Pooling excreta, within treatments, prior to calorimetry reduces the time and cost of the bioassay for true metabolizable energy (TME) and does not alter mean TME values. However, by ignoring the among-bird variance of the gross energy per unit weight of excreta (G) and its covariance with the weight of excreta (D), the standard errors of mean TME values are subject to bias. An additional factor for consideration is the effect of the sampling error from pooled aggregates. These factors were examined using data from TME bioassays of 20 feedingstuffs and by measuring the standard deviations of gross energy values for subsamples from pooled excreta.The standard deviation of G for each unit subsample from pooled excreta samples was .0381 kJ/g with 20 degrees of freedom. The resulting contribution to the standard errors of mean TME values was so small that replicate subsampling from the bulked excreta is of minor importance, although a useful precaution.However, ignoring the among-bird variation in G as a consequence of pooling excreta caused the standard errors of mean TME values to be incorrectly estimated by amounts ranging from −62 to + 64%. Although for these particular feedingstuffs the average discrepancy was small, the potential magnitude of the bias for an individual feedingstuff is too large to be discounted in a research laboratory.
Read full abstract