(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)In the Ptolemaic models for the superior planets and Venus, the centre of the epicycle is located on a circle (the so-called deferent), the centre of which is displaced from that of the Earth by an eccentricity e, but its motion is uniform with respect to the so-called equant point, removed from the Earth by an eccentricity 2e from the Earth on the side of the centre of the deferent. The derivation of the planet's orbital elements (eccentricity and direction of the apsidal line) requires observations of three oppositions of the planet to the mean sun, when the planet points to the centre of epicycle. A difficulty arises since the angles of mean motion of the planet between two successive mean oppositions are known with respect to the equant point while the angles of the true motions between two consecutive mean oppositions are measured with respect to the Earth, the centre of the deferent being located exactly between the two. Ptolemy, in the Almagest (X.7, XI. 1 , XL5), explains an iterative algorithmic solution for finding the two parameters.1N. M. Swerdlow, in 1987, published a detailed analysis of another method proposed by Jabir b. Aflah of Seville (fl. the first quarter of the twelfth century), based on the Latin translation of his Islah al-majisfi (Improvement of the Almagest), made by Gerard of Cremona in 1 175. The method is a theoretical alternative to Ptolemy's but, as Swerdlow shows, it is practically inapplicable.2 1 will here call it the four-point method, because it makes use of four oppositions of the planet with the mean sun. Hitherto it has remained unnoticed that this method is already found in al-Qanun al-mas'udi of Abu al-Rayhan al-Biruni (973-1 048), 3 composed about one century earlier (apparently, during the reign of Mas 'Ud I, the ninth ruler of the Ghaznavid dynasty of Iran, 1030-41). What follows is a complete description of the method as explained by Biruni supplied with some mathematical explanations.Biruni states that Ptolemy was able to determine the eccentricity and the direction of the apsidal Une of a superior planet by seeking out four oppositions of the planet with the mean sun satisfying the condition below. Figure 1, as drawn in the edited text of al-Qanun with the original lettering (except those bearing primes) transcribed according to the standard proposed by E. S. Kennedy,4 shows the deferent ABCGK of the planet about the centre D; E represents the Earth and T, the centre of uniform motion, the equant [point]. TE is then the eccentricity of the equant [point] and DE, that of the deferent; in the Ptolemaic context, TE = 2DE = 2e. In the four mean oppositions, the planet and thus the centre of the epicycle are located, respectively, at the points A, B, G, and K. Our author first explains the essential condition in the application of the method: the difference between the true longitudes of the planet in each pair of oppositions (A-B and G-K) should be identical: angle AEB = angle GEK. The trajectories travelled by the epicycle's centre on the deferent in each pair of oppositions should also be identical (arc AB = arc GK) so that the mean motions of the planet in each pair of oppositions are equal: angle ATB = angle KTG. These conditions may be formulated as follows: in the two pairs of oppositions, the planet's centre of the epicycle describes the equal arcs, AB and GK, in equal periods of time. Biruni adds that what we mentioned is the property of the two arcs on the deferent equidistant from the diameter of the deferent passing through the apogee and perigee. Then the point C that marks one of the two apses (here, the apogee) is at the middle of the arc BG between the two arcs AB and GK (the point O, diametrically opposed to C, is then the perigee). Our author had already proved (al-Qanun VL8)5 the two particular theorems treating of the relation between the true motion in longitude and the corresponding equation of centrum in the solar eccentric orbit. …