THE REPORT of the fall of a giant redwood (Sequoia gigantea) in the Sequoia National Forest, 50 miles east of Visalia, California, in August, was the inspiration of a visit to obtain information as to the root-systems of these great trees and to give consideration to the facts upon which calculations of the amount of woody material in the two largest of these trees had been based.2 The uprooted tree had stood upon the eastern margin of Crescent Meadow, a bog about a hundred yards or less in width and a quarter of a mile long. It had fallen directly across the bog, as had many others of its kind in centuries past. This is to be connected with the fact that the tree recently fallen had suffered from fire which had burned the buttresses and roots at the margin of the bog, similar effects being noted in trees still standing and in the old prostrate trunks. These missing roots had occupied about one-third or one-fourth of the circumference of the base. High water level in the bog with accompanying softening of the soil was an additional factor in the overthrow of the tree; evidence of wind action was lacking. The upturned disk of soil held by the roots was about 30 ft. across with a thickness of less than 2 yds., which were also the dimensions of the pit resulting from the upheaval. The two largest roots were those issuing from the trunk on opposite sides and extending along the margins of the bog. About two dozen roots extended outward in the sector awav from the bog. These organs had been fractured about 10 to 12 ft. from the base of the tree. The stumps were visible on the rim of the upturned disk and the ends of the severed roots were to be seen on the walls of the pit resulting from the removal of the disk. No roots had penetrated the bottom of the pit. The horizontally extending roots encountered a competition of a close stand of other trees, and not much could be said as to their position in such a tangle. No evidence is available, however, to show that the roots of the redwoods ever penetrate deeply. A computation based on the above facts and upon two days' attention to other trees resulted in a conclusion that the volume of woody material in the roots-including the ones which had perished in the sector toward the bog-would not exceed 3,000 cu. ft. The trunk was 18 ft. in diameter, including the bark, 5 ft. from the surface of the soil. The top and branches had been much broken, but it was estimated that the total would have constituted a truncated cone 200 ft. in height with a diameter about 16 in. at the upper end.
Read full abstract