Truncal Soft Tissue Sarcoma Research Articles

Growth Rate and Outcomes in Locally Recurrent Extremity and Truncal Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

Improved prognostic tools are needed for patients with locally recurrent extremity or truncal soft tissue sarcoma (STS). To examine the association between average local recurrence (LR) growth rate and outcomes following resection of locally recurrent extremity or truncal STS. This retrospective cohort study used a prospectively maintained database from a single high-volume tertiary sarcoma referral center in the US to identify patients 16 years of age or older who underwent repeat resection of a locally recurrent extremity or truncal STS between July 1, 1982, and December 31, 2021. Patients with atypical lipomatous tumors, desmoid tumors, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, angiosarcomas, and prior or synchronous distant recurrence were excluded. Data were analyzed from November 1, 2022, to June 17, 2024. Average LR growth rate, defined as the sum of recurrent tumor maximal diameters divided by the disease-free interval after index operation. The primary outcomes were cumulative incidences of disease-specific death (DSD), with death from other causes as a competing risk, and second LR, with death from any cause as a competing risk. The study cohort included 253 patients (median [IQR] age, 64 [51-73] years; 140 [55.3%] male). The 5-year cumulative incidence of DSD after repeat resection was 29%. Multivariable analysis indicated that LR growth rate (hazard ratio [HR], 1.12 [95% CI, 1.08-1.18]; P < .001), younger age (HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97-0.99]; P = .002), R1 or R2 margins (HR, 1.71 [95% CI, 1.03-2.84]; P = .04), high LR grade (HR, 2.90 [95% CI, 1.17-7.20]; P = .02), and multifocality (HR, 2.92 [95% CI, 1.70-5.00]; P < .001) were independently associated with higher incidence of DSD. Using the minimum P value method, the optimal cutoff for growth rate was found to be 0.68 cm/mo. Patients with values above this cutoff had higher 5-year incidences of DSD following repeat resection (63% vs 19%; permutation test P < .001) and higher amputation rates (19% vs 7%; P = .008). Only R1 margins were independently associated with higher incidence of second LR (HR, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.19-2.78]; P = .006). In this cohort study of patients undergoing resection of a locally recurrent extremity or truncal STS, LR growth rate was independently associated with DSD. These findings suggest that patients with growth rates higher than 0.68 cm/mo who undergo LR resection may have high disease-specific mortality and amputation rates and should be considered for perioperative systemic therapy.

A phase I/II trial of neoadjuvant pegylated arginine deiminase (ADI-PEG 20) with ifosfamide and radiotherapy in soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the trunk or extremity.

TPS11591 Background: Outcomes for the treatment of metastatic STS remain poor. Better therapies are needed for local and distant control. Arginine is essential to neoplastic growth, yet up to 88% of STS do not express argininosuccinate synthetase (ASS1), an enzyme necessary to produce arginine. ADI-PEG 20 is a microbial enzyme that degrades arginine causing auxotrophy in cancer cells that are ASS1 negative. Pre-clinical data demonstrates that arginine deprivation shunts glutamine towards oxidation via the TCA cycle, thus depleting glutathione stores and increasing oxidative stress to the cell. We hypothesize that the combination of ADI-PEG 20, ifosfamide, and radiation therapy can potentiate cellular death. The encouraging safety and clinical data from the ADI-PEG 20 + radiation + temozolomide trial (NCT04587830) further support this combination. We are conducting a phase I/II trial examining the safety and tolerability to determine the recommended phase II dose (R2PD) and evaluate the efficacy of ADI-PEG 20 in combination with ifosfamide and radiation in patients with high-grade STS. Methods: Eligible patients include untreated intermediate or high-grade extremity or truncal STS planned for definitive resection with performance status 0-1 and adequate organ function. Metastatic disease is exclusionary as well as receiving prior treatment for the study cancer. The total number of patients to be enrolled is approximately 35. Up to 15 patients will be enrolled in the phase I portion with a 3 + 3 dose escalation design with ADI-PEG 20 in combination with escalating doses of ifosfamide and radiation. The primary objectives include determining safety and tolerability as well as the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Patients will be treated neoadjuvantly with ADI-PEG 20 dosed once weekly starting on Cycle 1 Day -7 with ifosfamide for up to three cycles in combination with standard radiotherapy given over approximately 5 weeks. Ifosfamide will be administered on Days 1 - 5 of all 3 cycles. The phase II participants will receive the combination with ifosfamide at the RP2D determined during phase I. The primary objective of the phase II portion is to determine the percent necrosis and pathologic complete response (pCR) at the time of resection. These endpoints will be summarized by proportions along with the associated 2-sided exact 95% CIs. Assuming the true pCR rate is 25%, enrolling 20 patients will result in a 90% CI for estimating the pCR (10%, 45%). The trial has begun accrual and is soon to open at multiple sites. Clinical trial information: NCT05813327 .

Prospective phase II trial of preoperative hypofractionated proton therapy for extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma: the PRONTO study rationale and design

BackgroundOncologic surgical resection is the standard of care for extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma (STS), often accompanied by the addition of pre- or postoperative radiation therapy (RT). Preoperative RT may decrease the risk of joint stiffness and fibrosis at the cost of higher rates of wound complications. Hypofractionated, preoperative RT has been shown to provide acceptable outcomes in prospective trials. Proton beam therapy (PBT) provides the means to decrease dose to surrounding organs at risk, such as the skin, bone, soft tissues, and adjacent joint(s), and has not yet been studied in patients with extremity and truncal sarcoma.MethodsOur study titled “PROspective phase II trial of preoperative hypofractionated protoN therapy for extremity and Truncal soft tissue sarcOma (PRONTO)” is a non-randomized, prospective phase II trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of preoperative, hypofractionated PBT for patients with STS of the extremity and trunk planned for surgical resection. Adult patients with Eastern Cooperative Group Performance Status ≤ 2 with resectable extremity and truncal STS will be included, with the aim to accrue 40 patients. Treatment will consist of 30 Gy radiobiological equivalent of PBT in 5 fractions delivered every other day, followed by surgical resection 2–12 weeks later. The primary outcome is rate of major wound complications as defined according to the National Cancer Institute of Canada Sarcoma2 (NCIC-SR2) Multicenter Trial. Secondary objectives include rate of late grade ≥ 2 toxicity, local recurrence-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival at 1- and 2-years, functional outcomes, quality of life, and pathologic response.DiscussionPRONTO represents the first trial evaluating the use of hypofractionated PBT for STS. We aim to prove the safety and efficacy of this approach and to compare our results to historical outcomes established by previous trials. Given the low number of proton centers and limited availability, the short course of PBT may provide the opportunity to treat patients who would otherwise be limited when treating with daily RT over several weeks. We hope that this trial will lead to increased referral patterns, offer benefits towards patient convenience and clinic workflow efficiency, and provide evidence supporting the use of PBT in this setting.Trial registration: NCT05917301 (registered 23/6/2023).

ASO Visual Abstract: High Community-Level Social Vulnerability is Associated with Worse Recurrence-Free Survival Following Resection of Extremity and Truncal Soft-Tissue Sarcoma.

ASO Visual Abstract: High Community-Level Social Vulnerability is Associated with Worse Recurrence-Free Survival Following Resection of Extremity and Truncal Soft-Tissue Sarcoma.

ASO Author Reflections: Is a Patient's Home Address Associated with Survival Outcomes After Surgery for Extremity and Truncal Soft Tissue Sarcoma?

ASO Author Reflections: Is a Patient's Home Address Associated with Survival Outcomes After Surgery for Extremity and Truncal Soft Tissue Sarcoma?

High Community-Level Social Vulnerability is Associated with Worse Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS) After Resection of Extremity and Truncal Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

Although social vulnerability has been associated with worse postoperative and oncologic outcomes in other cancer types, these effects have not been characterized in patients with soft tissue sarcoma. This study evaluated the association of social vulnerability and oncologic outcomes. The authors conducted a single-institution cohort study of adult patients with primary and locally recurrent extremity or truncal soft tissue sarcoma undergoing resection between January 2016 and December 2021. The social vulnerability index (SVI) was measured on a low (SVI 1-39%, least vulnerable) to high (60-100%, most vulnerable) SVI scale. The association of SVI with overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression. The study identified 577 patients. The median SVI was 44 (interquartile range [IQR], 19-67), with 195 patients categorized as high SVI and 265 patients as low SVI. The median age, tumor size, histologic subtype, grade, comorbidities, stage, follow-up time, and perioperative chemotherapy and radiation utilization were similar between the high and low SVI cohorts. The patients with high SVI had worse OS (p = 0.07) and RFS (p = 0.016) than the patients with low SVI. High SVI was independently associated with shorter RFS in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.54) but not with OS (HR, 1.47; 95% CI 0.84-2.56). High community-level social vulnerability appears to be independently associated with worse RFS for patients undergoing resection of extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma. The effect of patient and community-level social risk factors should be considered in the treatment of patients with extremity sarcoma.

Emerging innovations and advancements in the treatment of extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcomas.

In this special edition update on soft tissue sarcomas (STS), we cover classifications, emerging technologies, prognostic tools, radiation schemas, and treatment disparities in extremity and truncal STS. We discuss the importance of enhancing local control and reducing complications, including the role of innovative imaging, surgical guidance, and hypofractionated radiation. We review advancements in systemic and immunotherapeutic treatments and introduce disparities seen in this vulnerable population that must be considered to improve overall patient care.

Pre-Operative Radiotherapy in STS: Does Downsizing Matter?

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a rare but insidious tumor that arises from mesenchymal tissue. Preoperative RT, followed by resection, is routinely used in extremity and truncal STS. The impact of RT on tumor volume and implications for prognosis is a great concern for patients, as changes in volume is often perceived as a reflection of treatment response. To date, data between tumor volume changes after RT and overall survival (OS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in STS is sparse. In this study, we investigate changes in tumor volume after preoperative RT and its impact on OS and DMFS. Between 2000 and 2022, patients with stage I-III primary sarcoma of the extremity or trunk treated with pre-operative RT and wide resection were retrospectively reviewed from a prospective repository. Tumors were contoured using T2 sequences on MRIs within 2 weeks of initiation of RT and within 4 weeks post-RT. Tumor volume was determined using the medical image merge software. Univariate analysis (UVA) was performed using the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis (MVA) was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. One hundred thirty-two patients had both pre- and post-RT MRIs available for contours. Median follow-up was 6 years. Median age at diagnosis was 56 years (range = 19-92). Most patients had stage III (73%) disease in the lower extremity (75%). The most common histology was undifferentiated sarcoma (30%). Median dose was 50 Gy in 25 fractions. Chemotherapy was administered in 44 (33%) patients. Median tumor volume prior to and after RT was 198 cc (range = 7.49 - 3899.87) and 225.21 cc (range = 0-9879.2), respectively. A decrease in tumor volume was seen in 90 patients (68%) from pre- to post-RT. In these patients, the mean percent change was -35%. Forty-two patients had an increase in tumor volume post-RT with a mean percent change of 56%. Overall local control was 98%. The 2- and 5-year OS were 89% and 76%, respectively. The 2- and 5-year DMFS was 76% and 70%, respectively. On UVA, increased age (p < 0.001), KPS ≤80 (p = 0.002), and smokers (p = 0.009) were associated with decreased OS. No variables were associated with DMFS. On MVA, age (p = 0.01) was associated with decreased OS and female gender (p = 0.03) and high-grade disease was associated with decreased DMFS (p = 0.04) Change in tumor volume did not impact OS (p = 0.15) or DMFS (p = 0.75). The 2- and 5-year DMFS for patients with a decrease in tumor volume was 79% and 71%, respectively. The 2 and 5-year DMFS for patients with an increase in tumor volume was 77% and 70%, respectively. The 2- and 5-year OS for patients with a decrease in tumor volume was 92% and 80%, respectively. The 2 and 5-year OS for patients with an increase in tumor volume was 83% and 69%, respectively. Change in tumor volume did not significantly impact OS and DMFS. Further studies with an increased sample size are warranted to corroborate these findings, however these results may assuage patient anxieties about the perceived tumor response to RT.

Outcomes of plastic surgical reconstruction in extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma:Results from the US Sarcoma Collaborative.

This study aimed to define how utilization of plastic surgical reconstruction (PSR) affects perioperative outcomes, locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), and overall survival (OS) after radical resection of extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma (ETSTS). The secondary aim was to determine factors associated with PSR. Patients who underwent resection of ETSTS between 2000 and 2016 were identified from a multi-institutional database. PSR was defined as complex primary closure requiring a plastic surgeon, skin graft, or tissue-flap reconstruction. Outcomes included PSR utilization, postoperative complications, LRRFS, and OS. Of 2750 distinct operations, 1060 (38.55%) involved PSR. Tissue-flaps (854, 80.57%) were most commonly utilized. PSR was associated with a higher proportion of R0 resections (83.38% vs. 74.42%, p < 0.001). Tissue-flap PSR was associated with local wound complications (odds ratio: 1.81, confidence interval: 1.21-2.72, p = 0.004). Neither PSR nor postoperative complications were independently associated with LRRFS or OS. High-grade tumors (1.60, 1.13-2.26, p = 0.008) and neoadjuvant radiation (1.66, 1.20-2.30, p = 0.002) were associated with the need for PSR. Patients with ETSTS undergoing resection with PSR experienced acceptable rates of complications and a higher rate of negative margins, which were associated with improved LRRFS and OS. High tumor grade and neoadjuvant radiation were associated with requirement of PSR.

Evaluation of two modalities of perioperative treatment in the management ofextremity andtruncalsoft tissue sarcomas: neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy and sequential treatment.

Patients with locally advanced grade 2-3 extremity/truncal soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are at high risk of recurrence. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and feasibility of neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) in selected grade 2-3patients with limb or trunk wall STS, and to compare this schedule to asequential approach combining neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy. We retrospectively included patients who underwent neoadjuvant cCRT at two comprehensive cancer centers from 1992-2016. We then compared these results to those of patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy and postoperative radiotherapy from athird comprehensive cancer center with apropensity score matched analysis. Atotal of 53patients were treatedby neoadjuvant cCRT; 58patients could be matched with 29patients in each treatment group after propensity score matching. Disease-free survival and overall survival at 5years were 54.9 and 63.5%, respectively with neoadjuvant cCRT, with no significant difference when compared to the sequential treatment group. R0resection rate was higher (90.9 vs 44.8%, p < 0.01) in the cCRT group than in the sequential treatment group during ashorter therapeutic sequence (118 vs 210.5days, p < 0.01), with no impact on the surgical procedure or postoperative complications. cCRT is feasible with acceptable immediate and late toxicities. It could facilitate surgery by increasing the R0resection rate and improve patient compliance by shortening the therapeutic sequence.

Radiation Therapy in Primary Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Superficial Trunk.

Despite anatomical differences, truncal soft tissue sarcomas (STS) often are grouped with extremity sarcomas. We evaluated the clinical outcome of patients with truncal STS who underwent gross total resection (GTR) and radiation therapy (RT), with special emphasis on those treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). From January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2018, 64 patients received GTR and RT, where 48 patients were male, 35 patients were aged ≤ 60 years, and 48 patients had tumors ≤ 10 cm. Sixty-two tumors were high grade, 36 were in the chest wall, 7 in the abdominal wall, and 21 were paraspinal. During surgery, 7 received mesh reconstruction, and 6 received flap closure. R0 resection was achieved in 53 patients. Thirteen patients received chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 57 months, the 5-year actuarial local control (LC) was 71%. In the IMRT subset (50/64, 78%), the 5-year LC for the chest/abdominal wall was 84%, and 69% for the paraspinal subsite. Grade 2+ radiation dermatitis was seen in 21 of 64 (33%) patients, 5 of 64 (8%) developed noninfectious wound complications, 5 of 64 (8%) developed infectious wound complications, and 1 of 64 (2%) developed grade 2 chest wall pain. No additional grade 2+ late toxicity was observed. Based on this study, achieving LC in truncal STS treated with GTR and RT remains challenging even with IMRT (5-year LC: 78%). While the use of IMRT was more promising for tumors of the chest/abdominal wall with 5-year LC of 84%, it was 69% for those located in the paraspinal subsite, indicating a need for further improvement.

Evolving Strategies for Reconstruction of Truncal Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

Evolving Strategies for Reconstruction of Truncal Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

Opportunistic muscle measurements on staging chest CT for extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma are associated with survival.

Computed tomography (CT) measurements of sarcopenia have been proposed as biomarkers associated with outcomes in various cancers and have typically been evaluated at the L3 vertebral level. However, staging imaging for patients with extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma (STS) often only includes chest CT imaging which precludes evaluation at L3. Therefore, we sought to evaluate muscle metrics at T12 on standard staging chest CT scans and evaluate for correlation with overall and event-free survival in patients with STS. CT chest imaging for 89 patients with intermediate and high-grade STS (53 male, 36 female; 58.5 ± 19.0 years old, follow-up 37.4 ± 27.1 months) was reviewed on PACS at T12 for skeletal muscle density (SMD) and skeletal muscle index (SMI). Overall survival increased with increased SMD on univariate (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61 [0.43, 0.86]) and age-adjusted analysis (HR = 0.65 [0.42, 0.89]. Event-free survival also increased with increased SMD in univariate analyses (HR = 0.68 [0.49, 0.95]) but did not maintain significance after adjusting for age (HR = 0.68 [0.43, 1.07]). SMI was not a predictor of overall or event-free survival. Higher SMD measured on routinely obtained staging chest CTs in STS patients is associated with improved survival.

Predictors of oncologic outcome in patients with and without flap reconstruction after extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcomas

BackgroundSoft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremities or trunk often require plastic reconstructive transfer of vital tissue for wound closure after resection. Literature on the oncologic outcome of patients receiving flap closure in comparison with patients receiving primary wound closure is very limited. MethodsPatients who underwent resection of a primary extremity or truncal STS without dissemination at our institution between January 2000 until December 2015 were eligible for the study. Patients were divided into two groups based on type of soft tissue closure (primary or flap) while patients receiving skin grafting were excluded. Characteristics, oncologic outcome and prognostic factors of both groups were compared. Results781 patients could be included, of these 200 had received flap closure and 581 primary wound closure. Tumors receiving flap closure were significantly smaller but were located in distal extremities and showed a trend towards prior neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Incidence of wound and general complications was similar in both groups. 5-year local recurrence free survival (LRFS, 71% vs. 69%) and 5-year disease specific survival (DSS, 84% vs. 88%) did not differ significantly between patients with primary closure and flap closure. Most important predictors in both groups were tumor size and grading with no major differences in analysis of predictors for both endpoints. ConclusionPlastic reconstructive surgery plays an important role in limb-conserving STS treatment. Complication rates of patients with flap coverage are not higher than of patients with primary wound closure and oncologic outcome is similar with no major differences in predictors of LRFS and DSS.

The Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Truncal and Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas: An Analysis from the National Cancer Database

The aim of this study was to determine the association between lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and overall survival (OS) in truncal/extremity soft tissue sarcomas (STS). The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for all patients, ages 18-85years, who underwent resection of primary, truncal/extremity STS between 2010 and 2012, and had LVI data. The primary endpoint was OS. Among 6169 patients identified, the most common histology groups were (1) liposarcoma (LPS, 24%), (2) undifferentiated pleiomorphic sarcoma (UPS, 19%), and (3) leiomyosarcoma (LMS, 15%); 449 patients (7%) were LVI-positive. There were no differences in demographics or comorbidities between the LVI groups. Compared with LVI-negative patients, LVI-positive patients were more likely to have larger (> 5cm: 80% vs. 66%), deep (80% vs. 68%), and high-grade tumors (82% vs. 57%). They were also more likely to have positive margins (27% vs. 17%), nodal (16% vs. 2%) and metastatic disease (21% vs. 4%), and receive chemotherapy (37% vs. 18%; all p < 0.001). LVI was associated with worse median OS (39months vs. MNR; p < 0.001), which persisted on stratum-specific analyses for all tumor grades, size categories, and stages I-III, but not stage IV. On multivariable Cox regression, LVI was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39-2.44), while accounting for other significant prognostic factors. Among non-metastatic, curative-intent resections (n = 5696), LVI was still associated with worse OS (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.28-2.49). LVI appears to be an important adverse pathologic factor in truncal and extremity STS. Even when taking into account other established prognostic factors, LVI was predictive of worse OS. Knowledge of LVI status may help to better risk-stratify patients and guide management strategies, and should be considered in future prognostic classification schemes and nomograms.

Trends in the Use of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for High-Grade Truncal and Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas

BackgroundIn the randomized controlled trial (RCT) EORTC 62931, adjuvant chemotherapy failed to show improvement in relapse-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) for patients with resected high-grade soft tissue sarcoma (STS). We evaluated whether the negative results of this 2012 RCT have influenced multidisciplinary treatment patterns for patients with high-grade STS undergoing resection at seven academic referral centers. MethodsThe U.S. Sarcoma Collaborative database was queried to identify patients who underwent curative-intent resection of primary high-grade truncal or extremity STS from 2000 to 2016. Patients with recurrent tumors, metastatic disease, and those receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. Patients were divided by treatment era into early (2000-2011, pre-European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] trial) and late (2012-2016, post-EORTC trial) cohorts for analysis. Rates of adjuvant chemotherapy and clinicopathologic variables were compared between the two cohorts. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to determine factors associated with OS and RFS. Results949 patients who met inclusion criteria were identified, with 730 patients in the early cohort and 219 in the late cohort. Adjuvant chemotherapy rates were similar between the early and late cohorts (15.6% versus 14.6%; P = 0.73). Patients within the early and late cohorts demonstrated similar median OS (128 months versus median not reached, P = 0.84) and RFS (107 months versus median not reached, P = 0.94). Receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with larger tumor size (13.6 versus 8.9 cm, P < 0.001), younger age (53.3 versus 63.7 years, P < 0.001), and receipt of adjuvant radiation (P < 0.001). On multivariate regression analysis, risk factors associated with decreased OS were increasing American Society of Anesthesiologists class (P = 0.02), increasing tumor size (P < 0.001), and margin-positive resection (P = 0.01). Adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with OS (P = 0.88). Risk factors associated with decreased RFS included increasing tumor size (P < 0.001) and margin-positive resection (P = 0.03); adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with RFS (P = 0.23). ConclusionsRates of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected high-grade truncal or extremity STS have not decreased over time within the U.S. Sarcoma Collaborative, despite RCT data suggesting a lack of efficacy. In this retrospective multi-institutional analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with RFS or OS on multivariate analysis, consistent with the results from EORTC 62931. Rates of adjuvant chemotherapy for high-grade STS were low in both cohorts but may be influenced more by selection bias based on clinicopathologic variables such as tumor size, margin status, and patient age than by prospective, randomized data.

Watch and Wait Approach for Re-excision After Unplanned Yet Macroscopically Complete Excision of Extremity and Superficial Truncal Soft Tissue Sarcoma is Safe and Does Not Affect Metastatic Risk or Amputation Rate.

The benefits of systematic re-excision (RE) after initial unplanned excision (UE) of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of delayed RE versus systematic RE after UE on overall survival (OS), metastatic relapse-free survival (MRFS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS), and rate of amputation. Patients who underwent complete UE, without metastasis or residual disease, for primary extremity or superficial STS between 2007 and 2013 were analyzed. The amputation rate, LRFS, MRFS, and OS were assessed in cases of systematic RE in sarcoma referral centers (Group A), systematic RE outside of community centers (Group B), or without RE (Group C). Groups A, B, and C included 300 (48.2%), 71 (11.4%), and 251 (40.4%) patients, respectively. Median follow-up was 61months and 5-year OS was 88.4%, 87.3%, and 88% in Groups A, B, and C, respectively (p = 0.22), while 5-year MFRS was 85.4%, 86.2%, and 84.9%, respectively (p = 0.938); RE (p = 0.55) did not influence MRFS. The 5-year LRFS was 83%, 73.5%, and 63.8% in Groups A, B and C, respectively (p = 0.00001). Of the 123 local recurrences observed, 0/28, 1/15, and 5/80 patients in Groups A, B, and C, respectively, required amputation (p = 0.41). Factors influencing LRFS were adjuvant radiotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.21; p = 0.0001], initial R0 resection (HR 0.24, p = 0.0001), and Group A (HR 0.44; p = 0.01). Systematic RE in sarcoma centers offers best local control but does not impact OS. Delayed RE at the time of local relapse, if any, could be an option.

Efficacy of radio-hyperthermo-chemotherapy as salvage therapy for recurrent or residual malignant soft tissue tumors

Background: Recurrence after wide excision or residual tumor after an unplanned excision of a malignant soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is a complex problem, due to a higher recurrence rate and poorer survival rate compared with primary resection. Regional hyperthermia was used, with the expectation that it will enhance the anti-tumor effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of neoadjuvant concomitant radiotherapy, hyperthermia, and chemotherapy (RHC) for salvage of recurrent or residual malignant STS.Methods: We identified 64 patients with recurrent or residual STS treated between 1994 and 2013. After excluding those with low-grade malignancy, with recurrent bone tumor in the soft tissues, with truncal STS, and who declined to participate, 23 patients (7 with recurrence and 16 with residual tumor) underwent RHC. The histologic diagnoses were undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (n = 11), synovial sarcoma (n = 3), leiomyosarcoma and myxoid liposarcoma (n = 2 each), and other histologic types. As primary outcomes, the 5-year overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (D-MFS), and local control (LC) rates were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.Results: The median follow-up period was 112.3 months. The 5-year OS, D-MFS, and LC were 86.4%, 77.4%, and 86.7%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, tumor depth was considered as a negative prognostic factor for OS and D-MFS, and a positive margin was also a negative prognostic factor for OS, D-MFS LC with retained on Cox proportional hazards model in OS, and D-MFS.Conclusion: RHC is an effective option for salvage treatment of recurrent and residual STS.

Surgical management of truncal soft tissue sarcoma and other selected soft tissue neoplasms.

Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is a heterogeneous entity comprising only 1% of all adult cancers that has received considerable attention since it was initially described after the 1st century as "fleshy" by Claudius Galenus. Nick-named the forgotten cancer, more than 100 histologic subtypes have been identified making treatment paradigms extremely complex. A key principle in the management of truncal STS is a defined multi-disciplinary team consisting of several providers. In most instances, surgery is the cornerstone of treatment. This overview will focus on the management of truncal sarcoma from a surgical perspective that will entail several points of consideration including histologic subtype, degree of differentiation, margin status as well as necessity of reconstruction; it will also include discussion of other unique soft tissue neoplasms relevant to the breast and abdominal wall.

Perioperative chemotherapy is not associated with improved survival in high-grade truncal sarcoma

BackgroundThe treatment benefit of perioperative chemotherapy (CTX) for truncal soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is not well established. This study evaluates the association of CTX with survival for patients with resected primary high-grade truncal STS. Materials and methodsAdult patients with high-grade truncal STS who had curative-intent resection from 2000 to 2016 at seven U.S. institutions were evaluated retrospectively. Patients were stratified by receipt of CTX. Kaplan–Meier curves with log-rank tests were used to compare overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate characteristics associated with OS. ResultsOf patients with primary high-grade truncal STS, 235 underwent curative-intent resections. The most common histology was undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma and mean tumor size was 7.8 cm. Thirty percent of the patients received CTX (n = 70). Among patients receiving CTX, 34% (n = 24) had neoadjuvant CTX, 44% (n = 31) adjuvant CTX, and 21% (n = 15) had neoadjuvant and adjuvant CTX. Patients receiving CTX were more likely to receive radiation (51% versus 34%, P = 0.01), have deep tumors (86% versus 73%, P = 0.037) and solid organ invasion (14% versus 3%, P = 0.001). On univariate analysis, patients who received CTX had worse OS (P < 0.01) and a trend toward worse recurrence-free survival (P = 0.08). Margin status was the only variable associated with improved OS on multivariate analysis (odds ratio 4.36, 95% confidence interval 1.56, 12.13, P < 0.01). ConclusionsIn this multi-institutional retrospective analysis of resected high-grade truncal STS, receipt of perioperative CTX was not associated with improved OS, which may be related to selection bias. Microscopically negative margin status was the only independent factor associated with OS.