical resection of lung cancer.

In recent years, video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has become increasingly widespread. However, the implementation of VATS requires the assistance with lung isolation techniques. Spontaneous breathing with laryngeal masks is also increasingly used in VATS. However, evidence on the characteristics of intubated anesthesia is insufficient. This study aimed to explore whether intubation-free anesthesia has more advantages than other intubation methods in the clinical setting. Patients with lung tumors who underwent VATS in our hospital between June 2022 and October 2022 were included in the study. Perioperative data of patients, including basic information, intraoperative hemodynamic changes, postoperative inflammatory indicators, and adverse reactions were obtained through the electronic medical record system. According to the protocol of airway management during anesthesia, participants were divided into the following groups: laryngeal mask with spontaneous breathing group (LMSB group), laryngeal mask combined with bronchial blocker group (LM + BB group), double-lumen tube group (DLT group), and tracheal tube combined with bronchial blocker group (TT + BB group). All data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0 software. At baseline, patients in the LMSB and LM + BB groups had a lower body weight (P = 0.024). Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), and heart rate (HR) were significantly higher in the DLT group than in the non-intubated group during surgery (SBP: T1 P = 0.048, T4 P = 0.021, T5 P ≤ 0.001, T6 P ≤ 0.001, T7 P = 0.004; DBP: T5 P ≤ 0.001, T6 P ≤ 0.001, T7 P ≤ 0.001; HR: T1 P = 0.021, T6 P ≤ 0.001, T7 P = 0.007, T8 P ≤ 0.001). The input fluid (P = 0.009), urine output (P = 0.010), surgery duration (P = 0.035), and procalcitonin levels (P = 0.024) of the DLT group were also significantly higher than those of the other groups. The recovery duration of the LMSB group was significantly longer (P = 0.003) and the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions, mainly atelectasis, was higher (P = 0.012) than those of the other groups. Although the intubation-free anesthesia has less stimulation during operation and less postoperative inflammatory response, it has obvious adverse reactions after operation, which may be not the best anesthesia scheme for radical resection of lung cancer in VATS. https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=182767, identifier ChiCTR2200066180.

Recurrence-Preventive Role of Flatus Tubes Following Endoscopic Decompression in Sigmoid Volvulus.

Sigmoid volvulus may recur following endoscopic decompression. Flatus tubes are traditionally used to prevent an early recurrence. This study aims to evaluate the recurrence-preventive role of the flatus tubes in sigmoid volvulus. Sigmoid volvulus recurrence was retrospectively analyzed in prospectively collected clinical data of endoscopically decompressed 60 patients, in whom no tube, rectal tube, or sigmoidal tube was used. Mean pain/discomfort scores were higher in rectal and sigmoidal tube groups than that of no tube group (1.2 ± 0.4, 4.2 ± 0.9, and 3.5 ± 0.9, respectively, P < .001). The early recurrence was seen in 3 patients in the no tube group, while no early recurrence was determined during tube placement in the rectal and sigmoidal tube groups (15.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0%, respectively, P < .05, P < .05, and P > .05). The tubes were removed or spontaneously discharged in 13 (65.0%) and 12 patients (60.0%) in the rectal and sigmoidal tube groups, respectively, and sigmoid volvulus recurred in 2 patients in each group following the removal or spontaneous discharge. There was no statistically significant difference between the early recurrence rates of the no tube, rectal tube, and sigmoidal tube groups following the removal or spontaneous discharge of the tubes (15.0%, 15.4%, 16.7%, respectively, P > .05) and in total (15.0%, 10.0%, and 10.0%, respectively, P > .05). Flatus tubes may prevent the early volvulus recurrence during their placement in sigmoid volvulus. Nevertheless, they generally cause pain and discomfort, and they are frequently removed or spontaneously discharged, which suppresses their recurrence- preventive effects.

Why do we fear bottles and pacifiers?

Why do we fear bottles and pacifiers?

Inflammatory response to epoxy resin and calcium silicate sealers preheated with different temperatures: an in vivo study.

To determine the impact of heat exposure of different sealers on inflammatory cytokine secretions and tissue response in vivo. Silicone tubes were prefilled with epoxy resin (ER) or calcium silicate (CS) sealers, preheated at 37, 60, or 120 °C, and implanted in rat subcutaneous site. Peri-implant exudate and tissue were analyzed after 1 and 4 weeks for cytokine secretions and tissue organization. At 1 week, 120 °C-preheated CS and ER induced higher secretions of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin 6 (IL-6), respectively, as compared to sham/empty tube groups. At 4 weeks, whereas TNF-α secretion was reduced in CS, it increased in ER group, particularly for 120 °C. Both sealers revealed high IL-6 after 4 weeks as compared to sham/empty tube, and generally, higher IL-6 secretions were associated with ER. Histology at 1 week revealed lower degree of inflammatory infiltrate in the groups of the highest preheating temperature (120 °C). Nonetheless, at 4 weeks, whereas fibrous capsule area and inflammatory infiltrate remained low in the CS120 group, they were high in ER120. Preheating ER sealer to 120 °C induced high and prolonged secretion of proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IL-6), whereas this effect was transient for the CS sealer. This was associated with increased fibrous capsule and inflammatory infiltrate in response to 120 °C-preheated ER. Heat-induced changes in sealer properties alter the inflammatory response in vivo, which may affect the clinical outcome. This will not only help appropriate selection of obturation technique for different sealers, but also for optimizing the properties of new generation of sealers.

Intraoperative Transpyloric Tube Insertion for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Analysis of Japanese Study Group Data

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a severe congenital disease. Some CDH infants suffer from gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), even after surgical correction of gastric position. A transpyloric tube (TPT) is inserted into CDH patients under direct observation intraoperatively in some hospitals in Japan to establish early enteral feeding. This strategy avoids gastric expansion to maintain a better respiratory condition. However, it is unclear whether the strategy has a secure effect for patient prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of intraoperative TPT insertion on enteral feeding and postoperative weight gain. The Japanese CDH Study Group database was used to identify infants with CDH born between 2011 and 2016, who were then divided into two groups: the TPT group and gastric tube (GT) group. In the TPT group, infants underwent intraoperative TPT insertion; postoperative insertion/extraction of TPT was irrelevant to the analysis. Weight growth velocity (WGV) was calculated using the exponential model. Subgroup analysis was performed using Kitano's gastric position classification. We analyzed 204 infants, of which 99 and 105 were in the TPT and GT groups, respectively. Enteral nutrition (EN) in the TPT and GT groups was 52±39 and 44±41kcal/kg/day (p=0.17) at age 14 days (EN14), respectively, and 83±40 and 78±45kcal/kg/day (p=0.46) at age 21 days (EN21), respectively. WGV30 (WGV from day 0 to day 30) in the TPT and GT groups was 2.3±3.0 and 2.8±3.8g/kg/day (p=0.30), respectively, and WGV60 (WGV from day 0 to day 60) was 5.1±2.3 and 6.0±2.5g/kg/day (p=0.03), respectively. In infants with Kitano's Grade 2+3, EN14 in the TPT and GT groups was 38±35 and 29±35kcal/kg/day (p=0.24), respectively, EN21 was 73±40 and 58±45kcal/kg/day (p=0.13), respectively, WGV30 was 2.3±3.2 and 2.0±4.3g/kg/day (p=0.76), respectively, and WGV60 was 4.6±2.3 and 5.2±2.3g/kg/day (p=0.30), respectively. Intraoperative TPT insertion did not improve nutritional intake and WGV30. WGV60 in TPT was less than that in GT. In Grade 2+3 subgroup analysis, TPT also had no advantage. We could not recommend routine TPT insertion at surgery. III.

Routine postoperative nasogastric or nasojejunal tube placement may be unnecessary after gastric resection

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of not using routine nasogastric (NG) or nasojejunal (NJ) tubes on postoperative complications in gastric cancer patients undergoing resection. Methods: This study includes 250 patients who underwent gastric resection diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma between November 2011 and December 2021. The patients were divided into two groups: those who routinely use NG or NJ tube in the early postoperative period and those who do not. Postoperative complications and length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Results: Demographic, surgical, and histopathological characteristics were similar between the two groups. Oral feeding was started earlier in the non- NG or NJ tube group. There was no difference between the two groups regarding the length of hospital stay (p = 0.065). Severe postoperative complications (Clavien Dindo ≥ 3) were significantly lower in patients who did not use a nasogastric or nasojejunal tube (p = 0.001). Two patients in the NG/NJ tube group and one in the non-NG/NJ tube group developed anastomotic leakage. Conclusions: According to the results of our study, routine NG or NJ tube use does not reduce postoperative severe complications or length of hospital stay.